Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Ocean Engineering
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/oceaneng
State Key Laboratory of Coastal and Offshore Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, PR China
Center for Deepwater Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, PR China
c
Department of Ocean Engineering, Korea Maritime University, Dongsamdong, Youngdogu, Busan 606-791, Republic of Korea
b
a r t i c l e i n f o
a b s t r a c t
Article history:
Received 10 May 2010
Accepted 30 May 2011
Editor-in-Chief: A.I. Incecik
Laboratory tests have been conducted on vortex-induced vibration (VIV) of a long exible riser towed
horizontally in a wave basin. The riser model has an external diameter of 16 mm and a total length of
28.0 m giving an aspect ratio of about 1750. Reynolds numbers ranged from about 3000 to 10,000. Fiber
optic grating strain gages are adopted to measure the dynamic response in both cross-ow and in-line
directions. The cross-ow vibrations were observed to vibrate at modes up to 6 and the in-line reached
up to 12. The fundamental response frequencies can be predicted by a Strouhal number of about 0.18.
Multi-mode responses and the asymmetry of the bare pipe response in uniform ow were observed and
analyzed. The experimental results conrmed that the riser pipe vibrated multi-modally despite it
being subject to a uniform current prole and all of the excited modes vibrated at the Strouhal
frequency. The asymmetrical distribution of displacement mainly resulted from the modal composition. Higher harmonics of the VIV response such as the third, fourth and fth harmonics frequencies
were found to be steady over the entire duration of the test even if they varied along the length of the
riser pipe.
Crown Copyright & 2011 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Vortex-induced vibration
Flexible riser
Laboratory tests
Multi-mode response
Higher harmonics
Large aspect ratio
1. Introduction
In offshore activities, examples of exible marine pipes are
numerous such as ocean thermal energy conversion pipes, deepwater exploration pipes, oil exploration and production risers.
Recently, vortex-induced vibration (VIV) of exible marine pipes
has received considerable research attention as production operations move into deeper waters where structures become more
exible due to the increase in length over diameter ratio and are
sensitive to VIV. For exploration in ultra-deep waters, the lengths
of exible risers are more than 2000 m with aspect ratios (length
to diameter) of order 103, prone to vibrate at high mode numbers.
The majority of research efforts on VIV in the past have been
focused on the study of rigid cylinders. Many studies on this topic
are discussed in the comprehensive reviews of Sarpkaya (1979),
Grifn and Ramberg (1982), Bearman (1984) and Parkinson (1989),
and also the recent ones of Sarpkaya (2004) and Williamson and
Govardhan (2004, 2008).
Numerical methods for VIV of exible marine structures have
many advantages but still have some uncertainties and require much
computational time. Many discrepancies between experimental
0029-8018/$ - see front matter Crown Copyright & 2011 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.oceaneng.2011.05.020
1309
Table 1
Key parameters of the riser model.
2. Experimental setup
The experiments were carried out in a wave basin at the State
Key Laboratory of Coastal and Offshore Engineering, Dalian University of Technology. The basin is 34 m wide by 55 m long and the
Parameter
Value
Length, L (m)
Outer diameter, D (m)
Inner diameter (m)
Young modulus, E (N/m2)
Bending stiffness (Nm2)
Steel density, r (kg/m3)
Mass ratio, m*
Length/diameter ratio
Pre-tension, Pt (N)
28.04
0.016
0.015
2.10 1011
153.71
7930
1.0
1750
600, 700, 800
Carriage
Track
Spring tension
measurement device
Riser
Tensiometer
Tensioner
Spring
Steelwire
U-joint Riser
Sliding bearing
Fig. 1. Sketch of the experiments.
Y
G14 G12 G10 G8
G6
G4
G2 G1
G13 G11 G9
G7
G5
G3
Fig. 3. Sketch of strain gages arrangement along the axial length of the model.
Before filtering
After filtering
0.02
0.01
Ws (nm)
1310
0
-0.01
-0.02
19
19.2
19.4
19.6
19.8
20
t (s)
Fig. 4. Signal from cross-ow sensor no. 11 before and after band-pass ltering,
Pt 700 N, V 0.24 m/s.
e eT emb edb
e eT emb edb
emb
e e
2
e e
edb
eT
Gauge
Flow
Y
(Cross flow)
X
(In-line)
1
X
wn tjn z,
z A 0,L
n1
where z is the axial coordinate, L the length of the riser, t the time,
wn(t) the modal weight, jn(z) the mode shape, n 1, 2, 3,y .
The mode shapes can be assumed to be sinusoids for a pined
pined riser in the absence of any knowledge of the distribution of
added mass and neglecting the effect of variations in tension:
npz
jn z sin
L
et,z
So
et,z
R
1
X
n1
wn t
np2
npz
sin
L
L
p
beam with fn,beam n2 p=2 EI=mL4 , L is the length, T the tension,
m the mass per unit length and I the moment of inertia of
the beam.
Table 2 shows the comparisons of the rst 12 modes between
the experimental test and the analytical solutions by Eq. (10), for
example Pt 700 N. It can be observed that the experimental and
analytical data are in good agreement. It indicates that the FBG
gages used here work well and are capable of providing accurate
results of strain in the structure vibration.
It can be expected that the natural frequencies of the riser
model in water are smaller than those in air. The natural
frequencies in still water were not measured in the work. Instead
they were predicted by Eq. (10) but with an assumption of the
added mass ratio being 1.0.
3.3. Tension variation
It is expected that the end tension of the riser model would be
altered as it was towed in the water basin due to the actions from
the current drag force. In the present experiment, we measured
the variations of the end tension during the towing tests. Fig. 5
shows the variations of the averaged tension with current speeds
at different pre-tensions. It can be seen that the tension increases
slowly at lower towing speeds while faster at higher speeds. The
increase in the tension seems to be proportional to the square of
the velocity throughout the entire velocity range.
It is well known that the tension has direct effects on the natural
frequencies of the riser, especially for the tension dominated riser.
However, it was not easy to measure the natural frequencies of the
Table 2
Natural frequencies of the riser model in air, Pt 700 N (unit: Hz).
Mode #
Measured
Analytical
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1.07
2.14
3.27
4.43
5.58
6.74
8.00
9.25
10.62
12.05
13.52
15.08
1.08
2.16
3.26
4.39
5.55
6.75
8.01
9.32
10.69
12.13
13.64
15.23
1100
Pt = 800 N
Pt = 700 N
Pt = 600 N
1000
900
Tension (N)
10
fn,beam
fn fn,string
2L m
m
L
1311
800
700
600
500
0.2
0.3
0.4
V (m/s)
0.5
0.6
Fig. 5. Variation in the mean values of the end tension against the velocity.
-6
FG (10 )
10
15
10
11
20
G02
10
15
20
G03
10
15
20
G04
10
15
20
G05
10
15
20
G06
10
15
20
G07
10
15
20
G08
10
15
20
G09
10
15
20
G10
10
15
20
G11
10
15
20
G12
10
15
20
G13
10
15
20
G14
10
15
20
-6
FG (10 )
10
10
15
10
11
12
-6
FG (10 )
20
10
10
15
10
11
12
-6
FG (10 )
20
10
10
15
10
11
12
20
-6
FG (10 )
10
10
15
10
11
12
-6
FG (10 )
20
10
10
15
10
11
12
20
-6
FG (10 )
50
10
0
0
10
15
10
11
12
50
-6
FG (10 )
20
10
10
15
10
11
12
20
-6
FG (10 )
50
10
0
0
10
15
10
11
12
50
-6
FG (10 )
20
10
10
15
10
11
12
20
50
10
0
0
10
15
10
11
12
50
20
10
-50 0
10
15
10
11
12
50
-6
FG (10 )
20
-50
15
20
50
-50
12
-50
10
-6
FG (10 )
50
-50
10
-50
20
50
-50
12
-6
FG (10 )
G (10-6)
G (10-6)
G (10-6)
G (10-6)
G (10-6)
G (10-6)
G (10-6)
11
-50
G (10-6)
10
50
-50
G (10-6)
15
-50
G (10-6)
10
50
-50
G (10-6)
-50
G (10-6)
50
-50
G01
10
-50
G (10-6)
20
50
-6
FG (10 )
G (10-6)
1312
10
10
t (s)
15
10
11
t (s)
12
f (Hz)
Fig. 6. Time histories of CF strain and amplitude spectra at various points for the case Pt 700 N and V 0.24 m/s.
0.6
80
75
70
65
60
55
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
V (m/s)
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
z/L
0.8
1.0
0.6
80
75
70
65
60
55
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0.5
V (m/s)
riser model in still water under all the tensions shown in Fig. 5. For
the sake of simplicity, they were calculated by Eq. (10) with an
assumption of the added mass ratio being 1.0.
1313
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
z/L
Fig. 7. RMS strains along the riser versus towing speed, Pt 700 N. (a) CF and (b) IL.
0.8
1.0
10 20 30 40 50
G05
FG (10-6)
120
90
60
30
0
10 20 30 40 50
G06
FG (10-6)
120
90
60
30
0
10 20 30 40 50
120
90
60
30
0
FG (10-6)
G07
10 20 30 40 50
f (Hz)
120
90
60
30
0
10 20 30 40 50
G11
120
90
60
30
0
10 20 30 40 50
G12
120
90
60
30
0
10 20 30 40 50
G13
10 20 30 40 50
120
90
60
30
0
G14
10 20 30 40 50
f (Hz)
120
90
60
30
0
10 20 30 40 50
G03
120
90
60
30
0
10 20 30 40 50
G04
120
90
60
30
0
10 20 30 40 50
G05
120
90
60
30
0
10 20 30 40 50
G06
10 20 30 40 50
120
90
60
30
0
G07
10 20 30 40 50
f (Hz)
FG (10-6)
10 20 30 40 50
G09
FG (10-6)
120
90
60
30
0
120
90
60
30
0
10 20 30 40 50
G10
FG (10-6)
FG (10-6)
FG (10-6)
FG (10-6)
G10
G02
FG (10-6)
10 20 30 40 50
10 20 30 40 50
25.3
120
90
60
30
0
10 20 30 40 50
G11
FG (10-6)
G04
G08
12.7
120
90
60
30
0
10 20 30 40 50
G12
FG (10-6)
10 20 30 40 50
120
90
60
30
0
120
90
60
30
0
120
90
60
30
0
120
90
60
30
0
10 20 30 40 50
G13
FG (10-6)
FG (10-6)
120
90
60
30
0
G09
12.7 25.3
FG (10-6)
G03
10 20 30 40 50
IL
G01
FG (10-6)
10 20 30 40 50
120
90
60
30
0
FG (10-6)
FG (10-6)
120
90
60
30
0
120
90
60
30
0
FG (10-6)
G02
FG (10-6)
10 20 30 40 50
31.7
FG (10-6)
6.4
19.0
FG (10-6)
31.7
IL
G08
FG (10-6)
19.0
120
90
60
30
0
FG (10-6)
FG (10-6)
6.4
FG (10-6)
120
90
60
30
0
CF
G01
FG (10-6)
CF
120
90
60
30
0
10 20 30 40 50
120
90
60
30
0
G14
FG (10-6)
1314
10 20 30 40 50
f (Hz)
Fig. 8. Amplitude spectra of response strains showing higher harmonic components at different positions along the riser for both CF and IL (Pt 700 N and V 0.57 m/s).
CF, 600 N
0.6
0.009
0.008
0.007
0.006
0.005
0.004
0.003
0.002
0.001
V (m/s)
0.5
0.4
0.3
8
Mode #
10
12
CF, 700 N
0.6
0.009
0.008
0.007
0.006
0.005
0.004
0.003
0.002
0.001
0.4
0.3
8
Mode #
10
12
14
IL, 700 N
0.009
0.008
0.007
0.006
0.005
0.004
0.003
0.002
0.001
0.5
V (m/s)
V (m/s)
14
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.2
2
8
Mode #
10
12
14
CF, 800 N
0.6
0.4
0.3
0.2
8
Mode #
10
12
14
IL, 800 N
0.009
0.008
0.007
0.006
0.005
0.004
0.003
0.002
0.001
0.5
V (m/s)
0.009
0.008
0.007
0.006
0.005
0.004
0.003
0.002
0.001
0.5
V (m/s)
0.4
0.2
2
0.6
0.009
0.008
0.007
0.006
0.005
0.004
0.003
0.002
0.001
0.3
0.2
0.6
IL, 600 N
0.5
V (m/s)
0.6
1315
0.4
0.3
0.2
8
Mode #
10
12
14
8
Mode #
10
12
14
20
20
CF,600 N
IL,600 N
CF,700 N
IL,700 N
CF,800 N
IL,800 N
16
Dominant frequency (Hz)
Dominant mode
15
CF,600 N
IL,600 N
CF,700 N
IL,700 N
CF,800 N
IL,800 N
10
12
1 fst
2 fst
0.2
0.3
0.4
V (m/s)
0.5
0.6
0.2
0.3
0.4
V (m/s)
0.5
0.6
1316
2
FG /D
AG /D
2
0
-2
10
15
10
10.5
FG /D
10
15
10
10.5
10
15
10
10.5
10
15
10
10.5
AG /D
FG /D
0
10
15
10
10.5
AG /D
FG /D
0
10
15
10
10.5
FG /D
15
10
10.5
10
15
10
10.5
10
15
10
10.5
10
15
10
10.5
AG /D
FG /D
0
10
15
10
10.5
FG /D
5
10
15
10
10.5
10
15
20 25
G05
10
15
20 25
G06
10
15
20 25
G07
10
15
20 25
G08
10
15
20 25
G09
10
15
20 25
G10
10
15
20 25
G11
10
15
20 25
G12
10
15
20 25
G13
10
15
10
10.5
10
15
20 25
G14
10 15
f (Hz)
1
0
11
2
FG /D
AG /D
AG /D
1
0
11
2
FG /D
2
AG /D
0
-2
20 25
G04
1
0
11
-2
15
10
1
0
11
-2
1
0
11
-2
1
0
11
FG /D
0
-2
20 25
G03
1
0
11
FG /D
10
FG /D
AG /D
AG /D
AG /D
2
AG /D
-2
15
10
1
0
11
-2
1
0
11
-2
20 25
G02
-2
15
1
0
11
-2
10
1
0
11
0
-2
1
0
11
FG /D
0
-2
AG /D
FG /D
AG /D
AG /D
0
-2
1
0
11
G01
10
t (s)
15
10
10.5
t (s)
11
1
0
Fig. 12. CF displacement history and its spectrum at positions G01G14 along the riser, Pt 700 N and V 0.57m/s.
20
25
1317
1.5
3.0
600 N
700 N
800 N
600 N
700 N
800 N
1.0
Amax/D
Amax/D
2.0
0.5
1.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
V (m/s)
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
V (m/s)
0.5
0.6
0.7
Fig. 13. Maxima of response amplitude (Amax/D) versus current velocity. (a) CF and (b) IL.
1.5
1.0
M03
M04
M05
M06
0.6
0.5
Aw/D
wn/D
0.8
M03
M04
M05
M06
0.4
0.0
0.2
-0.5
-1.0
0.0
2.0
2.5
3.0
t (s)
3.5
4.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
f (Hz)
5.0
Fig. 14. Histories (a) and amplitude spectra (b) of modal weights of the excited modes in CF, Pt 700 N and V 0.30 m/s.
6.0
1318
0.8
0.8
0.6
0.6
Aw/D
Aw/D
3.4Hz
2.7Hz
0.4
M02
M03
M04
M05
0.2
0.0
1.0
M03
M04
M05
M06
0.2
0.0
2.0
3.0
f (Hz)
4.0
5.0
2.0
0.8
3.0
4.0
f (Hz)
5.0
6.0
0.8
M04
M05
M06
M07
0.6
Aw/D
0.6
Aw/D
0.4
0.4
5.4Hz
0.2
0.4
6.6Hz
M05
M06
M07
M08
0.2
0.0
3.0
0.0
4.0
5.0
f (Hz)
6.0
7.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
f (Hz)
8.0
9.0
Fig. 15. Multi-mode response in CF direction, Pt 700 N. (a) V 0.24 m/s, Pt 700 N, (b) V 0.30 m/s, Pt 700 N, (c) V 0.48 m/s, Pt 700 N and (d) V 0.60 m/s, Pt 700 N.
0.3
0.3
M04
M05
M06
M07
5.3Hz
0.1
0.2
Aw/D
Aw/D
0.2
M06
M07
M08
M09
0.1
6.8Hz
0.0
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
4.0
8.0
6.0
f (Hz)
8.0
10.0
f (Hz)
0.3
0.3
M09
M10
M11
M12
0.2
Aw/D
Aw/D
0.2
M11
M12
M13
M14
10.4Hz
0.1
0.0
8.0
10.0
12.0
f (Hz)
13.2Hz
0.1
14.0
0.0
10.0
12.0
14.0
16.0
f (Hz)
Fig. 16. Multi-mode response in IL direction, Pt 700 N. (a) V 0.24 m/s, Pt 700 N, (b) V 0.30 m/s, Pt 700 N, (c) V 0.48 m/s, Pt 700 N and (d) V 0.60 m/s, Pt 700 N.
0.0
0.0
1.0
V = 0.42m/s
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.5
z/L
1.0
0.5
z/L
1.0
V = 0.48m/s
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.5
z/L
0.5
0.0
0.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
V = 0.30m/s
Astd /D
1.0
0.5
11
V = 0.24m/s
0.0
0.0
1.0
Astd /D
Astd /D
1.0
0.5
z/L
s
Z
1 T
Astd zm
yzm ,tyzm ,t2 dt
T 0
Astd /D
0.5
Astd /D
1.0
V = 0.18m/s
Astd /D
Astd /D
1.0
0.5
z/L
0.0
0.0
0.5
z/L
0.5
1.0
V = 0.54m/s
0.5
V = 0.36m/s
0.0
0.0
1.0
Astd /D
1319
1.0
Fig. 17. Spatial distribution of the standard deviation of temporal displacement for CF.
0.5
z/L
1.0
V = 0.60m/s
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.5
z/L
1.0
1320
Mode 4
Mode 3
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
z/L
Fig. 18. Spatial distribution of Astd/D of a single-mode response.
= 0.5
= 1.0
= 2.0
Astd/D
2.0
1.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
z/L
Fig. 19. Spatial distribution of Astd/D with different values of l (b 1 and y 0).
y3,4 z,t
4
X
n3
A4 sino4 t ysin
4pz
L
2.0
3pz
L
1.0
0.5
12
= 1.0
= 2/3
= 1.5
= 2.0
=1
1.5
Astd/D
the same amplitude and the phase lag is zero. It can be seen that
the spatial distributions of Astd/D of two modes with different
frequencies are symmetric with respect to the middle point of
z/L0.5, and thought there are no shape nodes (Astd/D 0) except
for those at two ends of the riser, while the case of b 1.0 is
indeed identical to the case of l 1.0 plotted in Fig. 19. In
addition, it can be observed that the largest amplitude of b 1.0
is greater than those of two modes with different frequencies. In
another view, the multi-mode response involving modes with the
same response frequency can be interpreted as a new singlemode response, which behaves a new mode shape different from
the normal sine mode shape.
Third, Fig. 21 shows the dependence on y of the variation of
Astd/D with z/L as l 1 and b 1. It can be observed that the
location of the largest response depends greatly on the phase lag
between the involved modes. Particularly with the present
assumptions of identical mode amplitudes and frequencies, the
largest response amplitude occurs on the left part of the riser
when 0 o y o p/2 and 3p/2o y o2p, while it occurs on the right
half part as p/2o y o3p/2. The response is found to be symmetric
along the rise at y p/2 and y 3p/2. In addition, Fig. 21 also
indicates that there are no nodes (Astd/D 0) except for those of
two ends of the riser if y is not equal to 0 or p.
In this section we focused on the problem of asymmetrical
variation of the standard deviation of displacement for CF along
the riser model and explained the physical mechanism behind this
phenomenon by means of theoretical analysis. It was revealed
clearly that the asymmetry of the bare pipe response in uniform
ow mainly resulted from the modal composition of multi-modal
VIV with different modal amplitudes, modal frequencies and the
phase lags between the involved modes.
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
z/L
Fig. 20. Spatial distribution of Astd/D with different values of b (l 1 and y 0).
2.0
= 0.0
= /2
=
= 3/2
1.5
Astd/D
Astd/D
1.0
1.0
0.5
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
z/L
Fig. 21. Spatial distribution of Astd/D with different values of y (l 1, and b 1).
smean
1321
M
1 X
A z
M i 1 std i
13
14
1rirM
0.7
0.4
600 N
700 N
800 N
600 N
700 N
800 N
0.3
mean/D
0.6
mean/D
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
0.2
-0.1
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4 0.5
V (m/s)
0.6
0.7
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4 0.5
V (m/s)
0.6
0.7
Fig. 22. Spatial mean of temporal displacement standard deviation. (a) CF and (b) IL.
max/D
0.6
600 N
700 N
800 N
0.4
max/D
1.2
0.8
0.2
0.0
0.6
0.4
0.1
600 N
700 N
800 N
0.2
0.3
0.4 0.5
V (m/s)
0.6
0.7
-0.2
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4 0.5
V (m/s)
0.6
Fig. 23. Spatial maximum of temporal displacement standard deviation. (a) CF and (b) IL.
0.7
1322
It was revealed that the asymmetrical distribution of displacement mainly resulted from the modal composition of multimodal VIV with different modal amplitudes, modal frequencies
and the phase lags between the involved modes.
Higher harmonics of the VIV response such as the third, fourth
and fth vibration components were observed in this laboratory
experiment of the long exible pipe. These higher harmonic components are excited simultaneously as the fundamental component. In
addition, the higher harmonics are steady over the entire duration of
the test even if they varied along the length of the riser pipe. It is
believed that the higher harmonics contribute signicantly to the
fatigue damage due to their high vibration frequencies.
Acknowledgments
This work was mainly supported by the National High-Tech
Research and Development Program (863 Program) of China
with Grant no. 2006AA09A103. This work was also partially
supported by the program from NSFC of China with Grant no.
50921001 and the open fund from SLCOE with Grant no. LP0904.
The authors appreciate greatly Dr. Ren Liang at Dalian University
of Technology for his kind help with ber optic strain gages.
References
Bearman, P.W., 1984. Vortex shedding from oscillating bluff bodies. Annual
Review of Fluid Mechanics 16, 195222.
Braaten, H., Lie, H., Skaugset, K., 2008. Higher order modal instability of riser
fairings. In: Proceedings of the Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
Conference, Lisbon, OMAE, p. 57971.
Chaplin, J.R., Bearman, P.W., Cheng, Y., Fontaine, E., Graham, J.M.R., Herfjord, K.,
Huera-Huarte, F.J., Isherwood, M., Lambrakos, K., Larsen, C.M., Meneghini, J.R.,
Moe, G., Pattenden, R.J., Triantafyllou, M.S., Willden, R.H.J., 2005. Blind
predictions of laboratory measurements of vortex-induced vibrations of a
tension riser. Journal of Fluids and Structures 21, 2540.
Farrant, T., Tan, M., Price, W.G., 2001. A cell boundary element method applied to
laminar vortex shedding from circular cylinders. Computers & Fluids 30
(2001), 211236.
Govardhan, R., Williamson, C.H.K., 2000. Modes of vortex formation and frequency
response for a freely-vibrating cylinder. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 420,
85130.
Grifn, O.M., Ramberg, S.E., 1982. Some recent studies of vortex shedding with
application to marine tubulars and risers. Journal of Energy Resources
TechnologyASME 104, 213.
Huera-Huarte, F.J., Bearman, P.W., 2009. Wake structures and vortex-induced
vibrations of a long exible cylinderpart 1. Dynamic response. Journal of
Fluids and Structures 25 (6), 969990.
Huse, E., Kleiven, G., Nielsen, F.G., 1998. Large scale model testing of deep sea
risers. Proc Offshore Tech Conf, Houston, Paper OTC, 8701.
Jauvtis, N., Williamson, C.H.K., 2004. The effect of two degrees of freedom on
vortex-induced vibration at low mass ratio. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 509,
2362.
Jin, W., Zhou, Y., Chan, P.K.C., Xu, H.G., 2000. A bre-optic grating sensor for the
study of ow-induced vibrations. Sensors and Actuators 79, 3645.
Lie, H., Kaasen, K.E., 2006. Modal analysis of measurements from a large-scale VIV
model test of a riser in linearly sheared ow. Journal of Fluids and Structures
22, 557575.
Lie, H., Mo, K., Vandiver, J.K., 1998. VIV model test of a bare- and a staggered
buoyancy riser in a rotating rig. In: Proceedings of the Offshore Technology
Conference, Houston, Texas, USA, OTC, p. 8700.
Marcollo, H., Chaurasia, H., Vandiver, J.K., 2007. Phenomena observed in VIV bare
riser eld tests. In: Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on
Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, OMAE2007-29562, June 1015,
2007, San Diego, California, USA.
Park, H.I., Hong, Y.P., Nakamura, M., Koterayama, W., 2004. Experimental study on
vortex induced vibrations of highly exible immersed pipe subjected to top
end oscillations. Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal and Ocean Engineering
ASCE 130 (4), 207214.
Parkinson, G.V., 1989. Phenomena and modeling of ow-induced vibrations of
bluff bodies. Progress in Aerospace Sciences 26, 169224.
Ren, L., Li, H.N., Zhou, J., Sun, L., Li, D.S., 2006. Application of tube-packaged FBG
strain sensor in vibration experiment of submarine pipeline model. China
Ocean Engineering 20 (1), 155164.
Sarpkaya, T., 1979. Vortex-induced oscillations. Journal of Applied Mechanics
ASME 46, 241258.
Sarpkaya, T., 2004. A critical review of the intrinsic nature of vortex-induced
vibrations. Journal of Fluids and Structures 19, 389447.
Song, J.N., Lu, L., Zhang, J.Q., Wu, H., Tang, G.Q., Li, G.W., Teng, B., Zhao, R.H., 2009.
Experimental investigation of suppression of vortex-induced vibration of
marine risers by three control rods. The Ocean Engineering 27, 2329 in
Chinese.
Swithenbank, S.B., Vandiver, J.K., Larsen, C.M., Lie, H., 2008. Reynolds number
dependence of exible cylinder VIV response data. In: Proceedings of the
Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering Conference, Estoril, Portugal,
OMAE, 2008, p. 57045.
Timoshenko, S., Young, D.H., Weaver, W., 1974. Vibration Problems in Engineering,
fourth ed. Wiley, New York.
Tognarelli, M.A., Slocum, S.T., Frank, W.R., Campbell, R.B., 2004.VIV Response of a
long exible cylinder in uniform and linearly sheared currents. In: Proceedings
of the Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, Texas, USA, OTC 16338.
Trim, A.D., Braaten, H., Lie, H., Tognarelli, M.A., 2005. Experimental investigation of
vortex-induced vibration of long marine risers. Journal of Fluids and Structures
21, 335361.
Vandiver, J.K., 1993. Dimensionless parameters important to the prediction of
vortex-induced vibration of long, exible cylinders in ocean currents. Journal
of Fluids and Structures 7, 423455.
Vandiver, J.K., Marcollo, H., Swithenbank, S., Jhingran, V., 2005. High mode number
vortex-induced vibration eld experiments. In: Proceedings of the Offshore
Technology Conference, Houston, Texas, USA OTC, p. 17383.
Vandiver, J.K., Jaiswal, V., Jhingran, V., 2009. Insights on vortex-induced, traveling
waves on long risers. Journal of Fluids and Structures 25, 641653.
Vandiver, J.K., Swithenbank, S.B., Jaiswal, V., Jhingran, V., 2006 . Fatigue damage
from high mode number vortex-induced vibration. In: Proceedings of the
Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering Conference, Hamburg, Germany,
OMAE, 2006, p. 92409.
Willden, R.H.J., Graham, J.M.R., 2004. Multi-modal Vortex-Induced Vibrations of a
vertical riser pipe subject to a uniform current prole. European Journal of
Mechanics B/Fluids 23, 209218.
Williamson, C.H.K., Govardhan, R., 2004. Vortex-induced vibrations. Annual
Review of Fluid Mechanics 36, 413455.
Williamson, C.H.K., Govardhan, R., 2008. A brief review of recent results in vortexinduced vibrations. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics
96, 713735.