8/12/2015

Manuscript Submission and Review System: View Reviewer Feedback

IEEE Industrial Electronics Society

IECON 2015

IEEE IECON15 Manuscript Submission System

Comments from Reviewers Regarding Your Manuscript

YD-005479
Manuscript Information

View the submitted manuscript

Contact Person
Name (first, last): Dr. Mrinal Kanti Sarkar
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, NIT Durgapur, India, India
E-mail:
itsmrinal2u@gmail.com
Address:

Telephone:
Facsimile:

Dr. Mrinal Kanti Sarkar

Hardware Lab,
Department of Electrical Engineering, NIT Durgapur
India
+91-9434406937

Manuscript
Title:
Authors:
Technical Track:
Main Keywords:

DSP Based Implementation of Piecewise Linear Control Scheme for wide air-gap control of an Electromagnetic Lavitation System
Mrinal Kanti Sarkar, Subrata Banerjee
TT Control System and Its Applications
CC-50. Controller Hardware/Software CC-00. Computer and Control Systems

Author Database
1st author:
2nd author:

Dr. Mrinal Kanti Sarkar, Department of Electrical Engineering, NIT Durgapur, India <itsmrinal2u@gmail.com>
Prof. Subrata Banerjee, Department of Electrical Engineering, NIT Durgapur, India <bansub2004@yahoo.com>

Technical Details
Transaction Number: YD-005479
Data Type:
Date:
Origin:
Status:

pdf
1431095979
117.214.3.93/117.214.3.93
OK - submission completed

Feedback from the Reviewers

C. Clarity of presentation:
English grammar and spelling are proper ------------------------------------------ [3 - I agree]
Mathematical symbols and equations are easy to understand ------------------------ [3 - I agree]
Figures and tables are well constructed and informative -------------------------- [3 - I agree]
The paper is well organized ------------------------------------------------------ [2 - I am neutral]
Considering the issues above, the paper is readable ------------------------------ [2 - I am neutral]
T. Technical innovation and relevance
The authors cite other relevant publications ------------------------------------- [3 - I agree]
Authors describe relevance of work to the research field ------------------------- [2 - I am neutral]
The authors apply sound technical approaches ------------------------------------- [2 - I am neutral]
New ideas are convincingly and logically described ------------------------------- [2 - I am neutral]
Results are convincing ----------------------------------------------------------- [2 - I am neutral]
http://vps.ieee-ies.org/submit-cgi-bin/authorviewpaprev.pl

1/2

8/12/2015

Manuscript Submission and Review System: View Reviewer Feedback

Considering the issues above, this work should be presented --------------------- [2 - I am neutral]
Comments:
should include the comparative evaluations/discussions with
conventional approaches, to clarify the effectiveness of
the proposed one.
C. Clarity of presentation:
English grammar and spelling are proper ------------------------------------------ [3 - I agree]
Mathematical symbols and equations are easy to understand ------------------------ [3 - I agree]
Figures and tables are well constructed and informative -------------------------- [3 - I agree]
The paper is well organized ------------------------------------------------------ [3 - I agree]
Considering the issues above, the paper is readable ------------------------------ [3 - I agree]
T. Technical innovation and relevance
The authors cite other relevant publications ------------------------------------- [2 - I am neutral]
Authors describe relevance of work to the research field ------------------------- [2 - I am neutral]
The authors apply sound technical approaches ------------------------------------- [2 - I am neutral]
New ideas are convincingly and logically described ------------------------------- [2 - I am neutral]
Results are convincing ----------------------------------------------------------- [2 - I am neutral]
Considering the issues above, this work should be presented --------------------- [2 - I am neutral]
Comments:
This paper deals with a piecewise linear control for
magnetic levitation system. Contribution of this paper is
not strong. Authors should compare their proposed control
with other existing state-of-art controls.
The following is a minor comment:
In the title "Lavitation" -> "Levitation".
C. Clarity of presentation:
English grammar and spelling are proper ------------------------------------------ [2 - I am neutral]
Mathematical symbols and equations are easy to understand ------------------------ [3 - I agree]
Figures and tables are well constructed and informative -------------------------- [3 - I agree]
The paper is well organized ------------------------------------------------------ [3 - I agree]
Considering the issues above, the paper is readable ------------------------------ [3 - I agree]
T. Technical innovation and relevance
The authors cite other relevant publications ------------------------------------- [2 - I am neutral]
Authors describe relevance of work to the research field ------------------------- [3 - I agree]
The authors apply sound technical approaches ------------------------------------- [3 - I agree]
New ideas are convincingly and logically described ------------------------------- [1 - I disagree]
Results are convincing ----------------------------------------------------------- [3 - I agree]
Considering the issues above, this work should be presented --------------------- [1 - I disagree]
Comments:
The piecewise linear control scheme used in the paper seems
to be a standard technique. Further, there are lots of
researches that focus on control problems of electromagnetic
levitation systems having a large air-gap. Therefore, the
contribution of the paper is obscure.

Accepted or Rejected?
The manuscript is on the list of accepted manuscripts.
The manuscript is not on the list of rejected manuscripts.
The manuscript is not on the list of withdrawn manuscripts.
The manuscript is not on the list of registered manuscripts.
Done Viewing

http://vps.ieee-ies.org/submit-cgi-bin/authorviewpaprev.pl

2/2