Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
1.
Title.....................................................................................................................................................3
2.
Introduction.........................................................................................................................................3
2.1
OGDCL.......................................................................................................................................3
2.2
Mission........................................................................................................................................3
2.3
Vision...........................................................................................................................................3
2.4
Fields...........................................................................................................................................3
2.5
Hierarchy.....................................................................................................................................6
2.6
Employees of OGDCL.................................................................................................................7
2.7
Job satisfaction............................................................................................................................8
2.8
2.9
3.
Methodology......................................................................................................................................10
4.
Analysis.............................................................................................................................................10
5.
Appendix...........................................................................................................................................13
6.
References.........................................................................................................................................14
1.
Title
Impact of rewards job satisfaction
2. Introduction
2.1 OGDCL
Oil and gas Development Company limited commonly known as OGDCL is Pakistani Oil and
Gas Company. It is listed on 3 stock exchanges of Pakistan as well as on London stock exchange.
OGDCL have its many fields of oil and gas in all over Pakistan. It was founded in April 1961.
Headquarter of OGDCL is located in Blue area, Islamabad. Mr. Zahid Muzaffar is chairman of
OGDCL. There are 11,000 employees working in OGDCL and its fields of oil and gas located in
4 provinces of Pakistan. . OGDCL supply more than 60% of the oil produced in the country.
2.2 Mission
To become the leading provider of oil and gas to the country by increasing exploration and
production both domestically and internationally, utilizing all options including strategic
alliances.
To continuously realign ourselves to meet the expectations of our stakeholders through best
management practices, the use of latest technology, and innovation for sustainable growth, while
being socially responsible.
2.3 Vision
To be a leading multinational Exploration and Production Company.
2.4 Fields
In total OGDC have 34 fields in Punjab, Sindh, KPK and Baluchistan.
Sindh Fields
Tando Alam
Lashari
Thora
Sono
Missan
Pasakhi
Bobi
Qadirpur
Kunnar/Kunnar Pasakhi Deep
Oil field
Oil field
Oil field
Oil field
Oil field
Oil field
Gas Field
Gas Field
Gas Field
Norai Jagir
Daru
Hundi/Sari
Sinjhoro
Nur
Bagla
Maru-Reti
Sari
Gas Field
Gas Field
Gas Field
Gas Field
Gas Field
Gas Field
Gas Field
Gas Field
Punjab Fields
Fimkassar
Messa Keswal
Toot
Chak Naurang
Kal
Rajian
Bahu
Nandpur/Panjpir
Dakhni
Dhodak
Sadqal
Oil field
Oil field
Oil field
Oil field
Oil field
Oil field
Gas Field
Gas Field
Gas Field
Gas Field
Gas Field
KPK Fields
Chanda
Mela
Nashpa
Oil field
Oil field
Oil field
Baluchistan Fields
Loti
Uch
Pirkoh
Gas Field
Gas Field
Gas Field
2.5 Hierarchy
Some of the employees are satisfied by these rewards but some are still not satisfied by these
rewards. There are 2 types of rewards for an employee; Extrinsic and intrinsic reward. Here the
question arises that is there any relationship exist between intrinsic reward and job satisfaction if
so, then to see intrinsic reward importance in eyes of OGDCL employees.
satisfaction comes with the job experience when individual had a grip on this task and working
he start enjoying his job and task by which he is appraised for his work (Locke, 1976).it is about
the feelings of the workers that are performing their task that what they feel about their task are
they happily performing their job and the task assigned to them. It is persons personal feeling of
satisfaction or dissatisfaction about the task or in other words his likeness or unlikeness (Spector,
1997).if the organization is maintaining satisfied employees then its turnover rate will also be
minimized and provide with the loyal human resource to the organization. As it is a common
nature of human whenever he feels dissatisfaction he starts avoiding that environment and seeks
for the alternatives. It is negative sign for the organization that it is not capable of keeping
satisfied employees. High satisfaction will provide high commitment of the employees for his
task and he will always be sensitive about the reputation of his organization (Sarwar and Abugre,
2013). Job satisfaction could be examined by the individuals behavior and attitude during
workplace (Hulin and Judge, 2003).
According to an assessment job satisfaction is an attitude of an individual working in an
organization. Attitude is developed by what individual feels thought and what are his/her
emotions about the working environment (Celik, 2011). By this ways employees preference
could be easily identified during job projects. Human resource is an most precious asset of every
organization and it is an entire responsibility of every manger having satisfied subordinates and it
could only be possible how the manger is controlling the situations how he is executing this
plans how he is delegating authorities to subordinates. Mangers positive attitude is a key for
having highly motivated and committed subordinates. It is not about having satisfied employees
by only having a smooth working it is closely bonded with the rewards and appraisals. Now here
managers decision comes into play that how to reward his subordinates during different projects
completion. He should understand the psyche of his employees weather they rewarded by
extrinsic or intrinsic rewards can do the job. (Lu et al, 2005). Behavior and attitude of employees
reflects the efficiency of the plan execution. So managers had to have a deep eye on his
subordinate to ensure their satisfaction and commitment to their tasks and they must be working
for the mutual benefit for theirs and for the organizational objectives (Senyucel 2009).
Every individual had different problems in his life. Same is the case with the satisfaction every
employee had different satisfaction parameters. It is the responsibility of mangers to fulfill those
parameters to maximum level they can (Patterson. 2010). It is feeling of measurement of his task
by his rewards for every employee. Employee always measures the task with the rewards and
benefits attached with it. So it is to ensure that they must be comparable. (Locke, 1969).
( Kalleberg ); he highlighted relationship between work value and rewards attached with it which
raises or decreases employees satisfaction level.
Importance of employees satisfaction carries prominent place in every organizations. Many of
the researchers and psychologists and other theorist time by time are highlighting the importance
of satisfaction.
So above discussion along with references of different researchers who had conducted same
research and their findings and study leads to a discussion that extrinsic nature rewards are
highly satisfier of employees working in an organizations.
H2: Extrinsic rewards have positive impact on job satisfaction
3. Methodology
We have conducted a descriptive study in OGDCL to see impact of rewards specifically intrinsic
rewards on job satisfaction of employees. We have also studied and analyzed some of the articles
related to job satisfaction, intrinsic rewards and extrinsic rewards. We have selected 20
employees from HR department through random sampling and we used questionnaire for data
collection and for the analysis we have used SPSS.
4. Analysis
Correlations
Intrinsic rewards
Avg
Intrinsic rewards
Avg
Pearson
Correlation
Sig. (2tailed)
N
Extrinsic rewards
Avg
Extrinsic rewards
Avg
20
Pearson
Correlation
.317*
Sig. (2tailed)
N
.025
20
20
Model Summaryb
Model
1
R
.415a
R
Square
.172
Adjusted
R
Square
.155
Std.
Error of
the
Estimate
.78164
DurbinWatson
1.541
Model
2
R
.558a
Adjusted
R
Square
.297
R
Square
.312
Std.
Error of
the
Estimate
.71257
DurbinWatson
1.608
Model 1: R shows that extrinsic rewards and employees job satisfaction are 41.5% related with
one another. R square shows that extrinsic rewards have 17.2% impact on employees job
satisfaction
Model 2: R shows that intrinsic rewards and employees job satisfaction are 55.8% related with
one another. R square shows that intrinsic rewards have 31.2 % impact on employees job
satisfaction
ANOVAb
Model
1
Regression
Model
2
Sum of
Squares
6.085
Mean
Square
6.085
.611
df
Residual
29.326
48
Total
35.411
49
Regression
Sum of
Squares
11.039
Mean
Square
11.039
.508
df
Residual
24.373
48
Total
35.411
49
F
9.959
Sig.
.003a
F
21.740
Sig.
.000a
ANOVA tells us the fitness of the model. In ANOVAs if F is greater than 5.96 with sig. of 0.05 or
less then the model is a strong fit.
Model 1: The value of F is 9.959 (greater than 5.96) with a significance of 0.003 (less than 0.05).
This shows that our model 1 is strong fit and our model 1 is accepted.
Model 2: In model 2 the value of F is 21.740 (greater than 5.96) with a significance of 0.000
(less than 0.05). This shows that our model 2 is a strong fit and our model 2 is accepted.
Coefficients
Model
1 (Constant)
Intrinsic
rewards Avg
Model
1
(Constant)
Extrinsic
rewards Avg
Unstandardized
Coefficients
Std.
B
Error
.904
.926
.821
.260
Unstandardized
Coefficients
Std.
B
Error
1.103
.588
.709
.152
Standardized
Coefficients
Beta
.415
Co linearity Statistics
t
.977
Sig.
.333
3.156
.003
Standardize
d
Coefficients
Beta
.558
Tolerance
1.000
VIF
1.000
Co linearity
Statistics
t
1.875
Sig.
.067
Tolerance
4.663
.000
1.000
VIF
1.000
Model 1: Beta indicates that 1 unit change in intrinsic rewards bring 0.415 unit change in
employees job satisfaction. Value of t is 3.156 (greater than 1.96) with a significance of 0.003
(less than 0.05) indicates that our hypothesis 1 is accepted i.e. intrinsic rewards have positive
impact on employees job satisfaction.
Model 2: Beta of model 2 indicates that 1 unit change in extrinsic rewards brings 0.558 unit
change in employees job satisfaction. Value of t is 4.663 (greater than 1.96) with a
significance of 0.000 (less than 0.05) indicates that our hypothesis 2 is accepted i.e. extrinsic
rewards have positive impact on employees job satisfaction.
5. Appendix
6. References