Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Natural Law
Some people believe this is also true for morality right and wrong,
good and evil, follow a natural law which is universal and never changes. This is
therefore an absolutist ethical theory.
Origins
Aristotelian ideas:
In Nichomachean Ethics, Aristotle wrote:
That which is natural is unchangeable, and has the same power
everywhere, just as fire burns both here and in Persia
Cicero:
Aristotles causes:
The efficient cause brings about the end; the final cause is
somethings reason for existence
St Paul:
To find out what God wants us to do we can look at the Bible and
church teaching, and apply reason. Aquinas put forward the primary precepts, which he
believed to be the main natural purposes of human existence. They are absolute:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Ethical Theories
The secondary precepts are things we should not do because they go against the primary
precepts, e.g. homosexual relationships go against the primary precept for reproduction.
Strengths
and weaknesses
Strengths
Weaknesses
Ethical Theories
Utilitarianism
RELATIVIST AND TELEOLOGICAL
Act Utilitarianism
Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832) was the first to put forward the
theory of utilitarianism, based on the idea of the greatest good
for the greatest number of people. Bentham was a democratic
reformer and focussed on rights for the majority rather than the
few.
Bentham was a hedonist, and claimed that nature has placed
mankind under the guidance of two sovereign masters, pain and
pleasure. He rejected egoistic hedonism and said that everyone
should be considered equally.
Principle of utility:
Utility means usefulness. The principle of
utility is somethings tendency to produce pain
or pleasure, happiness or unhappiness
Hedonic Calculus
Bentham devised the hedonic calculus as a means of measuring the potential
pleasure/pain that could be caused by an action:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Criticisms of Bentham
Focuses on the majority, and the majority could be wrong, e.g. if sadistic guards
torture a prisoner for their own pleasure
In reality people can never wholly take emotion out of their decisions and will be
egoistic, not democratic
Minority groups will nearly always be in the wrong
Difficult to calculate
Not always time to calculate
Ethical Theories
Rule Utilitarianism
John Stuart Mill (1808-1873) wrote Utilitarianism (1861). Adopted Benthams ideas and
defended the theory of utilitarianism. His approach was qualitative, not quantitative, and
focussed on the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest number of people.
He defined pleasures in two tiers:
Higher pleasures:
Higher pleasures are intellectual pleasures, which are exclusive
to humans. These include art and philosophy
Lower pleasures:
We need both higher and lower pleasures, but Mill believed out of choice we would take
the higher as this is what sets us apart from animals: it is better to be a human being
dissatisfied than a pig satisfied; better to be Socrates dissatisfied than a fool satisfied.
The term rule utilitarianism comes from the fact that with this theory certain actions,
such as killing, stealing and lying are adopted as rules, as they seem to cause more pain
than pleasure in the majority of circumstances (this is more deontological than
teleological.
Act Utilitarianism
It is reasonable
to link morality
with the pursuit
of happiness
and the
avoidance of
pain and misery
Rule Utilitarianism
Overcomes
some
of
the
difficulties encountered in act
utilitarianism
It is natural to
consider the
consequences
of our actions
when deciding
what to do
Ethical Theories
Kantian Ethics
ABSOLUTIST AND DEONTOLOGICAL
Deontological ethical theories are concerned with what our duty is;
Kant believed that is was our duty to follow the moral law. He said
that actions were intrinsically right or wrong, and we should use our
reason to decide how to act in a situation we should act in a certain
way because it is morally right to do so, not because this fulfils our
desires.
Kant believed that we should not let our feelings influence our
decision we must follow the absolute moral law in all circumstances.
He said that it is never our duty to do something it would be
impossible for us to do, and therefore that ought implies can. Moral
statements, according to Kant, are prescriptive.
Analytic statements:
Good will
shines
forth like a
precious
jewel
Ethical Theories
is to aspire to the highest good for its own sake. We should always follow our duty even if
it can cause pain. A moral person must be a rational being, who uses their reason to
decide how to act.
Two things fill the mind with ever new and increasing admiration
and wethe starry heavens above me and the moral law within me
Ethical Theories
The Categorical Imperative
The categorical imperative helps us to know which actions are obligatory and which are
forbidden. It tells us what we ought to do. The moral law is categorical in that it
prescribes actions irrespective of the result. It is different from hypothetical statements in
that they dictate a necessary action to achieve a certain result, but the categorical
imperative is absolute and must be applied to everyone.
1. The Universal Law: Do not act on any principle that cannot be universalised. Moral
Laws must be able to be applied to all situations without
exception. If an action can be considered right for me, it must
be right for everyone. Kant argued that to allow exceptions
would ultimately harm someone and have a negative effect on
society.
2. Ends in themselves: You can never treat a person as a means to an end, using them
for
another
purpose
or
exploiting/enslaving them. You must treat
them as ends in themselves. Humans are
rational and the highest point of creation,
and so demand unique treatment. We
have a duty to develop our own perfection and to seek the
happiness of others, therefore we should not promote
happiness if it prevents anothers happiness.
3. Kingdom of ends:
Freedom
Kant believed that humans were free to make rational choices. If people were not free,
the possibility of making moral choices would be denied. This ability to freely rationalise,
or reason, is what Kant described as the difference between humans and animals. We
have to be free to do our duty, which is to follow the categorical imperative, but if our
choices are not free then we cannot truly be moral agents.
Strengths
Weaknesses
Universalisability generalises
Ethical Theories