Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
20
Activism
Mazur, J. (2006). Learning and behavior (6th ed.). Upper
Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
McGlone, M. S., & Aronson, J. (2007). Forewarning
and forearming stereotype-threatened students.
Communication Education, 56(2), 119133.
Mueller, C. M., & Dweck, C. S. (1998). Praise for
intelligence can undermine childrens motivation and
performance.
Journal
of
Personality
and
Social Psychology, 75(1), 3352. doi:10.1037/00223514.75.1.33.
Pintrich, P. R., Conley, A. M., & Kempler, T. M. (2003).
Current issues in achievement goal theory and
research. International Journal of Educational
Research,
39,
319337.
doi:10.1016/j.
ijer.2004.06.002.
Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal
versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80(1), 128.
doi: 10.1037/h0092976
Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes
shape intellectual identity and performance. American
Psychologist, 52(6), 613629. doi: 10.1037/0003066X.52.6.613
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated
learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41, 6470.
Online Resources
Dwyer, C. (n.d.). Using praise to enhance student
resilience and learning outcomes. American Psychological Association. Retrieved January 8, 2013, from
http://www.apa.org/education/k12/using-praise.aspx
Locus of Control Online Test. http://www.psych.uncc.
edu/pagoolka/LocusofControl-intro.html
Motivation, Power & Achievement Society. http://www.
mpa-society.org/
References
Activism
Carducci, B. (2009). The psychology of personality (2nd
ed.). Chichester, England: Wiley-Blackwell.
Dweck, C. S. (1999, Spring). Caution praise can be dangerous. American Educator, 23(1), 15. Retrieved April
3, 2012, from http://www.sde.ct.gov/sde/lib/sde/pdf/
cali/praisespring99.pdf
Elliot, A. J., & Dweck, C. S. (2005). Competence and
motivation: Competence as the core of achievement
motivation. In A. Elliot & C. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook
of competence and motivation (pp. 312). New York,
NY: The Guilford Press.
Hart, W., & Albarracn, D. (2009). The effects of chronic
achievement motivation and achievement primes on
the activation of achievement and fun goals. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 97(6), 11291141.
doi:10.1037/a0017146.
Huang, C. (2011). Achievement goals and achievement emotions: A meta-analysis. Educational
Psychology Review, 23, 359388. doi:10.1007/
s10648-011-9155-x.
Introduction
The relationship between psychology and activism has taken many forms. Throughout the
history of the discipline, psychologists have
used psychological research in order to understand and address issues of inequality and injustice, to promote social and political change, while
Activism
Definition
Activism refers to actions that are directed
toward effecting sociopolitical change on
a number of potential dimensions including precisely articulated policy reforms to broader disruptions of hegemonic values and practices.
Activism is rooted in political ideologies and
can often be historically situated in broader social
and political movements. Critical psychology
conceptualizes activism as being specifically
concerned with systems of domination and
inequality such as capitalism, patriarchy, white
supremacy, settler colonialism, heteronormativity, and ableism. Conceptually, activism
can take a multitude of forms, within and across
a spectrum of collective, individual, deliberate,
and spontaneous actions. Some common
approaches to activism include public demonstration, civil disobedience, community building,
economic boycott, lobbying, propaganda, riots,
critical consciousness raising, and strike action.
Keywords
Feminism; liberation psychology; social movement; oppression; injustice; social change
21
History
Activism has a rich, though often forgotten, history in psychology. While the discipline of psychology is itself embedded within sociopolitical
systems that create and reproduce structural
inequalities, there are enduring traditions of
using psychological theories and methods to
challenge injustice. The relationship between
psychology and activism has taken a number of
different, sometimes overlapping, forms including using psychological research as a way of
enacting activism, as a way of understanding or
conceptualizing activism, or as a way of
documenting critical sociopolitical struggles,
movements, and/or counternarratives, as well as
political organizing by psychologists to challenge
injustice within and beyond the discipline.
Research as Activism
One of the fields earliest examples of psychological research as activism is Leta Hollingworths
(18861939) feminist work on sex discrimination
and womens employment. Hollingworth was
a founding member of the Feminist Alliance,
a group dedicated primarily to fighting sex discrimination in womens access to employment
(Rutherford, Marecek, & Sheese, 2012). As chair
of the Alliances Committee on the Biologic Status of Women, Hollingworth collaborated with
Robert Lowie, a former student of cultural anthropologist Franz Boas, on an article for The Scientific Monthly entitled, Science and Feminism.
In their article, Hollingworth and Lowie
(1917) argued that empirical data should be used
to justify feminist objectives, reviewing anthropological, anthropomorphic, and psychological
research that would support the alleged unfitness
of women to undertake certain forms of activity
(p. 277). Following her review of evidence regarding womens intellectual inferiority, Hollingworth
noted that beliefs about female inferiority were
unfounded (Rutherford et al., 2012).
More explicitly addressing issues of power and
oppression and rejecting the apolitical stance of
mainstream psychology in North America during
the Cold War, the work of Ignacio Martn-Baro
demonstrates the effort to develop psychological
22
Activism
Activism
political movements of the 1960s. These psychologists began to form organizations that would
support the development of feminist research,
practice, and activism. At the 1969 APA convention, a number of unofficial, independently organized symposia, paper sessions, and workshops
on womens issues drew hundreds of attendees.
A number of petitions were circulated during
these sessions, including one demanding that the
APA examine and address sexist discrimination
in the organization and in psychology departments and another calling for an APA resolution
recognizing abortion as a civil right of pregnant
women (Rutherford et al.). These activities fostered ongoing political discussion and organizing
and eventually led to the formation of the Association for Women in Psychology (AWP), an
organization whose primary focus continues to
be on feminist activism. The AWP, along with
other organizations such as the Feminist Therapy
Institute, established in 1983, worked to challenge a wide range of concerns within the discipline, including existing codes of ethics in
clinical psychology, gender bias in psychiatric
diagnosis, and assumptions about the psychological natures of women and men. Feminist psychologists have also organized to address a broad
range of social issues beyond the discipline itself,
including reproductive justice, violence against
women, and intersecting systems of oppression
such as racism, classism, and ableism.
In more recent history, during the height of
Bushs War on Terror, a group of psychologists
formed an organization, Coalition for an Ethical
Psychology, to challenge American Psychological Associations (APA) continual involvement
with the interrogation and torture of political
prisoners. The coalition called to annul the 2005
Report of the Presidential Task Force on Psychological Ethics and National Security (the PENS
Report) which suggested that psychologists
played a critical role in keeping interrogations
safe, legal, ethical, and effective. The coalition
argues that this stance contradicts the international human rights as well as psychologist professional ethical standards and thus must be
annulled and discontinued to be held as
23
Critical Debates
One of the major tensions in the relationship
between psychology and activism is the interaction of theory and practice. Ian Parker is one of
the psychologists who has called attention to the
problem of depoliticization of the discipline and
the need to synthesize psychological knowledge
in activist work. In Revolution In Psychology:
Alienation to Emancipation, Parker (2007)
argues that psychology has become an alienating
science in which it either appropriates common
knowledge as disciplinary expertise or flattens
useful knowledge into readily consumable commodities. The result in either case is that people
are alienated from knowledge. Parker proposes
a set of transitional demands that would shift the
discipline away from its present operation as
a technology of social control toward
a becoming tool of emancipation. For Parker,
this transformation cannot be realized through
mere internal reform nor separated from other
social movements. To attempt meaningful transformation of the discipline in such a way would
simply bolster psychologys operation as an
alienating science by further professionalizing
knowledge to be guarded within a narrow pool
of scholars.
While the field of critical psychology is
emerging and consolidating, there is also a risk
of it becoming merely a new commodity that
24
References
Cantril, H. (1941/2002). The psychology of social movements. NJ: Rutgers.
Activism
Clark, K. B., & Clark, M. K. (1939). The development of
consciousness of self and the emergence of racial
identification in Negro preschool children. Journal of
Social Psychology, 10(4), 591599.
Coalition for an Ethical Psychology. (2011). Background
statement on annulment of the APAs PENS report.
Retrieved from http://www.ethicalpsychology.org/
materials/PENS_Annulment_Background_Statement.
pdf.
Deegan, M. (1988). W.E.B. Du Bois and the women of
hull-house, 18951899. The American Sociologist,
19(4), 301311.
Fine, M., & Burns, A. (2003). Class notes: Toward
a critical psychology of class and schooling. Journal
of Social Issues, 59(4), 841860.
Fine, M., & Torre, M. E. (2006). Intimate details: Participatory action research in prison. Action Research,
4(3), 253269.
Fox, M., & Fine, M. (2012). Circulating critical research:
Reflections on performance and moving inquiry into
action. In G. Cannela & S. Steinberg (Eds.), Critical
qualitative research reader (pp. 153165). New York:
Peter Lang.
Hollingworth, L. (1914). Variability as related to sex
differences in achievement. American Journal of
Sociology, 19, 510530.
Lykes, M. B., & Coquillon, E. D. (2009). Psychosocial
trauma, poverty, and human rights in communities
emerging from war. In D. Fox, I. Prilleltensky, & S.
Austin (Eds.), Critical psychology II (pp. 285299).
London: Sage.
Parker, I. (2007). Revolution in psychology: Alienation to
emancipation. London: Pluto Press.
Parker, I. (2009). Critical psychology and revolution
Marxism. Theory & Psychology, 19(1), 7192.
Pettit, M. (2011). The SPSSI task force on
sexual orientation, the nature of sex, and the
contours of activist science. Journal of Social Issues,
67, 92105.
Reisner. (2003). Psychic trauma and the seductions of
a painful past. Studies in Gender and Sexuality, 4(3),
263286.
Rutherford, A., Marecek, J., & Sheese, K. (2012).
Psychology of women and gender. In D. K.
Freedheim & I. Weiner (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: History of psychology (pp. 279301). Hoboken,
NJ: Wiley.
Rutherford, A., Unger, R., & Cherry, F. (2011).
Reclaiming SPSSIs sociological past: Marie Jahoda
and the immersion tradition in social psychology.
Journal of Social Issues, 67(1), 4258.
Solomon, F., & Fishman, J. R. (1964). Youth and peace:
A psychosocial study of student peace demonstrators
in Washington, DC. Journal of Social Issues, 20(4),
5473.
Torre, M. E., & Fine, M. (2011). A wrinkle in time:
Tracing a legacy of public science through community
self-surveys and participatory action research. Journal
of Social Issues, 67(1), 106121.