Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
1996-97
42.9
40.2
1999-2000
38.4
40
32.0
2.9
3.1
2.0
2.1
2.3
1.8
1.9
1.8
1.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Pill Injectables Implants IUD Female Male
sterilization sterilization
Condom Any modem
method
Any
traditional
Any
method abortions.
method
Method Used
Male
Any traditional or sterilization: 1.9%
natural method: 5.4%
Condom: 3.1%
1068.6
2. Programmatic constraints. Major
TFR
1000
3 931.3
2.85
constraints include limited resources, lack
764.2
800
of an integrated multi-sectoral approach,
2 620.7 600
insufficient IEC support, and a weak health
management information system.
400
1
200
3. Limited awareness of reversible methods.
Awareness of reversible methods is relatively
0
1975 1985 1995 2003 2025 2050
0
limited among women and men alike.
Year Information given to clients by providers
Source: PRB, 2003 regarding contraceptive methods is typically
inadequate, most providers have any children are least likely to
a bias towards sterilization and The plan focuses receive a home visit.
only a small proportion of clients
on improving the
are informed of reversible 5. Limited access to quality
health infrastructure
methods. health services. Access to
and quality of care, quality health services is limited
4. Staff shortages and limitations. promoting inter- in both urban and rural areas. A
Staff shortages continue to sectoral coordination, substantial population residing
plague the services at all levels. and expanding the in slum areas has no access to
Where workers are available, coverage and quality family planning services owing
they are generally poorly trained of health care for to poor health infrastructure.
and have little knowledge of the vulnerable and under- Furthermore, only 37% of
methods they are promoting. rural women live in a village
served populations,
Only 13% of women report with a primary health centre
including adolescents.
receiving a home visit from or sub-centre. Important sub-
a health and family planning groups, such as adolescents
worker during the last year, and are neglected or under-served.
only 11% of those visited report receiving Contraceptive choice, and the
family planning services. Women without quality of and access to care are
limited within the programme.
Sources
1. Demographic and Health Survey, India. ORC Macro. 1992/1993; 6. “Looking Back, Looking Forward: A profile of sexual and
1998/1999 reproductive health in India.” Population Council with
2. Epidemiological Fact Sheet on HIV/AIDS and Sexually support from World Health Organization. New Delhi, 2003.
Transmitted Infections: India, 2002. UNAIDS, UNICEF & Unpublished.
WHO. 7. “India: Towards Population and Development Goals.” UNFPA,
3. India Country Health Profile, WHO/SEARO, 2003. http:// 1997
intranet/cntryhealth/india/index.htm 8. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-2) 1998-99: India.
4. India Country Profile, 2003. International Planned Parenthood NFHS-2 International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS)
Federation. http://ippfnet.ippf.org/pub/IPPF_Regions/IPPF_ and ORC Macro 2000.
CountryProfile.asp?ISOCode=IN 9. World Contraceptive Use, 2003, United Nations, Population
5. India, Population and Health. USAID/India, 2003. http://www. Division, Department of Economic and Social Affairs.
usaid.gov/in/ProgramAreas/Health.htm 10. World Population Data Sheet, 2003. Population Reference
Bureau. www.prb.org
11. World Population Policies, 2003. United Nations, Population
Division, Department of Economic and Social Affairs.
For Further Information please contact:
The Department of Family and Community Health
World Health Organization
Regional Office for South-East Asia
World Health House
Indraprastha Estate
Mahatma Gandhi Marg
New Delhi - 110002 India
Email: fch@whosea.org
www.whosea.org
http://w3.whosea.org/fch