Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Home
About Us
Contact Us
The public image of a corporation will quite accurately reflect the culture of that
body. It follows, then, that good corporate governance has to be in the bones and
bloodstream of the organisation since this in turn will be reflected in the culture.
To carry the analogy further, in the same way that healthy blood and bones are
reflected in the naturally healthy look of a person, so an organisation whose
internal functions are healthy will naturally look so from an external perspective.
Our Golden Rules of best corporate governance practice are like a health manual
for your organisation and come with a practical diagnosis and treatment
programme which we set out in our new Corporate Governance Course, a series of
ebooks delivered over 6 days by email. The first ebook, an introduction to
corporate governance and the ACG methodology, is available free of charge simply subscribe to this site to receive your copy (see the form at the top right of
the page).
* indicates required
Email Address
Business Ethics
Strategic Management
First/Given Name
Definitions
Corporate Governance
Last Name
Business Ethics
Strategic Management
Leadership
Accountability
Stewardship
Whistleblowing
Implementation
Importance of Corporate
governance
Best Practice
Governance and Research
Training
Corporate Governance
Training
The ACG eBook Manual
[?]Subscribe To This Site
Subscribe
From the above examples, we can draw some conclusions and formulate a short
set of rules regarding best corporate governance practice. All the goodies, to a
great degree, abided by these rules. All the baddies to a large extent ignored
them. The principles underlying these rules are:
ethical approach - culture, society; organisational paradigm
balanced objectives - congruence of goals of all interested parties
each party plays his part - roles of key players: owners/directors/staff
decision-making process in place - reflecting the first three principles and
giving due weight to all stakeholders
5. equal concern for all stakeholders - albeit some have greater weight than
others
6. accountability and transparency - to all stakeholders
1.
2.
3.
4.
Hence, with due respect to Milton Friedman who is quoted as believing that the
social responsibility of business begins and ends with increasing profit, we
contend that running the business successfully is not simply about market
domination and shareholder value.
And best corporate governance practice is not simply about a battle between
distant, disloyal institutional shareholders and greedy directors but about the
ethos of the organisation and fulfilling its clearly agreed goals.
These goals may be set by the entrepreneur who starts the business, but they are
accepted by all parties as being high-minded and in everyones interests. This is
notwithstanding the fact that some parties have bigger stakes and some benefit
more than others. And, of course, different parties want different things from the
company. There has to be, therefore, a process of identifying the different needs
and, as much as possible, harmonising them. This is the starting point for the
smooth running of the business. Once dissonance in the common goal creeps in the
danger of the standard of corporate governance deteriorating rises steadily.
Clearly external regulation can only play a limited part in ensuring that such a
deep-seated and beneficial culture as that described above exists. Equally clearly,
however, the task of ensuring this desirable state and adhering to best corporate
governance practice belongs to the various stakeholders, who can and should,
through their proper participation, bring this about.
matter how small, is given the opportunity to express a view, through the
continuous monitoring of stakeholder perceptions. It is key to the approach that
organisations truly respect the minority interests. Like the spirit of the US
constitution, the approach can be said to embrace liberty, equality and
community, but like the US economy, it aspires to produce the most powerful and
effective result in the world.
Pressures on a Company
It is important that a wide perspective is taken when considering corporate
governance because we cannot emphasise too strongly our belief that good
management practices, as described in the rest of this section of the website, will
deliver good corporate governance. Compliance with checklists of regulations and
codes, in the setting of bad management or a lack of commitment to good
management, will NOT deliver good corporate governance. The longer term
consequences of this externally-applied regulatory approach will be a progressive
introduction of more and more rules which are held in less and less regard, and
which produce less and less effect.
The result benefits neither business nor its customers, and has only served to
spawn a growing industry of specialist advisers in corporate governance and lobby
groups. It has also failed to prevent more and bigger corporate failures. So while
the most of the provisions of the various Codes of Conduct could certainly be
considered best corporate governance practice - or at least good corporate
governance, if they are imposed externally and not truly bought into by every part
of the company and its stakeholders, and monitored effectively, there will always
be those who try - and succeed - in hiding from or bending the rules.
As Professor Sir George Bain once said to us, the big advantage of the shareholder
model over the stakeholder model in management terms is the simple goal it
presents: maximise shareholder value. No such simple target attaches to the
stakeholder approach, and yet without a clear goal, management faces an
impossible task in trying to do its job properly - what exactly is its job?
In our experience of working with and observing management over the past thirty
years in all kinds of situations, from the leaders of some of the largest companies
in the world to the owner/managers of small entrepreneurial businesses, a general
rule stands out. The governance, the goals and the strategy of a business must be
compatible, and there must be congruence between the expectations of the
various interested parties. Clearly, in defining best corporate governance
practice, this means that:
there is a common view as to the ethic by which the business is conducted
the views of all interested parties are taken into account when deciding the
goal
an appropriate weighting is given to those views to arrive at a conclusion as
to how to achieve the greatest good
a strategy is formulated to attain the chosen goal which takes account of
the likely behaviour of the various interest groups
an implementation programme is drawn up which makes the necessary
organisational arrangements to fulfil the strategy and to protect the
interests of the various stakeholders
the implementation programme includes reporting systems which ensure
transparency and regular feedback on matters which affect them to the
various stakeholders
Much of this website is therefore devoted to the process whereby a board, and the
main stakeholders, can ensure that the company complies with the Five Golden
Rules of best corporate governance practice.
Now read about the Golden Rules in detail:
Rule 1:
Rule 2:
Rule 3:
Rule 4:
Rule 5:
SBI!