Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Ishikawa was also a recipient of the Second Order of the Sacred Treasure
from the Emperor of Japanthe same recognition bestowed upon W. Edwards
Deming and Joseph M. Juran.
(D)
diagram, and the quality chain. His approach to TQM comes very close to todays
understanding of TQM. As Ishikawa remarks, Japanese quality control is a thought
revolution in management. It is an approach representing a new way of thinking
about management. To meet this goal, everyone in the company must participate in
and promote quality control, including top executives, all divisions within the
company, and all employees (Ishikawa, 1985). To practice quality control is to
develop, design, produce and service a quality product which is most economical,
most useful, and always satisfactory to the consumer.
Top management has to lead by example and to demonstrate actively that they
are serious about quality. TQM involves everyone within the company; every
employee should contribute his ideas of how to improve the work processes. In this
definition, Ishikawa covers a number of key elements of total quality (Yamashina,
2000).
TQM emphasises a clear customer orientation - internal and external. The needs
of the customer have to be satisfied. TQM is not limited to the quality department but
involves all departments within the business organisation.
Ishikawa (1985) identified 14 areas of difference between Japan and the West.
However, there are 6 points, which deserve our attention (Table 8).
Ishikawa (1985) claims that TQM begins with education and ends with education.
Ishikawa considers the implementation of quality circles as an effective way of
getting the shop floor involved in the quality issue. This involvement of all
employees in the companys problem-solving process requires a continuous education
and training of everyone in the company. He describes the importance not only of
meeting the requirement of the external customer, but also of paying attention to
"internal" customers and internal relationships. He develops a continuous line of
internal supplier-customer relations and invented the term "The next process is your
customer" (Yamashina, 2000).
Ishikawa stresses the importance that, QC training and education must also be
carried out without interruption, through good times and bad.
The Japanese quality expert defines as the aim for a training programme that quality
should be made everybodys concern. Every employee should understand the new
philosophy of quality. Moreover, everyone should grasp the tools and techniques of
TQM (Martinez-Lorente et al., 1998).
It must be the common goal of each department to fully satisfy this customer.
Therefore it would be helpful if the next work process and the next workstation,
which
builds on the added value and work of the previous workstation, were considered as
a customer. Sectionalism must be broken down. Every employee should be able to
talk to other department members freely and frankly. It is necessary to learn to think
from the standpoint of the other party (Hellsten and Klefsjo, 2000; Ip et al., 1999). All
the different departments within the company are living from the very same external
customer. The next work process should be treated like the external customer. We
can agree that Ishikawa has contributed and formed a number of important ideas in
todays understanding of TQM.
(B)
(C)
2.
sss
Manufacturing problems are very crucial, needs vigilant and immediate
attention otherwise it damages to companys not only profit margins but also
reputation. Quality Management includes quality assurance and control, is very
necessary technique to maintain and continuously improve quality of product.
Out of many techniques used to improve quality, reduce rejection, Ishikawa
diagram is very well known and widely used. Ishikawa diagram is very useful
to identify the probable causes of error or problem from different prospective.
IMPORTANCE OF FISHBONE IN PRODUCT IMPROVEMENT:
Ishikawa diagrams also known as fishbone or cause & effect diagram, was
invented by Kaoru Ishikawa in the 1960s, he is pioneered quality management
processes. The design of the diagram is similar to the skeleton of a fish. The
representation can be simple, through bevel line segments which lean on a
horizontal axis. The root causes and sub-causes which produce the problem or
defect are represented in that respective heads. The causes of problem or
imperfection can be grouped into categories like Man (People), Machine,
Material, Method and environment, represented in diagram as shown in fig.1.
Sometimes these can be grouped into other two categories as well such as
management and measurements but that depends on the purpose of use
The Ishikawa diagram method becomes more powerful tool when its
used with brainstorming and cross functional team, which helps to identify
causes of problem with different point of view. All root causes identified, then
to be listed and consensus will finalize. Some times other tool like FMEA or
Pareto may be used to priorities the various causes identified. The ultimate aim
of the tool is to improvement. The Ishikawa diagram is such global tool and
used in various industry segments like
10
3.
4.
ISHIKAWA DIAGRAMS
Ishikawa diagrams are named after their inventor, Kaoru Ishikawa. They
are also called fishbone charts, after their appearance, or cause and effect
diagrams after their function. Their function is to identify the factors that are
causing an undesired effect (e.g., defects) for improvement action, or to identify
the factors needed to bring about a desired result (e.g., a winning proposal).
The factors are identified by people familiar with the process involved.
As a starting point, major factors could be designated using the "four M's":
Method, Manpower, Material, and Machinery; or the "four P's":
Policies,
Procedures, People, and Plant. Factors can be subdivided, if useful, and the
11
ISHIKAWA
The traditional Ishikawa diagram is a qualitative tool of management [1].
Using this tool one can show the relations between causes and the analyzed
effect. The most often used is the Ishikawa diagram in a form called the model
6M+E [2]. The symbol 6M+E describes next general causes: man, machine,
material, method, management, measurement and environment.
This diagram is presented in the Fig. 1.
The model of the classical Ishikawa diagram is not complete.
There is no quantitative information to obtain from this diagram [3], [4],
[5]. This need was the origin of the weighted Ishikawa diagram. The change of
the diagram is considered with the character of the connections (bones) of the
diagram [6], [7]. In this paper there is proposed a completing of the diagram
with connections weights. Below is presented the method of preparing the
weighted Ishikawa diagram [8]:
determination of a set of main causes
determination of subcauses
determination of weights of main causes
preparing the weighted Ishikawa diagram
conducting the stratification analysis
determination the set of important causes and subcauses
Applying presented above levels makes possible to construct a complete
management tool: the weighted Ishikawa diagram. To determine the weights of
connections (causes) it is proposed to use a form of the Saaty matrix [9]. In this
paper this matrix is called the comparison matrix (Fig. 2).
12
(G)
6.
QUALITY CONTROL
To practice quality control is to develop, design, produce and service a
quality product, which is most economical, most useful, and always satisfactory
to the consumer. To meet this goal, everyone in the company must participate in
and promote quality control, including top executives, all divisions within the
company, and all employees (Ishikawa, 1985).
Ishikawa provided four aspects of TQM quality circles, continuous
training, the quality tool Ishikawa diagram, and the quality chain. According
to Ishikawa, to practice quality control is to develop, design, produce and
service a quality product, which ismost economical, most useful, and always
satisfactory to the consumer. To meet this goal, everyone in the company should
participate in and promote quality control, including top executives, all
divisions within the company, and all employees (Ishikawa, 1985). According
Ishikawa, TQMis not limited to the quality department but involves all
departments within the business organization and it stresses a clear customer
orientation both internal and external
(H)
7.
13
8.
DIAGRAM
14
(J)
9.
PROCEDURE
The steps in the procedure to prepare a cause-and-effect diagram are :
1. Agree on the definition of the 'Effect' for which causes are to be found.
Place the effect in the dark box at the right. Draw the spine or the
backbone as a dark line leading to the box for the effect.
2. Determine the main groups or categories of causes. Place them in boxes
and connect them through large bones to the backbone.
3. Brainstorm to find possible causes and subsidiary causes under each of the
main groups. Make sure that the route from the cause to the effect is
correctly depicted. The path must start from a root cause and end in the
effect.
4. After completing all the main groups, brainstorm for more causes that may
have escaped earlier.
15
16