Pavement Design Spreadsheet - CCAA Method

Prepared by :
Navaeed Khodabakus
Design Manager
KBR - Asia Pacific
Pavement Design ( Wheel Loading ) - Using CCAA Approach
Not Scale
320 KN
320 KN
5.00 m
A concrete pavement is to be designed to support loading from mining trucks with an axle load of 640 kN with a wheel
spacing of 4.97 m. All areas of the pavement may be traversed by the mining truck. The pavement design shall be designed
for an operating life of 20 years, and it has been estimated that an average of 25 daily load repetitions may occur.
Wheel Spacing =
Truck Axel Load =
Pavement life span =
Truck repetition =
5.00
640
20
25
1.
The Soil Profile
1. 1
Soil Layer
m
kN
Years
times/day * or equal to =
130000
Depth (Hi)
Sands/Gravels - Dense
1.0
times / 20 Years -
0 m
Comments
BASE
CBR=8%
work days
Based on Geotechnical Report
0 m
0 m
0 m
ROCK
-
Note : *) Assumption
(Table 1.1)
1. 2
Uniform Modulus Young (Ese)
The equation to determine the Young's Modulus of an equivalent uniform soil layer is as follows :
n
W fi . H i
E se=
i=1
Hi = thickness of layer i (m)

Esi = Young's modulus of layer i (Mpa)
i=1 s
Where
W fi . H i / E si
W fi = weighting factor for layer i

n = total number of layers in layered profile
Prepared by :
Navaeed Khodabakus
Design Manager
KBR - Asia Pacific
Soil Surface
Soil Surface
Zi
Layer i
Hi
Esi
Ese
(figure 1.2.a Young Modulus of an equivalent uniform soil layer)
wheel loading :
X=S (wheel Spacing (m))
post loading :
X=f(x,y) (average post spacing (m))
distributed loading : X=(aisle or loading width (m))
( figure 1.2.b Weighting factor Wfi, for the estimation of Young's modulus for an equivalent layer - Scaled)
using figure 1.2, Ese (Wheel Loading) :

W f1 -->
z1 =
0.50 m =
0.10
applied to figure 1.2b, W f1 =
0.90
H1 =
1.0 m
Prepared by :
Navaeed Khodabakus
Design Manager
KBR - Asia Pacific
5.00 m
W f2 -->
z2 =
X
0.00 m =
5.00 m
0.00
applied to figure 1.2, W f2 =
0.00
H2 =
W f3 -->
z3 =
x
1.00 m =
5.00 m
0.20
0.00
H3 =
W f4 -->
z4 =
x
1.00 m =
5.00 m
0.20
0.00
H4 =
W fi . H i =
( 0.90 x 1.0
)+
( 0.00 x
0.0 ) +
( 0.00 x
0.00 ) +
( 0.00 x
0 ) = 0.9
i=1
1. 3
Calculating Young's Modulus on each layer (Hi)
(figure 1.2.c Correlation between long-term

Young's Modulus Esi and CBR)
(figure 1.2.d Correlation between short-term Young's

Modulus Es, N from SPT and Plasticity index)
The relationship beetween short-term and long term values of Es can be expressed as :
Ess (short term) = Esl (longterm) / Beta
Soil type
Gravels
Sands
Silts, silty clays
Stiff clays
Soft clays
Correlation factor, Beta

0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.4
Based on soil property, the Young's modulus for each layer :

Es1
Assume soil : sand/gravel, with Young Modulus Value 20-50 Mpa, Use : 25 Mpa
Es =
25
MPa
Prepared by :
Navaeed Khodabakus
Design Manager
KBR - Asia Pacific
Es2
SPT (N) =
Es =
### MPa
Es3
SPT (N) =
Es =
### MPa
Es4
SPT (N) =
Es =
### MPa
( 0.90 x 1.0 ) +
( 25.00 )
W fi. H i/ E si=
i=1 s
( 0.00 x 0.0 ) +
( 0.00 )
( 0.00 x 0.00 ) +
( 0.00 )
( 0.00 x
0 )=
( 0.00 )
0.036
W fi . H i
So,
i=1
E se=
i=1 s
25
Mpa
W fi . H i / E si
Equivalent Young's Modulus for the 1-m deep layer is
25
MPa
1. 4 Flexural Strenght of Concrete

The design Flextural strenght of the concrete is determined from equation :
fall = k1.k2.f'cf
Where :
k1 = Material factor
k2 = load repetition factor
f'cf = characteristic flextural tensile strength of concrete (Mpa)
Assume the value k1 =
Loading type
wheel
Post
Distributed
0.9
based on table below
range of k1
0.85-0.95
0.75-0.85
0.75-0.85
In order to determine the k2 factor, the number of repetitious over ### years for a daily repetitin of ### is 130000
over the design life.
Using Table below the k2 factor is
Load Repetitions
Unlimited
400000
300000
200000
100000
50000
0.6
Load Repetition factor, k2

0.50
0.51
0.52
0.54
0.56
0.59
Prepared by :
Navaeed Khodabakus
Design Manager
KBR - Asia Pacific
30000
10000
20000
1000
0.60
0.64
0.70
0.73
The value of f'cf = 0.7 (fc')0.5

f'cf =
So, Fall =
1. 4
0.9
( based on RTA - NSW 1993)

(
x 3.96 = 2.138 MPa
0.6
32
)0.5 =
0.7 x
assumed Fc' = ### Mpa
3.96 MPa
Concrete Thickness Due to INTERIOR Loading

The base thickness may now be determined based on the interior and edge loading conditions.
for interior loading
F1 = Fall FE1 FH1 FS1 k3 k4
Where :
Fall = design tensile stregth of concrete (Mpa)
FE1 = Factor for short-term Young's modulus, Ess (of equivalent uniform layer of soil)
FH1 = factor for depth of equivalent uniform layer of soil, H
FS1 = Factor of center to center spacing wheel
k3 = calibration factor for geothechnical behavior = 1.2 for internal loading
= 1.5 for edge loading
k4 = calibration factor for concrete strength
using table below

fc'
###
###
###
###
###
k4
0.03
1.07
1.12
1.16
1.20
for Fc' = 32MPa

Using Chart 1.4.1
k4 =
1.12
Prepared by :
Navaeed Khodabakus
Design Manager
KBR - Asia Pacific
(Chart 1.4.1 Correlation between short-term Youngs E ss and FE1)
FE1 =
for Es = ### Mpa
1.19
Using Chart 1.4.2
(Chart 1.4.2 Correlation between Wheel spacing and FS1)
for S = 5 m
Using Chart 1.4.3
FS1 =
1.20
Prepared by :
Navaeed Khodabakus
Design Manager
KBR - Asia Pacific
(Chart 1.4.3 Correlation between depth soil layer and FS 1)
FH1 =
for H = 9 m
k3 =
1.20
1.2 (for internal loading)
so, F1 = Fall FE1 FH1 FS1 k3 k4

F1 = 2.138 x
1.19 x
1.2 x
1.2 x
1.2 x
1.12
F1 = 4.925
From chart 1.4.4
(Chart 1.4.4 Slab Thickness and F1)
t1 =
1. 5
375 say
375 mm
Concrete Thickness Due to Edge Loading

The base thickness may now be determined based on the interior and edge loading conditions.
for edge loading
F2 = Fall FE2 FH2 FS2 k3 k4
Prepared by :
Navaeed Khodabakus
Design Manager
KBR - Asia Pacific
Where :
Fall = design tensile stregth of concrete (Mpa)
FE2 = Factor for short-term Young's modulus, Ess (of equivalent uniform layer of soil)
FH2 = factor for depth of equivalent uniform layer of soil, H
FS2 = Factor of center to center spacing wheel
k3 = calibration factor for geothechnical behavior = 1.2 for internal loading
= 1.5 for edge loading
k4 = calibration factor for concrete strength
using table below
k4
fc'
###
###
###
###
###
k4 =
0.03
1.07
1.12
1.16
1.20
1.12
Using Chart 1.5.1
(Chart 1.5.1 Correlation between short-term Youngs E ss and FE2)
for Es = 25 Mpa
Using Chart 1.5.2
FE2 =
1.25
Prepared by :
Navaeed Khodabakus
Design Manager
KBR - Asia Pacific
(Chart 1.5.2 Correlation between Wheel spacing and FS2)
for S = 5 m
FS2 =
1.15
Using Chart 1.5.3
(Chart 1.5.3 Correlation between depth soil layer and FS 1)
for H = 9 m
k3 =
FH2 =
1.2
1.05 (for internal loading)
Prepared by :
Navaeed Khodabakus
Design Manager
KBR - Asia Pacific
so, F2 = Fall FE2 FH2 FS2 k3 k4

F2 =
2.138 x
F2 =
4.338
1.25 x
1.2 x
1.15 x
1.05 x
1.12
From chart 1.5.4.
(Chart 1.5.4 Slab Thickness and F 2)
t2 =
600 mm
The interior and edge loading conditions indicate that a 375 and
600 thick base is required
respectively. Using Table 1.20 ( clause 3.4.13 ), the recommended distance, e, for edge base thickening
is 8t for a stiff soil support. Therefore, the edge of the base 600 mm thick and the thickness varies for
a total distance of 8 x 375 mm = 3000 mm from the edge
1. 6
Reinforcement for internal Slab

A. Reinforcement are required for shrinkage
Assume control joint spacing, L =
So, Asreq = 18 t . L / fs
t=
L=
fsy =
fs =
(mm2/m)
375 mm
5 m
500 Mpa
0.67 fsy = 335 MPa
Asreq =
101 mm2/m
m
(Eqn E2 - Page 83 CCAA)
Prepared by :
Navaeed Khodabakus
Design Manager
KBR - Asia Pacific
B. Minimum tensile strength base on As 3600-2001 cl.9.1.1

Ast = Rho * b.d
Rho=
b=
D=
d0 =
Ds =
d=
0.002
1000
375
75
16
276
Ast =
552
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
(Concrete Cover)
(Steel Diameter)
mm2/m
C. Reinforcement in secondary direction in unrestrained slabs

(AS 3600 cl 9.4.3.3)
Minimum Reinforcement area Ast
Ast = (1.75-2.5 Tcp) b.D X 10-3
Ast = (1.75-2.5 * 0) * 1000 * 501 * 10 -3
Ast =
483
So, Use N16-300

EW
EF
mm2
--> As =
670
mm2/m
SUMMARY :
800
N16 - 300
150
375
600
1500
1500
Prepared by :
Navaeed Khodabakus
Design Manager
KBR - Asia Pacific
Southern Regional Water Pipeline (SRWP) Project

Area 54 - Chambers Flat
Amenity Building
Date
Rev.
Eng.
: 02-Aug-2007
:0
: Andre Maulana (JEC)
Base Plate Design (SHS Column) - Pinned Type Connection

1. Design action (maximum load case) for base plate
Based on the design calculation for SHS column:
For tension:
Nt* = (0.9 x 3.23) + (-20)
For shear:
V* = (2.36 kNm / 4 m)
=
=
-17.09 kN
0.59 kN
2. Check bolt capacity

Ntb
N*t
<
Nt* = the design tension in the column
where:
= 17.09 kN
Ntb = the capacity of the bolt group in tension
V* =
0.59 kN
Bolt design
(See AISC connection manual [2] - Appendix: A, Table A.2.1)
using:
no of bolts =
2
type of bolts =
M20 (4.6/S bolts)
axial tension (Ntf) =
78.4 kN
shear value (Vtf) =
44.6 kN
Ntb = 156.8 kN
>
N*t
Ok!
checking combined shear and tension per bolt:

Nt*f = 17.09 / 2 =
8.545 kN
V*f = 0.59 / 2 =
0.295 kN
therefore:
(8.545/78.4) + (0.295/44.6) =
0.1
<
Ok!
1.0
3. Check the plate capacity for axial tension in the column

Ns
N*t
<
where: Ns = design strength of steel base plate in bending due to axial tension in column
B plate =
W plate =
Sg =
dc SHS =
1/2 bfo =
Ns =
yi
( d c2 +2 bfo2 ) t i2 x nb
where:
s gd c
ti =
fyi =
nb =
=
therefore:
Ns = 549.72 kN
2
16 mm
250 Mpa
2 nos
0.9
>
240
95
160
75
82.5
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
Check Ns value:
(2)^0.5 x bfo = 233.3
>
dc
(See AISC connection manual [2] clause 4.12.4)

; base plate thickness
; base plate yield strength
; bolt(s) numerous
N*t = 17.09 kN
Ok!
4. Check welds
Nw
N*t
<
where: Nw = design capacity of fillet weld at base of column subject to axial tension in column
= VwLw
(See AISC connection manual [2] clause 4.12.4)
0.978 kN/mm' ; fillet welds design capacity (using E48XX)
where: Vw =
Lw =
300 mm
; total length of filllet welds around column section profile
Nw =
293.4 kN
>
N*t = 17.09 kN
Ok!
5. Check the plate capacity for axial compression in the column
BasePlate_R0
Page 25 of 37
02/14/2016

Amenity Building
BasePlate_R0
Page 26 of 37
02/14/2016

Amenity Building
Date
Rev.
Eng.
: 06-Aug-2007
:1
Bracing Connection
1. Design action (maximum load case) for base plate
Based on the Microstran results for roof-bracing system:
N* =
18.3 kN
15
Member: 35
75x75x6.0EA
3000
3
14
3000
2. Bolt design
type = M20 8.8/S
nos =
2
Checking the bolt capacity:
Vf = 0.62fufkr( ncAc )
; (See AS 4100 Clause 9.3.2.1, Table 9.3.1, Table 9.3.2.1)
= 0.8 x 0.62 x 830 x 1.0 x ( 1 x 225 ) / 1000
=
92.6 kN
Capacity of two bolts =
185 kN
>
N*
Ok!
3. Roof Bracing
Using 75x75x6.0EA
N* =
18.3 kN
N*
<
Nt
crossed back-to-back.
(Grade 350)
; (See AS 4100 Clause 7.1)

= 0.9
Nt = Ag fy
= 867 x 320
=
277 kN
; (See AISC design capacity tables for structural steel, Vol.1, Table 3.1-9(A)-2)
Ag =
867 mm2
Nt = 0.85 kt An fu
= 0.85 x 0.85 x (867 - 6.0x22) x 440
=
234 kN
Nt = 0.9 x 277 =
249.3 kN
>
fy =
320 Mpa
; (See AISC design capacity tables for structural steel, Vol.1, Table 3.1-9(A)-2)
Ag =
867 mm2
fu =
440 Mpa
kt =
0.85 (See AS 4100 Table 7.3.2 (i), correction factor)
N*
Ok!
Thus, the connection could use 75x75x6.0EA with 2-M20 8.8/S bolts.
BraceCon_R0
Page 27 of 37
02/14/2016

Amenity Building
BraceCon_R0
Page 28 of 37
02/14/2016

Amenity Building
Date
Rev.
Eng.
: 06-July-2007
:0
Purlin design
1
Cees purlin on 3 meters span

qu2 = peak pressure
qu1 = max. wind pressure
1.800 (s)
1.200 (0.2d)
3.000 (L)
Section data
Span length of purlin design,
Peak Pressure length (0.2d, 0.2b, or h)
Assuming purlin-to-purlin span
Lmax =
a=
=
3.0 m
1.2 m
1.2 m
Design loads on purlin

Wind actions on purlin:
Taken from loadings calculation:
PW = #REF! kN/m2
PL = #REF! kN/m2
UpWind pressure
DownWind pressure
Govern
note: all pressures has included internal pressures
Peak presuure load design:

Local pressure factor,
Local pressure load
Wind pressure design:
Width load,
Wind pressure,
Peak pressure,
Kl =
1.5
PP = #REF! kN/m2
W L1 =
1.2 m
qu1 = #REF! kN/m'
qu2 = #REF! kN/m'
Moment maximum design:

Mu1 = 1/8 qu1 L^2 = #REF!
#REF! kNm
Mu2 = 1/2 x (qu2 x a) x (3.6/2) - 1/2 x qu x (a/2)^2
= #REF!
#REF! kNm
Mu total = Mu1 + Mu2 = #REF!
#REF! kNm
qu' = Mu total / (1/8 x L^2) =

l
Check design
Take lysaght cee purlins:
C15015, type: single spans with 1 bridge,
#REF! kN/m'
Check ratio:
qu'
#REF!
Ratio = #REF!
Check deflection
Assumed purlin length,
Modulus elasticity,
Second moment of area,
Deflection max,
= (5qu' x Lp^3)/(384EI) =
Purlin-design_R0
qu =
qu
5.45 kN/m'
#REF!
#REF!
Lp =
3.1 m
E = 2.00E+08 kPa
I = 1.61E-06 m4
max = Lp/250 = 0.012 m
#REF!
#REF! m
Page 29 of 37
#REF!
02/14/2016

Amenity Building
Cees purlin on 3.6 meters span

qu2 = peak pressure
qu1 = max. wind presure
2.400 (s)
1.200 (0.2d)
3.000 (L)
Section data
600
Lmax =
a=
=
3.6 m
1.2 m
1.2 m
L=
(c)
3.0 m
c=
0.6 m

UpWind pressure
DownWind pressure
PW = #REF! kN/m2
PL = #REF! kN/m2
Govern

Local pressure load
Width load,
Wind pressure,
Peak pressure,
Kl =
1.5
PP = #REF! kN/m2
W L1 =
1.2 m
qu1 = #REF! kN/m'
qu2 = #REF! kN/m'

Mu1 = qu1 x (L^2 - c^2)^2 / 8 x L^2 =
#REF! kNm
Mu2 = 1/2 x (qu2 x a) x (3.6/2) - 1/2 x qu x (a/2)^2
= 1/2x(x0.012) x (0.00000161/2) - #REF! kNm
Mu total = #REF! kNm
qu' = Mu total / (1/8 x L^2) =
Check design
C15015, type: double continous with 1 bridge,
#REF! kN/m'
Check ratio:
qu'
#REF!
Ratio = #REF!
Check deflection
Assumed purlin length,
Modulus elasticity,
Second moment of area,
Deflection max,
= (5qu' x Lp^3)/(384EI) =
Purlin-design_R0
qu
qu =
3.78 kN/m'
#REF!
#REF!
Lp =
3.7 m
E = 2.00E+08 kPa
I = 1.61E-06 m4
max = Lp/250 = 0.015 m
#REF!
#REF! m
Page 30 of 37
#REF!
02/14/2016

Amenity Building
Purlin-design_R0
Page 31 of 37
02/14/2016

Amenity Building
Date
Rev.
Eng.
: 06-July-2007
:0
Purlin design
qu2 = peak pressure
qu1 = max. wind presure
2.400 (s)
1.200 (0.2d)
3.600 (L)
Section data
Lmax =
a=
=
3.6 m
1.2 m
1.2 m

UpWind pressure
DownWind pressure
PW = #REF! kN/m2
PL = #REF! kN/m2
Govern

Local pressure load
Width load,
Wind pressure,
Peak pressure,
Kl =
1.5
PP = #REF! kN/m2
W L1 =
1.2 m
qu1 = #REF! kN/m'
qu2 = #REF! kN/m'

Mu1 = 1/8 qu1 L^2 = #REF!
#REF! kNm
#REF!
a
1.2
a( Ls
1.2(3.62.4
Mu2 = qu 2
a
2 = 1.21
1.2
2 = #REF! kNm
Ls
s+
3.62 .4
2 . 4+
L
2
3 .6
2
2(L )
2(3.6)
qu' = Mu total / (1/8 x L^2) =
Check ratio:
qu'
#REF!
Ratio = #REF!
#REF! kN/m'
Check design
qu =
qu
2.99 kN/m'
#REF!
#REF!
Mu2 = 1/2 x (qu2 x a) x (3.6/2) - 1/2 x qu x (a/2)^2

= #REF!
= #REF!
Purlin-design_X
Page 32 of 37
02/14/2016

Amenity Building
qu2 = peak pressure

qu1 = max. wind pressure
2.400 (s)
1.200 (0.2d)
3.000 (L)
Section data
Lmax =
a=
=
3.0 m
1.2 m
1.2 m

PW = #REF! kN/m2
PL = #REF! kN/m2
UpWind pressure
DownWind pressure
Govern

Local pressure load
Width load,
Wind pressure,
Peak pressure,
Kl =
1.5
PP = #REF! kN/m2
W L1 =
1.2 m
qu1 = #REF! kN/m'
qu2 = #REF! kN/m'

Mu1 = 1/8 qu1 L^2 = #REF!
#REF! kNm
#REF!
a
1.2
a( Ls
1.2(3.62.4
Mu2 = qu 2
a
2 = 1.21
1.2
2 = #REF! kNm
Ls
s+
3.62 .4
2 . 4+
L
2
3 .6
2
2(L )
2(3.6)
qu' = Mu total / (1/8 x L^2) =
Check ratio:
qu'
#REF!
Ratio = #REF!
#REF! kN/m'
Check design
qu =
qu
4.31 kN/m'
#REF!
#REF!
Mu2 = 1/2 x (qu2 x a) x (3.6/2) - 1/2 x qu x (a/2)^2

= #REF!
= #REF!
Purlin-design_X
Page 33 of 37
02/14/2016

Amenity Building
Date
Rev.
Eng.
: 28-June-2007
:0
Strip-Footing Analysis
G
Wu
precast
panel
H-wall
slab
ground
strip-footing
G = permanent load of wall

Wu = wind action
L=
B=
D=
300
1000 mm
600 mm
300 mm
; assumption for analysis
600
Soil Pressure Analysis

Based on design criteria:
Concrete strength, f'c
Allowable soil bearing pressure
=
=
Working loads: Precast concrete walls, G

Wind loads, Wu
Ultimate design load:

Soil pressure:
N* =
=
=
Total Loads =
32 Mpa
150 kPa
76 kN
5.6 kN
81.6 kN
1.2G + Wu = 1.2x76 + 5.6 =
; See: Loadings (Rev-3) calculation sheet
96.8 kN
assumed that there is no uniform soil pressure
Maximum soil pressure =

Design/Capacity Ratio =
81.6 / (0.4 x 3.0) =

68/150 =
68 kPa
0.453
Ok!
Factored soil pressure =

96.8/81.6 x 68 =
80.67/150 =
80.67 kPa
0.538
Ok!
N16-300
Concrete Design
Concrete strength, f'c
Overall depth
Top bar cover
Nominal bar diameter
Effective depth
Flexural strength, f'cf
l
; Multiple panels 3000x7000x150mm thk
N12 -200 T&B
=
D=
=
=
d=
=
32 Mpa
300 mm
50 mm
16 mm
234 mm
0.6x(f'c)^1/2 =
50
300
600
3.4 Mpa
Reinforcement
Check reinforcement:
take
4 N16
@
300 mm spacing
check transverse spacing = (1000-2x50-16)/3
=
295 mm
4 nos of N16 bars,
Ast = 803.84 mm2
Reinforcement ratio,
Strip-Foot_R0
<
300 mm
p = Ast / (b x d) =
0.0057
p* = 0.22 (D/d)^2 x f'cf / fsy= 0.22 (300/234)^2 x 3.4/500 =
Page 34 of 37
Ok!
0.0025
02/14/2016

Amenity Building
Use p =
Bending Moment
Muo.min =
0.006
1.2f'cfZ = 0.12 (f'c)^0.5 b D^2 =

0.12 x 0.8 x (25)^0.5 x 600 x (0.4)^2 =
Mu = A f d 1
st
sy
pf sy
1 .7f ' c
29.33/71.28 = 0.4115
29.33 kNm
71.28 kNm
Ok!
The strip footing use N16 - 300 for reinforcing bars.
Crack control reinforcement:

Refer to AS 3600 Clause 8.6, the longitudinal reinforcement will use 12mm bars at 200 mm centres.
The strip footing use N12 - 200 for longitudinal rebars.
Strip-Foot_R0
Page 35 of 37
02/14/2016

Amenity Building
Date
Rev.
Eng.
: 4-July-2007
:0
Slab Concrete Design

Top cover
40
150
40
Bottom cover
Metre Width Section of Slab
Design Data
Concrete strength,
Flexural strength,
Slab depth,
Concrete cover
Assumption length,
Min. reinforcement ratio
f'c =
f'cf =
D=
=
b=
pmin =
32
3.39
150
40
1000
0.002
Mpa
Mpa
mm
mm
mm
=
; f'cf = 0.6 (f'c)^0.5
0.2 %
; Refer to AS 3600 Clause 9.1.1.c
Check Bending Moment

Muo.min = 1.2f'cfZ = 0.8 1.2 f'cf (1/6 bD^2)
= 0.8 x 1.2 x 3.39 x (1/6 x 1000 x 0.15^2)
=
12.2 kNm
l
; Refer to AS 3600 Clause 8.1.4.1
Check Moment capacity

Using N16@200 centres
( fsy =
500 Mpa )
Effective depth,
d = 150 - 40 - 8 =
102 mm
Area of reinforcement,
Ast = 3.14 x (8^2/0.2) =
1005 mm2
p = 1005 / 102000 = 0.0099
=
Mu =
A stf syd 1
k u
2
; where:
0.99 %
= 0.85 - 0.007 (f'c - 28) =

0.822
ku = pfsy / 0.85f'c
= (0.0099 x 500) / (0.85 x 32 x 0.822)
ku = 0.221
Mu = -0.8 x 1005 x 0.5 x 0.102 x ( 1 - (0.822 x 0.221)/2 )

= -37.28 kNm
0.33
Ok!
Using SL82 square mesh

( fsy =
500 Mpa )
Effective depth,
d = 150 - 40 - 4 =
106 mm
Ast =
Area of reinforcement,
454 mm2
p = 454 / 106000 =
0.0043
=
Mu =
A stf syd 1
k u
2
; where:
0.43 %
= 0.85 - 0.007 (f'c - 28) =

0.822
ku = pfsy / 0.85f'c
= (0.0043 x 500) / (0.85 x 32 x 0.822)
ku = 0.096
Mu = -0.8 x 454 x 0.5 x 0.106 x ( 1 - (0.822 x 0.096)/2 )

= -18.49 kNm
Slab_R0
0.66
Ok!
Page 36 of 37
02/14/2016

Amenity Building
Shear capacity
Vuc =
1 b v d o
[ ]
A st f ' c
bv d o
1
3
; where: do = d
Vuc = d pf ' 3
1 [
c]
; where:
and
1000 m
1 = 1.1 ( 1.6 - ( do/1000 )) > 1.1 =
For SL82 square mesh

p=
0.43 %
Vuc = 0.7 x 1.64 x 106 x (0.0043 x 32)^(1/3) =
Slab_R0
bv=b=
1.64
62.8 kN
Page 37 of 37
02/14/2016

Pavement Design Spreadsheet - CCAA Method

Încărcat de

Informații document

Drepturi de autor

Formate disponibile

Partajați acest document

Partajați sau inserați document

Opțiuni de partajare

Vi se pare util acest document?

Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

Pavement Design Spreadsheet - CCAA Method

Încărcat de

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

Prepared by :

Pavement Design ( Wheel Loading ) - Using CCAA Approach

The Soil Profile

Based on Geotechnical Report

Uniform Modulus Young (Ese)

Hi = thickness of layer i (m)

W fi = weighting factor for layer i

(figure 1.2.a Young Modulus of an equivalent uniform soil layer)

X=S (wheel Spacing (m))

X=f(x,y) (average post spacing (m))

distributed loading : X=(aisle or loading width (m))

using figure 1.2, Ese (Wheel Loading) :

applied to figure 1.2b, W f1 =

applied to figure 1.2, W f2 =

applied to figure 1.2, W f3 =

applied to figure 1.2, W f4 =

Calculating Young's Modulus on each layer (Hi)

(figure 1.2.c Correlation between long-term

(figure 1.2.d Correlation between short-term Young's

Correlation factor, Beta

Based on soil property, the Young's modulus for each layer :

Equivalent Young's Modulus for the 1-m deep layer is

1. 4 Flexural Strenght of Concrete

based on table below

Load Repetition factor, k2

The value of f'cf = 0.7 (fc')0.5

( based on RTA - NSW 1993)

x 3.96 = 2.138 MPa

assumed Fc' = ### Mpa

Concrete Thickness Due to INTERIOR Loading

using table below

for Fc' = 32MPa

(Chart 1.4.1 Correlation between short-term Youngs E ss and FE1)

for Es = ### Mpa

Using Chart 1.4.2

(Chart 1.4.2 Correlation between Wheel spacing and FS1)

(Chart 1.4.3 Correlation between depth soil layer and FS 1)

1.2 (for internal loading)

so, F1 = Fall FE1 FH1 FS1 k3 k4

From chart 1.4.4

(Chart 1.4.4 Slab Thickness and F1)

Concrete Thickness Due to Edge Loading

Using Chart 1.5.1

(Chart 1.5.1 Correlation between short-term Youngs E ss and FE2)

Using Chart 1.5.2

(Chart 1.5.2 Correlation between Wheel spacing and FS2)

Using Chart 1.5.3

(Chart 1.5.3 Correlation between depth soil layer and FS 1)

1.05 (for internal loading)

so, F2 = Fall FE2 FH2 FS2 k3 k4

From chart 1.5.4.

(Chart 1.5.4 Slab Thickness and F 2)

Reinforcement for internal Slab

B. Minimum tensile strength base on As 3600-2001 cl.9.1.1

C. Reinforcement in secondary direction in unrestrained slabs

So, Use N16-300

Southern Regional Water Pipeline (SRWP) Project

Base Plate Design (SHS Column) - Pinned Type Connection

2. Check bolt capacity

checking combined shear and tension per bolt:

3. Check the plate capacity for axial tension in the column

(See AISC connection manual [2] clause 4.12.4)

5. Check the plate capacity for axial compression in the column

Southern Regional Water Pipeline (SRWP) Project