Countertenor Voice

THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY
COLLEGE OF MUSIC
VOCAL REGISTERS OF THE COUNTERTENOR VOICE:

BASED ON SIGNALS RECORDED AND ANALYZED IN VOCEVISTA
By
RAYMOND CHENEZ
A treatise submitted to the

College of Music
in partial fulfillment of the
requirements for the degree of
Doctorate of Music
Degree Awarded:
Spring Semester, 2011
UMI Number: 3477195
All rights reserved

INFORMATION TO ALL USERS
The quality of this reproduction is dependent on the quality of the copy submitted.
In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript
and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed,
a note will indicate the deletion.
UMI 3477195
Copyright 2011 by ProQuest LLC.
All rights reserved. This edition of the work is protected against
unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code.
ProQuest LLC.
789 East Eisenhower Parkway
P.O. Box 1346
Ann Arbor, MI 48106 - 1346
The members of the committee approve the treatise of Raymond Chenez defended on March 20,
2011.
_______________________________________
Wanda Brister Rachwal
Professor Directing Treatise
_______________________________________
Seth Beckman
University Representative
_______________________________________
Roy Delp
Committee Member
_______________________________________
Larry Gerber
Committee Member
_______________________________________
David Okerlund
Committee Member
The Graduate School has verified and approved the above-named committee members.
ii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I would like to thank all the individuals who made this treatise possible. To the
countertenors who participated, Dan Bubeck, Anthony Roth Costanzo, Todd Doering, Brennan
Hall, Michael Kapinus, Nathan Medley, Reginald Mobley, Andrew Rader, Steven Rickards,
Peter Thoreson, and Jay White. Thank you for your willingness in lending your voices to this
project. I would especially like to thank Steven Rickards for his generous hospitality and help in
arranging the assistance from many of the above-mentioned singers.
To Donald Miller, I extend my thanks for your assistance during this process. Without
your research, this treatise would not have been possible.
To David Okerlund, thank you for your commitment to this project. I enjoyed all the
time spent analyzing VoceVista signals and discussing the voice. I truly appreciate your efforts
and assistance.
To my voice teachers, Wanda Brister Rachwal and Roy Delp, I would like to thank you
for everything you have given me over the past five years. You have gone above and beyond
your duties as voice teachers, and have made a lasting impact on my life.
iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
List of Figures ..................................................................................................................................v
Abstract ............................................................................................................................................x
INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 1
METHOD ...................................................................................................................................... 6
UPPER REGISTER ................................................................................................................... 19
MIDDLE REGISTERS .............................................................................................................. 31
CHEST REGISTER ................................................................................................................... 42
CONCLUSIONS ......................................................................................................................... 63
GLOSSARY ................................................................................................................................ 65
APPENDICES ............................................................................................................................. 69
A. HUMAN SUBJECTS COMMITTEE APPROVAL LETTER.......................................... 69
B. INFORMED CONSENT LETTER ...................................................................................... 71
BIBLIOGRAPHY ....................................................................................................................... 73
BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH ..................................................................................................... 75
iv
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1.1 Manuel Garcia IIs table of registers. ............................................................................ 3
Figure 1.2 Peter Giles system of registration. ............................................................................... 4
Figure 2.1. Author shown wearing EGG module, EGG neck-strap, and headset microphone. ..... 7
Figure 2.2. Octave scale from D4 to D5 on [a] by Anthony Roth Costanzo displayed in
VoceVista. View of spectrogram, power spectrum, and waveform envelope shown. .................. 8
Figure 2.3. Spectrogram extracted from Figure 2.2. ....................................................................... 9
Figure 2.4. Power spectrum extracted from Figure 2.2. ............................................................... 10
Figure 2.5. Octave scale from G4 to G5 on [a] by Steven Rickards displayed in VoceVista. View
of spectrogram, electroglottograph waveform (EGG), closed quotient history (EGG CQ), and
audio waveform shown. ................................................................................................................ 12
Figure 2.6. Electroglottograph waveform (EGG) extracted from Figure 2.5. .............................. 13
Figure 2.7. Audio waveform extracted from Figure 2.5. .............................................................. 14
Figure 2.8. Theoretical drawing of the overtone series emitted by the vocal folds prior to
filtering by the vocal tract. ............................................................................................................ 15
Figure 2.9. Power spectra of A4, sung by a soprano on an [i] vowel (signal A), and vocal fry
(signal B). ...................................................................................................................................... 16
Figure 2.10. First and second formant frequency ranges of eight vowels during speech. ............ 17
Figure 3.1. Octave scale from E4 to E5 on [a] by Andrew Rader. EGG waveforms are shown of
C#5 (A) and D#5 (B). ...................................................................................................................... 19
Figure 3.2. Octave scale from E4 to E5 on [a] by Andrew Rader. Power spectra show C#5 (A) and
D#5 (B), with cursors placed on H1. .............................................................................................. 20
D#5 (B), with cursors placed on H2. .............................................................................................. 21
v
E5 (B), with cursors placed on H1. ............................................................................................... 22
Figure 3.6. Octave scale from E4 to E5 on [a] by Dan Bubeck. Power spectra show C#5 (A) and
Figure 3.8. Octave scale from E4 to E5 on [a] by Dan Bubeck. EGG waveforms are shown of C#5
(A) and D#5 (B). ............................................................................................................................ 26
Figure 3.9. Ascending 5th from C5 to G5 on [a] by Anthony Roth Costanzo. EGG waveforms are
shown of E5 (A) and G5 (B). ......................................................................................................... 28
Figure 3.10. Ascending 5th from F5 to C6 on [a] by Todd Doering. EGG waveforms are shown of
G5 (A) and B5 (B). ......................................................................................................................... 29
Figure 3.11. EGG waveform indicating an unstable larynx. ........................................................ 30
Figure 4.1. Octave scale from D4 to D5 on [a] by Andrew Rader. Power spectra show G4 (A) and
A4 (B), with cursors placed on H2. ............................................................................................... 32
A4 (B), with cursors placed on H3. ............................................................................................... 32
Figure 4.3. Octave scale from D4 to D5 on [a] by Brennan Hall. Power spectra show F#4 (A) and
G4 (B), with cursors placed on H2. ............................................................................................... 34
G4 (B), with cursors placed on H3. ............................................................................................... 34
Figure 4.5. Excerpt from Ebbenne andro lontano, sung by Maria Callas. Power spectra are
shown of D5 (A) with cursor placed on H2, and G4 (B) with cursor placed on H3. ..................... 35
Figure 4.6. Excerpts from Un bel di, sung by Rgine Crespin (A) and Yoko Watanabe (B).
Power spectra of Ab4 are shown, with cursors placed on H3 (A) and H2 (B). ............................ 36
vi
Figure 4.7. Octave scale from A3 to A4 on [a] by Andrew Rader. Power spectra show F#4 (A)
and G4 (B), with cursors placed on H2. ........................................................................................ 37
and G4 (B), with cursors placed on H3. ........................................................................................ 38
Figure 4.9. Octave scale from D4 to D5 on [a] by Andrew Rader. EGG waveforms are shown of
G4 (A) and A4 (B). ........................................................................................................................ 39
G4 (A) and D4 (B). ........................................................................................................................ 40
Figure 4.11. Octave scale from D4 to D5 on [a] by Anthony Roth Costanzo. EGG waveforms are
shown of G4 (A) and D4 (B). ......................................................................................................... 41
Figure 5.1. Octave scale from A3 to A4 on [a] by Steven Rickards. EGG Waveforms are shown
of D4 (A) and E4 (B)...................................................................................................................... 43
Figure 5.2. Octave scale from A3 to A4 on [a] by Steven Rickards. Power spectra show D4 (A)
and E4 (B), with cursors placed on H3. ......................................................................................... 44
Figure 5.4. Octave scale from A3 to A4 on [a] by Brennan Hall. EGG Waveforms are shown of
B4 (A) and C#4 (B)......................................................................................................................... 46
Figure 5.5. Octave scale from A3 to A4 on [a] by Brennan Hall. Power spectra show B4 (A) and
C#4 (B), with cursors placed on H3. ............................................................................................. 47
C#4 (B), with cursors placed on H4. ............................................................................................. 47
Figure 5.7. Octave scale from A3 to A4 on [a] by Andrew Rader. EGG Waveforms are shown of
C#4 (A) and D4 (B). ....................................................................................................................... 48
Figure 5.8. Octave scale from A3 to A4 on [a] by Andrew Rader. Power spectra show C#4 (A)
and D4 (B), with cursors placed on H3. ........................................................................................ 49
vii
and D4 (B), with cursors placed on H4. ........................................................................................ 50
Figure 5.10. Octave scale from A3 to A4 on [a] by Reginald Mobley. EGG Waveforms are
shown of B3 (A) and C#4 (B). ........................................................................................................ 51
shown of C#4 (A) and D4 (B)......................................................................................................... 52
shown of D4 (A) and E4 (B). ......................................................................................................... 52
Figure 5.13. EGG waveform of a C4 sung by Reginald Mobley. Chest voice is shown in signal
A, head voice is shown in signal B. .............................................................................................. 53
Figure 5.14. EGG waveform of a C4 sung by Reginald Mobley. Transition from chest voice to
head voice is shown in signal A, head voice to chest voice is shown in signal B. ....................... 54
Figure 5.15. Octave scale from A3 to A4 on [a] by Reginald Mobley. Power spectra show B3 (A)
and C#4 (B), with cursors placed on H3. ....................................................................................... 55
and C#4 (B), with cursors placed on H4. ....................................................................................... 55
Figure 5.17. Octave scale from A3 to A4 on [a] by Reginald Mobley. Power spectra show C#4
(A) and D4 (B), with cursors placed on H3. .................................................................................. 56
(A) and D4 (B), with cursors placed on H4. .................................................................................. 57
Figure 5.19. Octave scale from A3 to A4 on [a] by Reginald Mobley. Power spectra show D4 (A)
Figure 5.21. Octave scale from Ab3 to Ab4 on [a] by mezzo-soprano. EGG waveforms are shown
of C4 (A) and Db4 (B). ................................................................................................................... 59
Figure 5.22. Power spectra of C4 (A) and Db4 (B) from Ab scale on [a] by mezzo-soprano. ....... 60
viii
Figure 5.23. Octave scale from A3 to A4 on [a] by Dan Bubeck. EGG waveforms are shown of
B3 (A) and A3 (B). ......................................................................................................................... 61
Figure 5.24. Octave scale from A3 to A4 on [a] by Dan Bubeck. Power spectra show B3 (A) and
C#4 (B), with cursors placed on H3. .............................................................................................. 62
C#4 (B), with cursors placed on H4. .............................................................................................. 62
Figure 6.1. Registration model for the countertenor voice. Overlapping indicates different
singers and their adjustments. ....................................................................................................... 64
ix
ABSTRACT
Todays countertenors possess vocal ranges similar to the mezzo-soprano, and are trained
to sing with a vibrant, focused tone. Little research has been conducted on the registers of the
countertenor voice. Advancement in vocal techniques in the countertenor voice from the late
20th century to the present has been rapid. This treatise attempts to define the registers of the
countertenor voice, and is intended as a resource for singers and teachers. The voices of eleven
North American countertenors were recorded and analyzed using VoceVista Pro software, which
was developed and designed by Donald Miller. Through spectrographic and electroglottographic
analysis, the registers of the countertenor voice were identified and outlined.
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
Questions often arise with regard to registers, and where they fall in the countertenor
voice. The most prominent vocal pedagogy books devote little attention to the countertenor,
including Richard Millers The Structure of Singing, William Vennards Singing: The
Mechanism and the Technic, and James McKinneys The Diagnosis and Correction of Vocal
Faults. In most books on pedagogy there is no mention of the voice type, or only a brief
paragraph is provided.
Although the use of terminology has evolved, the first significant description of registers
for the countertenor voice was written in 1841 by Manuel Garcia II in A Complete Treatise on
The Art of Singing. He describes the countertenor voice as follows:
Counter-Tenor Voice: The highest voice of the man. This clear and nimble voice,
whose range is the same as that of the contralto voice, and is composed of the same
cords, extends from
In this voice, the chest register blends very well with the falsetto register, but, although
more thin and more effeminate than all the other masculine voices, it blends poorly with
the head register, which is exclusively reserved for the woman.1
Garcias table of registration is shown in Figure 1.1. In observing his classifications for
female voices, he has placed the falsetto register in the middle of the range. It is evident his
usage of the term had different implications when he wrote the treatise than it does now. In 1894
he revised his terminology to chest, medium (falsetto for male voice), and head.2
In observing his register system for the countertenor voice, Garcia has placed it as the
highest male voice, capable of ascending past the tenor in the chest voice to B b4 with a possible
1
Manuel Garcia II, A Complete Treatise on the Art of Singing: Part One (New York: Da Capo Press,
1984), 21.
2
Clifton Ware, Basics of Vocal Pedagogy: The Foundations and Process of Singing (McGraw-Hill, 1998),
114.
extension to C5. In comparing the tenor to the countertenor, the ranges are identical in the
falsetto register. In the head register the countertenor is given a possible extension to F#5.
Garcia evidently believed in a three-register system for the countertenor, with different
options for employing chest and falsetto in the same range. In comparing this model with his
tenor model, it seems as if these voices were similar in function.
The voice of the present-day countertenor functions differently from the way it was
described by Garcia. While the countertenor employs the chest register as part of the overall
range, he uses it only for the lowest tones. The contemporary countertenor would not extend his
chest voice nearly as high as C5.
Figure 1.1 Manuel Garcia IIs table of registers.3
Garcia, 21-22.
Figure 1.2 Peter Giles system of registration.4
Giles, 176.
In 1994, the most recent system of registration in the countertenor voice was devised by
Peter Giles. Figure 1.2 compares the countertenor voice with other male and female voice-types.
In observing his countertenor model, Giles shows a wide range of register possibilities for the
voice.
Registration in the singing voice is a widely-debated subject. Among singing teachers, a
wide range of terminology and concepts still exist. While pedagogues have devised systems and
written numerous documents and books on registration for many voice types, the registers of the
countertenor voice have been addressed minimally.
Donald Miller, through recent technical advances, has provided a means to analyze the
voice. Dr. Miller began his career as an opera singer and voice teacher. He has sung over 25
leading roles, and was a professor of voice at Syracuse University for over two decades. In the
late 1970s he turned his focus toward voice science. In 1987 he devoted himself to research on
the acoustics and physiology of the singing voice as an associate of the Groningen Voice
Research Lab in the Netherlands. Dr. Miller is responsible for the design and development of
VoceVista, software first introduced in 1996.5
One of the main benefits of VoceVista has been the ability to identify register transitions,
and the elements that are involved in these transitions. The purpose of this treatise is to develop
a further understanding of registration in the countertenor voice with the use of VoceVista.
Donald Miller, Resonance in Singing: Voice Building through Acoustic Feedback (Princeton, NJ: Inside
View Press, 2008), back cover.
CHAPTER TWO
METHOD
Eleven North American countertenors were recorded and analyzed using VoceVista-Pro
software (version 3.3).6 The age of the participants ranged from 23 to 55 years. Because of this
range in age, the experience of the singers varied. At minimum, all of the participants held a
bachelors degree in music. All of the participants had professional performing experience.
Each singer was asked to sing a standard set of vocalises encompassing nearly the
entirety of his vocal range. The lowest recorded pitch was G3. This starting point was chosen to
identify the transition coming from the chest voice to the head voice. Because the modal (chest)
voice has been researched and studied at length, pitches below G3 were not recorded. The
highest recorded pitch was C6, which only one of the eleven countertenors was capable of
producing. Due to differences in vocal range, each singer did not perform every vocalise.
Each participant was instructed to warm up prior to the recording. During the process
they were given the freedom to play their own pitches from a piano before each vocalise they
were instructed to sing. No accompaniment was provided while they vocalized. Because the
purpose of this study was to analyze the best examples possible, each singer was given the
opportunity to record an exercise as many times as necessary to exemplify his best singing.
Two signals were obtained in the process: an audio signal and an electroglottograph
(EGG) waveform. The equipment used to record these signals included a Dell Inspiron 1470
laptop, Tascam USB audio interface, an EGG module, EGG neck-strap, and a headset
microphone. A photograph of this equipment is shown in Figure 2.1.
VoceVista-Pro is voice analysis software designed and developed by Donald Miller.
Figure 2.1. Author shown wearing EGG module, EGG neck-strap, and headset microphone.
All of the signals were recorded using the laptop computer while running VoceVista-Pro
software (v 3.3). The EGG module was used to process the EGG and audio signal. The
electrodes used to transmit the EGG signal were positioned on either side of each participants
larynx with a Velcro strap.
A headset microphone was used in order to maintain a consistent distance between the
singers mouth and the microphone. The headset microphone is an omnidirectional electret
microphone with a flat response in the frequency range of interest (ca. 70 to 8000 Hz). The EGG
module was inserted into the Tascam interface, which connected to the computers USB port,
and allowed for volume control over the audio and EGG signals. All of the signals were initially
recorded at a low level to prevent overloading, and were later normalized to 85% with Adobe
Audition to create a consistent standard for analysis.
The audio signal obtained through the microphone provided a spectrogram and power
spectrum in VoceVista. Figure 2.2 shows an example of a spectrogram, a power spectrum, and a
waveform envelope. This figure shows a D major scale, sung on an [a] vowel by countertenor
Anthony Roth Costanzo.
Figure 2.2. Octave scale from D4 to D5 on [a] by Anthony Roth Costanzo displayed in
VoceVista. View of spectrogram, power spectrum, and waveform envelope shown.
The spectrogram is extracted from Figure 2.2 and shown in Figure 2.3. In this example, a
D major scale is displayed. Donald Miller describes the spectrogram as reading like music from
left to right in the time dimension.7 In this example, a green vertical cursor is placed on A4 of
the scale. In the lower right, a time marker of 2507 milliseconds (ms) is displayed. This
indicates the exact moment of the sound sample in which the green cursor is placed. Miller
describes the vertical dimension of the spectrograph as follows:
The vertical dimension shows frequency. In the usual narrow-band display the
fundamental frequency, designated F0, is the lowest band. The bands above it
represent overtones, which are all integer multiples of the fundamental. For
example, if the fundamental is 220 hertz (Hz, or cycles per second), the series of
overtones is 440, 660, 880, etc. These are all harmonics, which follow the
pattern of the well-known harmonic series. The fundamental is designated H1,
H2 is an octave higher, H3 a perfect fifth above that, etc.8
Miller, 7-8.
Ibid., 7-8.
The term fundamental frequency that Dr. Miller refers to is the pitch the human ear
actually hears. For purposes of this treatise, the fundamental frequency will be referred to as
H1 (Harmonic 1). F0 can also be used as a label, but will not be used in this document. In
Figure 2.3, the fundamental frequency is shown as the lowest horizontal band. Above it are
overtones, which are labeled H2, H3, H4, etc. The colors shown in the spectrogram represent
levels of intensity (amplitude).9
Figure 2.3. Spectrogram extracted from Figure 2.2.
On the right side of Figure 2.2 is the power spectrum, which is displayed separately in
Figure 2.4. Miller describes the power spectrum as follows: The power spectrum has just two
dimensions, frequency and amplitude, displayed in the horizontal and vertical dimensions,
Ibid., 7-8.
respectively. It is best understood as a very narrow time-slice through a spectrogram.10 The

power spectrum (Figure 2.4) represents the exact moment in time in which the cursor is placed in
the spectrogram (Figure 2.3). The harmonics from the spectrogram (Figure 2.3) are displayed
from left to right in the power spectrum (Figure 2.4). Miller describes this display as showing
the series of harmonics with a precise gradation of amplitude in decibels. One can thus see
which frequency components are dominant at any given moment, and by how many decibels
they prevail over other components. 11
Figure 2.4. Power spectrum extracted from Figure 2.2.
10
Ibid., 8-9.
11
Ibid., 8-9.
10
Throughout this document, a long time average spectrum (LTAS) will be used, which
Miller describes as follows:
In addition to the narrow time-slice, the program can calculate a long time
average spectrum (LTAS) for segments up to 10 seconds. By setting the
averaging time at 200 ms (milliseconds), the display of sound in real time will
average approximately one complete vibrato cycle (based on a vibrato rate of 5
Hz), giving a more realistic impression of the balance of frequency components
that the ear is hearing in real time.12
The other signal analyzed in this treatise is the electroglottograph waveform (EGG),
which is described by Miller as follows:
The EGG is the second of the two non-invasive signals processed by VoceVista.
It is a physiological signal, allowing us to follow the vibrations of the vocal folds
that produce the primary sound at the glottis. A minute high-frequency current
runs between electrodes that are held in place on either side of the larynx. The
resistance between electrodes decreases by a small amount when the vocal folds
make contact, initiating the closed phase of the glottis. The resistance rises again
as the glottis opens. These modulations in resistance give us the EGG signal,
useful as a measure of contact between the vocal folds. 13
12
Ibid., 8-9.
13
Ibid., 9.
11
Figure 2.5. Octave scale from G4 to G5 on [a] by Steven Rickards displayed in VoceVista. View
of spectrogram, electroglottograph waveform (EGG), closed quotient history (EGG CQ), and
audio waveform shown.
Figure 2.5 is a different display of VoceVista, which shows a G major scale, sung on an
[a] vowel by countertenor Steven Rickards. This figure shows a spectrogram, electroglottograph
waveform (EGG), closed quotient history (labeled EGG CQ), and audio waveform.
The electroglottograph waveform (EGG) is extracted from Figure 2.5, and shown in
Figure 2.6. This signal can be used to calculate closed quotient (CQ), which is described by
Miller as the percentage of the glottal period where the glottis is (presumably) closed to the
passage of air.14 Three vertical cursors are displayed in this window. The first vertical cursor is
placed at the estimated moment in which the glottis closes, and the middle cursor is placed at the
estimated moment in which the glottis opens. The horizontal cursor is adjusted by the user to
align these vertical cursors, and is referred to as the criterion level (CL). 15 This process of
adjustment is aided by the audio waveform, which will be described later. In this example, the
horizontal cursor is placed at the estimated moment of glottal opening (CL=26%), and the closed
quotient (CQ) is measured at 44%.
14
Ibid., 9.
15
Ibid., 9.
12
Figure 2.6. Electroglottograph waveform (EGG) extracted from Figure 2.5.
Above the EGG signal in Figure 2.5 is the audio waveform, which shows the microphone
signal. This is the same signal that provides the spectrogram and power spectrum. The audio
waveform is extracted from Figure 2.5, and shown in Figure 2.7. This signal is useful in aligning
the EGG signal directly below it, as shown in Figure 2.5. Miller describes this process as
follows:
Care must be taken to precisely align the EGG and audio signals in the time
domain. Each closing of the glottis creates an impulse that acoustically excites
the vocal tract. There is a time delay between this closure, which is registered
immediately by the EGG, and the moment of arrival at the microphone of the
corresponding acoustic impulse. At the relatively low frequencies and intensities
of speech, the sound tends to die out between glottal impulses, making these easy
to identify in the audio waveform, particularly if the microphone is close to the
speakers mouth. In the case of a head-mounted microphone the distance the
sound travels is kept constant, and thus the delay as well.
Having the audio and EGG waveforms aligned enables one to see the
effects of the sound created by glottal closing and opening, as well as by different
magnitudes of closed quotient. It also makes clearer the difference between lowintensity speech, where the sound tends to die out in the open phase, and resonant
singing, characterized by standing waves that maintain their energy through the
open phase and into the next closing.16
16
Ibid., 10-11.
13
Figure 2.7. Audio waveform extracted from Figure 2.5.
The signals described above were used to determine where the register transitions
occurred in the countertenor voice, and the characteristics that defined these transitions. These
determinations were made by studying adjustments in CQ, and changes in the relative strength of
the harmonics displayed in the spectrogram and power spectrum.
Changes in the CQ are measured through analysis of the EGG signal. An increase or
decrease in the CQ indicates an adjustment being made by the singer at the voice source (the
vocal folds), consciously or subconsciously. Changes displayed in the spectrogram reflect the
adjustments made in the vocal tract after the harmonics have emerged from the glottis.
Within the vocal tract are naturally occurring formants, which are variable resonances of
the vocal tract.17 When considering the source spectrum of a sound before it is filtered by the
vocal tract, the amplitude of the harmonics theoretically decreases uniformly with increasing
frequency.18 In other words, Miller is theorizing that Figure 2.8 represents the overtone series
emitted by the vocal folds prior to the filtering performed by the vocal tract.
17
Ibid., 113.
18
Ibid., 24-25.
14
Figure 2.8. Theoretical drawing of the overtone series emitted by the vocal folds prior to
filtering by the vocal tract.19
Through adjustments in the vocal tract, the formants can be tuned to the harmonics
emerging from the glottis, which create distinctive peaks in the spectrogram.20
Miller explains the importance of the first two formants as follows:
When we speak of formant tuning in the singing voice, we are nearly always
talking about one or both of the two lowest formants, F1 and F2. There are two
evident reasons for this. The first is that these two formants are in the frequency
region where the harmonics emerging from the glottal source are strong;
resonating a harmonic that is intrinsically strong will have a relatively large effect
on the sound pressure levelThe second reason is that our vocal tracts are well
equipped to make rapid changes, both large and subtle, in the first two formants.21
Through glottal fry, a visual representation of the formant frequencies of a singer can be
obtained. Figure 2.9 shows the power spectrum of an A4, sung by a soprano on an [i] vowel.
The formant structure is shown in the lower portion, which was produced by a glottal fry. The
19
Ibid., figure 4.3.
20
Ibid., 24-25.
21
Ibid., 24-25.
15
upper portion shows the sung pitch. When aligning the two images, it is evident how the
formants amplify the harmonics to which they are tuned.22
Figure 2.9. Power spectra of A4, sung by a soprano on an [i] vowel (signal A), and vocal fry
(signal B).23
The first formant (F1) is affiliated with the back cavity, and the second formant (F2) is
affiliated with the front.24 Miller lists three general rules regarding the adjustments of these two
formants:
Lip rounding lowers all formant frequencies, but especially F2; lip
spreading has the opposite effect.
Larynx lowering lowers all formant frequencies, but especially F1; larynx
raising has the opposite effect.
22
Ibid., 23.
23
Ibid., figure 4.1.
24
Ibid., 29.
16
Moving the tongue constriction forward raises F2 and lowers F1; moving
it backward has the opposite effect.25
By adjusting the formant frequencies with the articulators, vowels are shaped. Figure
2.10 shows a vowel diagram, which displays the first and second formant frequency ranges of
eight vowels during speech. The open and closed dimension of a vowel is dependent on the first
formant, while the front and back dimension is dependent on the second formant. The variance
for each vowel accounts for different individuals, whose vocal tracts are different sizes.
Generally, children have the smallest vocal tracts, and therefore the highest formant frequencies.
Adult men typically have the largest vocal tracts, and the lowest formant frequencies. 26
Figure 2.10. First and second formant frequency ranges of eight vowels during speech. 27
25
Ibid., 31.
26
Ibid., 26-28.
27
Ibid., figure 4.4.
17
For the purpose of this treatise, I have chosen to focus on the [a] vowel. The work of Dr.
Miller shows how this vowel can be used successfully to identify register transitions in the voice
due to the close proximity of the first two formants (F1 and F2). The [a] vowel has been the
primary focus of Dr. Millers research regarding the registers of the voice. As a result, the data
collected in this treatise can be compared to his research and cross-referenced with his findings
in the female voice. For these reasons, analyzing vocalises on [a] was the most useful means of
researching the registers of the countertenor voice.
18
CHAPTER THREE
UPPER REGISTER
To date, the analysis of the upper register of the countertenor voice has remained largely
unexplored. Like female singers, countertenors also make an upper register transition. Through
the examination of the power spectrum and the EGG waveform of an E Major scale beginning on
E4 on an [a] vowel, it is possible to identify this transition.
Figure 3.1. Octave scale from E4 to E5 on [a] by Andrew Rader. EGG waveforms are shown of
C#5 (A) and D#5 (B).
Figure 3.1 shows an E major scale sung on an [a] vowel by countertenor Andrew Rader.
In signal A, the cursor is placed on C#5, and in signal B the cursor is placed on D#5. In the case
of both EGG waveform signals, a manual CQ measurement was taken by placing the orange
cursor at the beginning of the closed phase. The CQ was then calculated by dividing the Interval
(length of time the vocal folds are presumably in the closed phase) by the Period (length of the
glottal cycle) (1.28/1.84=70% and 1.22/1.63=75%). The increase of 5% in the CQ also
19
corresponds with a shift in harmonic dominance from H2 to H1, shown in the power spectrum of
Figure 3.2 and 3.3 at the same 6172 and 6528 ms marks.
D#5 (B), with cursors placed on H1.
20
D#5 (B), with cursors placed on H2.
The cursor is placed on H1 in Figure 3.2, and on H2 in Figure 3.3. In both figures, the
#
C 5 is shown in signal A, and the D#5 is shown in signal B. In examining the C#5 at the 6172 ms
mark, H2 is -9 dB, and H1 is -18 dB. This means that H2 is dominant over H1 by 9 dB. This
harmonic dominance changes on the D#5, when H1 becomes dominant over H2 by 4 dB.
Because the strength of the harmonics fluctuates with vibrato, a long time average spectrum
(LTAS) was also used.
21
E5 (B), with cursors placed on H1.
22
Figures 3.4 and 3.5 show the same E Major scale sung by Andrew Rader displayed using
an LTAS of 300 ms, with measurements taken at C#5 and E5. Using the LTAS, H2 is dominant
over H1 on C#5 by 4 dB, and H1 is dominant over H2 by 13 dB on E5. This creates a variance of
17 dB between H1 and H2 from C#5 to E5. The change from H1 to H2 dominance shows a
change in resonance strategy from F2/H2 to F1/H1, which indicates a register transition.
In this particular example, the register transition taking place is comparable to the
transition in the female voice, by which the singer tunes F2 to H2 in the middle register, and then
tunes F1 to H1 as she moves into the upper register.28 The examples primarily observed in
Resonance in Singing reference the soprano voice, in which this transition does not take place
until F5, with E5 being a transitional note in which H1 and H2 are relatively equal. 29 The
transition was observed at a lower pitch in the countertenor voice.
The majority of the participants did not maintain a dominant H2 through the middle
register like Andrew Rader. Instead, they maintained a slightly dominant H1. The upper register
transition is still visible, however, through the sudden change in amplitude between H1 and H2.
An example of this possibility is shown in Figures 3.6 and 3.7, which use an LTAS of 300 ms.
28
Ibid., 70-72.
29
Ibid., 70-71.
23
24
Figures 3.6 and 3.7 show an E Major scale sung on an [a] vowel by Dan Bubeck. On C #5,
H1 is dominant over H2 by 5 dB. While H1 remains dominant on E 5, it is dominant over H2 by
a large difference of 17 dB. In this example, there is a change in amplitude of 12 dB between H1
and H2 when comparing C#5 and E5. This change in amplitude is an indication that the transition
to the upper register has taken place.
A comparable example to Dans scale is shown in Resonance in Singing, in which a
mezzo-soprano also has a slightly dominant H1 in the middle register. Miller states that this is a
result of darkening the vowel, which lowers F1 and F2 . 30
However, the formant frequencies found in natural speech differ in male and female
voices. The formants are typically lower in the male voice and higher in the female voice. This
is the result of differences in vocal tract size . 31 It is possible that a larger vocal tract in some
countertenors may make it difficult to tune F2 to H2, resulting in a darker quality.
Like Andrew, Dan also had an increase in CQ when transitioning from C #5 to D#5, which
is shown in Figure 3.8. This is further evidence that a register transition has taken place. In
Dans case, the CQ increased from 37% (.69/1.88) on the C#5 to 51% (.80/1.58) on the D#5. This
large change can also be observed in the CQ history shown above the spectrograph, where there
is a sudden spike. Though the CQ history does not show completely accurate measurements due
to a constant CL, it can provide a worthwhile overview of an entire passage.
30
Ibid., 74.
31
Ibid., 26-27.
25
Figure 3.8. Octave scale from E4 to E5 on [a] by Dan Bubeck. EGG waveforms are shown of C#5
(A) and D#5 (B).
The increase in CQ at the transition into the upper register is a phenomenon which is not
present in the female voice. Donald Miller maintains that in the female voice, this transition is
primarily related to adjustments in resonance, rather than an adjustment at the voice source. 32 In
the countertenor voice, both adjustments appear to be paramount to the negotiation of this
register transition.
In the case of ten of the eleven participants, there was a noticeable shift toward clear F1
dominance after ascending past C#5. While the majority of the participants maintained a slightly
dominant H1 through the middle voice, there was a significant change in amplitude between H1
and H2 from C#5 to E5.
One participant, however, decreased the amplitude between H1 and H2 from C #5 to E5,
which did not align with the results from the other singers. A similar example is shown in
Resonance in Singing, when a soprano continues to maintain the F2/H2 strategy to A5. Miller
32
Ibid., 73.
26
refers to this as a register violation.33 As a result, the data from this singer has not been
included in the following calculations.
The difference in amplitude between H1 and H2 from C#5 to E5 was measured in each
singer through the use of an LTAS of 300ms. These changes in amplitude ranged from 7 to 23
dB. The average was 14.1 dB among the 10 countertenors included in this calculation. While
the majority of the participants did not maintain a complete F2/H2 resonance strategy in the
middle register, the movement toward a strong F1/H1 strategy indicates a resonance adjustment.
The evidence of a change in CQ and a shift to a dominant F1/H1 resonance strategy
provides strong evidence of an upper register transition taking place in the countertenor voice
after C#5. In the case of all the participants, the middle register to upper register transition was
complete by E5. This area of transition seems to coincide with the mezzo-soprano voice.
The majority of the participants in this study had an upper range that extended to G5 at
the top. Observations showed that the CQ remained steady following the transition into the
upper register. Figure 3.9 shows an ascending fifth from C5 to G5 sung on an [a] vowel by
Anthony Roth Costanzo. In this example, a manual measurement of the EGG waveform was
taken on E5 (signal A) and G5 (signal B). The measurement revealed a consistent CQ of 42%
(.65/1.53) and 43% (.57/1.32) respectively.
33
Ibid., 72-73.
27
Figure 3.9. Ascending 5th from C5 to G5 on [a] by Anthony Roth Costanzo. EGG waveforms are
shown of E5 (A) and G5 (B).
One participant had a rare range that extended to C6. Figure 3.10 shows an ascending
fifth from F5 to C6 sung on an [a] vowel by Todd Doering. In this example, the CQ remains at a
consistent level with a measurement of 48% on G5 (signal A) and 51% (.54/1.05) on B5 (signal
B). The consistency of the CQ in the upper limits of the countertenor voice represented in Figure
3.8 and Figure 3.9 provide further justification of a registration event taking place between C #5
and E5, when there is an observable increase in CQ.
28
Figure 3.10. Ascending 5th from F5 to C6 on [a] by Todd Doering. EGG waveforms are shown of
G5 (A) and B5 (B).
Evidence from this study suggests that most countertenors have a top note of G5. Some
rare voices extend to C6 and possibly higher. It was observed that as the participants reached the
limits of their range, they began to lose laryngeal stability. An example of this is shown in
Figure 3.11, where movement in the EGG waveform signal provides an indication of an unstable
larynx as the singer reaches the top of his range.
29
Figure 3.11. EGG waveform indicating an unstable larynx.
30
CHAPTER FOUR
MIDDLE REGISTERS
When considering the range of most countertenor repertoire, the majority of singing
takes place in the middle registers. Through the examination of the power spectrum and the
EGG waveform of a D major scale beginning on D4 on an [a] vowel, it is possible to identify the
middle register transitions in the countertenor voice.
Figures 4.1 and 4.2 show a D major scale beginning on D4 sung on an [a] vowel by
countertenor Andrew Rader. The cursor is placed on H2 in Figure 4.1, and on H3 in Figure 4.2.
In both figures, G4 is displayed in signal A, and A4 is displayed in signal B. Utilizing an LTAS
of 300ms, a harmonic shift is clearly displayed between the two pitches.
Figure 4.1 shows an increase in H2 from -16dB to -14dB as Andrew ascends from G4 to
A4. While this is a small increase, Figure 4.2 shows how H3 dramatically decreases from -24dB
to -38dB. Between the two harmonics, there is an overall change of 16 dB when moving
between the two pitches. The change in amplitude between H2 and H3 is a clear indication that
H3 has moved out of the range of the second formant.
31
A4 (B), with cursors placed on H2.
A4 (B), with cursors placed on H3.
32
In eight of the eleven the participants, the transition from the lower-middle to the uppermiddle register took place between G4 and A4. The change in amplitude between H2 and H3
from G4 to A4 was measured in each of the 8 singers through the use of an LTAS of 300 ms.
These changes ranged between 5 dB and 29 dB. The average was 15.9 dB among the 8
countertenors included in this calculation. The dramatic drop in the strength of H3 indicates a
necessary resonance adjustment in this area of the voice.
In three of the participants, however, the transition was slightly lower, and was observed
between F#4 and G4. An example is shown in Figures 4.3 and 4.4, which show a D major scale
beginning on D4 sung on an [a] vowel by countertenor Brennan Hall. The cursor is placed on H2
in Figure 4.3, and on H3 in Figure 4.4. In both figures, F#4 is displayed in signal A, and G4 is
displayed in signal B. Utilizing an LTAS of 300ms, a harmonic shift is clearly displayed
between the two pitches.
Figure 4.3 shows an increase in H2 from -27dB to -26dB as Brennan ascends from F#4 to
G4. While this is a small increase, Figure 4.2 shows how H3 decreases from -27dB to -42dB.
Between the two harmonics, there is an overall change of 15 dB when moving between the two
pitches. The change in amplitude between H2 and H3 is a clear indication that H3 has moved
out of the range of the second formant.
In the three singers who negotiated this resonance shift from F#4 to G4, the change in
amplitude between H2 and H3 was measured through the use of an LTAS of 300 ms. These
changes ranged between 12 dB and 16 dB. The average was 13.7 dB among the 3 countertenors
included in this calculation. The dramatic drop in the strength of H3 indicates a resonance
adjustment made by these three singers.
33
G4 (B), with cursors placed on H2.
G4 (B), with cursors placed on H3.
34
These examples present evidence that the countertenor makes a resonance adjustment as
he ascends from the lower middle register to the upper middle register. In the female voice a
similar register transition takes place. An example is shown in Figure 4.5, extracted from
Resonance in Singing. This example is an excerpt from Ebbenne andro lontano sung by
Maria Callas. Signal A shows a D5, with the cursor placed on H2. Signal B shows a G4, with the
cursor placed on H3. The example shows a clearly dominant H3 on the G4, and a dominant H2
on D5. Between these two pitches, the transition from the lower-middle to the upper middle
register has taken place.
Figure 4.5. Excerpt from Ebbenne andro lontano, sung by Maria Callas. Power spectra are
shown of D5 (A) with cursor placed on H2, and G4 (B) with cursor placed on H3.34
Another example from Resonance in Singing is shown in Figure 4.6. This example
compares two different recordings of Un bel di, from Madama Butterfly. Signal A displays an
Ab4 sung by Rgine Crespin, and signal B shows the same pitch sung by Yoko Watanabe.
Rgine Crespins sample shows a dominant H3, while Watanabes shows a dominant H2. The
34
Ibid., figure 11.4.
35
two different resonance strategies employed by these singers provide evidence that the transition
from the lower-middle to upper-middle register takes place in this part of the female voice.
Figure 4.6. Excerpts from Un bel di, sung by Rgine Crespin (A) and Yoko Watanabe (B).
Power spectra of Ab4 are shown, with cursors placed on H3 (A) and H2 (B). 35
While similar, the harmonic characteristics of this transition are unique in the
countertenor voice. Through the examples examined, H3 is not shown to be dominant over H2
prior to the transition to the upper middle. Instead, H3 remains slightly subdominant to H2 until
H3 drops significantly in decibel level. This may be a resonance characteristic unique to the
countertenor voice due to lower natural formant frequencies in the male vocal tract.
One example, however, shows the possibility of H3 to be dominant over H2 in the lower
middle register. Figures 4.7 and 4.8 show an A major scale beginning on A3 sung on an [a]
vowel by countertenor Andrew Rader. The cursor is placed on H2 in Figure 4.7, and on H3 in
Figure 4.8. In both figures, F#4 is displayed in signal A, and G#4 is displayed in signal B.
Utilizing an LTAS of 300 ms, a dominant H3 is clearly shown on F#4. H2 becomes dominant on
35
Ibid., figure 11.5.
36
G#4. In this instance, the singer has maintained a dominant H3 when ascending on an octave
scale beginning on A3. This did not correlate with data from any of the other participants.
and G4 (B), with cursors placed on
37
and G4 (B), with cursors placed on H3
In the majority of the participants, there was also a rise in CQ associated with the shift
from the lower middle to the upper middle register. An example is shown in Figure 4.9, which
shows a D major scale beginning on D4 sung on an [a] vowel by countertenor Andrew Rader. In
signal A, the cursor is placed on G4, and in signal B the cursor is placed on A5. In the case of
both EGG waveform signals, a manual CQ measurement was taken by placing the orange cursor
at the beginning of the closed phase. The CQ was then calculated by dividing the Interval by the
Period (1.59/2.58=62% and 1.56/2.30=68%).
38
G4 (A) and A4 (B).
A gradual rise in CQ through the upper middle register was a trend found in the majority
of participants, and typically began at the moment of resonance change or shortly after. Figure
4.10 shows the same D major scale sung by Andrew Rader. In this example the cursor is placed
on G4 in signal A, and on D5 in signal B. In the case of both EGG waveform signals, a manual
CQ measurement was taken by placing the orange cursor at the beginning of the closed phase.
The CQ was then calculated by dividing the Interval by the Period (1.57/2.60=60% and
1.25/1.74=72%). This measurement shows the gradual rise in CQ, encompassing pitches from
G4 to D5. While this trend was common among the participants, this particular countertenor had
displayed an unusually high overall CQ throughout his range. This high level of CQ was not
common among the participants.
39
G4 (A) and D4 (B).
Another example is displayed in Figure 4.11, which shows a D major scale beginning on
D4 sung on an [a] vowel by countertenor Anthony Roth Costanzo. In this example, the same rise
in CQ is shown as he ascends through the upper-middle register. In signal A, the cursor is placed
on G4, and on D5 in signal B. Over the range of these two pitches, the CQ increased from 36% to
45%.
Anthonys overall CQ levels are representative of the majority of the countertenors who
took part in this study. Generally the levels remained in the 30s in the lower-middle register and
increased into the 40s in the upper-middle register. Andrews CQ levels were significantly
higher than all of the countertenors in this study.
40
Figure 4.11. Octave scale from D4 to D5 on [a] by Anthony Roth Costanzo. EGG waveforms are
shown of G4 (A) and D4 (B).
41
CHAPTER FIVE
CHEST REGISTER
Negotiating the transition from the chest voice source to the head voice source is one of
the greatest technical challenges a singer faces. Donald Miller refers to this transition as the
primary register transition (PRT), which is also known as the primo passaggio.36 He describes
this transition in the female voice, and the difficulty in the male voice as follows:
The one place on our map of the singing voice where the chasm dividing the
natural registers confronts us directly is in the lower portion of the (classical)
female singing range. In the unschooled voice the primary register transition
(PRT) tends to occur within the same pitch range in both male and female voices,
the range where F1 of an open vowel encounters difficulty in reaching as high as
the second harmonic. The classical solution for the male voice, as we have seen,
is to maintain the chest voice source but avoid the register violation by
sacrificing F1/H2 resonance and embracing a different resonance strategy for the
relatively short upper extension.
The full pitch range of the female voice is distributed quite differently
around the primary register transition. The greater part of the total range can be
accessed with the head voice source, making that the default mode, so to speak,
and giving the chest mode, as the exception, the task of adaptation. A further
reason why womens voices generally work both sides of the PRT is that the gap
that separates the natural registers is in general less prominent in the female voice
than the male.37 Finally, the fact that the transition occurs relatively low in the
range means that lower subglottal pressure and loudness make the register
transition less obtrusive than a comparable male transition in the same F0 range.
In fact most classical women singers keep the transition intentionally low in the
range, even lower than the male passaggio point, in spite of the fact that the
marginally higher formant frequencies of the female vocal tract are more
accommodating to upward adjustment of the PRT.38
The data collected in this study revealed that the participants managed this difficult
transition in different ways. Due to these variances, it was most beneficial to study several
36
Ibid., 88.
37
D.G. Miller, J.G. vec, and H.K. Schutte, Measurement of Characteristic Leap Interval Between Chest
and Falsetto Registers, Journal of Voice 16 (2002): 8-19.
38
Miller, 88.
42
different countertenors individually, and provide a comprehensive analysis on their individual

methods of negotiating this transition.
Figure 5.1 shows an ascending A major scale beginning on A3, sung on an [a] vowel by
countertenor Steven Rickards. In signal A, the cursor is placed on D4, and in signal B the cursor
is placed on E4. In the case of both EGG waveform signals, a manual CQ measurement was
taken by placing the orange cursor at the beginning of the closed phase. The CQ was then
calculated by dividing the Interval by the Period (1.50/3.51=43% and 1.04/3.07=34%). The
change in CQ by 9% represents the moment in which Steven has transitioned from the chest
register to the lower-middle register.
Figure 5.1. Octave scale from A3 to A4 on [a] by Steven Rickards. EGG Waveforms are shown
of D4 (A) and E4 (B).
Figures 5.2 and 5.3 show a power spectrum of the same A major scale sung by Steven
Rickards displayed using an LTAS of 300 ms, with measurements taken at D 4 and E4. A
resonance adjustment can be observed between H3 and H4. Using the LTAS, H3 is dominant
over H4 on D4 by 16 dB, and H3 is dominant over H4 by 46 dB on E4. This measurement
reveals a change in amplitude of 30 dB between H3 and H4 from D4 to E4. This change in
43
amplitude indicates that F2 has moved away from H4 toward H3, creating a resonance change.
In this particular singer, the resonance change occurs at the same moment in which the CQ
declines.
and E4 (B), with cursors placed on H3.
44
In the next example, we observe a singer who manages this transition in a lower part of
his range. Figure 5.4 shows an ascending A major scale beginning on A3 sung on an [a] vowel
by countertenor Brennan Hall. In signal A, the cursor is placed on B4, and in signal B the cursor
is placed on C#4. The transition from the chest voice to the lower-middle voice is evident in the
change in CQ from 39% to 33%.
45
Figure 5.4. Octave scale from A3 to A4 on [a] by Brennan Hall. EGG Waveforms are shown of
B4 (A) and C#4 (B).
Figures 5.5 and 5.6 show a power spectrum of the same A major scale sung by Brennan
Hall displayed using an LTAS of 300 ms, with measurements taken at B4 and C#4. A slight
over H4 on B4 by 5 dB, and H3 is dominant over H4 by 8 dB on C#4. This measurement reveals
a change in amplitude of 3 dB between H3 and H4 from D4 to E4. In this instance, the singer has
maintained a consistent resonance strategy through the transition. However, it is worth noting
the decrease in decibel level of H3 and H4 as the singer moves from the chest register to the
lower-middle register.
46
C#4 (B), with cursors placed on H3.
47
Another singer provides an example of the transition, which takes place in the range
between the transitions of Steven and Brennan. Figure 5.7 shows an ascending A major scale
beginning on A3, sung on an [a] vowel by countertenor Andrew Rader. In signal A, the cursor is
placed on C#4, and in signal B the cursor is placed on D4. In the case of both EGG waveform
signals, a manual CQ measurement was taken by placing the orange cursor at the beginning of
the closed phase. The CQ was then calculated by dividing the Interval by the Period
(1.97/3.57=55% and 1.43/3.39=42%). The transition from chest voice to the lower middle voice
is shown through a change in CQ of 13%.
Figure 5.7. Octave scale from A3 to A4 on [a] by Andrew Rader. EGG Waveforms are shown of
C#4 (A) and D4 (B).
Figures 5.8 and 5.9 show a power spectrum of the same A major scale sung by Andrew
Rader displayed using an LTAS of 300 ms, with measurements taken at C#4 and D4. A slight
over H4 on C#4 by 13 dB, and H3 is dominant over H4 by 18 dB on E4. This creates a change in
amplitude of 5 dB between H3 and H4 from C#4 to D4. In this instance, the singer has
48
maintained a consistent resonance strategy through the transition, with a very small decrease in
the decibel levels of H2 and H3.
and D4 (B), with cursors placed on
49
and D4 (B), with cursors placed on
Countertenor Reginald Mobley manages a nearly imperceptible transition from the chest
register to the lower-middle register. Figures 5.10, 5.11, and 5.12 show an ascending A major
scale beginning on A3, sung on an [a] vowel. These figures display a series of EGG waveform
signals, which show a gradual decline in CQ as the singer ascends in pitch through the transition.
Figure 5.10 displays the first instance in which the CQ begins its gradual decline. The
cursor is placed on B3 in signal A, and C#4 in signal B. In the case of both EGG waveform
signals, a manual CQ measurement was taken by placing the orange cursor at the beginning of
the closed phase. The CQ was then calculated by dividing the Interval by the Period
(2.10/3.95=53% and 1.74/3.53=49%). Between these two pitches, the CQ has decreased by 4%.
50
shown of B3 (A) and C#4 (B).
In Figure 5.11, another decline in CQ is observed from C#4 (signal A) to D4 (signal B). In
the case of both EGG waveform signals, a manual CQ measurement was taken by placing the
orange cursor at the beginning of the closed phase. The CQ was then calculated by dividing the
Interval by the Period (1.74/3.53=49% and 1.50/3.31=45%). Between these two pitches, the CQ
has declined by 4%.
The final descent in CQ is shown in Figure 5.12, which displays D4 (signal A) to E4
(signal B). In the case of both EGG waveform signals, a manual CQ measurement was taken by
placing the orange cursor at the beginning of the closed phase. The CQ was then calculated by
dividing the Interval by the Period (1.50/3.31=45% and 1.25/2.89=43%). Between these two
pitches, the CQ declined by a modest 2%.
51
shown of C#4 (A) and D4 (B).
shown of D4 (A) and E4 (B).
52
This example shows how the singer was able to manage a seamless transition by
gradually decreasing his CQ through a series of pitches. The exact moment in which he switches
from chest voice to head voice is difficult to identify aurally. It is possible that he has managed
this transition by employing a mixed voice or voix mixte.
Figures 5.13 and 5.14 show a different vocalise, in which the singer was asked to switch
between the chest voice and head voice on C4. In Figure 5.13, the EGG waveform is compared
between the two productions. Signal A shows the chest voice, in which the singer produces a
CQ of 56%. Signal B shows the head voice, in which the singer produces a CQ of 33%.
Through observing the CQ history in the upper left quadrant, a drop-off and rise can be
observed as the singer repeatedly switches between chest voice and head voice. In Figure 5.14,
the two transitional areas are explored. In signal A, the cursor is placed during the downward
slope in the CQ as the singer transitions from the chest voice to the head voice. In signal B, the
cursor is placed during the upward slope in the CQ as the singer transitions from the head voice
to the chest voice. The CQ is measured at 41% and 42% in these two transitional areas, which is
nearly in the center of the two measurements shown in Figure 5.13 at 56% and 33%. This
gradual change in CQ allows the singer to transition smoothly between the two productions.
Figure 5.13. EGG waveform of a C4 sung by Reginald Mobley. Chest voice is shown in signal
A, head voice is shown in signal B.
53
Figure 5.14. EGG waveform of a C4 sung by Reginald Mobley. Transition from chest voice to
head voice is shown in signal A, head voice to chest voice is shown in signal B.
Figures 5.15-5.20 show a power spectrum of the same A major scale sung by Reginald
Mobley, displayed using an LTAS of 300 ms. These figures show the resonance strategy used in
his transition from the chest register to the lower middle register from pitches B 3 through E4.
Figures 5.15 and 5.16 show a power spectrum of B3 (signal A) and C#4 (signal B). These
are the first two pitches in which the singer begins to decrease his CQ as he transitions. A
resonance adjustment can be observed between H3 and H4 when comparing these two pitches.
Using the LTAS, H3 is dominant over H4 on B3 by 17 dB, and H3 is equal to H4 at -28 dB on
C#4. It is evident that the singer has adjusted F2 toward H4 as he moves to the C#4, creating a
balance between H3 and H4.
54
and C#4 (B), with cursors placed on
and C#4 (B), with cursors placed on
55
The balance between H3 and H4 is maintained as the singer moves from C #4 (signal A) to
D4 (signal B), shown in Figures 5.17 and 5.18. On C#4, H3 and H4 are equal at -26 dB. On D4,
these harmonics remain stable at -24 dB and -28 dB respectively.
(A) and D4 (B), with cursors placed on H3.
56
(A) and D4 (B), with cursors placed on H4.
In Figures 5.19 and 5.20, the singer makes a resonance adjustment between D 4 (signal A)
and E4 (signal B). On D4, H3 is dominant over H4 by 4 dB. On E4, H3 is dominant over H4 by
22 dB. The distance between H3 and H4 has increased in amplitude by 18 dB between D4 and
E4. This indicates that H4 has moved out of the range of the second formant. Though aurally
imperceptible, it is possible the singer has made a full transition to head voice when he reaches
E4.
57
58
A comparison with the female voice reveals some similar characteristics with respect to
the chest voice to head voice transition observed in the above examples. Figure 5.21 shows an
example of an Ab major scale beginning on Ab3 sung on [a] by a mezzo-soprano. In signal A, the
cursor is placed on C4, and in signal B, the cursor is placed on Db4. In this example, the CQ
changes from 40% to 25% as the female singer makes a transition from the chest voice to the
head voice.
Figure 5.21. Octave scale from Ab3 to Ab4 on [a] by mezzo-soprano. EGG waveforms are shown
of C4 (A) and Db4 (B).39
The power spectrum of the same Ab scale sung by the mezzo-soprano is shown in Figure
5.22. In signal A, the cursor is placed on C4, and in signal B, the cursor is placed on Db4. In this
example we see a different resonance strategy from the countertenor examples observed above.
On C4, F2 is tuned to H5. On Db4, F2 moves to H4. None of the countertenors demonstrated a
dominant H5. This is possibly the result of lower formant frequencies in the male vocal tract.
39
Ibid., figure 11.2.
59
Figure 5.22. Power spectra of C4 (A) and Db4 (B) from Ab scale on [a] by mezzo-soprano.40
The last example is from countertenor Dan Bubeck, who begins an A major scale starting
on A3 on an [a] vowel. In this example, the singer avoids the chest voice, and begins the vocalise
in head voice from the start. In this instance, he creates a convincing sound with this method. In
Figure 5.23, the cursor is placed on B3 in signal A, and A3 in signal B. In the case of both EGG
waveform signals, a manual CQ measurement was taken by using the orange cursors. The CQ is
27% on the A3 and 30% on the B3. The lower CQ on A3 is evidence that the singer began this
vocalise without implementing chest voice.
40
Ibid., figure 11.3.
60
Figure 5.23. Octave scale from A3 to A4 on [a] by Dan Bubeck. EGG waveforms are shown of
B3 (A) and A3 (B).
A resonance adjustment can be observed low in the scale, however. Figures 5.24 and
5.25 show a power spectrum of B3 (signal A) and C#4 (signal B). On B3, H3 is dominant over H4
by 5 dB. On C#4, H3 is dominant over H4 by 16 dB. This is an overall change in amplitude of
11 dB. In this instance, the singer has made a resonance adjustment without making an
adjustment at the vocal folds.
61
62
CHAPTER SIX
CONCLUSIONS
An analysis of the data collected revealed a number of registration commonalities among
the participants. What follows is a general overview of the registers of the countertenor voice
based on signals recorded and analyzed in VoceVista.
Upper Register
The transition from the upper-middle register to the upper register was characterized by
an increase in closed quotient (CQ), and a resonance change. The power spectrum showed a
characteristic shift in the relative amplitudes of H1 and H2, with H1 gaining in dominance. In all
of the participants, this change took place in the range between C #5 and E5. This was the
uppermost register transition identified.
In regard to upper range, the majority of the participants had a top note of G5. Two of the
participants had a top note of E5. One participant exhibited a rare upper range, which extended
to C6.
Middle Registers
The transition from the lower-middle to the upper-middle register was characterized by
an increase in closed quotient (CQ), and a resonance change. The power spectrum showed a
characteristic shift in the relative amplitudes of H2 and H3, with H2 gaining in dominance. In
every participant, this change took place in the range between F#4 and A4.
A unique characteristic of the upper-middle register was the continuous rise in CQ that
took place with each rising pitch. This pattern continued until the singers transitioned to the
upper register.
Chest Register
The transition from the chest register to the lower-middle register was the most diverse
among the participants. This transition was primarily characterized by a decrease in closed
quotient (CQ). The area of transition ranged from B3 to E4. It was observed that an audibly
63
smooth transition seemed to correspond with a gradual and slight adjustment in CQ, rather than a
drastic change.
Some of the participants adjusted their resonance strategy during this transition. The
power spectrum showed a characteristic shift in the relative amplitudes of H3 and H4, with H3
gaining in dominance. Others maintained a consistent resonance strategy through the transition,
delaying the resonance adjustment to a higher part of their range. One of the participants did not
utilize his chest register in the vocalises used.
Registration Model
A registration model for the countertenor voice based on the research is shown in Figure
6.1. This model represents the register adjustments made by the countertenors who participated
in this study, which examined 11 countertenors ranging in age from 23 to 55 years of age. In
these findings, it can be concluded that the registers are similar between the countertenor and
mezzo-soprano voices. These observations should be helpful to the voice teacher in the studio,
and to both the teacher and student in their journey to find appropriate literature for the voice.
C#5
Upper
C6
Upper
Middle
G4
D5
Lower
A3
G3
Chest
Middle
G#4
D4
(and lower)
Figure 6.1. Registration model for the countertenor voice. Overlapping indicates different
singers and their adjustments.
64
GLOSSARY
The following terms have been quoted and adapted from Donald Millers Resonance in
Singing.41
amplitude. A quantitative measure of the strength of a signal, as in the decibel amount of a
sound, or of one of its frequency components.
articulators. The movable parts of the vocal tract tongue, lips, jaw, velum, etc. which
determine the (adjustable) formant frequencies, as well as breath stream dynamics, are
collectively called articulators.
back vowel. Back vowels are those with relatively low second formants and a tendency to lip
rounding, principally the series (from close to open) [u], [U], [o], [], [a].
closed vowel. Close (closed) vowels are those with low F1s, such as [i], [u], and [y].
bandwidth. A formant or resonance responds to a limited range (band) of frequencies. The
wider the bandwidth that it responds to, the more rapidly the sound will damp or decay. As a
resonator, the vocal tract has a narrower bandwidth, and thus a higher quality, when the glottis is
closed, explaining one of the advantages of a large closed quotient.
decibel. Decibel is a unit used for measuring relative sound pressure level (SPL), or physical
intensity. Most decibel measurements state the difference in intensity between two sounds (or
between frequency components of the same sound, as is the case with the power spectrum).
(Relative) decibel measurements are given as negative quantities in a display where the reference
amount is the top of the display (zero decibels). Absolute decibel measurements are in relation
to a designated minimum amount, typically set at the threshold of perception. Decibel units are
logarithmic, like the frequencies of the piano keyboard, where every octave is a doubling.
electroglottograph (EGG). The EGG is a non-invasive device for measuring relative contact
between the vocal folds. In singing voice investigations it can reveal not only the frequency of
the glottal cycle, but usually the closed quotient as well.
formant. A formant is a variable resonance of the vocal tract. The first (lowest in frequency)
five formants make important contributions to a sung sound. The frequencies of the first two
(designated F1 and F2, called the vowel formants) determine the vowel, and are also principal
varying factors in formant tuning.
frequency. Frequency is the repetition rate of a periodic signal, expressed in hertz (Hz), or
cycles per second. The fundamental frequency (F0) determines what is perceived as pitch, the
41
Ibid., 110-124.
65
psychoacoustic counterpart of F0. Frequency is the reciprocal of period, the time duration of one
cycle.
frequency component. Natural sounds, although heard as single tones, are made up of
components of varying amplitudes at various frequencies, which collectively constitute the sound
quality. The frequency components of harmonic sounds are whole-number multiples of the
fundamental.
front vowel. Front vowels are those characterized by a fronted tongue, causing a relatively high
second formant. They include the series (from close to open) [i], [I], [e], [], [], as well as the
mixed vowels (fronted tongue and rounded lips): [y], [Y], [], [].
glottal cycle. The glottal cycle consisted of single iteration of the repeated opening and closing
of the glottis.
glottis. The glottis is the opening between the vocal folds.
harmonic. A harmonic is one of the frequency components of a periodic sound, which include
H1, the fundamental frequency (note that F0 = H1), and whole-number multiples of H1: H2, H3,
H4, etc. Harmonic sound is periodic, as distinguished from non-periodic noise.
harmonic series. A harmonic series for a given F0 is generated by successively adding F0 to the
previous member: F0, 2F0, 3F0, 4F0, etc. The musical interval between members of the series
decreases with each higher step:
H1-H2: octave
H2-H3: perfect fifth
H3-H4: perfect fourth
H4-H5: major third
H5-H6: minor third, etc.
hertz (Hz). Cycles per second, a unit of frequency.
International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA). The IPA is a set of symbols for the sounds of speech
that transcends the use of the alphabet in any particular language. IPA symbols in this treatise
are always given in square brackets, e.g., [i].
long time average spectrum (LTAS). LTAS accumulates spectral measurements over specified
duration, displaying them lumped together in a single power spectrum.
non-invasive. A procedure is considered non-invasive when it does not hinder normal use of a
function. For the singing voice, the EGG is non-invasive, while laryngoscopy with a rigid
endoscope, requiring a certain tongue position, is invasive.
normalized. A signal is said to be normalized when one of its dimensions usually amplitude
is automatically adjusted to conform to a desired norm. In VoceVista the audio and the EGG
66
signals are normalized in order to fill the waveform display and thus cannot be relied upon for
information concerning absolute amplitude of the signal.
open phase. The open phase of the glottal cycle is that portion where the vocal folds have come
apart, permitting air to flow through the glottis.
open vowel. Vowels with high first formants, such as [a] and [], are considered phonetically
open.
overtone. Overtones are harmonic frequency components of a complex sound (such as voice),
all whole-number multiples of the fundamental frequency (F0). Confusion in the numbering can
arise because the first overtone is the second harmonic (H2). In overtone singing, F0 is
suppressed and individual harmonics are emphasized, usually by means of second formant
tuning, so that one hears the higher harmonic as a separate pitch.
power spectrum. see spectrum
primary register transition (PRT). The PRT is the (movable) point in the F0 range of a voice
where the vibration pattern of the glottal voice source shifts from chest to head.
register. Register is a term used to designate a perceived segment of the total frequency and
intensity range of a voice, which differs in sound or mechanical principle from other segments.
Singing voice practitioners recognize registers based on both vibration patterns of the voice
source and on shifts in resonance. Classical singing training typically aims to smooth the abrupt
transitions between the natural registers, the chest and head vibration patterns in their
isolated (unblended) state.
registration event. A registration event is a move from one register to another. The yodel is an
intentionally obvious example, but singers can also disguise registration events for the sake of
constructing the even scale.
resonance strategy. As pitch rises and the distance between harmonics increases, classical
singers seek to find formant patterns that make optimal use of the available harmonics at a given
fundamental frequency (F0). these patterns, whether conscious or not, are designated resonance
strategies in this book, which encourages adopting conscious strategies informed by spectral
feedback.
source spectrum. The source spectrum is a theoretical construction of the sound that emerges
from the glottis, without the filtering effect of the vocal tract. It is presumed to have a spectral
slope of -6 to -12 dB per octave.
spectrum, power spectrum, spectrogram. The (narrow-band) spectrum of a sound displays the
relative strength of each of its frequency components. A power spectrum has two dimensions:
frequency (in hertz) and amplitude (in decibels). The spectrogram adds a third dimension of
time, with intensity then shown in color or shades of gray.
67
standing wave. In the audio signal one speaks of a standing wave when a prominent harmonic
frequency component continues its periodic path through the open phase with relatively little loss
of energy and is timed well for reinforcement from the next glottal closing. The spectrum of
such a sound is usually characterized by a dominant harmonic at the frequency of the standing
wave.
vibrato. In singing, vibrato is a relatively small, quasi periodic modulation of the fundamental
frequency (F0), usually at rates between 4.5 and 7 hertz.
vocal fry. Vocal fry is the popping sound of air bubbling slowly through an otherwise closed
glottis so that individual ticks, at a rate of about 15 to 50 Hz, can be heard. The non-periodic
succession of ticks produces a continuous spectrum, revealing especially the frequencies of the
first two formants of the vocal tract.
vocal tract. The vocal tract is the complex air space between the glottis at one end and the
opening of the lips (and/or nostrils) at the other. All the resonances that shape the glottal airflow
(the voice source) and the audible radiated sound are properties of this space and the walls that
contain it.
VoceVista. VoceVista is a feedback and analysis system for the singing voice, processing
signals of the (non-invasive) microphone and electroglottograph (see www.vocevista.com).
voice source. The voice source is the volume velocity waveform (plotting volume displacement
of air against time) that passes through the vibrating vocal folds, typically as a series of discrete
puffs of air. Voice source is also used to refer to the vibrating vocal folds, which are relatively
independent of the vocal tract.
voix mixte. Voix mixte is a term that is often used by singers to indicate a register that is not
clearly chest or head/falsetto, but something in between. It has a long history, having been in
common use by pedagogues in the Parisian school going back to the first half of the 19th century.
vowel formants. The lowest two formants/resonances of the vocal tract, F1 and F2, are
responsible for forming the vowel. At the same time they are the resonances that are
employed in formant tuning.
vowel modification. Vowel modification is a concept from voice pedagogy predating the notion
of formant tuning, but dealing essentially with the same process, that is, adjusting the vowel
(formants) to accommodate changes in F0.
vowel space. The vowel space is a term we use to refer to a two-dimensional plot of F1 vs. F2, in
which the various regions, identified by their F1-F2 combinations, represent the several vowels
and their shadings.
waveform. A waveform, displayed as amplitude vs. time, is the shape of a single cycle of a
repeated signal. Of particular interest here are waveforms of sound pressure (microphone) and
vocal fold contact (EGG).
68
APPENDIX A
HUMAN SUBJECTS COMMITTEE APPROVAL LETTER
Office of the Vice President For Research

Human Subjects Committee
Tallahassee, Florida 32306-2742
(850) 644-8673 FAX (850) 644-4392
APPROVAL MEMORANDUM
Date: 5/14/2010
To: Raymond Chenez
Address:
Dept.: MUSIC SCHOOL
From: Thomas L. Jacobson, Chair
Re: Use of Human Subjects in Research
Vocal Registers in the Countertenor Voice
The application that you submitted to this office in regard to the use of human subjects in the
research proposal referenced above has been reviewed by the Human Subjects Committee at its
meeting on 05/12/2010. Your project was approved by the Committee.
The Human Subjects Committee has not evaluated your proposal for scientific merit, except to
weigh the risk to the human participants and the aspects of the proposal related to potential risk
and benefit. This approval does not replace any departmental or other approvals, which may be
required.
If you submitted a proposed consent form with your application, the approved stamped consent
form is attached to this approval notice. Only the stamped version of the consent form may be
used in recruiting research subjects.
If the project has not been completed by 5/11/2011 you must request a renewal of approval for
continuation of the project. As a courtesy, a renewal notice will be sent to you prior to your
expiration date; however, it is your responsibility as the Principal Investigator to timely request
renewal of your approval from the Committee.
You are advised that any change in protocol for this project must be reviewed and approved by
69
the Committee prior to implementation of the proposed change in the protocol. A protocol
change/amendment form is required to be submitted for approval by the Committee. In addition,
federal regulations require that the Principal Investigator promptly report, in writing any
unanticipated problems or adverse events involving risks to research subjects or others.
By copy of this memorandum, the Chair of your department and/or your major professor is
reminded that he/she is responsible for being informed concerning research projects involving
human subjects in the department, and should review protocols as often as needed to insure that
the project is being conducted in compliance with our institution and with DHHS regulations.
This institution has an Assurance on file with the Office for Human Research Protection. The
Assurance Number is IRB00000446.
Cc: Wanda Brister-Rachwal, Advisor
HSC No. 2010.4412
70
APPENDIX B
INFORMED CONSENT LETTER
FSU Consent Form

Vocal Registers of the Countertenor Voice
You are invited to be in a research study regarding the vocal registers of the countertenor voice.
You were selected as a possible participant because of your vocal abilities and credentials. We
ask that you read this form and ask any questions you may have before agreeing to be in the
study.
This study is being conducted by Raymond Chenez, College of Music, Florida State University.
Background Information:
The purpose of this study is to discover more about the vocal registers of the countertenor voice.
Through spectrographic and electroglottographic analysis, the areas of the voice in which
registration events occur will be determined. The final treatise will serve as a reference for
teachers and countertenors.
Procedures:
If you agree to be in this study, we would ask you to do the following things:
Sing a series of vocalises into a microphone with an electroglottograph fastened around the
outside of the neck. The (EGG) will be fastened snugly, but will not restrict the airway. It is a
non-invasive signal, in which a minute high-frequency current runs between electrodes that are
held in place on either side of the larynx. The vocalises you will be asked to sing are consistent
with everyday professional singing activity. Audio recordings and (EGG) readings will be
retained. The duration of the recording process will be approximately an hour.
Risks and benefits of being in the Study:
The risks are consistent with those encountered in everyday singing.
The benefit to participation is the contribution to the technical knowledge of the countertenor
voice.
Compensation:
You will not receive compensation.
71
Confidentiality:
The data from this study will be printed in the final treatise. Audio recordings, as well as visual
representations of the data collected will appear in the document. With your permission, your
name may also appear in connection with the audio recordings and data. Any additional
information will be kept private and confidential to the extent permitted by law.
Voluntary Nature of the Study:
Participation in this study is voluntary. Your decision whether or not to participate will not
affect your current or future relations with the University. If you decide to participate, you are
free to withdraw at any time without affecting those relationships.
Contacts and Questions:
The researcher conducting this study is Raymond Chenez. You may ask any question you have
now. If you have a question later, you are encouraged to contact him at (XXX) XXX-XXXX.
The faculty advisor for this study is Wanda Brister-Rachwal, (850) 644-5073,
wbristerrachwal@fsu.edu.
If you have any questions or concerns regarding this study and would like to talk to someone
other than the researcher(s), you are encouraged to contact the FSU IRB at 2010 Levy Street,
Research Building B, Suite 276, Tallahassee, FL 32306-2742, or 850-644-8633, or by email at
humansubjects@magnet.fsu.edu.
You will be given a copy of this information to keep for your records.
Statement of Consent:
I have read the above information. I have asked questions and have received answers. I consent
to participate in the study.
I agree to the use of my name in association with the research conducted.
Yes______ No______
________________
Signature
_________________
Date
________________
Signature of Investigator
_________________
Date
72
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Ardran, G.M. and David Wulstan. The Alto or Countertenor Voice. Music & Letters
48, no. 1 (January 1967): 17-22.
Baldwin, Olive and Thelma Wilson. Alfred Deller, John Freeman and Mr. Pate. Music
& Letters 50, no. 1 (January 1969): 103-10.
Dearnley, Christopher. English Church Music 1650-1750. London: Oxford University
Press, 1970.
Garcia II, Manuel. A Complete Treatise on the Art of Singing: Part One. New York: Da Capo
Press, 1984.
Giles, Peter. A Basic Countertenor Method. London: Kahn & Averill, 2005.
. The History and Technique of the Counter-Tenor. Cambridge: University Press,
1994.
Hodgson, Frederic. The Contemporary Alto. Musical Times 106, no. 1466 (April
1965): 293-94.
Hough, John. The Historical Significance of the Counter-Tenor. Proceedings of the
Musical Association 64th Sess. (November 1937): 1-24.
Miller, Donald. Resonance in Singing: Voice Building through Acoustic Feedback. Princeton,
NJ: Inside View Press, 2008.
Miller, Richard. The Structure of Singing: System and Art in Vocal Technique.
Belmont, CA: Schirmer, 1996.
Stubbs, G. Edward. The Adult Male Alto or Counter-tenor Voice. New York: The H. W.
Gray Co., 1908.
Sundberg, Johan. The Science of the Singing Voice. DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press,
1987.
Vennard, William. Singing: The Mechanism and the Technic. New York: C. Fisher, 1967.
Ware, Clifton. Basics of Vocal Pedagogy: The Foundations and Process of Singing. McGrawHill, 1998.
Welch, G.F., D.C. Sergeant, and F. MacCurtain. Some Physical Characteristics of the
Male Falsetto Voice. Journal of Voice 2, no. 2 (1988): 151-63.
73
Xeroradiographic-Electrolaryngographic Analysis of Male Vocal Registers. Journal of

Voice 3, no. 3 (September 1989): 244-56.
Woodfill, Walter L. Musicians in English Society. Princeton: Princeton University Press,
1953.
Wright, F.B. The Alto and Countertenor Voices. The Musical Times 100, no. 1401
(November 1959): 593-94.
Zaslaw, Neal. The Enigma of the Haute-Contre. The Musical Times 115, no. 1581
(November 1974): 939-41.
74
BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH
Education
2008-2011
Florida State University, College of Music, Tallahassee

Doctor of Music in Vocal Performance
Treatise: Vocal Registers in the Countertenor Voice: Based on Signals Recorded
and Analyzed in VoceVista
Major Professor: Wanda Brister
2006-2008
Florida State University, College of Music, Tallahassee

Master of Arts in Arts Administration
Major Professor: Anne Hodges
2002-2006
State University of New York at Fredonia

Bachelor of Music in Vocal Performance
Major Professor: Delia Wallis
Academic Honors and Awards

2010
Dissertation Research Grant, Department of Graduate Studies
2008-2011
Graduate Assistantship, Florida State University

Tuition waiver and stipend
2008
Pi Kappa Lambda Music Honor Society, Florida State University
2006-2008
Graduate Assistantship, Florida State University

Tuition waiver and stipend
Artistic Honors and Awards

2011
MONC Florida District, Encouragement Award
2010
Birmingham (Alabama) Opera Competition (National), 4 th place

Bethlehem (Pennsylvania) Bach Competition (National), Finalist
2009
Louisville (Kentucky) Bach Society Competition (National), Honorable Mention
2008
Suncoast Opera Guild Competition (St Petersburg, FL) (State), 3 rd place

Orpheus Vocal Competition (Murfreesboro, TN) (National), 3rd place
2007
Southeast Regional NATS Auditions, Tallahassee, FL, 2nd place
2006
Vincent Morette Music Award, SUNY Fredonia
2005
David Evans Vocal Performance Award, SUNY Fredonia

75
Performances
Opera Roles
Britten
Handel
Purcell
Anon.
Opera Scenes
Handel
Monteverdi
Sondheim
A Midsummer Nights Dream

Serse
Dioclesian
The Play of Herod
Oberon
Arsamene
Countertenor
Shepherd
Ariodante
Giulio Cesare
LIncoronazione di Poppea
A Little Night Music
Ariodante
Giulio Cesare
Nerone
Mrs. Segstrom (Mr.)
Concert Repertoire:
Bach
Cantata 62
Cantata 133
Cantata 153
Bernstein
Chichester Psalms
Missa Brevis
Handel
Cantata 132c
Judas Maccabaeus
Messiah
Saul
Monteverdi
Vespers of 1610
Israelitish Man
David
Professional Organizations:
Amherst Early Music Festival
Florida State Opera
Master Chorale of Tampa Bay
Opera Sacra, Buffalo, NY
St. Johns Episcopal Church, Tallahassee
St. Pauls Cathedral, Buffalo, NY

Seraphic Fire, Miami, FL
SUNY Fredonia College Choir (Guest Artist)
Tallahassee Community Chorus
Conductors:
Directors:
Andrew Cantrill
Matthew Lata
Douglas Fisher
Drew Minter
Gerald Gray
Patrick Dupr Quigly
Anthony Rooley
Jonathan Scarozza
Andr Thomas
Richard Zielinski
Coaches/Master Classes:
Julianne Baird
David Daniels
Douglas Fisher
Timothy Hoekman
Graham Johnson
Jan Kobow
Stephan MacLeod
Kenneth Merrill
76
Voice Teachers:
Wanda Brister
Michael Dean
Roy Delp
Delia Wallis

Countertenor Voice

Încărcat de

Informații document

Drepturi de autor

Formate disponibile

Partajați acest document

Partajați sau inserați document

Opțiuni de partajare

Vi se pare util acest document?

Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

Countertenor Voice

Încărcat de

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY

VOCAL REGISTERS OF THE COUNTERTENOR VOICE:

A treatise submitted to the

UMI Number: 3477195

All rights reserved

Figure 1.1 Manuel Garcia IIs table of registers.3

Figure 1.2 Peter Giles system of registration.4

VoceVista-Pro is voice analysis software designed and developed by Donald Miller.

Figure 2.3. Spectrogram extracted from Figure 2.2.

respectively. It is best understood as a very narrow time-slice through a spectrogram.10 The

Figure 2.4. Power spectrum extracted from Figure 2.2.

Figure 2.6. Electroglottograph waveform (EGG) extracted from Figure 2.5.

Figure 2.7. Audio waveform extracted from Figure 2.5.

Ibid., figure 4.3.

Ibid., figure 4.1.

Ibid., figure 4.4.

Figure 3.11. EGG waveform indicating an unstable larynx.

Ibid., figure 11.4.

Ibid., figure 11.5.

different countertenors individually, and provide a comprehensive analysis on their individual

Ibid., figure 11.2.

Ibid., figure 11.3.

Office of the Vice President For Research

FSU Consent Form

Xeroradiographic-Electrolaryngographic Analysis of Male Vocal Registers. Journal of

Florida State University, College of Music, Tallahassee

Florida State University, College of Music, Tallahassee

State University of New York at Fredonia

Academic Honors and Awards

Graduate Assistantship, Florida State University

Pi Kappa Lambda Music Honor Society, Florida State University

Graduate Assistantship, Florida State University

Artistic Honors and Awards

Birmingham (Alabama) Opera Competition (National), 4 th place

Louisville (Kentucky) Bach Society Competition (National), Honorable Mention

Suncoast Opera Guild Competition (St Petersburg, FL) (State), 3 rd place

Southeast Regional NATS Auditions, Tallahassee, FL, 2nd place

Vincent Morette Music Award, SUNY Fredonia

David Evans Vocal Performance Award, SUNY Fredonia

A Midsummer Nights Dream

St. Pauls Cathedral, Buffalo, NY

S-ar putea să vă placă și