Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
The n-period spot rate is the yield to maturity on a zero-coupon bond with
a maturity of n periods.
The short rate for period n is the one period interest rate that will prevail in
period n.
The forward rate for period n is the short rate that would satisfy a breakeven condition equating the total return on two n period investment
strategies. The first strategy is an investment in an n-period zero-coupon
bond; the second is an investment in an n-1 period zero-coupon bond
rolled over into an investment in a one-period zero.
Briefly describe APT and CAPM. What are the similarities and
differences?
CAPM is a model that describes the relationship between risk and
expected return and that is used in the pricing of risky securities.
APT is an asset pricing model based on the idea that an assets return can
be predicted using the relationship between that same asset and many
common risk factors. This theory predicts a relationship between the
returns of a portfolio and the returns of a single asset through a linear
combination of many independent macroeconomic variables.
APT VS. CAPM
- The single factor APT predicts the same expected return-beta relationship
as the CAPM
- APT does not impose any specific preference structure on investors. APT
only says that any arbitrage opportunities will quickly be traded away. In
CAPM all investors are mean variance optimizers.
- APT does not guarantee that the expected return-beta relationship holds
for single securities, only for well-diversified portfolios. CAPM states an
exact pricing relationship for every asset in the economy. Therefore, APT is
often said to impose much weaker assumptions than the CAPM
- In APT, the benchmark portfolio does not need to be the market portfolio
Describe the equity premium puzzle.
The equity premium puzzle is a phenomenon that describes the
anomalously higher historical real returns of stocks over government
bonds. The equity premium, which is defined as equity returns minus bond
returns, has been about 6% on average for the past century. It is supposed
to reflect the relative risk of stocks compared to risk-free government
bonds, but the puzzle arises because this unexpectedly large percentage
implies a suspiciously high level of risk aversion among investors.
The equity premium puzzle is a mystery to financial academies; the
difference is too large to reflect a proper level of compensation that
would occur as a result of investor risk aversion. Therefore, the premium
should actually be much lower than the historic average of 6%.
Explain the
difference
between the
CML and SML.
- The CML is a line that is used to show the rates of return, which depends
on risk-free rates of return and levels of risk for a specific portfolio. SML is
a graphical representation of the markets risk and return at a given time.
- While standard deviation is the measure of risk in CML, Beta coefficient
determines the risk factors of the SML.
- While the CML graphs define efficient portfolios, the SML graphs define
both efficient and non-efficient portfolios.
What are the advantages of the index model compared to the
Markowitz procedure for obtaining an efficiently diversified
portfolio? What are the disadvantages?
The advantage of the SIM, compared to the MM procedure, is the vastly
reduced number of estimates required. In addition, the large number of
estimates required for the MM procedure can result in large aggregate
estimation errors when implementing the procedure. The disadvantage of
the SIM arises from the models assumptions that return residuals are
uncorrelated. This assumption will be incorrect if the index used omits a
significant risk factor.
Figure 11.1
illustrates
the
response of
stock prices
to new
information
in an
efficient market. The graph plots
the
price response of a sample of firms that were targets of takeover attempts.
In most takeovers, the acquiring firm pays a substantial premium over
current market prices. Therefore, announcement of a takeover attempt
should cause the stock price to jump. The figure shows that stock prices
jump dramatically on the day the news becomes public. However, there is
no further drift in prices after the announcement date, suggesting that
prices reflect the new information, including the likely magnitude of the
takeover premium, by the end of the trading day.
Semi-strong form market efficiency focuses on the speed with which public
information is impounded into stock prices. News, that by definition are
unexpected, as they arrive, immediately impounded in prices. Therefore
the market is efficient at semi strong form.
The figure shows the reaction of stock prices to on air stock reports. The
chart plots cumulative returns beginning before the stock report.
Is this in accordance with EMH? There is no further drift in prices after the
announcement on TV, suggesting that prices reflect the new information.
This is in accordance to EMH.
They calculate earnings surprises for a large sample of firms, rank the
magnitude of the surprise, divide firms into 10 deciles based on the size of
the surprise, and calculate abnormal returns for each decile. Figure 11.5
plots cumulative abnormal returns by decile. Their results are dramatic.
The correlation between ranking by earnings surprise and abnormal
returns across deciles is as predicted. There is a large abnormal return (a
jump in cumulative abnormal return) on the earnings announcement day
(time 0). The abnormal return is positive for positive-surprise firms and
negative for negative-surprise firms. The more remarkable, and
interesting, result of the study concerns stock price movement after the
announcement date. The cumulative abnormal returns of positive-surprise
stocks continue to risein other words, exhibit momentumeven after the
earnings information becomes public, while the negative-surprise firms
continue to suffer negative abnormal returns. The market appears to
adjust to the earnings information only gradually, resulting in a sustained
period of abnormal returns. Evidently, one could have earned abnormal
profits simply by waiting for earning announcements and purchasing a
stock portfolio of positive-earnings-surprise companies. These are
precisely the types of predictable continuing trends that ought to be
impossible in an efficient market.