Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Contents
Introduction
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
I would like to thank my teacher of Hindu Law, Mrs. Nuzhat Parveen Khan,
for helping me with my project.
I want to give special thanks to the librarian of my university who made
every relevant material regarding my topic available to me at the time of my
research work and gave me assistance.
I would also like to thank my family and friends for their constant support
and guidance for this project.
INTRODUCTION:
The provisions relating to lay-off and retrenchment were instered into the
Industrial Dispute Act 1947 By the Ammendment Act of 1953. The
provisions relating to closure of an undertaking were similarly inserted into
the legislation by the Amendment Act of 1956. Later in 1982, these areas
underwent several amendments pertaining to aspects relating to the
definition clause, restrictions and amount of compensation. Perhaps India is
unique in the world in requiring the prior permission of the state in certain
circumstances for lay-off , retrenchment or closure by an employer. The
underlying philosophy is that when the state is providing every facility to an
employer to start an industry, it is incumbent upon the employer to be under
the State's control in respect of these eventualities. The law aims to provide
some account of social security to the workers who may be rendered jobless
either temporarily or permanently in order to preserve their purchasing
power.
The law relating to lay-off, retrenchment and closure has been subjected to
judicial scrunity from time to time and has undergone various judicial
interpretations. This area has proved to be most controversial because it
interferes with the freedom of the employer to dispose of his capital and
labour as he wills.
The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 came into operation on the 1st day
of April, 1947. The object of all labour legislation is to ensure fair wages and to prevent disputes so that
production might not be adversely affected in Banaras Ice Factory Ltd. v Its Workmen.
In Workmen of Dimakuchi Tea Estate v/s Management of Dimakuchi Tea Estate, Supreme Court has
analyzed the following :
(1) The Promotion of measures for securing amity and good relations
between the employer and workmen;
(2) An Investigation and settlement of industrial disputes between employers
and employers , employers and workmen or workmen and workmen with a
right of representation by a registered Trade Union or Federation of Trade
Unions or Association of employers or a federation of association of
employers
(3) The prevention of illegal strikes and lock-outs;
(4) Relief to workmen in the matter of lay-off, retrenchment and closure of
an undertaking;
(5) Collective bargaining.