Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
IB Extended Essay
Information Booklet for Students
Name:
Deadline
Monday 3rd December 2012
1
Table of Contents
Section
Page(s)
Acknowledgements
4-5
6-10
10-11
Assessment Criteria
12-15
16-18
19-20
21-22
My Notes
23
Acknowledgements
Many thanks to Mrs. Jocelyn Blink for the use of many previous
documents used at VIS
26/3
I have visited the library and spoken to the librarian about looking for
sources in the VIS Library and databases
30/3
20/4
27/4
4/5
25/5
Selecting a title:
I have spoken to the librarian about resources available on my topic.
01/6
11/6
15/6
22/6
22/6
Summer work:
During the summer I have spent 20 to 25 hours working on my EE and
have completed the first go
I have compared my essay to the assessment criteria and made any
changes necessary to ensure it meets the demands of the IBO.
I have checked my work for spelling, punctuation and grammar
errors, and ensured that it does not exceed the word count.
First Go deadline Checkpoint 5. I have uploaded a copy of my First
Go to the ManageBAC system and provided a paper copy to the
IBDP Office
August
2012
August
2012
August
2012
31/8
21/9
15/10
15/10
09/11
Finishing touches:
I have written an abstract of less than 300 words.
I have ensured that my essay conforms to the presentation standards
set out in the IBO guidelines.
I have handed in my final essay and a copy has been uploaded to
ManageBAC. Checkpoint 7.
23/11
23/11
03/12
4pm
You cant submit the same piece of work, or two versions of the same work, to meet the
requirements of both the EE and another assessment component of a subject contributing
to the Diploma (eg. a student can not submit an Extended Essay on the same topic as their
Group 4 Project, nor on a topic set for an English Oral Examination).
What does my supervisor do?
You will be supervised by a member of staff who is a subject specialist in the area you have
chosen. In order that we provide adequate and consistent supervision, no teacher will be
able to supervise more than 7 students. The supervisors main responsibilities will be:
Although your supervisor will guide you through the process, you will be required to decide
on the topic, the research question and develop your own ideas. Your supervisor must
ensure that the chosen research question satisfies appropriate legal and ethical standards
with regard to health and safety, confidentiality, human rights, animal welfare and
environmental issues.
The supervisor is encouraged to read and comment on the first go and the draft of the
extended essay, but is not permitted to edit these drafts for you. It is your responsibility to
correct mistakes and check the accuracy of the contents of the extended essay.
How will supervisors be allocated?
There are approximately 130 students who will need supervisors. Students require a
supervisor from one of their chosen subjects, yet to provide adequate supervision,
supervisors are restricted to 7 candidates. Obviously, if 40 students wanted to complete an
Extended Essay in Psychology we would not be able to accommodate this under the
restriction. The procedure will therefore be as follows:
Students will state their 3 preferences for an Extended Essay from the list provided
(students are strongly encouraged to select a Higher Level subject but should also
read the recommended prerequisites).
If the number of students opting for a subject exceeds the maximum number (7 x
no. of staff), then a random selection will be made. Those students not randomly
selected would then be allocated their second or third choice using a similar system.
Formulate a question.
bibliography. Make sure that you can find enough information before you finalise your
research question.
4. Ground your work clearly in one subject.
Extended Essays which become transdisciplinary score very badly. Make sure your question
clearly fits into the field in which you have been entered.
5. Do not expect that finding a 'good research question' is quick, easy, or remains fixed
throughout your project
This is probably the hardest part of your Extended Essay, but if you get it right everything
else will follow! It therefore seems worth spending some time on it. It will seem frustrating
to spend a few weeks on this but only have a couple of lines of work as a result.
Nonetheless, getting this right makes gives purpose and direction to the rest of the work.
Do not alter your research question without discussing the reasons with your supervisor
and gaining their advice. You should not even consider changing your research question
after the start of the summer holidays.
For more advice look at this website:
http://www.libraries.psu.edu/instruction/infolit/andyou/mod1/pre.htm
10
Examples of Plagiarism
Using the Internet to copy and paste someone elses work into a piece of
homework/coursework.
Downloading an essay from the Internet and handing it in as ones own work
Copying the work of another student
On a piece of work like the Extended Essay many students find that they plagiarise other
peoples ideas by mistake, because they have trouble distinguishing between taking notes,
and copying or paraphrasing ideas.
It is also very important to remember to accurately record where you have found all your
information when taking notes. This will allow you to reference properly, another key skill in
ensuring that your work cannot be accused of plagiarism.
Please note that both VIS and the IB use internet software to detect cases of plagiarism.
Whether this is accidental or not, students found by the IB to have plagiarised their essay
will fail their Diploma.
11
Assessment criteria
This section provides an overview of what each criterion assesses in the extended essay.
A: research question
This criterion assesses the extent to which the purpose of the essay is specified. In many subjects, the
aim of the essay will normally be expressed as a question and, therefore, this criterion is called the
research question. However, certain disciplines may permit or encourage different ways of
formulating the research task.
Achievement level Descriptor
0
The research question is not stated in the introduction or does not lend itself to a
systematic investigation in an extended essay in the subject in which it is registered.
The research question is stated in the introduction but is not clearly expressed or is too
broad in scope to be treated effectively within the word limit.
The research question is clearly stated in the introduction and sharply focused, making
effective treatment possible within the word limit.
B: introduction
This criterion assesses the extent to which the introduction makes clear how the research question
relates to existing knowledge on the topic and explains how the topic chosen is significant and worthy
of investigation.
Achievement level Descriptor
0
Little or no attempt is made to set the research question into context. There is little or no
attempt to explain the significance of the topic.
Some attempt is made to set the research question into context. There is some attempt
to explain the significance of the topic and why it is worthy of investigation.
The context of the research question is clearly demonstrated. The introduction clearly
explains the significance of the topic and why it is worthy of investigation.
C: investigation
This criterion assesses the extent to which the investigation is planned and an appropriate range of
sources has been consulted, or data has been gathered, that is relevant to the research question.
Where the research question does not lend itself to a systematic investigation in the subject in which
the essay is registered, the maximum level that can be awarded for this criterion is 2.
Achievement level
Descriptor
There is little or no evidence that sources have been consulted or data gathered, and
little or no evidence of planning in the investigation.
A range of inappropriate sources has been consulted, or inappropriate data has been
gathered, and there is little evidence that the investigation has been planned.
A limited range of appropriate sources has been consulted, or data has been gathered,
and some relevant material has been selected. There is evidence of some planning in
the investigation.
A sufficient range of appropriate sources has been consulted, or data has been
12
gathered, and relevant material has been selected. The investigation has been
satisfactorily planned.
4
An imaginative range of appropriate sources has been consulted, or data has been
gathered, and relevant material has been carefully selected. The investigation has been
well planned.
Descriptor
The essay demonstrates some knowledge but little understanding of the topic studied.
The essay shows little awareness of an academic context for the investigation.
The essay demonstrates an adequate knowledge and some understanding of the topic
studied. The essay shows some awareness of an academic context for the investigation.
The essay demonstrates a good knowledge and understanding of the topic studied.
Where appropriate, the essay successfully outlines an academic context for the
investigation.
The essay demonstrates a very good knowledge and understanding of the topic
studied. Where appropriate, the essay clearly and precisely locates the investigation in
an academic context.
E: reasoned argument
This criterion assesses the extent to which the essay uses the material collected to present ideas in a
logical and coherent manner, and develops a reasoned argument in relation to the research question.
Where the research question does not lend itself to a systematic investigation in the subject in which
the essay is registered, the maximum level that can be awarded for this criterion is 2.
Achievement level Descriptor
0
There is a limited or superficial attempt to present ideas in a logical and coherent manner,
and to develop a reasoned argument in relation to the research question.
There is some attempt to present ideas in a logical and coherent manner, and to develop
a reasoned argument in relation to the research question, but this is only partially
successful.
Ideas are presented in a logical and coherent manner, and a reasoned argument is
developed in relation to the research question, but with some weaknesses.
Ideas are presented clearly and in a logical and coherent manner. The essay succeeds in
developing a reasoned and convincing argument in relation to the research question.
13
The essay shows little application of appropriate analytical and evaluative skills.
The essay shows some application of appropriate analytical and evaluative skills, which
may be only partially effective.
The essay shows sound application of appropriate analytical and evaluative skills.
The essay shows effective and sophisticated application of appropriate analytical and
evaluative skills.
The language used is inaccurate and unclear. There is no effective use of terminology
appropriate to the subject.
The language used sometimes communicates clearly but does not do so consistently. The
use of terminology appropriate to the subject is only partly accurate.
The language used for the most part communicates clearly. The use of terminology
appropriate to the subject is usually accurate.
The language used communicates clearly. The use of terminology appropriate to the
subject is accurate, although there may be occasional lapses.
The language used communicates clearly and precisely. Terminology appropriate to the
subject is used accurately, with skill and understanding.
H: conclusion
This criterion assesses the extent to which the essay incorporates a conclusion that is relevant to the
research question and is consistent with the evidence presented in the essay.
Achievement level Descriptor
0
A conclusion is attempted that is relevant to the research question but may not be
entirely consistent with the evidence presented in the essay.
14
I: formal presentation
This criterion assesses the extent to which the layout, organization, appearance and formal elements
of the essay consistently follow a standard format. The formal elements are: title page, table of
contents, page numbers, illustrative material, quotations, documentation (including references,
citations and bibliography) and appendices (if used).
Achievement level Descriptor
0
J: abstract
The requirements for the abstract are for it to state clearly the research question that was
investigated, how the investigation was undertaken and the conclusion(s) of the essay.
Achievement level Descriptor
0
The abstract exceeds 300 words or one or more of the required elements of an abstract
(listed above) is missing.
The abstract contains the elements listed above but they are not all clearly stated.
K: holistic judgment
The purpose of this criterion is to assess the qualities that distinguish an essay from the average, such
as intellectual initiative, depth of understanding and insight. While these qualities will be clearly
present in the best work, less successful essays may also show some evidence of them and should be
rewarded under this criterion.
Achievement level Descriptor
0
Your supervisor will provide you with subject specific guidance for the assessment
criteria.
15
A1 (This is to be done
in a students mother
tongue, and is a
literature-based
essay)
Group 2
A2 or B (For students
studying a foreign
language. These allow
students to develop
their awareness and
knowledge of the
language and their
understanding of the
culture. These are not
(usually) literaturebased essays.
Economics
Group 3
History
Geography
16
ITGS
Group 4
Students are
strongly
encouraged to
undertake
experimental
work as part
of their
research.
Biology
Chemistry
Physics
Environmental
Systems
Design Technology
Group 5
Maths
Computer Science
Group 6
Visual Arts
Theatre
17
Film
Music
18
19
20
The RQ?
The scope of the investigation?
The conclusion?
Is the abstract equal to, or fewer than 300 words?
Table of Contents
Introduction
Is there an Introduction?
Is it specifically labelled as the introduction?
Does the introduction explain why the research question is worthy of
investigation?
Is the research question clearly stated in the introduction?
Have you written the RQ in bold?
References/Sources
Is there a reference/footnote for all the information that you have taken
from somewhere?
Is there a reference/footnote for every graph/table/bit of data that you have
used?
Are the references set out consistently, with page numbers if they are from a
book, and date accessed
if they are from a website?
21
Bibliography
Is there a bibliography?
Does the bibliography include all and only the works cited in the essay?
Does the bibliography specify author(s), title, date of publication, and
publisher for each reference?
If the source is a website, have you included the name of the piece, the
author (if known), the
publication from which the piece was taken, and the date accessed?
Has a standardised and accepted method been used to present the
bibliography?
Conclusion
Is there a conclusion?
Is it specifically labelled as the conclusion?
Is the conclusion a summary, that only refers to points mentioned in the
essay (i.e. no new material)?
Does the conclusion refer to any unresolved questions and/or questions that
have emerged from the
research?
Appendices
General Points
Does the essay stay on track, presenting only information that is necessary to
answer the RQ?
Do you regularly go back to your RQ to show that you are staying on track?
Have you shown evidence of evaluative and analytical skills?
Do you show good knowledge and understanding of the material?
Is the essay equal to, or fewer than 4,000 words?
22
MY NOTES
This page is for your notes. Remember that you will need to refer back to these
throughout the EE process so make sure they are legible!
Research skills:
Question setting:
General advice:
23
24