Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Connor, C., Alberto, P.A., Compton, D.L., and O'Connor, R.E. (February 2014) Improving Reading Outcomes for
Students with or at Risk for Reading Disabilities: A Synthesis of the Contributions from the Institute of Education
Sciences Research Centers, U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Special
Education Research.
This report describes what has been learned about the improvement of reading outcomes for children with or at risk
for reading disabilities through published research funded by the Institute of Education Science (IES). The report
describes contributions to the knowledge base across four focal areas: assessment, basic cognitive and linguistic
processes that support successful reading, intervention, and professional development.
Bart Boets et al. (2013) Intact But Less Accessible Phonetic Representations in Adults with Dyslexia. Science 6
December 2013: 342 (6163), 1251-1254. [DOI:10.1126/science.1244333]
People with dyslexia seem to have difficulty identifying and manipulating the speech sounds to be linked to written
symbols. Researchers have long debated whether the underlying representations of these sounds are disrupted in the
dyslexic brain, or whether they are intact but language-processing centers are simply unable to access them properly.
This study indicates that dyslexia may be caused by impaired connections between auditory and speech centers of the
brain. The researchers analyzed whether for adult readers with dyslexia the internal references for word sounds are
poorly constructed or whether accessing those references is abnormally difficult. Brain imaging during phonetic
discrimination tasks suggested that the internal dictionary for word sounds was correct, but accessing the dictionary
was more difficult than normal.
Don't DYS Our Kids: Dyslexia and the Quest for Grade-Level Reading
Proficiency
Fiester, L. (2012). Don't DYS Our Kids: Dyslexia and the Quest for Grade-Level Reading Proficiency . Commissioned by
the Emily Hall Tremaine Foundation in partnership with the Campaign for Grade-Level Reading.
About 2.4 million children across the nation have been diagnosed with learning disabilities but how successful is the
U.S. education system in teaching these students to read? This new report provides a far-reaching overview of the
history and progress in understanding and meeting the needs of children with dyslexia, as well as the persisting
challenges that must be overcome, to ensure that all students can read proficiently by the third grade. The report also
highlights best practices and examples of solutions that are already working in communities. Based on interviews with
nearly 30 experts, the report includes a collection of recommended actions for advancing this movement.
Dissecting Dyslexia
May, T.S. (2006). Dissecting Dyslexia. BrainWork, the Neuroscience Newsletter from the Dana Foundation.
Genetic differences in the brain make learning to read a struggle for children with dyslexia. Luckily, most of our brain
development occurs after we're born, when we interact with our environment. This means that the right teaching
techniques can actually re-train the brain, especially when they happen early.
Stanovich, Keith E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading: Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York:
Guilford Press.
From a nationally known expert, this volume summarizes the gains that have been made in key areas of reading
research and provides authoritative insights on current controversies and debates. Each section begins with up-todate findings followed by one or more classic papers from the author's research program. Significant issues covered
include phonological processes and context effects in reading, the "reading wars" and how they should be resolved,
the meaning of the term "dyslexia," and the cognitive effects and benefits of reading.
Rashotte, C. & Torgesen, J. (1985). Repeated reading and reading fluency in learning disabled children. Reading
Research Quarterly, 20, 180-188.
This study investigated whether improved fluency and comprehension across different stories in repeated reading
depend on the degree of word overlap among passages and whether repeated reading is more effective than an
equivalent amount of nonrepetitive reading. Non-fluent, learning disabled students read passages presented and
timed by a computer under three different conditions. Results suggest that over short periods of time, increases in
reading speed with the repeated reading method depend on the amount of shared words among stories, and that if
stories have few shared words, repeated reading is not more effective for improving speed than an equivalent amount
of non-repetitive reading.
About Reading
Kids & Family Reading Report: 5th Edition
Scholastic (2015) Kids & Family Reading Report: 5th Edition. New York: NY.
This biannual survey explores the reading attitudes and experiences that most influence children's reading habits, including reading
aloud at home, independent reading at school, presence of books in the home, and more. Findings from the 2014 survey show that
just over 1,000 children ages 6 to 17, only 31 percent said they read a book for fun almost daily, down from 37 percent four years
ago. The report asks what makes children frequent readers, creating two models for predicting children's reading frequency-one each
among kids ages 611 and 1217-constructed through a regression analysis of more than 130 data measures from the survey.
Across both groups, three powerful predictors that children will be frequent readers include: (1) the child's reading enjoyment; (2)
parents who are frequent readers; and (3) the child's belief that reading for fun is important.
How Well Are American Students Learning? With Sections on the Gender
Gap in Reading, Effects of the Common Core, and Student Engagement
Loveless, T. The 2015 Brown Center Report on American Education How Well Are American Students Learning? With sections on the
gender gap in reading, effects of the Common Core, and student engagement (March 2015) Washington, D.C. The Brown Center on
Education Policy, The Brookings Institution.
Part I of the 2015 Brown Center Report on American Education: Girls score higher than boys on tests of reading ability. They have for
a long time. This section of the Brown Center Report assesses where the gender gap stands today and examines trends over the past
several decades. The analysis also extends beyond the U.S. and shows that boys reading achievement lags that of girls in every
country in the world on international assessments. The international dimension recognizing that U.S. is not alone in this
phenomenon serves as a catalyst to discuss why the gender gap exists and whether it extends into adulthood.
the Casey Foundation offers recommendations for communities and policymakers to support early reading. Early reading proficiency
rates for the nation and each state are provided.
The Joy and Power of Reading: A Summary of Research and Expert Opinion
Bridges, L. (2014) The Joy and Power of Reading: A Summary of Research and Expert Opinion. New York: Scholastic.
This summary of research and expert opinion highlights the importance of reading volume, stamina and independent reading and
how that builds comprehension, background knowledge, vocabulary and fluency skills. The report also discusses the value of reader
choice and variety in developing motivation and confidence; guided reading and interactive read alouds in schools; and reading aloud
plus talk at home.
neighborhood levels of income accounted for the largest proportion of inequality in children's achievement. Neighborhood economic
status appears to be strongly associated with children's skills acquisition.
Adams, M.J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
This book reconciles the debate that has divided theorists for decades over the "right" way to help children learn to read. Drawing on
a rich array of research on the nature and development of reading proficiency, Adams shows educators that they need not remain
trapped in the phonics versus teaching-for-meaning dilemma. She proposes that phonics can work together with the whole language
approach to teaching reading and provides an integrated treatment of the knowledge and process involved in skillful reading, the
issues surrounding their acquisition, and the implications for reading instruction.
Amazon.com:
The classic book on phonics the method of teaching recommended by the U.S. Department of Education. Contains complete
materials and instructions on teaching children to read at home.
Ways With Words: Language, Life and Work in Communities and Classrooms
Heath, S.B. (1983). Ways with words: Language, life and work in communities and classrooms. Cambridge University Press.
This book is a classic study of children learning to use language at home and at school in two communities only a few miles apart in
the southeastern United States. 'Roadville' is a white working-class community of families steeped for generations in the life of textile
mills; 'Trackton' is a black working-class community whose older generations grew up farming the land but whose current members
work in the mills. In tracing the children's language development the author shows the deep cultural differences between the two
communities, whose ways with words differ as strikingly from each other as either does from the pattern of the townspeople, the
mainstream blacks and whites who hold power in the schools and workplaces of the region. Employing the combined skills of
ethnographer, social historian, and teacher, the author raises fundamental questions about the nature of language development, the
effects of literacy on oral language habits, and the sources of communication problems in schools and workplaces.
From
Diane
Ravitchs'
tribute
to
Jeanne
Chall,
in
the
American
Educator,
Spring
2001:
In 1961, as the debate about how to teach reading continued, the Carnegie Corporation of New York commissioned Jeanne Chall,
who was well established as a careful reading researcher, to review the controversy. Chall spent three years visiting hundreds of
classrooms, analyzing research studies, and examining textbooks; she interviewed textbook authors, reading specialists, and
teachers.
Chall found that studies of beginning readers over the decades clearly supported decoding. Early decoding, she found, not only
produced better word recognition and spelling, but also made it easier for the child eventually to read with understanding. The code
emphasis method, she wrote, was especially effective for children of lower socioeconomic status, who were not likely to live in homes
surrounded with books or with adults who could help them learn to read. For a beginning reader, she found, knowledge of letters and
sounds had more influence on reading achievement than the child's tested mental ability or IQ.
Struggling Readers
Mobilizing Volunteer Tutors to Improve Student Literacy: Implementation,
Impacts, and Costs of the Reading Partners Program
Jacob, R.T., Armstrong, C., and Willard, J.A. Mobilizing Volunteer Tutors to Improve Student Literacy: Implementation, Impacts, and
Costs of the Reading Partners Program (March 2015) New York, NY: MDRC.
This study reports on an evaluation of the Reading Partners program, which uses community volunteers to provide one-on-one
tutoring
to
struggling
readers
in
underresourced
elementary schools. The study showed that after one year of implementation, the program significantly boosted students' reading
comprehension, fluency, and sight-word reading three measures of reading proficiency. These impacts are equivalent to
approximately
one
and
half
to
two
months
of
additional
growth
in
reading
proficiency
How Well Are American Students Learning? With Sections on the Gender
Gap in Reading, Effects of the Common Core, and Student Engagement
Loveless, T. The 2015 Brown Center Report on American Education How Well Are American Students Learning? With sections on the
gender gap in reading, effects of the Common Core, and student engagement (March 2015) Washington, D.C. The Brown Center on
Education Policy, The Brookings Institution.
Part I of the 2015 Brown Center Report on American Education: Girls score higher than boys on tests of reading ability. They have for
a long time. This section of the Brown Center Report assesses where the gender gap stands today and examines trends over the past
several decades. The analysis also extends beyond the U.S. and shows that boys reading achievement lags that of girls in every
country in the world on international assessments. The international dimension recognizing that U.S. is not alone in this
phenomenon serves as a catalyst to discuss why the gender gap exists and whether it extends into adulthood.
Yoncheva, Y.N., Wise, J., and McCandliss, B. Hemispheric specialization for visual words is shaped by attention to sublexical units
during initial learning, Brain and Language, Volumes 145146, JuneJuly 2015, pages 23-33.
This study investigated how the brain responds to different types of reading instruction. Results indicate that beginning readers who
focus on letter-sound relationships, or phonics, instead of trying to learn whole words, increase activity in the area of their brains
best wired for reading. To develop reading skills, teaching students to sound out "C-A-T" sparks more optimal brain circuitry than
instructing them to memorize the word "cat." And, the study found, these teaching-induced differences show up even on future
encounters with the word. The study provides some of the first evidence that a specific teaching strategy for reading has direct
neural impact. The research could eventually lead to better-designed interventions to help struggling readers.
Begeny, J. C. and Greene, D. J. (2014), Can Readability Formulas Be Used to Successfully Gauge Difficulty of Reading
Materials? Psychology in the Schools, 51: 198215.
Teachers, parents and textbook companies use technical "readability" formulas to determine how difficult reading materials are and
to set reading levels by age group. This study from North Carolina State University shows that the readability formulas are usually
inaccurate and offer little insight into which age groups will be able to read and understand a text. In the study, 360 students (grades
2-5) read six written passages out loud. The researchers assessed the students performance, giving each student an "oral reading
fluency" score, which is considered a good metric for measuring reading ability. The researchers then used eight different readability
formulas to see which level each formula gave to the six written passages. Results varied widely, with one passage being rated from
first grade to fifth grade level. The levels assigned by the readability formulas were then compared with researchers assessments of
each students actual ability to read the material. Seven of the eight readability formulas were less than 49 percent accurate, with
the worst formula scoring only 17 percent accuracy. The highest-rated formula was accurate 79 percent of the time.
In this monograph, the researchers discuss 10 learning techniques in detail and offer recommendations about their relative utility.
The selected techniques are relatively easy to use and could be adopted by many students. Also, some techniques (e.g., highlighting
and rereading) were selected because students report relying heavily on them, which makes it especially important to examine how
well they work. The techniques include elaborative interrogation, self-explanation, summarization, highlighting (or underlining), the
keyword mnemonic, imagery use for text learning, rereading, practice testing, distributed practice, and interleaved practice.
the
Academic
Nye, C., Turner, H. M. & Schwartz, J. B. (2006) Approaches to Parental Involvement for Improving the Academic Performance of
Elementary School Age Children. University of Central Florida Center for Autism and Related Disabilities.
The purpose of this review was to summarize the most dependable evidence on the effect of parental involvement for improving the
academic performance of elementary school age children in grades K-6. This review found that parent involvement had a positive
and significant effect on children's overall academic performance. The effect was educationally meaningful and large enough to have
practical implications for parents, family involvement practitioners, and policymakers. When parents participated in academic
enrichment activities with their children outside of school for an average of less than 12 weeks, children demonstrated an equivalent
of 4 to 5 months improvement in reading or math performance.
ways to mitigate barriers by capitalizing on a range of funding sources, engaging in long-term planning to ensure adequate
attendance and hiring, and demonstrating positive student outcomes.
pediatrician,
neuroscientist,
and
member
of
the
National
Reading
Panel,
Dr. Sally
Shaywitz
talks
with Educational
Leadership readers about the ways the brains of young children develop and what can be done to prevent early learning difficulties.