Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Everyomr on ISs, or any other space travel up until now knows its fake. When vi
rtual reality simulation is good enough the selected people will not know its fa
ke.
Almost everyone building the "space ships" and working on the ground level beli
eve it is all real. This is why people say, "if we had thousands of people putti
ng in many many hours of work to this project building it we know the rocket is
real".
It is easy to fool these people because they see about as much as the media sho
ws the world. The " control instruments" for ground control are simulators.
The question is, why would they create such an elaborate lie?
What is really up in the sky?
If they ever send civilians to mars in mass transit, you can bet it will be to
their death and demise.
Have you ever sat in the middle of a field in the middle of no where and looked
straight up at the milky way? Are you saying that the countless stars you can se
e with your naked eye (Yes I know some are clusters! Im just sayin!) are fake?
Two ways it could be done:
1. Dome: The only way to project this "fake" star light for all to see would be
a Dome, which would...lets face it... be impossible. Size, cost and man power t
o make it, nope. Everyone would know it was fake.
2. Mass hallucination: Nope, would need to drug people all over the world at di
fferent times from time in memorial
Stars are just that, they are stars. Between a few hundred and a few billion (t
hats BILLION) light years away. Giant balls of gas dancing their cosmic dance be
fore they die. I have viewed Mars through a powerful telescope and saw the Majes
ty of the red (green sometimes) planet.
You will never go to space, that is a sad fact. I will never go. It costs too m
uch to send 3 people up so why would they just pick any tom dick and harry.
Now, I have a question for you OP. I myself have been lucky to witness 3 shuttl
e launches. I have seen the rockets dislodge and fall to the earth as the shuttl
e itself fly into the great dark. If its all fake then where the hell does it go
? Its not like a plane as it ... and wait for it ... as it will blow your mind .
.. goes straight up (ok yes, at a very slight angle).
So... Is someone turning out the light at night with some kind of switch? When t
here is an eclipse, are they then switching the light off and on like some kind
of sick peek a boo game?
There are just so many questions that would need to be answered vastly differen
tly if what you are saying is true. And since you seem to think it is, can you a
nswer the above questions?
I'm all for a good conspiracy, but I like for it to be sort of a little feasibl
e before I start placing any kind of stock into it.
a reply to: thekaboose
it goes out of sight into the distance, at a HUGE angle, then falls into the se
a. they had several shuttles to fake a "re-entry landing"
i watched the final shuttle launch live, and when i saw the angle it was going
into the sky i was not impressed. i was impressed by the shuttle itself, that wa
s back when i still believed in it all.
you can see mars, the rings of saturn, jupiter, and several moons.
can you see to the surface of any of these stars? no.
just because they have shown you "true images" of the surface of mars, you imag
ine it when you look at it in the telescope. this is the sorcory.
for them to be like earth they must have a surface. and as these are wandering
stars they are masters of deception.
they can appear as they wish to appear. the ancients believed they were gods. t
he modern humans believe they are like the earth in function. but they are not.
neither are they like the sun.
edit--it is the wandering stars themselves ("the planets") that are deceiving the nas
a deceivers.
these days humans must be deceived to worship something.
in ancient times they straight up worshipped them for what they were
The Sun is a star (and a newspaper), you speak of how they are closer etc but yo
u have not given your math to prove it. All I see is someone trying to peddle fa
lse information on the forum once again. You complain about CGI but as someone p
ointed out... there were times before Photoshop and we have pictures of space fr
om them (First one I know of was 1946 from a cam strapped to a V-2).
I am sorry, but honestly I believe that your views are based upon the fact that
you were disappointed with the fact you would never go into space (which is in
theory a null and void activity as you are flying around in space at this moment
in time) so you devoted your study of space to misinformation and personal vend
etta.
your statement of my not having the math to prove it proves my point.
saying that one cannot know anything about nature without knowing the math, is
like saying one cannot know anything about the ocean without reading a book abou
t it. the ocean can be known by sitting and watching it, by swimming in it.
i know a lot about nature, i often observe nature close up. i am constantly obs
erving the natural things. you can see what something is when you get to know it
.
like a friend. you do not get to know the friend by calculating with math their
possible movements. you get to know them by being around them and observing the
m.
NASA scientists and people who are good at math do not observe nature or space
close up but always through the perspective of numbers and technological devices
that distort their perceptions of nature itself. for many years i observed spac
e with my own eyes and understood what stars really are. the human knoledge i le
arned about space and stars was all made up by humans and their devices.