Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
CODEN FIZBE7
Apparent and inherent optical properties of all but the clearest natural waters are to
a large extent determined by suspended particles. The optical properties of these particulates, especially those related to light scattering, are strongly influenced by the particle-size
distribution (PSD) and composition.
e-mail address: martinis@thphys.irb.hr
65
Particulate matter in the sea consists of two basic types: biogenic and terrigenous,
characterized by different scattering properties. Abundances and relative concentrations of
both vary considerably, and their dimensions can range from less than one micrometer to
many micrometers [1]. Most terrigenous particles are small [2], whereas biogenic particles are usually large. Recent investigations also reveal the presence of a large number of
biogenic particles in sub-micron range [3,4], which could be the source of aggregation.
To study the fractal structure of the seawater scatterers, we have analysed data from 34
static light scattering (SLS) experiments performed in various types of seawater [5,6,7].
Fig. 1. Intensity of light scattering from suspended sea particles showing different regions
with the power-law behaviour. The data are from Ref. 7.
The log-log plot of typical data is shown in Fig. 1. It shows a dependence of the
total scattering intensity on the magnitude of the scattering vector . We observe two
different regions in which is likely to exhibit a power-law behaviour of the type
:
For m "! , we find # $%&'#
For m "!*)+) , m "! , we find
(
$%&- ,
For in the region between # .0/1 -
m "! , goes through its minimum value. This
region is dominated by the behaviour of the scattering intensity 2 of a single particle
in the cluster.
Although the identification of two linear regimes in Fig. 1 may not be so obvious, a
close look at Fig. 2, giving the 3 4 5 dependence of
9 3 4 5
% 78/ 9 3 4 5;:
6
66
clearly shows that there exist two different regions in which <= > ? behaves as a constant.
We consider the power-law behaviour for @= > ? over the above indicated range of > as a
possible signature of a fractal structure of suspended scatterers in seawater.
>?
as a function of A B
C>
There is now substantial evidence that aggregates formed from coagulation processes
possess fractal structures. Computer simulations of aggregate growth [8,9,10] and experimental studies [11,12,13] indicate that the magnitude of the fractal dimension is closely
related to the mechanism of aggregate growth. Aggregates formed through particle-cluster
aggregation have fractal dimensions in the range <EDGF H IJLK H M [13], whereas clustercluster aggregation results in lower dimensions, typically <ND8O H PQJRF H F [14].
Depending on the particle stickiness, two different regimes of aggregation, resulting in
different fractal dimensions, can be distinguished: diffusion-limited collodial aggregation
(DLCA) [13] with a typical fractal dimension of around 1.8 and reaction-limited collodial
aggregation (RLCA) with a fractal dimension of around 2.1 [15]. This suggests that the
fractal dimension could be used to identify the aggregate formation mechanism as well
as the stickiness (collision efficiency) of aggregating particles. However, the situation in
seawater is far more complicated owing to the great polydispersity in sizes, shapes and
properties of aggregating particles.
In this Letter, we show that the observed > dependence of the scattering intensity, @= > ? ,
for suspended particles in seawater can be explained if the scattering medium consists of a
mixture of two kinds of particles.
Let ST= UQ? dU denote the number of clusters per unit scattering volume with radii between U and U+V dU . Then, in the dilute regime excluding multiple scattering, the total
FIZIKA B 7 (1998) 2, 6572
67
(1)
where
denotes the intensity of scattering from a cluster of size . The total number
of clusters per unit volume is
(2)
_Qef g
_*e h i
Integration
the size variable is usually performed between
and
, where
_Qef g (_Qeh over
i ) denotes
the minimal (maximal) size of the clusters that
contribute
to light
d
_on
_
scattering. For suspended particles in seawater, the relevant range of is j j kl m m
k j j l m [16].
`TX _QZ by a one-parameter hyMost authors model the sea-particle size distributions
perbolic distribution [17,18] of the type
(3)
`f X _QZ
p f
`TX _QZ
[L`+}X _QZ0~T` X _QZ[Lp}0_Q "X y*x w _* Z"~p_Q "X y k _* "Z ^ (4)
}
where and
arep the
parameters of the distribution related to the average size of the
p
}
are
cluster, and
and
constants related to the concentration of the respective components. The model is in good agreement with all measured PSD data [16].
Although both components contribute in the whole considered size range, the component is dominant for small sizes and the component for large sizes, as shown in Fig.
3.
68
L " *
(5)
(6)
where
and average relative indices of refraction for - and -component material (1.8 and 1.09,
respectively) [16]. Q is obtained from the Mie theory for a spherical scatterer of size
.
Q T Q ; Q T Q
where Q 1L
(7)
69
QT
m. Note that
Q8
0* 0
* 0*
6] 0Q " 01 + 0 0
70
FIZIKA B 7 (1998) 2, 6572
for large -values can be associated with cluster-cluster aggregation due to differential
sedimentation and shear particle-cluster aggregation, respectively.
always depends on a product of Q and , one of
Since the measured
these
two functions is usually arbitrary. Thus having the independent measurement of
Q in Eq. (1), we can in principle determine the Q from the data using the method
of deconvolution. However, owing to large uncertainties in the method of deconvolution
and without a concrete physical model, it is difficult to see how the data alone could provide
definitive evidence for fractal structure of scatterers in seawater.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Ministry of Science of Croatia. The authors would
also like to thank the referees for useful comments.
References
1) R. W. Sheldon, A. Prakash and W. H. Sutcliffe Jr., Limnology and Oceanography 17 (1972) 327;
2) J. E. Harris, Deep-Sea Research 24 (1977) 1055;
3) A. R. Longhurst et al., Deep-Sea Research 39 (1992) 1; M. E. Sieracki and C. L. Viles, Deep-Sea
Research 39 (1992) 1919;
4) D. Stramski and D. A. Keifer, Annual ASLO meeting, June 1991, Halifax, NS; A. Morel and Y.-H.
Ahn, J. Marine Res. 49 (1991) 179;
5) G. Kullenberg, Deep-Sea Research 31 (1984) 295; A. Morel, NATO AGARD Lecture Series,
Optics of the Sea, No. 61 (1973) 1;
6) D. Risovic and M. Martinis, J. Coll. Interface Sci. 182 (1996) 199;
7) T. J. Petzold, Volume scattering functions for selected ocean waters, Scrips Inst. of Oceanography
La Jolla , California SIO Ref. 72 28 (1972) p. 79;
8) P. Meakin and F. Family, Phys. Rev. A 36 (1987) 5498;
9) R. D. Mountain and G. W. Mulholand, Langmuir 4 (1988) 1321;
10) J. F. Dirkse and J. D. Cawley, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 170 (1995) 466;
11) D. A. Weitz and M. Y. Lin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57 (1986) 2037;
12) J. E. Martin, Phys. Rev. A 36 (1987) 3415;
13) P. Meakin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51 (1983) 1119; M. Kolb, R. Botet and R. Jullien, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51
(1983) 1123; D. W. Schaefer, Science 243 (1989) 1023;
14) T. A. Witten and M. E. Cates, Science 232 (1986) 1607;
15) R. Jullien and M. Kolb, J. Phys. A 17 (1984) L639; P. Meakin, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 28
(1988) 249;
FIZIKA B 7 (1998) 2, 6572
71
CESTICA
72