Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Association
Earthing & Bonding of
Telecommunications
Installations and
Colocation Systems
Worldwide Building
Earthing Arrangements:
A Case Study and Issues
Affecting the Designer
Contents
1
INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................... 1
2.1
2.1.1
2.1.2
2.2
SYSTEM CURRENTS DIVIDING BETWEEN THE NEUTRAL AND EARTHING SYSTEM .................. 6
3.1
Three pole and four pole circuit breakers in dual supplies .................................................... 6
3.1.1
3.1.2
3.1.3
3.2
The UPS output neutral is directly connected to the UPS input neutral. ............................... 9
4.2
4.3
Mike Hastings
BEng (Hons), CEng, MIEE, MPhil
Chris J Hewitt
BEng (Hons), CEng, MIEE
INTRODUCTION
This paper has been written so as to outline the fundamental considerations when designing building
earth systems. The paper particularly relates to the design of building earth systems specifically in
mission critical facilities such as data centres.
The authors have experienced a number of building installations where fundamental design problems
have exist in the earthing arrangements. The paper is not intended to address the issues of earthing
within technical or server spaces where the object is to create a low impendance path for high
frequency leakage currents. Instead, the paper presents more fundamental arrangements upstream of
the technical space where earth connections are more important to the overall safe operation of the
building with minimal supply interruption.
The paper concentrates on the following:
Neutral current paths, presenting a case study where neutral current was allowed to divide
between the neutral and earth conductor systems. The following mitigating measures are
discussed:
In addition, the paper presents two methods for earthing uninterruptible power supply systems, one for
a more simple single sources system, and one for a more complex multiple sources system.
Throughout the paper, it is emphasised that distribution systems must be designed as a single entities
and therefore.
Arup
C:\ARUP\ADMINISTRATION\MCF\PAPERS\AVAILABLE FOR ISSUE\EARTHING\ARUP - 2002 EARTHING AND BONDING OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS INSTALLATIONS AND COLO SYSTEMS
WORLDWIDE.DOC
2.
In general, metalwork that may become live during normal use or during a fault should be bonded to
the protective earthing system. The protective earthing system must therefore be bonded at some
point to the technical earthing system (if present). Technical earthing systems are not specifically
designed to clear earth fault currents (although by their nature they may be capable of performing this
function). Instead, they are designed to provide a high integrity, low impendance path to earth for high
frequency leakage currents and noise caused by the operation of switch mode power supplies.
As an example, for a server rack containing 8no. industry standard 2U servers, the leakage current
can typically be 10mA 20mA.. Clearly in the UK, compliance with the requirements of Section 607 of
BS 7671 is imperative for safety of personnel.
In general, the star points of the secondary winding of a distribution transformer, low voltage generator
or UPS inverters are normally solidly earthed. Solidly earthing the neutral point ensures that voltages
to earth will not exceed the phase voltage. If several sources are installed, regulations and practices
allow each transformer neutral connection to be taken to a common earthing bar; separate earth
electrodes are not required.
In broad terms, distribution systems are earthed for the following reasons:
To limit voltages due to impressed surges (including lightning) and faults giving a measure of
safety to personnel.
Arup
C:\ARUP\ADMINISTRATION\MCF\PAPERS\AVAILABLE FOR ISSUE\EARTHING\ARUP - 2002 EARTHING AND BONDING OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS INSTALLATIONS AND COLO SYSTEMS
WORLDWIDE.DOC
2.1
Earthing Systems
2.1.1
Typically, technical earthing systems are subject to high frequency earth leakage currents of up to
30MHz. As the frequency increases, the distribution of current across the cross section of an earth
conductor becomes less uniform. Consequently, impedance of the earthing system increases. This
phenomenon is known as skin effects. It is possible to calculate the effect on the cable impendance of
skin effect by using equations indicated in IEC287. Typically, to mitigate the cause of skin effects it is
suggested that the technical earth system is designed to incorporate many parallel paths.
2.1.2
2.1.2.1
TT systems have independent earthing system for the source earth and protective earth.
Arup
C:\ARUP\ADMINISTRATION\MCF\PAPERS\AVAILABLE FOR ISSUE\EARTHING\ARUP - 2002 EARTHING AND BONDING OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS INSTALLATIONS AND COLO SYSTEMS
WORLDWIDE.DOC
2.1.2.2
TNS systems use a single earth system for both the source earth and protective earth. Earth fault
currents will be of a similar magnitude to a phase fault. The high fault currents will ensure minimum
circuit disconnection times. Therefore, it is not normally necessary to install earth fault protection.
Arup
C:\ARUP\ADMINISTRATION\MCF\PAPERS\AVAILABLE FOR ISSUE\EARTHING\ARUP - 2002 EARTHING AND BONDING OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS INSTALLATIONS AND COLO SYSTEMS
WORLDWIDE.DOC
2.2
Fault current paths from the position of the fault comprise protective conductors and other random
paths in parallel, such as structural metalwork. Calculations must be based on the actual known
conductors, including sheaths and circuit protective conductors, and cannot make allowance for
fortuitous parallel paths.
Earth faults occurring at main switchboards close to the transformer will develop high currents, most of
which will return to the transformer star point via main bonding conductors.
Earthing conductors are sized in accordance to adiabatic conditions and to ensure the earth loop
impedance is low enough to operate the protective device in the event of an earth fault. Overload
protection is omitted, since the earthing conductors are not intending to carry steady state current
during normal operation
The adiabatic formula can be used:
Equation 3.3
Where
S = Cross-sectional area of conductor (mm2). Standard size conductors should be chosen.
I = r.m.s. fault current (amps) (ignoring current limiting by the circuit protective conductor).
t = Disconnection time for operation of the circuit protective device (seconds). For disconnection
longer than five seconds, equation is pessimistic.
k = A factor related to initial and final temperature of the earthing conductors, conductor and insulation
materials. (For copper PVC cables, bunched k=115)
Arup
C:\ARUP\ADMINISTRATION\MCF\PAPERS\AVAILABLE FOR ISSUE\EARTHING\ARUP - 2002 EARTHING AND BONDING OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS INSTALLATIONS AND COLO SYSTEMS
WORLDWIDE.DOC
Three pole + solid neutral (TP+N) circuit breakers have been installed when four pole circuit
breaks should have been used.
3.1
Four pole switchgear is required for any three phase four wire systems with multiple infeeds, whether
these infeeds be transformer, generators or a combination of the two.
The correct installation for a multiple infeed switchboard would be to install 4 pole circuit breakers on
the incoming feeds (transformers and generators) and any bus-couples.
Additionally, if there are any auto-changeover devices down-stream of the main switchboard, these
should be 4 pole.
3.1.1
The three pole circuit breaker situation is shown in the two figures 4.1.1.1 and 4.1.1.2, which shows,
the neutral current will divide between the neutral and earth conductors.
Arup
C:\ARUP\ADMINISTRATION\MCF\PAPERS\AVAILABLE FOR ISSUE\EARTHING\ARUP - 2002 EARTHING AND BONDING OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS INSTALLATIONS AND COLO SYSTEMS
WORLDWIDE.DOC
Figure 4.1.1.2 Neutral current dividing between the earthing system and neutral conductors
3.1.2
This division of the neutral current could be prevented, if the bus section circuit breaker and the
transformer circuit breakers are four pole. The four pole circuit breaker situation is shown in the two
figures 4.1.2.1 and 4.1.2.2.
Arup
C:\ARUP\ADMINISTRATION\MCF\PAPERS\AVAILABLE FOR ISSUE\EARTHING\ARUP - 2002 EARTHING AND BONDING OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS INSTALLATIONS AND COLO SYSTEMS
WORLDWIDE.DOC
Figure 4.1.2.2 Neutral current does not dividing between the earthing system and neutral conductors
3.1.3
It can be seen that the only circuit configurations that eliminates the divided neutral current problem is
utilising four pole circuit breakers with the neutral to earth connection up stream of the incoming of the
circuit breaker.
3.2
Where distribution systems are modified to increase the system capacity or during the installation of
UPS, it is common to inadvertently introduce additional earth-neutral connections. If there are
additional earth-neutral connections downstream of the main earth neutral connection, parallel neutral
paths are created via the earthing system.
During a recent site survey, substantial currents were found to be following in the earth system of a
telecommunications facility. It was noted that the earth current was varying as the building electrical
load changed. Visual inspections established that the star point of transformer was directly earthed
and four pole circuit breaker were used throughout the system. When reviewing the current flow within
the earthing system, the only feasible source of the earth current was due to a second earth neutral
link in the newly installed sub-switchboard.
Without shutting down the switchboard, it was not possible to physically verify the presence of the
earth neutral links within the sub-switchboard. Therefore, as built drawings were obtained from the
manufacturer. These confirmed that the earth neutral links were installed in the switchboard.
Arup
C:\ARUP\ADMINISTRATION\MCF\PAPERS\AVAILABLE FOR ISSUE\EARTHING\ARUP - 2002 EARTHING AND BONDING OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS INSTALLATIONS AND COLO SYSTEMS
WORLDWIDE.DOC
The UPS output neutral is directly connected to the UPS input neutral.
Isolation transformer.
4.1
This solution is ideal for simple networks with only one source, as the neutral can be solid (i.e. not
switched) throughout the entire system. Consequently, four pole circuit breakers cannot be used
upstream of the UPS.
Figure 5.1 Schematic of a UPS system were the output neutral is directly connected to the UPS input
neutral
4.2
Isolation transformer
Where distribution systems incorporate two or more electrical sources, four pole circuits have to be
utilised for reasons previously discussed. In this case, in the event that the circuit breaker upstream of
the UPS is opened, the UPS will lose it earth reference. Therefore the UPS must have its own earthneutral connection. This can be achieved via a deltastar isolation transformer or delta /zigzag
isolation transformer with the star point connected to earth. The UPS output neutral and earthing
system is electrically isolated from the upstream earthing and neutral system.
Arup
C:\ARUP\ADMINISTRATION\MCF\PAPERS\AVAILABLE FOR ISSUE\EARTHING\ARUP - 2002 EARTHING AND BONDING OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS INSTALLATIONS AND COLO SYSTEMS
WORLDWIDE.DOC
4.3
Earth fault protection must not be utilised on the static bypass and manual bypass lines. When the
UPS is switched from the static bypass to the manual bypass the two feeders are in parallel. The
current in each phase may not divide equally between the two parallel paths, and consequently, this
will be detected by RCD (residual current Devices) as leakage current or earth fault. Such an
installation with RCD protection would be prevalent in Asia, with Singapore as an example.
Figure 5.2 Schematic of a UPS system were the output neutral is directly connected to the UPS input
neutral
Arup
C:\ARUP\ADMINISTRATION\MCF\PAPERS\AVAILABLE FOR ISSUE\EARTHING\ARUP - 2002 EARTHING AND BONDING OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS INSTALLATIONS AND COLO SYSTEMS
WORLDWIDE.DOC