PressReleasePing

'Free Speech' Dogmatization, Ethico-Moral

Shortfalls and Logical Fallacies: An
Analytical Discourse and Scholarly
Treatise by SAARC Postdoctoral Academic
Dr. Bareera N.B.
There exists nowhere in the world where licenses can be granted that ?one can flagrantly say
and blatantly express whatever he or she likes to?---. Instead, reasonably, there are certain
limits that one is supposed to be within. The kind of the ?moral trait-outlook? manifested by
certain vagrant quarters, on the face of ?free speech?, is neither justifiable nor explicable, on
the least of any of; the moral, ethical, judicial or humanitarian accounts!
Lahore, Pakistan, Asia, January 08, 2016 /PressReleasePing/ - 'Freedom of Speech' is the
narrative that is vastly and quite pretentiously used by certain quarters, to not only validate,
but justify and vindicate the sacrileges, profanities and religious blasphemies.

The notion of an 'absolute free speech' serves as a pretext as well as the basic 'construct of
interpretation' for the motives ahead of certain sentiments-injuring acts and the nefarious
designs behind igniting the hatred inflaming.

Todays' radical debate, as well as a serious communal-issue of the moment is, "... Mr. ABC
holds an 'absolute right' to free speech", or "...No compromises can be made on ..Mr. XYZ's
'freedom of expression'.." etc. These narratives are being narrated and re-narrated by many
people so senselessly and inconsiderately, that it appears as if one has never paused for a
moment and thought of the stark implications for what he or she is stating or endorsing of!

The Dogma-notion of Free Speech:

Does the 'free speech' notion hold an absolute value anywhere? Even in the western
culture? Can 'freedom of expression' be meant for; over-riding the humane and ethical
deedssabotaging the entire ethico-moral codesbulldozing the whole cross-communal or

inter-ethnic human values system..? These are some thorny questions posed over to the mind
that holds some rationality, any sense of right and wrong, or at least, a more or less
conscience or some scruples of righteousness within one's self.

Exercising 'free speech', that may ardently injure or sensitively indignant a certain ethnicity, is
criminalized, in almost all western countries. Henceforth, the sacrileges and profanities
crossing all the limits of ethical or moral codes, and even in most of the cases abolishing all
humanity-based values, cannot be rationalized, by any means or on any account, to be
permissible or tolerable to mutilate, harm and detriment the inter-ethnic peace of global
communities by planting the seeds of hatred abhorrence or blasphemies.

There exists nowhere in the world where licenses are granted that one can flagrantly say and
blatantly express whatever he or she likes to; but reasonably, there are certain limits that one
is supposed to be within.

However, pretty conversely, the kind of the 'moral trait-outlook' manifested by certain vagrant
quarters, on the face of 'free speech', is neither justifiable, nor explicable on the least of any of
the moral, ethical, judicial or humanitarian accounts!

Analyzing the Dogma-notion---An Open License to Free Speech?:

Advocating for an 'open license' to the 'free speech' and spreading the dogma-notion behind
this, is nothing, but a clumsily and maladroitly 'disgraceful-enough' modality of ridiculous
manifestations by deflated societies, having no acclimatization of moral perspectives.

While advocating the tarnished-hatred, apparently, the 'tender-keepers' of free speech, along
with their biased and discriminatory partisan means, present certain devious and deceitful
arguments in wrapped misconceptions and logical-fallacies.

So thoughtlessly, not only to the extents of public spheres, but also many of the so-called
communal 'opinion-builders' are onto the 'dogma', that they aren't even aware of. More or
less, completely side-tracking or ignoring the far-reaching corollary repercussions, the
consequential upshots and the socio-moral reverberations associated therewith.

However, when it reaches to the end of the tether or the commonsense truss-leash, one can
easily comprehend and realize the rationality-based questions that arise from such naive
argumentative fallacies.

Examining the reason-index:

Now, for instance, lets examine that: are these reason-indexes actually so, as they are
dogmatized to appear or opinionated to spread out? Do these jargons and verbiages certainly
provide some justifiable grounds for a 'free speech' without any limits? With an absolute builtin value capable to bulldoze all other values..?..Especially when it comes to the sensitivitiesbased sentiments?

These are not, but just some of the simplest questions out of an entire cluster of rationalitydemanding enigma-paradoxes, that are serious-enough in their nature. Not only are questions
enigmas, but, in a literal sense, these are the 'essential morality-probes' for a considerate
mind that can hold to the state of affairs, when it comes to moral convictions. Henceforth,
these 'probes' are to be dealt with great trepidations.

The Senselessness behind the Talk of the Town:

Today's talk of the town, " Charlie Hebdo or Riss has an 'absolute right' to free speech", is
being repetitively narrated everywhere as senselessly as it could be and as thoughtlessly as it
should be!

Not need to mention, Charlie Hebdo has an evident track-record for stoking up the 'flames of
racial hate' and promoting cross-ethnic rancor content and abhorrence that is progressively
proceeding towards austere hatred revulsions and animosity conflicts. It has long continued to
push hatred, revulsive and rhetoric pomposity through its satiric, magniloquence and a series
of tarnish ads.

Charlie Hebdo has got notorious escalations in promoting ethnic hate throughout the globe,
and henceforth, is labeled as a 'hate-content-promotion-group', by the academics.

About Dr. Bareera N.B.:

Dr. Bareera N. B. is a post-doc anthropological researcher and an academic analyst on the

subject. She currently serves as the UPC's chair in SAARC Post-Doc Academia. She is
presently engaged in peace-conflict studies, as an external assessor of peace and counterterrorism studies at National Post-doctoral Association USA.

The rational argumentative confrontation of an 'absolute free speech' by the NPA's

anthropological analyst from SAARC region, Dr. Bareera N. B. has staunchly deplored,
denounced and debunked, the shameful appalling behind the reprehensible defiance by
Charlie Hebdo, that it has used to manifest in the name of free speech so far. All of this is
nothing but the cravings and fervidly eager desperateness, that is once again on board to
satisfy those who prefer to fill their heads and hearts with hatred contents.

This is the mind-set, that is planting the seeds of terrorism by committing such acts that are
not only disgraceful but essentially of an 'omni-injuring' nature in their own right and an 'omniinflaming' potential within!

Lt. Col.(R) Azhar Saleem

SAARC Academia?s Anti-Blasphemy Action Commission
saarc-sec@asia.com
www.saarc-sec.org
Source URL: http://pressreleaseping.com/free-speech-dogmatization-ethico-moral-shortfalls-and-logicalfallacies-analytical-discourse-and