Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
I.
INTRODUCTION
www.ijaert.org
NONSUBSAMPLED
TRANSFORM
II.
CONTOURLET
III.
REDUCED PULSE COUPLED NEURAL
NETWORK
The Pulse Coupled Neural Network (PCNN) is a
biological model based on the mammalian visual cortex,
expressed by Eckhorn [5]. The PCNN is advisable to
solve tasks as the feature generation for image and pattern
recognition, etc.
Structure of PCNN:
The structure of standard PCNN comes out from structure
of an image, which is processed. That means PCNN is
single layered, 2-D, laterally connected neural network of
www.ijaert.org
IV.
(1)
Li,j[n] =k,lWi,j,k,lYi,j[n 1]
(2)
(3)
Yi,j[n] =
1,
,
, [] > , [ 1]
NEURO-FUZZY
V.
METHODOLOGY
(4)
(5)
www.ijaert.org
LAEIs,d(BIs,d(i,j))=
BIs,d(m,n)2 (6)
=1
=1
LIE(BIs,d(i, j)) = - p(BIs,d(i, j)) log2 p(BIs,d(i, j))
=2((
=1-2(
(9)
Where,
b1 = average(LAEIs,d),
c1 = b1 + max(|b1 max(LAEIs,d)|, |b1 min(LAEIs,d)|),
a1 = 2b1 c1,
and similarly,
b2= average(LIEIs,d),
c2 = b2 + max(|b2 max(LIEIs,d)|,|b2 min(LIEIs,d)|), a2 =
2b2 c2 .
Here, bk is the cross-overpoint, ck is the shoulder point,
and ak is the feet point of S-type membership curve, k =
1, 2 (considering the two source images). The linking
strength s,d,Ii,j corresponding to the coefficientBIs,d(i, j) is
then computed as follows:
s,d,Ii,j= max(1 (BIs,d(i, j)), 2 (BIs,d(i, j))).
(10)
(7)
1(BIs,d(i,j))=0, LAEIs,d(i, j) a1
LAE Is,d (i,j )a1
)^2,a1LAEIs,d(i,
c1a1
=1-2(
=1, LAEIs,d(i, j) c1
And
b2LAEIs,d(i,j)c2
=1, LAEIs,d(i, j) c2
= 2(
j)b2
j)b1
b1LAEIs,d(i,j)c1
(8)
=1
Ys,d,Ii,j[n],I = (A,B).
VI.
EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
(12)
B. Subjective analysis:
We have subjectively evaluated the effectiveness of the method used. All the results are displayed as shown below:
www.ijaert.org
(A)
(B)
(C)
(D)
(E)
(G)
(H)
(K)
(F)
(I)
(L)
(J)
(M)
Fig.4. Visual result of 1 group of source images: CT and MRI images (A) and (B) respectively. Low pass sub-band
images of the source images (C) and (D) respectively. (E), (F), (G), (H), (I), (J) represent high pass sub-band images of
the source images. (K) And (L) represent fusion of all low pass sub-band images and fusion of high pass sub-band images
respectively. Final fused image is obtained: (M).
Table I
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF SYSTEM
Source image
SF
A 0.4248
Fused image
www.ijaert.org
EN
2.2249
STD
SF
80.9892 121.8
391
EN
6.769
5
STD
91.05
01
B 0.3529
6.6328
90.9462
VII.
CONCLUSION
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
We would like to thank Dr. Vinod Pande (Senior
Manager - Diagnostics & Imaging, Sahyadri Hospitals
Pune, India) for guiding us and for the subjective
evaluation of the fusion results.
We would also like to thank Prof. V. N. Ghodke (Our
Guide and Prof. at AISSMS IOIT, Pune, India) for
guiding and helping us.
REFERENCES
www.ijaert.org
AUTHORS PROFILE
RajshreeBhoir is from department of Electronics &
Tele-communication at AISSMS Institute of Information
Technology, Pune.
www.ijaert.org