Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Meat Science
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/meatsci
Review
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 20 January 2012
Received in revised form 2 April 2012
Accepted 3 April 2012
Keywords:
Cell culture
Tissue engineering
Meat substitutes
a b s t r a c t
As one of the alternatives for livestock meat production, in vitro culturing of meat is currently studied. The
generation of bio-articial muscles from satellite cells has been ongoing for about 15 years, but has never
been used for generation of meat, while it already is a great source of animal protein.
In order to serve as a credible alternative to livestock meat, lab or factory grown meat should be efciently
produced and should mimic meat in all of its physical sensations, such as visual appearance, smell, texture
and of course, taste. This is a formidable challenge even though all the technologies to create skeletal muscle
and fat tissue have been developed and tested. The efcient culture of meat will primarily depend on culture
conditions such as the source of medium and its composition. Protein synthesis by cultured skeletal muscle
cells should further be maximized by nding the optimal combination of biochemical and physical conditions
for the cells. Many of these variables are known, but their interactions are numerous and need to be mapped.
This involves a systematic, if not systems, approach. Given the urgency of the problems that the meat industry is facing, this endeavor is worth undertaking. As an additional benet, culturing meat may provide opportunities for production of novel and healthier products.
2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Contents
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Why do we need meat alternatives? . . . . . . .
Requirements for a meat alternative . . . . . . .
Meat alternatives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cultured meat . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5.1.
Stem cells . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5.2.
Cell culture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5.3.
Tissue engineering . . . . . . . . . . . .
6.
What after in vitro meat can be grown effectively? .
Acknowledgment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
1. Introduction
In recent years the notion has been growing that alternatives may
be needed for conventional meat production through livestock. This is
generally based on concerns about sustainability, environmental burden and animal welfare. These concerns have grown due to further
intensication of livestock herding and slaughtering, and on the
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
297
297
298
298
299
299
299
300
300
300
300
298
299
300
doublings give a thousand-fold higher yield. With the current isolation and culturing methods for satellite cells 20 doublings can be
achieved. Higher doubling numbers have generally been obtained
by delaying differentiation, therefore much attention has focused on
the mechanisms that determine differentiation. A major improvement in maintaining the replicative capacity of satellite cells indeed
resulted from a combination of mild enzymatic treatment and trituration of remaining skeletal muscle brils during harvesting according
to Collins et al. (2005). Once harvested, the concept is to recreate
the stem cell niche as closely as possible to retain the stem cell behavior of the satellite cells (Boonen & Post, 2008). For instance, success
has been achieved with changing the elasticity of the substrate on
which the satellite cells are cultured (Gilbert et al., 2010). In our
hands however, the effect of physiologic substrate stiffness on myoblast cell proliferation was mild, higher than on very accid substrates (3 kPa range) but not signicantly different from stiff plastic
surfaces (Boonen, Rosaria-Chak, Baaijens, van der Schaft, & Post,
2009). Likewise, coating the culture surface with proteins that
mimic the basal membrane, such as laminin and collagen IV, has
some impact on the proliferation rate of satellite cells (Wilschut,
Haagsman, & Roelen, 2010). Finally, a large variety of biochemical
mechanisms stimulate differentiation, such as TGF1, Pax7, Notch
and Wnt (Zammit, 2008). For most of these mechanisms, biological
modulators have been designed and may be used to optimize proliferation by delaying differentiation.
After having produced sufcient cells, the next goal is to differentiate them into skeletal muscle cells and coerce them into maximum
protein production i.e. to undergo hypertrophy. For satellite cells, this
process occurs almost naturally with very little adjustment to culture
conditions. The cells will merge, form myotubes, and will start to express early stage skeletal muscle markers such as MyoD, myogenin
and embryonic isoforms of muscle myosin heavy chain. The cues for
subsequent hypertrophy are a mix of metabolic, biochemical and mechanical stimuli. It appears that mechanical stimuli are extremely important in triggering protein synthesis and protein organization into
contractile units. The latter gives the muscle its typical striated microscopic morphology. Usually, these cells are cast in a collagen-like gel
or onto a temporary biodegradable scaffold. In both conditions the
cell constructs or bio-articial muscles (BAMs) are anchored (e.g. Velcro or silk wires) to the culture dish to simulate tendons. Differentiation therefore takes places in a tissue engineering construct.
5.3. Tissue engineering
Most mesenchymal cells, including skeletal muscle cells, will organize a collagen or collagen/Matrigel gel in a tight ber in between the
anchors and will develop tension within that ber (Grinnell, 2000).
This apparently static tension boosts protein production by the socalled bio-articial muscle tremendously (Vandenburgh et al.,
1999). Interestingly, imposition of cyclic stretch did not further improve protein synthesis but had in fact a slight negative effect
(Boonen et al., 2010; Kook et al., 2008). This result is somewhat controversial as others have observed positive effects of cyclic stretch on
muscle maturation (Powell, Smiley, Mills, & Vandenburgh, 2002). In
addition to passive stretch and tension, we and others have investigated the effect of electrical stimulation to further stimulate protein
production and force generation (Boonen, van der Schaft, Baaijens,
& Post, 2011). In combination with specic coatings, electrical stimulation did lead to earlier maturation of the skeletal muscle bers, but
it remains to be shown if for large scale production the rather inefcient use of energy warrants the improvement in protein synthesis.
For a more extensive discussion on mechanical stimulation of muscle
differentiation please see (Langelaan et al., 2010).
With the above described techniques it is feasible to generate
BAMs of small dimensions, limited by the dependence on an adequate
nutrient and oxygen supply through diffusion. No attempts have been
made yet to create large BAMs with a built-in blood vessel or channel
system conducting a continuous ow of oxygenized, nutrient-rich
medium. However, printing and biomaterial technologies have been
described that would make this possible and certainly testable
(Skardal, Zhang, & Prestwich, 2010; Visconti et al., 2010).
Although contractile proteins comprise the bulk of protein content
and quality of muscle tissue, there are other proteins that are important
for texture, color and taste of the BAM tissue. One particularly important
protein is myoglobin. As a heme-carrying protein it is in part responsible for the pink color of meat and since it is a major carrier of iron, its
presence will likely determine taste as well. The transcriptional regulation of myoglobin is reasonably well understood and involves the
transcriptional activators MEF2 and NFAT/calcineurin (Kanatous &
Mammen, 2010) and co-activator PGC-1. It appears that contractile
activation of muscle in the setting of hypoxia will stimulate myoglobin
maximally. It seems therefore feasible to increase the myoglobin
content using stimuli that are compatible with tissue engineering of
products that eventually should be consumed.
In summary, the effective culture of skeletal muscle is possible
with current technology. There are numerous options for renement
and extension suggesting that it will take time and effort to optimize
the product, but current successes indicate that an acceptable mimic
of meat tissue will likely be generated.
Acknowledgment
I would like to thank Jason Matheny at New-harvest.org for critically reviewing the manuscript and Prof Stefaan De Smet for his
input on speciers of meat taste.
References
Boonen, K. J., Langelaan, M. L., Polak, R. B., van der Schaft, D. W., Baaijens, F. P., & Post, M. J.
(2010). Effects of a combined mechanical stimulation protocol: Value for skeletal
muscle tissue engineering. Journal of Biomechanics, 43(8), 15141521.
Boonen, K. J., & Post, M. J. (2008). The muscle stem cell niche: Regulation of satellite
cells during regeneration. Tissue Engineering. Part B, Reviews, 14(4), 419431.
Boonen, K. J., Rosaria-Chak, K. Y., Baaijens, F. P., van der Schaft, D. W., & Post, M. J. (2009).
Essential environmental cues from the satellite cell niche: Optimizing proliferation and
differentiation. American Journal of Physiology. Cell Physiology, 296(6), C13381345.
Boonen, K. J., van der Schaft, D. W., Baaijens, F. P., & Post, M. J. (2011). Interaction between
electrical stimulation, protein coating and matrix elasticity: A complex effect on muscle bre maturation. Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, 5(1),
6068.
Bredahl, L., Grunert, K. G., & Fertin, C. (1998). Relating consumer perceptions of pork
quality to physical product characteristics. Food Quality and Preference, 9, 8.
Brul, S., Mensonides, F. I., Hellingwerf, K. J., & Teixeira de Mattos, M. J. (2008). Microbial
systems biology: New frontiers open to predictive microbiology. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 128(1), 1621.
Capper, J. L. (2011). The environmental impact of beef production in the United States:
1977 compared with 2007. Journal of Animal Science, 89(12), 42494261.
CDC (2012). CDC estimates of foodborne illness in the United States. http://www.cdc.
gov/foodborneburden/2011-foodborne-estimates.html Accessed: Jan 20th, 2012
301
Mizuno, Y., Chang, H., Umeda, K., Niwa, A., Iwasa, T., Awaya, T., Fukada, S., Yamamoto,
H., Yamanaka, S., Nakahata, T., & Heike, T. (2010). Generation of skeletal muscle
stem/progenitor cells from murine induced pluripotent stem cells. The FASEB
Journal, 24(7), 22452253.
Mottram, D. S. (1998). Flavour formation in meat and meat products: A review. Food
Chemistry, 62(4), 9.
Peters, G. M., Rowley, H. V., Wiedemann, S., Tucker, R., Short, M. D., & Schulz, M. (2010).
Red meat production in Australia: Life cycle assessment and comparison with
overseas studies. Environmental Science & Technology, 44(4), 13271332.
Pimentel, D., & Pimentel, M. (2003). Sustainability of meat-based and plant-based diets
and the environment. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 78(3 Suppl),
660S663S.
Powell, C. A., Smiley, B. L., Mills, J., & Vandenburgh, H. H. (2002). Mechanical stimulation improves tissue-engineered human skeletal muscle. American Journal of Physiology. Cell Physiology, 283(5), C1557C1565.
Salvage, B. (2012). Are meat analogs in industry's future? http://www.meatpoultry.
com/Writers/Bryan%20Salvage/
Are%20meat%20analogs%20in%20industrys%20future.aspx?p=1 Accessed: March
27, 2012
Schabel, H. G. (2010). Forest's insects as food: A global review. In P. B. Durst, D. V.
Johnson, R. N. Leslie, & K. Shono (Eds.), Forest insects as food: Humans bite back
(pp. 28). Bangkok: FAO.
Skardal, A., Zhang, J., & Prestwich, G. D. (2010). Bioprinting vessel-like constructs using
hyaluronan hydrogels crosslinked with tetrahedral polyethylene glycol tetracrylates. Biomaterials, 31(24), 61736181.
Slingenbergh, J., Gilbert, M., de Balogh, K., & Wint, W. (2004). Ecological sources of
zoonotic diseases. Revue Scientique et Technique (International Ofce of Epizootics),
23(2), 17.
Song, Y., Manson, J. E., Buring, J. E., & Liu, S. (2004). A prospective study of red meat
consumption and type 2 diabetes in middle-aged and elderly women: The
women's health study. Diabetes Care, 27(9), 21082115.
Steinfeld, H., Mooney, H. A., & Schneider, F. (2010). Livestock in a changing landscape,
Vol. 2, Washington D.C: Island Press.
Takahashi, K., & Yamanaka, S. (2006). Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse
embryonic and adult broblast cultures by dened factors. Cell, 126(4), 663676.
Telugu, B. P., Ezashi, T., & Roberts, R. M. (2010). The promise of stem cell research in
pigs and other ungulate species. Stem Cell Reviews, 6(1), 3141.
Tonsor, G. T., & Olynk, N. J. (2011). Impacts of animal well-being and welfare media on
meat demand. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 62(1), 13.
Tuomisto, H. L., & de Mattos, M. J. (2011). Environmental impacts of cultured meat production. Environmental Science & Technology, 45(14), 61176123.
van der Valk, J., Brunner, D., De Smet, K., Fex Svenningsen, A., Honegger, P., Knudsen, L. E.,
Lindl, T., Noraberg, J., Price, A., Scarino, M. L., & Gstraunthaler, G. (2010). Optimization
of chemically dened cell culture media-replacing fetal bovine serum in mammalian
in vitro methods. Toxicology In Vitro, 24(4), 10531063.
Vandenburgh, H., Shansky, J., Del Tatto, M., & Chromiak, J. (1999). Organogenesis of
skeletal muscle in tissue culture. Methods in Molecular Medicine, 18, 217225.
Verbeke, W., Van Wezemael, L., de Barcellos, M. D., Kugler, J. O., Hocquette, J. F., Ueland, O.,
& Grunert, K. G. (2010). European beef consumers' interest in a beef eating-quality
guarantee insights from a qualitative study in four EU countries. Appetite, 54(2),
289296.
Verkerk, M. C., Tramper, J., van Trijp, J. C., & Martens, D. E. (2007). Insect cells for
human food. Biotechnology Advances, 25(2), 198202.
Verseijden, F., Posthumus-van Sluijs, S. J., van Neck, J. W., Hofer, S. O., Hovius, S. E., & van
Osch, G. J. (2012). Vascularization of prevascularized and non-prevascularized brinbased human adipose tissue constructs after implantation in nude mice. Journal of
Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, 6(3), 169178.
Visconti, R. P., Kasyanov, V., Gentile, C., Zhang, J., Markwald, R. R., & Mironov, V. (2010).
Towards organ printing: Engineering an intra-organ branched vascular tree. Expert
Opinion on Biological Therapy, 10(3), 409420.
Wilschut, K. J., Haagsman, H. P., & Roelen, B. A. (2010). Extracellular matrix components
direct porcine muscle stem cell behavior. Experimental Cell Research, 316(3),
341352.
Zammit, P. S. (2008). All muscle satellite cells are equal, but are some more equal than
others? Journal of Cell Science, 121(Pt 18), 29752982.