Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
SPE 18978
Design and Evaluation of Acid Fracturing Treatments
by Kamel Ben-Naceur* and Michael J. Economides*
Dowell Schlumberger
*SPE Member
Copyright 1989, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Inc.
This paper was prepared for presentation at the SPE Joint Rocky Mountain Regional/Low Permeability Reservoirs Symposium and Exhibition held in Denver, Colorado, March 6-8, 1989.
This paper was selected for presentation by an SPE Program Committee following review of information contained in an abstract submitted by the author(s). Contents of the paper,
as presented, have not been reviewed by the Society of Petroleum Engineers and are subject to correction by the author(s). The material, as presented, does not necessarily reflect
any position of the Society of Petroleum Engineers, its officers, or members. Papers presented at SPE meetings are subject to publication review by Editorial Committees of the Society
of Petroleum Engineers. Permission to copy is restricted to an abstract of not more than 300 words. Illustrations may not be copied. The abstract should contain conspicuous acknowledgment
of where and by whom the paper is presented. Write Publications Manager, SPE; P.O. Box 833836, Richardson, TX 75083-3836. Telex, 730989 SPEDAL.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
During acid fracturing, different fluids, including a reactive one, are injected. As a result certain complex phenomena are evident. The determination of the performance of the
'treating fluids from injectivity tests departs from techniques
that are applicable in propped fracturing because of the drastic change in rheological and leak-off properties between the
viscous pad and the acid. Also, the simulation of the treatments includes the mechanism of diffusion of the reactive fluid
to the fracture walls, and the injection of fluids with a large
contrast in viscosities. Mechanical instabilities such as wormhole growth and viscous fingering have been shown to develop
during the injection.
A design model coupling the fracture geometry to the diffusion mechanisms, such as heat and mass transfer, is presented. The model allows the simulation of both multi-stage
injection treatments, with alternating stages of pad and acid,
and gelled acid treatments.
A comparison between the two types of stimulation is performed. The implications on fracture conductivity after closure are analyzed based on different models of closure on
etched channels in elastic and elastoplastic media. Guidelines for designing treatments in those formations are given,
as well as a comparison with proppant injection.
SPE 18978
w
e
a w u
dC
re
--dx -
KqLC
(1)
For Npe
:::; 0.5:
(2)
while for 0.9
Npe
C:::
2':: Npe
2':: 0.5:
0.5+(xan-0.5)-1.4(xan-0.5) 2 +6.4(xan-0.5) 3
(3)
Considering for instance the first case leads to the simple relation (valid for low leakoff only; for higher leakoff, Equation
3 should be used), with which the acid penetration distance
x fa can be estimated:
w2
(4)
Xfa = 1l 00 - 4Deff
(5)
~for
a PKN
(6)
Equation 6 provides an insight on the effects of the different injection variables. Among them, two factors are crucial:
the injection rate (generally expressed per unit of fracture
height), and the fluid diffusivity. The first affects the penetration distance also through the hydraulic width. Using a
typical fracture width of 0.25 in. (6.3 mm), an injection rate
of 0.3 bbl/min/ft of fracture height (0.156 m 3 /min/m), and a
diffusivity of 3 x 10- 4 cm 2 js, leads to an acid penetration of
220 ft. Due to the higher acid leakoff and lower acid viscosity, the fracture width should decrease during the injection
of acid, hence the pad volume should be designed for larger
widths than the one used for calculation of the acid penetration distance (generally up to 50 percent larger widths).
the fracture. This is done explicitly (i.e. there are no iterations between the geometry and acid module) to improve
the computational time. The second model is a finite difference three-dimensional reservoir simulator 12 including the
effect of stresses, formation embedment strength, and variable conductivity.
SPE 18978
down. Although comprehensive models can be used to account for the heat of reaction/ 6 a simpler approach is used
here. Generally, fracturing temperatures profiles follow a bilinear variation. 17 Using a numerical model, it is shown in
our study that the dimensionless distance along the fracture
at which the formation temperature is reached depends essentially on the efficiency and the fracture model type. This
dependency is shown in Fig. 1 which clearly indicates that a
KGD-type geometry leads to cooler fracture because of the
larger widths. Considering as an example an efficiency for
the pad of 0.3, and a PKN geometry leads to a dimensionless temperature penetration of 0.3. Hence the pad should
be designed for a length that is a multiple of the desired add
penetration distance. Given these two constraints for the pad
volume, and a maximum allowable excess pressure during the
pad injection, the pad can be designed for. The acid volume
can be easily determined using a simple calculation of the
average etched width. For low efficiency acids, one needs to
compensate for acid spending in the formation through wormholes, and heterogeneities along the fracture, hence the acid
volume should generally be overdesigned by a factor of 2-3.
If these acid volumes lead to an excessive decrease in fracture
width, the previous volumes should be split into alternating
stages of pad acid.
The second factor controlling the acid penetration distance is the eventual retardation of the reaction at the
fracture surface due to the creation of a film, which is the
case for oil-outside-emulsions. This is generally difficult
to control precisely, and to avoid creating fractures that
are unetched near the well bore, the combination of these
emulsions with tail-in straight acids is strongly recommended. Gelling the acid leads to adverse mechanisms:
- the greater viscosity induces larger fracture widths,
and decreases the creation of eddies near the walls,
hence tends to decrease the acid transfer rate;
- a shear thinning near the walls, and a decrease in
the thickness of the diffusion layer tend to accelerate
the transfer of acid to the surface;
- leakoff of most gelled acids has characteristics similar to the straight acids, with creation of wormholes.
ACID RETARDATION
VISCOUS FINGERING
When multiple stages of pad fluid and acid are injected,
and because of the generally lower acid viscosity, instabilities known as viscous fingers occur. Such fingers influence
both the acid penetration and the pressure drop at the wellbore. The existence of these fingers in conditions similar to
acid fracturing has been recognized as early as 1958, with the
SPE 18978
by Davies et al.. 25 Due to the randomness of the fingers, attempts to use classical fluid mechanics approaches to predict
the fluid flow behavior in the fracture have not been successful. Recently, statistical (or stochastic) approaches have
been used by Patterson 26 and Nittmann et al., 27 and the latter show that for a slot geometry the "fractal" dimension of
these fingers decreases and tends toward unity when fingers
grow. This result, although important, is only qualitative,
and it does not allow a prediction of the finger extent.
512
32
SPE 18978
the variable conductivity along the fracture may also imply a modification of the techniques currently 11secl for poststimulation interpretation. 33 If the choice has to be made between a proppant and an acid fracturing treatment, it is recommended to perform a Net Present Value (NPV) analysis
taking into account the three components:
The same volume of acid as in the previous case is injected, but it is spread over two acid stages alternating
with pad stages.
Use of a system preventing wormhole growth
The system decribed by Crowe et al.U was used, with
a less viscous non-reactive fluid as a pad (the lower viscosity is prefered to get a longer fracture, hence more
cool down). The acid used is gelled and does prevent the
growth of wormholes.
Staging of oil-acid emulsion with acid
Finally, an emulsion with an external phase of oil was
used ahead of a straight acid.
Results
Limestone Formation
EXAMPLE DESIGN
Dolomite Case
Treahnents
Figure 10 shows the etched width profiles for the different
treatments. A characteristic in this case is the "bell" shape
distribution, with a maximum conductivity away from the
wellbore. This feature is due to the lower temperatures near
the wellbore leading for a dolomite to a reaction-limited behavior. BenN aceur and Economides 10 gave formulae allowing
the estimation of post-stimulation production for these conductivity distributions based on the use of a harmonic mean.
The greatest penetration distance was obtained again with
the combination of emulsion and acid, but, because of the
excessive retardation provided by the emulsion, the etched
Gelled acid
200 bbl of gelled acid are injected. The particular gelled
acid did not provide retardation and did not prevent
wormhole growth.
513
2. Cleary, M.P.: "Comprehensive Design Formulae in Hydraulic Fracturing", paper SPE 9259, 1980.
3. Nolte, K.G.: "Determination of Proppant and Fluid
Schedules from Fracturing Pressure Analysis,", SPEPE,
1986, 255-265.
4. Veatch, R.W.: "Economics of Fracturing: Some Methods, Examples, and Case Studies," paper SPE 15509,
1986.
5. Meng, H.Z. and Brown, ICE.: "Coupling of Production, Forecasting, Fracture Geometry Requirements and
Treatment Scheduling in the Optimum Hydraulic Fracture Design," paper SPE 16435, 1987.
6. Nolte, K.G.: "Determination of Fracture Parameters
from Fracturing Pressure Decline Analysis,", paper SPE
8341, 1979.
7. Nolte, I<.G. and Smith, M.B.: "Interpretation of Fracturing Pressures,", JPT, 1981, 1767-75.
8. Much, M. and Penny, G.: "Long- Term Performance of
Proppant Under Simulated Reservoir Conditions," paper
SPE 16415 , 1987.
9. Ben-Naceur, K. and Economides, M.J.: "The Effectiveness of Acid Fractures and their Production Behavior,",
paper SPE 18536, 1988.
10. Ben-Naceur, K. and Economides, M.J.: "Acid Fracture
Propagation and Production,", Ch. 18 in Reservoir
Stimulation, M.J. Economides and K.G. Nolte (Eels.)
2nd Edition, Prentice Hall, NY, 1989.
11. Crowe, C., Hutchinson, B. and Trit.tipo, B.: "Fluid Loss
Control: The Key to Successful Acid Fracturing," paper
SPE 16883, 1987.
12. Settari, A.: "Fra.cwell: a Three-Dimensional Reservoir
Simulator,", Unpublished Documentation, Simtech, Ca.gary, 1987.
CONCLUSIONS
A numerical model coupling fracture propagation and reaction mechanisms has been used to show the importance of
the different mechanisms in acid fracturing. Viscous fingering can be represented using a one-dimensional approximation based on fractional flow, while wormhole development
was simulated using the notion of acid efficiency.
Design rules have been presented for a calculation of the
required pad and acid volumes. In addition, several types
of add fracturing treatments were compared for a limestone
and dolomite. Best results were obtained with the use of a
high efficiency acid, combination of emulsions and acid, and
alternated stages of pad and acids. Finally, a comparison of
performance from acid and proppant fracturing treatments
was offered, allowing the selection of the most appropriate
treatment.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors wish to thank Dr E. Touboul for fruitful discussions on viscous instabilities, and the management of Dowell Schlumberger for permission to publish this paper.
NOMENCLATURE
acid concentration
average acid concentration
Deff= effective diffusivity constant
Fcv= dimensionless fracture conductivity
fracture height
h
Npe = leakoff Peclet number
injection rate
qi
leakoff velocity
ql
velocity in the fracture
U:n
fracture length
acidized length
dimensionless acid penetration distance
hydraulic fracture width
etched width
etched width rate
()
r
K
cP
a'
SPE 18978
14. Roberts, L.D. and Guin, J.A.: "A New Method for Predicting Acid Penetration Distance," SPEJ, 197.5, 277286.
15. Lo, H.H. and Dean, R.H.: "Modeling of Acid Fracturing", paper SPE 17110, 1988.
16. Lee, M.H. and Roberts, L.D.: "The Effect of Heat of
Reaction on Temperature Distribution and Acid Penetration in a Fracture,", SPEJ, 1980, 501-507.
17. Biot, M.A., Medlin, W. and Masse, L.: "Temperature
Analysis in Hydraulic Fracturing,", JPT, 1987, 13891397.
18. Settari, A.: "A New general Model of Fluid Loss in Hydraulic Fracturing", paper SPE 11625, 1983.
References
20. Williams, B.B., Gidley, J.L. and Schechter, R.S.: "Acidizing Fundamentals", SPE Monograph Volume 6, Dallas,
1979.
SPE 18978
21. Crowe, C., McGowan, G.R. and Baranet, S.E.: "Investigation of Retarded Acids Provides Better Understanding of Their Effectiveness and Potential Benefits," paper
SPE 18222, 1988.
Parameter
515
Value
50ft
50 ft
6.5 E+06 Psi
1 md
10%
20 bbl/min
0.0018 ft/min~
30 cp
1 cp
1 cp
80 bbl
130 bbl
100 bbl
170 bbl
SPE 18978
TABLE 2
Data for Comparison of Treatments
Value
Parameter
::I
'ltjQl
.... u
---~
KGDI Model
- - PKN Model
Ole:
C. til
E'li.i 0.6
50 ft.
50 ft.
6.5 E+06 Psi
1 md
10 %
95%
20 bbl/min
0.0018 ft./min~
30 cp
20 %in volume
~5
(J)c:
(J)0
Q):.;:i
-til
c: ....
aQ)
VIC:
C:Q)
~'-,
0.4
...............
~ .........
~o._
r"-_
C5
0.2
1--~
0.1
0.2
0.3
~----
r--
.............
-- --
0.5
0.6
0.4
Efficiency, '1J
0.7
0.8
0.9
~rea!_~~!- 1 (Sin~!~-~<:_i_d_:_!l~-~=~~l~e_clJ
Volume injected
200 bbl
200 bbl
200 bbl
200 bbl
injected
injected
injected
injected
(pad)
(acid)
(pad)
( ac.id)
140 bbl
100 bbl
80 bbl
120 bbl
100 bbl
200 bbl
120 bbl
120 bbl
516
SPE 18978
1000
- - PLon-Like
Fractional Flow
~
800
600
"iii
a.
<1
~I'
~' ..
'\
I'
400
r-.....'-- -
"iii
a.
<1
200
6
t (min)
10
12
20L-----~--~---L~~-L~-L------~--~~~
10
t (min)
Fig. 5-Excess Pressure Plot for Multiple Fluids Injection (Radial Geometry).
--Actual
---Pad Only
0.8~------~--------r--------+--------+-------~
(e)
0.6~------4--------+--------+--------r------~
!=""
>.
u
c
Q)
c:;
:E
0.4~~~--~--------r--------+--------+-------~
(g)
OL-------~------~------~------~------~
100~---~-~~~--~~~~~--------~--~
10
10
15
t (min)
Fig. 6-Efficiency vs Time for Multiple Fluids Injection.
Fig. 4-Excess Pressure Plot for Multiple Fluids Injection (PKN Geometry).
517
20
25
SPE 18978
10
0.35
100~------~-------,--------~-------.--------,
- - - Fco Values
- - a ' Values
0.20
1\
\\
0.15
,____...,.,~
0.25
Q)
$:
...................
0.10
0.1
- - - - Acid
- - - Gelled Acid
- - Pad-Acid
- - Multiple Stages
.............. High Efficiency Acid- - - - - Emulsion-Acid
;'~~\
. I
0.30 1\
0.05
0.00
0
~,......
\\\~ <. .
50
100
.....
150
Xf (ft)
--
200
250
300
0.001~~~~W-~~~~--~~~a_~~U.Ull--~-U~
0.001
0.01
0.1
10
Fig. 9-Etched Width Profiles for Different Injection Scenarios. Limestone Formation at 200 F.
100
toxf
--Acid
Gelled Acid
- - Pad-Acid
- Multiple Stages
0 .141-------1,-----i--'r------1:-------~t--- -
..
...
O.OOOL____5.L0____1....L0_0--~~15.LO___::......~......:..w..,..,..2~5':'::0:---~300
Xf
(ft}
Fig. 10-Etched Width Profiles for Different Injection Scenarios. Dolomite Formation at 150F.
Fig. a-Comparison between Acid Fracture and Proppant Fracture Type
Curves-Formation Embedment Strength = 60,000 psi.
518