Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
INTRODUCTION
In recent years m a n y Swiss railway tunnels have had
to be repaired due to damage caused by swelling rocks.
I n new highway tunnels swelling rocks have also caused
great difficulties (Grob, 1976; Einstein, 1979). The rock
m o v e m e n t in the tunnels is mostly in the form of heave
of the floor, followed by a convergence of the abutments. From laboratory tests and in-situ observations
it is known that the prevention of swelling strains induces considerable compressive stresses, the so-called
swelling pressure. Swiss rocks particularly susceptible
to swelling are Tertiary marlstones (molasse) which
contain ~30% montmorillonite in the clay fraction,
the Triassic Keuper shale which contains corrensite
and anhydrite, and a lower Dogger opalinum shale
(named after the ammonite Leioceras opalinum) containing mixed-layer minerals illite/montmorillonite.
In connection with a new tunnel project near Brugg
in northern Switzerland, the swelling pressure of 19
samples o f o p a l i n u m shale was investigated. The measurements were made on drill cores from between 15and 155-m depth. The variation of the results could
not be explained on the basis of sample depths, and it
was assumed that differences in the mineralogical composition could be the reason for the different swelling
pressures. Therefore, the mineralogical composition of
the specimens was investigated to allow the calculation
Copyright 9 1985 The Clay MineralsSociety
501
502
1)
d2y
-
p = 2nkT(cosh u -
1),
n_ = n_* exp(v_e~b/kT),
in which n+ and n = local concentrations o f p o s i t i v e
and negative ions, n+* and n_* = concentrations o f positive and negative ions far away f r o m the surface (potential = 0), u+ and p_ = valences o f the ions, e = elem e n t a r y charge, and ~k = electric potential. T h e local
density o f charge p in a distance x is
p = v+en+ - u_en_.
Because the v a l e n c e o f the ions o f the s a m e sign as
the surface charge is n o t v e r y i m p o r t a n t , u+ is a s s u m e d
to equal ~_; thus, n+* = n_* = n. Then,
0
ue(n+
n_).
(3)
(4)
which describes the local density o f charge as a hyperbolic function o f the potential. T h e local density o f
charge and the local electric potential are also related
by the Poisson e q u a t i o n
d2~b
dx 2
41r0
--,
r
d( ~
(1)
(5)
(6)
sinh y,
(ra)
where ~b0 = surface potential. In the m i d w a y plane between two clay surfaces, at a distance d f r o m either
surface, the field strength is zero. T h e potential m i d w a y
between the surfaces is ~ba, and u = ue~ba/kT.
Integrating Eq. (6a) once with the b o u n d a r y condition that for x = d, y = u a n d dy = 0 gives
d y = - ( 2 cosh y - 2 cosh u) ~
d~
(7)
yz
(2 cosh y - 2 cosh u) -~ dy = -
yo
d~ = - x d .
(;)
x d = 2 exp -
+o u, ar=ex0(
where the functions F~ and F : are o b t a i n e d using the
tables.
T h e charge o f the clay particle is a result o f cation
substitutions in the crystal. Therefore, the surface charge
o f the particle is a constant. Thus, the potential m i d w a y
between the clay surfaces u is a function o f the surface
potential z and the h a l f distance d and z is a f u n c t i o n
o f the surface charge D a n d d.
T h e surface charge D is given by
D = -
yo
p dx
dff
As y = ve~k/kT and ~ = Xx, Eq. (9) is t r a n s f o r m e d to
\ 27r ]
\d~]o"
('nkT~ ~
21r ] ( 2 c o s h z -
2cosh
u)O.5
.
~ = constant
Knowing the values o f surface charge D, ion concentration n, valence v, temperature T, and dielectric constant ~, it is possible to calculate the midway potential
u as a function o f the particle distance, and also to
calculate the repulsive pressure p as a function o f the
particle distance.
The steps o f the calculation are:
(8a-ne~ ~
~kT ]
(1)
(2)
(dye,
\-~]o
according to
d(~)
values~
acc~176
(d~) =0
Apparatus
The swelling pressure apparatus as shown in Figure
1 consisted essentially o f a loading device capable of
continuous adjustment to maintain the specimen at
constant height as the swelling process develops. The
adjustment was m a d e by tightening the upper nuts,
whereas the force required to resist the axial displacement was measured by the pressure cell. The displacement, i.e., the swelling strain, was measured by the two
503
Mineralogical investigations
F r o m the theoretical considerations, the following
parameters o f the specimen must be known in order
to calculate its swelling pressure: valence o f the counter-ions in the double layer (v), ion concentration far
away from the clay surface, i.e., pore water o f the specimen (n), surface charge o f the clay (D), and the half
distance between the clay surfaces (d). After measuring
the swelling pressure, which took about 14 days for
each sample, the valence g and the ion concentration
n were determined by analyzing the water from the cell
of the swelling pressure apparatus (Figure 1). The
amount of N a and K was measured with a flame
photometer; Ca 2 and Mg 2+ were obtained by the complexometric method. One half of the swelling specimen
was used to determine the water content by drying it
for 24 hr at 105"C. The other half o f the swelling specimen was dried at room temperature and used for
the remainder of the determinations according to Figure 2.
The external specific surface area was measured by
the one-point BET method with N 2. The specimen was
degassed for 18 hr at 150~ and 10 -6 tort before the
adsorption was measured. To ensure a representative
composition of the specimens being investigated, a mechanical sample splitter was used to divide the bulk
specimen. The external specific surface area was used
in the calculation o f the total specific surface area (external plus internal area). The carbonate content was
determined by means o f an evacuated system using the
m e t h o d o f Hutchinson and MacLennan as reported in
Piper (1944). The carbonate, mainly CaCO3, was treated with HC1; CO2 was passed into a N a O H solution,
and after precipitation with BaC12, it was determined
by titration. The carbonate content was used to recalculate the original sample composition after determining the size o f clay fraction from the decarbonated
sample.
Before the amount o f the clay fraction (<0.002 mm)
was obtained by the pipet-method, it was necessary to
eliminate the carbonates. F o r this purpose ~ 5 g o f
sample was treated for 10 min in an ultrasonic bath
with a frequency o f 28 kHz and an amplitude o f 0.028
m m (MiiUer-Vonmoos, 1971), and then boiled in a p H
5 sodium acetate-acetic buffer solution. After removing the organic matter with H202, the noncrystalline
504
Determinations
water
{ amount of Na"
I amount of K
{ amount ~- C& 2 ]~
t amount of Mg.2
swelling specimen
{
crushing < 2mm
sample' dividing
removal of
I
texture
r external surface
BET
IF{
ultrasonics
decarbonating
k
- fraction ~ 0.002 mm
I
removal of organic
matter
water content
general x-ray
investigation
ir
half distance d
I [ carbonate content
t amount - 0,002 mm
,j
I
,
x-ray
tota~ surface
(glycerol)
surface charge D
J cation exch
Clay data
The determination of the a m o u n t of Na +, K +, Ca2+,
and Mg 2+ from the water in the swelling pressure cell
lllit~
001
K~o1,.it~
ooi
Chlor
<
HydrazinktoJ?nite
~?
Chlorite 00e
<
W
505
-40
~112~
M~~
l~176 mLo
11010lite
[Ihte Chlo,~te
O0
-35A
W
o,~te
Cblor~t~
00z
O 9
30
zo
(3.
Z
rr
iii
FX
?o
20
35
AMOUNT<0.002 mm [%]
Figure 3. External specific surface area as a function of the
size of the clay fraction.
m2/g (mean value 135 m//g). The cation-exchange capacity of the clay fraction varied from 28 to 34 meq/
100 g with a mean value of 31 meq/100 g.
Swelling data
The swelling test took about 14 days for each sample.
After this time, no further swelling strain was observed,
and equilibrium was assumed to have been established
between the pore water in the sample and the water in
the cell of the apparatus. The incremental values of
stress, Acq, and observed strain, A~i, are represented as
a summation curve for one sample in Figure 5. The
value of stress a* at which no further swelling strain
was observed was designated the swelling pressure. The
swelling pressure of the 19 investigated cores was between 0.7 and 2.2 N / r a m 2 (Table 1). (1 N e w t o n / m m 2 =
142 lb/sq in.)
DOUBLE LAYER CALCULATIONS
The following data were chosen for the calculation
of the swelling pressure function p(d): valence, v = 1;
ion concentration, n = 10 -z m m o l e / c m 3 = 6.02 x l 0 is
ions/cm3; specific surface area o f clay fraction, 135 mV
g; and cation-exchange capacity, 31 meq/100 g. The
constants are: k = Boltzmann constant = 1.38 x 10 -'6
o*
0.8-
tie i
O.4-
005
0.10
0.15
a20
506
erg/~ E = dielectric constant o f water = 80; e = elem e n t a r y charge = 4.80 x 10 ~o esu; and T = absolute
t e m p e r a t u r e = 293~ (20~
T h e m e a n value o f the specific surface charge, D, o f
the clay fraction was c o m p u t e d f r o m the specific surface area a n d the cation-exchange capacity (CEC) as
follows:
area per ion =
2 exp -
2
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
0.7358
0.4463
0.3475
0.2707
0.2108
0.1642
F2
xd
d(A)
1.5788
1.5725
1.5718
1.5714
1.5712
1.5710
0.07122
0.11707
0.14988
0.1915
0.2440
0.3095
1.1093
0.6496
0.4941
0.3735
0.2798
0.2071
33.8
19.8
15.1
11.4
8.5
6.3
= 72 x 10 -16 cm2/ion,
D - charge
area
4.80 x 10 -10 esu
72 x 10 -16 c m 2
= 6.7 x 104 e s u / c m 2.
T h e v a l u e u(d) was calculated from:
X
F~
= (8~rnCv2'/~
\ ekT ]
= 328 x 1 0 4 c m -1
and
d(~) _ 4freuD
o
~kT-----~- 38.1.
T h e v a l u e o f z for chosen values o f u was calculated
from:
__u
p ( d y n / c m 2)
d (A)
2
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
0.134
0.441
0.758
1.28
2.14
3.56
33.8
19.8
15.1
11.4
8.5
6.3
10 7
107
107
107
107
107
dyn/cm
2 =
N / m m 2.
and
cosh z = 0.5
+ cosh u,
0
cosh u
cosh z
2
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
3.7622
10.0677
16.5728
27.3082
45.0141
74.2099
729.5672
735.8727
742.3768
753.1132
770.8191
800.0149
7.2856
7.2942
7.3030
7.3174
7.3406
7.3778
d---
507
Table 1. Mineralogical data and swelling pressure for the lower Dogger opalinum shale from northern Switzerland.
Sample
H20t
(%)
Carbonaw
con~nt
(%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
8.3
8.3
7.5
8.3
7.6
7.0
7.9
6.6
7.2
6.8
7.1
7.8
6.3
6.7
6.9
6.7
8.2
7.1
7.2
13
12
12
12
12
11
7
10
9
11
9
17
18
10
11
7
8
9
16
Clay fraction
(%)
45
52
51
46
45
45
49
57
56
59
58
43
38
46
51
55
48
51
37
+ 1
+ 1
+ 1
+ 1
+ 1
+ !
+ 1
+ 1
+ 1
+ 1
+_ 1
+ 1
___ 1
+ 1
+ 1
+ 1
+ 1
+ 1
+ 1
External
surface
area 2
(m2/g)
29
32
29
31
29
25
30
36
34
37
35
27
23
28
32
33
28
31
22
Surface area of
clay fraction 3
(m2/g)
135
135
135
135
135
135
135
135
135
135
135
135
135
135
135
135
135
135
135
_+ 5
+ 5
+ 5
+ 5
+ 5
___5
+ 5
+ 5
+ 5
+ 5
+ 5
+ 5
+ 5
+ 5
+ 5
+ 5
_+ 5
+ 5
__+5
Surface area
of sample
(m2/g)
Half distance
(A)
Swelling
pressure
calculated
(N/mm 2)
Swelling
pressure
measured
(N/mm 2)
64.4-57.2
74.2--66.3
72.8--65.0
65.8-58.5
64.4-57.2
64.4-57.2
70.0-62.4
81.2-72.8
79.8-71.5
84.0-75.4
82.6-74.1
61.6-54.6
54.6-48.1
65.8-58.5
72.8--65.0
78.4-70.2
68.6-61.1
72.8-65.0
53.2--46.8
12.9-14.5
11.2-12.5
10.3-11.5
12.6-14.2
11.8-13.3
10.9-12.2
11.3-12.7
8.1-9.1
9.0-10.1
8.1-9.0
8.6--9.6
12.7-14.3
11.5-13.1
10.2-11.5
9.5-10.6
8.5-9.5
12.0-13.4
9.8-10.9
13.5-15.4
1.0--0.8
1.3-1.1
1.6-1.3
1.1--0.8
1.2-1.0
1.4-1.1
1.3-1.1
2.3-1.9
2.0-1.6
2.3-1.9
2.1-1.7
1.1--0.8
1.3-1.0
1.6-1.3
1.8-1.5
2.1-1.7
1.2-0.9
1.7-1.4
1.0-0.7
0.7
1.3
1.6
0.8
1.2
1.4
1.3
1.3
2.0
1.7
1.0
0.8
1.2
1.5
1.7
2.0
0.8
2.2
0.7
0.083 c m a / g
64.4 x 104 cm2/g
12.9
10 - s c m
= 12.9/~.
T h e m a x i m u m d was c a l c u l a t e d to b e 14.5 ~ . T h e s e
v a l u e s give a r a n g e o f t h e swelling p r e s s u r e p (Figure
6) o f 1.0 to 0.8 N / m m 2 (142 to 114 l b / s q in.). Figure
6 also s u m m a r i z e s t h e v a l u e s o f t h e m e a s u r e d swelling
p r e s s u r e ~* as a f u n c t i o n o f t h e c a l c u l a t e d h a l f d i s t a n c e
d. T h e v a l u e s o f d are d r a w n as s m a l l b a r s a c c o r d i n g
to t h e a b o v e - m e n t i o n e d r a n g e o f u n c e r t a i n t y . T h e values are also listed i n T a b l e 1.
DISCUSSION
T h e G o u y t h e o r y was u s e d i n t h e u n c o r r e c t e d f o r m
to calculate t h e swelling p r e s s u r e f u n c t i o n p(d). Bolt
(1955) p r e s e n t e d a c o r r e c t e d f o r m o f t h e t h e o r y b y
a d d i n g several s e c o n d a r y energy t e r m s to t h e p r i m a r y
p o t e n t i a l energy t e r m for t h e i o n i n t h e electric field o f
t h e d o u b l e layer. T h e u n c o r r e c t e d f o r m , h o w e v e r , gives
results a l m o s t i d e n t i c a l w i t h t h o s e o f t h e c o r r e c t e d t h e o r y w h e n a p p l i e d t o t h e p r o b l e m o f d o u b l e layer in-
508
RESF? p
2.0
t~
c~
w
~ 1.5"
t-
-- ~_
CALCULATED
~
1.0w
m
0.5
10
1;
2'0
HALF DISTANCE [~,1
2'5
30"-
Bolt, G. H. (1955) Analysis of the validity of the GouyChapman theory of the electric double layer: J. Colloid Sci.
1O, 206-219.
Bolt, G. H. (1956) Physico-chemical analysis of the compressibility of pure days: Geotechnique 6, 86-93.
Brindley, G. W. (1966) Ethylene glycol and glycerol complexes of smectites and vermiculites: Clay Miner. 6, 237259.
Brown, G., ed. (1961) The X-ray Identification and Crystal
Structures of Clay Minerals: Mineralogical Society, London, 393-445.
Chapman, D. L. (1913) A contribution to the theory of
electrocapillarity: Phil, Mag. 25, 475-481.
Einstein, H. H. (1979) Tunneling in swelling rock: Underground Space 4, 51-61.
Fiichthauer, H. (1959) Zur Nomenklatur der Sedimentgesteine: Erdtl Kohle 8, 605-613.
Gouy, G. (1910) Sur la constitution de la charge 61ectrique
&la surface d'un 61ectrolyte: J. Physique 9, 457-468.
Gouy, G. (1917) Sur la fonction 61ectrocapillaire:Ann. Phys.
(Paris), S#rie 9 7, 129-184.
Grob, H. (1976) Swelling and heave in Swiss tunnels: Bull.
Int. Ass. Engng. Geol. 13, 55-60.
International Society for Rock Mechanics (1979) Commission on Standardizationof Laboratory and Field Tests: Suggested methods for determining swelling and slake-durability index properties: Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 16,
141-156.
Jahnke, E. and Emde, F. (1933) Tables of Functions: B. G.
Teubner, Leipzig and Berlin, 124-144.
Langmuir, I. (1938) The role of attractive and repulsive
forces in the formation oftactoids, thixotropic gels, protein
crystals, and coacervates: J. Chem. Phys. 6, 873-896.
Mackenzie, R.C. (1951) A micromethod for determination
of cation-exchange capacity of clay: J. Colloid Sci. 6, 219222.
Madsen, F. T. (1977) Surface area measurements of clay
minerals by glycerol sorption on a thermobalance: Thermochimica Acta 21, 89-93.
509