Case: 15-3400

Document: 003112123058

Page: 1

Date Filed: 11/06/2015

www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
Stanley J. Caterbone
Advanced Media Group
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
IN THE UNITED STATES THIRD CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS
_______________________________________________________________________________
Lisa Michelle Lambert
:
PETITIONER
:
:
v.
:
CASE NO. 3400-2015
:
:
Lynn Bissonnette, et al.,
:
RESPONDANT
:
:
Stanley J. Caterbone
APPELLANT

:
:
:
:

ARGUMENT BY THE APPELLANT REGARDING SUMMARY PANEL

I hereby on this 6th

day of November, 2015, according to the LETTER dated October 9, 2015, which

states the following This appeal has been listed for possible summary action by a panel of this Court,
pursuant to Chapter 10.6 of the Internal operating Procedures of the United States Court of Appeals
for theThird Circuit. See also Third Circuit Local Appellate Rule(3rd Cir. LAR) 27.4 Chapter 10.6
provides that the Court sua sponte (by its own action) may take summary action on an appeal if it
appears that no substantial question is presented or that subsequent precedent or a change in
circumstances warrants such action. Specifically, the Court may affirm, reverse, vacate, modify, or
remand the judgment or order appealed. The parties may submit written argument supporting or
opposing summary action. The APPELLANT hereby submits for considerations in the above captioned case
the attached ARGUMENT for the Court.

Date: November 6, 2015

/s/ Stanley J. Caterbone

Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se
Appellant
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
(717)-669-2163
scaterbone@live.com
http://www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com/__

Case: 15-3400

Document: 003112123058
003112098354

Page: 2
1

Date Filed: 11/06/2015

10/09/2015

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

MARCIA M. WALDRON

CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

TELEPHONE

215-597-2995

21400 UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE

601 MARKET STREET
PHILADELPHIA, PA 19106-1790

Website: www.ca3.uscourts.gov

October 9, 2015

Mr. Stanley J. Caterbone

1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
RE: Lisa Lambert v. Superintendent Framingham MCI, et al.
Case Number: 15-3400
District Case Number: 5-14-cv-02559
_________________________________________________

Dear Mr. Caterbone:

This appeal has been listed for possible summary action by a panel of this Court, pursuant to
Chapter 10.6 of the Internal operating Procedures of the United States Court of Appeals for the
Third Circuit. See also Third Circuit Local Appellate Rule(3rd Cir. LAR) 27.4 Chapter 10.6
provides that the Court sua sponte (by its own action) may take summary action on an appeal if it
appears that no substantial question is presented or that subsequent precedent or a change in
circumstances warrants such action. Specifically, the Court may affirm, reverse, vacate, modify,
or remand the judgment or order appealed. The parties may submit written argument supporting
or opposing summary action.
The panel of this court that considers possible summary action also will consider whether a
certificate of appealability is required for the purpose of this appeal. See 28 U.S.C. Section 2253.
If the Court determines that a certificate of appealability is required, appellant's notice of appeal
will be deemed to be such an application, unless appellant has submitted a formal application for
a certificate of appealability. See 3rd Cir. LAR 22.1.
Any response regarding summary action or issuance of a certificate of appealability must be
received in the Clerk's Office within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter. Please submit to
the Clerk and original copy of any response, and a certificate of service indicating that all parties
have been served with a copy of the response. The Court will carefully review the District Court
record, along with any written submissions received from the parties.

Case: 15-3400

Document: 003112123058
003112098354

Page: 3
2

Date Filed: 11/06/2015

10/09/2015

October 9, 2015
Page 2
_________________

Issuance of the briefing schedule will be stayed pending action by the Court. If the Court
declines to take summary action or grants the application for a certificate of appealability, the
Clerk will issue a briefing schedule. The parties will be advised of any order issued in this
matter.
Very truly yours,

Marcia M. Waldron, Clerk

By:
Jo-Ann Williams, Administrative Assistant
cc:

Jeremy H.G. Ibrahim, Sr., Esq.

District Attorney Lancaster County

Case: 15-3400

Document: 003112123058

Page: 4

Date Filed: 11/06/2015

ARGUMENT BY THE APPELLANT REGARDING SUMMARY PANEL

The APPELLANT in this case has a long history with both the U.S. District Court for the
Eastern District of Pennsylvania and the U.S. Court of Appeals. See the following dockets:
STANLEY J. CATERBONE is an appellant in 7 cases.
2:05-cv-03689-AB IN RE: STANLEY L. CATERBONE

filed 07/15/05

closed 10/06/05

2:06-cv-01538-AB

IN RE: CATERBONE

filed 04/11/06

closed 07/19/06

2:06-cv-04154-AB

IN RE: STANLEY J. CATERBONE

filed 09/18/06

closed 08/23/07

2:06-cv-04212-AB

CATERBONE et al

filed 09/21/06

closed 08/23/07

2:06-cv-05012-AB

CATERBONE et al v. CALLAHAN et al

filed 11/14/06

closed 03/20/07

2:06-cv-05117-AB

IN RE: CATERBONE et al.

filed 11/20/06

closed 06/18/07

2:07-cv-01093-AB

IN RE: STANLEY J. CATERBONE

filed 03/20/07

closed 03/05/08

STANLEY J. CATERBONE is a debtor in posession in 7 cases.

2:05-cv-03689-AB IN RE: STANLEY L. CATERBONE
filed 07/15/05

closed 10/06/05

2:06-cv-01538-AB

IN RE: CATERBONE

filed 04/11/06

closed 07/19/06

2:06-cv-04154-AB

IN RE: STANLEY J. CATERBONE

filed 09/18/06

closed 08/23/07

2:06-cv-04212-AB

CATERBONE et al

filed 09/21/06

closed 08/23/07

2:06-cv-05012-AB

CATERBONE et al v. CALLAHAN et al

filed 11/14/06

closed 03/20/07

2:06-cv-05117-AB

IN RE: CATERBONE et al.

filed 11/20/06

closed 06/18/07

2:07-cv-01093-AB

IN RE: STANLEY J. CATERBONE

filed 03/20/07

closed 03/05/08

STANLEY J. CATERBONE is a petitioner in 2 cases.

2:06-cv-05138JCJ

CATERBONE v. THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al

filed 11/20/06
08

closed 06/25/

5:15-cv-03984JCJ

CATERBONE v. LANCASTER BEHAVIORAL HEALTH/ CRISIS INTERVENTION

et al

filed 07/17/15
15

closed 08/25/

STANLEY J. CATERBONE is a plaintiff in 10 cases.

2:05-cv02288-MAM

CATERBONE v. LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON et al

filed 12/12/07
0/30/08

closed 1

2:06-cv04154-AB

IN RE: STANLEY J. CATERBONE

filed 09/18/06
8/23/07

closed 0

2:06-cv04650-MAM

CATERBONE v. WENGER et al

filed 11/17/06
0/23/07

closed 1

2:06-cv04734-MAM

CATERBONE et al v. FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT GROUP, LTD. et al

filed 11/16/06
1/17/06

closed 1

2:06-cv05117-AB

IN RE: CATERBONE et al.

filed 11/20/06
6/18/07

closed 0

2:08-cv02981-MAM

CATERBONE et al v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF

TRANSPORTATION BUREAU OF DRIVER LICENSING et al

filed 06/18/08
7/14/08

closed 0

2:08-cv02982-MAM

CATERBONE et al v. LANCASTER CITY POLICE BUREAU et al

filed 06/18/08
7/11/08

closed 0

2:08-cv02983-MAM

CATERBONE et al v. COUNTY OF LANCASTER et al

filed 06/18/08
7/11/08

closed 0

5:09-cv05205-MAM

CATERBONE

filed 10/30/09
1/19/09

closed 1

5:10-cv01558-MAM

CATERBONE et al v. FULTON FINANCIAL CORPORATION et al

filed 04/06/10
4/14/10

closed 0

Case: 15-3400

Document: 003112123058

Page: 5

Date Filed: 11/06/2015

The APPELLANT is a party to the following cases in the U.S. Court of Appeals:
Case Selection Page
Case Number
Title

Opening
Date

Party

Last
Docket
Entry

06-3955
Caterbone v. Lancaster Cty Prison,
et al

09/06/2006

Stanley J.
Caterbone

07/05/200 0313-2 : 05-cv-02288

7
United States District Court for the Eastern
15:14:00
District of Pennsylvania

07-2151
In re: Stanley Caterbone

04/30/2007

Stanley J.
Caterbone

05/03/201 0313-2 : 06-cv-05012

1
United States District Court for the Eastern
16:04:01
District of Pennsylvania

07-3054
In Re: Caterbone, et al

07/13/2007

Stanley J.
Caterbone

06/20/200 0313-2 : 06-cv-05117

8
United States District Court for the Eastern
10:35:49
District of Pennsylvania

07-4474
Caterbone v. Lancaster Cty Prison,
et al

11/30/2007

Stanley J.
Caterbone

10/22/200 0313-2 : 05-cv-02288

8
United States District Court for the Eastern
09:28:30
District of Pennsylvania

07-4475
Caterbone, et al v. Wenger, et al

12/07/2007

Stanley J.
Caterbone

10/22/200 0313-2 : 06-cv-04650

8
United States District Court for the Eastern
09:28:30
District of Pennsylvania

10-2313
Stanley Caterbone, et al v. Fulton
Financial Corp, et al

05/14/2010

Stanley J.
Caterbone

08/25/201 0313-2 : 5-10-cv-01558

0
United States District Court for the Eastern
16:56:17
District of Pennsylvania

15-3400
Lisa Lambert v. Superintendent
Framingham MCI, et al

10/08/2015

Stanley J.
Caterbone

11/04/201 0313-2 : 5-14-cv-02559

5
United States District Court for the Eastern
17:47:47
District of Pennsylvania

Originating Case Number

Origin

The APPELLANT has argued extensively and provided sufficient evidence to all courts
concerning wrongdoing by the government at every level; local, state, and federal, immediately
following the APPELLANT'S disclosure of wrongdoing in the International Signal & Control, Plc., or
ISC in June of 1987. Those activities had lead to a staggering 8 criminal charges, 4 of which were
felonies, and subsequent arrests up to and including 2006, that were the basis for the APPELLANT'S
argument of PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT.

The same said actors and principals were also

engaged in similar PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT in the LISA MICHELLE LAMBERT case, as

evidenced by the Honorable Judge Stewert Dalzell's findings in 1987.
Accordingly, the APPELLANT will argue the following with regards to legal standing;
Movant - One who makes a motion before a court. The applicant for a judicial rule or order.
Generally, it is the job of the movant to convince a judge to rule, or grant an order, in favor of the
motion. Rules and legal precedent within particular jurisdictions, as well as the type of motion
sought, dictate the burdens of proof and persuasion each party must meet when a court considers a
motion. For example, one common type of motion is a motion for Summary Judgment. This motion
is made shortly before a trial commences and is granted if the pleadings, depositions, answers to
interrogatories, and affidavits indicate that no genuine dispute as to any material fact exists and
that the movant is entitled to a favorable judgment as a Matter of Law. In other words, if the facts
of the case are not disputed, it is easier, faster, and less expensive for a judge to simply rule on the
legal issues that apply to those facts, avoiding a trial altogether. A summary judgment movant in

Case: 15-3400

Document: 003112123058

Page: 6

Date Filed: 11/06/2015

most jurisdictions has the burden of showing that no genuine issue of material fact exists and that,
by law, the undisputed facts support a judgment in the movant's favor. But once the movant meets
this burden, the opposing party is given a chance to refute the movant's argument. The opposing
party will try to establish that there is a genuine dispute about a material fact in the case and that
the

law

does

not

support

judgment

in

the

movant's

favor.

From

http://legal-

dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Matter+of+Law
In addition, the APPELLANT has raised the issue of his Victimization of U.S. Sponsored Mind
Control.

This places another burden upon the APPELLLANT, in addition to the burden of being a

federal whistleblower. Both burdens subject the APPELLANT to an unprecedented life of torture and
abuse. The APPELLLANT requests the COURT to bear compassion, judicial integrity, and fairness in
the deliberations of this and all cases that the APPELLANT is named a party to.
The APPELLANT has raised sufficient issues and supported such issues with sufficient
evidence to allow the COURT to reach the fair and equitable verdict in this case.

Date: November 6, 2015

/s/ Stanley J. Caterbone

Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se
Appellant
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
(717)-669-2163
scaterbone@live.com
http://www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com/__