Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
School of Urban and Environmental Engineering, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology (UNIST), Ulsan, Republic of Korea
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Ulsan, Ulsan, Republic of Korea
h i g h l i g h t s
The higher ratio of recycled aggregate resulted in the better owability of concrete.
Recycled aggregate concrete with y ash presented slightly lower yield stress, but much lower plastic viscosity.
Fly ash caused only a minor reduction in the strength of recycled aggregate concrete.
Recycled aggregate concrete with y ash showed much higher chloride resistance than that without y ash.
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 7 March 2013
Received in revised form 6 June 2013
Accepted 15 July 2013
Available online 9 August 2013
Keywords:
Recycled aggregate
Fly ash
Rheology
Strength
Chloride diffusion coefcient
ICAR Rheometer
a b s t r a c t
The recycling of demolished concrete has been emerging as a sustainable solution to warrant the reduction of construction wastes, as well as to prevent the depletion of natural resources from growing construction demand. Nevertheless, some key factors that would affect the properties of recycled
aggregate concrete have not been thoroughly investigated, such as the proportion of recycled aggregates,
the moisture state of recycled aggregates, and the design compressive strength of concrete. In particular,
little research was done on the combined effects of recycled aggregates and y ash, popularly used as a
partial substitution of cement. Given the concerns, this study investigates the effects of such factors on
the mechanical and durability properties of recycled aggregate concrete. Eleven cases of concrete mixtures were tested for the rheological properties of fresh concrete, compressive strength, tensile strength,
and chloride diffusion coefcient. In general, the higher ratio of recycled aggregates resulted in the better
owability of concrete. Also, the use of y ash improved the owability of recycled aggregate concrete.
The strength test results showed that the higher ratio of recycled aggregates generally caused the lower
compressive and tensile strengths of concrete. However, the cases with 30% recycled aggregates showed
only slight compressive strength reductions. Similarly, the use of y ash caused only small reductions in
the compressive strength of recycled aggregate concrete. In contrast, the negative effects of recycled
aggregates and y ash were greater in the tensile strength than in the compressive strength. Lastly,
the cases containing y ash exhibited much higher resistance to chloride penetration, even in the cases
with recycled aggregates.
2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
500
Nomenclature
fc0
s
s0
l
c_
D
z
F
R
T
xd
t
U
L
erf-1
cd
c0
Fig. 2. Particle size distributions of coarse and ne aggregates used in the tests.
501
3. Test methods
2. Experimental procedures
2.1. Test variables
In this study, various properties of recycled aggregate concrete are investigated
such as the rheological properties of fresh concrete, compressive strength, tensile
strength, and chloride ion diffusion coefcient. The test variables are the ratio of
recycled aggregates in the total amount of coarse aggregates, the presence of y
ash as a partial substitution (30%) of cement, the design compressive strength of
concrete, and the moisture state of recycled coarse aggregates. A total of eleven
cases of concrete mixtures are tested, as summarized in Table 1.
As for the designation of the mixture cases in Table 1, the rst letters N and H
indicate that the design compressive strength of concrete is equal to 24 and 40 MPa
respectively, which represent normal and high strength concretes in turn. The additional letter F means that 30% of the total cement is substituted by y ash; in the
cases without F, y ash is not included. Also, OD and SSD stand for two different moisture states of recycled coarse aggregates: oven-dried and saturated-surfacedried states, respectively. Lastly, the ending number 0, 30, or 100 says the
zpercentage of recycled aggregates in the total amount of coarse aggregates.
2.2. Materials
Type I Portland cement is used that has the specic gravity of 3.15 and the
neness of 3312 cm2/g. Fly ash has the specic gravity of 2.14 and the neness of
3360 cm2/g, and several other properties of y ash are shown in Table 2. The
Table 1
Test variables of the eleven mixture cases.
Mixture
casea,b
Design
compressive
strength (fc0 )
Moisture
state of
coarse
aggregatec
Replacement
ratio of recycled
aggregate (%)d
Use of y
ash (30% of
cement)
N-SSD-0
NF-SSD-0
N-SSD-30
NF-SSD-30
N-SSD-100
NF-SSD-100
N-OD-100
24 MPa
SSD
0
0
30
30
100
100
100
X
O
X
O
X
O
X
H-SSD-0
H-SSD-30
H-SSD-100
HF-SSD-100
40 MPa
0
30
100
100
X
X
X
O
OD
SSD
s s0 lc_
502
Table 2
Properties of y ash.
4. Test results
SiO2
(%)
Water
(%)
Loss on
ignition
(%)
Density
(g/cm3)
Blaine
neness
(cm2/g)
Flow
value
ratio (%)
Activity
index
(%)
48.8
0.1
3.5
2.14
3360
101
81
p
RT xd a xd
zFE
t
U2
L
r
RT
2cd
1
a2
1
erf
zFE
c0
Table 3
Properties of aggregates.
Property of aggregate
Used aggregates
Recycled coarse
aggregate
Natural coarse
aggregate
Fine
Aggregate
2.14
2.62
2.56
6.28
0.84
1.41
21.1
57
0.6
Harmless
0.15
4.9
Less than 1.0
(volume)
Less than 1.0
(weight)
14.6
59
0.2
58
1.6
0.08
2.4
0.4
3.5
Absorption (%)
Abrasion (%)
Absolute volume (%)
0.08 mm Sieve passing (%)
Alkali aggregate reaction
Amount of clay mass (%)
Stability (%)
Contents of
Organic
impurity (%)
impurity
Inorganic
impurity
Less than 40
More than 55
Less than 1.0
Harmless
Less than 0.2
Less than 12
Less than 1.0 (volume)
Test regulation
503
Fig. 3. Coarse aggregates used in the tests: (a) recycled, and (b) natural.
Table 4
Mix proportion for each mixture case (kgf/m3).
Mixture case
Water
Cement
Fine aggregate
N-SSD-0
NF-SSD-0
N-SSD-30
NF-SSD-30
N-SSD-100
NF-SSD-100
N-OD-100
H-SSD-0
H-SSD-30
H-SSD-100
HF-SSD-100
159
159
159
159
159
159
159
159
159
159
159
369
258
369
258
369
258
369
495
495
495
347
1060
1060
742
742
1034
724
691
691
691
691
691
691
691
614
614
614
614
273
273
911
911
911
266
888
888
Fly ash
75
75
75
101
AEa
1.11
1.11
1.11
1.11
1.11
1.11
1.11
4.95
4.95
4.95
4.95
AE = air-entraining admixture.
Fig. 5. Test device for measurement of chloride ion penetration (NT Build 492 [27]).
while the slump increased. Fig. 8 illustrates the relationship between slump and yield stress for the six normal strength cases
(fc0 = 24 MPa). A roughly negative logarithmic relationship was
found between the slump and yield stress of the three cases without y ash (N-SSD series), and between those with y ash (NF-SSD
series); in each series, the ratio of recycled aggregates varied only.
504
(Two equations proposed by Wallevik [16] and Murata and Kukawa [28] are also plotted in Fig. 8. The equations are not directly
comparable with the test results, because they were determined
for the mixtures with natural aggregates only and with other variables such as water/cement ratio and curing time. It is likely that
many factors should be taken into account in quantifying the relationship between slump and yield stress.) On the other hand, the
use of y ash only slightly reduced the yield stress of recycled
aggregate concrete; no signicant change of yield stress occurred,
while slump greatly increased (i.e., 45100%) with y ash (compare N-SSD-30 vs. NF-SSD-30, and N-SSD-100 vs. NF-SSD-100).
This difference may be because the lower plastic viscosity, presented in the following, caused by y ash contributed to the increase of slump.
As for the plastic viscosity of recycled aggregate concrete, no
consistent tendency is observed in the effect of recycled aggregates
on the plastic viscosity of esh concrete (compare N-SSD-30 vs.
N-SSD-100, NF-SSD-30 vs. NF-SSD-100). On the other hand, the
recycled aggregate concretes containing y ash present signicantly lower plastic viscosity values than those with no y ash.
However, no apparent segregation was noticed during the tests.
In summary, y ash increased the slump of recycled aggregate
concrete, seemingly by reducing the plastic viscosity without
segregation.
Table 5
Results of slump and ow curve tests.
Mixture case
NSSD-0
N-SSD30
N-SSD100
NFSSD-0
NF-SSD30
NF-SSD100
Slump (mm)
Yield stress (Pa)
Plastic viscosity
(Pa s)
77
1180
21.4
88
833
86.3
131
619
75.5
116
1016
27.8
182
780
10.0
190
590
32.2
505
Table 6
Results of compressive and splitting tensile strength tests.
Mixture case
Compressive strength
(MPa)
Days of curing
N-SSD-0
N-SSD-30
N-SSD-100
NF-SSD-0
NF-SSD-30
NF-SSD-100
N-OD-100
H-SSD-0
H-SSD-30
H-SSD-100
HF-SSD-100
28
91
28
91
30
30
27
16
17
19
15
40
37
27
28
31
30
27
27
27
22
18
50
46
33
29
35
30
28
34
28
25
18
55
47
34
34
3.5
2.9
2.3
2.5
2.2
2.2
1.2
4.2
3.2
2.6
2.8
3.6
3.2
2.6
2.7
2.8
2.4
1.3
4.3
3.5
2.9
3.0
Fig. 11. Splitting tensile strengths of the cases not containing y ash (curing time in
parenthesis: 28 or 91 days).
Fig. 9. Compressive strengths of the cases not containing y ash (curing time in
parenthesis: 7, 28, or 91 days).
Fig. 12. Splitting tensile strengths of the cases containing y ash (curing time in
parenthesis: 28 or 91 days).
and 36% lower strengths than the concrete with saturated-surface-dried recycled aggregates (N-SSD-100) at 7 and 91 days of
curing, respectively. A possible reason for the signicant strength
drop is that the mixing water immigrated into the oven-dried recycled aggregates with a high absorption capacity. The lack of mixing
water likely affected the hydration process of concrete in a negative manner.
4.3. Splitting tensile strength
Fig. 10. Compressive strengths of the cases containing y ash (curing time in
parenthesis: 7, 28, or 91 days).
The results of splitting tensile strength tests for all eleven mixture cases (Table 6) are shown in Fig. 11 (cases without y ash) and
Fig. 12 (with y ash). The tensile strength of concrete generally
decreased when the ratio of recycled aggregates increased, as observed in the compressive strength. However, the degree of reduction in the tensile strength was greater than in the compressive
strength. For example, in the normal strength cases (fc0 = 24 MPa)
that did not include y ash (Fig. 11), the use of 30% and 100% recycled aggregates (N-SSD-30 and N-SSD-100) caused approximately
17% and 34% reductions in the tensile strength respectively,
compared to the case with natural aggregates only (N-SSD-0) at
28 days of curing. Furthermore, the high strength cases
(fc0 = 40 MPa) with 30% and 100% recycled aggregates (H-SSD-30
and H-SSD-100) had 24% and 38% lower tensile strengths respectively, than H-SSD-0 at 28 days of curing. The greater strength
reduction in tension than in compression is well illustrated in
Fig. 13; all data points for recycled aggregate concrete are plotted
506
Fig. 13. Relationship between compressive and tensile strengths (Note: a linear
regression line is drawn for each series; fctm = mean tensile strength, and
fck = specied characteristic compressive strength, dened in b MC2010 [29]).
below the curve specied in b MC2010 [29], while those for natural aggregate concrete are mostly above the curve. This trend
might be possibly because existing defects (e.g., micro-cracks) in
the recycled aggregates affected more on the tensile strength than
on the compressive strength [30].
The use of y ash as a 30% substitution of cement generally
caused a reduction in the tensile strength of the normal strength
specimens (fc0 = 24 MPa); the smaller reduction occurred in the case
with the higher ratio of recycled aggregates. For example, NF-SSD0, NF-SSD-30, and NF-SSD-100 (Fig. 12) showed 29%, 24%, and 4%
lower tensile strengths than N-SSD-0, N-SSD-30, and N-SSD-100
(Fig. 11) respectively at 28 days of curing, and 25%, 13%, and 8%
lower strengths at 91 days of curing. However, the high strength
specimen (fc0 = 40 MPa) having y ash (HF-SSD-100) showed a
higher tensile strength than the specimen with no y ash (HSSD-100).
As for the effect of moisture state of coarse aggregates, the normal strength concrete with oven-dried recycled aggregates (N-OD100) had 48% and 50% lower tensile strengths than the concrete
with saturated-surface-dried recycled aggregates (N-SSD-100) at
28 and 91 days of curing, respectively (see Fig. 11); the percentages
were slightly higher than those in the compressive strength.
4.4. Chlorine ion diffusion coefcient
Fig. 14 plots chloride diffusion coefcients of the seven normal strength cases (fc0 = 24 MPa) in Table 1. In all the cases, the
This study investigated the mechanical and durability properties of recycled aggregate concrete, such as the rheological properties of fresh concrete, compressive strength, tensile strength, and
chloride diffusion coefcient. The main test variables included
the ratio (0%, 30%, and 100%) of recycled aggregates in the total
amount of coarse aggregates, the presence of y ash as a partial
substitution (30%) of cement, the design compressive strength
(24 or 40 MPa) of concrete, and the moisture state (SSD or OD) of
recycled coarse aggregates. In particular, the combined effects of
recycled aggregates and y ash were explored, which should be
considered during the mix design. The ndings and conclusions
may be summarized as follows:
The higher ratio of recycled coarse aggregates generally resulted
in the better owability of esh concrete, which was found from
the results of both ow curve and slump tests. A roughly negative logarithmic relationship was found between the slump and
yield stress of the cases with different ratios of recycled
aggregates.
The use of y ash improved the owability of concrete. The
slump of concrete greatly increased due to y ash, while the
yield stress only slightly decreased. The recycled aggregate concretes containing y ash presented signicantly lower plastic
viscosity values than those not containing y ash.
The strength test results showed that the higher ratio of recycled aggregates generally caused the lower compressive and
tensile strengths of concrete. However, the cases using 30%
recycled aggregates showed only small reductions in the compressive strength; all the specimens with less than 30% recycled
aggregates (even with y ash) satised their respective design
compressive strengths. In contrast, the negative effect of recycled aggregates was greater in the tensile strength than in the
compressive strength.
The presence of y ash caused a reduction in the compressive
strength of recycled aggregate concrete, but the reductions
were not critical on a long-term perspective (less than 12% at
the curing age of 91 days). As for the tensile strength of concrete, higher strength reductions up to roughly 20% occurred
due to y ash at the age of 91 days.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the Ministry of Knowledge
Economy, Korea, under the RIS (Regional Innovation System) Support Program, supervised by the Korea Institute for Advancement
of Technology. Also, support by Basic Science Research Program
through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded
by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (Grant No.
2010-0022955) is gratefully acknowledged.
References
[1] Metz B, Davidson O, Coninck HCD, Loos M, Meyer LA, editors. IPCC special
report on carbon dioxide capture and storage. Cambridge, United
Kingdom: Cambridge University Press; 2005. p. 442.
[2] United States Environmental Protection Agency. <http://www.epa.gov/
region1/solidwaste/cnd>.
[3] Korean Ministry of Construction and Transportation. In: Report for current
status of natural aggregate in Korea. Korean Ministry of Construction and
Transportation, Sejong Special Governing City, Korea; 2001.
[4] Mehta PK. Concrete technology for sustainable development. Concr Int
1999;21:4753.
[5] Schokker AJ. The sustainable concrete guide strategies and
examples. Farmington Hills, Michigan, USA: US Green Concrete Council; 2010.
[6] Task Group 3.8 within Commission 3. Guidelines for green concrete structures
(b Bulletin No. 67). Lausanne, Switzerland: International Federation for
Structural Concrete; 2012.
[7] Korea Environment Corporation. <http://www.cwms.or.kr/>.
[8] Northeast Waste Management Ofcials Association. Construction and
demolition waste management in the northeast in 2006, Boston,
Massachusetts, USA; 2009.
[9] Korean Ministry of Environment. Report for statistics of recycling in
Korea. Sejong Special Governing City, Korea: Korean Ministry of
Environment; 2005.
507
[10] Korean
Concrete
Institute
(KCI).
Korean
Concrete
Standard
Specications. Seoul, Korea: Korean Concrete Institute; 2009.
[11] Kong D, Lei T, Zheng J, Ma C, Jiang J, Jiang J. Effect and mechanism of surfacecoating pozzolanic materials around aggregate on properties and ITZ
microstructure of recycled aggregate concrete. Constr Build Mater
2010;24:7018.
[12] Kou SC, Poon CS. Properties of self-compacting concrete prepared with coarse
and ne recycled concrete aggregates. Cem Concr Compos 2009;31:6227.
[13] Poon CS, Kou SC. Properties of concrete prepared with PVA-impregnated
recycled concrete aggregate. Cem Concr Compos 2010;32:64954.
[14] Nassar PUD, Soroushian P. Strength and durability of recycled aggregate
concrete containing milled glass as partial replacement for cement. Constr
Build Mater 2012;29:37786.
[15] Siddique R. Performance characteristics of high-volume class F y ash
concrete. Cem Concr Res 2004;34:48793.
[16] Wallevik JE. Relationship between the Bingham parameters and slump. Cem
Concr Compos 2006;36:121421.
[17] Xiao J, Li J, Zhang C. Mechanical properties of recycled aggregate concrete
under uniaxial loading. Cem Concr Compos 2005;35:118794.
[18] Kwan WH, Ramli M, Kam KJ, Sulieman MZ. Inuence of the amount of recycled
coarse aggregate in concrete design and durability properties. Constr Build
Mater 2012;26:56573.
[19] Sriravindrarajah R, Wang NDH, Ervin LJW. Mix design for pervious recycled
aggregate concrete. Int J Concr Struct Mater 2012;6(4):23946.
[20] McNeil K, Kang THK. Recycled concrete aggregates: a review. Int J Concr Struct
Mater 2013;7(1):619.
[21] Berndt ML. Properties of sustainable concrete containing y ash, slag and
recycled concrete aggregate. Constr Build Mater 2009;23:260613.
[22] Sim J, Park C. Compressive strength and resistance to chloride ion penetration
and carbonation of recycled aggregate concrete with varying amount of y ash
and ne recycled aggregate. Waste Manage 2011;31:235260.
[23] A.C.I. Committee 555. Removal and reuse of hardened concrete. Farmington
Hill, Michigan, USA: American Concrete Institute; 2001.
[24] RILEM TC 121-DRG. Specication for concrete with recycled aggregate. Mater
Struct 1994;27:5579.
[25] Germann Instruments Inc. ICAR Rheometer Manual. Evanston, Illinois, USA;
2007.
[26] Robertson RE, Stiff Jr HA. An improved mathematical model for relating shear
stress to shear rate in drilling uids and cement slurries. SPE J 1976;16:316.
[27] Nordic Council of Ministers. Chloride migration coefcient from non-steadystate migration experiments (NT Build 492). Espoo, Finland: Nordtest; 1999.
[28] Murata J, Kukawa H. Viscosity equation for fresh concrete. ACI Mater J
1992;89(3):2307.
[29] Fdration Internationale du Bton. Fib Model Code 2010 (MC2010). Lausanne,
Switzerland: International Federation for Structural Concrete; 2012.
[30] Casuccio M, Torrijos MC, Giaccio G, Zerbino R. Failure mechanism of recycled
aggregate concrete. Constr Build Mater 2008;22:15006.