1

Mr Brendan Facey, Sheriff of Victoria

Cc:

10

23-12-2015

Michelle Ainsworth michelle.ainsworth@news.com.au

Victorian Electoral Commissioner Email: complaints@vec.vic.gov.au
Daniel Andrews Premier Victoria daniel.andrews@parliament.vic.gov.au
Mr Martin Pakula, martin.pakula@parliament.vic.gov.au & attorney-general@justice.vic.gov.au
Civic Compliance Victoria GPO Box 1916, Melbourne VIC 3001 Traffic_Inquiries@tenixsolutions.com
Mr Peter Lauritsen Chief Magistrate, Magistrates Court of Victoria C/o help@magistratescourt.vic.gov.au

Case 1564277756-Ob-1537134040
Ref; 20151223-G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Brendan Facey-Sheriff of Victoria & others-Re purported warrant issue-etc

15

Sir,
Let me make it very clear to you that so to say you scared the living daylights out of my 83
year old wife when she read your 18-12-2015 correspondence, which also stated:

20

Moment, this is an alleged infringement as to FAILING TO VOTE and you seem to be out of
your mind to claim you can suspend my driver license or vehicle registration for this? I
understand that you were in charge in the Liquor Licensing Department some years ago, but
surely the liquor itself didnt cause you to become brain dead?

25

I make it very clear I oppose the validity of the alleged WARRANT issue and
direct/request/instruct you to return the purported WARRANT to the Infringement Court, that if
you can actually find one to existing!

30

35

40

ANTHONY FERNANDO v PORT PHILLIP CITY COUNCIL AND OTHERS 2330 of 2011
QUOTE at 52
The Attorney-General also made the following remarks about the power of magistrates:
The bill gives broader options to magistrates in open court hearings which occur after the
execution of an enforcement warrant. By this stage, other enforcement sanctions, instalment
payment plans or community work will not have been successful in expiating the fines. These
hearings will consider whether a person should be imprisoned, and will determine whether the
individual has extenuating circumstances.
END QUOTE

Well there is obviously an issue that as I all along OBJECTED TO THE JURISDICTION of
any court then unless and until a Court had disposed of this objection (not that I seek to imply it
can and/or will do so) No court order of a so called Infringement court can be valid let alone a
enforcement order and/or WARRANT issue.
p1
23-12-2015
Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI series by E-mail INSPECTORRIKATI@schorel-hlavka.com See also www.schorel-hlavka.com at blog Http://www.scribd.com/InspectorRikati

2
It means that if you or for that anyone else would seek to enforce the WARRANT against my
person you would place yourself outside the Rule of Law and be personally liable for any legal
consequences.
CRUDEN v. NEALE 2 NC 338 Chief Justice Paul de Jersey AC [1796]

http://www.publicnoticeposted.com/cruden.htm
QUOTE
"When we speak of the law, we contemplate the legislature which enacts it, the police service which
enforces it at least on the criminal side, and the courts of law which ensure the delivery of justice according
to law.

10

It must be remembered that the charter of the courts is not to do justice, but to do justice according to law.
Subjective notions of justice vary immensely from person to person. The legal system would be unworkably
uncertain and unpredictable if judges applied their idiosyncratic notions of what is just. Accordingly, judges
and police officers, are constrained by the law enacted by the peoples elected representatives in the
Parliament.

15

The stipulation is for equal justice, of which the probably best-known symbol of the Supreme Court is the
statue of Themis standing with dignity before the courthouse in George Street. She is quite regularly
displayed in television coverage of legal proceedings. That regular air time probably increases her notoriety,
but more fundamentally, it reflects her enduring iconic status an ancient goddess whose influential message
still defines modern civil society."

20

END QUOTE
https://law.resource.org/pub/us/case/reporter/F.Cas/0003.f.cas/0003.f.cas.0221.pdf
BENNETT V. BOGGS.

QUOTE
25

30

35

40

45

50

We cannot declare legislative act void because it conflicts with our opinions of policy, expediency or
justice. We are not the guardians of the rights of the people of a state unless they are secured by some
constitutional provision which comes within our judicial cognizance. The remedy for unwise or
oppressive legislation, within constitutional bounds, is by an appeal to the justice and patriotism of the
representatives of the people. If this fails, the people in their sovereign capacity can correct the evil; but
courts cannot assume their rights.
END QUOTE

My view is that the corruption of the legal system is that politicians and officials are misusing
and abusing the legal processes well aware that no matter what harm they inflict upon a citizen
they usually are getting away with it. Well I got news for you! I am determine to continue my
crusade for my constitutional and other legal rights and guess what? On 19 July 2006 I
comprehensively defeated the Commonwealth of Australia and so Stater Attorney-Generals in
my appeals regarding 2 convictions of FAILING TO VOTE in the County Court of Victoria!
It was a 5 year protracted litigation which in the end I succeeded in, and how!
The then Victorian Attorney General Mr Rob Hulls placed in writing that the State of Victoria
would abide by the Courts decision.
So what the hell is the Victorian Electoral Commission on about in violation of the undertaking
and in violation of the courts determination to litigate against me?
If you are really an OFFICER OF THE COURT then you should arrest the real law breakers
being the Victorian electoral commission and others for violating my rights obtained with the 19
July 2006. After all an Infringement Registrar cannot overrule the County Court of Victoria and
is bound by this decision. As I understand it that violating court orders and/or to undermine the
rights of as party of obtained court orders may be deemed CONTEMPT OF COURT, and surely
you wouldnt want to be part of the same as it could perhaps cause you to lose your job. Who
can trust a Sheriff if he acts in violation to court orders?
My wife reading the 18 December 2015 correspondence was very upset that I might not come
home but being arrested. Shame on you for this utter and sheer nonsense.
p2
23-12-2015
Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI series by E-mail INSPECTORRIKATI@schorel-hlavka.com See also www.schorel-hlavka.com at blog Http://www.scribd.com/InspectorRikati

10

15

3
If you fail to return this purported WARRANT issue and you or someone else were to act upon it
then your neck so to say is on the line for the legal consequences that could flow from this.
If anyone was to act against me and as a direct/indirect result my wife would be harmed in
anyway then you could find your ass on the line to be suede , this as you should be aware you
are to do your job appropriately and not act some common terrorist to extort monies from
innocent people.
I did a 5 year legal court battle, and succeeded and entitled therefore to the benefits of the courts
finding and orders. If someone didnt like it then that is their bad luck as it is well past any
appeals time to address the same issues and the High Court of Australia (HCA 27 of 1999
Wakim) made clear that the same parties cannot re-litigate the same constitutional issues that
previously were litigated between them. As the VEC acts for and on behalf of the State
government then it is clearly prohibited to re-litigate the same issues of constitutional matters
that were litigated before the County court of Victoria on 19 July 2006 and to which the State of
Victoria didnt seek to challenge my numerous submissions on constitutional grounds nor
pursued then any appeal.

As there was an s78B NOTICE OF CONSTITUTIONALMATTERS served upon all

Attorney-Generals it is clear that it involved constitutional issues.
20

When parties are involved in litigation they make at times decisions which afterwards they may
not be pleased with but in the end the State of Victoria and so the Victorian Electoral
Commission are bound by it.

p3
23-12-2015
Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI series by E-mail INSPECTORRIKATI@schorel-hlavka.com See also www.schorel-hlavka.com at blog Http://www.scribd.com/InspectorRikati

The confirmation email from the court is reproduced below that it did receive my 6-12-2015
correspondence (quoted below also) via email
5

QUOTE 6-12-2015 CORRESPONDENCE

Re: see attachment 20151206-G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to
Infringement Court & VEC & others-Re COMPLAINT-Electoral
matters& judicial issues-etc-Supplement-01
From

help@magistratescourt.vic.gov.au

p4
23-12-2015
Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI series by E-mail INSPECTORRIKATI@schorel-hlavka.com See also www.schorel-hlavka.com at blog Http://www.scribd.com/InspectorRikati

5
Sender

Renee.Lemmon@magistratescourt.vic.gov.au

To

admin@inspector-rikati.com

Date

Today 09:39 (7-12-2015)

Hi Mr Schorel-Hlavka,

Your recent emails to the Help email address of the Magistrates' Court have been forwarded to the Chief
Magistrate for consideration.
Regards
Renee

10
"Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B."
<admin@inspector-rikati.com>

To help@magistratescourt.vic.gov.au,
ccadmin@inspector-rikati.com, michelle.ainsworth@news.com.au,
complaints@vec.vic.gov.au, daniel.andrews@parliament.vic.gov.au,
martin.pakula@parliament.vic.gov.au, attorney-general@justice.vic.gov.au,
Traffic_Inquiries@tenixsolutions.com
Subjectsee attachment 20151206-G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Infringement
Court & VEC & others-Re COMPLAINT-Electoral matters& judicial issuesetc-Supplement-01

06/12/2015 09:50 PM
Please respond to
admin@inspector-rikati.com

Mr Peter Lauritsen Chief Magistrate, Magistrates Court of Victoria

6-12-2015

Ground Floor, 277 William Street

Melbourne Vic 3000
15

C/o help@magistratescourt.vic.gov.au
Cc:

Michelle Ainsworth michelle.ainsworth@news.com.au

Victorian Electoral Commissioner Email: complaints@vec.vic.gov.au

Daniel Andrews Premier Victoria daniel.andrews@parliament.vic.gov.au

Mr Martin Pakula, martin.pakula@parliament.vic.gov.au& attorney-general@justice.vic.gov.au

20

Civic Compliance Victoria GPO Box 1916, Melbourne VIC 3001

Traffic_Inquiries@tenixsolutions.com

Case 1564277756-Ob-1537134040
25

Ref; 20151206-G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Infringement Court & VEC & othersCase 1564277756-Ob-1537134040 Re COMPLAINT-Electoral & judicial issues-etcSupplement-01
Sir,

30

see attachment 20151206-G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Infringement

Court & VEC & others-Re COMPLAINT-Electoral matters& judicial issues-etcSupplement-01
p5
23-12-2015
Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI series by E-mail INSPECTORRIKATI@schorel-hlavka.com See also www.schorel-hlavka.com at blog Http://www.scribd.com/InspectorRikati

-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL
107 Graham Road
Viewbank 3084, Victoria, Australia
Author of INSPECTOR-RIKATI books on certain constitutional and other legal issues.

10

15

20

THE MORAL OF A SOCIETY CAN BE MEASURED BY HOW IT PROVIDES FOR THE DISABLED
[attachment "20151206-G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Infringement Court & VEC & others-Re COMPLAINTElectoral matters& judicial issues-etc-Supplement-01.pdf" deleted by Renee Lemmon/Person/DOJ]
PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL
The content of this e-mail and any attachments may be private and confidential, intended only for use of the
individual or entity named. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you must not read, forward,
print, copy, disclose, use or store in any way the information this e-mail or any attachment contains.
If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete or destroy all copies of
this e-mail and any attachments.
Our organisation respects the privacy of individuals. For a copy of our privacy policy please go to our website
or contact us.

END QUOTE 6-12-2015 CORRESPONDENCE

25

Again
QUOTE
Hi Mr Schorel-Hlavka,
Your recent emails to the Help email address of the Magistrates' Court have been forwarded to the
Chief Magistrate for consideration.

30

35

Regards
Renee
END QUOTE
QUOTE 6-12-2015 CORRESPONDENCE

Mr Peter Lauritsen Chief Magistrate, Magistrates Court of Victoria

Ground Floor, 277 William Street
Melbourne Vic 3000
40

6-12-2015

C/o help@magistratescourt.vic.gov.au
Cc:

Michelle Ainsworth michelle.ainsworth@news.com.au

Victorian Electoral Commissioner Email: complaints@vec.vic.gov.au
Daniel Andrews Premier Victoria daniel.andrews@parliament.vic.gov.au
Mr Martin Pakula, martin.pakula@parliament.vic.gov.au & attorney-general@justice.vic.gov.au
Civic Compliance Victoria GPO Box 1916, Melbourne VIC 3001 Traffic_Inquiries@tenixsolutions.com

45

Case 1564277756-Ob-1537134040
Ref; 20151206-G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Infringement Court & VEC & othersCase 1564277756-Ob-1537134040 Re COMPLAINT-Electoral & judicial issues-etc-Supplement-01

50

Sir,
Obviously the statement We all think the ship's
necessarily if at all reflect the truth of matters.
55

in safe hands.

Is from another lawyer and not

http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/states-new-chief-magistrate-named-20121128-2aefd.html
State's new chief magistrate named, Date November 29, 2012
QUOTE

Perhaps his best endorsement came from a colleague who commented: ''We all think the ship's in safe hands.''
END QUOTE

p6
23-12-2015
Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI series by E-mail INSPECTORRIKATI@schorel-hlavka.com See also www.schorel-hlavka.com at blog Http://www.scribd.com/InspectorRikati

10

7
In my 4-12-2015 correspondence (incorrectly referring to Grey) I exposed a lot of short coming
in the legal processes and conduct in the Magistrates Court of Victoria regarding Intervention
orders, and I am also currently involved in an appeal (unrelated matter) where the absurdity of
the legal processes are even more ramped in the Magistrates Court of Victoria. Where a Judicial
registrar without any brief filed and without evidence during the court hearing somehow still
make orders against the accused, disregarding written submissions for OBJECTION TO
JURISDICTION.
The NOTICE OF INTENTION TO ISSUE AN INFRINGMENT WARRANT also shows on
the reverse side:
QUOTE

If you do not pay the fine, or any instalments under a payment order, an infringement
warrant will be issued against you.
END QUOTE

15

20

As such it appears that no matter what the warrant issue has been predetermined no matter what!
This, I view makes any subsequently order to be null and void!
Yet, contrary to this the face of the NOTICE shows:

As such while this part states TO AVOID THE ISSUING OF AN INFRINGMENT

WARRANT YOU MUST DO ONE OF THE FOLLOWING again the flip/reverse/back side
shows:
QUOTE

If you do not pay the fine, or any instalments under a payment order, an infringement
warrant will be issued against you.
END QUOTE

25

A further problem is that in the statement TO AVOID THE ISSUING OF AN

INFRINGMENT WARRANT YOU MUST DO ONE OF THE FOLLOWING
It is time some competent person check s Wakim HCA 27 of 1999 such as

30

Re Wakim; Ex parte McNally; Re Wakim; Ex parte Darvall; Re Brown; Ex parte Amann; Spi [1999] HCA 27
(17 June 1999)
QUOTE

35

For constitutional purposes, they are a nullity. No doctrine of res judicata or issue estoppel can prevail
against the Constitution. Mr Gould is entitled to disregard the orders made in Gould v Brown. No doubt, as
Latham CJ said of invalid legislation, "he will feel safer if he has a decision of a court in his favour".
That is because those relying on the earlier decision may seek to enforce it against Mr Gould.
END QUOTE

40

Lets make it very clear, that the notice claims (as reproduced above in part) that within s167 of
the Infringement Act 2006 it is an offence to provide false or misleading information. As such
the VEC concealing my OBJECTION TO JURISDICTION as well as that the then AttorneyGeneral Mr Rob Hulls for the State of Victoria made clear to abide by the courts decision of the
County Court of Victoria to uphold both appeals against conviction for FAILING TO VOTE
then why is it that you cannot manage to conduct proceedings as was assumed ''We all think the
ship's in safe hands.''?

45

Lets also be clear about it that the orders were issued without jurisdiction and are a nullity and
I do not need to request anything such as for a review of the court orders as
legally/constitutionally they do not exist!
p7
23-12-2015
Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI series by E-mail INSPECTORRIKATI@schorel-hlavka.com See also www.schorel-hlavka.com at blog Http://www.scribd.com/InspectorRikati

10

8
As such, contrary to the 20-10-2015 correspondence that I can request for a re-hearing there is
no need to do so because where the Infringement Court Registrar failed to invoke jurisdiction in
the first place then there can be no hearing De Novo because the case itself never could have
been heard unless the Infringement Court Registrar had dismissed the OBJECTION TO
JURISDICTION by issuing orders and a reason of judgment doing so. Yet, I am not aware such
jurisdictional hearing ever eventuated. As I did set out in previous writings the magistrates
Court of Victoria/Infringement Court Registrar has no judicial powers to interfere or otherwise
undermine the rights and benefits I obtained by the successful appeals and so the orders of the
County Court of Victoria held on 19-6-2006. If you cannot even understand/comprehend this
then perhaps you may consider a job as a fish and chips salesman?
.

This document is not intended and neither must be perceived to refer to all
details/issues.
15

MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL

Our name is our motto!)

(
Awaiting your response,

G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O. W. B.

(Friends call me Gerrit)

END QUOTE 6-12-2015 CORRESPONDENCE

20
Well now this rot!

p8
23-12-2015
Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI series by E-mail INSPECTORRIKATI@schorel-hlavka.com See also www.schorel-hlavka.com at blog Http://www.scribd.com/InspectorRikati

10

15

9
I do not intend in this correspondence (but may do so in any supplement) to set out all kinds of
Authorities but safe to say that it is not relevant what the purported Infringement Court issued as
orders/WARRANT because if it is and remains ULTRA VIRES Ab Initio then any ignorance by
you or for that anyone else will not somehow validate what is unconstitutional. Despite my
persistent OBJECTION TO JURISDICTION and the challenging the validity of the
Infringement Act 2006 no court has so far ruled against me on this issue! As such not only I am
entitled to the benefits of this but so anyone else.
Just imagine if finally some court were to deal with the matter and then find that indeed I was all
along wright and the Infringement Act 2006 is and remains to be ULTRA\ VIRES (Do not forget
the High Court of Australia did so in 1999 with the purported Cross Vesting Act!) then you may
just find to be personally subjected to a class action by all those who were harmed by you and
those acting on your behalf where you should have been aware that enforcement of any
orders/warrant subjected to having been challenged that the Infringement Court was
unconstitutional also then you may find that any legal redress by your victims may succeed. You
cannot then argue that you acted as a Sheriff, because you are not when you are made aware that
the Infringement Act 2006 is subjected to a challenge and you didnt bother to have this clarified
in a competent court of law!

20

Again as I stated above: I make it very clear I oppose the validity of the alleged WARRANT
issue and direct/request/instruct you to return the purported WARRANT to the
Infringement Court, that if you can actually find one to existing!

25

The question is if you are a real competent Sheriff who is more concerned upholding the integrity
of the court then to be some so to say puppet on a string for the government, willing so to say to
sell his soul for some pennies. In the meantime I urge you to write a letter of apology so my wife
may be less worried that if she is in the car and I am arrested that she will not perhaps suffer a
heart attack because of this utter unlawful conduct of yours.

30

Again, I most likely will write a supplement to this correspondence, albeit the above stated in
itself should be sufficient to understand that the (purported) Warrant Issue has no legal force and
cannot be relied upon

35

This document is not intended and neither must be perceived to refer to all
details/issues.

MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL

Our name is our motto!)

(
Awaiting your response,

G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O. W. B.

(Friends call me Gerrit)

p9
23-12-2015
Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI series by E-mail INSPECTORRIKATI@schorel-hlavka.com See also www.schorel-hlavka.com at blog Http://www.scribd.com/InspectorRikati