Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Roohollah Kalatehjari
Post-Doctoral Fellow, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi
Malaysia,81310 UTM Skudai, Johor Bahru, Malaysia
ABSTRACT
An important step in designing engineering structures in rocky areas is evaluation the stability
of rock slopes. Kinematic analysis as a purely geometric method is able to determine the
possible modes of failure in jointed rock slopes. The required geological study is performed
usually by utilizing walk over method as well as discontinuity surveys. This paper describes
the stability assessment of a railway trench by analysis of the geological structure using
stereographic projection technique. The studied trench is located at an entrance of a railway
tunnel near Veresk in North of Iran. A scanline method was carried out to record the properties
of discontinuities of the rock mass. Then after, daylight envelopes of stereographic projections
were used to recognize the modes of failure for each major joint set in the rock exposure. A
joint set was found in daylight envelope of toppling failure, while another joint set was defined
to cause a planar failure. As a result, it was concluded that there are probabilities of both
toppling, and planar failures along the trench face. Finally, some recommendations were
advised in designing a supporting system with the help of observation and result of
stereographic plot technique.
INTRODUCTION
Evaluation of the rock slope stability is a classic problem for geotechnical engineers, which
plays an important role in designing of trenches, dams, tunnels, and other engineering structures.
- 3401 -
3402
Moreover, identification of failure mode in rock slopes plays an important role in designing of an
appropriate supporting system. In the past decades, some researchers have focused on stability
assessment of rock slopes (Hoek and Bray, 1981; Goodman, 1989; Wyllie and Mah, 2004).
There are four primary modes of rock slope failure namely planar failure, wedge failure,
rotational failure, and toppling failure. A detailed review of different types of rock slope failures
has been presented by Goodman and Kieffer (2000). Influential factors in causing instability are
structural geology factors such as joints, faults and folds (Alavi Nezhad Khalil Abad et al., 2011).
Sliding of a rock mass on the joint/weak plane dipping away from the slope is termed as the planar
failure. It generally occurs in hard or soft rock slopes with well-defined discontinuities and
jointing, e.g., layered sedimentary rocks, volcanic flow rocks, block jointed granite, and foliated
metamorphic rocks. When two distinct planes of weaknesses, joints or fault planes exist, the rock
mass between these planes can slide down; this mode of failure is known as the wedge failure.
According to Kliche (1999), rotational failures are little-deformed slumps, which are slides along a
surface of rupture that is curved concavely upward. In slumps, the movement is more or less
rotational about an axis that is parallel to the slope. Toppling failure takes place when a regularly
spaced set of joints or bedding planes strike parallel, or nearly parallel, to the slope face and dip at
a steep angle into the face.
Stability charts for soil slopes were first produced by Taylor (1937) and then draw the
attention of many investigators to be used extensively as design tools (Hoek and Bray, 1981; Gens
et al. 1988). Unfortunately, no stability chart is available in the literature to assess the stability of
rock slopes based on rock mass strength criteria. Although the stability charts proposed by Hoek
and Bray (1981) for Mohr-Coulomb material can be applied to rock slopes, this requires
knowledge of the equivalent Mohr-Coulomb cohesion and friction for the rock mass. Besides,
numerous studies have been performed to determine failure modes by stereographic projection
technique (Goodman, 1976; Hocking, 1976; Hoek and Bray, 1981; Matherson, 1988; Markland,
1972; Cruden, 1978). In this study, stability assessment of a railway trench is performed by
analysis of the geological structure using stereographic projection technique.
SITE LOCATION
This study was carried out on a trench located at an entrance of a railway tunnel near Veresk
(Figure 1) in North of Iran (latitude: 3554'26.73"N and longitude: 5259'27.94"E).
This site was selected for the study due to high suspicious of failure in this area as it had
specific geological structure. It is important to evaluate instability of the trench and find out the
type of possible failure to design an appropriate supporting system for failure prevention. The
mentioned area consists of multi layers of rock as marl, thin shale, and siltstone which based on
geology map (Figure 2) belong to Barout zone. The geological age of the mentioned area is
Precambrian. There is an anticline in the studied area. The geometry of the trench is as length of
130 m, height of 21 m, and slope angle of 78. The orientation of trench is 6 from North. Figure
3 shows the overview of Veresk trench.
3403
3404
3405
Cohesion (kPa)
250
cm (MPa)
4.7
Edm (GPa)
2.3
3406
3407
Figure 7 shows the major joint sets of the trench and daylight envelops for Planar failure. It is
seen that joint set number 3 is caused planar failure in Veresk trench. It is clear that this joint set is
located near the black zone.
3408
In order to prevent water flow into the joints, a reinforced shotcrete layer with
thickness of 5 to 10 cm should be applied.
In order to decrease the probability of both planar and toppling failures, a retaining
wall with minimum height of 10 m (about half of trench height) should be
constructed.
In order to collect the rain water, water channels should be installed in the
upstream of the trench.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors would like to thank Universiti Teknologi Malaysia for its financial support.
REFERENCES
1. Alavi Nezhad Khalil Abad, S. V, Mohamad, E. T., Jahanmirinezhad, H., Hajihassani,
M., and Namazi, E (2011). Zonation of landslide hazards based on weights of
evidence modeling along Tehran-Chalos Road Path, Iran. Electronic Journal of
Geotechnical Engineering, 16.
2. Cruden, D. M (1978) Discussion of G. Hockings paper A Method for
Distinguishing Between Single and Double Plane Sliding of Tetrahedral Wedges.
Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech Antoine, M. M. and J. M. Bradford (1982)
Parameters for Describing Soil Detachment due to Single-Water Impact, Sad Sam
Soc. Am. J., 46, 36-840.
3. Gens A, Hutchinson J.N., and S. Cavounidis (1988) Three-dimensional analysis of
slides in cohesive soils. Gotechnique 38:1, 1-23
4. Goodman, R. E (1976) Methods of Geological Engineering in Discontinuous Rocks.
West Publishing, San Francisco.
5. Goodman, R.E (1989) Introduction to Rock Mechanics. 2nd edition. Wiley, New
York. 562 pp.
6. Goodman, R. E. and D. S. Kieffer (2000) Behaviour of rocks in slopes. J. Geotech and
Geoenvi. Eng., ASCE, 126:8, 675-684
3409
7. Hocking, G (1976) A Method for Distinguishing Between Single and Double Plane
Sliding of Tetrahedral Wedges, Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstr. 13,
pp. 225226.
8. Hoek, E. and J.W. Bray (1981) Rock Slope Engineering Institution of Mining and
Metallurgy, London.
9. Kliche, C. A (1999). Rock slope stability. SME. Littleton, CO.
10. Markland, J. T (1972) A Useful Technique for Estimating the Stability of Rock Slopes
When the Rigid Wedge Sliding Type of Failure is Expected. Imp. Coll. Rock Mech.
Res.
11. Matherson, G.D. (1988) The Collection and Use of Field Discontinuity Data in Rock
Slope Design, Q. J. Eng. Geol.22, pp. 1930.
12. Mohamad, E. T., and Alavi Nezhad Khalil Abad, S. V (2011). Assessment on
BlastingInduced Rock Slope Instability At Johor, Malaysia. Electronic Journal of
Geotechnical Engineering, 16.
13. Taylor, D.W. (1937) Stability of earth slopes. J. Boston Soc. Civ. Eng., 24, 197246.
14. Wyllie, Duncan, C. and C. W. Mah (2004) Rock Slope Engineering: Civil and Mining,
4th edition, Spon Press.
2013 ejge