Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
GLASGOW 2011
British Academy
PROCEEDINGS OF THE
XIV th INTERNATIONAL NUMISMATIC CONGRESS
GLASGOW 2009
II
CONTENTS
Preface
Editors note
18
19
Inaugural lecture
A foreigners view of the coinage of Scotland, by Nicholas MAYHEW
23
Antiquity: Greek
I Delfini (distribuzione, associazioni, valenza simbolica), by Pasquale APOLITO
35
42
48
Up-to-date survey of the silver coinage of the Nabatean king Aretas IV, by Rachel
BARKAY
52
58
67
Not only art! The period of the signing masters and historical iconography,
by Maria CACCAMO CALTABIANO
73
81
89
97
105
114
123
CONTENTS
131
The coinage of the Scythian kings in the West Pontic area: iconography, by
Dimitar DRAGANOV
140
The royal archer and Apollo in the East: Greco-Persian iconography in the
Seleukid Empire, by Kyle ERICKSON & Nicholas L. WRIGHT
163
170
178
184
189
199
203
213
Archaic Greek coins east of the Tigris: evidence for circulation?, by J. KAGAN
230
237
246
251
The coinage of Chios during the Hellenistic and early Roman periods, by
Constantine LAGOS
259
265
CONTENTS
269
280
285
293
Some remarks concerning the gold coins with the legend , by Lucian
MUNTEANU
304
310
The coinage of the Paeonian kings Leon and Dropion, by Eftimija PAVLOVSKA
319
Le trsor des monnaies perses dor trouv Argamum / Orgam (Jurilovca, dp.
de Tulcea, Roumanie), by E. PETAC, G. TALMACHI & V. IONI
331
337
350
357
365
The coin finds from Hellenistic and Roman Berytas (fourth century BC third
century AD, by Ziad SAWAYA
376
382
Uso della moneta presso gli indigeni della Sicilia centro-meridionale, by Lavinia
SOLE
393
405
CONTENTS
417
427
436
Zur Datierung und Deutung der Beizeichen auf Stateren von Grtyn, by
Burkhard TRAEGER
441
447
461
473
487
The civic bronze coins of the Eleans: some preliminary remarks, by Franck
WOJAN
497
500
Antiquity: Roman
The coinage of Diva Faustina I, by Martin BECKMANN
509
514
The key to the Varus defeat: the Roman coin finds from Kalkriese, by Frank
BERGER
527
Monetary circulation in the Bosporan Kingdom in the Roman period c. first fourth century AD, by Line BJERG
533
The Roman coin hoards of the second century AD found on the territory of
present-day Serbia: the reasons for their burial, by Bojana BORI-BREKOVI
538
CONTENTS
Die Mnzprgung des Thessalischen Bundes von Marcus Aurelius bis Gallienus
(161-268 n. Chr.), by Friedrich BURRER
545
557
569
576
580
592
Analytical evidence for the organization of the Alexandrian mint during the
Tetrarchy (III-IV centuries AD), by J.M.COMPANA, L. LEN-REINA, F.J.
FORTES, L.M. CABALN, J.J. LASERNA, & M.A.G. ARANDA
595
605
613
621
629
635
Monuments on the move: architectural coin types and audience targeting in the
Flavian and Trajanic periods, by Nathan T. ELKINS
645
657
662
CONTENTS
668
New coins of pre- and denarial system minted outside Italy, by Paz GARCABELLIDO
676
686
696
709
Mars and Venus on Roman imperial coinage in the time of Marcus Aurelius:
iconological considerations with special reference to the emperors
correspondence with Marcus Cornelius Fronto, by Jrgen HAMER
715
The silver coins of Aegeae in the light of Hadrians eastern silver coinages, by F.
HAYMANN
720
726
732
742
749
757
765
772
The Nome coins: some remarks on the state of research, by Katarzyna LACH
780
785
CONTENTS
794
800
809
816
822
828
839
846
856
864
Die Sammlung von Lokalmythen griechischer Stdte des Ostens: ein Projekt der
Kommission fr alte Geschichte und Epigraphik, by Johannes NOLL
872
878
888
893
901
Could the unofficial mint called Atelier II be identified with the officinae of
Chteaubleau (France)?, by Fabien PILON
906
CONTENTS
911
916
926
933
941
A stone thesaurus with a votive coin deposit found in the sanctuary of Campo
della Fiera, Orvieto (Volsinii), by Samuele RANUCCI
954
964
973
Numismatics and archaeology in Rome: the finds from the Basilica Hilariana,
by Alessia ROVELLI
983
991
999
1004
1013
1019
1020
1025
CONTENTS
1037
The iconography of two groups of struck lead from Central Italy and Baetica in
the second and first centuries BC, by Clive STANNARD
1045
1056
Personalized victory on coins: the Year of the Four Emperors Greek imperial
issues, by Yannis STOYAS
1067
1073
1082
Gold and silver first tetrarchic issues from the mint of Alexandria, by D. Scott
VANHORN
1092
Note sulla circolazione monetaria in Etruria meridionale nel III secolo a.C., by
Daniela WILLIAMS
1103
Roman coins from the western part of West Balt territory, by Anna ZAPOLSKA
1115
Antiquity: Celtic
La moneda ibrica del nordeste de la Hispania Citerior: consideraciones sobre
su cronologa y funcin, by Marta CAMPO
1135
1142
1148
1155
Trading with silver bullion during the third century BC: the hoard of Armua de
Tajua, by Manuel GOZALBES, Gonzalo CORES & Pere Pau RIPOLLS
1165
1173
10
CONTENTS
1182
1191
1198
New coin finds from the two late Iron Age settlements of Altenburg (Germany)
and Rheinau (Switzerland) a military coin series on the German-Swiss border?,
by Michael NICK
1207
1218
Antiquity: general
La moneda en el mundo funerario-ritual de Gadir-Gades, by A. ARVALO
GONZLEZ
1231
Neues Licht auf eine alte Frage? Die Verwandschaft von Mnzen und Gemmen,
by Angela BERTHOLD
1240
Tipi del cane e del lupo sulle monete del Mediterraneo antico, by Alessandra
BOTTARI
1247
Not all these things are easy to read, much less to understand: new approaches to
reading images on ancient coins, by Geraldine CHIMIRRI-RUSSELL
1254
1261
Preliminary notes on Phoenician and Punic coins kept in the Pushkin Museum,
by S. KOVALENKO & L.I. MANFREDI
1266
Greek coins from the National Historical Museum of Rio de Janeiro: SNG
project, by Marici Martins MAGALHES
1278
1292
The sacred life of coins: cult fees, sacred law and numismatic evidence, by
Isabelle A. PAFFORD
1303
Anton Prokesch-Osten and the Greek coins of the coin collection at the
Universalmuseum Joanneum in Graz, Austria, by Karl PEITLER
1310
CONTENTS
11
1323
1334
Greek and Roman coins in the collection of the orum Museum, by D. zlem
YALCIN
1344
1355
1360
1372
1382
1392
1401
1408
1411
Norwegian bracteates during the twelfth and thirteenth centuries, by Linn EIKJE
1418
1426
1431
1436
1441
12
CONTENTS
1452
1458
1464
Among farmers and city people: coin use in early medieval Denmark, c. 10001250, by Gitte Tarnow INGVARDSON
1470
1477
1492
Byzantine coins from the area of Belarus, by Krystyna LAVYSH & Marcin
WOOSZYN
1500
Die frheste Darstellung des Richters auf einer mittelalterlicher Mnze?, by Ivar
LEIMUS
1509
Coinage and money in the years of insecurity: the case of late Byzantine
Chalkidiki (thirteenth - fourteenth century), by Vangelis MALADAKIS
1517
1535
The money of the First Crusade: the evidence of a new parcel and its
implications, by Michael MATZKE
1542
1552
1557
1564
1570
CONTENTS
13
1580
1591
The discovery of a hoard of coins dated to the fifth and sixth centuries in
Klapavice in the hinterland of ancient Salona, by Tomislav EPAROVI
1597
1605
1614
1620
1625
1633
1640
1649
1664
1671
1679
The money box system for savings in Amsterdam, 1907-1935, by G.N. BORST
1687
1693
14
CONTENTS
1704
1713
1719
1725
1734
1744
1748
Representaciones del caf en el acervo de numismtica del Museu Paulista USP, by Angela Maria Gianeze RIBEIRO
1752
Freiburg im echtland und die Mnzreformen der franzsischen Knige (16891726), by Nicole SCHACHER
1758
1765
1774
The political context of the origin and the exportation of thaler-coins from
Jchymov (Joachimsthal) in the first half of the sixteenth century, by Petr
VOREL
1778
The late sixteenth-century Russian forged kopecks, which were ascribed to the
English Muscovy Company, by Serguei ZVEREV
1783
1789
1796
CONTENTS
15
1807
1813
1821
1826
Numismatic research in Japan today: coins, paper monies and patterns of usage.
Paper money in early modern Japan: economic and folkloristic aspects, by
Keiichiro KATO
1832
1841
A study of medieval Chinese coins from Karur and Madurai in Tamil Nadu, by
KRISHNAMURTHY RAMASUBBAIYER
1847
1852
Silver fragments of unique Byid and amdnid coins and their role in the Kel
hoard (Czech Republic), by Vlastimil NOVK
1862
Numismatic evidence for the location of Saray, the capital of the Golden Horde,
by A.V. PACHKALOV
1869
Le regard des voyageurs sur les monnaies africaines du XVIe au XIXe sicles, by
Josette RIVALLAIN
1874
Les imitations des dirhems carrs almohades: apport des analyses lmentaires,
by A. TEBOULBI, M. BOMPAIRE & M. BLET-LEMARQUAND
1884
1890
Glass jetons from Sicily: new find evidence from the excavations at Monte Iato,
by Christian WEISS
1897
Medals
Joseph Kowarzik (1860-1911): ein Medailleur der Jahrhundertwende, by
Kathleen ADLER
1907
16
CONTENTS
1920
1931
1937
1945
The rediscovery of the oldest private medal collection of the Netherlands, by Jan
PELSDONK
1959
1965
Shines with unblemished honour: some thoughts on an early nineteenthcentury medal, by Tuukka TALVIO
1978
General numismatics
Dalliconografia delle monete antiche allideologia della nazione future.
Proiezioni della numismatica grecista di DAnnunzio sulla nuova monetazione
Sabauda, by Giuseppe ALONZO
1985
1993
The Count of Caylus (1692-1765) and the study of ancient coins, by Franois de
CALLATA
1999
2004
2012
2017
A prosopography of the mint officials: the Eligivs database and its evolution, by
Luca GIANAZZA
2022
2027
CONTENTS
17
2036
2044
Foundation of the Hellenic World. A new private collection open to the public,
by Eleni PAPAEFTHYMIOU
2046
2047
2058
2072
2082
2089
2100
From the electrum to the Euro: a journey into the history of coins. A multimedia
presentation by the Bank of Cyprus Cultural Foundation, by Eleni ZAPITI
2102
Highlights from the Museum of the George and Nefeli Giabra Pierides
Collection, donated by Clio and Solon Triantafyllides: coins and artefacts, by
Eleni ZAPITI & Evangeline MARKOU
2112
Index of Contributors
2118
2000
FRANOIS DE CALLATA
so proved to be not too far from the now famously mocked abb Hardouin, who held only coins as
trustworthy witnesses of the past, dismissing at once almost all our literary evidence.4
I would like to argue in this paper that Caylus is worthy of quotation in the history of numismatics, definitively more so in that respect than Johann Joachim Winckelmann. A first but unimportant reason is that he left his name on a numismatic book published soon after his death without
indication of place or date, but which was produced in his youth (c. 1730):5 the publication of the
Republican and Imperial Roman gold coins belonging to the king of France, (Numismata aurea
Imperatorum Romanorum e Cimelio Regis Christianissimi delineata et aeri incise, s.l. [Paris], s.d.
[1766?], 68 plates). All the coins approximately 1,500 were drawn and engraved in copper by
Caylus himself, whose name appears in bold letters on the title page. No text was provided with
the plates, on which the engravings are of a decent quality.
His real tribute to numismatics is to be found in his opus magnum, his Recueil dantiquits
gyptiennes, grecques, trusques et romaines, the first volume of which appeared in 1752 and the
seventh and last one in 1767, shortly after his death in 1765. These seven volumes form an extraordinary disparate monument in which coins are actually rarely reproduced but, as we shall see,
when they are, they are done so with an original and surprisingly modern angle.
Caylus and the French numismatists: Claude Gros de Boze, Jean-Jacques Barthlemy,
Joseph Pellerin and the others
The second reason is more profound: the Count of Caylus knew everybody in the small world of
antiquarians, and among them the numismatists. He knew Claude Gros de Boze (1680-1753) very
well, who was the keeper of the royal coin cabinet (1719-1753), as well as the perpetual secretary
of the Acadmie des Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres (from 1706).6 Gros de Boze used to receive for
dinner every Tuesday and Wednesday a group of Academicians.
Jean-Jacques Barthlemy.
It was there that Barthlemy met Caylus for the first time in the late 1740s.7 Caylus, now
in his fifties and passionate about antiquities, quickly became acquainted with this long abbot
(as he was later nicknamed), so gifted with the knowledge of ancient languages. Caylus himself
never studied Greek and tried courageously to improve his Latin when he became recognized as
an antiquarian.8 His knowledge of the secondary literature was not great, leading him sometimes
to reveal his insufficiencies, as when he comically charged Paciaudi to send his best greetings to
Cyriacus of Ancona (died in 1455).9 The services the young Jean-Jacques Barthlemy (born 24
years after Caylus) may have provided to him were evident, as well as the social openings Caylus
may have offered to Barthlemy.
For sure, Barthlemy became one of his faiseurs and this is plainly recognized in the introduction of the first volume.10 But to what extent? Was he really the instigator of the Recueil? Did
he suggest, and then convince the count to embark on, what remains his most important achievement, as argued by Sainte-Croix, the biographer of Barthlemy?11 Should we recognize the long
abbot behind any comments in the inscriptions? The first edition of Barthlemys works is far more
restricted: it ends with a notice entitled Dans le recueil dAntiquits de Caylus which attributes
Caylus, Recueil, VI, 1764, pp. 151-2, pl. XLV, N 1.
As was made clear in the letter written by Caylus on 5 January 1730 to the
abbot Antonio Conti (see Rocheblave 1889, p. 154, n. 3 and Rees 2006, p. 73).
6
See Babelon 1928, pp. 22-4.
7
Rocheblave 1889, p. 93, n. 4.
8
On his poor knowledge of Latin, see Srieys 1802, p. 183 (letter
4
5
2001
to him four passages, the only four about which Caylus is explicit about his debt to Barthlemy.
A Nota bene adds: Barthlemy a fourni encore diverses remarques au comte de Caylus pour ce
recueil, et la aid beaucoup dans la rdaction du premier volume.12
Caylus and Barthlemy never became friends. Both disliked obligations and they were both
obliged to each other. Barthlemy, whose printed autobiography is mute about these details, not
only owed to Caylus his election at the Acadmie des Inscriptions but, partly, also his position as
the successor of Claude Gros de Boze as keeper of the royal coin cabinet.13 But, as exemplified
by several passages of his correspondence to Paciaudi, Barthlemy denied considering Caylus a
true antiquarian but constantly treated him as a grand seigneur. Caylus, on his side, moderately
appreciated this lack of esteem disguised with high consideration. In September 1763, he wrote to
Paciaudi: Ne craignez rien de ce que je puis dire Barthlemy. Sans clat, jai retir tout doucement mes troupes. Il en sait trop long pour moi, et nous sommes comme nous serons le reste de
notre vie.14 Sarcasms against Barthlemy are clearly expressed in his late correspondence with
Paciaudi.15 There we find that Caylus disliked the too close relationship of the abbot with the duchess of Choiseul, born Louis-Honorine Crozat, who was often left alone by a too busy husband.
When Caylus died, Barthlemy wrote to Paciaudi : Depuis nous avons perdu ce pauvre comte ; je
lai regrett et le regrette encore bien vivement. Mais ma douleur a t au comble par la mort de
ce pauvre ambassadeur (Solar), qui vous savez combien jtais attach.16 Barthlemy could not
have been more explicit about his priorities.
Joseph Pellerin.
The other major numismatic character of the time in Paris was Joseph Pellerin, called the old
since he lived nearly a century (1684-1782). Pellerin built the largest collection of ancient coins
of his time, about 33,000 coins, especially strong in Greek coins. Pensioned in 1745, Pellerin,
already nearly blind, devoted the rest of his long life to studying his coins. From 1762 to 1778,
he published the ten volumes of his numismatic Recueil with different subtitles, such as Recueil
de mdailles de peuples et de villes qui nont point encore t publies ou qui sont peu connues.
This numismatic monument may have been inspired by Caylus himself, as is claimed by Charles
Lebeau.17 There are several similarities between these two gigantic Recueils: not only the titles and
the sizes of the enterprises, but also the very idea of publishing interesting pieces as they come
along. It is not unlikely that Caylus engraved some of the coins reproduced by Pellerin, as we may
infer from a letter to Paciaudi where, speaking of the fourth volume of Pellerin, he says auquel je
travaille.18 In any case, we see Caylus following the progresses of the Recueil de mdailles, well
aware of what would likely be the considerable interest in the publication of Latakies hoard, the
first hoard of Greek coin to have ever been published.19
Relations between Caylus and Pellerin are well attested. Pellerin, who ended his career as
Premier commis de la Marine and was living in Rue de Richelieu, had a large network of correspondents too but, in 1759, his confidence was broken in the man he used to employ as his intermediary in Italy. Caylus asked Paciaudi to find another correspondent for him adding that Pellerin
had one of the most beautiful and largest coin cabinets in Europe. This commission was difficult
and Paciaudi failed. Paciaudi himself was versed in numismatics and praised Pellerin as by far
superior to Patin, Vaillant, Spanheim and all the band of antiquarians. 20 He once sent him some
Sainte-Croix, 1797-1798, IV, p. 226.
Archives de lInstitut, C9 see Fumaroli 1995.
14
Nisard 1877, p. 355 (Letter LXIX).
15
Ibid., p. 372 (Letter LXXII, 24 Oct. 1763), p. 423 (LXXXIII, 26
February 1764), p. 461 (LXXXIX, 1st April 1764).
16
Ibid., pp. 280-1 (Letter XXXIV, 14 Oct. 1765).
12
13
17
Charles Le Beau, Eloge de Caylus, in Mmoires de lAcadmie des
Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres, XXXIV, 1770, p. 221 (?) see Rocheblave
1889, p. 121, n. 3.
18
Nisard 1877, p. 372 (Letter LXXII of Caylus to Paciaudi, 24 Oct.
1763).
19
Ibid., p. 343 (Letter LXIX of Caylus to Paciaudi, 26 Sept. 1763).
2002
FRANOIS DE CALLATA
coins found in Venice through the intermediary of Caylus, who felt very obliged. The counterpart
of these mediations for Caylus was free access to the coin collection of Pellerin who, in addition,
offered him some pieces.
Caylus was truly instrumental for advancing everybodys agenda and he enjoyed appearing as
such, even in numismatic matters as exemplified by a letter of Pierre-Jean Mariette to Paciaudi:
Jaurais souhait vous envoyer la notice de quelques mdailles de lancienne Ithaque, suppos que
M. Pellerin en ait quelquune dans sa collection, mais M. de Caylus, qui tait prsent louverture
de votre lettre, sest saisi de la commission, et ce sera par lui que vous en serez clairci.21
The modernity of Caylus
Barthlemy and Pellerin were the leading numismatic authorities of their time and certainly Caylus
was not in a position to compete with them, but I would argue that Caylus was more modern than both
of them, and that the rare numismatic passages dispersed in his Recueil des antiquits are possibly
more illuminating for current research than the much more extended writings of the two French coryphes of eighteenth-century numismatic science.
Caylus simply looked at the coins differently or, better still, left the coins to numismatists while
he concentrated on all their contextual surroundings. Typical is his commentary on a mounted gold
Roman coin of Maximus. His interest goes far beyond the coin itself: it goes to the fact that, because it
was mounted, this coin is remarkably well preserved; moreover, it attests to a social habit: the flattery
of citizens towards their emperors.22 Above all, Caylus was interested in how things were produced. It
comes as no surprise then that he succeeded in acquiring the only surviving coin-die out of two found
in 1739 in the fountain in Nmes23 which he compared with the one kept at the Bibliothque SainteGenevive. Not only did he provide accurate measurements of length and height, as he was wont to do
systematically, but he slightly filed the edge of the die to test its composition and analyze its different
components. Cayluss attention was also drawn to the clay moulds, found in Lyon at the very beginning of the eighteenth century, prepared to produce cast coins.24 His explanations could easily find a
receptive audience today. He tried to cast coins himself and succeeded in reproducing the operation
with the same clay moulds. Hence his conclusion that these moulds were not necessarily the works
of counterfeiters, but may have served as an expedient in production, especially since they were used
to reproduce bad silver coins. He argued that beside struck coins, Roman emperors may have also issued cast coins, and that this phenomenon was not limited to them. Indeed, Caylus provided another
example in his volume V of some bronzes of Massalia (which, in addition, he sent to La Monnaie de
Paris to be tested).25 This is truly a modern approach, if we consider, for example, how the same point
of view has recently been expressed for Ptolemaic bronzes. Being far more advanced than traditional
antiquarians, here taken mainly as philologists, he typically concludes : Mais cest aux antiquaires qui
joignent dautres connaissances celle du mtal, juger de mes vues et des consquences que jen ai
tires (p. 291).26 Despite the claim that Barthlemy was greatly instrumental in the first volume, it is
clear that these comments have to be attributed to Caylus only. Ironically, Barthlemy is, however, responsible for a not too fortunate comment in the second volume: it deals with a golden leaf found on an
Egyptian mummy for which the long abbot assumed that it could be the first money of the Egyptians,
an hypothesis which has received no support since.27 Lead weights were another matter of interest for
Srieys 1802, p. 297 (Letter LXXI of Paciaudi to Caylus, 8 Oct. 1763).
Nisard 1877, p. 318 (Letter II of Mariette to Paciaudi, 6 April 1759).
22
Caylus, Recueil V, 1762, pp. 313-4 and Pl. CXII, No. I-II.
23
Caylus, Recueil, I, 1752, pp. 284-5 and Pl. CV, No. I.
24
Ibid., pp. 286-91 and Pl. CV, No. II.
20
21
Caylus, Recueil, V, 1762, pp. 159-60 and Pl. LVI, No. VI.
The question of moulds was of prime interest for Caylus who gave them
long comments in Recueil, IV, 1759, pp. 343-54 (discussing the quality of
clays, oils to be used and materials in which moulds can be made).
25
26
2003
Caylus, who published one found in Chio lent to him for study by Joseph Pellerin.28 Tesserae formed
another category of material close to the coins. Caylus commented on three of them engraved in ivory
in his third volume.29 Noticing that each of these ivory tesserae had to be cut individually, he made the
sensible and general comment that they are proofs of a Roman magnificence funneled into small details. In addition, on the same plate, Caylus illustrates some lead pieces with monetary images. Instead
of identifying them as trial-pieces, as has often been the case (wrongly in my mind) in recent scholarship, he considers them as simple fantasies.30 Comparing coins and gems, either cameos or intaglios,
Cayluss sentiment is that gems have more often provided a model for die-cutters than the opposite.31
Finally, Caylus is to be remembered as a pioneer of Celtic coins, which are usually neglected,
since, as he reminds his reader, they cannot be dated or localized and so are consequently of no use to
the historian.32 Caylus sent a batch of these coins to M. de Quvanne at La Monnaie de Paris, whose
analyses proved that the people who issued these coins were very fine metallurgists. Hence the question: how tribes who had such a poor taste in the arts were so knowledgeable in technology? Our appreciation for Celtic art has changed considerably in the twentieth century, but our surprise at the skill
of Celtic metallurgy remains unchanged.
To conclude, it is true to say that, generally speaking, the count of Caylus had only a modest
interest in coins. But at the same time, what he did was really remarkable and surprisingly modern
for his time.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Babelon, J. (1929), Choix de bronzes de la Collection Caylus. Tome II : Les trsors du cabinet des
Antiques, Paris.
Caylus (1766 ?), Numismata aurea imperatorum romanorum e cimelio regis christianissimi, delineata et aeri incisa a comite de Caylus, s. l., Paris.
Caylus (1752-1767), Recueil dantiquits gyptiennes, grecques, trusques et romaines, 7 vols., Paris.
Fumaroli, M. (1995), Le comte de Caylus et lAcadmie des Inscriptions, CRAI 139, pp. 225-250.
Le Beau, Ch. (1770), Eloge de Caylus, Mmoires de lAcadmie des Inscriptions et BellesLettres XXXIV, p. 221-34.
Nisard, Ch. (1877), Correspondance indite du comte de Caylus avec le P. Paciaudi, thatin
(1757-1765) ; suivie de celles de labb Barthlemy et de P. Mariette avec le mme, Paris.
Rees, J. (2006), Die Kultur des Amateurs : Studien zu Leben und Werk von Anne Claude Philippe
de Thubires, Comte des Caylus (1692-1765), Weimar.
Rocheblave, S. (1889), Essai sur comte de Caylus, lhomme, lartiste, lantiquaire, Paris.
Sainte-Croix, G. de (1797-1798), uvres diverses de J.-J. Barthlemy, 4 vols., Paris.
Srieys, A. (1802), Lettres de Paciaudi au Comte de Caylus, Paris.
27
30
Caylus, Recueil, III, 1759, p. 287 and Pl. LXXVII, No. VII.
28
31
Caylus, Recueil, II, 1756, pp. 18-22 and Pl. IV, No. II.
Ibid., pp. 143-4 and Pl. XLIX, No. I.
29
Caylus, Recueil, III, 1759, pp. 283-4 and Pl. LXXVII on tesserae,
see also Recueil, IV, 1759, pp. 160-1 and Pl. LIV, No. V and VI.
32