Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS .......................................................................................................................i
List of Acronyms ..................................................................................................................................... iii
Executive Summary................................................................................................................................ iv
1.0
Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 1
2.0
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.0
4.0
4.1
4.2
4.3
5.0
5.1
Methodology ............................................................................................................................. 8
5.2
5.2.1
5.3
5.4
6.0
7.0
Recommendations .............................................................................................................. 11
7.1
7.1.1
7.1.2
7.1.3
7.2
7.2.1
7.2.2
7.2.3
7.3
7.3.1
7.3.2
7.3.3
8.0
8.1
Conclusions ............................................................................................................................. 14
8.2
References ................................................................................................................................................. 16
Annex A: Interview guide ..................................................................................................................... 18
Annex B: Key Informants .................................................................................................................... 20
Annex C: ICF Functional Model of Disability ..................................................................................... 20
Annex D: Summary of Transcribed Responses from Interviews ...................................................... 21
ii
List of Acronyms
ALP
C4D
CMT
CRPD
DFID
DHS
EMIS
GDP
GOM
Government of Malawi
ICF
IHS
MICS
MoE
Ministry of Education
NSO
PME
SNE
SOWC
UNESCO
USAID
WG
Washington Group
iii
Executive Summary
The World Education Forum held in Dakar in 2000 adopted the Dakar Framework for Action
(FFA) that called for inclusive education practices to ensure that groups of children who are most
vulnerable and disadvantaged are included in the education process and have access to schools.
Children with learning disabilities are some of the most vulnerable and disadvantaged in the
average school systems (UNESCO, 2009), and many of them are not accessing schools so we have
little information about their status.
National governments, especially in developing countries such as Malawi, have not focused
extensively on such vulnerable groups of children who are widely excluded from formal education
systems. Most of these countries do not have reliable or comprehensive data that can be used in
formulating and developing quality and effective education programmes that can address the needs
of children with disabilities.
UNICEFs States of the Worlds Children report of 2013 points out the extent to which children
with disabilities are excluded and marginalized from resources and social services. This exclusion
often stems from the invisibility of this vulnerable group of children. This invisibility in turn stems
from lack of reliable and comparable data and information that is required to place children with
disabilities more prominently on the development agenda.
In Malawi, some data on disability exists, but it is not comprehensive, providing only rough totals
of figures collected in a number of past household surveys and censuses, notably the 2008 census.
UNICEF Malawi has identified the need for comprehensive data on children with disabilities as
the basis on which effective programmes can be developed. Effective programmes for children
with special needs will be built on accurate awareness of the special needs of children with
disabilities (UNICEF Malawi, 2013). Specifically for education, developing quality education
programmes that address the special needs of children with disabilities relies on reliable
information and data for planning, monitoring and assessment.
This action learning project sought to identify the challenges that are encountered in collecting
data on children with disabilities. It also explored the gaps in data on children with special
education needs in Malawi. The project then explores possible strategies and tools that can be
employed to improve collection, storage and analysis of data on children with disabilities in general,
and special education needs in particular, in Malawi.
The recommendations from this project are:
-
UNICEF Malawi to undertake field testing of the new survey module on child functioning
and disability that has been developed by UNICEF and Washington Group. Testing the
module in Malawi will give the country opportunity to provide input to the final tool, thereby
ensuring that the tool is adapted to local context and any cultural and social concerns are
addressed before finalization of the tool.
Inclusion of the new disability module in the upcoming Demographic and Health Survey
(DHS) in Malawi in 2015 in order to collect and analyse comprehensive data on children with
disabilities to inform policy formulation, resource prioritization and to advance the inclusion
of these children in education and other social services.
iv
In addition to collecting periodic data through DHS and other Household survey tools,
UNICEF Malawi needs to support the strengthening of data collection at schools using
existing, but improved tools including annual school census and Education Management
Information Systems (EMIS).
-
Social and cultural practices within the country continue to encourage families to hide away
children with disabilities for fear of discrimination. A sensitization campaign is recommended
to address stigma and discrimination against people with disabilities.
The outcome for this project will be tested tools for data collection and analysis. The ultimate
result in the long run will be availability of high quality and comprehensive statistics on children
with special needs in Malawi that is comparable internationally and that influences the
prioritization of disability issues in the country.
This project has broadened my perspective and understanding of a key strategic area that is at the
core of the organizations focus. Working in this project has helped me to develop a number of
leadership competencies including formulating strategies and concepts, persuading and influencing
and relating and networking.
1.0 Introduction
We contribute to [] exclusion [of Children with disabilities] by failing to
gather enough data to inform our decisions. When we fail to count these
children, we are failing to help them count for all they should in their
societies.
Anthony Lake, Executive Director, UNICEF (State of the Worlds Children, 2013)
The World Education Forum held in Dakar in 2000 adopted the Dakar Framework for Action
(FFA) that called for inclusive education practices that are more child-centred and focused on
achieving good learning outcomes for all children, including those with a diverse range of abilities.
Such inclusive education practices would ensure that groups of children who are most vulnerable
and disadvantaged are included in the education process and have access to schools. Children
with disabilities are some of the most vulnerable and disadvantaged in normal school systems
(UNESCO, 2009).
National governments, especially in developing countries such as Malawi, have not focused
extensively on such vulnerable groups of children who are widely excluded from formal education
system. Most governments in developing countries have focused more on increasing the provision
of free and compulsory primary education, achieving gender equality and adult literacy.
Developing quality education programmes that address the needs of children with special needs
relies on reliable information and data for planning, monitoring and assessment. According to
UNESCO, many countries do not have reliable nor comprehensive data that can be used in
formulating and developing quality and effective education programmes that can address the needs
of children with disabilities.
UNICEFs States of the Worlds Children (SOWC) report of 2013 indicates the extent to which
children with disabilities are excluded and marginalized from resources and social services. The
SOWC report quotes a 2004 study in Malawi that found that a child with a disability was twice as
likely to have never attended school as a child without a disability. This exclusion often stems from
invisibility of this vulnerable group of children. The invisibility in turn stems from lack of reliable
and comparable data and information that is required to place children with disabilities more
prominently on the development agenda.
In Malawi, some data on disability exists, but it is not comprehensive, providing only rough totals
of figures collected in a number of past household surveys and censuses, notably the 2008 census.
UNICEF Malawi has identified the need for comprehensive data on children with disabilities as
the basis on which effective programmes can be developed. This is especially true for programmes
that address children with special education needs. Developing quality education programmes that
address the needs of children with special needs depends on reliable information and data for
planning, monitoring and assessment. Moreover, effective programmes for children with special
needs will be built on accurate awareness of the special needs of children with disabilities
(UNICEF Malawi, 2013).
barriers, individual prejudices and institutional discrimination that impose restrictions upon people
living with disabilities. The Act reflects the principles of the UN Convention on the Rights of
Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) which Malawi is a signatory (Chilemba, 2012). The country has
also ratified the CRPD (UNICEF, 2013). However, despite existence of these policies and
legislation, people living with disabilities are largely excluded from social services such as health
and education.
2.3 Special Needs Education in Malawi
Malawi is a signatory to several world declarations and agreements that advocate for the provision
of adequate education opportunities for learners with special needs. These agreements and
declarations include the pledge to the Salamanca Statement which advocates for inclusion of
learners with disabilities in the mainstream education and the Dakar Framework for Action that
addresses the right to education for all children, youth, and adults with disabilities (Chavuta et. al.,
2008). From these agreements, Malawi has developed strategies to respond to the educational
needs of learners with special educational needs. The national special needs education policy has
been established to provide a framework for Special Needs Education (SNE) in Malawi (MoE,
2009).
Provision of SNE services is predominantly done through special schools and resource classroom
centres within mainstream schools. Not all schools have established these centres, and hence the
few available ones are not adequate to accommodate all learners with special education needs in
Malawi (Chavuta et. al.).
Data from Malawis Education Management Information Systems (EMIS) shows that there are
93,656 and 2,911 learners with Special Needs in primary and secondary schools respectively
(EMIS, 2013). These figures may not reflect the actual number of learners with disabilities in the
country because education system in Malawi does not have formal assessment tools for
identification of disabilities. Moreover, the majority of children with disabilities do not attend
school, hence the numbers captured in EMIS grossly under-estimates the total number of school
age children with disabilities.
2.4 Scope and Limitations of the Project
This project will focus on addressing the gaps and the challenges of collection and analysis of data
on children with special education needs in Malawi. The bulk of the study will focus on educational
programmes for children with special needs and will not directly address programmatic issues of
other social programmes (such as health, nutrition, and child and social protection) and how they
relate to children with special needs. This smaller scope has been necessitated by the limited time
and resources available for the project
The deliverables for this project will be tested tools for data collection and analysis. The ultimate
result in the long run will be availability of high quality and comprehensive statistics on children
with disabilities in Malawi that is comparable internationally and that influences the prioritization
of disability issues and promotes inclusion of children with disabilities in the country.
UNICEFs Global Education Strategy and UNICEF's 20142017 Strategic Plan place special
emphasis on equity and improving learning outcomes for all children, especially children with
disabilities. It is hoped that the outcomes of this project will lead to enhanced availability of good
quality and comprehensive data on children with disabilities. This data will be critical in informing
development of sound policies that address the challenges faced by this marginalized group.
with disabilities from those without. Nonetheless, they conclude that inappropriate and
unnecessary labelling can lead to long term negative consequences for the affected children.
4.2 Lack of Comprehensive Data
The 2010 Education for ALL Global Monitoring Report on marginalization stated that the starting
point for extending education for disabled children should be a credible needs assessment based
on a national survey of prevalence of disability (UNESCO, 2010). However, the difficulty of
collecting useful data on children with disabilities that affect their access to school has been well
recognized (Croft, 2013 quoting Ainscow, 1999).
Eide and Loeb (2005) point out that data on disability in general is particularly weak in developing
countries. UNESCO (2004) concurs with this view with regard to disability data on education. It
states that existing data sets in developing countries are remarkably weak. The limited data available
shows that disabled children have very unequal access to education compared to non-disabled
peers (Bines and Lei, 2011).
Lack of reliable and adequate data has been a significant factor that has contributed to the neglect
of disability issues including policy development to address disability in many countries
(UNESCO, 2009). Without reliable statistical data, it has proved difficult to convince governments
and policy makers to prioritize disability issues on the development agenda (Eide and Loeb, 2005).
Mont (2007) further argues that availability of high quality, internationally comparable data on
disability that can be used for planning, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of inclusive
policies is often not available.
In addition there are major data gaps on school going children with disability. To make matters
even worse, few countries have developed systems that allow for counting of out-of-school schoolage children (UNESCO, 2009). According to UNICEF (2013), the lack of sound data on these
children renders them invisible to policy makers, social services providers and even to their own
communities.
In the face of all these challenges, the statistical view of global disability is largely based on
extrapolations and assumptions (Fujiura et. al., 2005; p.297). The Global Burden of Disease
estimated in 2004 that the prevalence of disability was at 19.4% of the global population while the
World Health Survey estimates gave a prevalence of 15.6% (WHO, 2008). Eighty percent of the
people living with disabilities worldwide live in developing countries (Munthali, 2011 quoting
Hope, 2003). Further, it is estimated 115 million children are out of school, and a third of these
are children with disabilities (Lawrence, 2004).
In 2003 and 2008 it was estimated that 4.18% of Malawis population consisted of people with
disabilities (Munthali, 2011). The 2008 census indicated that the prevalence of disability among
children was 2.4% (UNICEF Malawi, 2013). Bearing in mind the foregoing discussion on the lack
of reliable information, the estimates for Malawi may not be an accurate representation of the
situation on ground.
medical definitions of disability has led to low prevalence figures in Malawi. Broader definitions
that recognise social and environmental dimensions of disability have tended to provide more
reliable data. Data collection methods that incorporate the social dimension capture not only the
impairment but also the effect of that impairment on the functioning and participation of children
in their environment (Key Informant [P2], hence forth in this paper [Px] will denote Key Informant x).
The second challenge that is encountered in collecting data on children with disability is related to
the stigma that some people and societies associate with disability. Due to perceived stigma
towards children with disability, parents may be " careful not to admit that their child has
disability and will end up hiding the child [P3].
In addition, collecting data on children is difficult because the person giving this information is
usually not the child, but third parties such as parents. Parents will give you their opinion about
the child, and this opinion may not always be valid for certain cases of disability such as hearing
and sight. Furthermore, collecting data on disability in children is problematic because children are
in constant process of developmental change, and it can be difficult to distinguish activity
limitations of the child from variations in normal development.
In developed countries disabilities in children are identified through registries (e.g. Cerebral Palsy
Registry in Western Australia [P2]) and in medical and education settings. This identification
infrastructure is often lacking or weak in developing countries. In Malawi, schools fill out annual
census forms and submit these to district education boards. However, the forms are not elaborate
enough to capture all data on children disability such as the range of disabilities and the extent and
severity of disabilities. Moreover, teachers lack sufficient knowledge to routinely identify a wide
range of disabilities except the most extreme ones [P1, P6]. This problem is exacerbated by the
fact that in Malawi a large number of children with disabilities do not attend school.
5.3 Available Data on Children with Disability
In Malawi, the existing data on disability shows different prevalence levels depending on the tool
that was used to collect the data. According to data that was provided by key informants and also
obtained from various past surveys, the percentage of people with disability in Malawi varies from
2.9% (Survey of Handicapped Persons, 1983), to 14% (World Health Survey, 2003). The
prevalence of disability in Malawi was found to be 4.18% in a 2003 survey on living conditions
among people with activity limitations. These differences are large and may be attributed to the
way different survey tools were formulated and the type of definition that the particular survey
attached to disability.
As can be seen in Figure 1 below, some survey tools used questions that were skewed towards the
medical model, and some used questions that were out rightly stigmatizing. Tools that were based
on some type of activity limitations tended to have better results, though these also varied due to
lack of standardization and conformity of some questions to the social model of disability.
Figure 1: How Survey Tool Questions affected the reported Prevalence Rate of Disability in Malawi
As can be seen from Figure 1 above, some data on disability in Malawi is available. However, its
validity and accuracy is questionable as some of it was collected using tools that employed outdated
and stigmatizing terminologies. For instance, a 2004 Integrated Household Survey in Malawi had
a question that asked Are you physically or mentally handicapped in any way? Not surprisingly,
the final report from this survey did not include any data on disability.
Some data on specific areas of children with Special Education Needs is available. The department
of Special Needs at the Ministry of Education estimated that as of 2006, there were 43, 532 pupils
with Special needs of which 47% were girls. These data was collected through various sources
including school register systems, district education systems and national Education Information
Management System (EMIS). It was difficult to get information at one central place. Moreover,
the reliability and accuracy of this data was questioned by key informants [P1, P7]. As already
discussed in a previous section of this report, teachers lack sufficient knowledge to routinely
identify a wide range of disabilities except the most extreme or obvious ones.
5.4 Strategies and Tools for Disability Data Collection
In Malawi disability data has been collected through national censuses, Demographic Household
Surveys (DHS), Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys (MICS) and specific studies targeted at people
with disabilities. Some of these tools used questions that were considered outdated, derogatory
and stigmatising, as discussed above. For instance, the question from the household survey in
2004 (Figure 1) discussed in section 5.3 above had gone further to ask In what ways are you
handicapped: Lame; Blind; Deaf; mentally disabled? Data collected using poorly designed
tools was of poor quality and unreliable.
The stigma associated with disability was largely due to cultural beliefs and lack of awareness by
communities and caregivers [P3, P4, and P8]. In Montenegro, UNICEF supported a huge disability
10
awareness campaign dubbed "Disability is not inability" [P3] that resulted in increased reporting
and enrolment of children with disability in schools.
At the global level, UNICEF is working with The Washington Group (WG) on statistics to
improve the methodology and tools for collection of disability data. The module that is being
developed reflects current thinking on child functioning and disability and focuses on limitations
to activity without using stigmatizing terms. This module has standard definitions and
classifications of disability that are based on the framework of the ICF. The tool aims to produce
nationally and internationally comparable disability data.
The WG tool is currently being tested and refined. A number of country offices including
UNICEF Montenegro, have been involved in the testing of the tool. The results are reported to
be very promising [P3]. The tool is expected to be ready for use as a module in other surveys or
as a standalone data collection instrument by end of 2014 [P2].
7.0 Recommendations
7.1 Recommendation 1: Test the Washington group Survey Module
7.1.1 Description of Recommendation
The new survey module on child functioning and disability that has been developed by UNICEF
and Washington Group has so far been tested in a few countries including India, Cameroun, Haiti
and Montenegro. UNICEFs Data and Analytics Section in New York, the lead UNICEF section
that is working with Washington Group, plans further tests in additional countries. During
interviews, the Analytics section indicated their willingness to test the tool in Malawi if the country
office shows interest. They have gone further to promise funding and technical support should
the country office undertake to test the module.
11
In order for this recommendation to be implemented, the following UNICEF sections will need
to give their commitment to support and be involved: Planning Monitoring and Evaluation (PME),
Social Policy, Health and Education. Although the Data and Analytics Section has promised
funding and technical support, these three sections in Malawi will need to work with the researcher
and to engage key partners within the Ministry of Gender, Children, Disability and Social Welfare
and the department of Special Education.
Consultations between the researcher, PME and Social Policy sections have already commenced,
and if agreement to move ahead with the test is reached, then specific request will be made to Data
and Analytics section in New York. Bringing these different parties on board has presented a few
challenges.
7.1.2
One of the risks associated with this action is the lack of time to test the tool well. UNICEF Malawi
is currently involved in a midterm review, and as such staff are very busy and may not be available
to undertake another demanding task.
Another risk of carrying out the test is that the action of testing might create expectations that
support and resources will imminently be allocated to people living with disabilities, and so when
such support does not follow, the community may become disillusioned and will be reluctant to
participate in future surveys.
The benefits of carrying out the test far outweigh the risks. Testing the module in Malawi will give
the country opportunity to provide input to the final tool, thereby ensuring that any cultural and
social concerns are addressed before finalization of the tool. This involvement will also benefit
Malawi as it will present an early opportunity for the country to familiarise itself with the tool and
even translate it into local languages. This will save us time and effort when we get to use the tool
for actual data collection.
7.1.3
As stated above, the Data and Analytics Section in New York has indicated its willingness to
finance and support testing of the new disability module in Malawi. Discussions within UNICEF
Malawi on the way forward will need to be finalized by end of September 2014 and the decision
communicated to New York. I will need commitment from UNICEF PME and Social Policy
sections that they will invest the required time and involvement to test the module in Malawi. I
will also require commitment of key players from the Ministries of Gender, Children, Disability
and Social Welfare and Education to provide technical staff to attend training and undertake the
tests.
7.2 Recommendation 2: Inclusion of WG module in DHS 2015
7.2.1 Description of Recommendation
Malawi is just completing the fifth round of MICS. Unfortunately, the WG Module on disability
was not ready for inclusion into this survey. However, the next round of Demographic and Health
Survey (DHS) in Malawi will be done in 2015. The survey as currently designed does not include
12
One risk of pursuing this recommendation is that key partners may not be persuaded on the
importance and urgency of inclusion of additional questions to an already long survey instrument.
Additional questions will require more time and human and financial resources. This may
discourage key partners from adopting the recommendation.
Inclusion of WG disability module in DHS2015 will result in improved quality and reliability of
data on children with disabilities, and the data will be nationally and internationally comparable.
Improved reliability and quality of data will better inform policy, UNICEF programming and
resource allocation to efficiently and effectively address the challenges faced by children with
disability.
7.2.3
The decision to include disability module in DHS2015 has more or less been agreed within
UNICEF. Lobbying with the lead agency and National Statistical Office for inclusion of this
module should now commence and needs to be finalized by October 2014. Preparations for
translation of tool into local languages also needs to be planned even as we await the release of the
tool. Further, discussions with Data and Analytics section needs to be fast tracked to ring-fence
the funding that has been promised and identify technical support that will be provided.
7.3 Recommendation 3: Public Awareness Campaign on Disability
7.3.1 Description of Recommendation
The stigma associated with disabilities has rendered children living with disabilities largely hidden.
Social and cultural practices within the country continue to encourage families to hide away
children with disabilities for fear of discrimination.
A sensitization campaign is therefore recommended to encourage the social inclusion of children
with disabilities and reduce stigma. In UNICEF Malawi, the Communication for Development
(C4D) section is the technical team that would design and carry out these campaigns. Social Policy
and Child Protection sections should work with C4D to roll out an appropriate campaign prior to
the time that DHS2015 will commence.
13
7.3.2
A public awareness campaign may be viewed with apathy as just one of the many social
campaigns that people have seen in the past. The outcomes of the campaign may thus not go far
to address complex issues of stigma and discrimination of children with disabilities. This will lead
to another risk where programme implementers may see this as an approach that will only lead
to wasting meagre resources.
Nonetheless evidence from countries that have undertaken awareness campaigns on disability
has shown that this approach leads to remarkable results in addressing stigma. The Disability is
not inability campaign by UNICEF Montenegro resulted in huge increase in school attendance
of children with disabilities. In Turkmenistan, a unique approach to advocacy of disability using
puppet shows resulted in improved mainstreaming of disability in health, education and social
policy sectors. Hence if properly done, an awareness campaign will lead to better understanding
of disability and reduced stigma and discrimination.
7.3.3
The budget and work plan for C4D section in Malawi for 2014 is already in place. The author
will lobby C4D and Social Policy sections to include a budget line for disability awareness
campaign in early 2015 before DHS survey is conducted. The actual amounts required are still
being worked out.
surveys and other acts of data collection create an expectation in the population of children with
disabilities that something will be done to help them. It is therefore important that data collection
does not only result in improved availability of data for policy making but is also linked to provision
of services to children with disabilities. Such a linkage is likely to lead to improved cooperation
that will ensure that care givers and parents of children with disabilities continue to support future
information collection endeavours.
8.2 Leadership Lessons Learned
For my own leadership development, this project has broadened my perspective and
understanding of a key strategic area that is at the core of the organizations focus. Working in
this project, which is not within my area of specialization, has helped me to develop a number of
leadership competencies including formulating strategies and concepts, persuading and influencing
and relating and networking.
My ALP topic enabled me to look at current focus by UNICEF on equity in education. I explored
this area with assistance from key education and social policy stakeholders in UNICEF and
Government of Malawi. I believe I worked strategically to set and develop the strategies that I
used to achieve the outcomes of this project. In the implementation phase, I will further take the
opportunity to broaden my skills in formulating strategies and concepts.
Overall, I have had a unique opportunity to network and discuss disability issues with colleagues
in several UNICEF offices from Montenegro to New York, as well as experts in Government
ministries. At the onset of this project, I identified key players and decision makers in the area of
disability and inclusion. In my interactions with these key players, I was able to guide discussions
towards exploring the range of possibilities that can be pursued to address inclusion of children
with disabilities and thereby persuading and influencing key support for my ideas. I hope to
continue persuading and influencing experts in this field to work with me on the recommendations
that I have put across.
15
References
Bines, H. & Lei, P. (2011). Disability and education: the longest road to inclusion. International
Journal of Educational Development 31 (5), 419424.
Cappa, C. (2014). Strengthening statistics on children with disabilities: UNICEF's work and
planned activities. UNICEF, New York.
CDC Online. Retrieved on 25 April 2014 from
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/washington_group/wg_objectives.htm
Chavuta, A., Itimu-Phiri, A.N., Chiwaya, S., Sikero, N. & Alindiamao, G. (2008), A Baseline Study
on Inclusive Education.
Chilemba, E. (2012), Promoting disability rights in Malawi. Retrieved on 22-Aug-2014 from
http://www.osisa.org/law/blog/promoting-disability-rights-malawi
Croft, A. (2011). Promoting Access to Education for Disabled Children in Low-Income countries:
Do We need to know How Many disabled children there are? International Journal of
Educational Development 33, 233243.
DFID (2000). Disability, Poverty and Development. DFID, London.
DFID (2010). Disability and education: Bridging the implementation gap. DFID, London.
Durkin M.S. (2001), Measurement of Childhood Disabilities in Population Studies. United Nations
Seminar on Measurement of Disability, 46 June, New York.
Eide, A.H. & Loeb, M.E. (2005). Data and Statistics on Disability in Developing Countries.
Disability Knowledge and Research Programme. Overseas Development Group, London.
EMIS (2013), Education Statistics 2012. Ministry of Education, Malawi
Filmer, D. (2005). Disability, Poverty, and Schooling in Developing Countries: Results from 11
Household Surveys. Washington, DC, World Bank.
Fujiura, G., Park, H. & Rutkowski-Kmitta, V. (2005). Disability statistics in the developing world:
a reflection on the meanings in our numbers. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual
Disabilities 18 (4), 295304.
GOM (2010), Gender and Development Index, 2010. Government of Malawi.
Lawrence, j. (2004). The right to education for persons with Disabilities: Towards inclusion. World
Bank.
Loeb, M.E. & Eide, A.H.(2004); Living Conditions among People with Activity Limitations in
Malawi: A National Representative Study.
Mclaughlin, M.J. & Ruedel, K. (2005). Educating Children with disabilities: Who are the children
with disabilities? EQUIP2, Washington.
16
Metts, R., 2004. Disability and Development: Background paper prepared for the Disability and
Development Research Agenda Meeting, November 16. WorldBank, Washington, DC.
MoE (2009), Implementation Guidelines for the National Policy on Special Needs Education.
Ministry of Education, Malawi.
Mont, D. (2007). Measuring Disability Prevalence. SP Discussion Paper No. 0706. World Bank,
Washington, DC.
Mont, D. (2007a) Measuring health and disability. Lancet 369: 16581663.
Munthali, A.C. (2011). A situation Analysis of Persons with Disabilities in Malawi. Norwegian
Association of the Disabled (NAD).
NSO (2011). Third integrated household Survey 2010/11 Questionnaire. National Statistical
Office, Government of Malawi.
Robson, C. & Evans, P. (2003). Educating Children with Disabilities in Developing Countries: The
Role of Data Sets. OECD, Paris.
Shakespeare, T. & Watson, N. (2002. The social model of disability: an outdated ideology?
Research in Social Science and Disability, 2: 9-28.
Tongo M.D.C. (2007). Purposive sampling as a tool for informant selection. Ethnobotany
Research & Applications 5:147-158
UNESCO (2009), Towards Inclusive Education for Children with Disabilities: A Guideline.
UNESCO (2010) Reaching the marginalized. EFA Global Monitoring Report. Paris/Oxford:
UNESCO/Oxford University Press.
UNICEF (2013).The State of The Worlds Children 2013. Children With Disabilities.
UNICEF Malawi (2012). Country Programme Document, Malawi
UNICEF Malawi (2013), From Exclusion to Inclusion: Promoting the Rights of Children with
Disabilities in Malawi
UNICEF Turkmenistan (2012). Puppets to advocate for inclusion of children with disabilities.
WHO (2008). The Global Burden of Disease: 2004 Update.
World Bank (n.d), Country Data, Malawi. Retrieved on 22-Aug-2014 from
http://data.worldbank.org/country/malawi.
17
Introduction Key
Components:
Thank you
Your name
Purpose
Confidentiality
Duration
How interview
will be conducted
Opportunity for
questions
Signature of
consent
I want to thank you for taking the time to meet with me today.
My name is Simon Mwirigi and I would like to talk to you about your
experiences on availability of data on children with disabilities in General,
and children with special education needs in particular. Specifically, I am
researching on how we can promote inclusion of children with special
education needs by improving availability of Data on this special category
of children.
The interview should take less than an hour. I will be recording the session
because I dont want to miss any of your comments. Although I will be
taking some notes during the session, I cant possibly write fast enough to
get it all down. Because were on record, please be sure to speak up so that
we dont miss your comments.
All responses will be kept confidential. This means that your interview
responses will only be shared with LDP faculty and I will ensure that any
information I include in my report does not identify you as the
respondent. Remember, you dont have to talk about anything you dont
want to and you may end the interview at any time.
Are there any questions about what I have just explained?
Are you willing to participate in this interview?
__________________
Interviewee
__________________
18
__________
Date
Questions
No more than 15
open-ended
questions
Ask factual before
opinion
Use probes as
needed
2. How would you describe the adequacy & sufficiency of current data on
disability in general and children with Special Education Needs (SEN)?
-
What gaps are there in the current data on children with SEN?
Closing Key
Components:
Additional
comments
Next steps
Thank you
19
Organization
UNICEF Malawi
UNICEF Malawi
UNICEF Malawi
Ministry of Disability
National Statistical office
UNICEF Malawi
Ministry of Education
Ministry of Education
UNICEF New York
UNICEF Montenegro
Designation
Chief, Social Policy
Chief, Planning Monitoring and Evaluation
Monitoring and Evaluation Specialist
Senior Officer, Disability
Statistical Officer
Education Specialist
Chief Officer, Special Needs Education
Principal Officer, Special Needs Education
Statistics Specialist, Data & Analytics section
Social Policy and Equity Officer
20
P1
P2
P3
P4
P5
P6
P7
P8
P8 / P10
CATEGORY
(i) Schools do not keep statistics on children with
disability as they fear that keeping such statiscs is (i) Definition of disability that is relevant crossstigmatizing
culturally
Chall
enge
s
in da
ta Co
ll ecti
on
(ii) identification of children with disability/SEN (ii) Countries have used different methods and
challenges coz teachers are not knowlegeable on tools to collect data, so its not internationally
disability
comparable
(iii) Collecting data for children is more difficult
because this is done through third party. When
you inquire about children you go through parent,
(iii) potentioal identification systems such as Early but the parents will give you their opinion, so it is
Childcare Centres are weak so cannot identify challenging getting reliable information through
disability in children
parents
(iv) (what is considered mild) Mild disabilities
tend not to be reported, only reporting severe
(iv) There may be stigma accociated with giving
disbilites
certain disability information
(v) collecting data on disability in children is also
problematic beacues children are in constant
(v) bad classification of impairments
process of developmental change
(vi) Past Data collection tools used "offensive"
(vi) Poor data collection tools e.g. school census and stigmatizing terms. ".. They were asking, is
form not elaborate enough to capture full
there anybody in your household that is retarded,
information
crazy or handicapped, or crippled?"
(iii) Parents choose not to invest in children with (iii) Piece meal data, that is not in one place
disabilites instead educate those without, hence presents challenges in colecting in one place, and
discriminate against children with disabilities
analysing
(iv) National registration system, that would have
(iv) Current tools such as Household surveys,
improved and simplified data collection, does not
DHS, are not capturing data on disabilities
exist in Malawi
(v) Disability module that had been embeded in (iv) currently registration of chuildren in districts
MICS (in other countries) has not be used in
is very manual and done on book registers, by
Malawi because it had many shortcomings
hand
ildre
n
Gaps
fo
r Ch
(iii) EMIS does not have good data on SNE and (iii) Available data shows low prevalence.
Disability
Language used in tools is very outdated
abilit
y and
(iii) Welfare monitoring survey was done recently (iii) District prevalence of disability can be
and included collection of data on disability
provided, but this is upon request
on dis
Avail
able
data
Strat
egies
a
nd T
o
ols fo
r Da
ta Co
lle cti
o
with
s pe cia
l Edu
cati o
n
Nee d
s
(vii) Stigmatization may lead to parents hidding (vii) Narrow medical definitions yield lower
children with disabilities
estimates
(viii) Data collection for children is done thtough
their parents, and parents may not know all the
problems of the child e.g. dyslexia
(iii) Need additional funding to expand DHS and (iii) Mainstreaming of disability data collection in
census to include additional disaility questions
all research and data collection activities
(iv) Use of technologies to help gather data and
(iv) MICS and other HH survey tools can be
analyse data, eg. Existing information
used with additional disability questions
management systems
(vi) important to have more precise data in order (vi) Gaps in data on number of teachers trained
to prioritize issues of disabilities
for SNE
(v) Need more solid data in order to advbocate (vii) schools where SEN children are
better for chuildren with disabilities
attendingare known
(viii) only about 1% of teachers in the country
have been trained to handle special needs
(vi) Limited utization of available data
education
21