Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
This paper provides a set of mathematical expressions to analyze the performance of loudspeaker line
arrays. It begins by developing a set of expressions for straight-line arrays including the directivity
function, polar response, quarter-power angle, on-axis and off-axis pressure response and two-dimensional
pressure field. Since in practice many loudspeaker line arrays are not actually straight, the paper then
provides expressions for curved (arc), J and progressive line arrays. In addition, since loudspeaker
systems are often not perfect sources, the paper analyzes the effects of spherical radiating sources and gaps
between sources. The paper closes with several examples of how to apply the models and compares
modeled performance to measured polar data.
INTRODUCTION
UREDA
3.1
A(l )e j[ kr (l ) + (l )]
dl
(
)
r
l
L
2
L
p=
UREDA
1
1
1
.
L
L
r ( 2) r ( 2) r
Conversely, the r(l) term in the exponential has a
significant influence on the directivity function. This is
because the relatively small distance differences to P from
any two segments are not small compared to a
wavelength, particularly at high frequency. Figure 1
shows that r(l) in the exponent can be expressed as
R( ) =
j [ kl sin + ( l )]
.
2
A(l )dl
3.2
1
RU ( ) =
L
jkl sin
dl .
p( )
R( ) =
.
pmax
The maximum radiated pressure is obtained when all
segments along the line radiate in phase, i.e. the
exponential function equals unity(4). It is given as
RU ( ) =
1 2
A(l )dl .
r L 2
sin( L sin )
.
L
sin
3.3
dl
RU ( ) =
1 2
p( ) = A(l )e j[ kl sin + (l )]dl .
r L 2
pmax =
A(l )e
r (l ) = l sin
where is the angle between a line bisecting the source
and a line from the midpoint of the source to P.
Substituting, the far field pressure at angle of a line
source is
Note that the maximum pressure at any given distance and frequency
may never actually be obtained.
.
R(0)
UREDA
RU ( ) =
sin( L sin )
.
L
sin
sin z
= 0 .5 .
z
lim
sin z
cos(0) = 1 .
z
z = 1.985 =
6 dB = 2 .
Solving for in terms of length and wavelength and
substituting we have
L
sin( ) = m
sin( ) = m
1.895
L
0
.
6
2 sin 1
L
6 dB = 2 sin 1
where m = 1, 2, 3...
Off-axis lobes of the directivity function are found inbetween the nulls, that is, at
sin( ) =
3 5 7
,
,
, ... .
2L 2L 2L
6 dB =
6 dB = 68.8
3.4
cos(m )
m + 2
1.2
L
(m + 12 )
where m = 1, 2, 3...
sin( ) =
L
Am =
L
sin .
6 dB
(degrees).
where m = 1, 2, 3...
2.4 10 4
(L in meters, f in Hz)
fL
The small angle approximation holds for angles less than about 30
degrees. Note that sin(/6) = 0.5000 and /6 = 0.5235 so that the
error is less than 5%.
UREDA
or
6 dB
7.8 10 4
(L in feet, f in Hz).
fL
3.5
pend ( x) =
A(l )e j[ krmid ( x ,l ) + (l )]
pmid ( x) =
dl
(
,
)
r
x
l
L
mid
2
L
A(l )e j[ krend ( x ,l ) + (l )]
dl
rend ( x, l )
where
2
L
rend ( x, l ) = x + l + .
2
where
rmid ( x, l ) = x 2 + l 2
The pressure response is the logarithmic ratio of the
magnitude of the pressure squared at x over the magnitude
of the pressure squared at some reference distance, i.e.
R( x) = 20 log
p ( x)
p( xref )
UREDA
3.6
p ( x, y ) =
A(l )e j[ kr ( x , y ,l ) + (l )]
dl
r ( x, y , l )
where
4.1
p A ( ) =
A( )e j [krA ( , ) + ( ) ]
Rd .
rA ( , )
1
1
1
.
rA ( 2 ) rA ( 2 ) rA
Conversely, the rA term in the exponential has a
significant influence on the directivity function. This is
because the relatively small distance differences to P from
any two segments are not small compared to a
wavelength. Figure 14 shows that rA in the exponent can
be expressed as
r ( x, y , l ) = x 2 + ( y l ) 2
Figure 13 shows the pressure field of a 4-meter
uniform straight line source, where A(l)=A and (l)=0, in
several frequency bands. The major on-axis lobe gets
narrower with increasing frequency as expected. The
minor lobes increase in number and lower amplitude
levels. At high frequency they dissolve into very complex
patterns of constructive and destructive interference.
Note that the pressure varies across the major lobe at
8kHz in a manner consistent with the pressure slices
shown in Figure 11. The undulations extend to a greater
distance from a line normal to the endpoint than from the
midpoint.
rA ( , ) = 2 R sin sin +
2 2
RA ( ) =
A( )e
j [krA ( , ) + ( ) ]
.
2
A( ) Rd
ARC SOURCES
Rd
This integral does not have a convenient closed form solution similar
to the one obtained for the line array. Wolff and Malter provide a
point source summation version of the directivity function as follows:
UREDA
RA ( ) =
1
R
p A ( x, y ) =
jkr ( , )
e A R d
p A ( x) =
A( )e j[ krA ( x , y , ) + ( )]
Rd
rA ( x, y, )
where
4.2
A( )e j[ krA ( x , ) + ( )]
Rd
rA ( x, )
J-SOURCES
where
rA ( x, ) =
(x + R(1 cos ))
5.1
+ R sin .
2
4.3
1 2
pL ( ) = AL (l )e j[ krL ( ,l ) + L (l )]dl
r L 2
where
R( ) =
rL ( , l ) = l sin( )
as shown in Section 3.1. Here, AL(l) and L(l) are the
amplitude and phase functions of the line segment. Now,
since we must rotate the arc segment by /2 relative to the
horizontal, we will also change the limits of integration.
The pressure radiated in the far field from the rotated arc
source is
n=m
1
2R
cos
cos( + n ) +
2m + 1 n = m
n=m
2R
i sin
cos( + n )
n=m
RA ( ) =
1
AA ( )e j [krA ( , ) + A ( ) ]Rd .
r 0
UREDA
where
rA ( , ) = 2R sin sin +
2
2
and AA(l) and (l) are the amplitude and phase
functions of the arc segment. To properly sum the
radiated pressure from the line and arc segments, a new
function is required to express the relative distance
difference between them. Referring to Figure 22, it is
given as
rJ ( ) =
L
sin( ) .
2
The general form for the radiated pressure in the far field
of a J-source is then
5.2
1 2
AL (l )e j[ krL ( ,l )+ L ( )] dl
r L 2
L
p J ( ) =
p J ( x) =
0
+ AA ( )e j[ krA ( ,l )+ A ( )+rJ ( )] Rd
0
RJ ( ) =
AL (l )e j[ krL ( x ,l )+ L (l )]
dl +
rL ( x, l )
AA ( )e j[ krA ( x , )+ A ( )]
Rd
rA ( x, )
where
rL ( x, l ) = x 2 + ( R sin + l ) 2
and
1
AL e jkrL ( ,l ) dl
AL L + AA R
L
2
+ AA e jk [rA ( , )+rJ ( ) ] Rd .
0
5.3
The geometric construction for the pressure field of a Jsource is shown in Figure 28. The general form for the
pressure at P is
L
p J ( x, y ) =
0
+ R
0
where
AL (l )e j[ krL ( x , y ,l ) + L ( )]
dl
rL ( x, y, l )
AA ( )e j[ krA ( x , y , ) + A ( )]
d
rA ( x, y, )
UREDA
rL ( x, y, l ) = x 2 + ( y + l ) 2
and
L =
PROGRESSIVE SOURCES
M =
L
L
6.1
1
= N (1 + N )
2
2
.
M ( M + 1)
x( ) = sin [12 ( + 1) ]L
=0
and
y ( ) = L + cos[12 ( + 1) ]L .
=0
RS ( ) =
A e
j [krS ( , ) +
=0
=0
where
L = NH
x( )
x( ) 2 + y ( ) 2
rs ( , ) = sin tan 1
y ( )
UREDA
1 M jkrS ( , )
RS ( ) =
e
M + 1 =0
where rS is given above. The polar response of a uniform
arithmetic progressive source is remarkably constant with
frequency. Figure 31 shows the polar response curves of
a 5-meter long progressive source with a terminal angle of
45.
6.2
e j[ krS ( x , ) + ]
pS ( x) = A
rS ( x, )
=0
M
spacing.
These gaps are effectively non-radiating
portions of the line and may have an effect on the
performance of the array. Also, certain radiating elements
in loudspeaker line arrays may produce radial wave fronts
instead of pure, flat wave fronts. This may also have an
effect on the performance of the array. These topics are
analyzed in the following sections.
7.1
where
NL d
rS ( x, ) = ( x x( )) + ( y ( M ) y ( )) .
2
6.3
e j[ krS ( x , y , ) + ]
pS ( x, y ) = A
rS ( x, y, )
=0
M
where
rS ( x, y, ) = ( x x( ))2 + ( y y ( ))2 .
The pressure field of a uniform progressive source in
several frequency bands is shown in Figure 35. These
results illustrate the well-behaved asymmetrical response
of a progressive source that makes them an excellent
geometry upon which to base loudspeaker arrays for
sound reinforcement applications.
ADVANCED TOPICS
R( ) =
1
A(l )e
j [ kl sin + ( l )]
( N 1) L + d
NL d
dl
.
A(l )dl
( N 1) L + d
7.2
UREDA
1
RA ( ) =
R
jkrA ( , )
R d
where
rA ( , ) = 2 R sin sin +
2 2
and R is the radius and is the included angle of the arc.
The directivity function of a stack of arc sources is
obtained by applying the first product theorem(10). In this
case, the directivity function of the arc is multiplied by
the directivity function of an array of simple sources. The
far field directivity function for an array of N simple
sources of equal amplitude and phase distributed a
distance D apart along a line is given by
RP ( ) =
1
N
j [ k ( n 1) D sin ]
n =1
RAP ( ) = RA ( ) RP ( ) .
Figure 39 shows the effects of non-flat wave fronts on
the directivity function of the sources, compared to a
perfectly flat wave front. As with gaps in a line source,
curvature primarily produces changes in the lobe/null
structure of the off-axis response. The changes increase
with increasing curvature and are more predominant when
the curvature is a material fraction of a wavelength.
Figure 39a compares the directivity function of a
uniform line source of length 3L with an array of three
curved sources of length L, where the curvature of the
arc is one-eighth wavelength. The directivity functions
are very similar, with only small differences in the
lobe/null structure. In particular, note that the nulls at
approximately 18, 35 and 60 are not as deep with the
stack of arc sources.
Figures 39b and 39c show the directivity functions of
the uniform line and the three-element array at curvatures
of and wavelengths. In these cases, lobes gradually
replace the nulls at 18, 35 and 60. At wavelength,
the lobe at 18 is approximately 10dB below the level of
the on-axis lobe, up from approximately 20dB. This
represents a practical limit to curvature that maintains,
10
The first product theorem states that the directional factor of an array
of identical sources is the product of the directional factor of the array
and the directional factor of a single element of the array. See Kinsler,
Frey, Coppens and Sanders Fundamentals of Acoustics, forth
edition, John Wiley and Sons, 1982.
11
L
tan = .66cm
2
4
f =
c
13kHz .
4
APPLICATIONS
8.1
UREDA
8.3
RU ( ) =
1
L
jkl sin
dl
e
8.2
1
RA ( ) =
R
1
N
jkr A ( , )
R d ,
and
11
rA ( , ) = 2 R sin sin +
2 2
R=
R d
rA ( , ) = 2 R sin sin + .
2 2
n =1
jkrA ( , )
and
e j[k (n 1) D sin ] ,
2
R=
1
RA ( ) =
R
where
RAP ( ) = RA ( ) RP ( ) ,
RP ( ) =
L
,
2 sin
2
The horn is 8 inches tall but the mouth is only 6.5 inches because
mounting flanges on either side of the mouth are inches wide.
12
SUMMARY
UREDA
10 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The author would like to express his appreciation to his
colleagues at JBL Professional including Mark Gander,
David Scheirman, Mark Engebretson and Doug Button.
They piqued his interest in line arrays, encouraged and
supported this body of work and were always fun to work
with.
11 REFERENCES
[1] Klepper, David and Douglas Steele, Constant
Directional Characteristics from a Line Source
Array, Presented October 15, 1962 at the 14th annual
fall convention of the Audio Engineering Society,
New York.
[2] Olson, Harry. F., Elements of Acoustical Engineering,
1st ed., p.25, D. Van Nostrand Company, Inc., New
York, 1940.
[3] Wolff, I., and Malter, L., Directional Radiation of
Sound, Jour. Acous. Soc. Amer., Vol. 2, No. 2, p.
201, 1930. The seminal work on line arrays.
[4] Beranek, Leo, Acoustics, first edition, McGraw-Hill,
1954. Author shows polar response (in dB) of line
sources (p. 96) and curved sources (p. 106).
[5] Wood, A. B., A Textbook of Sound, G. Bell and Sons,
London, 1957.
[6] Davis, A. H., Modern Acoustics, 1st ed., p. 63, The
Macmillan Company, New York, 1934.
[7] Rossi, M., Acoustics and Electroacoustics, Artech
House, Norwood, MA., 1988.
[8] Skudrzyk, E., The Foundations of Acoustics,
Springer-Verlag, New York, 1971.
[9] Lipshitz, Stanley and John Vanderkooy, The
Acoustic Radiation of Line Sources of Finite
Length, presented November, 1986 at the 81st annual
convention of the Audio Engineering Society, Los
Angeles, preprint 2417(D-4).
[10] Smith, D. L., Discrete-Element Line Arrays Their
Modeling and Optimization, J. Audio Eng. Soc.,
Vol. 45, No. 11, 1997.
[11] Heil, C., Sound Fields Radiated by Multiple Sound
Source Arrays, presented at the 92nd Convention of
the Audio Engineering Society, 1992 March, Vienna,
preprint 3269. Author discusses the response of line
arrays in the near field (Fresnel region) and the far
field (Fraunhofer region).
[12] Junger, M. and David Feit, Sound, Structures, and
their Interactions, The MIT Press, 1972.
[13] Ureda, Mark S., Line
Applications, Presented at
the Audio Engineering
Amsterdam, preprint 5304.
equation.
Arrays:
Theory and
the 110th Convention of
Society, 2001 May,
See page 6 for far field
UREDA
[14] Op. cit., Wolff, I., and Malter, L. See page 212 for a
discussion on curved line sources.
[15]Op. cit., Olson, Harry. F. See page 27 where Olson
provides the directional characteristics of 60, 90,
and 120 arc sources.
[16] Rossi, M., Acoustics and Electroacoustics, Artech
House, Norwood, MA., 1988.
See page 134
regarding curvilinear arrays.
[17] Ureda, Mark, J and Spiral Line Arrays, Presented
at the 111th Convention of the Audio Engineering
Society, 2001 December, New York, New York,
preprint 5485.
[18] IBID.
[19] Urban, Marcel, C. Heil and P. Bauman, Wavefront
Sculpture Technology, J. Audio Eng. Soc., Vol. 51,
No. 10, 2003.
[20] Button, Doug, High Frequency Components for
High Output Articulated Line Arrays, presented at
the 113th Convention of the Audio Engineering
Society, Los Angeles, October 2002.
[21]
14
Far field
Line source
l sin()
l=.5
l=4
l=
l=8
l=2
l=16
Note:
10dB per radial
increment;
30 degrees per
angular increment.
1 .10
150
135
120
105
75
60
45
dB
30
10
15
0
0
10
1m
L/
2m
4m
8m
0.1
3
1 .10
Frequency
100
1 .10
Line source
0
Transition
distance
Near field
20
rmid(x,l)
dB
6dB
100
90
pmid(x)
40
Far field
60
80
1
10
100
Distance
1 .10
1 .10
2m
500Hz
4m
2kHz
20
20
dB
8kHz
40
60
40
60
80
1
10
100
Distance (meters)
3
1 .10
80
4
1 .10
10
3
100
1 .10
Distance (meters)
1 .10
Line source
0
Midpoint
20
l
dB
dB
8m
rend (x,l)
Endpoint
40
60
80
1
pend(x)
10
100
1 .10
Distance (meters)
1 .10
0 (midpoint)
20
L/2
dB
L
40
3L/2
60
80
1
10
100
Distance
1 .10
4
1 .10
Line source
l
r (x,y,l)
p (x,y)
meters
meters
250Hz
meters
2kHz
meters
8kHz
meters
meters
1kHz
meters
meters
plot
meters
plot
4kHz
plot
meters
plot
meters
plot
500Hz
meters
Far field
rA(,)
R=.5
R =
R =2
R =4
R =8
R =16
Note:
10dB per radial
increment;
30 degrees per
angular increment.
Line
20
dB
pA (x)
rA(x)
Arc
40
x
60
1
10
100
1 .10
Distance
Figure 17: On-axis pressure response of an
arc source and a straight line source at 4kHz.
The arc source has an included angle of 45
and a radius of 4m. The line source has a
length equal to the arc length (3.14m).
20
20
15
2kHz
dB
30
dB
60
4kHz
8kHz
40
40
60
60
1
10
100
3
1 .10
Distance
Figure 18: On-axis pressure response of
three arc sources ( = 15, 30 and 60) at
8kHz where R=4m. These correspond to arc
lengths of approximately 1, 2, and 4 meters.
The 30 and 60 curves are offset by 10 and 20
dB respectively.
10
100
1 .10
Distance
Figure 19: On-axis pressure response of an
arc source at various frequencies where =
30 and R= 4m. The arc length is
approximately 2m. The 2kHz and 8kHz curves
are offset by 10 and 20 dB respectively.
pA(x,y)
meters
meters
250Hz
meters
2kHz
meters
8kHz
meters
meters
1kHz
meters
meters
plot
meters
plot
4kHz
plot
meters
plot
meters
plot
500Hz
meters
Figure 21: Pressure fields plot
of a uniform arc source.
y
Far field
Line Source
Arc Source
J-Source
rA(,)
rJ()
Note:
10dB per radial
increment;
30 degrees per
angular increment.
500
630
800
1000
1250
1600
2000
2500
3150
Note:
10dB per radial
increment;
30 degrees per
angular increment.
500
630
800
1000
1250
1600
2000
2500
3150
Note:
10dB per radial
increment;
30 degrees per
angular increment.
Line
20
J source
dB
J-source
40
60
rJ(x,,l)
80
1
10
3
100
1 .10
Distance (meters)
Figure 27: Comparison at 2kHz of the onaxis pressure response of a 4 meter long
straight line source and a J-source where
L=2m, R=2m, =60, AL=1 and AA = 1.
J source
1 .10
pJ(x,y)
meters
meters
250Hz
meters
2kHz
meters
8kHz
meters
meters
1kHz
meters
meters
plot
meters
plot
4kHz
plot
meters
plot
meters
plot
500Hz
meters
x
Far field
x(), y()
rS (,)
400
500
630
800
1000
1250
1600
2000
2500
3150
4000
5000
Note:
10dB per radial
increment;
30 degrees per
angular increment.
Spiral source
20
dB
L
x(), y()
40
rS(x, )
60
1
10
L
rS(x,)
1 .10
1 .10
Spiral source
x(), y()
100
Distance (meters)
p(x,)
meters
meters
250Hz
meters
meters
2kHz
meters
8kHz
meters
meters
plot
meters
plot
500Hz
1kHz
meters
meters
plot
meters
plot
4kHz
plot
meters
Stack of four
line sources
with gaps.
The radiating
ratio of a
single source
is (L-2d)/L.
L=
10
0
50%
10
75%
20
dB
90%
30
40
50
60
100%
70
80
90
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Degrees off-axis
L=2
10
0
10
20
dB
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Degrees off-axis
L=4
10
0
10
20
dB
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Degrees off-axis
90
= /8
_____ Straight-line
.. Stack of arcs
10
20
dB
30
40
50
60
70
80
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Off-axis angle
= /4
_____ Straight-line
.. Stack of arcs
10
20
dB
30
40
50
60
70
80
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Off-axis angle
0
= /2
_____ Straight-line
.. Stack of arcs
10
20
dB
30
40
50
60
70
80
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Off-axis angle
1.25k
1.6k
2k
2.5k
3.15k
4k
5k
6.3k
8k
10k
12.5k
16k
Note:
10dB per radial
increment;
30 degrees per
angular increment.
Figure 40: Polar response curves of a stack of three 15cm high, 20 arc
sources (dotted line) superimposed over the response of a 45cm straight line
source (solid line).
500
1k
630
1.25k
800
1.6k
Note:
10dB per radial
increment;
30 degrees per
angular increment.
Figure 42: Measured (dots) versus modeled (solid line) polar response
curves of the array in Figure 41. Model based on uniform straight line source
and a sine wave input. Measured data is 1/3 octave pink noise.
400
500
630
800
1k
1.25k
1.6k
2k
2.5k
3.15k
4k
5k
Figure 43: Measured (dots) versus modeled (solid line) polar response
curves of the array in Figure 41. Model based on a stack of arc sources with
a sine wave input. Measured data is 1/3 octave pink noise.
Note:
10dB per radial
increment;
30 degrees per
angular increment.
100
125
160
200
250
315
400
500
630
800
1k
1.25k
1.6k
2k
2.5k
3.15k
4k
5k
6.3k
8k
Note:
10dB per radial
increment;
30 degrees per
angular increment.