Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
SHORT COMMUNICATIONS
ionic strength but this may have been due to the low charge of this
protein. The binding to starch was not evident with any of the proteins
studied in tris buffer at pH 8.6, I = 0.01.
The obvious differences in the binding behavior of different proteins
during electrophoresis just described suggests that use might be made
of the ion-exchange properties of columns of starch gel particles at acid
pH values and low ionic strengths for protein separations. At an ionic
strength of 0.01 at pH 3.1, t.he capacity of starch gel for plasma albumin
is in the region of 10 mg/gm dry starch. Lathe and Ruthven (6) have
stressed the necessity of using high ionic strengths when using swollen
potato starch for gel filtration. If mobility measurements are to be made
from electrophoresis runs conducted at acid pH values, it is obviously
necessary to consider the effect of buffer ionic strength. Where possible,
high ionic strengths should be used.
REFERENCES
1. SMITHIES,
O., Nature
175, 307 (1955).
2. SMITHIES, O., Biochem.
J. 71, 585 (1959).
3. WIEME, R. J., C&n. Chim. Acta 5, 150 (1959).
4. ROBINSON,
J. C., AND PIERCE, J. E., Am. .I. Clin. Path. 40, 588 (1963).
5. KLAPPER, M. H., AND HACKETT, D. P., Biochim. Biophys. Acta 96,
6. LATHE, G. H., AND RUTHVEX,
C. R. J., Biochem. J. 62, 665 (1956).
272 (1965)
J. W. LEE
RHONDA
~UCIVER
Ion-Exchange
XIV.
Thin-Layer
Chromatography
Nucleoside diphosphate sugars and nucleoside monophosphates differing only with regard to their hexose or pentose moieties may be separated
by partition (1, 2) or ion-exchange chroma,tography (3-5) if borate is
incorporated into the solvent. Such separations may be obtained on columns (3), paper (1, 2) or thin layers (4, 5). Our own work (6, 7) had
576
SHORT
COMMUNICATIONS
SHORT
COMMUNICATIONS
577
Results:
System 1 separates mainly according to the phosphate and
base moieties of the nucleotides.
The mobilities
decrease as follows
(see Fig. 1, first dimension) : monophosphates
> nucleosidc diphosphate
FIG. 1. Two-dimensional
separation of nucleotides. PEI-cellulose layer (0.5 mm).
100 pl of an aqueous solution containing 6-12 mpmoles of each nucleotide was applied
to the starting spot (St) in 5ql portions without intermediate drying. Development
as described in the text. First dimension, from right to left, 15 cm; second dimension,
from bottom to top, 16 cm. Total chromatography time about 5 hr. 1 = CTP, 2 =
GDP (impurity in the GDP-mannose preparation used), 3 = UDP-glucuronic
acid,
4 = GDP-mannose,
5 = GDP-glucose,
6 = CDP, 7 = UDP-galactose,
8 = UDP10 = TDP-glucose,
11 = ADP-ribosr,
12 =
glucose, 9 = UDP-N-acetylglucosamine,
GMP, 13 = dGMP, 14 = ADP-glucose, 15 = IMP, 16 = VMP, 17 = CDP-glucose,
18 = dTMP; 19 = AMP, 20 = dAMP, 21 = CMP, itnd 22 = dCMP. Photographed
by short-wave u.ltraviolet light.
sugars > diphosphates > triphosphates, and cytidine > adenosine >
uridine (thymidine ) > inosine > guanosine derivatives of the same type.
The borate system separates nccoiding to the sugar moiety: while System
1 hardly differentiates between VDP-glucose and UDP-galactose or
between CMP and dCMP, these compounds are clearly separated by
System 2. As shown in Fig. 1 (second dimension), nucleotide glucose pre-
578
SHORT
COMMUNICATIONS
Pm. 2. Comparison
between
PEI-cellulose
thin-layer
chromatography
(PEI-TLC)
and PEI-paper
chromatography
(PEI-PC).
10, 5, and 1 ~1 of an aqueous
solution
containing
6-12 mpmoles/J
each of UMP,
UDP-N-acetylglucosamine,
UDP-glucose,
and UDP
were applied
to starting
spots 1, 2, and 3, respectively.
Both chromatograms
were developed
using System
1 up to 15 cm from
the origin.
Development
times
121 min (PEI-TLC)
and 58 min (PEI-PC).
a = UMP,
b = UDP-N-acetylglucosamine,
c = UDP-glucose,
d = UDP.
A very small amount
of an unknown
impurity
(i) in the mixture
shows up only on thin layer,
not on paper.
Photographed
by
short-wave
ultraviolet
light.
SHORT
579
COMMUNICATIONS
PEI-paper
chromatography
(Fig. 2) shows that, under identical conditions, substance zones on ion-exchange plates are more distinct than on
ion-exchange paper. Mobilities
are generally slightly greater on PEIpaper than on PEI-cellulose
layers. Although a number of separations
can be carried out on PEI-paper
(9, 12), thin-layer
procedures are
preferable for separations requiring great sensitivity and/or a high degree
of resolution.
The procedures outlined in the present communication
can be used to
assay incubation mixtures and tissue extracts. Nucleotides are transferred quantit.atively
from thin-layer plates to a paper wick and are
determined spectrophotometrically
after elution from the paper (10).
Substance areas on paper chromatograms and on plastic plates are cut
out, eluted with 0.7M MgCI,/B M tris hydrochloride,
pH 7.4 (lOO:l,
v/v), and nucleotides are determined spectrophotometrically
(11).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work
has been supported
by
Commission
(AT(30-I)-2643),
the U.
National
Science
Foundation
(22138),
No. 1233 of the Cancer
Commission
of
grants-in-aid
from
S. Public
Health
and the Wellcome
Harvard
University.
the U. S. Atomic
Energy
Service
(CA 5018-081,
the
Trust.
This is publication
REFERENCES
1. KLENOW,
H., AND LICHTLER,
E., Biochim.
Biophys.
Acta 23, 6 (1957).
2. CARMINATTI,
H., PASSERON, S., DANKERT,
M., AND RECONDO,
E., J. Chromatog.
18, 342 (1965).
3. COHN, W. E., AND BOLLUM,
F. J., Biochim.
Biophys.
Acta 48, 588 (1961).
4. DIETRICH,
C. P., DIETRICH,
S. M. C., AND PONTIS, H. G., J. Chromatog.
15, 277
(1964).
5. RANDERATH,
K., Biochim.
Biophys.
Acta 76, 622 (1963).
6. RANDERATH,
K., AND RANDERATH, E., J. Chromatog.
16, 111 (1964).
7. RANDERATH,
E., AND RANDERATH, K., J. Chromatog.
16, 126 (1964).
8. RANDERATH,
K., Angew.
Chem. 74, 780 (19622); Intern.
Ed. 1, 553 (1962).
9. VERACHTERT, H., BASS, S. T., WILDER, J., AND HANSEN,
R. G., Anal. Biochem.
11,
497 ( 1965).
10. RANDERATH,
E., AND RANDERATH,
K., Anal. Biochem.
12, 83 (1965).
11. RANDERATH,
K., AND RANDERATH,
E., in Nucleic
Acids
(L. Grossman
and
K. Moldave,
eds.), a volume
of Methods
in Enzymology
(S. P. Colowick
and N. 0. Kaplan,
eds.-in-chief).
Academic
Press, New York,
in preparation.
12. RANDERATH,
K., J. Chromutog.
10, 235 (1963).
K. RANDERATH
E.
Biochemical
Research
Laboratory
and
John Collins
Warren
Laboratories
of the
Huntington
Memorial
Hospital
of Harvard
at the Massachusetts
General
Hospital
Boston,
Massachusetts
Received
August
31,1966
University
RANDERATH