Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
"If the doors of perception were cleansed every thing would appear
to man as it is, infinite."
--The marriage of Heaven and Hell, William Blake
This is a series of articles intended for the serious spiritual student.
The first five are mostly beginner level from a few years back,
originally intended for magazine publication. Much of the other
material is for advanced students. Advanced students who are not
completely familiar with Free Zone theory should read the second
section in numerical sequence, so as to not bypass critical data
and definitions. I am a philosophical researcher. I do not have a
practice to promote here. Please be advised that the intention of
this site is to communicate to those other researchers and
practitioners who are working to free and rehabilitate others -especially those in what is called the Free Zone. The information
on this site is for the use of people who are on both the magician's
and the meditational/processing paths. Everyone is free to use this
information and copy it, under two conditions: its origin is acknowledged (in other words say where and from whom you got it) and
money is not charged for access to this information. --Ouran
The Ghost Danse
HOW TO READ THIS MATERIAL
In the past great emphasis has been placed on understanding all of the words
in any material. It has been stressed to never go past any word one does not
fully understand. This is excellent advice. However, for reading my materials I
would like to add the following:
"When reading this material great care should be taken to not cling tightly to
past mental anchor points, otherwise known as stable data. Attempts to align
this with past data may cause conflict or it may not, but in neither case will this
material be used properly. Great care should also be taken not to memorize
or make forceful mental copies of this material. Instead I advise the reader to
read lightly, yet with full attention. The purpose of this material is to trigger
cognition. I want the reader to realize his or her own truth, not copy mine. My
truth does no one any good (except for me of course!). Therefore please treat
reading my materials as a light session and be sessionable while reading.
Under no circumstances grind away at any of my articles or isolated observations by memorizing forcefully while reading and thinking about them. It
is best to read each of them several different times, but lightly, lightly. If
cognition does not occur, release what I have said from your mind without
resistance and move on. Thank you."
Definitions
01. Islands in the Sea of Being
02. Equality
03. Languages and Your Mind
04. This Is the End, Beautiful Friend
14. Advice on Techniques for Manipulating Reality
Currently half awake:
Key articles indicated by
=*
Scios
61. The True Top
The Eightfold Matrix of Reality:
(The information in the following article on
pnohteftu is the work of Max and myself
together, it being impossible to pry our
efforts apart in this case. So for an
introduction to the Matrix, please read:
"Prime Manifestations of the Prime
Polarities".
His other Matrix articles are also
necessary to an understanding of the
structure of reality, please read them
here: the Pnohteftu.
Absolute Extremes of Existences
Conditions of Compiling Creations
On creation
attachments
Conditions of Spaces (Havingness)
Conditions of Awareness
Conditions of Energies (Motion and
immobility)
Conditions of Points or Locations - in
Space(s)
Another voice: Phil Scott
Conditions of Distances (Emotion and
attachment)
Conditions of Survival between Spirit and
Matter
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
73. The Four Vectors of So-called
"Creation"
25. Ascending the Tone Scale by Dissecting a
Thought
27. A Clear View of Case
30. The Dynamics
31. Knowing on the Know to Mystery
32. Avoiding the Bardo
35. The Static Processes
36. Cutting Through a Blizzard of Buddhism
37. Caveat Preemptor
40. Zen & the Art of Pervading Spaces
41. The Shape of Apparent "Truth"
42. Entity Theory
43. Symbols, Meaning and Physical Objects
47. The Planes
48. Subjective Reality, Objective Reality &
Panexistent Reality
49. Processing Aesthetics
50. Processing Space
51. Know Versus Know About
52. The Annotated Axioms
55. A Few Thoughts About Physics
56. The Doctrine of Anatta
57. The P.E.A.T. Process
58. The Top of the Tone Scale
59. Goals and the CDEI Scale
65. New CDEI Scale Button For Goals Processing
I was Lucky
Random Anecdotes
Humor
The Lap of Venice
email Ouran
FREE TIBET!
Instead they use their bodies. They use their bodies' senses
in order to be aware of the world, their bodies' brains in order
to think, and their bodies' consciousness in order to be
awake. Shut those off and they are blind, stupid and
obliterated. Their life is a tragic dependence on an animal life
form, and their physical death is a literal nightmare from which
there is no relief except reincarnation.
Some of these normal people are in worse shape than others.
A few have enough conscious control over their dreaming that
they can direct their between-lives experience into something
pleasant. Most merely go along for the ride -- wherever their
automatic mental machinery takes them. Some of those are in
such bad shape that they cannot be reborn. These may exist
as hungry ghosts, yearning for bodies they are unable to
enter. Others live an eternal nightmare, a hell of their own
making which exists only in their raving imaginations. These
are the criminally insane, collapsed to nearly a single point of
space. I do not know of anything which may be done to help
such people.
But I am not completely awake.
Perhaps someone very awake can help them.
The other end of the spectrum is happier. The rare awake
individual can retain full consciousness after the body dies;
and can deliberately reincarnate or not as a free decision. The
automatic between-lives experience (called the Bardo by the
Tibetan Buddhists, who have studied it intently) either does
not appear, or is laughed at by the awake person as a silly
hallucination.
A person who is awake is conscious of existing in more
planes than just the physical, and of being a far greater self
than that personality which is attached to a piece of meat. An
awake person will be aware of being a living nothingness in a
A few of the definitions of words used in spiritual science are so inadequate that I
see the need to correct and/or add to them.
Attitude.
The stable data and service facsimile(s) used at an emotional tone by a terminal (identity
at a single viewpoint in space). The most powerful sevfac in the attitude is related to the
actual GPM goal and its oppterm.
Consideration.
(noun) 1. A tone on the spiritual tones scale. 2. A consideration is the exact isness, the
result of a second postulate which obtains the persistence of the first postulate. In normal
usage in society a consideration is merely an opinion. In spiritual terms however the act
of consideration is that of alter-is by 2nd postulate.
Copy.
A copy differs from a duplicate in that a copy is not owned but instead belongs to
another, whereas a duplicate is created by oneself.
Decision.
The only action taken by theta. In the highest ranges decisions are made about
beingness, below that decisions are made about spaces and the contents of those spaces.
That latter sort of decision is commonly known as a "postulate" (see Ogger's brilliant
description below).
Duplication.
Duplication occurring through communication in a universe consists of two or more
locations becoming one another, which temporarily dissolves their distance and
separation, which in turn is another way of saying that the universe between them
has vanished.
Entity.
The Co$ tech dictionary definition of an entity is a joke. They quote LRH remarking
during the PDC lectures that an entity merely thinks it's alive, and thinks it's a being as
long as energy is fed to it. Not quite right. Entities do not require energy to be fed to
them, though they will come more alive when given attention. They are nothing unusual.
The truth is that there is theta in everything, even a dead chunk of granite. Ken Ogger's
understanding of entities is far superior to what LRH allowed printed on the subject, see
his writeups in "Super Scio." Normally an entity encountered in processing is an aware,
split off piece of theta which has become separated from either a thetan, a copy made by
another entity, or a piece separated from a higher level of being than a thetan. This piece
of theta is attached to some mind, and possesses fixed mental plane anchor points which
usual leave it stuck somewhere on a time track. A "body thetan" in a PC's space is
usually either a piece of the PC or more commonly a piece split away from someone else.
The size and power of entities range from near thetans (effectively a remote viewpoint of
one somewhere) down to as little as a single thought/ intention/purpose placed into a ball
of energy. I prefer to call these latter "thought forms", after the traditional occult term. A
specialized type of entity used in magick is a "thing", which is an entity surrounded by a
heavily energized astral body of its own. Entities are created by "decision" made in the
Causal band of the tone scale, which creates a division or split half of which is at Individuality or Coexistence, and the other half at Being Entities or Spiritual Death (see #24
Tone Scale).
Induction.
Observing many effects, and looking back in time for their common cause (at or above
Considerations on the tone scale) and knowing it clearly. Working backwards to recover
the exact isness.
MEST
Matter, Energy, Space and Time, i.e. the physical universe.
Misownership.
"Misownership is a misconception of authorship in that one being thinks his creation
was made by another or that another's is attributable to himself." (Ralph Hilton)
Other-consciousness.
The ultimate individuation. Creating another individual places one's previous self within
that individual at this tone.
Pan-determinism.
Godlike power as wielded through total control and responsibility. As those latter two
are Effort band activities, this idea is below ARC and is sub-death.
Pan-existence.
It can be defined as BEING others. The LRH idea of a broad sweep of control is not true
pan-determinism. True pan-determinism is high ARC being all terminals in a game.
This is the term LRH should have used instead of pan-determinism. And if you are
something, of course you can control it.
Postulate.
"A postulate is simply a projected decision or mockup. I say projected because a key
factor is the space permeated by the decision. If a decision about Paris permeates the
space of New York, it can only affect the relationship of New York to Paris and will not
act on Paris directly. Even a postulate which permeates the space it is intended to affect
is not all encompassing because there will be things outside of the target location which
also affect the target. And so we have a relative degree of action which is monitored by
the space encompassed by the postulate." (Ken Ogger, "Super Scio")
A Postulate is:
1. a decision which creates a space and its contents, which
2. then appears after the fact to have been projected INTO a space by the viewpoint
in space being used as a game terminal (called a thetan) by the individual who is
actually "outside" of space/time, which
3. in turn ends up appearing to be a mere thought which occurred at the location of the
viewpoint/thetan.
A thought is sort of far removed from what's really happening, which is the act of creation. All "postulates" are decisions bringing something into or out of existence. Most
people are below awareness of the higher levels of themselves and do not perceive any
of this which occurs above the thought.
#1 above is at tone 100 on the tone scale (Filbert's expanded)
#2 is the after the fact existence viewed between tones 40 to 16 approximately
#3 is the apparency as viewed from the emotion and effort areas of the scale between
tones 8 to -8.
Primal pair.
Primal means underlying the span of existence and noticably senior to a section of the
tone scale. Pair equals dichotomy. So a primal pair is a dichotomy which creates a
portion of reality and visibly relates to a portion of the tone scale. A dichotomy is not in
and of itself aberrative until a person decides to pursue half of it as a goal and reject the
other half. That pursuit of half a dichotomy, half a primal pair creates a primal goal.
Primal goal.
Resistance.
Resistance is not-isness, and therefore lies at Effort and MEST. An excellent vignette on
the subject from Amos Jessup: The Anatomy of Resistance.
Service facsimile.
A service fac can be viewed mechanically as a valence one is NOT being. Sure, the view
is correct in that the person is being a valence; but the service fac action is the rejection
of an opposing valence, or to say it better, an EXCLUDED valence. This originates in a
mental image picture (facsimile), and is used to make self right and excluded other
wrong. The hidden truth is that the person is still being both sides of the conflict, with
one enforced and the other denied.
It's not who you are being. It's who you are refusing to be that makes the service fac.
Theta.
That which is aware taken as a whole.
Thetan.
A part of theta occupying a location in space from which it views, i.e. a viewpoint (see
below). Often called a spirit or ghost.
Thought.
A mechanical definition of thinkingness (think-think, figure-figure) would be:
1. That thought which occurs as an effort to sort, arrange, classify, identify, and differentiate ideas which the being has attached to small bits of mental mass. The key
word here is "effort."
A definition of high scale thought (above emotingness) would be:
2. Being, knowing and looking directly without using any energies of the Emotion, Effort and Mystery bands of the tone scale.
Effort level thought will show up on an e-meter as minor needle action as the masses of
the thoughts appear, move around and vanish. High scale thought produces a floating
needle.
Viewpoint.
1. a set of stable data, including the operating service fac of the terminal (identity), held
by a person at any specific emotional tone.
2. the physical universe location in three dimensions from which a person views the
universe.
This focused point of awareness, this spirit, has more than attention
turned outward in all directions -- it glows constantly with energy that
flows outward in all directions as well. The ancient Sanskrit word for
god is "deva", from which we get our words "divine" and "devil." Deva
means "shining one". This may not make much sense to you that the
ancients would have used that name, but it's because many of them
could see glowing spirits in the air. Almost no one in modern times
can still do this, but it used to be an easy thing for many people to do.
I'm not going to go into long explanations about why and how we have
degenerated intomaterialistic meat robots.
Some other time, okay?
A human being is a spirit operating a meat body, which organism is
little more than an organic machine, sort of a mobile vegetable. A nice
analogy for a person and their body would be a person driving a car.
A spirit does not possess any mass, though it readily creates both
mass and energy. A body is matter, that is to say, atoms and
molecules organized into systems. Between the spirit and the body
are at least three major levels of control which I can perceive. These
three lumped together could be called the "mind." The body itself
possesses its own mental machinery, physically located in the obvious
place, the brain. It also possesses many other less obvious mental
mechanisms, most of which are the ductless glands. Please note that
these ductless or "endocrine" glands are composed of modified nerve
cells. These other sites taken together seem to roughly coincide with
the Chakras of the Hindus. This brain and these glands interact with
the spirit's three levels of control to produce all phenomena
associated with humans, from emotion and reason, on up to
clairvoyance and "magic."
The brain allows reality to be organized in the familiar fashion that we're
all accustomed to, but reality is quite different from what you think it is.
The spirit's point of view when bodiless is often radically different from
what most people regard as "normal" reality.
Mind consists of consideration, of idea -- plus energy. Thought at almost
all levels consists of consideration, which is to say "meaning", attached
or tagged to matter/energy. A mental image is an energy field that has
been given form, with just enough meaning attached to it for the person
to identify the form. Visualize a chair, and "know" it is a chair. This is a
lot of energy, a literal "force field", with a small amount of meaning
attached. A thought on the other hand is the reverse of that. A normal
thought is a very small whisp of matter/energy with a proportionally
larger amount of meaning to it (I perceive two levels of thought. There is
coarse thought at a level below emotion, in the effort range. This is
thought as you are familiar with it. But just before you think a visible
thought a knowing occurs. That knowing is the actual thought at a high
level above emotion and effort, with the visible thought its lower echo.).
Think "chair" without forming a mental image, and all the meaning of
"chair" is attached to a microscopic flicker of mass. The concept of
"chair" contains such ideas as seat, legs, back, armrests, etc -everything that makes up a chair. But the thought itself is all that
significance stuck onto a microscopic bead of matter/energy that is
flicked into existence by the spirit, only to vanish instantly, unless held
onto by the attention.
The lowest level of control is that contained within the body's aura.
This is sometimes referred to as the etheric body or etheric double;
sometimes as the astral body. It is shaped roughly the same as the
physical body, but is a little larger, extending outward through the skin
a few inches in all directions. It is an energy field often containing
images (mental image pictures) most of which are memories, emotion,
effort, and maybe enough meaning to identify the images. There also
seems to be some sort of machinery, as evidenced by the
aforementioned chakras. All too often at this level, the images, ideas
and machines are unviewed and unidentified by the spirit, and
therefore they tend to persist and obsess. This is what Hubbard was
describing with his "engrams" and other mental junk. These unviewed
pieces of the past can be placed anywhere in relation to the body (out
to a surprisingly great distance), but are usually spotted close to or
within it.
The next level is the one that a person probably thinks of as their
thinking mind. It is roughly spherical, centered around the location in
the space occupied by the spirit. In most people that means centered
on the body's head. It is a sphere of awareness that in most people
seems to be anywhere from a foot to three feet in diameter. It contains
focused attention and organized awareness. It is at this level of energy
that thinking (more than visualizing) occurs. It is characterized by big
meanings tagged onto small matter/energy. (Let me digress for a
moment and point out that there are two sorts of "personal space": one
is this spherical space of a few feet in diameter, which is a space you
HAVE, and the other is more like a sphere two inches in diameter,
which is a space you are BEING. The two together form the area
within which you do those activities you call your mind.
The next level above that, the one just below pure spirit as an absolute,
has no shape, no limits, and effectively is as large as the area within
which the spirit happens to be interacting with the universe. As an inflow
it appears to many people to resemble a vast ocean of living universe,
as though the whole physical universe were alive. As an outflow I
perceive it as an infinite number of infinitely long rays extending
outward. The oddest thing about them is that these rays appear to have
zero diameter and be completely transparent -- despite looking sort of
like white lines. I can see them, but I can also see right through them!
Odd. This level is characterized by considerations and ideas that are
not attached to any mental energy at all, but instead are applied directly
to the physical universe. This is the real sphere of influence of a spirit
within the universe, and is the reason mental images may be found a
considerable distance from the body. It is at this level that a spirit
causes direct influences on the physical universe itself.
The "size" of a spirit is usually judged to be its reach, at what distance it
can affect the universe. Another yardstick is the size of the space they
are being. A third yardstick for judging the "size" of a spirit is by he
diameter of its personal havingness space. Most people seem to be
about 2-3 feet in diameter. Some are only a foot in diameter. People that
are a foot in diameter can be very annoying to others because hey have
no sense of violating other people's personal spaces. If you're no bigger
than your body's head then you don't feel that you are pressing in on
someone else until your head is literally up against theirs! This pisses
off people who are three feet in diameter when standing in line at the
bank because the one footers stand too damn close!
Occasionally one will encounter a very large being. I have met people
who can fill rooms, or even fill entire houses. Usually a person like this
will not make others uncomfortable by their presence, just the opposite.
In the past many large beings have been regarded as saints.
Let me make one thing clear, I do not believe in the Judeo-ChristianMoslem God. Whether one says Jehovah, Yahveh or Allah, I see no
evidence that any such personal and patriarchal being exists.
Nevertheless, I have considerable subjective data which indicate that
the physical universe is a creation. It also seems in an odd way to be
itself alive, as a part of something which penetrates it and contains it.
Call it "God" if you wish. I don't give a damn. Not only does all physical
matter seem to be alive in some odd way, but it appears that we spirits
have the ability to infuse more life and beingness into matter, and into
already living organisms. This ranges from dull students "coming alive"
under the influence of a particularly attentive teacher, to pets which are
"almost human" as a result of constant attention from a human, to
potted plants which grow like crazy because their owner talks to them,
to weird shit like a dilapidated car which runs perfectly in response to a
loving owner. Unfortunately, the reverse is also true. There have been
cases of cars which refuse to start when their owners are angry. People
can screw up anything, even make a house nearly uninhabitable due to
their ugly influence.
The medium through which this influence is transmitted is attention, and
the flows are either love or hate. Extrapolate that ability to larger
spheres of influence and it looks an awful lot like some of the abilities
ascribed to "God." Since I have personally witnessed a human walking
around with a clear aura of tremendous size as a result of spiritual
enlightenment, then I have to assume that we are all capable of such
godliness. (God, I hate that word "god"! It just irks me to no end to have
to use it.) The implication of my observations is that we are all,
collectively, God.
But it does NOT resemble the puerile superstitions of ignorant
merchants, herdsmen and carpenters.
I said above that we are living in a sea of being. I was being poetic
rather than precise when I made that statement. The sea of being is
what we apparently split off from. Before we were individuals, we were
perhaps part of an undifferentiated beingness that just is, but which
doesn't ever say "I am." Or to be exact, the moment the sea of being
says "I am only me" a new spirit separates from the None, the
Nameless. At that moment a new eye of God has formed, a new point of
view from which to look. The act of a new spirit entering the
physicaluniverses is symbolized by trump 0 of the tarot deck. The Fool
represents a new pal foolishly entering the universe, with no suspicions
that going into agreement with its rhythms will subject it to joy and
sorrow. (Hubbard did not understand The Fool because he had a
misunderstood caused by his familiarity with the tarot deck designed by
Aleister Crowley. His remarks in the PDC are incorrect.)
Your body is not you. Your mind is not you. Your memories that you
hold so dear are not you. All the organization of your thoughts and ideas
that you have carefully built up are not you. Your personality is not you.
Your desires are not you. Your emotions or feelings are not you.
Everything that you think you are, you are not.
You are a nothing. You are awareness at an arbitrary location in space,
a location that you can change at any time. You surround yourself with
thoughts and emotions and mental images but you are none of these
things. They exist a few millimeters, inches or feet out from your
location, with just enough space separating them from you so that you
can look at them, experience them and manipulate them. They also
often occupy not quite the same space as the physical universe, as if
they weren't quite inside it somehow. If they were to exactly occupy the
same space with you who are an eye of God, so that you would
perfectly "be" (duplicate) them, they would vanish instantly. No thing in
your mind may be duplicated by you and survive.
back to index
EQUALITY
All "men" are NOT created equal! That line from the preamble to the
United States Constitution is a fuck-up, what the poor dears meant to
say was that all men have equal rights. Too many times there have
been microcephaloids who have taken that to mean that all men have
equal abilities, often followed by a wistful fuzzythink of "if only all men
had equal opportunity, then they would all exhibit equal ability." Wrong!
There has been a philosophical war under way during most of the 20th
century between liberals and conservatives. The conservatives
maintained that breeding (race?) determined character and ability, while
the liberals said a person was solely the product of their early
environment.
Both are only partially correct and therefore both are basically wrong.
Environment does influence how a child develops, but the environment
can only work on what's already there. No touchie-feelie liberal money
pit of a Federal program is ever going to make silk sows out of any
pursed ears. The conservatives are partially correct in that a human
body is limited to the channels of expression hardwired into it at birth,
but they are doubly wrong because not only does environment play a
role in developing what potential's there at birth, but also because
there's much more to a human than mere genetic inheritance.
You don't think so? Look around at all the low-lifeforms inhabiting our
cities, many of them are little better than animals themselves. And yet...
they often yearn for more than the sufficient food & shelter life they live.
Somewhere behind the facade of their human consciousnesses still
exists their real natures only to be barely glimpsed in an awareness
and appreciation of beauty (something an animal can't do). There is far
more to a human than the visible meat and bones, even with the
smaller beings...
Ouran
back to index
The reality is that all the levels in the above scale exist as both particle
and wave. Do not be fooled by any apparency indicating otherwise.
When using the three higher languages -- discounting body language
because it is the primary language of the animal mind that lives in
your body beneath your heart -- first you "know" what you mean. This
knowing is pre-word, pre-note, pre-number and is immediately
followed by creating a series of small specks of matter/energy less
than a millimeter in diameter. Each speck is assigned a bit of the
original overall meaning. Then each speck can be used to trigger the
body into saying a word or writing a number or playing a musical note.
BUT...
But music is usually not played that way. Instead the music is held in
the mind as a mental image (a changing one like a movie) full of vibrant
feeling and intense auditory coloring, and the musician plays
unthinkingly the two dimensional music out of this flowing image. (It
would seem that in order to control something, one needs to control it
from one dimension more than that thing possesses. A two
dimensional, "flat" image is created in 3D. This then implies that our 3D
universe is controlled and operated through four dimensions...)
Your mind consists basically of thoughts, images (including memories)
and what you believe about everything. I said "believe" but one could
say "consider" or "put in place" instead. I usually just call it "posting."
One could use a favorite word of the Hubbardites here and say
"postulate", but since the dictionary defines a postulate as "a hypothsis
advanced as an essential presupposition or premise of a train of reasoning" (Whew! Did you follow that?) then I would need to add that a
postulate is a created reality that is an essential precursor to following
realities. Did that make any sense to you? Probably not,but that's not
your fault. This stuff is hard as hell to talk about because the English
language isn't adequate to express it. So it's back to finger pointing -and hopefully you aren't pointing middle fingers back at me, ha ha.
The key activity seems to be the spirit's act of assigning meaning. This
is the spirit's action of attaching an abstraction, an idea to a piece of
matter. At the highest level I've directly observed, the spirit assigns a
"meaning" to the universe as a whole, telling it what to do or what it will
be. Below that the spirit assigns meaning to objects, images and
thought specks. But anything can be attached (tagged) to anything else.
This is why music evokes (not invokes! use a good dictionary and look
up the difference.) emotions and sensations (ghostly images in the
range of desire/effort) and unbidden mental pictures. Music has the
same free-form quality (to at least some extent) as do dreams.This is
because dreams are creations, and music -- lacking intrinsic meaning -nudges the spirit into assigning meaning to the music. Music therefore
nudges a spirit into being what it really is: a creator. Perhaps the reason
creative people are sometimes so arrogant is because they instinctively
know that they are being gods. What they have conveniently forgotten
is: so is everyone else.
So what is spirit? Good question. It seems to infuse all matter (even
inanimate matter), to operate bodies and to exist independent of
bodies. It also seems to exist independent of space, time and matter/
energy. Spirit beings (like you and I) have a point location in space,
but that location is not fixed in any way in space and seems not to be
fixed in time either. Spirit beings look as if they are glowing holes in
space/time. There is a constant flow of energy outward from any spirit
being, that it can manipulate and increase for various purposes. Oriental martial artists use energy in one range (astral to etheric),called chi
or ki, in physical combat. Yoga practitioners and many other spiritual
and/or magical trainees also learn to utilize and expand their natural
abilities as a spirit.
Keep in mind that you are not a mind. You are a nameless point of
awareness that uses the many things, which lumped together can be
called the mind, as a way to control your surroundings and the complex
mechanisms of your body's brain. That brain has its limitations, is
inadequate in its channels (as anyone who has done out-of-body or
introspective spiritual work knows) and is subject to injury. It would be
nice if the brain accommodated the apparent division of the universe
into either wave or particle by processing both views of reality efficiently
in separate hemispheres. But, no. And it would also be beneficial if all
men could easily process both views of reality with the same ease. But
again, no; and so some people are artists and others are bookkeepers.
Some form a gestalt easily (wave) and write music, while others are
better at linear reasoning and button-sorting.
So that's a taste of how your mind works in relation to languages, with
hopefully enough background about the nature of reality for the whole
thing to make sense.
Ouran
back to index
The answer to poor Omar's two part question is quite simple. The body
is merely a complex machine that a person operates by means of flows
of energy and intention, analogous to a person's body driving a car. A
car has controls which can be worked to make it do things. A body also
has controls -- almost infinitely finer and more delicate than a car's -that can be worked to make it do things. When a body dies its operator
abandons it, and usually finds a new model to drive. Only instead of a
car dealership, a person finds a new body at just before, during or right
after birth. Hospitals and nurseries are very popular places among
ghosts. So that answers Omar's question about human death. Usually a
person gets another body -- occasionally not, due to insanity, spiritual
reenlightenment, or a emporary shortage of new births.
Now to the second half of Omar's plaintive query: human fate. I
suppose that could be a little slippery depending on exactly how one
defines "fate", but I'm going to use what definition suits me, to hell with
what you think!
I suppose Omar means "fate after death". First thing that happens is the
person pops out of the body and hovers a few feet above it and looks
down on it. This seems, from my personal memories of being killed, to
be a trigger for what the pop psychologists are calling these days
"closure". A person looks down on the dead body and lets it really sink
in that their prized possession is no longer functional. Somewhere
around this point (timing varies a bit from person to person) they relive
their entire lifetime as a high speed movie. This is viewed in the greatest
detail -- not just highlights! -- in literally an instant. If this doesn't sound
possible to you, please be advised that your precious stable reality is
not what you think it is. Subjective elapsed time is variable, and controllable by a person.
This mechanism of reliving the entire life sometimes kicks in when a
person is close to death, or has a very close call of some sort. People
have reported having their entire life "flash before their eyes" in an
instant during accidents.
The next thing that happens to most of us is that various forgetters kick in on us from the depths of our minds. One causes a
person to simply to float slowly upward away from the body until
all the details below are too far way to see clearly. While this
happens a blurring is going on within the memory that leaves
most newborn babies with a blank slate.
Another forgetter is one that I personally dislike and find vaguely
alarming: a tunnel materializes around the person, down which they
are swept until they either enter a blinding light or a golden image. I've
managed to trigger this mechanism while alive, in this lifetime in fact,
and I'd like you to know that it can be overcome with sufficient application of energy and intention. I blasted my way out by causing a
mental burst of white light right into the golden icon at the end of the
tunnel. This destroyed the entire hallucination. I hope that whoever
the sick sombitch was who thought up that one is permanently stuck
to a golden idol hanging on a wall somewhere on an otherwise
uninhabited planet. Fuck you, buddy!
As for fate, like I said earlier, most of us simply reincarnate at that point.
But there are some disquieting facts that I'd like to share with you. One
is that animals seem to be operated by the same sort of thing that operates human bodies, but those spirits aren't as powerful. Are they the
same thing we are, or something else? To be completely honest with
you, I don't know. It may be that by operating bodies we slowly over
millenia or aeons degenerate into weaker and weaker conditions. Was
a spider once like us? It is what I fear. But perhaps not.
If true then our fate may be to become weaker and weaker as we are
ground down by the weight of our experiences. If this is true then Gautama (the Buddha) was right and we should disconnect from the world.
Indeed, if true perhaps we should entirely give up living in bodies upon
planets.
What I have to tell you is that reality is not what you've been taught.
Everything you think about your own nature and the nature of the
universe around you is as false as medieval sailors who thought that
the world was flat. The only thing flat around here is your poor head. I'm
not making this shit up. I remember things you wouldn't believe. I don't
remember any "beginning" to the universe or to myself. Perhaps there
was one. Perhaps not. The last and final word I have for you as to your
fate, O Human, is that near as my memories of the past can determine,
we are all immortal spirits that go on being conscious for eternity. Your
body can fail but you can never cease to exist.
There you go, Omar. Happy?
Ouran
back to index
the future, the person has to make sure they don't undo it by
looking at it. One may simply forget about it. Or one may
assign the decision to someone else (Samples: God did it. It's
fate. My wife makes those decisions for me.). Or one can lie
about the time the decision was made (I opened that parking
space 15 thousand years ago.).
Geoffrey Filbert came up with an auditing method of creating
effects in the physical universe, where he put himself on a
meter and audited other people into changing their minds. A
description of this is in his book "Excalibur Revisited".
Another way to overcome the problem of the density of the
universe caused by the accumulation of buried prior decisions
is to repeat one's decision. Do it over and over and over
again, for hours, days, months, years!
Lately I've been toying with the idea that the reason the
physical universe is so dense is because it actually is four
dimensional in spite of it's apparent three dimensions. And I'm
not treating time as a dimension either. I mean four spacial
dimensions. This could account for the efficacy of the
repetition method.
The really smart way to get anything done requires a greatly
increased span of attention. One needs this broader attention,
and one needs to cultivate psychic abilities in regards to
visualizing as well. Because what one has to do is examine
the past of the area one is intending to change, locate all
decisions about it made in the past and present, take
complete responsibility for them, and change one's mind!
That's right, you read correctly. One must mentally reach back
in time and make changes there in addition to here. The
reason for this is the nature of reality and time itself. The time
assigned to anything is its moment of creation. Nothing exists
in now except as a false modification of original
I want to make a very strong point here about MEST versus theta.
Material in motion,whether rocks or energy, is an apparent one way
flow, a one direction motion. It is not communication. Communication
requires duplication of meaning or intention, by theta at both ends of the
comm. Because of this, all true comm lines, all theta communication is
TWO WAY. Any time a material object or energy produces a backflow,
then duplication has occurred and theta is involved on both of the
apparent ends of the comm line. I say "apparent" because all separation
of theta from itself is an illusion and a lie. But matter itself is a form of
theta, in which the awareness is asleep.
So with any comm line which has a thetan at one end and matter at the
other, a funny thing happens: there's a slight backflow from the matter.
(In fact if you communicate enough to matter you will eventually wake it
up. It will come uptone into the effort band or even higher. This can
have pleasant, unpleasant, or even ludicrous results, because the
material object can function when it shouldn't, or misbehave when used,
or act in bizarre ways.
Duplication is the cause of the two way phenomenon. This is very
important fact in magick, in auditing and in society in general: anywhere
there is theta, all comm lines will be two way.
But what is meaning in communication?
It is usually assumed that words, whether spoken or written have
intrinsic meanings. This is false. They only have the meanings which
are assigned to them. A word is a symbol, nicely defined as "mass plus
meaning." One of the most basic abilities of a person is to tag a
significance onto a piece of matter/energy. My high level thought
experiments (visualizations) and "goings" (I have no idea what else to
call it when I reach "up/out" and look around my universe at a brighter
level of awareness.) indicate that meaning is a postulate.
that is the narrative content of incidents were not the true causes of case. They were linked to the true
causes, but were not the actual source of a being's problems. "Implants" for example are excuses; they
are motivators. Even unsticking a motivator by locating a corresponding overt is merely loosening up
the dichotomy formed between them, it is not locating how that problem arose in the first place. The
real cause of case, of dukkha, lies far above the overt/motivator phenomenon. It lies well above any of
the contents of physical universes. The real causes of case lie far above the located spirit or "thetan".
They originate in the archetypal activities of what Rowland Barkley calls the "source self", which is
above time and space and the four planes of this universe.
updated 10/26/00
TO BE (or) TO EXIST
This is the "postulate" of Single Deity. It could also be stated
slightly down the scale as:
I AM
I AM ME
This is part of the process below Coexistence of not-knowing
oneself in order to produce individuated thetans. Ask any
beingness who he is long enough and you'll get that same
answer: "Me!"
Looking at the span of existence (the tone scale) is see:
EVERY PROPOSITION CONTAINS ITS OPPOSITE
another way:
THE TOP IS THE BOTTOM
Both of these seem to derive from:
ZERO EQUALS TWO
This one gives us our span from total existence down to total
non-existence. In this the Static is divided into positive versus
negative qualities. To state any positive concept like "love" is
to instantly create its opposite of "hate." "Be" versus "not- be."
"Know" versus "not-know." GPMs are based on this one. But
we had to complicate it further with the first, 2nd, 3rd
postulate concepts which give us our triangles. At root they
appear to be this bit of apparent nonsense:
ONE EQUALS THREE
Which is to say the 1st postulate (the as-isness) equals the
3rd postulate (not-isness). This gives us a space into which
were inserted our scales, and it also opens up reality into a
universe or universes in which we may have a game. This is
because "zero equals two" and "one equals three" apparently
combine to produce this persisting postulate:
THREE IS THE ANTITHESIS OF ONE
When a top concept such as KNOW is stated, it then
automatically (as per this postulate) creates an opposition
another will be a change of some sort, and the third will either
dissolve into theta again or drop to the bottom. ALWAYS.
(The third leg is a concealed dichotomy.) So double check all
triangles for this pattern. If they have it, you have a valid
triangle which operates within the mind and universes (same
things). If a triangle does not fit this pattern then it should be
rejected or amended appropriately.
Sorry if this sounds pedantic. It's not intended that way. I wish
to help everyone in their endeavors by communicating what
I've uncovered.
This is a major discovery. I wish I didn't have to find it. I wish
LRH had found it, but the closest he came was to say
something to the effect that the theta cycle was CREATECREATE-CREATE, and the MEST cycle was CREATESURVIVE-DESTROY. Don't ask me for the reference on that.
I forget where he said that.
The root of it when I first investigated seemed to be the cycle
of creation.
The Creation Triangle
AS-IS ALTER-IS NOT-IS
(Then later I got a clear view higher on the tone scale and
saw what was above creation and postulation: BEINGNESS.)
This is the cycle of creation as it appears within a universe.
Therefore it will be the cycle that people can see clearly and
hold within their minds because it is low enough on the scale
that it can be imaged.
A thing is intended/postulated as-is, then it is immediately lied
about and altered to keep it from vanishing. The common trick
a person uses to alter an as-isness is to deny having made it.
The persisting alter-isness is sometimes referred to as an
"isness" but that term is unnecessary. Remember: this is the
a point which both claimed, but neither was fully BEING. This
necessitated AGREEMENT about that third point, which
neither thetan allowed the other to be, which was laid on top
of neither thetan allowing itself to be the other thetan.
That laid in the entire pattern from that point on. Different
thetans who could BE one another at will, but which in order
to maintain a game kept themselves separate, contended
over objects which they had to communicate to one another
about in order to make those objects "real", i.e. agreed-upon.
What I'm seeing is some prime principle which is behind both
universes and the structure of the mind. This principle has
three parts, and each part looks different depending upon
what area of mind or universe it's applied to. Let's label the
three parts 1, 2 and 3 so that we can easily keep track of
which are analogous to one another. That gives us:
1. create 2. exist 3. destroy
1. be 2. do 3. have
1. start 2. change 3. stop
1. born 2. live 3. die
1. love (affinity) 2. communication 3. reality (agreement)
1. Knowing as certainty 2. Control 3. Responsible
1. creation of spaces 2. change of space (movement) 3.
anchor points of spaces
Careful consideration will yield this relation to the Heisenberg
Uncertainty Principle:
"1." is the observer, we who create things.
"2." is a particle in motion whose energy is known but location
is unknown because it keeps changing.
"3." is a particle whose location is known, but whose energy
(motion) has been stopped and is therefore unknown.
I call this the Heisenberg Triangle.
So these primal triangles relate to the Heisenberg uncertainty
2.
alter-isness
do
change
survive
motion
3.
not-isness
have
stop
destroy
anchor
2.
alter-isness
do
survive
live
communication
control
motion
change
energy
flow
cardinal
Visnu
3.
not-isness
have
destroy
die
reality
responsible
anchor
stop
mass
ridge
fixed
Siva
Bhagavad Gita.
Add another echo of the primal triangle I just spotted, the
Symbol triangle:
meaning
mobility
mass
Add the 2nd, 3rd and 4th tones on Filbert's tone scale:
static
coexistence
individuality
These three are the only triangle I've seen which lies above
Creation on the tone scale.
In the African/Caribbean Yoriba system:
Olorun
Eleda
Olodumare
ORUN:
OLORUN: This is the all encompassing IT, that which everything has within.
The source of everlasting being and existence. The Creator of all things. The
life giver. The Alpha and Omega. That which was in the beginning and has no
end. All things comes from The Power. Beyond comprehension.
ELEDA: Energy unconditioned by matter. The radiant force from the source of
all things. All things within the power of Olorun, the indwelling spirit - Odu.
OLODUMARE: Energy manifested into matter. That which is seen as material.
All things within Olorun.
(from the IjoOrunmila cosmology page)
On the other hand Ken, they probably do! This would have to
be the triangle behind the Know to Mystery scale. (Definitely
not the KRC triangle.) In the ascending version of this triangle
2.3.1 Create
2.3.2 Survive
2.3.3 Destroy
3. Physical Reality
3.1 Space
3.1.1 Viewpoint
3.1.2 Dimension
3.1.3 Location
3.2 Energy
3.2.1 Dispersal
3.2.2 Flow
3.2.3 Ridge
3.3 Mass
3.3.1 Gas
3.3.2 Liquid
3.3.3 Solid
(This article should probably not be read until after you have
read and understood "The Three Part Cycle (triangle) of
Damned Near Everything.")
Not-isness is defined as any postulate(s) in addition to (on top
of) the 2nd postulate which was the alter-isness creating
persistence. This can be a 3rd postulate, 4th postulate, 104th,
10,879,214th postulate, etc. Agreement is not-isness. Let me
say that again for those of you who are stunned: agreement,
that is to say "reality" of the ARC triangle, is NOT-ISNESS. It
is not-isness because it is a false isness. A true isness is the
exact alter-isness. A false isness is any postulate which
claims to be the persisting alter-isness, but which in fact is
something else. Experimentally, if you were to take a beer
bottle (no need to empty it first) and sit across from it and
agree with it, agree with it, agree with it, over and over again,
you would find it fading and becoming unreal. This is notisness at work. If instead you looked at it fresh, not agreeing
with what's there but taking a new sceptical look each time,
over and over again, you would find it getting brighter and
more real. This is looking at it, stripping away not-isness, and
getting at the isness which is the exact anatomy of the alterisness of the original as-isness.
The sequence of creation goes like this:
As-isness, the original postulate/creation. This is the thetan
making something new in new unit of time and space. This is
followed by...
(This article should probably not be read until after you have
read and understood "The Three Part Cycle (triangle) of
Damned Near Everything.")
The breakthrough I made recently identifying some of the
most basic actions of a thetan -- as-isness, alter-isness, and
not-isness -- as being the source and origin of the other basic
triangles such as ARC and SCS, has profound significance in
relation to spiritual development and rehabilitation. Both the
"clearing" of Scientology and the meditations of Buddhism are
clarified by this data. I suspect it may assist anyone doing
research by giving them a baseline stable datum against
which to double check any proposed process.
As per the above named article, here are the usual triangles
(plus the Universe triangle in line 7 and the Heisenberg
triangle in line 9). The first line is the most basic triangle, with
the lines under it consisting of permutations, echoes at lower
harmonics and other variations of the basic actions of a
thetan.
as-isness
not-isness
alter-isness
be
have
do
create
destroy
survive
born
die
live
affinity
reality
communication
know
responsible
control
space
anchor
motion
start
points/objects
change
observer
stop
energy
mass
flow
dispersal
ridge
The first item is "as-isness" and it is the action sought after by
a PC in almost all Scientology auditing. Only in a few OT drills
does the processee aim for achieving items in the 2nd
column, like with drilling intention or energy flows. Often the
2nd column is used as a means to achieve column one -communication and control being the most common examples
-- but it is a means, not the desired end result.
Much of magic and some of yoga consist of 2nd column
practices. These are valid activities leading to rehabilitating
some of what the scios call OT powers, but they do not
achieve erasure, clearing, resolution of case, etc. Only
activities in the first column resolve case, especially the first
item of the top line: as-isness. This discovery of the identity of
the various triangles explains why a process such as holding
the corners of a room is effective -- it falls under "space" in the
first column.
The four profound states of Buddhism called Brahma-Vihara
are all found in the first column. These are: metta (goodwill),
karuna (compassion), mudita (appreciative joy), and upekkha
(equanimity). They represent an ever expanding sphere of
affinity which occurs as the Buddhist awakens from the dream
of life. The fourth state, upekkha, should be regarded as far
(This article should probably not be read until after you have
read and understood "The Three Part Cycle (triangle) of
Damned Near Everything" and "The Postulates Behind
Numbers")
This is probably going to be the more useful in practical terms
of these articles. This one is focused on the process of asisness as it occurs in auditing and self-processing.
Originally processes were run only from the point of view of
the PC. The auditor asked for incidents which happened TO
the PC -- recall a time when someone injured your "gortch"
(non-existent body part), a previous time, etc. But Dianetic
auditing and Scientology auditing both achieved less than
total erasures and key-outs by only running the flow into self.
Next it was discovered that it was necessary to run other
flows. So the overt flow was added (recall a time you injured
someone else's gortch), then others to others (recall a time
someone injured another's gortch) and finally self to self
(recall a time you hurt your own gortch). That got a lot more
case off.
But... Funny, that didn't seem to relieve all possible charge
either...
So a new wrinkle was added. Run all the above flows, but in
each incident, recall them from the point of view of each
person involved in the incident. That got a lot more charge,
huh?
COLLAPSED TRIANGLES
This article may receive a bit of protest, possibly even
vehement denial from some quarters. I'm rearranging many
people's stable data here, and some may not like it one bit.
But it has to be done, to clean up the subject a little. So
please bear with me and hear me out...
In the earlier article "The Three Part Cycle (triangle) of
Damned Near Everything" I mentioned in passing that the
triangles we know from studying Scientology -- ARC, KRC,
etc -- are really manifestations of two different actions. Part of
the time we are seeing them act as a form of the MEST
universe cycle AS-ISNESS, ALTER-ISNESS, NOT-ISNESS, -and part of the time as the theta cycle of AS-ISNESS, ALTERISNESS, then followed by another AS-ISNESS. In
Scientology these two cycles have sometimes been lumped
together, with less than perfect results. So let's start with...
START-CHANGE-STOP. Quite simply the Co$ materials fail
at times to properly distinguish between "stop" as not-is, and
"stop" as an as-isness which causes a vanishing of the item.
A vanishing of an item isn't a stop, it's a restart. "Stop" as a
third postulate, force, etc should never be confused with asisness. Remember that as-isness of this sort is a duplication
by Static.
BE-DO-HAVE. It bothered me when I wrote the first triangles
article that there were "havingness" processes used to make
people better. It bothered me because I knew with great
certainty that 3rd column actions were anathema to clearing.
In an email message to some friends I wrote:
As you recall from my articles, I had noticed that the Co$ triangles had
collapsed together the MEST universe cycle of "as-is, alter-is, not-is" with
its theta eqivalent of "as-is, alter-is, as-is."
What was bothering me was that I had determined that all MEST triangle third
column actions -- ALL OF THEM! -- were highly aberrative, and were the direct
cause of the descending spiral of thetans. I had determined that NO third
column actions were useable for processing and clearing, only first column
actions, and second column actions which lead to first column results were
useful.
But that superficially conflicted with Hubbard's havingness
remedies!!!!!!!!!! "HAVE" is in the third column of the BE, DO, HAVE
triangle. How could this be????
I was all prepared to grind my face off resolving that conflict... then you
Jurgen [Kluft] come along and blithely write:
"- Havingness, the ability to have something or someone
in your space just as it is, without the CDEI on reach
and withdraw."
And I immediately spot that the definition of havingness there is actually a
definition of "BE", not "HAVE." Note the key first column phrases: "in your
space" (same space is affinity) and "just as it is" (as-is).
The Co$ staffers, and apparently LRH himself had these two
different KRC actions collapsed into one another. How else
can you account for the tendency of the church to attempt to
make their staff, especially Sea Org members, be
"responsible" using heavy force and no affinity? How else to
account for LRH screaming at people to obtain compliance,
and ordering them thrown over the side of a ship if they
performed less than perfectly? Force is NOT-IS. Affinity is ASIS.
If one knew this and wished to get a staffer to be perfectly
responsible for his/her post, then a first column action would
be indicated. On the KRC triangle the theta "responsible"
equals a return to "know" (KNOW, CHANGE, KNOW), so the
staffer would be trained to know the post in order to control it
perfectly (not optimally damn it!), and therefore be
RESPONSIBLE as CAUSE. Quite a difference between the
two actions.
It's exactly as different as the difference between AS-IS and
NOT-IS. Apparently Hubbard never recovered a certain prime
postulate we all made which creates the opposite of theta,
then equates them to each other. This equating of the top with
the bottom is the cause of all our scales like Know to Mystery
and the Tone Scale. If the postulate is not recovered then the
opposition dichotomies remain collapsed into one another in a
way very similar to collapsed GPM terminals -- only this item
runs far deeper into a thetan's past. (This may need
processes to be created to handle it.) Apparently: first we
created the separation, then we collapsed it by equating the
opposites to one another. This made a is/not-is conflict which
persists quite well!
Underlying this phenomena is the fact that at the very high
level on the tone scale just below the top, the anatomy of
mutual duplication.
In the second example, I have no affinity for your ideas on the
subject. The communication is one direction, which violates
one of the most fundamental laws of theta:
ALL COMMUNICATION LINES ARE APPARENT TWO-WAY
FLOWS. THIS IS BECAUSE COMMUNICATION IS A
MECHANICAL (on a via) WAY TO ACHIEVE DUPLICATION.
Duplication is at Static. The secret truth is that all theta is in
continuous perfect telepathic contact among its various
individuated parts. Any attempt to enforce a one way flow of
comm is a disaster.
Duplication occurs at two or more terminals, therefore the
physical universe apparency is of interchange along twodirectional comm lines. One-way flows go black and drop to
the bottom of the tone scale. This theta law is one that a
magician has to know and use, otherwise he gets himself in
trouble fast. There will ALWAYS be a backflow along a comm
line. ALWAYS. If force is used to create an apparent one-way
flow, then the backflow will be black.
If the second example sounds anything like the teaching
methods used in the Co$, I'm not sorry to rub anyone's nose
into the mess. It was LRH's mistake because he failed to
perceive that each major triangle was actually two triangles: a
white one and a black one. He should have perceived it
because he knew Magick, and must have known very well
that when summoning any basic universal force that the
negative side of that force must be bound FIRST, in order to
receive only the positive. (All primal forces in the universe are
arranged in a dichotomy with part at or near the top of the
tone scale and the other part at or near the bottom.) He failed
to bind the black triangles (the KRC also), and they devoured
him. To say it in Scn terms, he failed to confront the lower
I wish I knew how to use my software to draw enneagrams, one of which should accompany the
following explanation. If anyone can draw one for me, showing all the labels, it might be a benefit to
everyone on the discussion lists.
What is the height, length and width of our inner world?
I suggest (3)understanding (length), (6)manifestation (height) and (9)duplication (width)
It seems to me that the dimensions of our inner world, stated in words which apply to UNIVERSAL
CONSCIOUSNESS, i.e., at the highest level of "The As Above", are (3) infinite beingness, (6)
infinite empowerment and (9) infinite knowingness.
Stated in words which apply to MASS, i.e., at the lowest level of "The As Below", these become (3)
annihilation (6) maximised mass, (9) maximised mystery.
The universally applicable enneagram of Awareness, Will and Consciousness is connected to the
similarly universally applicable enneagram of Unawareness, Reactivity and Unconsciousness.
The connection (1) between love
and hate is the
affinity line.
The connection (2) between cause
and effect is the communication line.
The connecting (3) between knowledge and mystery is the
reality line.
The connecting (4) between objectivity and subjectivity is the goal line.
The connecting (5) between win/win and lose/lose is the
problem line.
The connecting (6) between beingness and solidity is the
mass line.
The connecting (7) between postulate and automaticity is the control line.
The connecting (8) between as isness and alter isness is the responsibility line.
The connecting (9) between empowerment and disempowerment is the knowingness line.
At each level of (9) the Know to Mystery Scale, confront involves continuously, come what may,
going clockwise around the diagram, handling whatever comes up, with no emphasis on either desire
or resistance, just living in the now, the true line of preference and least energy consumption.
Desire is a non confront of the fact that we have all we need, that the why is here, not there, and that
all we need to do is to handle whatever comes up, continuously turning out valuable final products of
consciousness as a consequence.
Resistance is a non confront of the fact that life is a challenge, involving risk and corresponding
opportunity, and that all we need to do is to handle whatever comes up, continuously turning out
valuable final products of consciousness as a consequence.
On the enneagram, any focus on DESIRE, instead of moving us effortlessly around the circle,
continuously shifts our attention from AFFINITY to GOALS to COMMUNICATION to
RESPONSIBILTY to PROBLEMS to CONTROL and back again to affinity.
On the enneagram, any focus on RESISTANCE, instead of moving us effortlessly around the circle,
continuously shifts our attention IN THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION TO DESIRE, from AFFINITY to
CONTROL to PROBLEMS to RESPONSIBILTY to COMMUNICATION to GOALS and back
again to affinity.
Each person has a chronic state of consciousness, from which they vary up and down the emotional
(thoughts attached to feelings) tone scale but very little around the circle of the enneagram. Those on
this discussion list are, I suspect, strongly at (6), questioning everything on which we focus our
attention. We desire to observe (3) realities and from them to arrive at (9) knowledge. We resistance
(3) unrealities by using our accumulated (9) knowledge to see them as they truly are.
Additionally, we may discover that each of us tends to slip into the wings (for us, the viewpoints of
control and problems).
Goal Problem Mass running, a dangerous but partially effective process done in the Church of
Scientology, is an over simplification of this stuff. By processing ourselves clockwise around the
enneagram circle, anti clockwise around the triangle, and in the directiion of confront around the criss
cross arrows, we can blow the whole incompetent Scientology GPM system into smithereens. I started
to do this with my wife some time ago and she had some of the biggest wins she had had for a very
long time. I didn't realise how important it was at the time or I would have continued the process after
her very good indicators and continual cognitions regarding the subject eventually disappeared.
Regards
John Lester
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Further selections from the writings of John Lester:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------(Please ignore my way of stating everything as if it is indisputably true. Doing so forces me to read
my own words in a more self critical and hopefully more beneficial manner than would otherwise be
the case.)
Affinity is a "theta like" Feeling Experience that includes a preference for being close to the subject of
the affinity.
Reality is a "flux like" phenomenon which is very different in both SCOPE and CONTENT between
any one person and any other. The reality generation PROCESS however, is assumed, for the purpose
of developing a mutual understanding, to be identical for all beings capable of generating any sort of
reality.
Any attempt at identifying, describing, defining or specifying any part of the process must eventually
align with the personal experience of every person who, on the basis of accepting mutual objectivity
as necessary for pan determined solutions, participates in the discussion.
Communication of one person's complete reality to another person is impossible, except in terms of
"bits and pieces" approximations. Every single perception experienced by a being is prioritised before
it even enters the awareness of the being. The disempowerment versus empowerment GPM process
has already begun its ARC versus ARC break work. The being is unconscious (unaware at any
conscious level) that this is happening.
It is the process of communication itself that continuously generates the same GPM (goals problems
mass) that Scientologists have been trained to regard as their worst enemy. It is in fact, a most
valuable mechanism, a misunderstood pearl which is the foundation of each persons creation of their
own reality. Only by understanding and duplicating this ongoing, low intensity, individuality and gpm
generation mechanism will it be mastered.
All communications are incomplete, because all that is ever received by the recipient is a superficial
awareness of source, distance, effect, attention, intention and duplication, with imagined but rarely
anything like complete understanding at the receipt point, of that which originated at the source point.
GPM division is "built into the system" in order to facilitate the development of individuality. All of
the apparent ill effects of GPM division may be overcome and converted into eventual unity in
diversity.
For example: In the case of an observably incomplete verbal communication, the intended recipient
may either feel and think pleasurably "Thank goodness they have shut up" or resentfully feel and
think "Why don't they finish what they were going to say" Its the recipient's GPM reinforced desire or
resistance to each communication with self or others that determines the nature and the existence of
the consequently experienced charge.
The recipient of such a verbal communication could just as easily recognise that the communicator
had decided not to complete the communication and prefer to leave it at that. Provided that the
recipient had no prior GPM and individuality pressurising beliefs and attitudes insisting that they get
an answer or insisting that they get the other person to shut up, there would only be a marginal
preference for hearing the whole of a message rather than half of it.
The conscious cultivation of a reality which includes many preferences (with desires and resistances
limited to the satisfaction of consciously pre determined and preferably formalised needs) provides
the basis for a more objectively pan determined and empowered life.
In the development of the "individuality supporting" but "pan determinism opposing" gpm, prior
beliefs and attitudes, current feelings and thoughts, plus available options and decisions, all motivated
by either desire or resistance, magnified by imagination and tolerated according to expectation,
together determine the magnitude of the charge.
The directly obvious king of the castle within this nine step GPM and individuality generation device
is belief. Two of the saboteurs are "the terminal of desire" (conveniently judged by Scientologists to
be the theta option) and "the opposition terminal of resistance" (conveniently judged to be the entheta
option). The third saboteur is the unpredictable (i.e., third step in the process) owner of the belief
system who, in obedience to the above describe belief dominated system, makes and implements the
pre programmed and "charge motivated" decision to go with either desire or with resistance. Only life
continues to say that there is still something not quite right.
Without the belief component, all the other belief system components would just not be there. An
attitude is nothing more than a belief as to how something should be viewed. A feeling is nothing
more than a current belief that something is being perceived. A thought is nothing more than a current
belief that lacks any desired or resisted component that might cause it to be classified as permanently
valuable.
A belief is a thought that has been determined as having lasting value. Similarly options, decisions,
desires, preferences, resistances, imaginations and expectancies all reflect variously classified but
quite specific beliefs.
Permanently installed beliefs and attitudes determine which feelings and corresponding thoughts are
automatically stimulated into existence.
At the same time, other permanently installed beliefs and attitudes determine the available options.
Any existing relevant desires or resistances then kick in, aided and abetted by similarly pre
programmed imaginations and expectancies. A decision is made, totally resulting from all these
various beliefs. The action or inaction which accompanies the decision initiates the next situation and
the whole reactive process repeats.
The only way that individual and universal independence from this mechanism may be achieved is by
updating all beliefs in a manner designed to optimise all possible situations. Such a belief system is
pan determined, with the "understanding" of the so called "clear" state being dumped in favour of the
far more effective and only really sustainable pan determined state.
This recommended state corresponds with the KRC triangle. The ARC triangle leads to personal
understanding, and because of that understanding of ones own reality, to the illusion of mutual
understanding.
The KRC triangle resolves the "Only One" illusion of personal understanding, by requiring the owner
of the belief system to proactively occupy so many viewpoints that any illusory aspects are
increasingly blown away.
Clear can never be more than a key out (maybe for a whole lifetime) because it doesn't have within its
grasp the capability of handling all the variables needed to really sustain a continuously self
determined and external impact free state. The rest of the universe isn't going to let self determinism
We are observably NOT created with the inherent ability to exercise much (1) Affinity, (2)
Communication, (3) Reality over (4) Goals, (5) Problems (6) Masses, but are learning to do so.
Our spiritual (7) Control, (8) Responsiblity and (9) Knowingness over the Actual Universe is pathetic,
with the Creator Sustainer looking after the details until enough of us see sense and tip the balance
towards OT lives. We all need to get real. The wisest thing we can realise is that we know practically
fuck all, yet have limitless potential.
Until such time as we learn how to create affinities, communications and realities which correspond
with how selves, realities and universes need to be created, we are stuck, very sensibly, exactly where
we are.
The Creator has been defined as omnipresence, omnipotence and omniscience. In terms of the
evolution of human consciousness, this is (7) Control, (8) Responsibility and (9)Knowingness. Unless
one is present one cannot control anything. Responsibility is the ability, willingness and felt obligation
to respond. Thus creating our selves, personal realities and personal universes in line with how we
really are is obviously the best way to go. All this negative crap just drops dead because it no longer
has a purpose.
The static could be imagined as being the hole in the middle of the triangle of (7) control, (8)
responsibility and (9)knowingness. The knowingness is the integrated sum of all universal principles.
Everything from total mystery to total knowingness would be known.
The ultimate goal for every human being is effortless aware will (7), (8) and (9).
The ultimate purpose for every human being is to climb the scale from mystery to knowingness.
The ultimate policy is to specify and continuously fulfil this purpose and achieve its goal.
The ultimate plan is a corresponding belief system
The ultimate program is a corresponding learning program.
The ultimate project is a corresponding lifestyle
The ultimate orders are the seven principles of effective evolution
The ultimate ideal scene is a challenging but nevertheless peaceful, joyful and successful life.
The ultimate statistic is.......
The ultimate valuable final product is.............
love
John
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------In accordance with our previously discussed enneagram cross section view of he tone scale, after
(1)affinity, (2) communication and (3) reality, the stable datum of understanding has been established.
This is the "thinking" component of something that has yet to come.
After (4) goals, (5) problems and (6) mass, the previously considered stable datum of "thinking"
becomes attached to whichever up tone or down tone "feeling" is associated with the success or
failure of the process. An emotion is the spiritual consequence of assigning a feeling to a thought. If
the process produced a spiritual loss, the person tends to resign from control, responsibility and
knowingness, instead dropping to a less personally controlled, less responsibility demanding and less
knowingness reliant lower tone level.
After (7) control, (8) responsibility and (9) knowingness, the "mass particle" remains assigned to the
chosen tone level, as a part of the persons cumulative consciousness. Irrespective of where the rest of
that multi mass particle consciousness may be, this particular bit remains at its assigned tone level.
The most probable scenario is one in which every thetan (effortless, individual, aware will, awake in
the void) has part of their mental, physical and spiritual synergy self, belief system, reality and
personal interpretation spread up and down the tone scale at every conceivable and inconceivable
level.
Every mass particle is an emotion (a thought stuck to a feeling) at a tone level which corresponds with
the effectiveness of the control, responsibility and knowingness used in putting it there. The
emotional tone scale is a list of possible locations for each and every mass particle in the persons
knowingly and unknowingly personally created self, personal belief system, personal realities and
personal universe.
The most powerful form of healing is consciousness healing. Understanding (ACRU), Experience
(GPM)and duplication (CRH) of the ACRGPMCRK enneagram and its relationships to the Mental,
Physical and Spiritual divisions of the Know to Mystery Scale, are enough to create real clears and
real OTs.
Applying the above to the highest accessible levels of each persons consciousness is the fastest and
most effective route. That will "As Is" lower levels on a wholesale basis, without even visiting them.
GPMs and BTs as heavy items - Forget it.
There may or may not be something to be said for discussing some of these initial thoughts with other
carefully selected, demonstrably OT individuals until we have ironed out the bugs and are in complete
agreement. Then we can hit the scene with an up and running mentally, physically and spiritually
grooved in package.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------...here is another opportunity to further explore the universal phenomenon of the triangle and the
"holistic description support" process of which it is the topmost organisational level map, not the
territory.
We are the Christ and AntiChrist map maker masters of holistic description support. Both you and I
represent, or are, the third sides of all triangles. Because we are two similar "third sides", and because
there have to be three "third sides" in the universe of the third Side (i.e., the spiritual universe of true
meaning or holistic definition), a third third side is made available for us to study. I suspect that the
responsibility for all third side creation lies with one of Gods deputies, otherwise known as the God of
Cartesian Geometry.
When, prior to consciousness, "the one" (me in this case) is subconsciously restimulated into a feeling
of affinity (high affinity in this case) by someone or something (you in this case) in ones personally
created and universally supported environment, they may, if they choose to do so, use that labelled
feeling (which is now an emotion or thoughtform, because it has been identified or labelled as
something perceived) as the first step on a new journey of discovery around The Holistic Description
Support Process enneagram.
How may the missing third side problem of the Christ and Anti Christ be resolved? What comes next?
Obviously it must be Communication. That takes us to the second of the nine steps to salvation. We
communicate through our mutually created and shared GPM, ending up with a Mutually Shared
Reality.
From our position on the third side of the first triangle in the three triangle enneagram, based upon
mutual agreement, we set goals (step 4), encounter problems (5) and finish up with (6) the mass of
adequately valuable, disappointingly valueless or inspiringly valuable final products.
Changing into higher gear (uptone), lower gear (down tone) or staying in the same gear, we are into
(7) control (using the product). Using as much (8) responsibility as is possible at our particular
position on the tone scale, we finish up with the same, more, or less (9) knowingness.
Garnerian magic reflects (1) Do what thou wilt (2) Doing what thou wilt (3) Discovering that (1)
should have been written "Do what thou wilt and harm to none".
Active Love can be compared to the positive, masculine, highly thought through but unfeeling, just do
it, Scientology like DO WHAT THOU WILT.
Passive Love can be compared to the negative, feminine, highly felt through but inadequately thought
through, nurturingly be it, Eastern philosophy like BE WHAT YOU ARE.
Active and passive love are two sides of a triangle, etc. etc.
Trust in belief systems allows you to experience the foolishness of trust.
Trust in universal principles allows you to experience the value of trust.
Two more triangles that need to be balanced.
The first side of all triangles relates to the specification of requirements and provisions.
The second side of all triangles relates to the implementation of requirements and provisions.
The third side of every triangles relates to the management of change.
Every time you perceive and label a perception, you start work with a newly created entity.
Every entity has potential mass which becomes real mass the moment that you disagree with your
own previous labelling of it. You then have created your own little GPM.
An Avatar Master (especially one with a Scientology background like me) teaches others thoughtform
creation and discreation. An Avatar is a person trained by an Avatar Master, who is able to create and
discreate thoughtforms. The standard Avatar initiation process familiarises budding Avatars with the
creation and discreation of thoughtforms, including All That Is.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Tue, 23 Jan 2001, From: "John Lester" <lifemaster@talk21.com>
Just today I was thinking to myself that "as long as one has a self determined belief system one cannot
be more than self determined person" In other words, the opposite of a Clear is an OT ?. The entire
illusion of "self" needs to be replaced by the greater reality of individuality or undividability. Maybe
even an individualised trinity in which each OT chooses their own three eternal qualities (which could
of course be changed at any time because they would still only be beliefs. But at least they would be
senior to the ridiculous and isolation making concept of "self". If ever there was an implant it was the
idea of self.
We talked about the three aspects of Control, Responsibility and Knowledge (the last of which I
incorrectly labelled knowingness). You considered that the order should be Control, Knowledge,
Responsibility. This cannot be so however, because the middle quality is always the most demanding
(e.g. communication, problems and responsibility in their respective triangles. The third quality has
always a spiritual, static or unchanging quality about it (e.g. reality, mass, knowledge in their
respective triangles). The triangle into which Control, Responsibility and Knowledge transmute is
therefore maybe Beingness, Knowingness and Power.
There is something still not sorted in this arrangement however. I have reason to belive that the third
triangle in each completed enneagram becomes the first triangle in the next enneagram up. The
Empowered Static as the valuable final product of evolution is (Beingness, Knowingness and Power).
This must then manifest as something that is even more demanding. I suggest that it is likely to be a
higher octave of Understanding (Affinity, Communication and Reality), a higher octave of Physical
Manifestation (Goals, Problems and Masses) and a higher octave of Operating Thetan (Control,
Responsibility and Knowledge).
Since then I have realised that (Affinity, Communication and Reality) manifests as (Goals, Problems
and Masses), the elimination of which yields (Control, Responsibility and Knowledge), all nine of
which transmute into the previously non existent quality of "knowingness". This replaces the previous
quality of consciousness, so that the next higher trinity is Knowingness, Beingness and Power ??????,
none of which involve physicality, except as potential.
Belief Systems
Belief Systems
All that is ever keyed out or erased are personally created and personally accepted
interpretations of actuality, plus an infinite number of combinations of these. The truth
remains the actuality it always was, before each person interpreted it as essential to the
"desire versus resistance" balancing of their particular belief system.
For each person, satisfaction is maximised by interpreting each and every actual situation
in whichever way corresponds most closely with their already established belief system.
Truth doesn't come into any belief system unless the person concerned has realised that
actuality (as directly and physically perceived truth) is a more stable datum than any
belief system.
As long as anyone relies totally upon their belief system they remain firmly in the shit,
with no possibility of ever getting out of it because they are relying on interpretations
rather than observations. Only truth sets you free.
All that you ever create (individually) is interpretations. Mutually observable things can
never be keyed our or erased; only individually or mutually agreed considerations about
them.
Considerations are made up of beliefs and attitudes, perceptions and thoughts, choices
and decisions, all meticulously and reactively integrated and driven by the force of want
(including both desires and resistance), the ability to imagine, and the power of
expectancy.
Creating "what you wish was there" is a valuable experience in learning to be and act like
a god but eventually everyone will discover that the process can be flattened and replaced
by the more effective process of direct perception and acceptance of "All That Is" as
being exactly what it is, namely All That Is. "All that isn't" is illusion, although it seems
very real (and very much as if it is) when you are in the middle of it. As human beings,
we live in a universe consisting of "All That Is" (i.e. the physical), plus "All That Isn't
(i.e. the mental), plus "All That Makes It Possible" (the static or spiritual).
The reality (synergy of scenarios) that each person mentally creates is a highly personal
and highly expedient interpretation, automatically programmed by each person to make
the most sense of this mixture of physical objectivity, mental imagination and unmanifest
circumstatially demonstrable "static" or spiritual.
Car accidents, getting shot, sickness, death, bodies needing food, shelter, clothes, etc. are
consequences of our physical existence, which involves the three repetitive steps of self
chosen belief system creation (and alignment), corresponding self chosen doingness and
corresponding (but not directly self chosen) consequences.
The only way that such a universally applicable process provides short term satisfaction
is by relying totally upon a combination of fear based, socially based and logically based
belief systems.
The only way that such a process provides long term satisfaction is to recognise and
handle (as potential opportunities) the problems posed by fear based, socially based and
logically based systems but to carefully and systematically make them less fear based,
less socially dominated, more socially supportive and far more logically based.
As all beliefs involving fear, social domination and willy nilly logic fall into alignment
with directly observed "All That Is" and out of alignment with highly imaginative "All
That Isn't", then the hidden omniscience, omnipotence and omnipresence of The Static
becomes increasingly more obvious.
Individuality and the static are certainly postulated somethingnesses, but as with all
postulates, they relate to belief system interpretations, not to actualities. The rule
remains the way it has always been, namely that mutually physically observable things
cannot be discreated, only obsolete elements of belief systems.
Observing what you, yourself, are actually being and doing will only support the asisness or erasure of belief system elements that, after due consideration, you realise
are obsolete and replacable by something better.
Every ability is associated with a corresponding responsibility and a corresponding
power. Some abilities invite the misuse of power more than others. The responsibility
level and power associated with the ability to teleport would certainly provide
hummanity with more problems than are needed at this time. All thoughts, desires and
imaginations relating to super human powers are indications of a belief system which is
focused on escaping from life rather than handling it. Inherent abilities only manifest
when the time is ripe. The ability to be responsible is a pre requisite.
The KRC triangle is only a trap if you don't understand and to some extent duplicate
how it affects your life. The CoS (LRH) didn't invent any of the so called Scientology
triangles. They don't "belong" to anyone and never will.
It is actually the Scientology promotion of the ARC triangle that, through the
affinities, realities, communications and understandings that each Scientologist
allowed himself or herself to establish whilst they were in the C of S, have left each
Scientologist in the vulnerable position of having ARC breaks of long duration, such
as those in which many so called free zoner Scientologists are still stuck. That is why
some Freezoners imagine that there is some sort of value in attacking the blissfully
ignorant and continually self satisfied C of S.
The most significant outpoint, so far as the C of S is concerned, is the complete lack of
attention to the KRC triangle, for whereas the ARC triangle is "the way in", the KRC
triangle is the way through and out.
The C of S tech. is deficient and completely unethical because it fails to show how
ARC pulls in the entire Curiosity, Desire, Enforce, Inhibit, No ("pretend it doesn't
exist") and Resistance sequence, and, apart from enabling its willing victims (pcs, clears
and pre OTs) to identify the exact shit into which they have got themselves (which
makes each of them subject to the Bridge denial blackmail phenomenon) it does
nothing to help them out of it. That is the C of S trap.
Each ARC break should be handled, not merely to FNs, VGIs and Cognitions, but to
restored ability to "willingly Control", "take Responsibility" and "achieve
Knowingness".
The entire purpose of my metaphysical model is to facilitate the As Ising of my entire
belief system including, last but not least, the metaphysical model itself and the concepts
of Thetan Control, Responsibility and Knowingness and Creator Omnipotence,
Omnipresence and Omniscience upon which it is based.
--John Lester
(Edited from an email message by Ouran)
The worst thing is that hubris stops the spiritual student cold.
There is no further progress made by a person who is
enforcing a Self which cannot tolerate an effect upon it by
others. Such a person gets no case gain from any further
counciling. They won't allow it, because they won't allow
another person to be Cause, Source, etc.
I know what I'm talking about here, I personally plowed face
first into hubris about four years ago. I started thinking I was
hot shit. I had to keep reminding myself that I was no bigger,
no different than any other person. But I was also educated
enough to recognize it as a trap, so I kept digging, didn't treat
it as an end phenomenon of a process called "Point to God"
(joke) or any such foolishness.
I recently (8/30/00) ran across an internet conversation
between Ralph Hilton and Ken Ogger on this very subject. I
would be very remiss if I didn't include it here:
Ralph posted the following question > I don't perceive that anyone on XXXXX or who is running a "Clearing
> tech" group is fully able to grant beingness to terminals of
> comparable magnitude. Sometimes it seems to me that some actually
> believe that there aren't any. Perhaps there are exceptions. I have
> yet to meet one. I met a few in EST but never isolated the key factor
> that Werner partially resolved and Hubbard didn't seem to get close
> to. Nor, obviously, a way of translating it into Scientologese.
>
> I've been looking for a simple approach to this factor. Any ideas?
back to index
signs. Half of the signs of the zodiac deal with forms (earth)
and particles (air); and the other half deals with positive
motion (fire) or negative emotion (water). From an oldfashioned conventional point of view the fire and water signs
are what is known as "feeling"; and the air and earth signs are
what is known as "mental". All energy seems to exist in a form
that we interpret as either a particle or a wave. It's not that the
universe is truly either one, but human beings, with our limited
perception, translate what we see in terms of one or the other.
The only difference between these two, that is apparent to
me, is that of velocity relative to the observer. Energy that is
stationary relative to the observer appears to be a particle (A
completely stationary particle appears to be without energy,
and a moving wave appears to be without locationremember
Heisenbergs Uncertainty Principle!). The faster energy
streams past the observer, the more it appears to be in the
form of waves. This particular mental division in perceiving
the universe is symbolized in astrology by the signs Virgo and
Pisces.
Virgo and its ruler (NOT mercury, perhaps one or more of the
asteroids) are connected with and rule the limited perception
of matter as discrete particles having an exact location in
space and finite boundaries.
Virgo seems to be involved with energy viewed in the form of
precise lumps: protons, neutrons, electrons, mental energy
shaped into little bits, i.e. thoughts. (I don't know how many of
you reading this will have any experience at doing
"meditation", but a close examination of thoughts inside your
own space [i.e. in your head, for most of you] will reveal them
to be either pictures [a field of wavesruled by Pisces] or little
bits of stuff [ruled by Virgo] that you manipulate and attach
meaning onto.)
Pisces and its ruler neptune are connected with and rule the
Cancer
Leo
Scorpio
Sagittarius
Pisces
Gemini
Virgo
Libra
Capricorn
Aquarius
explosion
confusion
implosion
The mutable signs most closely mirror spirit itself because a
slow "explosion" of energy is a spherical glowexactly what a
located beingness appears to be.
Fixed signs represent energy movements that have
conflicted directly with one another so as to form a standing
wave or mass, i.e. resembling "solid" matter.
(RIDGES)
or
or
or
space.
A flow is the most basic action of doingness, from one
location in space toward a second location. On a very high
"plane" this relates to the number TWO. This is basic to
dichotomies of opposites such as black/white, good/evil, etc.
A ridge forms a solid mass and is therefore the most basic
manifestation of havingness. On a very high "plane" this
relates to the number THREE. when one reaches THREE, the
opposing terminal of TWO switches to THREE and TWO
becomes occupied by a flux or changing process instead.
The Four Mental Signs
The four dispersal signs of Gemini, Virgo, Sagittarius and
Pisces each rule a particular way of thinking and relating
ideas. The four styles of mentation are: differentiation (this is
different from that), association (this is similar to that),
identification (this is that, A = A), and disassociation (this has
no relation to that).
Virgo differentiates
Gemini associates
Pisces Identifies
Sagittarius disassociates
Virgo notices the littlest details of differences between things.
A shrimp fork has a different number of tines than a salad
fork.
Gemini locates similarities between things, sorts and
classifies halfway between differences and identities. A Ford
and a Chevy are both associated by their being cars.
Pisces says that one thing IS another. A coffee cup is a coffee
cup. Here is both the fairly high level action of assuming an
identity in order to play a game, and also the stimulus-
"")
Aries:
Here the flow is outward from the point of view. This is very
simple and direct, which is Aries in a nutshell.
Taurus:
Leo has a strong outflow from self, but this is met by a flow
from others. This flow from others could in good cases be
mere attention -- or it could be opposition -- but in either case
the Leo goes more solid.
Virgo:
It's easy to see from this diagram why Virgos seem to wear
microscopes for eyeglasses! But it also indicates a marvelous
ability to view the smallest things in detail from all sides.
Libra:
released a tone scale which went any higher than tone 40.
And this in spite of knowing that tone 40 was a stable resting
point similar to Conservatism, and therefore a ridge!
One hell of a mistake! Without recognizing the unity of all life
and beingness, one will continue to oppose others -- after all,
they are NOT yourself, right? Wrong!
Here's a quote of Mr Hubbard from PDC #6, for illustration
and critical purposes (this constitutes "fair use"):
"People have had the idea that when you got up there along top..
of course, you know you have to kind of get up there a little bit and
take a look to see if there's anything much higher, and.. uh..
people have had the idea that this.. this.. ah.. there was just a main
body of theta and everybody became one when you got to the top
of the tone scale. Fortunately, that isn't true. Yeah. But you go
down tone scale and everybody becomes one and the oneness is
MEST. And there's no individuality whatsoever in MEST."
makes sense: the many is the one, but the one remains the
many even while being one!
Four paragraphs up I mentioned in passing that opposing
others was a mistake, because all beings are one. This datum
underlies the phenomena of "overt acts." Deep down and far
back in the past, the cause of all case is a lack of integrity.
The history of the whole track is a gradual process of the
disintegration of beings into fragments. Much of processing
and meditation is aimed at reintegrating beings. All harm done
is harm against self. That is why the overt act against others
has such aberrative power: the other guy is you too. And I do
NOT communicate that fact at Sympathy on the tone scale,
where most religions seem to place it. That's another lower
level mockery, like serenity of Death being a lower level
mockery of Serenity of Beingness. I'm saying it in the Know
range on the tone scale, communicated through this body
which is currently at Strong Interest as an organism.
Another critical mistake he made was taking the apparency as
the reality. This mistake in perception resulted in picking up
various approaches to case, trying them out, then abandoning
them in favor of a new, "better" flavor. His engineer style
practicality never allowed him to discover all of the
fundamentals on which case, universes and minds are based - though admittedly he got a lot of them.
Another aspect of his taking the apparency as the reality is
that he declared that a person was "at" a single tone on the
scale. Admittedly, when stuck deep in the muck, that is how it
looks. Part way out is a higher apparency (of archetypical
structure) that a person occupies a position in each of these
bands: upper Thought, middle Thought, lower Thought (lower
astral plane), Emotion, Effort, and Mystery (unconsciousness
and matter). Each position reacts against the ones
immediately above and below it. For example an emotion is
Ouran
back to index
Ah but with all that, the adept was still quite human! To put it
in Scio terms, the adept had increased self-determinism, but
was still well short of pan-determinism.
Between the second and third sections was something called
the "Abyss." The nature of the abyss was cloaked in mystery
and terror! It was dangerous! Blah blah blah... Sounds a little
like the confidential levels in the Co$, doesn't it? Trust me, the
abyss was dangerous to them, but far less dangerous than
not confronting it. All the abyss really was, is the gap between
being human and being god. And therein lay the horrible
danger! For these magicians had thrown off the chains of
Christianity, and with those the Christian humility. And forget
it, they didn't have Scio Grade 4 to handle their tendencies to
make themselves right by making others wrong. Therefore
these poor bastards hurled themselves into the abyss trying
to get from human consciousness to divine consciousness
with full baggage of Grades case intact.
In the third and highest section of the Magickal system, the
"surrender of self" which begins by entering the Abyss is
completed. I consider their term "surrender" to be unfortunate,
because it places the aspirant at effect instead of cause, but I
can understand their motivation for using the term. Anyone
attempting to reach a divine consciousness without the
benefit of a full Grades release (which they didn't have access
to) would -- instead of attaining a pure divinity -- merely gain
power while clinging stubbornly to the precious "self". By "self"
here I do NOT mean beingness, I mean limited materialistic
identity and personality. Any magician who empowers "self"
while not also becoming and empowering others ends up
becoming what is known as a "black" magician.
What happened was that they usually grew egos as big as all
outdoors, all "Me, me, me, I'm right and all of you are wrong
and need to be taught by me!" They were sure they had made
it, and were usually mistaken. (For further on this read "The
Hubris Trap.")
To give Crowley his due, he may have made it. He certainly
behaved as though he did in his later life. But it's also very
possible that he may have been fooling himself. Always
remember that the man was trained in a system which used
enslaved entities on a regular basis as part of its practices.
Someone(s) must have made it, or at least keyed out enough
to cognite on the area, otherwise why would the Magician's
initiation be arranged like that? But what had they seen?
What were they after? What was this supreme state to which
they were instructed to aspire with such devotion?
I know. I've seen it. I've been there for a few timeless instants
of calm and immense love.
It's described in the upper end of Filbert's Expanded Tone
Scale! Those old magicians reached the tones above 100.0
on the scale. Up around "Truth", "Awareness" to "Multiple
Deity" it's easy from there to see "Single Deity", which is the
unity of all theta. At Single Deity is true pan-determinism. At
Single Deity all games are playing with yourself.
Above that is Native State. Has anyone made it to Native
State, then come back from Native State to tell us that we can
get all the way out of the trap? Gautama said he did. I really
don't know if Gautama did; the old tales were passed down by
word of mouth and finally written down hundreds of years
after he died. But if you read the Pali language texts, that's
what they claim.
I didn't get that far. I didn't even make it to Single Deity; I
merely got close enough to see Single Deity. And do you
know who Single Deity is? Forget "God", it's you and I. All of
us.
Ouran
back to index
updated 4/21/01
relief that someone else had seen it too: second from the top,
"Single Deity."
Part of the chain reaction of cognitions I had as a result of
perceiving Single Deity 320.0 (Static) was that I gained an
entirely new understanding of communication (see: The
Nature of Communication). All communication turns out to be
telepathic. And telepathy is duplication. And duplication is
DONE AT SINGLE DEITY! Every person understands what
another person is intending to say only because they
duplicate that intention very high on the tone scale, at the
point where both persons are the SAME BEING.
The next cognition in the chain was that since I was operating
that high on the tone scale... and I looked and realized I was
operating at several other locations on the tone scale.
Sheesh! It blew me away! I was duplicating at 320.0,
perceiving truth at 100.0, enjoying and creating aesthetics at
70.0, creating artistic inspiration at 60.0, making postulates at
30.0, imposing considerations just below that, making
opinions at 22.0, feeling thrills and exhilaration as a being at
the top of the emotion band, motivating my body from
conservatism to cheerfulness, touching areas in my mind
which felt like they were in apathy .05 or below, flowing effort
band energy to move the matter of my body, doing "efforts to
think" just below that, creating "thought forms" (see below)
somewhere in that area, and finding things in hiding which
didn't wish to be found even farther down.
The whole tone scale was mine to use. That cognition
changed my entire outlook. I stopped worrying about where I
"was" on the tone scale and concentrated instead on
expanding my ability to access the entire thing consciously.
As a side note I want to point out that various tones are taken
simultaneously by us, separated by wide enough gaps
between them to provide a flow of energy (between the
... don't make the mistake of thinking that you're everybody else. You'd only be
a small percentage. Maybe one in a billion. But the galaxy is large and even
that ratio might mean that you are millions of different people. We used to
operate this way on the early track, but we were aware of doing it.
Yes you are. Just keep in mind that even though you are god,
so is everyone else, lest you fall into the Hubris Trap. These
processes if practiced can cure any being of hubris.
The end phenomenon of these processes is a happy state
where others are loved by you and important to you in a very
relaxed, calm way. Any attempt to fake and service fac one's
way into a false attest of this state would be easy to spot: the
faker would remain selfish, and the love could only be faked
at Covert Hostility which in turn would be prone to expressing
it as Sympathy. Also an attempt to fake this release would
result in a collapse of a person's space and a harsh trip
INSIDE/OUTSIDE
One of the most fundamental aberrations of a being is the
idea of self. We didn't used to insist so strongly that our
personal identities were separate, but over a vast gulf of times
we each have built up an armor of identity with which we
enforce our individuation from one another. The primary
means of enforcing self is the identification of each being's
separate awareness -- in the classic A = A manner -- with
whatever symbol, mask, field of energy and/or body each
uses as a terminal for others to communicate with. By saying
"I am _____" then filling the blank with the terminal (for
example "I am this body"), each being set up an outer limit to
what was considered to be itself. The tendency became one
of only being that body, only viewing from that body, only
being responsible for the effects caused by that body.
Problem is, a being is much much larger than that. At and
above Postulates on the Expanded Tone Scale the being
decides meaning into large spaces outside and beyond its
mere body. (As an aside let me point out again that the action
of a being in creating a symbol in its mind is fundamentally
the same as when it makes a postulate and impresses that
postulate onto the physical universe. When making a thought
symbol in the mind one creates a small bit of mass and
assigns meaning to it. A symbol is defined as an object
having mass plus mobility plus meaning. [This gives us a new
triangle: col 1 - meaning, col 2 - mobility, col 3 - mass] This is
exactly how a person thinks in the sub-death range of -3.0 to 4.0. A small mobile bit of mass is created and a meaning is
attached/assigned to it. These bits of mass are then arranged,
sorted, strung out in series', etc. in order for the normal
person to "think." At Postulates a being does the same action
on a wider scale. To impress a postulate upon all of physical
own, and even access anything and everything that was ever
done in this or any universe (this has been called "reading the
akashic record"). It's been said that all life is connected. It's
been said that all theta is connected. It would be more
accurate to say instead that all beingness is one beingness at
the top of the tone scale.
So how big is a "self?" If a would-be victim can bring a serial
killer to it from 70 miles away, that's a pretty good reach,
viewed from a "normal" and "reasonable" perspective. But
how can that victim bring the killer? By postulate? That's
merely a via. By beingness? Ah, there's the rub! How many
bodies is the victim controlling? Two? Its "own" and the
killer's?
So just how big IS a being? I mean REALLY?
I know. Size, reach and identity become irrelevant at the
Static (Single Deity - 320.0). But stepping down from there a
bit, in more practical terms a being can and does assign
meaning to the entirety of reality. In more down to earth terms
that anyone can use, you can walk your body around on this
planet -- say, walk down the street and be your body, be the
sidewalk, be the kitten watching from the window, be the
shrewd, slightly evil intentioned crow flapping above, be the
oak tree growing in the yard, be it all. Why would "you" be a
human body any more than you would be the pigeon sitting
on the building ledge?
There is no inside or outside.
Ouran
back to index
(latest update 8/06/01) gold = main scale aqua = know to mystery scale red = Beingness scale white
= boundaries formed by decision
Scale is necessary for study of this page. Study that first. Keep in mind
when reading this page that egos are irrelevant. This is not about me, or
LRH, or any other being which says "I." This page is about the
knowledge we all possess within us concerning the structures of our
minds and shared universes. So the more viewpoints the better. Reality
is never about any single "me" -- the "Cosmic All", as Doc Smith used to
phrase it, can not be seen from only one point of view.
All three major scales of Know to Mystery, Affinity (Emotional tones, etc)
and Be -- plus all other scales -- are united within TOTAL EXISTENCE
at the top. They have a unity at the bottom too, which exists despite the
horror of everything being fragmented there -- but it is a unity of NOTBE, ABSOLUTE HATE and UNKNOWABLE as TOTAL NONEXISTENCE. Every action identified as occurring above where a spirit
is located on the scale is still there, but out of sight. So for instance at
the tone Considerations the spirit is still making a postulate, and above
that a decision, whenever it has a consideration. With an emotional tone
(such as Enthusiasm for example) there is a fixed attitude (actually an
attitude is a solidified opinion), above which is a fixed consideration,
above which is a prior postulate, above which is a decision. It's merely
that the higher actions are usually out of view. Reality itself appears
different at different points on the scale (Perceptions of Reality) Please
note that the "bands" (from Theosophy) are only a convenience, as
these bands blend into one another. More important than the
Theosophical bands are the decision points in white. These are points
of shift and change which create great cumulative damage on the way
down, or intense relief when passed through in session on the way up.
Within the span of the grand scale formed by TOTAL EXISTENCE vs
TOTAL NON-EXISTENCE lie all our scales and triangles, not to
mention all of our universes. Checking the archetypal area I find that
every major triangle is based on a dichotomy, and forms a scale
between the poles of the dichotomy. This scale between poles of the
dichotomy is expressed through the third item of the triangle (see
GD7.html for a list), which resolves habitually to one or the other pole.
Many of the dichotomies behind these triangles are found in GD38.html,
with the important ones correlated to the tone scale. The tone scale, the
dichotomies, and the triangles form a system which is the basis of
Here are many values, which have their origin in the tone
above. Here are fundamental reasons why in a universe.
Here are "this is good", "this is bad", "this follows that" and
"this object's purpose is", and thus the most primal
underpinnings of values and logic regarding creations -especially of thought -- are at this tone. The basics of
mathematics were formed at this level. Various codes are
+28 Considerations
A consideration is after the fact of postulation. You are no
longer being it perfectly, but may become it at will in order to
know it or act on it. If Postulates is viewing the as-isness, then
Considerations is viewing the alter-isness (at tone 80) which
forms an apparent state of isness. (LRH's four types of "isness" found in his Phoenix Lectures are a trifle misleading.
Three of them -- as-isness, alter-isness and not-isness -- are
VERBS [and form an important primal triangle], that is to say
they are actions taken by theta. The fourth -- isness -- is a
NOUN, and is the result of actions taken to produce a stable
creation.)
+26 Apparencies Are Reality
Accepting the results of creation as real. One no longer sees
the reality behind the universe, and instead takes the
apparency as being the reality, which is the viewed
consideration (the tone just above it).
+24 Universes
The playing fields are finished apparencies. But note this is a
plural. A Being exists in multiple universes. The entire area
between tone 40 (Perfect Affinity) and Universes is the
formation of spaces.
The reality of this band has the appearance of points in an
otherwise empty space.
(Objective viewpoint boundary, end of pervaded realities, first
use of mental not-is. Affinity scale begins to strongly manifest
itself below here because of the decisions to not be in the
same space with viewpoints, energies and objects -- therefore
the forming decision is: NO-PERVASION. This distance
creates the need for affinity.)
K-M: Lookingness -- has lowered affinity. There is now
distance between self and what is known, i.e., the thetan in
our daily attention, I'm certain that it's far less important than the fact
that an individuated POV begins at Games/Play/Opinions and continues
down through this band. My descriptions of the body tones are
deliberately cursory. Full explanations of them are found in the writings
of LRH. The best practical book on them to date, however, has a
different author: Ruth Minshull's "How to Choose Your People". Edmond
Meadows of the Viking Remote Viewing and Psychic Self-Defence site
had this observation:
Survival for all.
Enthusiasm.
Interest.
Conservatism.
Boredom.
Survival for self.
Antagonism.
Anger.
Concealed hostility.
Fear.
Survival for no one.
Sympathy.
Propitiation.
Grief.
Death.
The reality of the Emotion band has the appearance of energy emitted
from and/or moving toward (a soliditied view of) the points in space
seen in the lower Thought band, these then acting as terminals for the
flows, ridges and dispersals.
K-M: Emotingness -- is certainty through feeling. This is
observed in people feeling that something is right or wrong.
This "know" via feeling is filtered through whatever emotional
tone they are occupying.
+8 Exhilaration Affinity triangle: affinity, communication,
reality
(Wheeee!!! Just try staying wholly inside your body at this
tone! Hee hee!) I do not perceive Filbert's Courage at all, and
+0.96 Terror
Run away.
+0.94 Numb
Caught!
+0.9 Sympathy.
A flow.
+0.8 Propitiation
Selectively pays off others.
+0.5 Grief
At low volume this is sadness. Relieves part of charge by
expressing a caved-in responsibility for the failure. Is molded
by motion.
+0.375 Making Amends
Will give anything.
+0.3 Undeserving
Making self smaller.
+0.2 Self Abasement
Making self as small as possible.
+0.1 Victim
+0.07 Hopeless
+0.05 Apathy
Effort begins dominating. Is pierced by motion. A ridge.
+0.03 Useless
+0.01 Dying
0.0 Death
Physical death, and also abandonment of opinion and attitude
acquired at the Objective Viewpoint Boundary
(Games/Play/Opinions). Not only is this tone "leaving the
body" it is also "entering the body." A dispersal. Death is
usually viewed as the end of a cycle. But as it is a dispersal, it
is really the beginning of a new cycle of action.
(Disassociation boundary -- beginning of increasing
elsewhereness, forced behavior, and gradual takeover by
entities.)
EFFORT BAND NOT-HAVE
This band is characterized by physical sensations (including pain), the
energy frequencies used to operate a body, human thoughts as they
occur in a brain, and the assignment of meaning to mental shapes by
visualization (otherwise known as Symbolizingness). An effort is below
death. Matter in the universe is below death on the tone scale. That
includes the matter of "living" flesh, which is why it normally takes effort
to move a body. All actions are reactions and resistances. These tones
are psychotic. Here are automatic circuits and programmed animal
instincts which operate as (using LRH's quaint term) "demon circuits."
Effort actually begins taking over around Apathy as emotion gradually
shades into effort. Emotion is finally gone at Punishing Bodies. For
convenience's sake I'm placing this band right below Death.
-0.05 Failure
It's dead. Separation. (I'm dead)
-0.1 Pity
Poor dead body.
-0.2 Regret
I wish it was alive.
-0.3 Accountable
I'm responsible.
-1 Blame
"They're responsible" and/or "I'm responsible". This is seeing
the tone emotionally. When viewed from within the effort band
this area of 0.0 to -1 has the appearance of Total
Responsibility! Please understand that emotion and effort
cross over/overlap in this area. this is the top of the KRC
triangle!
K-M: Effortingness -- know through (re)action. Also means
"feel" to many people, but it's a certainty which feels robotic
and mechanical to me.
-1.4 Punishing Objects (Bodies)
The effort is now solid enough to motivate (as in a "motivator")
action. Overt action.
-1.5 Controlling Objects (Bodies)
Enter them and make those wrong bodies act right.
-2.2 Protecting Objects (Bodies)
Cave in on failed overts and failed control.
K-M: Thinkingness -- is an "effort to think" and is roughly the
level at which thinking with a brain occurs. I've examined this
level of knowing meticulously through eastern meditation
technique, and I would like to report that a Thinkingness
thought consists of a speck of effort level energy with a bit of
meaning attached to it. These then are strung in rows,
manipulated in various ways, and used in interaction with the
brain. This is a very peculiar process to watch. The calm,
rational knowing is attached to particles which are then
manipulated. It is literally a combination of Thought band and
Effort band activity. By definition then, a Thinkingness thought
is a symbol as defined by LRH, as it possesses mass,
meaning and mobility. But the mass is small and nondescript.
-3 Owning Objects (Bodies)
objects in it.
EVIL BAND NOT-BE
The Evil band is characterized by "other-consciousness". This is the
transfer of one's beingness to others, sort of the ultimate in
irresponsibility. But it's more than that at Spiritual Death. There it is the
splitting or fragmentation of consciousness which was created high on
the scale at Individuality, whose result fell to the bottom. Therefore
one's consciousness as other "individuals" (what Rowland Barkley calls
"source self" in the L13 materials) is at Spiritual Death. Another name
for the tone could be "Being Other Individuals" because that's where
that beingness has fallen to. The Evil band exhibits such extreme
PTSness that reality itself goes to pieces at all levels. Geoffrey Filbert
did a great job of describing it in "Excalibur Revisited":
A suppressive person sees everyone as an enemy attacking them and
they don't see the physical universe as it is. They are dealing with their
dub-in of the physical universe. A suppressive person is surrounded by
entities and identities other than what you or I see. A suppressive
person is stuck on the time track and is totally back there in another
time and space. ... they are not responsive to treatment of any type;
they refuse auditing; they cannot confront their own minds (they go into
fits over it); they are terrified at the idea of looking at a mind; ... they will
not complete cycles of action (because they have time and space
collapsed up); ... they will uniformly support destructive groups; they
destroy decent groups; they will approve of bad actions and inhibit
constructive actions; they consider help to be bad and harm to be good;
... they will consider ownership to be a pretension and that no one really
owns anything; ... they have a tremendous feeling of importance and
dominance quite often; ... they won't get off any tone arm action.
From this description of an SP by Filbert (most of which would seem to
be the tone Delusions) a number of characteristics of this band can be
seen: solidity of identities, expansion by destruction of others, inverted
intentions which all boil down to an intention to not be, and from this
latter intent comes no case gain in session.
This band like all the other bands is present in every person, whether
also the "dark soul" level from which group minds function. In
Ifa divination, this is called Oyeku.
The Bottom
Here are all opposition items, the greatest of which creates
the span of this scale. First, foremost (in the beginning, now
and forever, blah, blah, you know the drill...) of these is NOTEXIST. Also: NOT-KNOW (Unknowable), NOT-BE, Absolute
Hate, Can't Do, Can't Have, No Communication, No Reality,
No Thought, No Memory, etc. In other words, the three great
triangles are crashed. Total NOT-IS. The goals of GPMs are
here too when looked at from above. please take note that
this is a false bottom, it is a bottom for beings. Beings are
created too. So once this area is cleaned up and DO replaces
the polarized BE and HAVE, then the actual bottom at -100
comes into view.
Additional notes:
Max Sandor indicates to me that The Bottom is also a route to
the top. His contention is roughly in line with my observations
and the theoretical basis on which I build this scale. Roughly.
I see it this way: it should be possible for a thetan who has
contacted and is aware of his own top level, to hold the top
and bottom simultaneously -- thereby duplicating the entire
span of reality within the decision to exist. This might resolve
all universes existing between the poles of EXIST and NOTEXIST. Or perhaps not, but it's worth a look. For processing
purposes the PC locates, dates and resolves the precise
decisions made which equate top scale items (such as Native
State & affinity) with the bottom scale items. These bottom
items are: not-know, not-be, total hate, can't have, can't do,
no reality (which is agreement), no communication, no
thought, no memory, no awareness, no self, no identity, no
space, impossible, hopeless, nothing there, it can't be done, I
am without energy, my motion is impossible, etc. My only
caution concerning this view is that I have observed many
PERCEPTIONS OF REALITY
In the Causal band below Native State (tones 320 to 120) everything is perceived as beings. Including
"solid" matter (Which does not look in any way solid, merely asleep... unless the decision is made to
wake some of it -- in which case it will no longer seem to be matter anymore.).
In the Thought band (tones 100 to 21) reality is perceived as postulates near the top, then
considerations below that. These are usually expressed as beauty, goodness, rightness and purity.
Matter appears not at all dense, but it does have some light substance.
From Opinions (tone 20) down to Death (tone 0) reality is perceived as points of view concerning
affinity, communication and reality. Matter feels liquid and malleable in the upper range. Effort
begins at Antagonism (tone 2) and below that point the liquid begins to set.
In the effort range, reality is perceived as activities having to do with survival. Matter appears solid,
but it can be altered with effort.
In the Mystery (unconscious) band reality is perceived as symbols in the upper area where it blends
down from Effort, and as solid objects below that. Matter appears too dense to alter in any way.
PRIMAL GPMS
Love vs hate
Could also be called "affinity vs antipathy." This isn't
a generalized ARC triangle manifestation so much
as personal love versus personal hate, i.e. the
problem being held by the single viewpoint of
"personal self vs other selves". Creates emotional
tone scale. This activates as desire and
accumulates tremendous charge on the identity
terminal due to losses. Buddhist craving. Goal:
"Communicate!"
Effort band (pains, physical sensations, body level thoughts)
Survive vs succumb
This activates as clinging to bodies (ex: Needing
Bodies on the tone scale). Buddhist attachment or
clinging. LRH claimed that "Survive!" was the most
fundamental word of wisdom. (Please note where
this is on the tone scale, below death, and what
GPM was providing the force driving his personal
[terminal] actual GPM goal of "to have wealth.")
Goal: "Survive!" Hubbard's discovered goal
"Survive!" rules the effort range of the tone scale
and therefore is the goal immediately senior to
MEST. Theta interacts with MEST at that level,
producing life forms exhibiting an effort to survive.
Narrative incident running with Dianetics addresses
this area.
Mystery band (matter, unconsciousness)
Persist vs destroy
This is below normal human behavior, but can be
As with everything else I'm working on, this page will change
as more knowledge comes to light.
Ouran
back to index
Ouran:
My studies indicate that there are two "PATHS". They lead through and to one another:
1. The magician's path. If followed long enough it either leads to solipsism (the black
magician), or to enlightenment.
2. The enlightenment path. This is processing and/or meditation. If followed long enough it
brings magickal power -- at which point the student either falls off the path into solipsism, or
passes through to enlightenment.
The problem of solipsism is one of identity, of self. "Self-determinism" is a lie. It doesn't exist
as truth, though it persists really well as a lie! Pan-determinism is the truth, which vanishes
on inspection and has to be recreated constantly in order to be viewed.
A "black magician", "only one", solipsistic self is being SELF-DETERMINED. The problem
with this is that any single point location identity is not the real self. The real self pervades
ALL spaces, and is ALL viewpoints everywhere/everywhen.
John:
I consider there to be three paths, not two. There is the path of service to self, the path of
service to others and the path of surrender. The path of service to self and the path of
service to others have to be handled and discreated first, before there is any point in moving
on to the path of surrender.
Once on the path of surrender, the concept of self and others becomes a complete
nonsense, apart from the primary importance of sustaining ones personal, mind, body and
soul in a truly serviceable condition. If you let go of that, it means that you are still hopping
back and forwards between the path of service to self and the path of service to others, not
able to make up your mind whether to serve others as a victim or as a martyr and crucifying
yourself in the process.
Ouran:
Self versus others is a primal (archetypical) level GPM. It occurs just above good verus evil,
survive vs succumb and all that lot. My observation of people like John Mcmaster and Jesus
is that they made the mistake of occupying ONE TERMINAL.
If a person occupies SELF, and pursues scn/magic as "service to self", then the person
opposes "others" and becomes EVIL TO OTHERS. (the black magician and the money and
power hungry spiritual cult leader are examples of the result.)
If a person occupies OTHER, and pursues scn/magic as "service to others", then the person
opposes "self" and becomes VICTIM TO SELFISHNESS. (jesus' crucifixion and John's
overboarding are examples of the result)
The trick is to dissolve the term/oppterm by getting above it to NO SELF. NO SELF is more
than no "myself", it is also no "other selves" as well. Or it can be viewed as "ALL selves are
myself, and each of them are valid from my viewpoint and from each of their viewpoints
individiually and collectively". Whew! What a bunch of words to say a single idea! ;-)
John:
If you are really on the third path, you still think, talk and act as if the other two paths are real
but actually know that there is no such thing as paths at all from a spiritual point of view. The
truth really is within ourselves. It is completely meaningless for a person who has stepped,
with dedication, onto the third path, to ever go back. Thats what I mean when I describe
ourselves as "third sides" of the triangle. Not only that, I observe that we are both involved in
taking responsibility for the conversion of all available knowledge into a single harmonious
viewpoint.
Ouran:
Yeah! :))))))) And that single harmonious viewpoint includes all viewpoints! So to add to your
model, let me communcate the observation that a person on the service to self path will after
crossing onto the path of surrender, find themselves also serving others! One can then infer
that someone on the service to others path, after making it to the path of surrender, will
serve self (as one of the others to be served!).
But we are talking apples and oranges with our two sets of paths. I was talking
technique/practice, and you were talking intention/affinity it seems. Both are accurate
models, and both are useful frameworks. Thank you very much for telling me yours! :)))))
John:
The way my model is coming together at the moment even makes sense of the Christianity
stuff, to the extent that something comes from the static, discovers how the mental may be
aligned with the spiritual, tries to preach it and gets crucified for his efforts by the GPM shit in
which we live. Like Ron Hubbard, Jesus of Nazareth knew what he was doing but screwed
up because it wasn't complete duplication. The same goes for the Pilot. Only duplication, not
just understanding, will get us forever out of the shit. Knowing how to know is the only way.
Knowing what to know is step one. Knowing how to know is step two. Knowing knowing is
step three. Bingo.
Ouran:
Very well put. :))))
John:
Real Clear (understanding) should be the end of the path of service to self. Its a dangerous
point from which one either descends again as a black magician, into the shit from which
one has only just extracted oneself or commences the more effortful ascent through the shit
of others and eventually onto the path of surrender, as the self denying white magician or
true OT.
You can leave clear out of the picture all together, just making sure that you have flattened
the paths of service to self and others before you move onto the path of surrender. The
guarrantee of this is verification that you have sorted out negative ego. Otherwise it will get
you.
Self determinism is a total con trick. So also is the ridiculous idea that our individual
creations are standalone items. That is the worst crap that Ron promoted, apart possibly
from putting far too much attention on the past (which in fact we spend all our time re
creating in the present).
The reality is that all creation is co creation. Just because The Creator isn't directly visible
isn't any justification for saying there isn't one. Inventing a "GOD" that is anything more than
Aware Will Effortlessly Awake In The Void (like ourselves but a hell of a lot more effective) is
a nonsense. We must always work with the "As above, as below" concept if we are to avoid
the promotion of solipsism. Worship (deep felt appreciation) is probably also a most
invaluable training exercise.
Ouran:
Buddha, in his highest OT drill I've seen, says to use appreciation as one of his four
boundless states. The other three are affinity, empathy and equanimity. These are done as
an actual drill.
partially handled. For instance, running dianetics (#8), then Grade 0 (#7, communications), then
cleaning up the identity terminal in various ways in Grades 1-4 (#6 dichotomy) is a logical sequence.
But then Grade 5 is slipped in! Its 1-3 processes are nice set ups doing more #6 clean up, but then it
addresses #1 and #4, without touching #2 and #3! Then The R6 and Clearing Course materials,
Grades 6 and 7, address the details of SOME (not all) of #5. Dichotomies #2 and #3 are still
untouched by that bridge, though I seem to recall processes that have existed since the 50s which go
after them!
And that is exactly why this data is so important for processors. Let's not do any more skipping
around and missing things. I'm not saying that one absolutely MUST take these in sequence from the
bottom up, though I suspect that's the best course (No need to be too anal in that regard. I remember a
PC named Trevor who came in for processing so screwed up from years of heavy drug use that the
Power processes were run on him first with great results!). But leaving any dichotomy unhandled is a
mistake. And leaving any dichotomy discharged on one end only is a gross auditing error with dire
consequences to the PC. The result can even be a bit bizarre. A perfect example is Hubbard (not to
beat the poor guy to death, but...), who possessed enormous abilities gained from processing, yet
exhibited the dramatizations resulting from the discharge of only one end of #2 and one end of #4
(possible also #1). The effect of this was a demigod who insisted on his spiritual individuality, and
enforced himself as Source of Scn. Observing a person dramatizing one end or the other of a primal
goal pair can now allow a CS in possession of this data to prescribe processes specifically aimed at the
dichotomy!
Wouldn't it be nice to have clears and OTs who didn't dramatize these things?
I would very much like to thoroughly explore the possibility of designing Power style processes
which take on all of these. I especially like the wording of "tell me a source/no source" because it is
arranged to extract one's awareness from a stuck location in the universe and one's terminal in the
universe if run properly. (Frankly the ep given by Hubbard in the bulletins on Power is a mistake;
Filbert indicates the correct ep in "Excalibur Revisited".)
Calling the linear apparency created by these goal pairs a "tone scale" is a bit awkward. It is better
described as the span of all existence. A person's disability or case can be described mechanically as
being aware only in small portions of this span. Using this model, clearing would consist of achieving
awareness and cause over the entire span -- from godhead at the top to the unknowable fragmentation
of self at the bottom. So I'm suggesting, not an entirely new paradigm, but an expansion an old one:
the approach of dianetics. In incident running via dianetic technique, case is brought up the tone scale.
I am suggesting that this is correct as far as it goes, but beyond a certain point in processing a
processee should recover the ability to be at ALL TONES ON THE EXPANDED SCALE. The entire
thing from top to bottom. Naturally I would expect that at some point in processing the scale would
vanish, just as track had vanished earlier in processing when going "clear". The end product would be
a pure simplicity, and the tone scale an amusing complexity which one no longer requires. Okay,
here's the tone scale as its major goals with my (incomplete) notes in regards to processing them.
1. Existence vs non-existence (total existence/total non-existence), nothing vs everything, zero vs
infinity. Goal: "Exist!" as "to have everything" (basic havingness)
Eps: "Tell me a source" - Cognition is "I am source". // "Tell me a no source" Cognition is "The source which I am is not in this universe, and is not this identity I am
being."
Creative processes of all sorts are drills.
5. Meaning (import) vs meaningless, important vs unimportant. Goal: "Import!" ("This means ____!")
Power style, try this: Tell me something important. / Tell me something unimportant.
(This can be tested both with and without the follow-up "Tell me about it.")
This is a HUGE area of mental templates and archetypes (middle thought band of the
tone scale). This is NOT the assignment of meaning to a location in space occupied by
something -- that is symbolizingness. These meanings are timeless/above time. The R6
implants seem to be held in this area. Please understand one thing about implants: they
can have no effect whatsoever upon a spirit which is empty and without mental
structure. But once these goal pairs are in place, they give the implant something to
latch onto. What an implanted dichotomy latches onto is this primal fact about ideas
caused by the #1 goal pair: EVERY IDEA IS A SPLIT INTO A POSITIVE AND A
NEGATIVE EXISTENCE. For example there is no idea "light" or idea "dark"; those
are half ideas. The actual idea is "light/dark". That's how the mind is created, via these
pairs. That's why pairs of opposites must be tapped to resolve mind. That single fact is
behind all goals and GPM phenomena. Once an existence is created as a division into
two like that, then it can be further altered with doingness verbs. Remember: the basic
triangle behind the scale of existence (tone scale) is the BE-DO-HAVE triangle. That is
the hidden engine running the whole show from dichotomy #1.
6. Personal self vs other selves, single location in space vs pervasion. Goal: "Myself!"
Power style:
"tell me where you are located. tell me about it." alternate with "tell me where you are
not located. Tell me about it."
Clean up ser facs, actual GPMs, then find some way to address viewpoint oriented
opinions. Use #5 against #6 with "Who is important? / Who is unimportant?" This has
to unlock the person from mental anchor points, fixed points of view, etc. Ep should be
pervasion, which is beyond a completely free POV, a "thetan" which can assume any
location in space/time at will. Clean up of this goal should free a being from identity
defined by anchor point opinions such as ser facs.
An assist (IMD-swap process):
When resistence is noted between individuals. Place your viewpoint at
those terminals.
There are many other goal pairs than the above ten (I have 9 spotted). These seem to be the basic
ones, atop which the others are built. The processes above are by no means complete. Any highly
trained processor could instantly think of dozens which I missed. Frankly, processing is not my forte.
My real strength is my ability to access truth directly. I am a meditator of the old school in the style of
Gotama or Patanjali.
Zivorad has developed a technique called PEAT which unburdens these and others, read about it here:
http://www.beotel.yu/~zivorad/techniques.htm#peat
A quick read through the history of spiritual enlightenment will show that great spiritual teachers
sometimes deliberately starved themselves or otherwise came close to death just before
enlightenment. I'm not advocating starvation as a clearing procedure, ha ha! But it does point up that
relief of survive/succumb by deliberately taking over (start-change-stop) the succumb end is effective.
Knowing what we do from scn, it shouldn't be too difficult to come up with an entire battery of
processes to as-is the resistance to death.
And that's just survive/succumb.
With ANY dichotomy on which a GPM has formed, the same basic approach can be used. It can be
used with generic dichotomies like survive/succumb or love/hate. It can be used with dichotomies
which have nouns attached (end words and terminals/oppterms). Just find which end the PC is
pursuing and get them to take over and make their own the opposite end, so they can be-do-have
BOTH.
This is ancient tech.
It is also modern LRH style tech.
It just happens to be how people's minds are arranged...
NOTES:
From Homer on ACT:
Alan's process,
"Tell me a positive"
"Tell me about (item)"
that would have to be properly processed thus: "Tell me a positive. Tell me about it. / Tell me a
negative. Tell me about it.
Cause vs effect
Probably an echo of #4 goal.
Communication inflow vs communication outflow
This is wrapped up in the problems of the ARC triangle, such as
duplication vs agreement. A lot of "must" and "can't" involved in
this one. This dichotomy is senior to the "self vs other" identities
dichotomy, but is dramatized heavily in the effort band. This may
just be a special case of cause vs effect.
Male vs female
This one is so charged up on the terminal that a person usually
cannot confront ever being or having been the opposite sex. The
usual Co$ and freezone handle on this is to clean up the overts
and motivators in this area. This should be done narrative style, if
this approach is taken. I recommend R3XD for this purpose. But
there should also be a direct GPM running approach possible,
something similar to the method of relieving actual GPMs. I had
hopes that Ogger would unravel this one, as it is a source of case
for him. Hasn't happened yet. If is curious to note that those
people who have risen above this dichotomy -- such as crossdressers and some homosexuals -- seem to report that it is
liberating and a huge relief. Homosexuals in particular exhibit
higher average income and creativity than the norm. The most
spiritually liberated person I ever met was homosexual: John
McMaster. I have noted that the average American male ridges
heavily on other males, unable to express unrestricted affinity.
There is an obvious automatic games condition between the sexes
which has been described in detail in the literature of psychology
and other places. From all this I infer that relief of this GPM gives a
person vastly increased affinity and creativity. The usual way this
has been dealt with in the past is to not deal with it -- witness the
chastity of nuns, monks and contemplatives over much of this
planet. This one is locked onto the 2nd dynamic (sex).
Help vs harm
The entire idea that a person is so much at effect that they can be
either helped or harmed is ridiculous. Nevertheless here we are.
Valid vs invalid
(The following is one man's account of a spiritual accension, which is so extraordinarily intense that I
have reproduced it here in its entirety. Students who are familiar with my and other freezone theories
about the nature of reality should notice familiar data in this account.)
About three years ago (when I was 20) I was getting quite 'in' to all this
>alternative stuff. I was having regular out of body experiences and
>definitely knew I had started on a path to something. I was questioning my
>life and what I had been led to believe all these years and I realised that
>everything might not be as it seemed.
>
>anyway at that time and age I was quite torn. On one hand I had this new
>'purpose' to uncover the truth about existence and on the other I had
>drinking, clubbing having a fun life.
>
>One day I was laying there on my bed thinking to myself...infact I was
>having a full blown conversation with myself!! As soon as I realised this I
>became a bit angry for some reason.
>
>"I am talking to myself! I am mad!" I thought.
>"Who am I talking to?" I asked
>"Yourself!" came the reply.
>
>I felt depressed and lonely because I realised that I had put alot of hope
>and trust into this 'unseen' side of life, but I couldn't shake the doubt.
>What about if it was all a big delusion of my mind?
>
>I was angry with myself for being so gullible, for believing I had a soul
>that lived forever, for believing I really did have out of body experienced
>and could talk to spirits.
>
>I wanted to stop talking to myself now, go out and enjoy my one single life
>before it was too late.... but for some reason I couldn't stop this
>'conversation' with myself!
>
>"If you can hear me then please just tell me what it's all about!" I shouted
>in my head.
>
>"Pleeeeeeeeasssssssssseeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!" I just wanted something to
>happen, an angel or ghost to appear anything! I just wanted to feel that
>there was a purpose, that I wasn't 'deluding' myself.
>
>Nothing happened.
>
>I got sad but finally admitted. This was it. This is all life is. Better get
>on with it.... I tried to move - but I couldn't!!
>
>I was paralysed, I had somehow slipped into a trance, yet I was totally
>conscious. Unlike when this happens before, this time I couldn't get out of
>it.
>
>"Whats going on?" I asked in my mind again
>"You wanted to know what it's all about" came the thought back...
>
>Bang!
>All of a sudden I woke up.
>Very strange I thought and sat up. What ever happened?
>
>Bang!
>I woke up again!
>Still lying in my bed! Wow, I thought I woke up but I didn't! Weird.
>
>Bang!
>I woke once more. This is getting freaky I thought!
>
>Bang!
>Awake!
>
>Bang..........Bang........Bang.....bang.....Bang..Bang.Bang.BanBanBaBBBBB...
>
>These 'false awakenings' got faster and faster and faster until they were
>producing a constant stream. There was 'No-Time' between these false
>wakings.
>
>at that point something amazing happened.
>
>I realised I was not Dale. I was something, else, something greater.
>It hit me like a ton of bricks. I REMEMBERED who I was. I was pure
>consciousness, I was ALL THAT EXISTED. I was NOTHINGNESS! I was GOD! God
>was me! The loneliness came flooding back to me, I was totally ALONE! I was
>in the most infinitely great pain that you could (not) imagine. In fact
>even Pain was ME! (Note: this was the worst experience ever, pure
>loneliness, pure mind-pain) I desired with all my heart to be away from
>this loneliness...
>
>Then Bang!
>
>I woke up again.... a few moments went past, I could move... yes I had
>really woken up.
>
>The horrible experience was still over-welming me. I could feel tears of
>sadness rolling down my face. Then the next realisation hit me! I now had
>a life! I was still this 'pure consciousness / God' but out of my
>loneliness I had created life out of myself and now (as Dale) I was
>experienceing it - actually living it! Through Me (being God) I had chosen
>life. Positive from negative, light from darkness, everything from
>nothingness. Everything made sense! I was so happy! The tears were now
>tears of joy! I was not alone anymore! I thanked God again and again for
>creating us, knowing that I was as much him (her/it whatever) as he was me!
>
>No wonder he loves us because he is us! No wonder we should love each other
>because we are all parts of the same one consciousness!
>
>Everything was perfect! For the first time it all made sense. I suddenly
>went from not believing in a 'God' to believing 100% and understanding him
>as well. All those kids who think he is a old man with a white beard who
>sits on a cloud !!
>
>I also realised existence was made instantaneously and there is no thing as
>time. We live in that one moment where he chose life. It will last for
>eternity because he never wants to experience the pain again.
--Dale Askew, 23 years old, from Norwich, England
is not
both is and is not
neither is nor is not")
High on the scale a being is "there" very much, equivalent to
being there rather often. This is analogous to "high
frequency". Matter/energy high on the scale also has a high
rate of frequency of appearance and disappearance. The
great power of impact of high frequency energy is apparently
derived from how often it appears and interacts with matter
and other energy. But keep in mind that the reason it has
such a high frequency is because it is backed by beingness,
which is the empty space between "wave crests." This not
only works with radiant electromagnetic energy, but also
applies to "solid" objects. Everything which exists vibrates,
and by vibrating it is appearing and disappearing at some
particular frequency relative to the rate of vibration of
everything else.
There are two ways to increase the power of energy. One is
to increase the frequency, the other is to increase the volume.
With moving energy this can be visualized as beads on a
string. Either the beads are closer together (appear more
often), or the beads are bigger. In general (exceptions caused
by beings abound), the beads (packets, quanta,
reappearances) are larger and farther apart as one goes
downscale.
The bottom of the scale is an apparent 100% "not there" of
beingness. That would make the matter at the bottom of the
scale 100% there all the time, which would be timestop and a
vanishing of the universe from the viewpoint of beings in that
universe. (Beings outside the universe looking "in" would be
under no such handicap.) Some researchers claim that "out
the bottom" takes a person to the top again beyond existence,
but personally I'd rather not attempt that particular route to
This static triangle fits just above the Existence triangle. They
combine to give us the grand tone scale as laid out by
Geoffrey Filbert:
BE
120-100
DO
28
HAVE
0.0
NOT-HAVE
-30
NOT-DO
-80
NOT-BE
-400
With the scale viewed in this manner, BE is pure existence,
DO is the range of creative thought and postulation, HAVE is
viewpoint, opinion and emotion inside apparency, NOT-HAVE
is resistance (not-is) to HAVE (and therefore is effort), NOTDO is counter-thought where the person's postulates have
finally gone to shit, and NOT-BE is the loss of space and
disintegration of beingness.
The whole tone scale once analyzed in this manner gives the
appearance of having been cobbled together in sections over
vast amounts of time, with the sub-Death area looking like it
Lately I've been getting clearer and clearer views of the upper
Thought band at Creation/Truth. The top of it is an infinity of
all possible creations. It's so intense I can't bring it fully into
human consciousness, much less describe it in words. It
Indeed, science itself has become a prime source of the 'unknowable' in its own
right. For example, science today claims that the basis of all personality ( and
therefore, presumably all difficulties ) is to be found in sub-microscopic particles
within the genes of the body - with the strong implication that even with a few
billion dollars worth of research grants, it is very doubtful if we'll ever be able to
truly perceive these things at all. Even if these sub-microscopic particles are
one day perceived and discovered to be harmless after all, a new Hidden
Influence will promptly be dreamed up to take their place. And so the game will
continue.
While the things postulated as Hidden Influences are either imaginary or truly
harmless, the game does little more than make people miserable; but when
these things actually do exist then its an entirely different story. For example,
everyone has been born, but few can recall the event in detail. So there is a
whole class of possible Hidden Influences to be found in the events everyone
knows to have happened, but few can recall ever having happened to
themselves. This class also has the advantage of no one being able to claim it
is imaginary, and so refute the hypothesis out of hand. In other words, the
concept is capable of convincing people of its truth - a prime necessity in the
field of Hidden influences. As this class of possible Hidden Influences is near
infinite, it is very fertile soil for anyone who has, for whatever reason, an urge to
create a convincing Hidden Influence. A number of possibilities in this direction
have already, if inadvertently, been explored. Amongst them are: sex, pain,
guilt, survival, unconsciousness. Others are being continuously added to the list
- as you will find, if you keep up to date with your psychological journals.
Please understand that I am not suggesting that the originators of these
theories were merely out to make a fast buck ( though many fast bucks are
there to be made by the unscrupulous who understand this mechanism ), for
many were dedicated researchers, and truly believed that their research had
found the answer to at least some of mankinds difficulties. No, my whole
purpose is merely to point out that the mechanism is not without its dangers.
Let us take being born for example. Now, to the best of my knowledge no
researcher has ever seriously claimed that being born was the prime cause of
mans' difficulties, though I would not be surprised if sooner or later one of them
did! For it does fulfill all the requirements of a good, convincing Hidden
Influence. Viz:
a) It has happened to everybody.
b) It is not easily recalled.
c) It does contain a certain amount of upset in its own right, quite apart from
what is said about it afterwards.
So you go up to a person and say: "The origin of your difficulties, Mr. Jones, are
to be found in your birth trauma. This, as the very first thing that ever happened
to you, must be the basis for all your later difficulties." He will immediately see
that what you say could just have a germ of truth in it. You then go on to add:
"Once we lift your birth trauma, then the basis of all your psychological
difficulties will be known to you, and all will promptly vanish."
It all sounds very plausible, does it not? But what happens when the person is
convinced that you are right? His birth trauma is now, in his own estimation,
elevated from whatever it originally was, into a thing of vast importance. It will
immediately become much more solid and persistent. It is entirely possible that
any pains he experienced in his birth trauma will immediately impinge upon his
body; and he will also experience the emotions, right then and there, that he
experienced in birth. This, of course, is taken as proof of the fact that the birth
trauma was the basis of his difficulties.
The prophecy becomes, in fact, self-fulfilling!
Now, do you see the danger? Whatever the effect, assuming it to be real and
not entirely imaginary, which is considered as the prime cause of the difficulties,
immediately becomes intensified in importance - and therefore in solidity and
persistence ( man, you just try to get rid of it now! ) - by the mere act of
considering it in such a manner. This is a very real danger, not only to the
patient but to the researcher himself. He himself might not have been totally
convinced by his hypothesis, but here is a person in front of his very eyes who
is proving him right!
So here is the danger:
What ever effect in the mind you choose as being causative over the beings'
behavior, immediately intensifies in solidity, persistence and command power,
and will tend to prove your hypothesis.
But, you might say, what about this therapy you are advocating, surely it ? . . .
No. I never said it. All I'm saying is that that which is considered important tends
to become more solid and persistent, and to have a command power over the
being.
I have never specified the importance.
Re-read the theory if you don't believe me. At no place in it am I pointing the
finger and saying, that is the basic importance. At no time am I postulating a
specific Hidden Influence. Oh yes, there are many things in your mind, which
are currently hidden from you, which influence your behavior. But only you
know what they are. And, what is more, only you are entirely capable of
It seems that all probable realities exist in potential, but some more
actualized than others, perhaps by how widespread the consensus is.
Oh, God, oh hell, oh damn, you would have to bring this stuff up!! *groan* *sigh* Okay, here goes
nuthin'...
I am currently up to my eyebrows in that. I've managed to sort it out to the extent that I fairly certain
of two things:
1. all conceivable realities exist, but most of us are very focused on only a small handful of those
infinite spaces.
2. There are at least two layers of hellish dub-in between a spiritual being which is apparently
"located" in this physical universe, and perception of what is quote "real" endquote.
For any of you who might be familiar with traditional occult terminology, I have recently become
painfully aware of what is sometimes called the "abyss of hallucinations."
The totality of existence seems to be arranged like this:
There is a causal beingness which is all creation. This causal beingness plays a game of being aware
by dividing itself in a number of ways, placing some of its divided parts at "know", but others at
"unknowable". These parts are further divided by arranging for them to not know one another,
separating them and thus creating space(s). All spirits, all thought, all emotion, all efforts, all matter -in an infinite number of universes -- are parts of this causal beingness. Individuals such as ourselves
are separated awarenesses which have self commanded (forget that paranoid implantation crap, that's
lower level stuff which occurs inside a physical universe) to not know, not be, all the other
awarenesses. In addition to that, individuals such as ourselves are also a spacial location inside a
universe, which is used as a point from which to view that universe. So there's two levels to a person:
the individual (which is "outside" the physical universe), and the individual's viewpoint in this space.
There have been anecdotal reports of people waking up in the higher beingness and discovering that
they as an individual are having a multitude of viewpoints in various places. A certain other
researcher who eventually failed was informed of this fact by some of his clients back in 1952 but the
poor redhead didn't follow up on the information, and spent the rest of his career attempting to
accomplish nothing beyond cleaning up people's dirtied locations assumed in the space of this
universe. Which is doomed to fail because the only thing which can clean the mud off the face of the
POV is the individual which is NOT inside the physical universe. Which is why to do zero point, by
the way! :)
The viewpoint in the universe has a number of serious problems which arise simply because it IS a
viewpoint. Reality is created WITHIN the aware beings, i.e. IT IS PERVASIVE in nature. So any
view which is separate from that viewed (object oriented perception) is both distorted and incomplete.
And because the perception of a viewpoint locked into a single physical universe's time track is so
bad, it denies almost as much as it fails to perceive, leading to the blacking out of much of its
awareness in present, past and future. Which leads us to that damned "abyss of hallucinations" again.
Instead of stripping away the blackness and invisibility used to make things unreal, the viewpoint uses
its immense powers of creativity to fantasize a new "reality" atop the blackness. Of course it is only a
reality for one (which is the true state of affairs at the top too, though the "one" at the top is everything
serenely aware of being fragmented.), and no other viewpoint sees what that viewpoint sees. Strictly
speaking, that's crazy.
This becomes really hairy when processing and meditating. As one's awareness increases two things
are happening simultaneously:
1. The viewpoint is waking up as the individual, which is aware of spaces and alternate realities
beyond this single physical universe time track.
2. The layers of blackness and invisibility is coming off unevenly, revealing hidden considerations of
disability and unawareness, which in turn is filtered through the ideas and fixed mental anchor points
which the viewpoint is clutching desperately to keep from spinning. These fixed ideas are used to
generate further hallucination by taking a disability or unawareness and clothing it in some sort of
fantasy narrative framework in order to explain it. Even if the "why" isn't hallucinated and an actual
past incident which occurred in the presence of the viewpoint is found, it is still a partial lie because
there is never any reason for a creation, and that includes the creation of a disability. To use another
groups terms: not only is there no prior reason or justification for an "overt" (a harmful act) which the
person commits, neither is there a prior reason for a motivator (a harmful event which happened "to" a
person). Reasons are all lies because there are no time tracks where the individual really exists. There
is only creation, which has no reasons. So the entire matter of "probable realities" as mentioned above
becomes little more than sorting out what creations are are intended to cover up other creations, which
of them are solo, which are shared, which belong to other individuals and have been *ahem*
"borrowed", and what assignments of sequence and association are assigned to various realities. That
latter is a higher level activity similar to the sorting out process undergone in what another group calls
"NOTs". Much of the advanced NOTs style handling in the group's splinters -- such as upper levels of
Capt Bill, and the Ananda rundowns -- are fully immersed in the mad activity of filtering their
perceptions of their own cases through fixed ideas (as I mentioned above), and these poor bastiches
dub in even worse things than the ghosts of dead space aliens. They get wins but they also get trapped
into fighting "evil" forces in their own minds, not unlike the practitioners of Kabbalah-based magick
with their Qliphoth. (At least they seem to be getting at correct assignments of what creations are
whose...)
This is the situation encountered by magicians when they start out, and is sometimes dubbed the
"lower astral plane." Calling it that, or calling it the Abyss of Hallucinations, doesn't explain it. Those
are just fancy names. The truth is that any beingness, whether a single viewpoint locked into one time
track or an individual separate awareness above time tracks, is a creator. You and I and everyone are
creators. And our activity is solely and only to create realities, apparently the more the better. Which
seems to have become quite a mess, as we have lost track of most of what we are creating.
Conservatism = ridge
... before the onset of efforting (which efforting is resistance and/or enforcement).
Therefore you can take an alternative view of plus emotion as being basic attitude, with negative
emotion being attitude plus effort. Interestingly, when the Co$ revamped dianetics to ask for earlier
somatic rather than earlier similar incident (narrative content), what they did was target effort, because
pains, sensations and misemotions all contain or are "in" the effort band of the tone scale. As the
church 60's definition of clear involves being no longer effect of the force in pictures, then one can see
that sort of clear is clear of unwanted or reactive effort.
Ouran
Affinity
Dispersal
As-
Communication
Alter-
Reality
Not-
Flow
Ridge
Coexistence 160.0
Enthusiasm 4.0
Importances/Values 80.0
Individuality 120.0
Antagonism 2.0
Surrender -80.0
Destruction -100.0
That gives us (in order): the Causal band, Thought band, the
Emotion band, the Effort band, and the Mystery band. But we
haven't reached the bottom of the scale! Good grief! That
indicates that there is ANOTHER level below Mystery! Look:
Evil -120.0
Delusions -160.0
Individuation of Self -320.0
This works, it totally works! But it also means I have to find
the dichotomy which creates that bottom section from -120.0
to -320.0, and insert it into the article "Primal GPMs".
Persist/destroy isn't the bottom dichotomy...
But what is? What could be below solid matter?
My tone scale research is leading me toward some rather
bizarre views of the tone scale:
1. The full tone scale is composed of sections, each
of which operates in a specific "plane" of reality.
2. These planes are mere viewpoints we take.
3. Each plane of the tone scale -- which is a plane
only because we are using a viewpoint creating it
there -- has existence only due to a specific
dichotomy which is the basis of that viewpoint.
4. Each plane or band of the tone scale is a decay
scale showing the cycle of action which occurs as a
result of taking its dichotomy and expanding it into a
triangle using the postulated characteristics of the
number 3.
5. There is really only one cycle -- based on the
number 3 -- which is repeated fractally throughout
all planes, bands and universes with which we have
contact. We are in contact with them simply
updated 7/20/01
Keep in mind that these things seem to blend into one another. For
instance "emotion" seems to begin faintly at around tone 16, which
really ought to be retitled "Aesthetic Feeling". The "personal self"
centered around Games/Opinions seems to begin around tone 40. So
treat many of the tone positions below as only approximations, or better
yet centers of focus, okay?
Native State (neither existence nor non-existence, no singularities nor
dualities whatsoever)
Causal band (BE)
Goal: "Exist!"
Dichotomy: Total existence vs total non-existence
Triangle: unity - duality - diversity? (1-2-3)
Triangle tone scale sections:
#1 - Static 320.0
Goal: "Exist!"
Dichotomy: Existence vs non-existence, Be vs NotBe
#2 - Coexistence/Individuality 160.0 - 120.0
Goal: "Separate!" ("I")
Dichotomy: One self vs individuals (separate
consciousness)
#3 - Awareness 110.0
Goal: "Aware!" or "Perceive!"
The shadow band is a psychotic reflection below the +100 to -100 range
of created reality. It corresponds to the Causal band.
Triangle: ??? - ???? - fragmentation?
Triangle tone scale sections:
#14 - Delusions -110.0
Goal: "Deceive!"
Dichotomy: Illusion (maya) vs apparency
#15 - Evil -160.0
Goal: "Dominate!"
Dichotomy: Domination vs submission
Filbert seems to have had these in the wrong order.
#16 - Individuation of Self -320.0 (soul level?)
Goal: ""?
Dichotomy: Other be vs Not-be?
Please note the cycle of existence in red: the BE triangle and then its
inversion. Wheels within wheels...
Ouran
back to index
Since this universe's goal is to survive, and what survives is a life form,
i.e. a combination of solid MEST and theta operating in the affinity range
(emotion), then survival can be seen as the EFFORT of theta to keep mest
experiencing emotion. See? Three ranges of the scale linked together there:
emotion, effort and MEST.
I'm sure you recall that the area of the tone scale just below Death 0.0 is
the EFFORT range.
So next one has to ask, what persists? MEST does. And if in the Mud universe
theta is operating in the 0.0 to -8 range of the tone scale, then the
"matter" in the Mud universe has to be one step below matter in this
universe. For the purposes of this discussion let's call that stuff "mudd"
(with two D's).
If the same pattern is followed in the Mud universe, then "persistence"
(goal: "to persist") would be the solidification of theta to keep "mudd"
efforting.
Please note that
if the pattern of reality in the Mud universe follows the pattern of higher
universes, then mudd would be immensely more solid than MEST, yet MEST would
interpenetrate mudd easily, the same way higher levels such as effort and
emotion can occupy the same space as MEST in this universe.
happy nightmares. ;-)
Ouran
points of everyone, despite having lost the ability to BE them at will. Please note that
affinity implies distance. Below tone 40 one's space shrinks gradually.
In regards to the tones from -120 down: please note that -120.0 Evil is
the BEGINNING or START of the final cycle of action in the tone
scale. Since the beginning point of any cycle is always the theta
equivalent inside that cycle (see Ghost Danse #7), contemplate what
sort of cycle begins with evil as its most theta existence!
Ouran
back to index
Ouran
back to index
knowledge vs ignorance
confront vs non-confront (as resistance)
#4
create vs destroy
cause vs effect
power vs inability to create and effect
responsibility of creation vs irresponsibility of creation
truth vs lies (as resistance)
#5
meaning/import vs meaningless
quality vs no quality
important vs unimportant (as resistance)
good vs evil (evaluation, another resistance)
justice vs injustice (evaluation, another resistance)
#6
personal self vs other selves
personal self vs everything else
I vs not-I
self vs another
single location in space vs pervasion
personal universe vs material universe
thetan vs the universe
one space vs infinite spaces
small (space) vs large, i.e. being very small vs being very
large, or tiny vs endless
thetan vs the universe
#7
love vs hate
affinity vs antipathy
approaching vs avoiding
near vs far
agreement vs disagreement (as resistance)
#8
survive vs succumb
live vs die
living body vs corpse
#9
persist vs destroy
solidify vs dissipate
condense vs entropy
tidy objects vs nuclear holocaust (as resistance)
#10
too much vs not enough
resisted existence vs resisted nothingness
other be vs not-be
not-me vs not be
make everything of me being you vs make nothing of you
being me
That bottom one is still hard for me to confront. Grant me lots
of beingness if I've screwed it up. When I was first reaching
for it I went and talked to Max Sandor in an attempt to get
help. Naturally his words were just the opposite of what I was
expecting! I was asking about the bottom in terms of horror
and loathing. He replied in terms of richness and appreciation.
I find that quite amusing now.
Ouran
back to index
back to index
Goal:
CREATE
TRUTH
EXISTENCE
Description:
Existence vs non-existence. Also expressible as "total existence vs total non-existence", "be vs not
be", or even "nothing vs infinity." Manifestation out of Native State. This is behind everything... This
one is so deep I can't think of any process which can fully resolve it. This is not only far above human
reality, its problem is almost incomprehensible. The first half, "existence", appears to be an infinity of
any and all qualities one might want to name. The second half, "non-existence", appears to be a zero,
a total stillness which LRH described as a static. BE, which is to say a goal reading something like "to
have existence", is pursued heavily by most people. It's very rare (and disturbing) to see anyone
switch to the opposing goal and pursue NOTHING. So to make anything vanish is experienced as a
"loss" reacting on this goal (which is basic to all losses of all kinds). This of course affects the person
at their PU terminal as well (personal self/thetan located in space), usually as some variant of
Shakespeare's famous scene in Hamlet. ;-) The highest processes of which I know only achieve the
static, but do not resolve this dichotomy into Native State. Gotama (the Buddha) is alleged to have
resolved this one. I have no opinion about whether he succeeded. Max Sandor, in his novel "The Logs
of JD Flora" expressed this awareness: "Nobody can leave who wants to leave. Nobody can leave who
wants to stay." ... "Not wanting to leave, not wanting to stay, I will cease to create my existence."
Goal: "Exist!" "to have everything!"
Alternate names:
existence vs non-existence
total existence vs total non-existence
be vs not be
all that exists vs nothingness
nothing vs everything
zero vs infinity
potential vs actual (real)
emptiness/loss vs havingness (as resistance)
(top dichotomy apparently also contains unity vs duality)
Goal: "Exist!"
Dichotomy: Total existence vs total non-existence
Triangle: unity - duality - diversity? (1-2-3)
Triangle tone scale sections:
Tone: Static 320.0
Goal: "Exist!"
Dichotomy: Existence vs non-existence, Be vs Not-Be
Case characteristics:
#1 goal "exist!"
Resistance at the level of infinite existence is HAVINGNESS.
Losses, emptiness. This is the biggest impediment to clearing because it causes the person to
mock up their case again.
Processes:
1. Existence vs non-existence (total existence/total non-existence), nothing vs everything, zero vs
infinity. Goal: "Exist!" as "to have everything" (basic
havingness)
Power process: What is? / What isn't? (McMaster)
(This would appear to be a potential "one shot clear" process due to its all-encompassing
command. If you could get it to run on all levels.)
A process to try: Tell me a nothing. / Tell me an infinity.
Or as an OT drill: Locate a static. / Locate an infinity. (I deliberately wrote this to be quite
insidious. "Locate" means place inside a space,
which cannot actually be done in either case! The intention here is therefore to lure the PC into
expanding beyond existence.)
CREATION
Description:
Truth vs lies (upper thought band, creation). Here we have the basis of all reality, in the archetypical
area. This dichotomy is the basis of the as-is, alter-is, not-is triangle. It is from this point on the tone
scale that I write all of these Ghost Danse articles. Therefore please be advised that all the views on
the causal area above this point are distorted. Nothing above this point is perfectly expressible in
words by anyone. Goal: "Create!"
Alternate names:
create vs destroy
cause vs effect
power vs inability to create and effect
responsibility of creation vs irresponsibility of creation
truth vs lies (as resistance)
Goal: "Create!"
Dichotomy: Truth vs alterations (lies)
Triangle: as-is - alter-is - not-is
Triangle tone scale sections:
Truth (Creation) 100.0 (as-is)
Goal: "Create!"
Dichotomy: Truth vs lies
(note: differentiation)
Case characteristics:
#4 goal "create!"
Resistance at the level of creation is NOT-ISNESS.
Refusal of responsibility of creation.
Processes:
4. Truth vs lies. Goal: "Create!"
Power process: Tell me a source. Tell me about it. / Tell me a no source. Tell me about it.
(McMaster)
Eps: "Tell me a source" - Cognition is "I am source". // "Tell me a no source" - Cognition is "The
source which I am is not in this universe,
and is not this identity I am being."
I'd advise refreshing the definitions of "as-isness" (Scn) and "create" (normal
CONSCIOUSNESS
Description:
One self vs individuals (separate consciousness). Also perceptible as "no space vs infinite space".
Separation from static into Coexistence. Even though fragmentation into entities occurs near the
bottom of the tone scale, it is this dichotomy and its resulting GPM which are subtly involved in entity
problems such as attachment and obsession by "BTs." The entire subject of self is from this
dichotomy, and all the problems of such derive either directly or indirectly from this. This would seem
to literally create separated spaces. "... the consideration that Theta is individual Thetans" --Raymond
J. Krenik, Jr. Goal: "Separate!"
Alternate names:
one self vs individuals
one vs many
one consciousness vs separate consciousnesses
Coexistence/Individuality 160.0 - 120.0
Goal: "Separate!" ("I")
Dichotomy: One self vs individuals (separate consciousness)
Case characteristics:
#2 goal "separate!"
Resistance at the level of separation is INDIVIDUATION.
The only one. The lonely one.
Processes:
2. One self vs individuals, one vs many (no space vs infinite space). Goal: "Separate!"
This pair gets dramatized as "We are all one" versus "I am alone/unique".
Power style, try this: What is alone/separate. / What is one/united?
"tell me a unity/tell me about it; tell me a separation/tell me about it" to ep on BOTH commands!
Or maybe "tell me what everyone knows/tell
me about it; tell me what everyone doesn't know/tell me about it; tell me what one person
knows/tell me about it; tell me what one person
doesn't know/tell me about it" commands along those lines. That second group uses #3 dichotomy
as a lead-in to the #2.This needs much
more research...
Readers without a scio background should perhaps skip this message. It refers to data which is only
found in Scn, and it is written VERY densely.
The way to erase "invalid creations" is to create them. This relates directly to what the Pilot said that
one does not have to BE in order to DO.
Using the model of the expanded tone scale, the "highest" tones (the BE tones) of +400, +320, +160,
+120 and +110 are all false (reference: http://www.censorthis.com/ouran/GD45.html ). They are all
creations resulting from the placing of static at BE... which it isn't. Static located in any manner is no
longer static.
The actual top of the tone scale, out of which the entire thing is generated, is the tone +100, which
Filbert calls Truth, which I call Creation, and between those two names there is no conflict
whatsoever except perhaps in a reader's mind, not in mine. I have merged the polarity (PP) of
Create/Destroy and can report to you that the *apparent* conflicts between the extremes of that PP -which can be expressed in words as create/destroy, create/uncreate, lies/truth, etc. -- are mere
apparency. Uncreation IS creation. Lies are creations. Truth is a creation. Destruction is a creation. It
is all "create", which is found at +100 on the tone scale.
All of the tones above +100 are creations. All of the tones below +100 are creations. Create is the top
"button", the single attribute and action of life.
Create's PP like I said can be expressed a number of ways, the most common of which seem to be
create/destroy, create/uncreate, and lies/truth.
Create's triangle, which describes its cycle of action (which runs on the CDEI decay scale) is "as-is,
alter-is, (not or un)-is".
So BE is a creation. There is only DO. The only action of DO is Create, which is "decision", also
called "postulation". But decision and postulation are partial illusions caused by viewing the action
(DO) of creation through a viewpoint in space.
BE and HAVE only seem to be realities when a person is polarized. When the polarity (PP) of
existence/non-existence behind the BE/DO/HAVE triangle is merged, its extremes become one again
(be and have still exist, but are no longer problems), and the middle of the triangle of that polarity
(DO) becomes its characteristic once again. All PPs resolve to their DO aspect as the extremes merge
and are neutralized.
The DO of create/destroy is nonstop creation, also known as alter-is. Look around at the physical
universe. It's continuously changing isn't it? Welcome to alter-is, to true creativity.
The physical universe is the opposite pole of creation. Notice that on Filbert's expanded tone scale that
the tone -100 is called Destruction? So there's your first range of reality: from +100 at Create to -100
at Destroy. But since Filbert called +100 Truth (I call it Creation, not Filbert), then in order to be
consistent he perhaps should have named -100 Lies instead of Destruction? Perhaps, but that would be
logical and logic is a creation too. The truth is that tone -100 is both Destroy AND Lies, and because
it is both, it is the foundation of the physical universe. Both poles of create/destroy or truth/lies are
found at the extreme tones of +100 and -100.
MEST (matter/energy/space/time) is at -100 on the tone scale. It is there as Effect. MEST is at +100
on the tone scale as Cause. I realize that made no logical sense, but it is truth, which is senior to logic.
I call the tones below -100, the "Shadows", as they consist of insane reflections of the tones which are
above +100. They are illusions, and "Qliphoth" in Kabbalistic terms. The Hebrew Tree of Life is an
attempt to depict what scios call the tone scale. I have most of it worked out; it's lying around
somewhere on this computer... It'll end up on the site eventually.
Malkuth for instance is tone -100! (These words may not mean much to ex-scios who have never
studied the Kabbalah, but I'll bet Zivorad, who has studied it, is saying "I knew that" and smiling as he
read it!)
So there is no real conflict among these systems, merely differences in the way they are expressed in
words. And the words are not the realities, to paraphrase Alfred Korzybski.
So... how to erase these "invalid creations"? Discover exactly what you are creating. When you do,
create it. Remember your Hubbard back in the days when he wasn't nuts (the early 1950s): if you wish
to STOP something, practice START and CHANGE on it until it is under your control. Additionally,
the PP data generated by both PEAT and my private research indicates that the beginning and end of
any cycle of action/triangle (true triangles are always cycles of action) are the parts which become
polarized. So if you get sight of even a little bit of one of these "invalid creations" then take it up as a
problem and run PEAT on it! Zivorad has given us a marvelous tool to use. Thank you very much
Zivorad! :)))
Use it.
Ouran
AWARENESS
Description:
Perception vs non-perception (this is from Buddhism, but maybe predates Gotama). Also called know
vs not-know. You could also call it aware vs unaware. Creates the Know to Mystery scale. Filbert
claims that LRH was wrong about what all wisdom boiled down to, and that the most fundamental
word of wisdom is "Aware!", which is this level. Damned close, but "Exist!" is senior. That's okay,
Filbert is seeing and operating a hell of a lot higher than LRH! (see "Survive vs succumb" below)
Goal: "Aware!" or "Perceive!"
Alternate names:
perception vs non-perception
know vs not-know
aware vs unaware
consciousness vs unconsciousness
knowledge vs ignorance
confront vs non-confront (as resistance)
Tone:
Awareness 110.0
Goal: "Aware!" or "Perceive!"
Dichotomy: Perception vs non-perception
Case characteristics:
#3 goal "perceive!" (aware! know!)
Resistance at the level of perception is UNKNOWING.
Unknowableness. Non-confront. Mystery.
Processes:
3. Perception vs non-perception, know vs not-know. Goal: "Aware!" or "Perceive!"
Power style, try this: Tell me an awareness. / Tell me an unawareness.
(This can be tested both with and without the follow-up "Tell me about it.")
Also plug in "know": What is known? / What is unknown?
(This can be tested both with and without the follow-up "Tell me about it.")
OT drill:
"Be aware at your location in space."
"Be aware that you are unaware in all other spacial locations than that location. Decide to 'notknow' all of those locations."
"Change your mind and decide to reverse that by not-knowing at your location in space, while
MEANING
Description:
Alteration by attachment of one creation to another. Most people are going to read about this and
consider that they apply to their thoughts. Well they do ALSO apply to their thoughts as a lower scale
mockery of this level. This is not really about those thoughts which occur in your body's head. These
meanings are pervasions which alter decisions which are energies that power/create the span of reality
itself. As body thoughts: Meaning (import) vs meaningless (middle thought band, alteration). Or
perhaps this is quality versus no quality. Also important vs unimportant. Single/combined or
simple/complex on the subject of creations. Here we have the basis of values, in the archetypical area.
The triangle is: perception (of the creation), evaluation (alteration of creation), judgement. This can
also be expressed as good vs bad, beauty vs ugliness, and valuable vs worthless, etc. There's a lot of
thought level charge built upon this into a GPM. As this is above "personal self vs other selves" there
is no way any personal identity is going to solve this dichotomy -- please view what is sometimes
called "christ consciousness" for the solution. The primary mechanism of getting an as-isness to
persist is to "tag" it with meaning. "This means before." "This means after." "This means good." "This
means bad." "This is important." "This means I didn't create it." "This has value." "This means I don't
know it." "This means... This means... This means... " Etc. etc. etc. ... This is a secondary creation atop
a first one, an alter-is, which obtains persistence for a creation, for an as-isness. Buddha is seen
admonishing his monks against this action in the Mulapariyaya Sutta. Goal: (I'm Having difficulty
expressing this one perfectly, so as close as I can get it right now is) "Import!" or "to Judge!" ("This
means ____!") "Attach!"?
Alternate names:
meaning/import vs meaningless
quality vs no quality
important vs unimportant (as resistance)
good vs evil (evaluation, another resistance)
justice vs injustice (evaluation, another resistance)
TONE: Importances/Values/Meaning 80.0 (alter-is, attachments to the as-isness)
Goal: "Attach!" ("Import!" or "This means ____!")
Dichotomy: Meaning vs meaningless (importance, an alteration, an association attached)
Triangle: perception (know) - attachment - judgement (evaluation)
(note: association)
Case characteristics:#5 goal "import!" (meaning!)
Resistance at the level of meaning and significance is IMPORTANCE.
The more important something is, the more it is enforced and its alternative resisted.
Processes:
5. Meaning (import) vs meaningless, important vs unimportant. Goal: "Import!" ("This means ____!")
Power style, try this: Tell me something important. / Tell me something unimportant.
(This can be tested both with and without the follow-up "Tell me about it.")
This is a HUGE area of mental templates and archetypes (middle thought band of the tone scale).
This is NOT the assignment of meaning to
a location in space occupied by something -- that is symbolizingness. These meanings are
timeless/above time. The R6 implants seem to be
held in this area. Please understand one thing about implants: they can have no effect whatsoever
upon a spirit which is empty and without
mental structure. But once these goal pairs are in place, they give the implant something to latch
onto. What an implanted dichotomy latches
onto is this primal fact about ideas caused by the #1 goal pair: EVERY IDEA IS A SPLIT INTO
A POSITIVE AND A NEGATIVE
EXISTENCE. For example there is no idea "light" or idea "dark"; those are half ideas. The actual
idea is "light/dark". That's how the mind
is created, via these pairs. That's why pairs of opposites must be tapped to resolve mind. That
single fact is behind all goals and GPM
phenomena. Once an existence is created as a division into two like that, then it can be further
altered with doingness verbs. Remember: the
basic triangle behind the scale of existence (tone scale) is the BE-DO-HAVE triangle. That is the
hidden engine running the whole show
from dichotomy #1.
VIEWPOINT
Description:
Personal self vs other selves (lower thought band, separate viewpoint/location in space). Perhaps this
should be better described as "personal self versus everything else". This is the dichotomy directly
senior to "actual" GPMs. It is activated by having only a single viewpoint, i.e. an identity such as an
actual GPM terminal. The actual GPM terminal is most likely created by whatever laid in this GPM
dichotomy. There have been reports for almost 30 years of processees reliving incidents where they
started the incident as a big being who is a whole crowd of people, and end the incident only being
one of that crowd. Please note that though this superficially resembles separation from static, it is not
the same thing. Beingness above this dichotomy is pervasive, below it there is only a single near point
location in space from which reality is viewed. (The Thought band is a complete cycle of action and
decays scale for thought. The third, lower portion of the thought band consists of the dead mass of
postulation. Is this it? An identity at Opinions is a postulate mass? Perhaps not. The result of
postulation would be solidified creation. But what would be its goal????? The answer would lie in
what occurs at tone 50...) Goal: "Myself located!" (to be there!)
Flemming Funch discusses this dichotomy in Technical Essay #42 "Beingnesses":
When you assume a viewpoint it implies that there are points you are not viewing from.
Those are called dimension points.
The separation of viewpoints and dimension points creates space and it allows an
interchange to occur. The viewpoints can have considerations about the dimension points
and the dimension points provide something for the viewpoint to experience.
It usually gets more involved than that. Various viewpoints and dimension points get
grouped together and the being decides to be all of it and pretend that it is one thing. That
is
what we could call an identity. One is being that and not being everything else. The "not
being" part is the outside world that the identity is dealing with.
Alternate names:
personal self vs other selves
personal self vs everything else
I vs not-I
self vs another
single location in space vs pervasion
personal universe vs material universe
thetan vs the universe
one space vs infinite spaces
small (space) vs large, i.e. being very small vs being very large, or tiny vs endless
thetan vs the universe
Tone range: Viewpoints 40.0 - 16.0 (not-is, not being in some locations, unattached i.e. disassociated
there, while identified [theta located] in another or others.)
Goal: "Myself!" (located)
Dichotomy: Personal self vs other selves (separate viewpoint/location in space)
(note: identification in one or more locations, disassociation elsewhere)
Case characteristics:
#6 goal "myself!" (locate!)
Resistance at the level of self is IDENTITY (terminals).
Who are you being (valence), and whose opinions & viewpoints you have acquired without
fully viewing them.
Processes:
6. Personal self vs other selves, single location in space vs pervasion. Goal: "Myself!"
Power style:
"tell me where you are located. tell me about it." alternate with "tell me where you are not located.
Tell me about it."
Clean up ser facs, actual GPMs, then find some way to address viewpoint oriented opinions. Use
#5 against #6 with "Who is important? /
Who is unimportant?" This has to unlock the person from mental anchor points, fixed points of
view, etc. Ep should be pervasion, which is
beyond a completely free POV, a "thetan" which can assume any location in space/time at will.
Clean up of this goal should free a being
from identity defined by anchor point opinions such as ser facs.
An assist (IMD-swap process):
When resistance is noted between individuals. Place your viewpoint at those terminals.
Between two people:
Be Person A.
From that terminal look at Person B. Tell me about them.
Be Person B.
From that terminal look at Person A. Tell me about them.
Repeat until the charge blows.
IMD-swap uses the senior position of primal pair #2 to relieve resistance between terminals at the
level of #6.
The ultimate supressive act may be to think oneself and others as _terminals.
The next most supressive act may be to process a person from his view point and the viewpoints of
other _terminals.
You see, in this fashion life is compressed into dots (regardless the size)... one is individuated into
boundaries described by the viewpoints... and in most cases, lets face it, those dots are mighty small.
Even when one claims to have his little dot expanded to all the universes as some do, please notice the
results to date. almost uniform insanity, crimninality etc. We have some good examples lately. The
Slatkin mess, and the cult and sadly, its founder in many aspects.
This notion that a being is a _terminal... sticks one there.
Phil Scott 6/29/01
AFFINITIES
Description:
Love vs hate. Could also be called "affinity vs antipathy." This isn't a generalized ARC triangle
manifestation so much as personal love versus personal hate, i.e. the problem being held by the single
viewpoint of "personal self vs other selves". Creates emotional tone scale. This activates as desire and
accumulates tremendous charge on the identity terminal due to losses. Buddhist craving. Goal:
"Love!" When reversed becomes a goal of "Freedom!"
Alternate names:
love vs hate
freedom vs love
affinity vs antipathy
approaching vs avoiding
near vs far
agreement vs disagreement (as resistance)
Goal: "Desire/Want!" (affinity)
Dichotomy: Love vs hate
Triangle: affinity - communication - reality
Triangle tone scale sections:
Aesthetic feeling 16.0
Exhilaration 8.0
Goal: "Curious"?
Enthusiasm 4.0
Goal: "Desire"?
Antagonism 2.0 (reality [resistance] begins faintly at 2.0, and through Apathy)
Goal: "Enforce"? (tones 2.0 through 1.1
Goal: "Inhibit"? (tones 1.0 through 0.1)
Goal: "No"? (tone 0.0)
Case characteristics:
#7 goal "affinity!"
Resistance at the level of communication is DISAGREEMENT (on the CDEI scale).
Agreed-upon reality is enforced.
Processes:
7. Love vs hate, affinity vs antipathy. Goal: "Communicate!" (This is affinity/desire via
communication)
Pervade with affinity? Buddha's OT drill goes here. Grade 0 processes. Many, many Scn processes
address this area, but none of them I
recall directly go after the dichotomy in the Power manner. Also "From what distance could..."
etc. EP should be a christlike affinity.
EFFORTS
Description:
Survive vs succumb. This activates as clinging to bodies (ex: Needing Bodies on the tone scale).
Buddhist attachment or clinging. LRH claimed that "Survive!" was the most fundamental word of
wisdom. (Please note where this is on the tone scale, below death, and what GPM was providing the
force driving his personal [terminal] actual GPM goal of "to have wealth.") Goal: "Survive!"
Hubbard's discovered goal "Survive!" rules the effort range of the tone scale and therefore is the goal
immediately senior to MEST. Theta interacts with MEST at that level, producing life forms exhibiting
an effort to survive. Narrative incident running with Dianetics addresses this area.
Alternate names:
survive vs succumb
live vs die
living body vs corpse
Goal: "Survive!"
Dichotomy: Survive vs succumb
Triangle: responsible - control - know (by effort)
Triangle tone scale sections:
Death -0.0
Protecting Bodies -2.2
Being Objects -10.0
Case characteristics:
#8 goal "survive!"
Resistance at the level of survival is FORCE (counter-effort).
This is classic counter-efforts.
Processes:
8. Survive vs succumb. Goal: "Survive!"
Resistance keywords on this one: need, must, can't, etc. Resistance begins at Antagonism 2.0 on
the tone scale. Therefore Dianetics which
follows "somatics" (R3R) cleans this up. The definition of clear as no longer subject to the force in
pictures is a clear on this level. Much of
the excellent work of Hubbard addressed this.
that is when one takes only half of something out, one pole,
and leaves the other pole intact. This is the real phenomenon
occurring when running a scn process which is working a
dichotomy, and leaving it unfinished. If the processor quits
after one half of the dichotomy has been taken to extremely
good indicators and much release, without taking its opposite
out, then the person feels very very good for a while... and
some time later crashes and burns because the opposite pole
is still there. This is especially important with the Power
processes of scn. If for instance one runs Power process #4
(Source) and gets the end phenomenon and huge release
from "Tell me a source", then the negative pole is still there
and in full restimulation! This is a sure-fire recipe for
ascension/crash, because "no source" is the other half of the
truth, is still fully in existence, and because it is no longer
balanced by "source", will COME FULLY INTO
MANIFESTATION! The person will become a no source and
crash downscale and burn! The missing data in scn is the
polarity tech being researched in the late 90s and 00s. The
basic rules are these:
One can detach bits of case from each other safely without
having to work both sides of any polarities involved. (It's best
to do so, but not necessary.) This is not true however with
taking case out of the universe completely. When totally
uncreating an item of case, both sides of any polarity involved
must be taken out of existence, or the untouched pole will not
merely persist, but actually increase its manifestation. If it's
the positive pole the person will exhibit positive gain as a
persistance, which is an untruth that will lead to obsessive
and excessive positive behavior leading to a new. massive
service facsimile. If it's the negative pole, look out! One is in
for a tough time of negative behavior and unhappiness.
Ouran
back to index
being you divided from" for split pieces of yourself, and the
older NOTs command "Who are you?" for misowned pieces of
others.
The second part looks odd as hell from low on the scale...
2. Expanding to encompass that other beingness, and all
other beingnesses, after doing #1. At 320 on the tone scale
there is only one beingness, one thetan. But that single thetan
is aware of having itself divided into separate viewpoints,
each of which denies being all the others. Get high enough on
the scale and there is no more misownership possible -because you ARE all beingnesses everywhere and
everywhen. This is an important cog and produces a keyout
of magnitude. Buddha gave explicit instructions on getting to
this area by means of the most flabbergasting OT drill. Even a
glimpse of it shatters an "only one" condition, allowing a return
to intimate ARC.
This explains why NOTs has been necessary after clear. This
also explains why R3XD works on anyone: because it
addresses those two top bands of the tone scale in addition to
the bands below.
I am SO relieved to have finally seen what's going on in this
area.
Ouran
back to index
THE DYNAMICS
The "dynamics" as they are known in Scn and the freezone -whether the four human dynamics of Dianetics, the eight of
Scn, or the 16 backed by the 64 goals discovered in an
implant by Ken Ogger -- are nothing more than an arbitrary
construct. I realize that might sound like a radical statement to
some people, but it's true. The dynamics are arbitrary, and
they were apparently deliberately built. Obediance to these
dynamics is part of the anatomy of a being's disability. Okay
that was the second radical statement. It means that the
dynamics act as an aberration. These statements might
sound radical to some people for the simple reason that the
Co$ teaches the dynamics as positive guides. That's a partial
truth and a partial lie. Like any great lie, it is a mixture of truth
and lies. Please don't get the idea from that second statement
that the life indicated through dynamics should be ignored, or
that a person should go on a rampage of destruction against
survival on any or all dynamics. Hardly. Going ape and
swinging on a vine over to assuming the oppgoal is never the
way to go. The positive, creative actions involved in survival
are good. But their very definitions are the problem. Having
your mate be a 2nd dynamic instead of a first for example is
almost inviting the husband or wife to become an oppterm
instead of a part of "me." More on this later... Instead what
needs to be done is to dig oneself out from under the fixed
points of view laid in by these dynamics. For they are an
"implant", whether by willing agreement or forced reality. An
important thing to remember about them is that they have the
effect of canalizing a being's point of view into narrow
channels; and also they have the effect of reinforcing GPMs,
which are tagged to and channeled through, specific
dynamics.
Now, during one of these sessions, to tell the truth, you know
the
goal to tell the truth, and running the Service Facsimile, you have
got
to be able to communicate to be right, sort of thing, I looked at the
situation between my father and me. And I was able to take
almost
complete responsibility because I understood, apparently, so much
more
than he did, but I did not know whilst I was living in the same
environment, that I understood so much more than he did. I just
assumed
he understood and so I had been irresponsible in assuming that he
knew
more than I did because he was an older man. Fact of the matter
is he
didn't.
And as I took responsibility for those things which happened
between us and I blew all my own aberrations on it and the charge
on it,
a wonderful thing happened. It was in one session when I realized
what
I had done to bring about the situation between my father and
myself.
And all of a sudden, out of the blue, as long as it take to get a letter
from Durbin, South Africa to Saint Hill, Sussex, England, there was
an
airmail letter for me, from my father saying, "Dear John, I am so
glad
that you have found such a worthwhile thing to do in such a
troubled
world".
And I just thought, my word, how wonderful, that there is this
telepathic communication, because I hadn't written and told them
anything.
You could run it the other way: What is source. and What is not
source. It is preferable to use "Tell me." You can word clear these
out of a dictionary that "source" is an origin point on something.
The pc will rather quickly come up with himself as source and be
grinning ear to ear over that, and have little to no understanding of
not source. This is the point that L. Ron Hubbard stopped. This is
the point that most church people stop on this particular process.
Although, there is a floating needle, although there is a grin on the
person's face, they still have no understanding of not source, so it
is an unflat process. Of course, they have had an exactlybackwards end phenomena. You keep running the process until
they get this thing straightened out, and realise that they are not
source and that there are a lot of not sources out there. They start
to understand the first and second axioms that they are a life static
and they will cognite that they have been identified with particular
viewpoints or a singular viewpoint in the physical universe, and
had actually thought they were sources, and that is a very silly and
absolutely ridiculous thing to do; to identify and be a point within a
matter, energy, space, time continuum, much less this one. At that
point the process is flat.
He sits, permeating the body with a pure, bright awareness. Just as if a man
were sitting covered from head to foot with a white cloth so that there would be
no part of his body to which the white cloth did not extend; even so, the monk
sits, permeating the body with a pure, bright awareness. There is nothing of his
entire body unpervaded by pure, bright awareness." --Samaaphala Sutta
(accesstoinsight.org)
thought & evaluation, you should develop it with no directed thought & a
modicum of evaluation, you should develop it with no directed thought & no
evaluation, you should develop it accompanied by rapture...not accompanied by
rapture...endowed with a sense of enjoyment; you should develop it endowed
with equanimity.
"When this concentration is thus developed, thus well-developed by you, you
should train yourself: 'I will remain focused on feelings in & of themselves...the
mind in & of itself...mental qualities in & of themselves -- ardent, alert, & mindful
-- putting aside greed & distress with reference to the world.' That's how you
should train yourself. When you have developed this concentration in this way,
you should develop this concentration with directed thought & evaluation, you
should develop it with no directed thought & a modicum of evaluation, you
should develop it with no directed thought & no evaluation, you should develop
it accompanied by rapture...not accompanied by rapture ... endowed with a
sense of enjoyment; you should develop it endowed with equanimity." -Sankhitta Sutta (accesstoinsight.org)
(Buddha's technique of mindfulness updated for modern living is found here:
THE VIKING WAY TO INFINITY.)
keep sitting until I had subdued that fear & terror. When fear & terror came
while I was lying down, I would not sit up or stand or walk. I would keep lying
down until I had subdued that fear & terror. --Bhaya-bherava Sutta
(accesstoinsight.org)
(Note on the technique from Max Sandor: it's freezing time by holding the exact posture
when the feeling comes up... yes, that's a nice technique.. it's advanced in a sense that most
people have so many fears that they can't isolate the actual feeling. But, if you start out with
a rather empty mind and catch the feeling as it sets in, it works nicely just to hold time by not
changing the current body posture, wherever it may be... also a Daoist approach, btw.)
In that same sutta Buddha talks about taking a broad, panexistent viewpoint and
Viewing the Results of Others' Kamma
"When the mind was thus concentrated, purified, bright, unblemished, rid of
defilement, pliant, malleable, steady, & attained to imperturbability, I directed it
to the knowledge of the passing away & reappearance of beings. I saw -- by
means of the divine eye, purified & surpassing the human -- beings passing
away & re-appearing, and I discerned how they are inferior & superior, beautiful
& ugly, fortunate & unfortunate in accordance with their kamma: 'These beings -who were endowed with bad conduct of body, speech & mind, who reviled
noble ones, held wrong views and undertook actions under the influence of
wrong views -- with the break-up of the body, after death, have re-appeared in
the plane of deprivation, the bad destination, the lower realms, in hell. But these
beings -- who were endowed with good conduct of body, speech, & mind, who
did not revile noble ones, who held right views and undertook actions under the
influence of right views -- with the break-up of the body, after death, have reappeared in the good destinations, in the heavenly world.' Thus -- by means of
the divine eye, purified & surpassing the human -- I saw beings passing away &
re-appearing, and I discerned how they are inferior & superior, beautiful & ugly,
fortunate & unfortunate in accordance with their kamma." --Bhaya-bherava
Sutta (accesstoinsight.org)
Sense Observation
"And how does a monk guard the doors of his senses? On seeing a form with
the eye, he does not grasp at any theme or details by which -- if he were to
dwell without restraint over the faculty of the eye -- evil, unskillful qualities such
as greed or distress might assail him. On hearing a sound with the ear...On
smelling an odor with the nose...One tasting a flavor with the tongue...On
touching a tactile sensation with the body...On cognizing an idea with the
intellect, he does not grasp at any theme or details by which -- if he were to
dwell without restraint over the faculty of the intellect -- evil, unskillful qualities
such as greed or distress might assail him. Endowed with this noble restraint
over the sense faculties, he is inwardly sensitive to the pleasure of being
blameless. This is how a monk guards the doors of his senses." -Samaaphala Sutta (accesstoinsight.org)
Eight Liberations
These seem to be a summary of processes and the states
attained thereby:
"Now there are eight liberations, Ananda. What are those eight?
"Oneself having form, one perceives forms; this is the first liberation.
"Being unaware of one's own form, one perceives forms external to oneself; this
is the second liberation.
"Experiencing loveliness, one is intent upon it; this is the third liberation.
"By utterly transcending the perceptions of matter, by the disappearance of the
perceptions of sense-reaction, and by giving no attention to diversityperceptions, one becomes aware of, attains to, and abides in the sphere of
infinite space; this is the fourth liberation.
"By utterly transcending the sphere of infinite space, one becomes aware of,
attains to, and abides in the sphere of infinite consciousness; this is the fifth
liberation.
"By utterly transcending the sphere of infinite consciousness, one becomes
aware of, attains to, and abides in the sphere of nothingness; this is the sixth
liberation.
"By utterly transcending the sphere of nothingness, one attains to and abides in
the sphere of neither-perception-nor-non-perception; this is the seventh
liberation.
"By utterly transcending the sphere of neither-perception-nor-non-perception,
one attains to and abides in the cessation of perception and sensation; this is
the eighth liberation. --Maha-Parinibbana Sutta (accesstoinsight.org)
Or as if a man were to draw a sword from its scabbard. The thought would
occur to him: 'This is the sword, this is the scabbard. The sword is one thing,
the scabbard another, but the sword has been drawn out from the scabbard.' Or
as if a man were to pull a snake out from its slough. The thought would occur to
him: 'This is the snake, this is the slough. The snake is one thing, the slough
another, but the snake has been pulled out from the slough.' In the same way -with his mind thus concentrated, purified, and bright, unblemished, free from
defects, pliant, malleable, steady, and attained to imperturbability, the monk
directs and inclines it to creating a mind-made body. From this body he creates
another body, endowed with form, made of the mind, complete in all its parts,
not inferior in its faculties." --Kevatta Sutta (accesstoinsight.org)
Dependent Co-arising
This appears to be the recognition of a chain of cause and
effect.
"Thus, Ananda, from name-and-form as a requisite condition comes
consciousness. From consciousness as a requisite condition comes name-andform. From name-and-form as a requisite condition comes contact. From
contact as a requisite condition comes feeling. From feeling as a requisite
condition comes craving. From craving as a requisite condition comes clinging.
From clinging as a requisite condition comes becoming. From becoming as a
requisite condition comes birth. From birth as a requisite condition, aging,
death, sorrow, lamentation, pain, distress, and despair come into play. Such is
the origination of this entire mass of stress." --Maha-Nidana Sutta
(accesstoinsight.org)
possessed of form,' 'I shall be formless,' 'I shall be percipient (conscious),' 'I
shall be non-percipient,' and 'I shall be neither percipient nor non-percipient' -do not occur to him." --Samanupassana Sutta (accesstoinsight.org)
from my home village to that village over there. There I stood in such a way, sat
in such a way, talked in such a way, and remained silent in such a way. From
that village I went to that village over there, and there I stood in such a way, sat
in such a way, talked in such a way, and remained silent in such a way. From
that village I came back home.' In the same way -- with his mind thus
concentrated, purified, and bright, unblemished, free from defects, pliant,
malleable, steady, and attained to imperturbability -- the monk directs and
inclines it to knowledge of the recollection of past lives. He recollects his
manifold past lives...in their modes and details." --Samaaphala Sutta
(accesstoinsight.org)
Ouran
back to index
CAVEAT PREEMPTOR
Okay, the title is a joke. This is my warnings page: what to
process and not to process.
Do not implicitly trust anything said by LRH after 1964 or so.
Something went very wrong in 1965. I consider tech before
1965 or so to be trustworthy. From 1965 on, check everything
over carefully against basic principles first before using it. Be
especially wary of the evaluative nature of OT3. Power
processing was from John McMaster, so it's fine. Just make
sure you deliver the main process in the manner
recommended by Geoffrey Filbert. NOTs was apparently
mostly the work of David Mayo, based on the early work of
LRH. It is presented in a too confrontational "self vs BT"
manner, but other than that it is fine. Ralph Hilton has a great
writeup on the processes here, recommended over Co$
material.
Freezone tech which has been advanced beyond Scn is of
great use. This material can be found online through the
various independent groups, such as the German Ron's Orgs,
the Austrian group, the Russian site, and the American site.
Mahayana Buddhism of the Chinese flavor is mostly too
altered, too worshipful, too theetie weetie visionary -- except
for Chan, which is known in the west as Zen. Zen
(China/Korea/Japan) has it's uses. So do Tibetan style
processes/tantras. The most useful Buddhism is found in the
Pali language texts (suttas). Ignore the suttas which are not
reputed eyewitness accounts of what Gotama said. Especially
ignore the commentaries, which can go off into lala land
almost as bad as the mahayanists.
Ouran
back to index
--Joseph J. Harrington
ENTITY THEORY
"unclean spirits."
A key element of this problem with entities is a person's
possession of a single viewpoint occupying so little space in
the physical universe that it is tantamount to being a
dimensionless point of view. People are not being a
dimensionless dot; most people occupy about an inch or two
in diameter. But in practical terms one's space in the physical
universe has shrunk to where it might as well be a point
location in relation to everything else. This shrunken condition
seems to begin gradually from around tone 40, becomes
institutionalized as an operating basis at Games, and
squeezed down to the small space we are accustomed to
seeing at or near Exhilaration. This is the range, tone 40 to
tone 8, of the "lower astral plane". The reason it appears to be
a madhouse of dead thetans, stuck circuits and other junk is
because the real nature of a Being is pervasive. It occupies
the space of everything it decides to be in contact with. Which
makes living in the physical universe a real mess if one is an
inch in diameter, and in contact with a thousand miles in
diameter. That means that 99.9999999ish% of the reality one
is occupying has been abandoned! It's no wonder everything
beyond that one inch of space seems filled with bogeymen!
The person has withdrawn all responsibility from most of their
own space! And that abandoned space is still filled with their
own thoughts, emotions, images and efforts. Plus, it's also
filled with the thoughts, emotions, images and efforts of
others. By "others" I mean more than just other "people" -these are thoughts, emotions, images and efforts FROM ALL
DYNAMICS. From everywhere and everything. These
thoughts, emotions and efforts put one into direct spiritual
contact with the being(s) and circumstances wherein they
originated. This puts you in contact with yourself in past track
and other spaces(universes). This puts you in contact with
other thetans or various sorts of entities. It puts you in contact
with apparent group minds which are associated with various
this anatomy:
Theta (beingness)
Upper thought band creation (as-isness)
Middle thought band idea (alter-isness)
Lower thought band opinion which is a limited concept
A touch of emotion, usually as a attitude reinforcing the
opinion
A "body" which is a featureless dot of effort level energy.
As I have pointed out before: since a thought can be moved
around, and the above idea and concept are "meaning", and
the effort energy is "mass", then a thought fits LRH's definition
of a symbol: mass, meaning and mobility. As a magician, if
you want that thought to also manifest itself as Will (intention)
then you had better acknowledge its existence as a
beingness. And magicians do. The thought's "body" can also
be beefed up, making it anywhere from a symbol which has a
shape (common in western magick), to creating a functioning
body. This latter is called a "Thing."
Locating these on the tone scale:
A normal thought exists from the top of the tone scale down to
around -3.0, which is Thinkingness on the Know to Mystery
scale.
A symbolized thought entity (one which has a definite
meaningful shape) exists from the top of the tone scale down
to around -4.0, which is Symbolizingness on the Know to
Mystery scale.
A magician's Thing, Homunculus, or Body of Light (with an
animal or human body shape) exists from the top of the tone
scale down to around the range of -6.0 to -10.0, which is
Sexingness, Mystery and Wait on the Know to Mystery scale.
This is also the range of the Etheric body or coarse aura
I did an odd sort of session to help a friend. My friend is in a "go away - come closer", push-pull game
with her boyfriend. One of the ways this manifests is that if she thinks he might be communicating in
any way with another woman, she flips out with jealosy and does her best to crawl into his pocket (so
to speak).
They had just spent a few days together and were driving their separate ways home. But they
reencountered each other right before the freeway onramp. As she came up along him, she noticed he
was talking on his cellphone. She gasped just as he noticed her. He responded to her horrifed
expression with a series of ugly expressions of his own -- then the light changed and they parted
again. Need I point out that the two have plenty of earlier similars with each other along these lines?
She immediately called him from her cellphone.
He didn't answer. His withdraw was already underway.
For the next three days she called his phone numbers, I assume Caller ID let him know who it was,
and he did not pick up. Finally she called me, a little frantic.
First I explained the nature of the game she and her boyfriend were playing, and then tried to pull her
out of being interiorized into the game by giving her techniques for playing. (Basically, when
someone withdraws from you, withdraw HARDER yourself and that will usually undo the other
person's withdrawal. The game of reach and withdraw played here is in the effort range and so is very
automatic and reactive.)
What I did next was new, for me helping another anyway. I have done this for myself before, hell it's
almost a required technique if you are going to operate as a being, but I'd never tried it with another
person.
I explained to her that we were going to go back in time in our minds, and relive each and every time
in the sequence wherein she had reached by attempting to call. And that we would do it (like in a
dianetic chain) starting from the most recent attempted call, then working our way back one at a time.
I was treating the reencounter at the stoplight right before the freeway as "basic". And I was treating
all of her attempted phone calls as locks atop that basic. I explained to her that we were going to spot
the moment in each when she had decided to call him, then while still back in time, she was to, lightly
and without effort, change her mind and decide to not call him after all. We did this and had just
reached "basic" when her phone did the pulse of soundlessness which indicated that she had another
call waiting. She clicked over to it, then clicked back and told me "It's HIM, I'll talk to you later!"
Yup, it worked like magic! In fact, it WAS magic. Was it auditing? Beats me, twould depend on how
you define auditing I suppose. Of the comm lines supposed to be present in a session, we had the
"auditor to PC" whatsit line and the "PC to auditor" itsa line. Was accessing her decisions a "PC to
bank" line? But I wasn't erasing what one would normally think of as "bank", unless one subscribes to
the idea of "bank" on higher dynamics. I suppose so because I was getting her to look at her decisions,
which are a type of postulate. Make no mistake: my whole intent was to make a change in HER
BOYFRIEND by removing her reaches toward him, thus allowing him to reach himself. Given the
automaticity of their mutual game condition, I had no worries about him being sufficiently Cause to
change his own mind and not call her. My only real doubt before I began was "could she erase enough
of her decisions to make the necessary withdrawal of her own?", then I looked at the doubt and
vanished it and proceeded to walk her through the incidents.
What I didn't tell her is that I was partially in her mind during the session. I was right there as-ising
those decisions too.
These sort of effects on other people have been known to happen as a side effect of processing. In this
case however, it was no side effect, the effect on the boyfriend was the desired ep. And I got it...
Instantly, ha ha!
Ouran
Gotama (the Buddha) over 2500 years ago warned his monks
against making symbols out of objects, against assigning
meaning constantly to the things around them
("fermentations" I believe he called it). This is in the
Sabbasava Sutta. Alfred Korzybski (the founder of General
Semantics) likewise perceived that the meaning tagged to an
object was not the truth when he pronounced his famous
dictum: "The map is not the territory." (Quoting him in this
context is viewing his words from the opposite end from which
they are usually seen.)
What probably neither of them explained is that MEANING IS
ALTERATION. To say that in purely scio terms: MEANING IS
ALTER-IS. It is an alter-is of an original as-iness occasionally - or much more often, an alter-is of a current isness.
When dealing with physical objects (which are never so far as
I know original as-isnesses), this alteration is atop quite a bit
of previous alteration, involving such things as time and
ownership/source. Because it is atop prior alteration, then the
assignation of meaning to a physical object is effectively a
NOT-IS.
And THAT has to be precisely why Buddha stressed the
cessation of thinking up all sorts of ideas about the world
around us. So long as any monk were assigning meaning to
something, he would be incapable of achieving its ISNESS,
because all his thinking would be not-ising the thing.
So it can be seen that in order to rise out of lower tones and
conditions, it is necessary to cease one's automatic
assignment of meaning to objects. I said automatic! Not shut
it off permanently, just get it under control: start, change, stop.
Upon attaining this, I would expect a person to most likely
release from the Effort band of the tone scale. And
THE PLANES
back to index
called imagination.
The real problem with supposedly "objective" reality is that it
also is mocked up. Most people on this planet are spiritually
blind. They do not possess direct perception of the physical
universe even close to being on par with their body's senses,
much less superior to those weak, limited senses. So what a
person does is take the input from the body of sight, hearing,
smell, touch, etc and constructs a mental image of outer
reality within their personal space. They mock up a picture of
it all. And they dub this mental image "REALITY!"
BUT IT'S ONLY A PICTURE!
This can be upgraded by adding senses which are created by
oneself. These are mental machines, and not very complex
ones either. One can see without eyes, hear without ears
when exterior/OOB. But this is only an upgrade, still not the
real thing. This is still maya. Illusion. Hallucination. (see The
Shape of Apparent "Truth") Oh sure, it's often far more
accurate than mere body senses if you have achieved a high
state. Here you get OOB with good visio, remote viewing, etc.
Great stuff, but still illusory because it is a picture! It's merely
a more accurate picture!
There is only one way to directly perceive/know real reality:
one must expand one's personal space (the space one is
being) to engulf the thing viewed, so that no longer is there
any separation or distance between observer and observed. It
lies within one instead. Buddha's pervasion drill and spacation
exercises are advised for this. Perhaps better drills will be
found in the future. This subject is still on a research line,
never mind all of the satisfied customers who have achieved
a little clearing and/or enlightenment and quit.
Remember, the clear cog applies to subjective reality,
PROCESSING AESTHETICS
Most of what needs to be said on this subject has already
been laid out by Max Sandor in his Purple Notebook. Read
his page first, then come back to this one. The techniques he
gives are great stuff. But it doesn't interest me particularly.
Want to know why?
I already ran it out years before I even knew Max existed. But
the METHOD I used to run it may be of interest to you. So
add this variant technique to Max's data.
First some theoretical background...
Aesthetics occurs in two places on the tone scale. Their
higher location is in the middle Thought band at
Consideration, werein creations are alter-ised by the addition
of meaning, importance or significance. A standard is created
by which a thing may be judged aesthetic or unaesthetic, to
be beautiful or ugly. The actual aesthetic sensation in
response to viewing is found lower down at tone 16.
Aesthetics forms a dichotomy. It is probably one of the top
dichotomies within Consideration's range of activity. Like with
any dichotomy, one end gets desired, while the other repelled
or not-ised. In this case, most people desire beauty and reject
ugliness. Most people. A few here and there however are
found in a peculiar case condition where they have inverted -that is to say, they have done a crossover and pursue
oppgoals. Such people are often suicidal, destructive, drug
users, rebels, and deliberately create art which is
astoundingly ugly.
Sounds sort of like punk rockers doesn't it?
PROCESSING SPACE
Some fundamental axioms and a few notes related to
processing space:
Life is both 1. a static of no motion and no qualities, and 2.
everything in all universes. This division into qualities
opposed to non-qualities must be maintained in order to stay
ignorant and located.
Life is both 1. awareness, and 2. unawareness. This division
into perception opposed to non-perception must be
maintained in order to stay ignorant and located.
Life is both 1. awareness of being one while being unaware of
being many, and 2. awareness of being many (no matter
where they are located) while knowing those many to be one.
This division into separate selves opposed to unity of selves
must be maintained in order to stay ignorant and located.
Beingness in a universe equals space. Theta is all space,
which is of course also none.
Pervasion of any space effectively exteriorizes the thetan
from it, i.e. the "view" is larger than the space.
(The "higher individual" or "source self" is already larger than
any space; and in fact is not located in this universe. Any
thetan can wake up in that higher "viewpoint". Decide to.)
Space is a separation or individuation of awareness of being
into isolated or semi-isolated beings.
(It is more than a "viewpoint of dimension", which statement is
so childish as to be below contempt.)
Axiom 12. Nice. He only missed the truth that theta (life) itself
is at all locations. And anytime theta duplicates, there is a
vanishing. He missed it is because he missed that whenever
theta is being/placing itself aware at one location, it is also
placing itself at all other locations, as unaware.
Axiom 13. Correct. "Create" at this level perhaps should be
written "form". But the idea is right. He mentions in passing in
the PDC that he spotted these various triangles as related to
one another; then never followed up on it by researching it
fully.
Axiom 14. Oops, he mixed the planes! Survive is the #8
purpose which is being slightly confused with the actions at
the #4. His statement is basically true because the higher
levels of reality control the lower ones, and the actions of alterisness and not-isness have their equivalents in the effort
band. But his statement reflects his mistake of ascribing all
command value to pursuit of goal #8, whereas each primal
dichotomy is a pursued goal, i.e. a command. There are scios
who postulate dynamics 9-16 as dynamics of survival. Nuhuh. The next level up from "Survive!" would be the dynamics
of affinity, the #7 purpose.
Axiom 15. Sure, why not? There are other ways to say that
which are just as true. For instance: "creation is accomplished
by a decision to be."
Axiom 16. Sure. Just keep in mind that theta is duplicating
itself, that each person is everything, everywhere, everywhen.
(If you wish to test this assertion for yourself, do the look at
oneself from a remote viewpoint process I found in Ken
Ogger's notes.)
Axiom 17. Sure. The most common alter-isness I've noticed
is tagging the creation with another creation, otherwise known
as significance or meaning.
Axiom 18. Correct. This observation is the basis of effective
therapy. There are different levels of this action, all of which
could be described as taking no responsibility for what was
created. In addition to not-isness, another good general name
for this action is "resistance".
Axiom 19. Technically this statement is not absolutely true at
all levels. In Axiom 19 he is describing his observation of the
fact that if you view as-is the alteration (significance or
meaning, which is on a scale of values, read Dennis
Stephens on value and importance) you will obtain a partial
relief. The next step would be to view perfectly (as-is) above
any conditions, as in Axiom 20.
Axiom 20. Perfect. Except that he misses that the person IS
the thing being vanished.
Axiom 21. Correct. This is a cycle like start-change-stop, and
its correct sequence is affinity-communication-reality.
Axiom 22. Correct. "Not-isness" represents a highest level of
resistance (Goal #4), whose equivalent in the ARC triangle of
understanding is agreement (forced reality) which seems to
drop down the CDEI scale passing through disagreement
(inhibit), unreality (no), etc.
Axiom 23. Oops, just mixed the planes again! He is
essentially correct because all the scales are united at the
top.
Axiom 24. Yes, and what I said about Axiom 23.
Axiom 25. Brilliant. The axiom is brilliant. The explanation
below it less than brilliant in a couple places, but overall this is
among his best work.
Axiom 32. Sure. And anything which you are not-being also.
This is why space could be described as the separation
between thetans, which statement is not perfectly true, but
please sight down the length of that finger...
Axiom 33. Okay. Therefore not-know and not-be are both
resistance/force. Allow me to point out that prior to this
happening the as-isness has to have been altered by a
consideration, otherwise no not-isness can occur. He goofed
on this one by using two terms of a triangle (as-is, alter-is, notis) to describe a dichotomy.
Axiom 34. This should have been Axiom 33. An isness, by
the way, is the persisting result of alter-isness.
Axiom 35. No, the ultimate is beyond the static: what we for
convenience call "native state". Native state is not static, not
everything, both static and everything, neither static nor
everything, and all those statements canceled out. Words are
impossible -- another finger pointing at the moon.
Axiom 36. Mask? That's an awfully solid word for something
done in near infinite joyous playfulness! The action looks
more like an idiot savant godbaby stacking blocks atop one
another. The first example he gives is not correct.
Axiom 37. Sure. The apparency is the consideration (alterisness), not the initial creation.
Axiom 38. True, but he uses a different definition for
"consideration" than he used earlier in axioms 28, 31 and 37.
What he meant to say is true, but he said it sloppily.
Axiom 39. A better statement would be to say that life creates
existences which are in opposing pairs, which forms a
problem by desiring one of each pair, and avoiding (not-ising)
the other.
Axiom 40. He didn't study enough Buddhism, otherwise this
would have been said more clearly. The CDEI (desire) aspect
is missing. A problem is any creation of which: 1. either the
existence is pursued and the non-existence denied, or 2. the
non-existence is pursued and the existence is denied.
Axiom 41. Yawn. He's thinking too hard. This is reasoned
from Axiom 40, not created as-is.
Axiom 42. Ditto.
Axiom 43. Mechanically truish, but only as apparency. This
one is dependent upon a standing consideration that a
creation only exists in the time of its initial creation. Given
that, yes.
Axiom 44. True. Also it has ALL locations in space and time.
Axiom 45. No, theta can consider itself conscious at a
specific limited location, and consider itself not-conscious at
all other locations.
Axiom 46. No, by posing itself as static pursuing MEST, it
denies being MEST, then fails because the postulate of a goal
is a preassumption of failing to reach that goal, followed by
switching poles to only being MEST (and denying being
static). The truth is that theta is both static AND MEST.
Axiom 47. True. Anything created can be uncreated.
Axiom 48. No, life is a game where theta as nothing pretends
that it isn't theta as MEST, and so pursues it. It's odd that he
acknowledges "theta as MEST" in this one, a fact that he
vehemently denies most of the time. It's as if he recognized
the fact, then covered it up again due to the fact that he was
with the distance per elapsed time placed after it. Instead even the
distance/time is multiplied times itself, so that if the distance is
expressed as miles and the time as seconds, then it's
miles/second times miles per second; which makes absolutely no
sense whatsoever in the real world. Even if we didn't do that and
only multiplied the numbers, I still don't know of anyone observing
anything travelling at at velocity, so I'm going to shelve that and
assume it's impossible. And if C squared is impossible, what does
that do to the formula? It turns it into E=MC: energy equals the
mass times the velocity.
THAT MAKES SENSE. Sounds rather like Napoleon's favorite
dictum that the impact of a military force equals its mass times its
velocity.
I mulled this over for a while.
Then I got to thinking about objects traveling at the speed of light,
which some people have said would acquire an "infinite" mass.
Also I've read physics books which claim that light has no mass.
But light is energy which was converted from mass, and light
travels at C! That's contradictory! How can it have an infinite mass
and no mass at the same time? Both of those have to be wrong
because: 1. light exerts a small amount of pressure against
anything it shines on. So it has SOME mass, but not much. Also:
2. light is bent by gravity, witnessed by graviational lensing effects
seen by astronomers. So the zero mass and the no mass ideas
are both wrong. Direct observation can prove it, so toss those old
theories!
So I next went back to basics and asked, what happens when a
mass is travelling at a high speed? It has more impact, i.e. more
energy. You can observe that just by getting hit by a baseball.
Therefore the correct formula is:
ENERGY EQUALS MASS TIMES VELOCITY.
And at some point in accelerating, a mass should lose its
characteristics of a solid and behave as energy.
We aren't finished. Einstein was good, but he should have paid
closer attention to Heisenburg. Heisenburg noticed that (roughly)
the more you know about the location of a particle, the less you
know about its energy. AND the converse: the more you know
about something's energy, the less you know about its location.
Add Hubbard into this next: the basic formula in universes is startchange-stop. In order to know something's position you must stop
its motion. In order to know something's energy, you must
measure the span of its changing positions, which means to treat it
as though it has a vast multitude of locations all at once. Change is
motion, that is to say an altering location, which is energy. And
stop is a fixed location, and anything stopped has no energy.
Which means:
MASS EQUALS ENERGY WITHOUT MOTION.
All of the above was done treating physical reality as a triangle of
nothing-energy-mass.
Well that was a relief! What else can I clarify? Let's drop the
triangle and rise one level in the structure of reality to dichotomies,
and deal with zero. If a zero is an impossibility, then why is it so
useful?
It's not impossible. This is going to sound horribly like bad
mahayana Buddhism, but zero is an existence which has no
existence.
Whew! That one was painful! Allow me to explain that, okay?
When I spotted the primal dichotomies I realized that all of
existence in universes (the apparencies) is arranged in these
pairs. My study of the Book of Lies (Crowley) had paid off,
because I could see that:
EVERY EXISTENCE IS BALANCED/OPPOSED BY A NONEXISTENCE.
So the physicists are flubbing badly in their search for anti-matter
to balance all the matter in the universe. They are correct that
matter is equally balanced by something. But it's not anti-matter
composed of positively charged electrons and negatively charged
protons.
MATTER IS BALANCED BY INFINITE NOTHINGNESS.
Mechanically, somethingnesses are held apart from one another
by nothingness. The nothingness is infinite (since a something is
an object to be perceived, this placed awareness in the
nothingness and unawareness in the somethings). The apparent
it does
> >bounce
> >around) to stay stopped, to stay in one place and
appear/disappear at
> >that location. Like I said: inertia. :)))
> >
>
> Now, in the above paragraph, I stumble on the next
"undefined" or "misdefined"
> word/concept: unmoving, or stopped, or "speed = 0".
> How does one define the speed of an object?
> The relativity introduces a concept of "observer's frame of
reference".
> Because, when we say that a particule is "appearing /
dissapearing /reappearing"
> in "the same place", what does that mean? This is ALSO
something relative,
> and not absolute. If I am viewing from a viewpoint in my
body, which is
> on Earth, then, the atoms in my laptop are staying (to a
marked degree,
> or macroscopically) at the same place. (Fortunately, or I
would have difficult
> to type this mail). But if my viewpoint is in the sun, all those
atoms are
> moving at a high speed (speed of the earth), and changing
place continuously.
>
> Axiom 1: STAYING IN THE SAME PLACE IS A RELATIVE
CONCEPT, and HAS NO ABSOLUTE
> MEANING.
> "Stopped" means simply: vibrating in a very close fixed
space, related to
> an observer.
> Corollary: MOVING IS ALSO RELATIVE (to the observer).
> Corollary: TIME IS ALSO RELATIVE (to the observer).
>
> It has only meaning relative to the observer, the viewpoint
and its fixed
> (relative to him, again!) anchorpoints.
>
> OK. I think the above can be used as fairly correct axioms
for the rest
> fof the discussion, and see where we arrive.
>
> With the above, we can try to define "matter" as "stopped
motion".
> Axiom 2: MATTER IS STOPPED MOTION IN RELATION
TO THE ANCHOR POINTS OF THE
> OBJECT.
>
> Definition: the anchor points of an object are its extreme
"corners". They
> are the anchor points of the space occupied by the object.
Like the 8 corners
> of an (cubical) ashtray, for example.
>
> Compared to those anchor points, the atoms stay more or
less in a fixed
> relative position.
>
> Does this idea work?
> - For solid: yes
> - For liquids: less
> - For gas: no: in a gas, molecules can move freely around.
They are not
> stacked and compressed like in a gas.
Hmm... the anchor points of matter are found, not in the
edges of the object, but beyond them in the larger spaces
within which the onject is found.
Reworked definition: the anchor points of an object are
know
unknown
wonder
curious
desired
enforced
inhibited
no
refused
false
denied
absurd
rationalized
abusive
horrible
compressed
conjured
recriminatory
Watching the Aspectika session it became very obvious to me
that a new, final button would have to be added to the CDEI
scale. That final button might not always come after
"recriminatory", it might appear higher up. For example,
"conjured" could well be the last hallucinatory creation in the
very act of beginning a new cycle. The final button appears on
the scale at the point where the goal failure is intolerable to
the person. The final button of the CDEI scale is:
SUBSTITUTE
Substitute ends the current goal by replacing it with a new
goal. This button is not only at the bottom of the CDEI scale, it
is also at the top above "not know" when working backwards
along a chain of goals, or along a single goal working back in
time. When a new goal is substituted for the failed old one,
the new goal then decays normally from the top at "not know"
Ouran
back to index
> I was running some Ifa polarities 2nite with great success.
>
> Then, inspired by the latest Pali-board message I sent you, I
tried
> successive viewpoint switching in relation to an anchorpoint.
>
> I took an anchorpoint, got the viewpoint, took that viewpoint
as
> an anchorpoint, found another viewpoint 'higher' or more
'distant'
> than the previous, hopped onto the other and so forth until
> floating without anchorpoint.
>
> Then, looking back down the chain of anchorpoints, I
spotted
> all serfacs nearly simultaneously :-)
>
> Great stuff :-)
>
> mx
It's simple enough to derive formal commands from that. In
both mental space and physical universe space, it is not
possible to place attention on the location of one's own
viewpoint, not without moving to a different viewpoint. A
habitual or stuck viewpoint becomes a blind spot. Enforced, it
leads to serfac phenomena.
This process is an undercut for scientology's Grade 4.
The action of creation, which is bringing something into
manifestation, requires that you not-be that which you are
creating. This be/not-be polarization creates the tone scale,
on which the action of creation places an arbitrary "spirit" high
on the scale, while the creation itself is dropped toward the
bottom of the scale as matter, energy, etc. Anchor/view
and those who are far away from me are the ones who have
known me.
On the day when I am close to you, you are far away from me,
and on the day when I am far away from you, I am close to you.
[I am ...] within.
[I am ...] of the natures.
I am [...] of the creation of the spirits.
[...] request of the souls.
I am control and the uncontrollable.
I am the union and the dissolution.
I am the abiding and I am the dissolution.
I am the one below,
and they come up to me.
I am the judgment and the acquittal.
I, I am sinless,
and the root of sin derives from me.
I am lust in (outward) appearance,
and interior self-control exists within me.
I am the hearing which is attainable to everyone
and the speech which cannot be grasped.
I am a mute who does not speak,
and great is my multitude of words.
Hear me in gentleness, and learn of me in roughness.
I am she who cries out,
and I am cast forth upon the face of the earth.
I prepare the bread and my mind within.
I am the knowledge of my name.
I am the one who cries out,
and I listen.
I appear and [...] walk in [...] seal of my [...].
I am [...] the defense [...].
I am the one who is called Truth
and iniquity [...].
For many are the pleasant forms which exist in numerous sins,
and incontinencies,
and disgraceful passions,
and fleeting pleasures,
which (men) embrace until they become sober
and go up to their resting place.
And they will find me there,
and they will live,
and they will not die again.
back to index
THE UNITYKEY
(The following consists of several messages from Dona trying
to put clearly in words what she is doing with clients in
session. At the bottom you will find several questions to ask
clients which are from notes I took during a telephone
conversation with Dona. WARNING: Use of this data requires
a WORKING ability to USE the following processing
techniques: EFT, TAT and PEAT.--Ouran)
UNITYKEY - what is it??
There is a theory that each "soul/being/person separated from
the "God essence" as a separate (individuated) aspect of that
essence. We are a part of the whole essence, yet our
individual essence is "one" aspect. In that we have ALL - we
are still ONE. Even though, we have all qualities.. there is
"one" that is ours to experience fully... I guess I would equate
it to our "soul purpose" This essence came into this 3-D plane
of existence and it sought to understand itself - to experience
its "self". It got caught in the mass of the 3-D atmosphere it
forgot (??) that the essence of self was within... and started to
look outside of self to differentiate. The quality of the essence
was still strong enough that the being could sense it, yet...
not experience it without outer references. As the being
searched outward for this expression of self - it met with the 3D masses and polarities were drawn in.
It located an experience that closely resembled its true
nature. Yet.. since it was outside of self... it could NEVER
truely re-create the beings essence. Feeling that this was "not
quite it" - and In disappointment and defeat - the being then
drew to it the opposite of the original outward expression (NOT to the essence within... since the essence of being is
UNITYKEY
We are all ONE (the BIG "ONE") and we are all "one"
(individual- the smaller "one") - a small "whole" within a bigger
"whole" within a bigger "whole" --- etc - probably to infinity!!
Microcosm is the macrocosm. Just as we are all one.. we are
ALSO individual. In that individual there is an essence.
Our existence is made up of many elements - many
DIFFERENT atoms which come together to make the whole.
Though this matter is the same (electron, proton, neutron)
they come together in the form of a different substance
(nitrogen, oxygen, hydrogen...)
It is this "ELEMENT" that I am talking about in the UNITYKEY.
Since we can look at the microcosm (the atom) and see the
macrocosm (us/being) I will conclude that we too have our
own "elemental essence" that is UNIQUE to us.
Take the concept of the atom... (atom/being): When an
electron in the outer ring of an atom is lost - it is unstable... as
in the case with free radicals. this atom "gone unstable" seeks
another atom to "grab" one of it's outer electrons. This than
"temporarily" stablizes the first atom - which creates instability
in the second. That second atom then either grabs that
electron back.. or finds another electron to grab. This is the
nature of our polarity system. When there is a "charge" we are
unstable and seek somehow to create stability (attracting an
opposite to "steal" it's charge to temporarily
stabilize/neutralize ourselves) PEAT brings the atom/being
I have been asking the people to come back for at least two
follow up visits. On one I have them do a TAT session (Tapas
Acupuncture Technique - this procedure was given to
everyone at the PEAT workshops - Zivorad got the idea of
PEAT from this technique)... anyone who does not have this,
and is interested, please backchannel me. I have them do
TAT on BOTH sides (Separately) of the PRIMES - I do the
first 4 questions and Muscle test (if you don't do that - you can
just use intuition - or ask the person) if any of the other
questions are necessary.
middle is 'it'.
This 'sattva' is a viewpoint that could also be called an entity
representing YOU. A temporary mask created specificially for
the purpose of the experience what's in between the poles.
All gunas are overlaying and connected. It's a dense network.
Taking out one messed up polarity doesn't mean one has
solved 'everything'.
The linear view of the 'basic' is Western cause-effect thinking.
One *sole* cause is assigned an effect. This is one of the
biggest crazinesses of western thinking, right next to the b/w
thinking (or may be even: the b/w thinking is a result of solecause thinking).
There is a Pnohteftu article on Cause-Effect thinking..
With 'Web-thinking' rather than linear thinking, everything gets
more 'correct' in one's space.
It is vital to get an intuitive understanding of the 'gunas' rather
than an abstract one.
Guna processing fails utterly when someone is convinced
that a bright white light is female (tamas/yin) - which
happened the other day. Quote: "But the bride in wedding
gown is all in white on her wedding day, isn't she?"
One develops a *third* observation point which will develop
into the 'equinamity' frequency of Buddhism. This is the *true*
sattva position. Most newagers got this completely wrong and
confuse unclean rajas parts with the sattva.
It is a truly unbiased position from which one can now stretch
into infinite space/consciousness, etc. This is the TRUE
BASIC of enlightenment.
I WAS LUCKY
I guess I was a lucky kid. In addition to being lucky, I was able
to see with some clarity despite being a misemotional,
confrontational and just plain screwed up brat.
I never got trapped in the heaven and hell, God vs Devil crap
this lifetime like so many people. When I was a little kid my
parents used to take me to church occasionally. It was a
protestant church, which was damned lucky, I'd have been in
trouble if my parents had been Catholics.
So anyway, when I was about 7 years old a minister took me
aside to a private room to explain God to me.
Keep in mind that at 7 years old I was precocious,
disconcertingly intelligent, obnoxious, and an arrogant little
shit. Come to think of it, I haven't changed much in overall
personality, except that I'm much more loving and cheery
now.
So the minister goes into this long, involved spiel telling me all
about how God is everywhere and made everything and that
we are his children and that God is in each and every one of
us, that there's a divine spark in all of us...
I cognited.
"Oh I get it," I told him brightly, "We are God! All of us
together make up God!"
"Oh, nononono!" the minister protested in horror, "That wasn't
what I meant at all! That's WRONG."
To my credit I didn't believe him. Instead of being crushed and
Ouran
back to index
RANDOM ANCEDOTES
(These are some things I've done and experienced which
might shed light on who I am and why I am the way I am to
anyone interested in such things.)
I was living in Seattle about 30 years ago, and helping out as
"staff" at the Seattle Org. During that time I created an entity,
right under Dorothy Broaded's nose! Here she was OT
Something (six I think) and well past the BT materials in OT
III, and I was "only" Grade IV and not supposed to know
anything about such things. Nevertheless I made one inside
the org! It was a single purpose entity, what I prefer to call a
"thoughtform." As you might know, any person possesses the
capacity to create static or near static. This can range from
making an exact duplicate of self, down through various sorts
of fragments and remote viewpoints, to quite simple
programmed bits of beingness. What happened in Seattle
was one of those latter: I was running the mimeograph, had
my attention off the machine for a moment, when suddenly a
part flew off it! I immediately shut it off, then turned it slowly by
hand to see what was missing. I located the spot on the
mimeo machine where a piece of it had come loose, but try as
I could, I failed to locate the part anywhere on the floor. I was
sort of desperate. The mimeo couldn't be used without it, and
I had a lot of bulletins to do. Finally I stopped searching. I
calmed my mind to zero, then moved to the moment that the
part had flown off. As I did so, I took a small bit of energy,
attached a purpose to it, added intention and near static -and separated the construction from myself. The mini-entity
flew to the mimeo machine, then traced the path of the
missing part through the air while I watched. It flew under a
nearby table, which had an shelf edge reaching almost to the
floor. I walked over to the table, reached my body's hand
under at the point where the entity had gone -- and there was
my missing part. I screwed it back on the machine and
continued working.
All in all, it now looks like an overly complex ritual to go
through just to find something, but please understand that I
was 19 years old at the time. Rather than thoughtforms, I now
find things with fields of flitter into which I temporarily assume
a remote viewpoint; which still isn't "know" but I do what I can
with what I have available. Both of these abilities turn off and
on as I key in and out. Usually they are off, but...
It was the summer I turned 20 years old. One Monday night I
had a dream. In the morning I had forgotten it. On Tuesday
night I had the dream again, and forgot it again. This
happened five nights in a row. On Saturday morning two
friends and I drove to the park at Mount Rainier for a day on
the mountain. In late afternoon we started back down. It had
rained a little that afternoon so the asphalt was wet. The car
was doing perhaps 45 mph down the mountain when the semibald tires broke free going into a curve. My friend Barry, who
was driving, slammed on the brakes. We skidded off the
curve and hit the side of the mountain head-on at full speed.
No one was wearing seat belts. I'm not sure that old '53 Ford
even had seat belts. As we went into the slide I remembered
all five dreams in perfect detail in a split second of time. All
five dreams had been about the accident I was in the middle
of experiencing. In the all the dreams I went face first into the
windshield shattering the glass. In three of the dreams my
head went so far through that the glass cut my throat and I
died (an older car like that had "safety glass" which was a
sandwich construction with plastic in the middle which kept
the broken area smaller). In the other two dreams I saw
myself raising both my hands out of my lap and jamming them
forcefully into the angle where windshield and dashboard met.
Armed with this knowledge (keep in mind I was reviewing all
this in a leisurely manner in less than a second of material
HUMOR
(I consider anyone without a sense of humor to be suspect.
Humorlessness usually indicates a lot of force in the mind.
Perhaps you'll be happy to know I do possess a sense of
humor. Perhaps not, because my sense of humor tends
toward the obnoxious...)
Shakespeare in the Ground
(For Raymond J. Krenik, Jr)
BT or not BT, that is the congestion:
Whether 'tis negative gain in the mind to process
The sensations and aberrations of outrageous cases,
Or to take emeters against a sea org of entities,
And by ownership end them? To survive? to eat?
No more goals please; and by Dianetic process to say we end
The heart-ache and the thousand natural somatics
That flesh is heir to, 'tis a cycle of action
Devoutly to be wish'd. To audit, to not;
Dramatized? Perchance to discharge: ay, there's the ridge;
For in what secondary engram what dirty needle may come.
When we have soloed off this overt/withhold,
Must give us a clean slate: there's the reality
That makes certainty of so long fall a blow down;
For who would bear the sore butt of 12 hours in the chair,
The cushion's imprint, the proud back's creakage,
The pangs of sleeping feet, the CS's delay,
The insolence of ethics and the HGC
The staff PCs on the unworthy take,
When he himself might his own quick case crack
With one model session? Who would with RPFers bear,
To grunt and sweat under a weary life,
But that the dread of something worse than death,