Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Bauhaus-Universitt
Weimar
Capacity Design
Analysis of frame structures considering the interaction with
infill walls
Table of contents
1.
Introduction
Motivation
Strategies
2.
Strategies
overview
Details to walls as masses
Details to walls as diagonal braces
3.
4.
Example of calculation
5.
Damage pictures
6.
Conclusions
7.
References
Bauhaus-Universitt
Weimar
Introduction
Bauhaus-Universitt
Weimar
Motivation:
Killari 1993
El Asnam 1980
Introduction
Strategies:
as masses
- no stiffness effect
- for damaged and weak infill walls
as diagonal braces
- consideration of stiffness
- possibility to define hinges and damage grades
as slabs
- exact characterization of the behavior
- use of exact material laws
- assignment of damage grades difficult
Bauhaus-Universitt
Weimar
As masses
Bauhaus-Universitt
Weimar
fundamental
NS
EW
2,50 Hz
2,97 Hz
SLang
ETABS
calculated
NS
EW
2,46 Hz
3,10 Hz
2,27 Hz
2,63 Hz
Diagonal braces
Bauhaus-Universitt
Weimar
overview
simple brace model
consideration of stiffness for elastic and plastic behaviour
failure modes:
corner crushing (compression)
diagonal compression mode
diagonal cracking mode and/or bed joint sliding
Bauhaus-Universitt
Weimar
a) stiffness
4 E fe col hinf
1
4
Linf
hcol
a
rinf
Lcol
tinf
Eme
Efe
Icol
masonry
Bauhaus-Universitt
Weimar
b) strength
I
sliding-shear failure
i
Vslide
Linf tinf Eme 2
hinf
hcol
a
rinf
Lcol
II
compression failure
Bauhaus-Universitt
Weimar
b) strength
III
Vcr
hinf
Linf
hcol
Lcol
cr 20 f me'
a
rinf
2 2 tinf cr
Linf hinf
h
L
inf
inf
IV
Bauhaus-Universitt
Weimar
c) deformation
- no clear experimental results for the behavior modes (b)
- experimental evidence supports the following inter-story drift limit states for
different masonry infill panels:
- brick masonry
1,5 %
2,0%
2,5 %
Bauhaus-Universitt
Weimar
w = 0,25 dm
hm
w - depends on the relative stiffness of frame and panel, stressstrain curves of the materials and the load level
Lm
0,03 f m'
RS
dm t
h
1 0,3
l
h
w
dm
l
2
RC z t f m' sec
3
4 Ec I g hm
2 Em t sin 2
Bauhaus-Universitt
Weimar
CE = 0;
OZ = 0; CR = 0,5;
K i ,h
1
3
hinf
1,2 hinf
Ime
Gme
ftp
Fy ,h
Linf tinf f tp
2
0,5
1 CI 1
CI 1,1
CI 2 1,1
Linf
hinf
Bauhaus-Universitt
Weimar
Fy
Fy ,h
cos d
d y 1,1
Fu Fy 1 1
F
Fd u
2
Fy
Ki
Ki
cos 2
du d y
d d du
Fu
Ku
Ku
F
Fe u
4
K i ,h
Fu
de dd K
4
2
0,1 K i ,h
cos 2
Bauhaus-Universitt
Weimar
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
0.0E+00
1.0E-03
2.0E-03
Zarnic 1
Compression
3.0E-03
Zarnic 2
Initial shear capacity
4.0E-03
5.0E-03
Sliding-shear
Final shear capacity
6.0E-03
Bauhaus-Universitt
Weimar
Modeling
- calculation of the diagonal brace dimensions and the failure relationship
Analysis
- run push-over analysis
- start iteration to determine the different limit states
- slight damage
- moderate damage
- extensive damage
- apply the capacity spectrum method
Base
Shear
Base Shear
Roof Displacement
Displacement
Bauhaus-Universitt
Weimar
Bauhaus-Universitt
Weimar
Bauhaus-Universitt
Weimar
North facade
North facade
Bauhaus-Universitt
Weimar
Bauhaus-Universitt
Weimar
in transverse direction
in longitudinal direction
Damage pictures
Bauhaus-Universitt
Weimar
GermanTaskForce 2003
Damage pictures
Bauhaus-Universitt
Weimar
GermanTaskForce 2003
Damage pictures
GermanTaskForce 2003
Bauhaus-Universitt
Weimar
Damage pictures
Bauhaus-Universitt
Weimar
GermanTaskForce 2003
GermanTaskForce 2003
Conclusions
Bauhaus-Universitt
Weimar
References
[1]
Bauhaus-Universitt
Weimar
FEMA 306
Evaluation of earthquake damaged concrete and masonry wall buildings, basic
procedures manual, Washington D.C., USA, 1998.
[2]
[3]
[4]