Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
The most common cause of heart failure is left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction (about 60%
of patients). In this category, most cases are a result of end-stage coronary artery disease, either
with a history of myocardial infarction or with a chronically underperfused, yet viable,
myocardium. In many patients, both processes are present simultaneously (Fig. 2A). Other
common causes of LV systolic dysfunction include idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, valvular
heart disease, hypertensive heart disease, toxin-induced cardiomyopathies (e.g., doxorubicin,
herceptin, alcohol), and congenital heart disease (see Fig. 2B).
Heart failure is a common syndrome, especially in older adults. Although more patients survive
acute myocardial infarction because of reperfusion therapy, most have at least some residual LV
systolic dysfunction, which can lead to heart failure. Currently, 5 million Americans are afflicted
with heart failure, approximately 2% of the population. Patients with heart failure account for
about 1 million hospital admissions annually, and another 2 million patients have heart failure as
a secondary diagnosis. One third of these patients are readmitted within 90 days for recurrent
decompensation.
Patients at high risk for developing heart failure are those with hypertension, coronary artery
disease, diabetes mellitus, family history of cardiomyopathy, use of cardiotoxins, and obesity.
in EF. This is achieved by myocyte hypertrophy and elongation. LV chamber dilation causes
increased wall tension, worsens subendocardial myocardial perfusion, and can provoke ischemia
in patients with coronary atherosclerosis. Furthermore, dilation of the LV chamber can cause
mitral annular dilatation and mitral regurgitation, leading to pulmonary congestion.
In diastolic dysfunction, the primary abnormality is impaired LV relaxation, causing high
diastolic pressures and poor filling of the ventricle. To increase diastolic filling, left atrial and
pulmonary capillary pressures increase and pulmonary edema ensues. As a result, patients are
often symptomatic with exertion when increased heart rate reduces LV filling time and
circulating catecholamines worsen diastolic dysfunction.
The American College of Cardiology (ACC) and American Heart Association (AHA) have
developed a classification of heart failure based on stages of the syndrome . Stage A includes
patients who are at risk for developing heart failure but who have no structural heart disease at
present. The management strategy in this group is prevention of heart failure. Stage B includes
patients with structural heart disease but no symptoms. The management goal is prevention of
LV remodeling leading to heart failure. Stage C includes patients with structural heart disease
with current or prior symptomatic heart failure. Diuretics, digoxin, and aldosterone antagonists
may be added to angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and beta blockers, depending
on the severity of symptoms. Cardiac resynchronization therapy also may be considered. Stage D
includes patients with severe refractory heart failure. Physicians should consider either end-oflife care or high-technology therapies such as cardiac transplantation or mechanical circulatory
support, based on individual cases.
Table . American College of CardiologyAmerican Heart Association Classification of
Chronic Heart Failure
Stage
Description
A: High risk for developing heart Hypertension, diabetes mellitus, CAD, family history of
failure
cardiomyopathy
B: Asymptomatic heart failure
Previous MI, LV dysfunction, valvular heart disease
Structural heart disease, dyspnea and fatigue, impaired
C: Symptomatic heart failure
exercise tolerance
D: Refractory end-stage heart
Marked symptoms at rest despite maximal medical therapy
failure
CAD, coronary artery disease; LV, left ventricular; MI, myocardial infarction.
scheme is used to assess the severity of functional limitations and correlates fairly well with
prognosis
Table . New York Heart Association (NYHA) Heart Failure Symptom Classification System
NYHA
Class
I
II
III
IV
Level of Impairment
No symptom limitation with ordinary physical activity
Ordinary physical activity somewhat limited by dyspnea (e.g., long-distance walking,
climbing two flights of stairs)
Exercise limited by dyspnea with moderate workload (e.g., short-distance walking,
climbing one flight of stairs)
Dyspnea at rest or with very little exertion
On physical examination, patients with decompensated heart failure may be tachycardic and
tachypneic, with bilateral inspiratory rales, jugular venous distention, and edema. They often are
pale and diaphoretic. The first heart sound usually is relatively soft if the patient is not
tachycardic. An S3 and often an S4 gallop will be present. Murmurs of mitral or tricuspid
regurgitation may be heard. Paradoxical splitting of S2 may be present because of delayed
mechanical or electrical activation of the left ventricle. Patients with compensated heart failure
will likely have clear lungs but a displaced cardiac apex. Patients with decompensated diastolic
dysfunction usually have a loud S4 (which may be palpable), rales, and often systemic
hypertension.
Diagnosis
The initial evaluation of new-onset heart failure should include an electrocardiogram, chest
radiograph, and BNP assay. EKG findings of LV hypertrophy, left bundle branch block,
intraventricular conduction delay, and nonspecific ST-segment and T wave changes support a
diagnosis of heart failure. Q waves in contiguous leads strongly implicate a previous myocardial
infarction and coronary atherosclerosis as the cause. Chest radiographic findings of heart failure
include cardiomegaly, pulmonary vascular redistribution, pulmonary venous congestion, Kerley
B lines, alveolar edema, and pleural effusions.
The single most useful diagnostic test is the echocardiogram, which can distinguish between
systolic and diastolic dysfunction. If systolic dysfunction is present, regional wall motion
abnormalities or LV aneurysm suggest an ischemic basis for heart failure, whereas global
dysfunction suggests a nonischemic cause. Echocardiography is helpful in determining other
causes, such as valvular heart disease, cardiac tamponade, or pericardial constriction, and
provides useful clues about infiltrative and restrictive cardiomyopathies. Echocardiography can
also provide meaningful prognostic information about diastolic function, severity of hypertrophy,
chamber size, and valvular abnormalities. In many cases, however, the exact cause of the heart
failure cannot be discerned from the echocardiogram.
Cardiac catheterization can detect coronary atherosclerosis as the cause of heart failure. Severe
coronary artery disease is so prevalent that coronary angiography routinely should be performed
to exclude this cause and, if found, should lead to an assessment of myocardial viability, with a
goal of revascularization. Coronary computed tomographic angiography (CTA) might also be a
suitable alternative to exclude coronary artery disease in select patients.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is useful in assessing for arrhythmogenic right ventricular
dysplasia, myocardial viability, and infiltrative cardiomyopathies.
Objective information about functional capacity can be obtained from metabolic
(cardiopulmonary) exercise testing. This test can distinguish ventilatory from cardiac limitations
in patients with exertional dyspnea. A peak oxygen consumption higher than 25 mL/kg/min is
normal for middle-age adults, but a value lower than 14 mL/kg/min indicates severe cardiac
limitation and poor prognosis.
A useful diagnostic test for the detection of heart failure is the BNP assay. BNP levels correlate
with severity of heart failure and decrease as a patient reaches a compensated state. This blood
test may be useful for distinguishing heart failure from pulmonary disease. Because smokers
often have both these clinical diagnoses, differentiating between them may be challenging.
The routine use of invasive hemodynamic monitoring to guide the management of
decompensated heart failure has not proved to be beneficial. However, invasive hemodynamic
monitoring may be warranted if unanticipated responses to therapies are observed or for
diagnostic purposes if the diagnosis is uncertain.