Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
• Recreation Centers
• Transit Terminals
• Museums
• Hospitals
• Libraries
• Offices
0 6-9
months
LEED Gold Timeframe – 2007 - 2008
0 1 month
Priority Permit - 2009
Environmental Review and Building Permit
Standard Timeframe – Present
0 Same
• Scope
•Commercial and
Residential
•New Construction
• Composition
•Owners
•Developers
•Financial
•Architects
•Engineers
•Contractors
• Emphasis
•Predictability
•Substantive
requirements
•Design Flexibility
August 4, 2008
Green Building Requirements
2008 Current 2010 2011 2012
New Commercial
Large
LEED Certified LEED Silver LEED Gold
≥ 25k ft
Mid-Size
LEED checklist + Local Priority Measures
5k – 25k sq ft
Renovations
First Time
Tenant LEED Certified LEED Silver LEED Gold
>25k sq ft
Major
Alteration LEED Certified LEED Silver LEED Gold
>25k sq ft
New Residential
High Rise
LEED Certified LEED Silver
≥ 75' height
GreenPoint
Small GreenPoints
25 GreenPoints GreenPoint Rated Rated - 75
≤4 units Checklist
Points
Local Priority Requirements
(2009)
Rating LEED Silver
20% Reduction
Indoor Water Use
(WEp1)
Category:
New Large Water Efficient 50% Reduction
Commercial Landscaping (WEc3.1)
Construction
Debris 75% Diversion
(MR 2.2)
Management
Historic Preservation
• Goals Mechanism
• Preserve historic • Preservation reduces
resources LEED requirement
• Retain embodied • Demolition increases
energy LEED requirement
Photo Courtesy: Adobe Systems
Green Building Growth
in San Francisco
As of 1/10/10:
20
18.9M sq ft
Million Square Feet
15
10
0
2004 2005 2006 2007 2,008 2009 2010
• Details: www.sfwater.org
San Francisco Greenhouse Gas Emissions
(2005)
Industrial
Municipal 10%
14%
Transportation Buildings
55% 45% Commercial Residential
39% 37%
Sources: PG&E, Hetch Hetchy Water and Power, CA. Dept of Transportation, MTC, Muni, BART.
Scope
• Existing Commercial
Composition
• Owners’
Representatives
• Property Managers
• Contractors
• Operators
• Engineers
• Architects
• Finance
• Utilities
The Task
• Cost effective energy
savings
• Minimum costs
• Measureable
Existing Commercial Buildings:
Proposed Goal
• Existing goals Figure 2: Energy and Climate Goals
are similar 120.0%
Applicable to San Francisco
SF Emissions Targets
60.0%
20.0%
0.0%
1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050
Existing Commercial Buildings:
Recommended Strategy
• Identify potential savings
• Enable informed decisions by all parties
• Engage tenants
• Submeter
• Educate and mentor
• Provide public financing
• Lead by example: Efficient public facilities
Existing Commercial Buildings:
Recommended Strategy
ECB: Impact Estimate
10-Year Net
Fraction of Maximum
Net Annual Present
Stock Annual Direct Job
Scenario Energy Value to
Audited Incentive Creation
Reduction Private
Annually Budget
Sector
Voluntary
Audits and 10%
CA Public (50% after 5 1.3% $24 Million $382 Million 357 Jobs
Goods years)
Incentives
20%
ECB
(100% after 4.2% $39 Million $612 Million 578 Jobs
Strategy
5 Years)
Energy Efficiency Program
• City of San Francisco and Pacific Gas Electric
Contract
• Benefits
– Free on‐site energy assessments
– Incentives
– Ongoing energy savings
– Services available in Spanish, Cantonese, and
Mandarin
– Save energy, money and the environment!
Recent Accomplishments
• From March ’07 to September ’09, SFEW:
– Paid out $4.3 million in incentives
– Saved over 1,400 Businesses more than $7 million
in energy costs
• Equivalent to saving:
– Over 50 million kWH and 18,000 Therms
– Over 15 thousand tons avoided GHG emissions
– Power for 7,250 homes for 1 year
2/25/10 v02
Property Eligibility
• Must be a property that pays property taxes
– Therefore excludes city/county buildings, public
schools, etc. (although may include non-profits)
• Property types
– Multifamily (> 4 units)
• E.g. Condos, apartments complexes
– Commercial
• E.g. Office buildings, malls, hotels, restaurants
– Industrial
• E.g. Factories, warehouses, industrial parks
28
Process: Micro-bond
Property Owner Administrator
3 Install Project
29
*Both the estimated rate and the final interest rate are dependent on market conditions at the time of submission.
Status: Benchmark & Audits
Benchmark and Audit Legislation
• Nearing completion
• Coordinating with:
– EPA Portfolio Manager upgrades
– AB 1103 Regulation development
– AB 758 linkage
– ASTM Building Energy
Performance Disclosure
(WK24707)
• Priority on minimizing cost and
additional paperwork
• Required by AB 1103 Challenging for Class B
• Simple rating • Commissioning
• More widespread use • Ventilation (ASHRAE
• Any building can use 62.1 2007)
Portfolio Manager • Supporting water,
– However, not all energy, waste, transit
buildings can get a codes, incentives &
rating resources
Portfolio Manager
Reporting
City requests Energy Performance Report
Mechanism by sending a link (email, post)
(Proposed)
(Illustrative
Interpolation
provided by SOM
Architects)
For More Details
Barry Hooper
barry.hooper@sfgov.org
Ph: (415) 355-3753
San Francisco Dept of Environment
www.sfenvironment.org/greenbuilding
SF Energy Watch
www.sfenergywatch.org
(also East Bay, Marin, San Mateo, Silicon Valley…)
Green Finance SF
www.greenfinancesf.org (also California First – June 2010)
AB 1103
www.energy.ca.gov/ab1103/
Automated Benchmarking
www.pge.com/benchmarking
San Francisco 24x7 Energy Challenge
www.sfenvironment.org/247