CREW: Department of Defense: Department of The Air Force: Regarding Perchlorate: Scanned Perchlorate October 2008 HH

......... - ........
Ercole L. Cavalieri. Director

986805 Nebraska Medical Center
University
Omaha. NE 68198-6805
"-._..- of Nebraska
eC<lvalic@unmc.edu
The liniversily of Nebraska
(402) 559-8924
Center for Environmental Toxicology
Fu}(: (402) 559-8068
Promoting the integration o/new perspectivell
and insightll into education and research
June 12, 2003
Dr. Julie Louise Gerberding. M.D., M.P.H.

Director. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and
Administrator, Agency for Toxic Substances Disease Registry
1600 Clifton Rd., NE (E-28) Fax: (404) 498-0094
Atlanta, GA 30333 Total # of pages: 2
RE: UNMC PERCHLORATE STATE OF THE SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM (PS 3)
Dear Dr. Gerberding:
The Center for Environmental Toxicology and the Department of Pharmacology at the University of Nebraska
Medical Center is sponsoring the 2003 Perchlorate State-of-the-Science Symposium (PS 3 2003). The purpose
of PS3 2003 is to present the most recent scholarly and professional scientific work on this important subject I
am writing to ask your organization to provide financial support. 1n addition to UNMC. the Society for Risk
Analysis and the National Ground Water Association have agreed to serve as co-sponsors. Our goal is for the
symposium to take place this year in Omaha, NE or its environs.
Perchlorate has been found in drinking water throughout the United Scates. Currently, there is great concern
that it may be present at levels that cause adverse effects to human health. A number of perchlorate related
animal and human studies have been conducted. However, there is great debate and controversy regarding the
most critical effects. The University of Nebraska intends this conference to showcase to the public, scientists.
and State and Federal regulatory officials expert knowledge and cutting-edge research on these issues.
The PS3 2003 will be held for scientists, consultants, regulatory agency officials, and others interested· in
learning the latest about perchlorate first hand from the scientists who perfonned and published the most
recent scientific research. PS 3 2003 will provide a review of several fundamental science issues related to the
likelihood and magnitude of health risks posed by perchlorate. We will bring together independent
distinguished scientists who will provide their infonned insights on these subjects and help craft consensus
reports on the state-of-the-science as of 2003. PS3 2003 will devote a half-day to each of the following major
scientific topics:
• What effects of perchlorate exposure are genuinely adverse, at what dose orex.posure level, and to
whom?
• Are animal or human data scientifically preferable for estimating these effects and risks?
• What do the data from the neurodevelopmental rat brain morphometry studies mean?
• How should the developmental animal behavior studies be interpreted for purposes of ri sk assessment?
University of Nebraska---4..incoln Univershyof Nebraska Medical Celller University of Nebraska at Omaha University of Nebraska at Kearney
In addition, luncheon and dinner presentations will address other timely questions:
• What are the sources of perchlorate in the environment?
• What are the scope, scale, and causes of iodine deficiency in the U.S.?
• What is the relative magnitude of anti-thyroid effect from environmental exposure to perchlorate
compared with dietary exposure to nitrate?
Each module is structured to facilitate a common goal for PS 3 2003:
• Provide an opportunity for leading experts in each relevant field to evaluate the new science and
explain h~w it alters the state of scientific knowledge
• Provide an opportunity for scientists, consultants, regulatory agency officials, and others from all over
the country to learn first hand about the latest scientific work and directly engage in query and
discussion with both the researchers who performed these new studies and invited experts
• Develop, among the invited experts, a shared understanding and exposition of the state-of-the·science
as of 2003.
'several independent invited experts will make up the panel for each module. Experts will consist of scientists
and physicians in the following specialties:
• Biostatistics and mathematics • Physiology
• Pharmacokinetics • Brain morphology
• Epidemiology • Endocrine disruption
• Toxicology • Experimental therapeutics
• Endocrinology • Risk Assessment
• Neurology • Biochemistry
Invited experts will be charged with producing concise, written, consensus documents for each module. These
wriltt=n conclusions will provide the latest word on the science of perchlorate to educate attendees, regulators,
and the public with clear scientific advice on perchlorate.
Sponsorship provides your organization recognition in support of a blue ribbon expert panel to establish the
state of the science on an issue of interest to you and of significant importance to the public. Agencies that
support PS3 2003 will have the opportunity to have their logo on event annO\lJ1cements, meeting materials, and
will be provided a number of complimentary registrations. Also, we would strongly encourage sponsors to
promote attendance by alerting State and Federal officials working on perchlorate and others who may have an
interest in participating.
Your sponsorship will allow for a first-of-its-kind event that provides a look at the views of the world's
experts on the key issues surrounding perchlorate. With so many new studies on perchlorate emerging in the
past year, it is hard to stay abreast of the newest developments and analysis. Participating in PS3 2003
provides a quick, in-depth immersion into the scientific issues. Perhaps more importantly, it will provide State
regulatory officials a first-hand opportunity to learn from leading experts and interact with the scientists who
performed the research that will form the scientific foundation for future regulatory decisions.
Your sponsorship of this important event is needed to make it a success. Please reply at your earliest
convenience. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me.
Sincerely,
li~ f~£~~.sc
Professor and Director
.;":::>:~ft;i<
:';;::
Ercole ·L. Cavalieri. Directo~

Omaha, NE 68198·6805
ecavalic@unmc.edu
of
The University Nebraska
(402) 559·8924
"Center for Environmental Toxicology Fax.: (402) 559-8068
. Premoting the integration of new perspectives
. 4mtinsighJs inJo education and research
MlIY 20, 2003
.Mr. Raymond DuBois

Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Installations & Environment
Department of Defense
3400 Defense Pentagon,
Room3B792 Fax: (703)~93-70Il
Washington, DC 20310-3400 #ofpages: 2:
RE: UNMC PERCHLORAlE STATE OFTIiE SCltlNCC SYMPOSIUM (pS3)
Dear Mr. DuBois:
The' .Center for Environmental Toxicology and the Department of Pharmacology at the Uni versity of Nebraska
Medical Ceriteris sponsoi;ng the 2003 Perchlorate Staterof-the-Science Symposium (pS~ 200;3). The purpose
,Of.PS3 2003is to prese.ntthe most reCent scholarly ll'lld professionll.1 scientific work on this important subject. I
aP,I.w.rlting raask your organization to provide fmancial support. In addition to UNMC, the Society for Risk
Analysis and the National Ground Water Association have agreed to Ilerve as eo-sponsors. Our'goal is for the
sympo:siwu to take place this year in Omaha, NE or its environs. . .
Perchlorate. has been found in drinking water throughout the United States. Currently, there is great concern
that it may he present at levels that cause.advers~ effects to human health. A number of perchlorate related
of
mos.tcritical effects..The l,JniverSity Nebraska intends this conference to showcase to the public, scientists,
The PS 3 -2003 will be held for scientists, consultallts. regulatory agency officials, and others interested in
learning the' latest about perchlorate first hand from the scientists who perfc:mned and published the most
recent scientific research. Ps' 2003 will proyidc II review of severnl fundamental science i~sues related to the
likelihood and magnitude of health risks posed by perchlorate: We will bring together independe~t
q.istinguished -scientists who willprovide their infonned insights on these subjects and help craft consensus
'repol1S On the state-of-tl:te-soience as of2003. PS3 2003 will devote a half-day to each of the foHowing major
s~ientific topics: .
• What effects ofperchlorate exposure are genuinely adverse, at what dose or exposure level, and to
whom?
.. Are animal or human data scientifically preferable for e'snmating these effects and risks? I
• What do the data from the neurodevelopmentill rat brain morphometry studies mean?
• How should the developmental animal behavior studies be interpreted for pUJposes of risk assessment?
University of Nebraska-Lincoln University of Nebraska Meqical Center Universily Of Nebraska al Omaha Unlversily of Nebraska al Keamey
1 ••••••
.' If! addition, luncheon and dinner presentations will address other timely questions:
• What are the scope, scale, and causes of iodine deficiency in theU.S.7
compared with dietary exposure to nitr'li.te? '
Each module is structured to facilitate a common goal for PS3 2003:
• Provide an' opportunity for leading experts in each relevant field to evaluate the new science and
explain hoW it alters the state of scientific knowledge
• Provide:an opportunity for scientists, consUltantS, regulatory agency officials, and others from allover'
the country to leam firsthand about the latest scientific work and directly engage in query and
.' Develop, among the invited experts, a shared understanding and exposi~on of thestate-of~the-science
as of~003.
Soveral independe~t invited experts will make up the panel for each module. Experts will consist of scientists
.' Pharmaeokinetic::s • Brain 1l101'phology

• , Neurology • Biochemistry
Invited expert:~ will be charged with producing cona.ise, wri~n, consensus documents for each module. These
written conclusions'wilI provide the latest word on the science of percli,lorate to e(1ucate a!lendees, regulatOrS,
,and the pul,)li~ with clear. scientific advice on perchlorate.
spOnsorsb,1p.prbvidcs your organization recognition in support of a hlue ribbon expert panel to es~blil:h,the
of
state ~he: science on an issue of interest to you and of significant importance to the public. AgenCies that
support PS3 2003 will have the opportunity to have their logo on event announcements, meeting materials, and
will be provided a nUJ:1iber of complimentary registrations., Also. we Would strongly encourage sponsors to
promote attendance by alerting State and F~ officials worlcing on perchlorate arid others who may have an
Your sponsorship will allow for a first-of-its-kind event that provides a look at the Views ot· the world' s
exper:ts on the key, issues surrounding perchlorate. With so many new studies on, perchlorate emerging in tile
past year, it is hard to stay abreast of the newest developments and analysis. Participating in PS 3 2003
provides a quick, in-depth imniersion into the scientific issues. Perhaps more importantly, iL will pwvidc StAte,
regulatory officials a first-band opportunity. to learn from leading experts and interact with the scientists who
performed the research that will fonn the scientific foundation for future regulatory decisions.
Sincerely,
/lJ.l-L
Ercole L. Cavalieri, D.Sc.
~ University 98680S Nebraska Medical 'Center
~ of Nebraska
Omaha. NE 68198-6805
The University of Nebraska ecavalie@unmc.edu

(402) 559-8924
Fax: (402) 559-8068
Promoting the integration of new perspectives
and insights into education and research
May 20. 2003
Dr. Paul Gilman

Assistant Administrator, Office of Research and Development
U.S, Environmental Protection Agency
1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW Fax: (202)-565-2430
Washington. DC 20460 No. of pages: 2
Dear Dr. Gilman:
of PS 3 2003 is to present the mostrecent scholarly and professional scientific work on this important subject. I
am writing to ask your organization to provide financial support. In addition to UNMC, the Society for Risk
symposium to take place this year in Omaha. NE or its environs.
Perchlorate has been found in drinking water throughout the United States. Currently. there is great concern
and State and Federal regulatory officials expert knowledge and cuning-edge research on these issues.
The PS~ 2003 will be held for scientists, consultants. regulatory agency officials, and others interested in
learning the latest about perchlorate first hand from the scientists who performed and published the most
recent scientific research. PS3 2003 will provide a review of several fundamental science issues related to the
distinguished scientists who will provide their informed insights on these subjects and help craft consensus
scientific topics:
• What effects of perchlorate exposure are genuinely adverse, at what dose or exposure level, and to
whom?
• Are animal or human data scientifically preferable for estimating these effectS and risks?
• What do the data from the neurodeve]opmental rat brain morphometry studies mean'?
• How should the developmental animal behavior studies be interpreted for purposes of risk assessment?
UniverSity of Nebraska-Lincoln University of Nebraska Medical Center University of NebraSka at Omaha University of Nebraska at Kearney
explain how it alters the state of scientific knowledge
discussion with both the researchers who performl"d these new studies and invited experts
• Develop, among the invited experts, a shared understanding and exposition of the state-of-the-science
as of 2003.
Several independent invited experts will make up the panel for each module. Experts will consist of scientists
and physicians in the following specialties: •
written conclusions will provide the latest word on the science of perchlorate to educate attendees, regulators,
support PS 3 2003 will have the opportunity to have their logo on event announcements, meeting materials, and
experts on the key issues surround!ng perchlorate. With so many new studies on perchlorate emerging in the
provides a quick. in-depth immersion into the scientific issues. Perhaps more importantly, it will provide State
Sincerely,
" L! .
t
I
,/ . / I
' • l
/ "\.'-1' t-'tV,Vvl t
/ rcole L. Cavalieri, D.Sc.
Ercole L. Cavalieri. DIrector
University Omaha. NE 68198·6805
of Nebraska
The University of Nebraska ecuvalie@unmc.edu

(402) 559-8924
Fax: (402) 559·8068
Promoting the integration oj new perspectives
May 20,2003
Mark B. McClellan, M.D., Ph.D.

Commissioner of Food and Drugs
U.S. Food and Drug Administration
5600 Fishers Lane Fax: (301 )-827-5340
Rockville MD 20857-0001 No. of pages: 2
Dear Dr. McClellan:
The Center for Environmental Tox'icology and the Department of Phannacology at the University of Nebraska
Medical Center is sponsoring the 2003 Perchlorate State-of-the-Science Symposium (PS3 2003). The purpose
ofPS 3 2003 is to present the most recent scholarly and professional scientific work on this important subject. I
Perchlorate has been found in drinking water throughout the United States. Currently, there is great concern
most critical effects. The University of Nebraska intends this conference to showcase to the public. scientists.
The pS3 2003 will be held for scientists, consultants, regulatory agency officials, and others interested in
learning the latest about perchlorate first hand from the scientists who perfonned and published the most .
likelihood and magnitude of health risks posed by perchlorate. We will bring together independenL
distinguished scientists who will provide their infonned insights on these subjects and help craft consensus
reports on the state-of-the-science 'as of 2003. PS3 2003 will devote a half-day to each .of the following major
scientific topics:
• What effects of perchlorate exposure are genuinely adverse. at what dose or exposure level. and to
whom?
University of Nebraska-Lincoln University of Nebraska Medical Center University of Nebraska at Omaha University of Nebraska at Kearney
•
Provide an opportunity for leading experts in each relevant field to evaluate the new science and
• Provide an opportunity for scientists. consultants. regulatory agency officials, and others from all over
the country-to learn first hand about the latest scientific work and directly engage in query and
discussion with both the researchers who perfonned these new studies and invited experts
• Develop, among the invited experts, a shared understanding and exposition of the state~of-the-science
as of 2003.
Invited experts will be charged with producing concise. written, consensus documents for each module. These
support PS 3 2003 will have the opportunity to have their logo on event announcements, meeting materials, and
will be provided a number of complimentary registrations. Also. we would strongly encourage sponsors to
provides a quick. in-depth immersion into the scientific issues. Perhaps more importantly, it will provide State
perfonned the research that will fonn the scientific foundation for future regulatory decisions.
Sincerely,
/. ,/ I.
A~.1 jAd~'iAC

986805 Nebr:lska Medical Center
University Omaha, NE 68198-6805
of Nebraska

(402) 559-8924
Fax: (402) 559-8068
Promoting the integration of new perspectives
May 20,2003
Dr. Richard Williams

Chief Health & Medical Officer
Mail Code AM
300 E Street, SW
NASA Headquarters • Fax: (202)-358-3349
Washington DC 20546-000 I No. of pages: 2
Dear Dr. Williams:
of PS 3 2003 is to present the most recent scholarly and professional scientific work on this important" subject. I
symposium to take place this year in Omaha. NE or its environs.
Perchlorate has been found in drinking water throughout the United States. Currently. there is great concern
animal and human studies have been conducted. However. there is great debate and controversy regarding the
The PS 3 2003 will be held for scientists. consultants, regulatory agency officials, and others interested in
recent scientific research. PS3 2003 will provide a review of several fundamental science issues related to the
scientific topics:
• What effects of perchlorate exposure are genuinely adverse, at what dose or exposure level. and to
whom?
University of Nebraska-Uncoln University of Nebraska Medical Center University of Nebraska at Omaha University of Nebraska at Kearney
In addition. luncheon and dinner presentations will address other timely questions:
• Provide an opportunity for scientists. consultants. regulatory agency officials. and others from all over
• Develop. among the invited experts, a shared understanding and exposition of the state-of-the-science
as of 2003.
• Phannacokinetics • Brain morphology
written conclusions will provide the latest word on the science of perchlorate to educate attendees. regulators.
support PSJ 2003 will have the opportunity to have their logo on event announcements, meeting materials. and
past year. it is hard to stay abreast of the newest developments and analysis. Participating in PS 3 2003
provides a quick, in-depth immersion into the scientific issues. Perhaps more importantly. it will provide State
convenience. If you have any questions. please do not hesitate to call me.
Sincerely,
~
/
.' I / / .
V~" vb'1M
Ecole L. ~lieri, D.Sc.
~ University 986805 Nebraska Medical Center
~
Omaha, NE 68198-6805
of Nebraska

(402) 559-8924
Fax: (402) 559-8068
Promoting the integration o/new perspectives
May 20, 2003
Ms. Maureen Koetz

Deputy Assistant Secretary Environment, Safety. and Occupational Health
U.S. Air Force
SAFIIEE
1665 AF Pentagon
Suite 5C866 Fax: (703)-614-2884
Washington, DC 20330-1665 No. of pages: 2
RE: UNMC PERCHLORATESTA1'EOFTHE SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM (PS 3 )
Dear Ms. Koetz:
of PS3 2003 is to present the most recent scholarly and professional scientific work on this important subject. I
The PS3 2003 will be held for scientists. consultants, regulatory agency officials, and others interested in
learning the latest about perchlorate first hand from the scientists who perfonned and published the most
reports on the state-of-the-science as of 2003. PS 3 2003 will devote a half-day to each of the following major
scientific topics:
• What effects of perchlorate exposure are genuinely adverse. at what dose or exposure level. and to
whom?
University of Nebraska-Lincoln University of Nebraska Medical Center University of Nebraska at Omaha University of Nebraska at Kearney
as of2D03.
and physicians in the following specialties: .
• Phannacokinetics • Brain morphology
support PS3 2003 will have the opportunity to have their logo on event announcements, meeting materials, and
Your sponsorship will allow for a tirst-of-its-kind event that provides a look at the views of the world's
past year, it is hard to stay abreast of the newest developments and analysis. Participating in PS3 2003
perfonned the research that will fonn the scientific foundation for future regulatory decisions.
Sincerely.
j.1tj~

.,
986805 Nebra~ka Medical Center
University Omaha. NE 68198-6805
of Nebraska
eCllvlllie@unmc.<:du
The University of Nebraska
(402) 559-8924
fax: (402) 559-8068
Promoting the integration ofnew perspectives
June 12,2003
Dr. Christopher T. De Rosa

Director, Division of Toxicology
Agency for Toxic Substances Disease Registry
1600 Clifton Rd., NE (E-29) Fax: (404) 498-0094
Atlanta. GA 30333 Total # of pages: 2
RE: UNMC PERCHLORATE STATE OF THE SClENCESYMPOSIUM (PS3)
Dear Dr. De Rosa:
The Center for Environmental Toxicology and the Department of Phannacology at the University of Nebraska
:v1edical Center is sponsoring the 2003 Perchlorate State-of-the-Science Symposium (PS 3 2003). The purpose
of PS3 2003 is to present the most recent scholarly and professional scientific work on this important subject. I
most critical effects. The University of Nebraska intends this conference to showcase to the public, scientists,
The PS3 2003 will be held for scientists. consultants, regulatory agency officials, and others interested in
recent scientific research. PS] 2003 win provide a review of several fundamental science issues related to the
reports on the state-of-the-science as of 2003. PS 3 2003 will devote a half-day to each of the following major
scientific topics:
• What effects of perchlorate exposure are genuinely adverse, at what dose or exposure level, and to
whom?
University 01 Nebraska-i..incotn University 01 Nebraska Medical Center Univershy of Nebraska at Omaha University of Nebraska at Kearney
in addition, luncheon and dinner presentations will address other timely questions:
• What are the scope. scale. and causes of iodine deficiency in the U.S.?
Each module is structured to facilitate a common goal for PS3 2003:
• Provide an opportunity for scientists. consultants. regulatory agency officials, and others from all over
the country to learn [ITst hand about the latest scientific work and directly engage in query and
as of 2003.
5tatc of the science on an issue of interest to you and of significant importance to the public. Agencies that
support PSJ 2003 will have the opportunity to have their logo on event announcements, meeting materials, and
will be provided a number of complimentary registrations. Also. we would strongly encourage sponsors to
Your sponsorship will allow for a first~of-its-kind event that provides a look at the views of the world's
past year, it is hard to stay abreast of the newest developments and analysis. Participating in PS J 2003
performed the research that will fonn the scientific foundation for future regulatory decisions.
convenience. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to ca)) me.
Sincerely, /
JJ,L~L
Ercole L. Cavalieri. D.Sc.
4
PAGES
REMOVED
:;;;9
20 May 2003 Draft

DoD ~itp.~ ;:It Adivp. ~
Cor:nponent Facility Name City Slate Test SitelSource Sampled Detected Comments
Air Force AmoldAFB Tullahoma TN yes Sed
Air Force Beale AFB Marysville CA yes GW
Air Force Buckley AFB Aurora CO no
!
Air Force Cannon AFB Clovis NM yes DW State requirement;
March 1999 detects
Air Force Cape CodAFS SandWich MA yes ND
Air Force Davis Monthan AFB Tucson AZ \

yes Soil Source - Explosives,
(unconfirmed) Propellant Disposal,
state provisional cleanup
level
Air Force ' Duluth, Reserve Center Duluth MN yes ND
Air Force EdWardsAFB EdWards CA Jet Propulsion lab, yes GW,soil Source - Rocket
North Base Research
Air Force Ellsworth AFB Rapid City SD yes ND GWsampled
Air Force FE Warren AFB Cheyenne WY no
Air Force HiIIAFlji Ogden VT yes Soil,GW,DW
Air Force HoliomanAFB Gallup NM yes GW,SW, Source - Rocket Testing

soil/sediment
Air Force KirtlandAFB AlbUQuerQue NM ves ND
Air Force lackland AFB San Antonio TX ves Not reported
Air Force lanolev AFB Hamoton VA yes Not reported
Air Force McConnel AFB Wichita KS yes ND Titan Sites - GW, soil
sampled
Air Force Melrose Air Force Range Melrose NM yes DW Source - Explosives
Air Force MoodyAFB Valdosta GA no
Mountain Home AFB ID no
Air Force New Boston AFS Manchester, MA yes ND

NH
OffuttAFB NE no
Air Force OnizukaAFS Sunnyvale CA yes DW-nol Awaiting results of

reoorted samolino
Air Force PatrickAFB Cocoa Beach Fl yes ND
Air Force Plant 4 Forth Worth TX ves NO

Air Force Plant 42 Palmdale CA yes ND
Air Force Plant 44 Tucson AZ ves ND

Air Faroe Planl PJKS Waterton CO yes ND
Air Force Poinsett Range ShawAFB SC yes GW
Air Force Randoloh AFB San Antonio TX no

Air Force Sheppard AFB Witchita Falls TX yes Not reported
Air Force TinkerAFB Oklahoma Cily OK no

Sed - sediment SW - surface water
GW - groundwater Air Force TravisAFB Fairfield CA ves Notreoorted ND - non detect
DW - drinking waler 1cf4 OB/OD - open bum/ open detonation
20 May 2003 Draft
Component
Facility Name
nnn
City
~it..... :ot A, -li\l..
State Test Site/Source Sampled

v
Detected Comments
Air Force Vandenberg AFB Lompoc CA yes Soil
Air Force Westover AFB Chicopee MA no
Air Force Wright-Patterson AFB Dayton OH yes NO
Anny Aberdeen Proving Ground Aberdeen MD COA drinking water yes DW State has issued health
advisory for the City of
Aberdeen of 1ppb
perchlorate in drinking
water. Slate h~ issued
a Draft Administrative
Order to the APG to
monitor, evaluate, and
cleanup perchlorate
, contamination. APG has
ceased training wi
perchlorate containing
munitions in the affected
area.
Anny Aberdeen Proving Ground Aberdeen MD COA well field yes GW See above.
Anny Aberdeen Proving Ground Aberdeen MD COAweils yes GW See above.
Anny Aberdeen Proving Ground Aberdeen MD Harford drinking yes DW See. above.
water
Anny Aberdeen Proving Ground Aberdeen MD Harford well field no See above.
Anny Aberdeen Proving Ground Aberdeen MD Harford wells yes GW See above.
Anny Badger Anny Ammunition Baraboo WI yes NO state requested

Plant samnlinn
Anny Camp Bullis San Antonio TX OB/OD area yes GW Sampled in 2001 & 2002
due to request from state
regulators
Army Camp Navajo Bellemont AZ. Detonation Pits yes GW
Anny Dugway Proving Ground Dugway UT no Dugway is preparing a

proposal for perchlorate
assessment.
Annv Fort Meade Odenton MD OB/OD areas ves GW

Anny Lake City Anny Independence MO yes GW
Ammunition Plant
Anny Lone Star Army Texarkana TX Burning Ground yes GW
Ammunition Plant
Anny Lone Star Anny Texarkana TX Production Bldg yes Soil
Ammunition Plant
Anny Longhorn Anny Karnack TX yes Soil,GW, SW LHMP is being used to

Aummition Plant test and study different
perchlora1e cleanup
technologies as well as
being used to study
ecological effects of
perchlorate. Source
Propellant Handling

GW - groundwater ND - non detect
DW - drinking water 20f 4 OB/OD - open buml open detonation
20 May 2003 Draft
non Sitp!': ::It AI ~tivp
i)
Component
Facility Name City State Test Site/Source Sampled Detected Comments
Anny Massachusetts Military Falmouth MA MMR OBIOD areas yes GW EPA Region 1 has
Reservation directed a screening
level of 1.5 ppb and a
cleanup level of 4
ppbMassachusetts
Department of
Environmental
Protection (MOEP) has
issued a health advisory
of 1 ppb in dri')king
water for the Towne of
Bourne. Towne of
Bourne have been shut
down and USACE has
built a pipeline
\ connecting Boume with
a regional water supply.
Army Massachusetts Mimary Falmouth MA Bourne water supply yes OW See above.
Reservation wells
Army Massachusetts Military Falmouth MA Gallow Skating Rink yes GW See above.
Reservation
Army Massachusetts Military Falmouth MA MMR Impact areas yes GW See above.
Reservation
Army Massachusetts Military Falmouth MA MMR Testing ranges yes GW See above.
Reservation
Army Massachusetts Military Falmouth MA MMR Training yes GW See above.
Reservation rannes
Army Massachusetts Military Falmouth MA yes GW Source - OB/OO. See
Reservation above.
Army McAlester Army McAlester OK Brown Lake yes SW State and EPA Region 6
Ammun~ion Plant directed sampling of
adjacent lakes using
RCRA 3004 authority.
No sampling yet
conducted at the OBIOO
pending agreement
between state and EPA
Region 6
Army McAlester Army McAlester OK OBIOO areas no See above.

Ammunition Plant
Army McAlester Army McAlester OK Rocket Lake yes SW See above.
Ammunition Plant
Army Red River Army Depot Texarkana TX OBIOO areas yes SW State requires quarterly
sampling of OBIOO
sites.State has added
perchlorate to RRAO's
TPOES permil.State has
asked RRAD to develop
a Pollution Prevention
Control Plan (PPCP) to
address perchlorate.
Army Red River Army Depot Texarkana TX Sanitary Sewage yes Soil,GW See above
Plant
Army Red River Army Depot Texarkana TX yes GW Source - Propellant
Handlino. See above.
Army Redstone Arsenal Huntsville AL yes GW There are two known
plumes of perchlorate
Currently no drinking
water sources are
threatened but the
plumes are moving off-
site.
GW - groundwater NO - non detect
OW - drinking water 3of4 OBIOO - open buml open detonallon
20 May 2003 Draft
nnn ~it..c:. at Adive
Component Facility Name City State Test Site/Source Sampled Detected Comments
Army Seneca Army Depot Romulus NY no Seneca Army Depot has

been directed by
regulators to assess for
perchlorate Seneca is
evaluating the request
no action as of vel.
Army 'Mltte Sands Missile Las Cruces NM yes Soil Source - Rocket Tesling
Ranoe
DOE Los Alamos National Lab Los Alamos NM yes GW,DW Source - DoE Lab
Chemicals
Navy Brunswick NAS Brunswick ME EOD Range yes Not reported
,
Navy China Lake China Lake CA Test and Training yes yes
Ranoe
Navv Concord Concord CA no
Navy Corona Corona CA \
yes Not reported
Navy Crane Crane IN yes Not reported
Navy Dahlgren Dahlgren VA no
Navy Indian Head Indian Head MD propellant handling yes GW,SW
Navy Lualualei, Rocket Test Lualualei HI yes no

Facility
Navy McGregor Naval McGregor TX propellant handling yes Soil,GW,SW Closed
Weaoons Plant
Navy Nomans Island MA bombing range yes Not reported Transferred
Navy San Nicholas Island Ventura CA EODRange yes GW

Countv
Naw Seal Beach Seal Beach CA ves Not rennrted
Navy? Nlegheny Ballistics Lab Rocket Center 'IN yes GW Source - Rocket
Research Production

GW - groundwater ND - non delect
OW - drinking water 4of4 OB/OD - open burnJ open detonahon
" -. -- - - ._-~--- ---~ .. _----
338
PAGES
REMOVED
33~
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT
OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20503
May 20,2003
(Senate)
STATEMENT OF ADMINISTRATION POLICY

(THIS STATEMENT HAS BEEN COORDINATED BY OMB WITH THE CONCERNED AGENCIES.)
. S. 1050 - National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2004
(Senator Warner (R) VA)
The Administration appreciates the Senate Armed Services Committee's continued support of our
national defense. The Committee-reported bill includes, for example, endorsement of the President's
requested military pay raise and other benefits critical to maintaining the high quality and morale of
America's anned forces, continuance with needed flexibility ofthe Cooperative Threat Reduction
program, and support for criti~al research and development fur low-yield nuclear weapons. It is
essential to undertake the research needed to evaluate a range of U.S. options that may prove essential
in deterring or neutralizing future threats. The Administration welcomes section 322, which addresses
readiness issues associated with the Endallgered Species Act, but urges support for the remaining
provisions in the Readiness and Range Preservation Initiative, which are intended to ensure that the men
and women of our Armed Forces receive the training they need to succeed when put in hanns way.
The Administration looks forward to working with the Congress to address the priorities set forth in the
"Defense Transformation for the 21st Century Act" in the [mal defense authorization bill that is presented
to the President.
The Administration would oppose any amendments to change the base realignment and closures
(BRAC) authority passed by the Congress two years ago and if any such amendment should be
included in the final legislation, the Secretary of Defense, joining with other senior advisors, would
recommend that the President veto the bill.
The Administration has a number of other concerns with the bill, including those described below. The
Administration looks forward to working with the Congress on these and other issues as the bill moves
through the legislative process.
• Missile Defense. The Administration appreciates the bill's full funding of missile defense
programs and sections 221-223, which eliminate statutory restrictions to the program element
structure and authorize the use ofResearch, Development, Testing, and Evaluation (RDT&E)
funding to support development and fielding of initial ballistic missile defense capabilities. The
Administration believes, however, that giving responsibility for RDT&E for the Patriot
Advanced Capability - 3 (PAC-3) and Medium Extended Air Defense System (MEADS)
programs to the Missile Defense Agency (MDA) would detract from MDA's primary
responsibility ofballistic missile defense and would impede progress in PAC-3 and MEADS,
particularly for their roles in air defense. That latter responsibility should go to the Department
ofthe Army.
• Train and Equip. The bill does not include section 441, Support of Foreign Nations
Committed to Combating Global Terrorism, of the Administration's proposed Defense
Transformation Act. This authority would allow the Department ofDefense (DoD) flexibility
to provide time-sensitive military support to key cooperating nations that are assisting in the
global war on terrorism It would allow DOD to provide training and equipment expeditiously
and-efficiently in response to unanticipated, no-notice requirements that the global war on
terrorism may generate.
• Continuity ofOperations. The Administration urges the inclusion ofthe requested authority to
facilitate the relocation of DoD's command and control leadership. This authority would
enable the Secretary of Defense to: (1) designate other facilities as part ofthe Pentagon
Reservation, and (2) manage and maintain relocation facilities, particularly the primary
alternate relocation facility, as turn-key alternatives ready as fully operational alternatives
without warning.
• Overseas Basing Commission The Administration opposes the provision to establish a

commission to review DoD's overseas presence. Establishing this commission is not
necessary. The Department has accelerated its ongoing review to adjust the global positioning
of forces and supporting infrastructure and plans to inform Congress of its recommendations.
• F-22. The Administration opposes the bill's production cut of two F-22 aircraft. Restrictions
on production quantities would undermine the program's buy-to-budget strategy, through
which the Air Force will acquire as many aircraft as it can within the program's cap on total
funding.
• Space Launch Capability. The Administration strongly objects to language in Section 913
that would require two space launch vehicles or families of space launch vehicles for all
national security payloads. The requirement to make every national security payload dual
compatible with two. families of launch vehicles would be problematic and could seriously
delay or curtail many critical national security payloads at higIt taxpayer costs. The Secretary
ofDefense and Director ofCentrallntelligence should have the ability, consistent with
National Space Policy, to waive the dual compatibility requirement on selected national
security payloads, based on unique or extenuating requirements.
• Limitations, Restriction, Flexibility Issues. The bill includes provisions that would add more
complexity and impose limitations on lliD's management structure, including sections 231
234 and section 211, which would prohibit the transfer ofseveral programs outside the Office
of the Secretary of Defense (OSD). Transfer ofthese programs would improve management
efficiency and allow OSD to focus on providing oversight and strategic guidance to the entire
Department.
• Indemnification - Counterterrorism Technology. The Administration strongly opposes section

851, which would authorize the Federal government to provide unlimited indemnification to
companies that sell counterterrorism technology to State and local government agencies and
could make the government liable for excessive costs that cannot be reasonably estimated or
controlled. The Support Anti-terrorism by Fostering Effective Technologies Act of2002
already provides critical incentives for the development and deployment of anti-terrorism
technologies to State and local governments by providing liability protections for sellers of
qualified anti-terrorism technologies.
• Perchlorate Study. While Administration supports the intent of section 331(b), which requires
a review ofthe effects of perchlorate on the endocrine system, we are concerned that this
section would unnecessarily duplicate an ongoing National Academy of Sciences study
(initiated in March 2003) being undertaken pursuant to the request ofthe Federal Interagency
Working Group on Perchlorate.
• Special Pay and Benefits. The Administration is concerned that a number of unsought special
pay and benefit authorities, including sections 604, 606, 615, 616, and 643, divert resources
unnecessarily. These mandatory authorities would undermine each Service's determination of
whether such -additional benefits are warranted and appropriate. Specifically, section 616
(Assignment Incentive Pay for Service in Korea), Assignment Incentive Pay authority enacted
in last year's Defense Authorization bill,a lready authorizes Service Secretaries discretion to
award such pay as necessary, thus obviating the need for any additional authority.
• Berry Amendment. The Administration is concerned that section 831, dealing with
exceptions to the Berry Amendment, should be modified to ensure that textile products are
appropriately covered consistent with the Administration's request.
'.
• Public-private competitions. The Administration strongly supports clear statutory authority for
the Department's use of best value source selections in public-private competitions, but
opposes caveats in ~ection 812 that would sunset the authority, preclude its application to
needs other than information technology, or sanction timefulmes for conducting competitions
that conflict with tlnse established in OMB Circular A-76.
******
t
DR 1588 EASIPP
SEC. 331. PUBLIC HEALTH ASSESSMENT OF EXPOSURE TO
PERCHLORATE. 21
(a) EPIDEMIOLOGICAL STUDY OF EXPOSURE TO PER- 22
CHLORATE.- 23
t
79
DR 1588 EASIPP
(1) IN GENERAL.-The Secretary of Defense shall 1
provide for an independent epidemiological study of 2
exposure to perchlorate in drinking water. 3
(2) PERFORMANCE OF STUDY.-The Secretary 4
shall provide for the performance of the study under 5
this subsection through the Centers for Disease Con- 6
trol, the National Institutes of Health, or another 7
Federal entity with experience in environmental toxi- 8
cology selected by t~e Secretary for purposes of the 9
study. 10
(3) MATTERS TO BE INCLUDED IN STUDY.-In 11
providing for the study under this subsection, the Sec- 12
retary shall require the Federal entity conducting the 13
study-14
(A) to assess the incidence of thyroid disease 15
and measurable effects of thyroid function in re- 16
lation to exposure to perchlorate; 17
(B) to ensure that the study is of sufficient 18
scope and scale to permit the making of mean- 19
ingful conclusions of the measurable public 20
health threat associated with exposure to per- 21
chlorate, especially the threat to sensitive sub- 22
populations; and 23,
(C) to study thyroid function, including 24
measurements of urinary iodine and thyroid 25
t
80
HR 1588 EASIPP
hormone levels, in a sufficient number of preg- 1
nant women, neonates, and infants exposed to 2
perchlorate in drinking water and match meas- 3
urements of perchlorate levels in the drinking 4
water of each study participant in order to per- 5
mit the development of meaningful conclusions 6
on the public health threat to individuals ex- 7
posed toperchlorate. 8
(4) REPORT ON STUDY.-The Secretary shall re- 9
quire the Federal entity conducting the study under 10
this subsection to submit to the Secretary a report on 11
the study not later than June 1, 2005. 12
(b) REVIEW OF EFFECTS OF PERCHLORA TE ON ENDO- 13
CRINE SYSTEM.- 14
(1) IN GENERAL-The Secretary shall provide 15
for an independent review of the effects of perchlorate 16
on the human endocrine system. 17
(2) PERFORMANCE OF REVIEW.-The Secretary 18
shall provide for the performance of the review under 19
this subsection through the Centers for Disease Con- 20
trol, the National Institutes of Health, or another ap- 21
propriate Federal research entity with experience in 22
human endocrinology selected by the Secretary for 23
purposes of the review. The Secretary shall ensure 24
t
81
HR 1588 EASIPP
that the panel conducting the review is composed of 1
individuals with expertise in human endocrinology. 2
(3) MATTERS TO BE INCLUDED IN REVIEW.-In 3
providing for the review under this subsection, the 4
Secretary shall require the Federal entity conducting 5
the review to assess- 6
(A) available data on human exposure to 7
perchlorate, including clinical data and data on 8
exposure of sensitive subpopulations, and the lev- 9
els at which health effects were observed; and 10
(B) available data on other substances that 11
have endocrine effects similar to perchlorate to 12
which the public is frequently exposed. 13
(4) REPORT ON REVIEW.-The Secretary shall 14
require the Federal entity conducting the review 15
under this subsection to submit to the Secretary a re- 16
port on the review not later than June 1, 2005. 17
PERCHLORATE
MESSAGE: DoD proactively addressing public health concern; fighting for "Credible
Decisions from Credible Science"
l
BACKGROUND
• Used since 50's in ordnance, propulsion; phannaceuticals, fertilizer, flares; fireworks
• Environment~ issue in the 90's due to lower detection capability
• 2001-03:
• EPA issued very conservative heal~ assessment that overstated risk;
• DoDINASNDoE objected - working with Administration to improve
analysis and the process.
• EPA agreed to National Academies of Science (NAS) review.
DISCUSSION: DoD addressing high-risk sites now but need to wait for NAS review
before making decisions regarding future use of perchlorate.
• Perchlorate (from DoD, Defense Industry, and Agriculture) likely in very low levels
in drinking water and .food throughout southwest US; may occur naturally.
• NAS review anticipated to be completed in 2004; EPA will then proceed with
standards development.
• DoD reliance on perchlorate - 15-25% of war reserve materiel
(munitions/ordnance); nearly all solid propulsion systems.
• Single manufacturer of perchlorate - Small Business: American Pacific

• DoD proactive investment> $30M
• Hwnan Health / Eco-Toxicity Studies(designed by EPA)
• Treatment &. Analytical Teclmology Development;
• DoD Survey to Detennine Contamination & High·Risk Sites ongoing
(current info will be provided to Hill by mid run 03)
• California legislative activity: effective ban on perchlorate use and handling
• US Congress legis1ative activity (Sen Boxer): Accelerate standards detennination
IMPACT:
Overstated risk affects DoD, NASA, and National Missile Defense
J
.. Encroachment: loss ofaccess & use of military lands; decreased realism in
training
• Weapons systems acquisitionIJogistics: $IO-$SOB to replace perchlorate

• Decreased ordnance/munitions/propulsion system safety ~
LEstimaU:d DoD cleanup costs> $15B without appreciable public health beuefit
r- -1
Ii • This amendment is wmecessary. \

l. 0 DoD is already conunitted to provide its 200 1 Survey data to EPA by the
end ofthis month - within two weeks.
o The scientific questions that exist concemina perchlorate are being
addressed by the National Academies of Science.
o DoD is already embarking on a nationwide prograni to obtain a better
database on perchlorate at its installations.
o EPA is already embarked on a nationwide process of determining the
extent and amount of perchlorate in drinking water systems.
o EPA is embarking on a regulatory process that will lead to appropriate
federal regulation of this substance.
o States are also embarking on regulatory responses
• Other aspects ofthis amendment are completely premature.

o It orders a nationwide survey of every possible public and private site,
irrespective ofthe quantity, the likelihood, ofits getting into the
environment, or the existence of any exposure pathway or human
receptors.
o It also orders DoD to undertake a program to Hmitigate" all such
contamination - again, irrespective of the risk it poses.
o And all these efforts are ordered before we have definitive science, in the
mid.st of ongoing state and federal regulatory processes. J
L • This proposRI makes the Alar scare look measured by comparison ,-J
Page 1 of 1
.3tt5
9/22/2005
.. .
Robert M. Lantis
Vice President & CTO
LightStream Technologies
12200 Sunrise Valley Drive
Reston, VA 20191 USA
703.480.2464 FAX- 703.480.2481
_ _.. Lanlis@LightStreamUV.com
LightStream
RE: Your enquiry ab CHLORATE REMEDIATION
Josh,
There is an abundance of information surrounding this large problem. Solid rocket fuel and
munitions -laden waters in the low (yet toxic) "parts per billion" (ppb) range are very difficult to
remediate with the simpler and more prevalent physical chemistry techniques. A review of the
literature clearly shows, however, that UV photochemistry has been proven an effective tool for
many of these problematic compounds (among many others). A key advantage with UV is that,
in sharp contrast to the problematic "exchange/entrapment/removal" physical chemistry
methods, which still require handling, storage, and disposal, the photolytic chemistry tool can
be a single-pass, instant, ana complete destruction of the hazardous compound, without harmful
by-products. There are two dominant techniques available using UV light:
Direct photodissociation-
Complex chemical bonds are instantly destroyed by the action of a suitable wavelength of UV
light, breaking the harmful compound down ("mineralization") into simple (and benign) common
compounds consisting of such things as carbon dioxide, hydrogen, oxygen, chlorine, and/or
nitrogen. The minimum (or shortest) necessary wavelength of light for any desired reaction
depends upon the actual bonds that one desires to destruct. I've left for you a few hardcopy
references about this in a binder, along with numerous other supporting documentation.
Indirect Photolysis-
This "Advanced Oxidation Technology" is a two-step photo-destruction method whereby the UV
light first photo-dissociates a small amount of peroxide that has been added into the water
stream prior to the UV reactor, thereby forming powerful hydrogen radicals that directly combine
with the toxic compounds and effectively breaks them down into their benign mineralized
components.
The Pulsed UV light produced by the Lightstream LSi -series is particularly well-suited for these
Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) destruction applications. Indeed, compared to conventional
mercury-based CW lamps, the PUV's extended broadband UV-e output produces both a wider
'.'
Robert M. lantis
Vice President & eTa
LightStream Technologies Page 2 of 4

12200 Sunrise Valley Drive 612612003
703.480.2464 FAX- 703.480.2481
_ _0:: bantis@LightStreamUV,com Perchlorate Remediation Lightstream.doc
LightStream
range of wavelengths, and over an order of magnitude greater instantaneous UV photon flux
density upon targeted chemicals. Additionally, in many cases either one or both of the above
techniques can be utilized at the same time (this capability is entirely VOe-specific),. further
increasing the efficacy and efficiency of the remediation process. The LSi PUV unit will perform
most UV photolysis work very well, because it was designed from the start with this as a goal.
Our initial interest and early development work on UV remediation was for this particular
application.
LightStream Pulsed UV can more effectively break shorter wavelength-dependent bonds, in part
because more of the desirable (I.e., shorter wavelength) photons can be produced by PUV. For
example, following is a cha.rt comparing UV lamp output spectra:
UV Lamp Output Spectra

Comparison
8-,-----------------------;
7+-~----------+_---------'
.. 6 + - - - - - - - - - - + - ---~--+-............,
u
c:
. ! ! ! 5 + - - - - - - - - .....- __- - - - - _ a _ - H
'g
~4+-----____;a_-____A
_ __ t _ ___..._.-_r__i___.,.fI-1
~
;: 3 + - - - - -
~ .
2+-----
o~....._ ·
200 '210 220 230 240 250 260 270 280 290 300
Wavelength Inm)
• LightStream PUV o CW Mercury MP Dew Mercury LP

Robert M. Lantis
Vice President & eTC
LightStream Technologies Page3of4

12200 Sunrise Valley Drive 6126/2003
Reston. VA 20191 USA
703.480.2464 FAX- 703.480.2481
_ . .~ Lantis@LightStreamUV.com Perchlorate Remediation Lightstream.doc
LightStream
Another important differentiator is the 6,000,000 Watts peak UV-C power per pulse output
capability of the LightStream PUV light source. This means that the cross-sectional area of the
targeted VOC receives from the PUV source an enormously higher instantaneous UV photon
flux density than is possible with any of the mercury-based CW lamp sources. As an example
that simply describes this advantage, one of our customers mentioned the following analogy.
/( you were blindfolded and had to destroy a s~all (and moving) target located at some
unknown distance within an area defined by a conical section downrange of you, which weapon
would you rather use: a hundred bullets fired from a machine gun randomly spraying the area
over a pen'od of 10 seconds; or else, the same hundred bullets fired at the same instant from
one source, uniformly covering the targeted area at once, with all the combined kinetic energy
am'ving on site within in a few millionths of a second? In our case, however, the randomly
distributed and moving perchlorate molecules (perhaps 20 parts per billion distribution?) are the
targets, and our weapon of choice is the high UV photon density delivery mechanism of Pulsed
UV.
Regarding the ability of UV to dissociate certain compounds: a majority of the most common
bonds can be destroyed with the light produced by LightStream PUV. A good photo-chemist
could provide a more complete listing than what I've provided you (under separate cover), but I'"
include herein for you a few examples1.
Chemical Wavelength Dissociation

Bond Snm Energy kcallmol
C:C 346.1 82.6'
C-CI 353.0 81
C-F 246.5 116.0
C-H 289.7 98.7
C-N 392.7 12.8
1 Dean, J.A., ed., "Lange's Handbook of Chemistry: 11 ed., McGraw-Hili. New York, 1973, p. 3-123
.. .- ~
Robert M. Lantis
Vice President & eTa
LightStream Technologies Page4of4

12200 Sunrise Valley Drive 6126/2003
703.480.2464 FAX· 703.480.2481
_ _,,;;: Lantis@LighlStreamUV.com Perchlorate Remediation Lightstream.doc
LightStream
coO 334.4 85.5
C-S 439.9 65.0
H-H 274.4 104.2
N-N 549.8 52.0
N=N 476.5 60.0
N-H (NH 3) 280.3 102.0
N-O 595.6 48.0
0-0 (02) 240.1 119.1
O-H (water) 243.3 117.5
SoH 344.5 83.0
SoN 248.6 115.0
S-O 240.3 119.0
The destruction of these (among other) bonds are all within the capability of the LSi unit ·off the
shelf' and available now. Note that for highest efficiency hydrogen peroxide photolysis, a UV-C
source with abundant 240 nm delivery is preferred, thereby making the LSi PUV the best
choice. Of course, if there were some compelling need to achieve delivery of even shorter
wavelength light (e.g., 185 nm), then our PUV source could in time be replaced with one that is
specifically designed for such output. As the literature shows, however, the PUV delivered by
the LSi can be a very effective remediation tool "as_is".
Josh, I hope this gives you a clear general summary of the most important points and how
LightStream is uniquely po.ised as a solution provider for VOC rer:nediation applications. For
some more detailed information, please refer to the binder I've left you in the conference room.
If I may be of any further assistance, please don't hesitate to let me know.
Best regards,
-Bob
....
special
section: security
Pulsed-UV unit may inactivate biological agents
TESTS WERE CONOUCTtO TO OtTER MINE WHtlHtR A L1liHISIKtAM I'UL5tU-ULTKAYIOUl UISINttCIION UNII COUW I'KOYIUE SUffl·
CIENT TREATMENT IN THE EVENT A BIOLOGICAL AGENT WAS RELEASED INTO A WATER SUPPLY.
ests on a pulsed-ultraviolet (UV) dislnfec used for verification tests for water and waste
_
T tion unit have shown that It can deliver
high germicidal dosages to effectively
inactivate highly resistant known pathogens.
water disinfection applications.
'HydroQual Inc. and LightStream Technologies
conducted the tests on the LightStream LSI
These tests were done in anticipation of applying pulsed-UV disinfection unit. LightStream was par
this unit to situations in which biological weapons ticularly interested in applying a combination of
may have been released into a water supply to a conditions that couJd present a significant chal
buJldlng or other facility as well as into small lenge to the unit. i.e., flow rates approximating a
community water systems. Until now, little or no buJlding supply in excess of 50-60 gpm (3.2-3.8
information has been available regarding continu Lis) combined with significantly reduced water
ous-flow. dose-delivery verification tests on com transmissivity «65%). Under such conditions.
mercial systems at dose levels approaching 250 doses greater than approximately 240 mJlcm 2
were observed. This estimated dose is at
the upper limit of current ability to
measure UV using a common substitute
Imllcator organIsm.
A general review of the literature
and the US Environmental Protection
Agency's (USEPA's) draft UV Design
Guidance (USEPA. 2001) Indicates that
this observed dose by the LSi is in the
range reqUired for apprOXimately 5-6
log reductions (99.9999%) of the
anthrax spore (Bacillus anihracis), the
more resistant of the known. listed'
pathogenic bacteria and viruses.
Greater log reductions would be
expected for other. more sensitive. listed
and known pathogenic bacteria and
vh~us~.
The delivered dosages at higher trans

mittances (85-95%) normally found In
The ....t system th.It wa. set up at the Leesburg. Va. POlluti... C...arol FecllitJ Inclu_ municipal drtnking water sources were
this so~ce taM. estimated by using the ratio of intensities
at the same flow rate. Thls is based on
mJ/cm 2 . Tests conducted at the Leesburg. Va.. Pol an intensity calculation at 254 nm using the pOint
lution Control Facility Sept. 17. 2002, challenged source summation method (USEPA. 1986), A con
the system by varying water flow rates. pulse fre servative estimate suggests that a delivered dose
quencies, and water transmittance levels. The tests under such conditions would be in excess of 1.100
were conducted to characterize. to the extent pos mJ/cm 2 at high transmittances.
sible. the ability of the system to deliver high ger· The performance of a disinfection reactor Is
micidal dose levels that would be comparable to directly related to Its ability to deliver an effective
those reqUired to effectively inactivate highly germicidal dose. In the case of. UV radiation, and
resistant, 1c.nown pothogens. Estimoted dose deliv under id",,1 condltion3. thl3 13 computed ... the
ery was tested by challenging the dIsinfection unit product of the intensity of radiation and the time
with MS2 bacteriophage. the indicator organism of exposure to the radiation and is typically
Repnnted from Jou,"""" AWWA, Volume 95. No.6. by.permosslon. Copynght 2003. American Weter WorkS A3socletlon.
'''0·
special
section: security
The lSi pulsecl...llraviolel unk can deliver high

germicidal dosage. to a"ecllvely inactivate highly
,eslslanl"'own palhog....
"expressed as milliJoules/square centimeter.

Direct calculation of the dose delivered by a
UV radiation disinfection system is not possi
ble, however, because of the inherent nonideaJ
conditions that exist in commercial, continu
ous-flow units. There is a distribution of expo
sure times llIld II vllrillble intensity field within
the reactor, such that there is a dose distribu
tion in the reactor, and the average delivered
dose is some fraction of the ideal dose. How
ever, an indirect method can be used In which a
known organism's response to accurately mea
sured UV doses Is measured under controlled lab challenge organism. Dose-response measurements
oratory conditions using a collimated-beam, have been generated with this organism up to a
batch-exposure apparatus. This "calibrated" practical dose limit of approximately 250 mJ/cm 2•
organism is then passed through the test unit, LightStream Technologies expressed interest in
which is operated at power input, hydraulic, and demonstrating the delivery of high doses in excess
water quality conditions representative of its of 240 mJ/cm 2 In anticipation of applications
expected commercial application, and the reduc that could counter bIological weapons released in
tion in its Viable density or concentration is mea a water supply to bUildIngs or other facilities. In
sured. On the basis of this reduction (expre.~sed as a general review of data available from the litera
the log of its surVival ratio, NINo, in which Nand ture, through Information prOVided In Aerobio
No are the final and initial organism concentra logical Engineering (Penn State, 2002), and
tions, respectively) and laboratory calibration of USEPA's draft UV Design Guidance (USEPA.
the organism's response to UV dose, the dose 2001). the anthrax spore (B. anthracis) appears
delivered by the test unit can be eStimated. This to be the more resistant of the listed, known
procedure, known as biodosimetry, or bioassay, pathogenic bacteria and viruses. Log reductions
was applied to lhe LSI at Leesburs. In this case, a on the order of 5 to 6 may require a dose
common bacteriophage. MS2, was used as the between 200 and 300 mJ/cm 2 •
There is little or no available infor
mation on continuous-flow, dose-deliv
ery verification tests that have been
TABLE 1 Telt conditions for the LSi unit-Sept. 17, 2002
conducted on commercial systems at
dose levels approaching 250 mJ/cm 2 . A
key element in the successful conduct of
lransminance such high-dose vertOcation testing is the
Flow Rate Pulse Frequency at 254 nm
gpm (Lis) Hl l availability of a nonpathogenIc" indica
tor" or challenge organism. This "indi
50 (3.1) 20 65
50 (31)
cator" organism must exhibit several
20 65
50 (3,1)
key propeMies needed for such testing:
30 65
• The organism·.must have a low
75 (4.7) 30 65
75 (47)
sensitivity to UV radiation so that high
30 65
75 (4.7)
doses are required to effect significant
20 65
reductions.
spec~al "
section: secunty
• The organism can be

grown and harvested in large
enough quantities and at hlgh
Specifications
enough densities to allow mea

surement of a significant log for the Disinfection Unit
reduction (greater than 4 logs).

• Enumeration of the organ Disinfection: Pulsed-ultraviolet light
ism is relatively efficient.
..• The microorganism is Reactor: Closed vessel
benign and poses no health or
ecological risks. Lamp: Single flash lamp'
• The microorgoni.m '.
response to UV is reproducible
Wavelengths: Broadband UV-C, 200 to 300 nm
and consistent.
A microorganism capable of
meeting these criteria and hav UV dose delivery: Discrete pulses, 1 to 30 Hz
Ing a measurable senSitivity at
doses greater than 200 to 300 UV dose measurement Continuous in real time
mJlcm 2 has not been identified.
Use of a chemical acti!10meter Process control: Constant, performance confirmed
can be considered in lieu of a
biological Indicator. However. System control: Continuous, real time
this will not yield a direct mea
sure of biological dose delivery Operation: Automated
(particularly with a broadband
lamp) without calibration to
germicidal effectiveness, which
Electrical input voltage: 380 to 500 VAC 3-phase
Is a key concern. 50/60 Hz
TECHNICAL APPROACH FOR HIGH Average power: 2,400 W UV-C

DOSE DELIVERY VERIFICATION
High-dose delivery by the LSi Peak power: 6,000,000 WUV-C per pulse
unit was estimated by challeng
ing it with an MS2 bacterio Size, W )( 0)( H, mm (in.): 1,350 (53.2) W x 1.800
phage. nus organism has been (70.9) 0 x 2,325 (91.6) H
Widely used for verification tests
in both drinking water and
wastewater disinfection applica
Unit construction: Stainless steel
tions. with a measurable
dose-response relationshlp as Flow capacity: Up to 160m3/h (1 mgd); optimized
high as 250 mJlcm 2• at which to application
point It exhlbits an approxi·
mately 6.5- to 7-log reduction. Installation: "Plug and play"
Testing at these levels requires
using a high initial density of Controls: Touch screen PC
MS2. greater than lOS pfulmL.
Beyond thiS. higher denSities are Control access: Local. supervisory control and data
required. which begin to inter
fere with the experimental meth
acquisition, Ethernet
ods because of aggregation of
the phage. Instead. an estimate Languages: Chosen by operator
of higher dose capacities was
made by extrapolation to higher lXenon. Perkin Elmer. Fremont, Calif,
"",
spec~al .
sectIon: secunty
FIGURE 1 DOIIHlI.PO.... r.lno...hip
240
220
200 I
y = 5.5075.:+ 0._7. + 13.945
180 R .0.9542
180
1
140
120
100
8
80
80
40
20
0
-7.00 --4.00 -5.00 4.00 -R.OO -1.00 0.00
Survlval-lllII NIN.
dose levels. Although it cannot be assumed to be batches was provided from a potable water source
an absolute measurement, in the absence of a via a local hydrant.
direct measure It offers a reasonable and fairly Flow control and metering were provided with
efficient method with which to e:ttim"te the higher "n LSI feed pump. ScIlUJ.lJ" J.lUI1.l> (0.5 In. [12.5
dose-delivery capacities of the system. mm]) were proVided on the influent and effluent
sides of the unit. The effluent from the unit was
MATERIALS AND METHODS discharged to the wastewater treaunent plant. A
LSi lest unit The commercial LSi unit contains UV spectrophotometer was used OIlSlte to mea
a single flash lamp.1 The lamp has an average UV sure the batch water transmittance at 254 nm dur
C rating of 2,400 W, with a peak power per pulse Ing batch preparation.
of 6,000.000 W. The LSi reactor contains" now 101lt materiel•• A stock of MS2 culJJ.lili1ge was
affecting baffling system that was adapted for the cultured, harvested, and calibrated at HydroQual
flow rates antidpated for the testing. It delivers by procedures set out In the USEPA Environmen
energy in discrete pulses over a variable range of I tal Technology Verification (ETV) Prow-am proto
to 30 Hz; the standard operating condition is 20 cols (HydroQual. 2002). Freeze-dried Instant cof
Hz. The power supply to the LSi unit was 480 fee was used to adjust the batch water's
VAC, 45 amps, three-phase. All power and electri transminanceat 254 nm to approXimately 65%.
cal meterinB was provided with the LSi system. Sodium thiosulfate (technicIII grade, CI'yM"llill")
Test facility. The test system was set up. includ was used for dechlorinating the batch water. A
ing the piping and feed tank. at the Leesburg Pol chlorine residual test kit was used to verify com
lution Control Facility in Leesburg. A 9,700 gal plete dechlorination. All samples were delivered
(;)0,715 L) tank was used for the influent batch overnight in I 0 gal (38 L). iced. insulated coolers.
preparation. A 2 in. (50 mm) diameter line and a Balch preparation. The batch tank was IIl1ed
low-flow pump were used to feed the unit from with clean tap water and sampied and measured
the prepared hRI"h A ?OO 8pm (12.6 Us) sub for residual chlorine. Sodium thiosuJf"t~ w,,~
mersible recirculation pump was set in the batch added and the tank contents mixed, after which
tank for mixing. Water for preparation of the the residual chlorine was again measured. This
special
section: security
Abo. . isseedecl
wllh the ...anenge
organism during
testing.
procedure was continued until there was no

measurable residual chlorine. After dechlorina·
tion, the batch water was measured for %Tat
254 11111. Cuff"" Wi:C'> 11"'11 add"d w,ul LII" lJClu;I,
water was at the targeted transmittance of 65%
at 254 nm. MS2 coliphage was then added in
sufficient volume to yield a phage density of
greater than I ()ll pfu/mL in the batch water.
SAMPLING AT TARGETED TEST CONDITIONS

All sample containers were prelabeled before a
lest series was conducted. Upon startup, the flow
was adjusted to the desired rate, sufficient time EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
would be allowed to exchange a minimum of six Testing was completed September 17, and sam
10 seven reactor volumes, and replicate samples ples were returned to the laboratory September
would then be taken from the influent and effluent 18. Figure I shows the dose-response relationship'
taps. The flow would then be adjusted again and developed for the MS2 batch used for the study.
the procedure repeated. Testing was conducted The results of the flow-through tests are summa·
under the conditions summarized in Table 1. rized In Table 2. Doses greater than 240 mJ/cm 2 are
Laboratory analysis. Samples were shipped expressed as ">240 mJ/cm 2 " to avoid extrapolation
overnight for each test series and analyzed within beyond the dose-response calibration.
48 hours of receipt. Each influent and effluent The MS2 results show some degree of variabil
was measured for % T at 254 nm using a spec· ity and contradiction. The highest phage reduc
trophotometer. 2 MS2 bacteriophage were enumer tion was accomplished at 50 gpm (3.1 Us) and a
ated in each influent and effluent sample by ISO pulse rate of 20 Hz. The measured log reductions
method 10705 (lSO. 1995). Dose-response testing were 5.65 and 7.17. suggesting dose levels of 190
using a col/lmated beam was performed by proce and >240 mJ/cm 2 , respectively. An equivalent log
dures outlined In the USEPA ETV protocol reduction (6.27) was observed at 7S gpm (4.7 Us)
(HydroQual,2002). and 20 Hz. although lower reductions would have
been expected. The suggested deliv
ered dose is estimated at 230 mJ/cm 2•
At the higher pulse frequency, the
TABLE 2 Summary 01 resulll
reductions were all equivalent to dose
levels greater than 240 m]lcm 2 .
Given the limited data developed
lstlmated during this phase of the project. it is
Flow Pulse Innuent '11.1 SlM'VN'81 Dose
difficult to assess the relationships
gpm (Us) Hz %1/cm
I 109 NINo mJ/cm2
among the different conditions, partic
50 (3.11 20 60.9 ! -5.65 190
ularly with respeCI to interpolation
50 (3.1) 30 61.9 I -6.86 ,240
between the high and low levels. We
50 (3.1)
75 (4.7)
20
20
59.1
58.5
II -7.17
-6.27
,240
230
suggest. however. thl:tt the unit demon·
strated the ability to deliver dose levels
75 (~.7) 30 631 i -6.76 ,240
75 (4.7)
at or above 200 mJ/cm 2 under the
30 64.7 -6.93 ,240
dose conditions Imposed on the unit.
The average dose delivered at the mid·
speci,al .
section: security
dose range was approximately 240 mj/cm 2. The (85-95%). can be estimated. however, byexam
highest dose should have been observed at about ining the ratio of the intensity In the reactor at
400 mJ/cm 2 • jf a factor of 1.5 times was applied to the different transmittance levels. HydroQual
the mid-level dose or 500 mJ/cm 2 If a factor of 1.5 used an Intensity calculation at 254 nm using
x 1.5 was applied to the observed low-dose condi the point source summation method (USEPA.
tion. Observation of such dose levels was not pos 1986) and estimated that the dose increases by a
-sible under the expeIimental conditions of the test. factor of approximately 2.6 when moving from
MS2 responses would be substantJally greater than a transmittance of about 60% to 85% and by
7-log reductJons. moving Into a nonmeasurable 4.6 when going to a transmittance of 95%.
range because the exposed samples would be effec Thus. If It Is assumed that at 50 gpm (3.1 LIs).
tJvely nondetectable. 20 Hz. and 60% transmittance the observed
This estJmated dose Is at the upper Iimjt of cur delivered dose Is approximately 250 m]/cm 2
rent ability to measure using a substitute Indicator (which Is a conservative estimate based on the
organism. A general review of the literature and preceding discussions). it could be suggested
USEPA's draft UV Design Guidance (USEPA, that a dose of up to 650 and 1.100 mj/cm 2 wllJ
2001) Indicates that this observed dose by the LSi be achieved by the LSI unit at transmittances of
is in the ronge required for log reduction. on the 85% and 95%. respectively (keeping the condi
order of 5 to 6 (99.9999%) of the anthrax spore tions of 50 gpm [3.1 LIs] and 20 Hz). These
(E. anrhrads). the more resistant of the listed and doses are well above those estimated for elimi
known pathogenic bacteria and viruses. Greater nation (5 to 6 log reductions) of listed and
log reductJons would be expected for other more known pathogenic bacteria or viruses. Certainly
sensltJve listed and known pathogenic bacteria more work is warranted to verify this assess
and viruses. ment. but it is reasonable to suggest these dose
levels for the LSI based on the dala colJ"t:t"ll
ESTIMATING DOSE AT HIGHER WATER during this phase of the study.
TRANSMISSIVITY
The reported test conditions were limited to -Egon Weber is project managar and Karl Schaible ;s
those presenting a more significant challenge to principal both at HydroQuallnc., One Lethbridge Plaza,
the LSI unit by utilizing lower transmissivity lev Mahwah. NJ 07430. Weber and Schaible can be reached
els «65%) more commonly associated with at (201) 529-5151 or at eweber@hydroqual,com and
sewage water. The estimated dose under these kscheible~hydroqualcom.
conditions is at the upper limit of ability to mea
sure using an Indicator organism. The delivered FOOTNOTES
IXenon, P",k.in Elme,. Fremorll. Calif
dose at higher transmittances. which are more 2tN·120J 'SPt'etropholome'~r.ShJmadzu Scienliflc~I"5tNments,
representative of drinking water sources Columbia. Md
REFERENCES ity-Detection and Enumera USEPA. 2001. Draft UV Disinfec

HydroQual,2002. Gel)eric UV Equip. tion of Bacteriophages-Part tion Guidance Manual.
ment Verification Prolocol for 1, Enumeration of F-specific • Office of Drinking Water
Reuse and Secondary Effluent RNA Ba cteriophages. and Ground Water,
Applications: Version 3.4. NSF Method ISO 10705-1 Washington.
International, USEPA Environ (Aug. 1995).
USEPA, 1986. Design Manual
mental Technology Verification
Pennsylvania State University IPenn Municipal Wastewater
Program, prepared by Hydro
State). 2002. Ultraviolet Germi· Disinfection, Office of
Quallnc.IJan.2oo2).
cidallrradiation. Aerobiological Research. and Development.
International Standards Organiza Engineeering, EPA/62511-861021,
tion OSOI, 1995. Water Qual· www.engr.psu.edu/ae. Washington.
2
PAGES
REMOVED
3 '71
May 03 Draft
nnn ::lnr Non-non f;itA~
Air Force AmoldAFB Tullahoma TN yes Sed
Air Force BealeAFB Marysville CA yes GW
Air Force Buckley AFB Aurora CO no
Air Force CannonAFB Clovis NM yes OW State requirement;

March 1999 detects
Air Force CapeCodAFS Sandwich MA yes NO
Air Force Davis Monthan AFB Tucson AZ. yes Soil Source - Explosives,
(unconfirmed) Propellant Disposal;
state provisional cleanup
level
Air Force Duluth, Reserve Center Duluth MN yes NO
\
Air Force EdwardsAFB Edwards CA Jet Propulsion Lab, yes GW,soil Source - Rocket
North Base Research
Air Force Ellsworth AFB Rapid City SO yes NO GWsampled
Air Force FE WarrenAFB Cheyenne Wf no
Air Force HiIIAFB Ogden UT yes Soli, GW.DW
Air Force HoliomanAFB Gallup NM yes GW,SW, Source - Rocket Testing

soil/sediment
Air Force KirtlandAFB A1buaueraue NM ves NO
Air Force Lackland AFB San Antonio TX ves Not rePOrted
Air Force LangleyAFB Hampton VA yes Not reported
Air Force Mather AFB Sacramento CA Closed
Air Force McClellan AFB Sacramento CA Closed
Air Force McConnel AFB Wichita KS yes ND Titan Sites - GW, soil
sampled
Air Force Melrose Air Force Range Melrose NM yes OW Source - Explosives
Air Force Moody AFB Valdosta GA no
Mountain Home AFB 10 no
Air Force New Boston AFS Manchester, MA yes ND

NH
OffuttAFB NE no
Air Force OnizukaAFS Sunnyvale CA yes OW-not Awaiting results of

recorted samDlIna
Air Force PatrickAFB Cocoa Beach FL yes ND
Air Force Plant 4 Forth Worth TX yes ND

Air Force Planl42 Palmdale CA yes ND
Air Force Plant 44 Tucson AZ. yes ND

Air Force Plant PJKS Waterton CO yes NO
Air Force Poinsett Range ShawAFB SC yes GW
Air Force RandolDh AFB San Antonio TX no

Air Force Sheppard AFB Wltchita Falls TX yes Not reported
Air Force TinkerAFB Oklahoma City OK no
Sed - sediment Air Force TravisAFB Fairfield CA yes Not reported SW - surface water
GW· groundwater Air Force Vandenberg AFB Lompoc CA yes Soil NO - non detect
OW - drinking water lof6 DB/DO - open burnt open detonation
-
May 03 Draft
n, ,n::mc Nnn_nnn ~. tp_~
Air Force Westover AFB Chicopee MA no
Air Force Wight-Patterson AFB Dayton OH yes NO
Anny Aberdeen Proving Ground Aberdeen MO COA drinking water yes OW State has issued heanh
advisory for the City of
Aberdeen of 1 ppb
perchlorate in drinking
water. State has issued
a Dran Administrative
Order to the APG to
monitor, evaluate, and
cleanup perchlorate
contamination. APG has
ceased training w/
\ perchlorate containing
munitions in the affected
area.
Army Aberdeen Proving Ground Aberdeen MD COA well field yes GW See above.
Army Aberdeen Proving Ground Aberdeen MD COAwelis yes GW See above.
Anny Aberdeen Proving Ground Aberdeen MO Harford drinking yes OW See above.
water
Army Aberdeen Proving Ground Aberdeen MD Harford well field no See above.
Anny Aberdeen Proving Ground Aberdeen MD Harford wells yes GW See above.
Anny Badger Army Ammunition Baraboo WI yes NO state requested

Plant samnlinn
Army Camp Bonneville Vancouver WA yes Soil,GW Camp Bonneville is
listed by EPA as a
potential source for
perchlorate releases.
Source - Explosives, .
Propellant Disposal,
missile disoosal
Anny Camp Bullis San Antonio TX OB/OD area yes GW Sampled in 2001 & 2002
due to requesl from state
regulators
Anny Camp Navajo Bellemont r-;z Detonation Pits yes GW
Anny Dugway Proving Ground Dugway UT no Dugway is preparing a

proposal for perchlorate
assessment.
Anny Fort Meade Odenton MD OB/ODareas yes· GW

Anny Fort Wingate Gallup NM OB/OD areas yes GW BRAC site currently
under State Cleanup
Anny Jefferson Proving Ground Madison IN Range boundaries yes Sample results pending
QAlQC.
Anny Lake Clly Anny Independence MO yes GW
Ammunition Plant
Anny Lone Star Anny Texarkana TX Burning Ground yes GW
Ammunition Plant
Anny Lone Star Anny Texarkana TX Production Bldg yes Soil
Ammunition Plant

GW - groundwater NO - non detecl
OW - drinking water 20f6 DB/DO - open burn! open detonation
May 03 Draft
n. ,n ;:)n, Nnn-nnn ~:n..c::
Army longhorn AmJy Karnack TX yes Soil,GW, SW lHAAP is being used to

Aummition Plant test and study dillerent
perchlorate cleanup
technologies as well as
being used to study
ecological effects 01
perchlorate. Source
Propellant Handling
Army Massachusetts Military Falmouth MA MMR OB/OO areas yes GW EPA Region 1 ras
Reservation directed a screening
level 01 1.5 ppb and a
cteanup level ot 4
ppbMassachusetts
Oepartmentot
\ Environmental
Protection (MOEP) has
issued a health advisory
01 1 ppb in drinking
water lor the Towne 01
Bourne. Towne ot
Bourne have been shut
down and USACE has
built a pipeline
connecting Bourne w~h
a regional water supply.
Army Massachusetts Military Falmouth MA Bourne water supply yes OW See above
Reservation wells
Army Massachusetts Mililary Falmouth MA Gallow Skating Rink yes GW See above.
Reservation
Army Massachusetts Military Falmouth MA MMR Impact areas yes GW See above.
Reservation
Army Massachusetts Military Falmouth MA MMR Testing ranges yes GW See above.
Reservation
Army Massachusetts Mililary Falmouth MA MMR Training yes GW See above.
Reservation ranoes
Army Massachusetts Mililary Falmouth MA yes GW Source - OB/OO. See
Reservation above.
Army McAlester Army McAlester OK Brown lake yes SW State and EPA Region 6
Ammun~ion Plant directed sampling 01
adjacent lakes using
RCRA 3004 authorily.
No sampling yet
conducted at the OB/OO
pending agreement
between state and EPA
Region 6
Army McAlester Army McAlester OK OB/OO areas no See above.

Ammunition Plant
Army McAlester Army McAlester OK Rocket lake yes SW See above.
Ammunition Plant
Army Red River Army Depot Texarkana TX OB/OO areas yes SW State requires quarterly .
sampling ot OB/OO
siles.State has added
perchlorate to RRAO's
TPOES permil.State has
asked RRAD to develop
a Pollution Prevention
Control Plan (PPCP) to
address perchlorate.
Army Red River Army Depot Texarkana TX Sanitary Sewage yes Soil,GW See above
Plant
Sed - sediment Army Red River Army Depot Texarkana TX yes GW Source - Propellant
SW - surface water
GW- groundwater Handlinn. See above.
NO - non detect
OW - drinking water 3016 OB/OO - open bum! open detonation
May 03 Draft
non ~nr Non-non ,~n~!':
Anny Redstone Arsenal Huntsville AL yes GW There are two known

plumes of perchlorate.
Currently no drinking
water sources are
threatened but the
plumes are moving off-
site.
Anny Seneca Army Depot Romulus NY no Seneca Army Depot has
been directed by
regulators to a~sess for
perchlorate. Seneca is
evaluating the request
no action as of vet.
Army White Sands Missile Las Cruces NM yes Soil Source - Rocket Testing
Ranoe
DOE Los Alamos National Lab Los Alamos NM \ yes GW.DW Source - DoE Lab
Chemicals
DOE Sandia National Lab NM
DOE Lawrence Livermore Tracy CA yes GW Source - DoE Explosives
National Laboratory S~e Research
300
DOE Energy Technology CA
Enoineerino Center
DOE PANTEX Plant Amarillo TX ves GW Source - Exolosives
FUDS Kerr-McGee Perchlorate Henderson NV yes GW,SW,DW Source - Chemical
Plant Manufacturinn
FUDS Nike 14 Launcher Area CA yes Records search will
address potential FUDS
eligibil~ for emergent
chemicals identified in
letter rec'd from reg
agency.
FUDS Pyrite Canyon Glen Avon CA Need to establish FUDS

elinibilitv . Records
FUDS Rialto (formerly Rialto Rialto CA Drinking water yes (by DW Source - Fireworks
Ammunition S~oolv Poinll suoolvwells Armvor Facilitvl ?\ BF Goodrich
FUDS Shumaker NAD Camden AR Surlicial Aquifer yes GW USACE has conducted
PRP investinations that
NASA NASA - Jet Propulsion Pasadena CA yes DW Source - Rocket
'. Lab Ravmond Basin Research
Navy Brunswick NAS Brunswick ME EODRange yes Not reported
Navy China Lake China Lake CA Test and Training yes yes
Ranoe
Naw Concord Concord CA no
Navy Corona Corona CA yes Not reported
Navy Crane Crane IN yes Not reported
Navy Dahlgren Dahlgren VA no
Navy EI Toro Irvine CA EOD Range yes GW BRAC
Navy Indian Head Indian Head MD propellant handling yes GW,SW

GW - groundwater Navy Lualualei, Rocket Test Lualualei HI yes no NO - non detect
DW - drinking water Facilitv IAnf'" OBIOD - open burn/ open detonalTon
May 03 Draft
n, ,n ",n, t\Jnn_nnn ~. t",,,
Component Facility Name City State Test SitelSource Sampled Detected Comments
Navy McGregor Naval McGregor TX propellant handling yes Soil,GW,SW Closed

Weanons Plant
Navy Nomans Island MA bombing range yes Not reported Transferred
Navy San Nicholas Island Ventura CA EOD Range yes GW

Counlv
Naw Seal Beach Seal Beach CA ves Not reported
Navy South Weymouth EX-NAS Weymouth MA EOD Range yes Not reported BRAC
Navy White Oak Fed. Research Silver Spring MD propellant handling yes GW BRAC ,
Center (Naval Surface
Non-DoD Aerodyne Gila River Ind. Chandler AZ. yes GW
Res
Non-DoD Aerojet General (affect's Rancho CA yes GW,DW Source - Rocket
MatherAFBI Cordova Manufacturino
Non-DoD Allegheny Ballistics Lab Rocket Center WV , yes GW Source - Rocket
Research Production
Non-DoD Alliant Tech Systems Magna UT yes OW Source - Rocket
Manufacturina
Non-DoD '" Alpha ExplosiVes Lincoln CA yes GW,SW Source - Explosives
Manufacturina
Non-DoD American Water Work Greenwood IN yes OW
Service unconfirmed\
Non-DoD American Weter Work Clinton IA yes OW
Service unconfirmed
Non-DoD American Weter Works Clovis NM yes OW
Service unconfirmed
Non-DoD American Weter Works Yardely PA yes OW
Service unconfirmed
Non-DoD Apache N~rogen Products Benson AZ. yes GW Source - Explosive
Manufacturino
Non-DoO- Atlantic Research East Camden AR yes Soil,GW, SW Source - Rocket
Manufacturino. OBOD
Non-DoD BoeingJRocketdyne, Santa Susana CA yes GW Source - Rocket
NASA at Santa Susana Research, Testing and
Field Lab USDOE Production
Non-DoO Ewart IA Ewart IA ves GW
Non-DoD - Herington, KS Herington KS yes GW Source - Ammun~ion
Facilitv
Non-DoD - ICI Explosives Joplin MO yes GW Source - Explosives
Facililv
Non-DoD ITC (Un~ed San Jose CA yes GW Source - Rocket Testing
" Technoloaiesl
Non-DoD Lewiston, NE Lewiston NE yes OW Source - Agricultural
Chemical Facililv
Non-DoD Lockheed Propulsion Redlands CA yes OW Source - Rocket
Un""r Santa Ana Vallev Manufacturino
Non-DoD Mead, NE Mead NE yes GW Source - Fireworks
Facilit~
Non-DoD- Napier,IA Napier IA yes GW Source - Agricullural (7)
Non-DoD PEPCON Henderson NV yes GW Source - Chemical

Manufacturina
Non-DoD San Fernando Valley Glendale CA yes GW Source - Rocket
Manufacturino
Non-DoD San Gabriel Valley Baldwin Park CA yes 'GW, OW Source - Aerojet, Rocket
Manufacturina
Non-DoD Thiokol Promontory UT yes OW Source - Rocket
Manufacturino
Non-DoD -
Unidynamics Phoenix Inc. Goodyear AZ. Phoenix Goodyear yes GW Source - Explosives,
Aimnrt Ordnance Disoosal
Non-DoD Unidynamics Phoenix Inc. Goodyear AZ. lMlite Tanks yes Soil,DW Source - Explosives,
Disnnsal Area unconfirmed Ordnance Disoosal
Non-DoD Universal Propulsion Phoenix AZ. yes Soil Source - Rocket
Manufacturina
Non-DoD Westhampton Westhampton NY yes GW,DW Source - Agricultural (?)

GW - groundwater Non-DoD - lMlillaker Ordinance Hollister CA yes GW,DW Source - Ordnance NO - non detect
ow - drinking water 5ot6 Manufacturino OB/OD - open burn! open detonation
May 03 Draft
n"n on, I\Inn_nnn C;:' tc"
Non-DoD - VVhittaker-Bermfte Santa Clarita CA yes OW Source - Ordnance

Ordnance Manufacturino
Non-OoO Yaphank Yaphank NY yes GW,DW
- Non-DoD source information obtained from Mayer USEPA data

GW - groundwater NO - non detect
OW - drinking water 60/6 OB/OD - open buml open detonation
PAGE
REDACTED
IN ITS
ENTIRETY
r
../f>
)
L Ms. Irwin,~
Thanks for returning my call. I'm doing a story on perchlorate for the
national desk of the Boston Globe, and would like a statement from the
Department of Defense to include in the story I'm working on.
1. First off, I'd like to know what the Department is doing to clean up
sites contiminated by perchlorate.
2. Has the Department created a list of sites that have perchlorate?
3. What is the Department's position on perchlorate clean up. Does the
Department consider perchlorate a problem?
4. What is the Department's role and position on establishing a safety
standard for perchlorate? Is there a standard the Department considers safe?
5. What does the Department believe to be the proper response to the
perchlorate issue?
6. If the Department were to clean up perchlorate-contiminated sites and
resulting water-quality problems, how much would it cost and how long would
it take?
7. What is the Department's response to those who say that the Department's
bid for exemption from environmental rules is based on the Department's
desire to exempt itself and its contractors from cleaning up perchlorate and
other substances?
I thank you in advance for your help.
Sincerely,
Bobby Calvan
(916) 478-2728
Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.

http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail
2
'"" JXO E-Newsletter For June 2003 - From UXOInfo.com Page I of2
/c;DC)
J
The Following is a paid advertisement From:
Severn Trent Laboratories Inc.

STL Denver 4955 Yarrow Street
10 Arvada, CO 80002
Tel 303 7360100
I
Fax3034317171
l www.stl-inc.com
A part of Severn Trent PI(;
STL Denver Now Offers Perchlorate Ion Analysis by LC/MS/MS
Based on EPA SW-846 guidelines for calibration and quality control, STL Denver's LC/MS scientists
developed a method for the analysis of perchlorate in water and soil. For perchlorate, STL Denver is
now able to attain quantitative results below stringent risk-based action levels in water.
Water Soil
Reporting Limit 0.2 uglL 5.0 ug/kg
Method Detection Limit 0.05 uglL 0:9 ug/kg
10/6/2005
.... UXO E-Newsletter For June 2003 ,- From UXOInfo.com Page 20f2
The anion perchlorate has emerged in recent years as a significant threat to drinking water supplies and
the environment. Elevated concentrations of perchlorate have been detected in both surface and
groundwater throughout the United States. Used in solid rocket propellant, pyrotechnics/explosives,
fertilizers and a component of air bag inflators, the high mobility and persistence of perchlorate in
ground and surface waters makes it a potentially serious threat to drinking water supplies.
Perchlorate affects human health by interfering with iodide uptake into the thyroid gland. Because
iodide is an essential component of thyroid hormones, perchlorate disrupts how the thyroid functions. In
adults, the thyroid helps-to regulate metabolism. In children, the thyroid plays a major role in proper
development in addition to metabolism.
In 1998, perchlorate was placed on EPA's Contaminant Candidate List. In November 1999, EPA
published EPA Ie Method 314.0 for the determination of perchlorate in drinking water. In 2000, EPA
recommended that perchlorate concentrations in drinking water be no liigher than 18 ppb. March 2002,
EPA released for public review and comment its revised draft toxicity assessment suggesting that the
potential human health risks of perchlorate exposures. Risks include effects on the developing nervous
system and thyroid tumors. EPA is now recommending that the perchlorate concentration in drinking
water be no higher than 1.0 uglL.
For additional information, please contact:

Lab Director:
Timothy M. O'Shields
Tel. 303-736-0183
Fax. 303-431-7171
toshields@stl-inc.com
>
10/612005
PAGE
REMOVED
. JJ1'nmww!' . 1trrt' st'; ..

Wall Street Journal
June 20, 2003
Pentagon Backs Off Water-Test Plan

Fuel-Ingredient Perchlorate Is Center OfFight With EPA on Studies
Near Bases
By Peter Waldman, Staff Reporter Of The Wall Street Journal
The Pentagon is backing off a proposal to test for perchlorate at all defense sites in the
U.S. in response to complaints from unifonned officials that it was too costly and
unnecessary.
The Environmental Protection Agency for more than two years has been urging the
Pentagon to test the groundwater beneath all its bases for perchlorate, a component of
solid rocket fuel that pollutes water supplies in 20 states and that the EPA says may
damage infant development. But the Defense Department resisted widespread testing,
arguing that it should instead focus on sites where the substance is known to have been
handled and where it poses a demonstrable threat to public drinking water.
The EPA seemed to gain the upper hand earlier this month when the office of John Paul
2
Woodley Jr., assistant deputy undersecretary of defense for the environment, circulated
draft guidelines that would have mandated perchlorate testing of all active, inactive and
closed defense sites. It also would have compelled the military services to "plan and
program for future cleanup" in places where the groundwater is found to coritain
perchlorate in levels above one part per billion. That threshold marked an additional
concession to the EPA because its toxicologists believe that anything above that level is
unsafe, while military scientists say that as much as 200 parts per billion is safe.
But some of the uniformed services complained that such comprehensive testing was
unmerited and would consume tens of millions of dollars from scarce environmental
cleanup budgets, Defense Department officials said. So the proposal was scrapped, with
Mr. Woodley now saying the draft guidelines "don't necessarily reflect my thinking." He
added, "We're engaged with the services on deciding what steps we should take during
this period of regulatory uncertainty."
This winter, after stiff opposition from the Pentagon and the White House, the EPA asked
the National Academies of Science to review its draft report on how much perchlorate
should be deemed dangerous to public health. The delay likely will add at least a year to
the EPA's long process for setting a drinking-water standard.
Mr. Woodley said that in the meantime, any Pentagon testing guidelines would reflect "a
great deal of deference" to scientific uncertainties about perchlorate's health effects.
"Testing is something we should do, and probably will do eventually, but it's a question
of priorities," he said, while acknowledging that "every military base has, at one time or
another, had munitions that included a perchlorate component."
The aborted testing proposal has caused confusion at some bases. At Mare Island Naval
Shipyard near San Francisco, Navy cleanup coordinator Jerry Dunaway announced the
guidelines at a recent community meeting and agreed for the first time to a longstanding
EPA request to test the base perchlorate. Later, he found out the draft guidelines were
moot and rescinded his announcement.
"It's troublesome to have directives around that create an incomplete characterization of a

site," said Emily Roth, EPA's project manager for Mare Island. "We'll never sign off on'
this site without perchlorate sampling."
The draft guidelines from Mr. Woodley's office were issued at a time when some senators
concerned about the perchlorate issue, including California Democrat Barbara Boxer,
were holding up his nomination to the new post of assistant secretary of the Army in
charge of the Army Corps of Engineers' civil works. The Senate h~s yet to act on his
nomination.
"Our policy is under constant review," Mr. Woodley said. "This was a draft for the
purpose of attracting views. "
3
Page I of3
b/5
-:-;
~- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Daily Environment Report for 26 Sep 2003
State to Set Perchlorate Standards For Site Cleanups, Drinking Water
BOSTON --Massachusetts is in the process of establishing specific regulatory standards for

perchlorate, a chemical found in munitions and recently discovered in a well adjacent to the
Massachusetts Military Reservation on Cape Cod, Gov. Mitt Romney (R) said Sept. 24.
Currently the state's Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) has only a state advisory level of
I part per billion for perchlorate in drinking water for sensitive populations.
However, as part of an overall review of cleanup standards by the agency's Bureau of Waste
Prevention, the DEP has decided to issue both a standard for the cleanup of perchlorate-contaminated
sites under the state's superfund law and a maximum contaminant level for drinking water.
Perchlorate, a substance found in rockets, munitions, and explosives, can cause thyroid disease and
other developmental problems, according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
EPA submitted a draft health risk assessment on perchlorate to the National Academy of Sciences for
review earlier this year because of conflicting views over what is considered a safe level for perchlorate,
EPA spokeswoman Suzanne Ackerman said Sept. 25. The academy has just completed assembling a
10/6/2005
Page 2 of3
panel to assess the information and is expected to provide the review to EPA as early as spring 2004.
The draft risk assessment, issued in January 2002, recommended a reference dose--an estimate of the
amount of a substance that a healthy person could safely be exposed to over a lifetime--of 1 part per
billion (16 DEN A-3, 1/24/02).
However, the Defense Department has objected to that level, saying the reference dose does not need
to be fixed that low.
State Advisory Committee Convened.
DEP spokesman Ed Coletta told BNA Sept. 25 the state agency has convened a Health Effects
Advisory Committ~e to review the available toxicological information on perchlorate in preparation for
amending the Massachusetts Contingency Plan, 310 CMR 40.0000, to establish standards that will
directly affect the notification, assessment, and cleanup of perchlorate-contaminated sites.
Once a reference dose for perchlorate has been identified, regulatory changes will be proposed and
subject to public hearings with a final standard anticipated for late February or early March 2004,
Coletta said.
The agency also plans to initiate the process for establishing a maximum contaminant level (MCL)
for perchlorate, he said. This process will include development of a nonregulatory maximum
contaminant level goal (MCLG), and translation of that goal into a regulatory MCL, establishment of a
monitoring regime and a mechanism to determine compliance, and modification of drinking water
regulations. No date for completion ofthis process has been set, but the process is scheduled to begin
within the next few months:
"While assessment of contaminants without a specific cleanup standard, such as perchlorate, is

required pursuant to the Massachusetts Contingency Plan, specific standards have been found to greatly
streamline the site assessment process," DEP Commissioner Robert W. Golledge Jr. wrote in a letter to
David Rich, superintendent of the Mashpee Water District, one of communities adjacent to the military
reservation
Military Reservation Contaminated.
The military reservation is a 22,000-acre property that is located over a sole-source aquifer that
provides drinking water for 200,000 year-round and 500,000 seasonal residents of Cape Cod. Parts of
the aquifer have been contaminated by fuel spills and other past praetices at the site. Cleanup at the·
reservation, which was placed on the superfund National Priorities List in 1989, is proceeding under
joint oversight by the state and EPA.
Earlier this year, in the wake of the discovery of perchlorate in a private water supply well adjacent to
the federal military facility on Cape Cod, state environmental officials called onJhe federal government
to submit a plan to address the release of the SUbstance.
Romney said Sept. 24 that the establishment of standards for perchlorate would assist in addressing
the contamination found in wells adjacent to the Massachusetts Military Reservation (MMR), citing a
Sept. 19 letter in which the Department of the Army agreed to comply with all applicable, duly
promulgated state regulations including the new cleanup and drinking water standards.
10/6/2005
Page 3 of3
In that letter, Kent Gosner, program manager of the Army Impact Area Groundwater Study Program
Office, said the Army "shares the Bourne Water District's desire for a clear, duly promulgated federal or
state standard for perchlorate."
Gosner further wrote, "If validated water requirements cannot be met due to contamination from the
MMR for which the Army is responsible, and that exceeds applicable and duly promulgated federal or
state regulatory standards, the Army will take timely steps to address the reasonable incremental costs to
develop, treat or otherwise remediate those water supplies that are directly attributable to that
contamination. "
California Also Eyes Standard.
Massachusetts is not the only state that is working on a percWorate standard. California has proposed
a public health goal for perchlorate that ranges from 2 ppb to 6 ppb.
Legislation signed into law in September 2002 required the California Office of Environmental
Health Hazard Assessment to adopt the goal, an unenforceable guideline for water suppliers, by Jan. 1,
2003. The same statute required the Department of Health Services to establish a drinking water
standard for the contaminant a year later.
A lawsuit Lockheed Martin Corp. and Kerr-McGee Chemical LLC filed, however, has delayed the
rulemaking process. In Novembei2002, a state court issued an order requiring the study OEHHA used
to set its draft public health goal to undergo a second peer review (Lockheed Martin Corp. v. OEHHA,
Cal. Super.Ct., Los Angeles Cnty., No. BS-077063, 11/21/02; 228 DEN A-2, 11/26/02).
OEHHA spokesman Allan Hirsch told BNA Sept. 23 the University of California has yet to compete
its review of the report, so it is unlikely the Department of Health Services will have the information it
needs to comply with the Jan. I, 2004 deadline.
by Martha Kessler and Carolyn Whetzel
10/6/2005
1032
JOINT PRESS RELEASE BY
THE U.S. DEPARTMENT 'OF DEFENSE AND
THE U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
ON PERCHLORATE
Common Purpose
The Department of Defense and the Environmental Protection Agency are working together to
defend the Nation, protect the health of the American people, and safeguard our natural
environment. The Department of Energy and NASA have joined this effort to ensure that their
critical programs operate in full accord with these goals. All four agencies are committed at the
highest levels to accomplish these objectives using the best available scientific and technical
information.
Ammonium perchlorate is used as a component of rocket fuel and to power a large number of
military munitions. It is a critical component of the fuel that puts NASA's Space Shuttle in orbit.
Ammonium perchlorate also is used in commercial applications such as fireworks, airbags, road
flares and matches. It has been found in naturally occurring mineral-deposits in some areas of
the world. It also has been a component of some common fertilizers.
Substances that perform this function are called "energetics" because they release huge amounts
of energy when combusted or reacted. Of all the energetic materials that the Department knows
about, perchlorate is by far the safest-safest for the environment, safest for public health in the
event of environmental relea~e or discharge, and safest for the military and civilian personnel
who operate rockets or fire munitions in the field. Without ammonium perchlorate, we could not
accomplish the mission of defending the United States without exposing the people of the United
States and our own personnel to chemicals that have much greater risks to life and health.
Nevertheless, the Department of Defense remains committed to managing any risk that
perchlorate might pose. Toward that end, the Department is working with EPA to determine how
much perchlorate exposure even the most sensitive members of the pubic can experience without
facing any appreciable risks of deleterious effects.
Misperceptions about the Science of Perchlorate Arising from Recent Media Reports
Recent media reports may have led to some confusion or misunderstanding about what is known
about the science ofperchlonite. For instance, despite reports to'the contrary:
• Perchlorate does not cause cancer in animal or man

• Perchlorate does not cause Graves disease, and persons who have Graves disease did not
acquire it from exposure to perchlorate
• Any person who required surgery to treat a thyroid disorder did not acquire that disorder
from perchlorate.
• Perchlorate does not cause hypothyroidism at environmental levels.
• Perchlorate is not an "endocrine disruptor" that mimics a normal hormone.
• Perchlorate is not a persistent bioaccumulative toxin (PBT).
• As environmental phenomena, perchlorate has nothing in common with arsenic or lead.
Finally, no one is known to have become ill from perchlorate in drinking water or working in
factories where it is made.
Additional details on these scientific misunderstandings are provided as an attachment at the end
of this document.
Working Together
Several media reports have stated or implied that the public is or may be exposed to perchlorate
above the U.S. EPA's standard. Some reports have stated that this safety standard is I part per
billion (Ppb) in drinking water. Both statements are incorrect. EPA does not have any finalized
safety standard for perchlorate and it has not proposed to set such a standard. Current EPA
activities have been limited to conducting a comprehensive risk assessment for perchlorate from
which the Agency may derive a "reference dose."
A reference dose is not equivalent to a safety standard. It is defined by EPA as "an estimate (with
uncertainty spanning perhaps an order of magnitude) of a daily exposure to the human population
that is likely to be without appreciable risk of deleterious effects over a lifetime." Exposures at or
below a reference dose are likely to be safe. However, exposures above a reference dose also may be
safe. Reference doses are derived by applying several "uncertainty" or "modifying" factors to the
available scientific infonnation~ Many different values can be valid "reference doses" as long as they
satisfy this definition. Of special interest is the highest value that satisfies the definition, and this
particular value is the most difficult one of all to derive.
Several years ago, DoD,. NASA, EPA, and industry joined forces to fund and implement a
comprehensive and ambitious research agenda to answer key scientific questions about
perchlorate. In excess of $25 million tax dollars has been spent on scientific research and studies
on toxicology, ecosystem impacts, analytic detection methodologies and treatment technologies.
This joint partnership has allowed EPA to generate the data it needs more rapidly and with less
duplication than ever before.
The Future
DoD and EPA are continuing their long-standing cooperation. Scientists and officials from both
organizations are actively discussing how to obtain a disinterested, objective and neutral
interpretation of this increasingly rich database from the Nation's leading scientists. 'Once this
review is completed, EPA can move forward to finish its risk assessment and to provide clear
answers to State and local government leaders, water utility officials and address public concerns
about perchlorate.
Concurrently, DoD has implemented a policy that allows commanders in the field to use
validated test procedures to screen for perchlorate and remediate contamination when a
reasonable basis exists to suspect perchlorate is present at levels that could threaten public
health.
Frequent Misconceptions about the Science of Perchlorate
1. Perchlorate has NOT been shown to cause cancer in animal or man. This is true at any dose
or level of environmental exposure, including therapeutic doses of perchlorate used to
diagnose and treat illness.
2. Perchlorate does NOT cause Graves' disease, and persons who have Graves' disease did NOT
acquire it from exposure to perchlorate.
• What is Graves' disease? Graves' disease is the leading cause of hyperthyroidism in
the United States. It is a defect in the autoimmune system in which antibodies are
produced that attack the thyroid gland. This causes the gland to grow in size and
produce too much thyroid hormone. Similar antibodies may also attack eye muscles
and the skin above the shin.
• Who can get Graves' disease? Adult women are eight times as likely as men to be
affected, though it sometimes occurs in children and the elderly. It can be caused by a
genetic predisposition, stress, infection or pregnancy. It is not contagious.
• How is Graves' disease treated? Graves' disease can be treated by medication to
reduce thyroid hormone production, radioactive iodine, or surgical removal of the
thyroid gland.
• How is perchlorate related to Graves' disease? Years ago in the United States, very
large doses of perchlorate were used as a safe and effective medication. These doses
were about 100,000 times greater than the levels that have been found in drinking
water suppli~s. Other drugs are now preferred, but perchlorate is still used as a
medication in other countries and even in the U.S. for certain conditions.
3. Any person who required surgery to treat a thyroid disorder did NOT acquire that disorder
from perchlorate. At very high doses, perchlorate slows or stops the uptake of iodine into the
thyroid gland. Perchlorate exposure would never cause a person to need surgery, and surgery
would ~ be a medically appropriate remedy for anyone exposed to perchlorate.
4. Perchlorate does not cause disease. Healthy adults exposed to about 100,000 times as much
perchlorate as has been found in drinking water supplies experience reduction in thyroid
hormone output. This is not a disease. Healthy adults exposed to about 15,000 times as
much perchlorate do not experience any change at all in thyroid hormone levels.
5. Perchlorate does not cause hypothyroidism. Hypothyroidism is an autoimmune disorder
different from Graves' disease, this time characterized by too little thyroid hormone rather
than too much. In the United States, there are two predominant causes of hypothyroidism:
• Inflammation ofthe thyroid gland leaving a large percentage of the cells of the
thyroid damaged or dead, and incapable of producing sufficient hormone. The most
common cause of thyroid gland failure is called autoimmune (or Hashimoto's)
thyroiditis. This is caused by the patient's own immune system. "~
• Medical treatments, including surgical removal of a nodule or tumor. Treatment for
Graves' disease (the overproduction of thyroid hormones) often renders the thyroid
gland incapable of producing thyroid hormone.
6. Perchlorate is NOT an "endocrine disruptor" that mimics a normal hormone. Chemicals that
mimic normal hormones are called endocrine disruptors because they interfere with normal
hormone synthesis. Examples of such chemicals may include PCBs and dioxins. Perchlorate
does notmimic a thyroid hormone. At very high doses, it slows or stops the uptake of iodine
into the thyroid gland but it does not alter in any W'irj how the thyroid gland manufactures
thyroid hormones.
Frequent Misperceptions about the Status of
Federal Decision Making Related to Perchlorate
1. EPA has NOT identified safe level of perchlorate exposure. and the Agency is still in the process
of developing such an estimate. Recent reports suggesting that EPA has either set or
recommended an exposure level of 1 part per billion (Ppb) in drinking water are incorrect.
• EPA's scientific efforts have been directed toward deriving a "reference dose." A
"reference dose" is defined as "an estimate (with uncertainty spanning perhaps an order
of magnitude) of a daily exposure to the human population that is likely to be without
appreciable risk of deleterious effects over a lifetime." Exposures at or below a reference
dose are likely to be safe. Exposures above a reference dose also may be safe because
ther~ are a number of uncertainty factors used in establishing a reference dose.
• Many different values can be valid reference doses as long as they satisfy the definition
given above. Of 'special interest is the highest value that satisfies the definition, and it is
most difficult valid reference dose to derive.
• Reference doses are used as points of departure for assessing site-specific risks and for
developing drinking water standards. Many site-specific risk assessments conclude that
exposures above a reference dose are safe. Many drinking water standards are set at
levels which exceed reference doses.
• The normal unit for a "reference dose" is milligrams per kilogram of body weight per
day (mg/kg-day). To convert a reference dose into a drinking water concentration, a
reference dose is multiplied by a factor containing the weight of a reference person, the
amount of drinking water consumed per day, and the proportion of total exposure
expected via drinking water.
• The 1 ppb value that has been cited in various media reports is calculated from the
second external review draft of a risk assessment prepared by EPA's National Center for
Environmental Assessment (NCEA). This draft was distributed in January 2002 prior to
its evaluation by an external peer review panel. NCEA is evaluating the report of that
panel as well as extensive public comments as it works toward finalizing this risk
assessment.
• After NCEA finalizes its risk assessment EPA will convene an internal review process to
derive a consensus scientific opinion across various Agency offices. Until that time, no
consensus EPA position exists.
2. The widely-cited figure of'l ppb is NOT an EPA approved. recommended or required cleanup
level for perchlorate that has been released into the environment.
• EPA does not have any regulatory standard for perchlorate. Some States have
established standards of their own, however, and EPA's latest draft risk assessment has
been cited by some States as a rationale for their standards. EPA does not encourage
States to do this, and specifically recommended on each page of the text that it should be
neither quoted nor cited as an authority for regulatory action.
• By law, DoD cannot spend resources to remedy environmental contamination for which
no regulatory standard exists. Nevertheless, DoD recognizes the need to clean up certain
properties and thus is very interested in developing a standard that fully protects public
health and the environment.
• Toward that end, DoD has contributed millions of dollars toward research in analytic
chemistry, basic sciences, risk assessment and the development of remediation
technology. Indeed, if it were not for DoD's research efforts the public would be
unaware that perchlorate was present in source waters at levels of current public concern
and scientific interest.
-- 30 -
L
1
Rocket fuel contaminates parts of Redstone.Arsenal
Martin Burkey
The Decatur Daily (AL)
6 May 2004
HUNTSVILLE - Redstone Arsenal requested $200,000 from the Army to clean
up rocket fuel contamination, but a spokesman said the chemical hasn't
harmed the drinking-water supplies of Huntsville, Decatur or the other
communities surrounding the 38,OOO-acre Army base.
The Pentagon missed a deadline last week for sending Congress a report
on contamination by a toxic chemical at defense sites nationwide.
Perchlorate, an ingredient in rocket fuel, has been found in drinking
water supplies in 22 states where it was manufactured and handled. It
has been linked to-damage to the thyroid and may be especially harmful
to infants.
Redstone began investigating perchlorate contamination when it was first
mentioned as an environmental contaminant in 1998, arsenal spokesman Pam
Rogers said.
"Before that we did not know about the possibility of perchlorate as a
contaminant on Redstone," she said.
No substitute
Perchlorate is a solid salt easily dissolved in water, which can be used
in airbags, flares, matches, fireworks and explosives, in addition to
rocket fuel. There currently is no substitute for it in rocket fuel.
Rocket testing doesn't release an "appreciable" amount of perchlorate
because it is oxidized in_the process, Rogers said.
Sampling technology wasn't fully developed in 1998, she said. The first
samples were collected and tested in 2000. Redstone announced the
results of preliminary testing in July 2000 at a public meeting.
Perchlorate contamination was found in three areas: the former Redstone

Arsenal Rocket Engine facility on the east side of the arsenal, also
site of a former Thiokol rocket motor manufacturing plant; an open
burn/detonation area on the south part of the arsenal; and several
rocket engine test stands now owned by NASA's Marshall Space Flight
Center.
Contamination varies
The level of contamination ranges from 220,000 parts per billion in the
contaminated areas to undetectable at test wells located off the
arsenal, Rogers said.
"At the point of contamination, we have some high numbers, but they drop
off very quickly," she said. "We have 151 wells we're testing. Only 31
have detectable levels. The maximum we found in an unnamed stream'that
runs along our boundary is 59 parts per billion."
Redstone scientists investigated some possible solutions. The Arsenal

requested $200,000 for a "treatability, study" next year that would test
whether anaerobic bacteria could be used to eat the perchlorate, Rogers
said.
Perchlorate has been detected in groundwater and the underground

aquifers around the arsenal, but not in the drinking water of the area,
Rogers said. Both Huntsville and Decatur draw their drinking water from
the Tennessee River. Officials don't know of any evidence that the
chemical has gotten into humans or animals, she said.
2
~erchlorate is nO longer released into the environment, Rogers said. The
Thiokol plant opened in.1949 and closed in 1995.
The.April 30 deadline for a report on perchlorate contamination was
contained in a military construction bill passed la$t year.
California Sen. Dianne 'ein.tein, senior Democrat ac the appropriations
subcommittee that handles military construction. oOmplained to Defense
Se~retary Donald Rumafeld abou~ mi•• ing the deadline.
The Environmental Protection Agency is .working on its fir$t national

standard for perohlorate in drinking water but is not expected to issue
a final standard until 2006.
California officials last month set the state's public health goal at
six puts per bj,llion - the first such level set in the oountry for the
toxin. BPAls draft proposal is stricter - one part per billion.
Report request
Lawmakers have been seeking a oomprehensive report on perchlorate from
the Defense Department for more than a year. Last year they received
what they described as a sketchy, bewildering document in whioh
officials surveyed 305 of the nation's 5,000 former and active military
baSeS.
Demoorats complained the Pentagon is resisting full disclosure because
it could face billions of dOllars in cleanup costs and liability for
health p~oblems.
Daniel Kowalczyk
Booz ~llen Hamilton
8283 Greensboro Dr
McLean, VA 22102
(ph)
(fax)
Regulatory
Service I Facility I Site I

Source of Perchlorate (Operations.
Equipment. Activities) I
Location
Detected
(Media)
I I I
Number of Number of Range
Detections Samples Concentratoons
Collected Detected (ppb)
~f I I.Analytical
Interest (Cleanup
reques~ed.
Method PotentIal Pathway(s) of Exposure per~itllng
reqUIrements,
I Funding Type
sampling
requirements)
I I I I
Navy I Marine Corpe Pere:hlorate Survey· Environmental Restoration· Cleanup, Other

I I I I I I
Research. Development, Test and None. Groundwater is unlikely to
Navy' lALLEGANYBALLlSTICS ISft 1'1EWOS Evaluation; Marofacturing; disposal of Groundwater 2 2 14.0 - 76.2 EPA 314 dveloped for drinking water, and IFederal; State DERP
Marine Corps LABORATORY e . I
waste product use is controlled by property owner.
\
IResearCh, Development, Test and None. Groundwater is unlikely to
Navy' IALLEGANY BALLISTICS
ISfte 1: 1EWfO Evaluation; Manufacturing; disposal of Groundwater 4 4 f48.0 - 329.0 EPA3f4 dveloped for drinking water, and IFederal; State I DERP
Marine Corps LABORATORY
Research, Development, Test and None. Groundwater is unlikely to

:''7~ Cor 1~~:~~~~LLlSTICS ISfte 1: 1EW12 IEvaluation; Manufacturing; disposal of Groundwater 3 3 315.0 - 5,910.0 EPA 314 dveloped for drinking water, and IFederal; State I DERP
ps lwaste product use is controlled by property owner.
Navy' /ALLEGANY BALLISTICS

I
Research, Development, Test and
ISfte 1: 1EW14 Evaluation; Manufacturing; disposal of
lwaste product
Groundwater 4 4 626.0 - 7,930.0
None. Groundwater is unlikely to
EPA3f4 dveloped for drinking water, and IFederal; State
use is controlled by property owner.
I DERP

I
ISfte 1: 1EW16 Evaluation; Manufacturing; disposal of Groundwater 7 7 3,500.0 - 34,900.0
EPA 314 dveloped for drinking water, and IFederal; State I DERP

ISfte1: 1EW18 IEvaluation; Manufacturing; disposal of Groundwater 4 4 34.2 -72.0 EPA 314 dveloped for drinking water, and IFederal; State I DERP

ISfte1: 1EW21 IEvaluation; Manufacturing; disposal of Groundwater 1 2 ND -8.9' EPA 314 dveloped for drinking water, and IFederal; State I DERP

I
\Sfte1: 1EW3O Evaluation; Manufacturing; disposal of
waste product
Groundwater 4 4 190.0 - f,110.0
EPA 314 dveloped for drinking water, and IFederal; State
use is controlled by property owner.
I DERP
(esearch' DevelOpment, Test and None. Groundwater is unlikely to

ISfte 1:1EW31 Evaluation; Manufacturing; disposal of Groundwater 3 3 14.0 -50.0 EPA 314 dveloped for drinking water, and IFederal; State I DERP
Sfte 1: Research, Development, T~t and None. Groundwater is unlikely to

11Groundwater10 IEvaluallon; ManufacturIng; dIsposal of Groundwater 1 1 26.7 EPA 314 dveloped for drinking water, and IFederal; State I DERP
Navy'
I
IALLEGANY BALLISTICS Sfte 1: (esear~h, Developmer:rt, T ~ and
fGroundwater11 EvaluatlOl1; ManufacturIng; dIsposal of Groundwater 6 6 7.5 - 55.0
EPA 314 dveloped for drinking water, and IFederal; State I DERP
Fie: PercData_A1ISvcs_May6_
Sheet: Env Restoration-Cleanup, Other , Method 314 reporting limft is 4 ppb Page 1 of 75
Regulatory

Location
Detected
(Media)
I I I I I
Number of Number of Range of
Detections Samples Concentrations
Analytical
Interest (Cleanup
requested,
Method Potential Pathway(s) of Exposure permitting
requirements,
I Funding Type
sampling
requirements)
Navy' IALLEGANY BALLISTICS S~e 1:

I researCh, Development, Test and
lGroundwater32 Evaluation; ManufactUring; disposal of Groundwater 4 4 14.6 - 33.0
None. Groundwater is unlikely to be
EPA 314 dvelo~ for drinking water, and Federal; State I DERP'
waste product use is 'controlled by property owner.
IResearch, Development, Test and

Navy' IALLEGANY BALLISTICS ISite 1: ASOl-
Marine Corps LABORATORY SB03
Evaluation; Manufacturing; disposal of Soil 1 1 68.0 EPA 314 None. IFederal; State I DERP
Navy' IALLEGANY BALLISTICS Is~e 1: AS01

Iwaste product
Evaluation; Manufacturing; disposal of ISoU I 1 I 1 I 960 I EPA 314 INone IFederal; SIale I DERP
waste product
research, Development, Test and
Evaluation; Manufacturing; disposal of ISoil I 1 I 1 I 880.0 I EPA 314 INone IFederal; Stale I DERP
Navy' IALLEGANY BALLISTICS Is~e 1: ASOl-

Iwaste product
Research. Development, Test and
Evaluation; Manufacturing; disposal of ISoU I 1 I 1 I 95.0 I EPA 314 INone IFederal; Stale I DERP
waste product
Navy' IALLEGANY BALLISTICS ISite 1: AS01

I
Research. Development, Test and
Evaluation; Manufacturing; disposal of ISou I 1 I 1 I 120.0 I EPA 314 INone IFederal; Stale I DERP
waste product
IResearch, Development. Test and
Navy' IALLEGANY BALLISTICS I~e 1: AS01
Evaluation; Manufacturing; disposal of ISoU I 1 I 1 I 62.0 I EPA 314 INane IFederal; State I DERP
waste product
IResearch, Development, Tesl and
Evaluation; ManufactUring; disposal of ISoil I 2 I 2 I 220.0 - 2,500.0 I EPA 314 INone IFederal; Slate I DERP
waste product
Navy'
31
I
IALLEGANY BALLISTICS S~e 12: AOCN- researCh, Development, Tesl and
Evaluation; Manufacturing; disposal of Groundwaler 1 1 16.0
None. Groundwaler is unlikely to
EPA 314 dveloped for drinking waler, and IFederal; Slale I DERP
waste product use is controned by property owner.
IALLEGANY BALLISTICS Is~e 12: AOCN- reSearCh. Developme~, Test and

NIfiY'
Marine Corps LABORATORY 33 Eva1uallon; Manufactunng; dIsposal of Groundwaler 1 1 49.0 EPA 314 dve/oped for drinking waler, and IFederal; State I DERP
Navy' IALLEGANY BALLISTICS Isue 12: AS12

I
Research, DeVelopment, Test and
Evaluation; Manufacturing; disposal of Groundwater 1 1 13.0
None. Groundwaler is unlikely 10
I
EPA 314 dveloped for drinking water, and Federal; Slate I DERP
Marine Corps LABORATORY 12MWOS
wasle product use is controlled by property owner.
Research, Development, Test and None. Groundwater is unlikely 10

Navy' ALLEGANY BALLISTICS S~e 2:
Evaluation; Manufacturing; disposal of Groundwater 1 1 10.6 EPA 314 dveloped for drinking water, and IFederal; Stale I DERP
IMarine Corps LABORATORY 2Groundwaler02
Navy'
CORONADO NAYBASE NASNIIR SUe 9 Demil~arizationlDisposal Groundwater 0 5 ND EPA 314 None State DERP
Marine Corps
Sampled with FY
Navy' CRANE Navy Surface
Old Jeep Traft DemilUarizationlDisposal Sol 5 5 24.0 -470.0 EPA 314 None Federal 2001 DERP
Marine Corps Water Center
funding
File: PercData_A1ISvcs_May6_
Sheet: Env Restoratior>-Cleanup, Other • Method 314 repor1ing lim~ is 4 ppb Page 2 of 75
Regulatory

Source of Perchlorate (Operations,
Equipment, Activities) I
location
Detected
(Media)
I I I I I
Number of Number of Range ~f
Analytical I
requested,
Method Potential Pathway(s) of Exposure permilling
Intereat (Cleanup
requirements,
I Funding Type
sampling
requirements)
I I
Navy , ;I~ROWS LANDING
Marine Corps FLIGHT FACILITY
Sne 11 Disposal
Pijs
DemUnarizaiioniDisposal Groundwater 0 11 ND EPA 314 INone I State I BRAC
I I CADHS
Cl04METH; ISource: Production Wells Media
I
None identifl9d. Basewide groundwater
Navy' rormer Marine Corps Air IEIToro
Marine Corps Station, EI Toro Basewide
lconsistent with off-station groundwater
concentrations
Groundwater 73
\I I 188 ND -16.0·
Cl04METH; Exposure: Groundwater Human
EPA 300.0; Receptor. Production Well
EPA 314; Consumer
IFederal; State I BRAC
EPAM3oo.0
None identifl9d: Basewide groundwater

Navy' IFormer Marine Corps Air EIToro EPA 314 INone
Marine Corps Station, EI Toro Basewide
consistent with off-station groundwater ND IFederal; State I BRAC
concentrations
Navy' Former Marine Corps Air

Marine Corps Station, EI Toro
Anomaly Area 3 Perchlorate not detected at the sne. ND None IFederal; State I BRAC
Source: Potential Production Well

Media of Exposure: Shallow
CADHS
Navy' rormer Marine Corps Air

IIRPsne2 ISite is a landfdl. I
Groundwater
I I I 118 217 ND - 20.7· ICl04METH' Groundwater Human Receptor:
Cl04METH: Pot.e~ial Water Consumer. It ~ t IFederal; Stale
EPA 314' antICipated that groundwater wnhln
r:o I BRAC
EPA M300 0 the sne boundary witl be used for

. benefICial in the foreseeable future.
SoD contamination could potentially

leach into groundwater. Shallow
Navy' I
Former Marine Corps Air
IIRP Sne 1 ITraining; DemOnarizationiDisposai [SOD
I
4
I 85
I
ND - 320.0· ICl04METH; IGroundwater could be used for
EPA 300.0; drinking water. It is not anticipated IFederal; State I BRAC
EPA 314 that groundwater within the sne
boundary will be used for benefICial
use in the foreseeable future.
Source: Potential Production We/I

Media of Exposure: Shallow
CADHS
Groundwater
Navy' I
Former Marine Corps Air
IIRPsne 1 ITraining; DemiinarizationlDisposal I
Groundwater
I I I 52 106 ND - 398.0·
Cl04METH;
ICl04METH;
EPA 300.0;
Human Receptor: Potential Water
Consumer. IFederal; State I BRAC
It isnot anticipated that
EPA 314;
groundwater within the site
EPAM3oo.0
boundary will be used for benefICial
use in the foreseeable future.
Groundwater discharges to In-snu

Navy , Ilndian Head SurfalCe Maltawoman Creek. Recreational bioremedialion
DemiinarizationiDisposal 5.0 - 276,000.0 None
. ,Marine Corps Warfare Center users of the creek could potentially fteld
be exposed. demonstration
File: PercData_AIISvcs_May6_
Sheet: Env Restoration-Cleanup, Other • Method 314 reporting fimn is 4 ppb

Page 30f75
Regulatory

location
Detected
(Media)
I I I I c: I
Num~r of Number of Range of
Samples Concentrations
Detections Collected Detected (ppb)
~a ~
A I I I
et 0
Interest (Cleanup
requested,
Potential Pathway(s) of Exposure permitting
requirements,
I Funding Type
sampling
requirements)
I I I I I I I I
Navy! Indian Head Surface
Marine Corps Warfare center
I Maltawoman
Creek
I None I Surface Water 1 0
-r 34 1 NO 1 EPA 314 lNone Federal I DERP

INanjemoy Creek INone ISurface Water I 0 I 2 I NO I EPA 314 INone I Federal I DERP
Navy! Indian Head Surface \

ISfte 12 INone IGroundwater I 0 I 7 I NO I EPA300 INone I Federal I OERP

ISfte28 INone ISediment I 0 I 10 I . NO I EPA 314 INone I.Federal I OERP

ISfte28 INone 150ft I 0 I 86 I NO I EPA 314 INane IFederal I DERP

ISfte28 INane IGroundwater I 0 I 22 I NO I EPA 314 INone I Federal I OERP

ISile28 INone ISurface Water I 0 I 4 I NO I EPA 314 INane IFederal I OERP
Navy!
Indian Head Surface
Sfte39 None Soft 0 47 NO EPA 314 INane IFederal I OERP
Marine Corps
Warfare center
Navy!
Indian Head Surface IClGP
Sile41 None Groundwater 0 4 NO INone IFederal I OERP
Marine Corps
Warfare Center Method
Navy!
Indian Head Surface IC!GP
Sfte44 None Groundwater 0 1 NO INane IFederal I OERP
Marine Corps
Warfare center Method
Navy!
tndian Head Surface
ISfte45 INane ISediment I 0 I 5 I NO I EPA 314 INane IFederal I OERP

ISile45 INane ISoil I /0 I 11 I NO I EPA 314 INone IFederal I OERP

Marine Corps Warfare Center
ISfte45 INane IGroundwater I 0 I 5 I NO I EPA 314 INane IFederal I DERP

ISile45 INane ISurface Water I 0 I 3 I NO I EPA 314 INane IFederal I DERP

ISfte47 INone ISediment I 0 I 2 I NO I EPA 314 INane IFederal I OERP

ISfte47 INone ISoH I 0 I 10 I NO I EPA 314 INone IFederal I DERP
Ffte: PercOata_A1ISvcs_May6_
Sheet Env Restoration-Cleanup, Other • Method 314 reporting limit is 4 ppb Page 4 of 75
Regulatory

Location
Detected
(Media)
I I I I I
Analytical
Method Potential Pathway(s) of Exposure ~itling
Interest (Cleanup
requested,
requirements,
I Funding Type
sampling
requirements)
NfNY/ Indian Head Surface

ISRe 47 INane I
Groundwater
I 0
I
16
I NO 1300'~N314 one I
Federal I OERP
Navy/ Indian Head Surface

ISRe47 INane (Surface Water I 0 I 3 I NO I EPA 314 INane (Federal I OERP

MarineCorps Warfare Center
ISRe53 INone ISediment I 0 I 16 I NO I EPA 314 INone IFederal I OERP

None NO EPA 314 INone IFederal I OERP
Navy / Iindian Head Surface

ISATTP MW-Dl IS~rt X Open Bum Thermal Treatment
Interim Status ISoil I 2
I
2
I IE:~t=~e Potential exposure to recreational
Method users of the Matta~man Creek.
921.0 - 11,600.0 8321a(modifi through soi contamInation leachIng State
ed) IC to groundwater, and groundwater
I I O&M or Defense
Working CapRal
Fund
LClM; discharges to the creek.
I I
Potential exposure to recreational I I O&M or Defense
ISATTP MW-Dl Subpart X Open Burn Thermal Treatment
Interom Status
Groundwater
I I I 2 8 NO> - 35.4
I EPA 314 users of the Mattawoman Creek St t
through groundwater discharges to a e
the creek.
Working Capital
Fund
Navy / IIOOlan Head Surface

ISATTP MW-D2 I~UbJ.lSrt X Open Bum Thermal Treatment
Interim status [Soi
I
2
I I 2 776.0 - 4,710.0
EPA Surface
IWater-846
Potential exposure to recreational
users of the Mattawoman Creek
Method through soil contamination leaching State
8321a(modifi
I I O&M or Defense
Working CapRal
to groundwater, and groundwater Fund
ed) IC or
discharges to the creek.
LCIMS
I
Potential exposure to recreational I I O&M or Defense
ISATTP MW-D2 ISUbpart X Open Bum Thermal Treatment Groundwater
lrJ\arom status I I I 1 7 NO> - 25.1
I EPA 314
users of the Mallawoman Creek Stat
through groundwater discharges to
the creek.
e
Working CapRal
Fund
NfNY / Iindian Head Surface

ISATTP MW-D3 I~Ubpart X Open Bum Thermal Treatment
Interom status ISoi
I
3
I I
3 258.0 - 6230
EPA Surface
I
Water-846
users of the Mattawoman Creek
8321a(modifi
I I O&M or Oefense
Working CapRaI
ed) IC or
LCIMS
Navy / IIndian Head Surface

Subpart X Open Bum Thermal Treatment
interim status
NO> - 463.0
EPA 314 users of Mallawoman Creek 1St t
through groundwater discharges to a e
I O&M or Defense
Working CapRal
Fund
the creek.
Fie: PercOataflISvcs_May6_
Sheet: Env Restoration-Cleanup, Other >Method 314 reporting limR is 4 ppb Page 5 of 75
Regulatory
Interest (Cleanup
Location Number of Range of requested.
Source of Perchlorate (Operations, Number of Analytical
service Facility Site Detected Samples Concentrations Potential Pathway(s) of Exposurel permitting Funding Type
Equipment, Activities) Detections Method
(Media) Collected Detected (ppb) requirements,
sampling
requirements)
EPA Surface
Water-846 Potential exposure to recreational
Navy I IIndian Head Surface
SATTP MW..()4 ISubpart X Open Burn Thermal Treatment
interim status
SoH 3 3
30.400.0 _54.400.01 Method users of the Maltawoman Creek
8321 a(modifi through soH contamination leaching I State
O&M or Defense
Working Capijal
ad) IC or to groundwater. and groundwater Fund
LCiMS discharges to the creek.

SATTP MW..()4 I Subpart X Open Burn Thermal Treatment
interim status ,
Groundwater 7 NO" -763.0 EPA 314
users ofthe Mat1awoman Creek
Stale
O&M or Defense
Working Capijal
Fund
the creek.
EPA Surface
SATTP MW-D5 ISubpart X Open Burn Thermal Treatment
interim status
SoH 2 2
27.500.0 _40.000.01 Method users of the Maltawoman Creek
8321 a(modifi through soil contamination leaching 1State
O&M or Defense
Working Capijal

SATTP MW-D5 ISubpart X Open Burn Thermal Treatment
interim status
Groundwater 3 8 NO" -179.0 EPA 314
users of the Mat1awoman Creek
State
O&M or Defense
Working Capijal
Fund
the creek.
EPA Surface
Method users of the Maltawoman Creek O&M or Defense
Navy I [Indian Head Surface SATTP MW-D6 ISubpart X Open Burn Thermal Treatment
Soil 2 2 58.2 - 98.2 8321a(modifi through SOIl contamina1ion leaching IState Working C8pijal
Marine Corps Warfare center interim status
O&M or Defense
Navy I I'ndian Head Surface Subpart X Open Burn Thermal Treatment
SATTPMW-D6
interim status
Groundwater o 7 NO EPA 314 None State Working Capijal
Fund
EPA Surface
SATTPMW-D7
Subpart X Open Burn Thermal Treatment
interim status
SoH 2 NO -79.6
Method users of the Maltawoman Creek
8321a(modifi through soH contamination leaching IState
O&M or Oefense
Working C8pijal

SATTPMW-D7
interim status
Groundwater o 8 NO EPA 314 None Stale
O&M or Defense
Working Capijal
Fund
FDa: PercOata_A1ISvcs_May6_
Sheet: Env Restoration-Cleanup, Other " Method 314 reporting Iimij is 4 ppb Page 6 of 75
Regulatory

Location
Detected
(Media)
I I I
Num~r 0 f
DetectIons
Number of Range of
samples Concentrations
I I A Iyf I IInterest (Cleanup
requested,
;a h: Potential Pathway(s) of Exposure permitting
et requirements,
I Funding TVpe
sampling
Irequirements)

I Isubpart X Open Burn Thermal Treatment
SATTP MW-D8 interim status ISoil
I I I
1 2 ND-62.0
EPA Surface
I
Water-846
users bf the Mattawoman Creek I I


8321a(modifi
O&M or Defense
Working cap~af
ed) IC or
LCIMS
Navy I I
Indian Head Surface

I I
Subpart X Open Bum Thermal Treatment
SATTP MW~8 interim status Groundwater I I I I
0 8 NO
I EPA 314 None State
O&M or Defense
Working Cap~al
Fund
EPA Surface
Navy I I
Indian Head Surface

I ISUbpart X Open Burn Thermal Treatment
SATTP MW~ interim status Iso~ I I I
0 2 NO
Water-846
183~~ifiINone I State
I O&M or Defense
Working Capital
Fund
ed) IC or
LCiMS
Navy I I
Indian Head Surface

I I
SATTP MW~ interim status Groundwater I I I I
0 7 NO
O&M or Defense
Working cap~al
Fund
EPA Surface
Navy I I
Indian Head Surface

ISATTP MW-1
I
0 Subpart X Open Burn Thermal Treatment
interim status I
Soil
I 3
I
3
I
243.0 - 645.0 IWater-846
users of the Maltawoman Creek I
8321a(modifi
I
O&M or Defense
Working capftal
ed) ICor
LCIMS
Navy I 'I
Indian Head Surface
I I
SATTP MW-10 interim status I
Groundwater
I
0
I I 7 NO
O&M or Defense
Working Capftal
Fund
I I I I I I O&M or Defense
Navy I Indian Head Surface
Potable Well #151 There is None. Drinking Water
I I 0 1
I
NO EPA300M [None None Working Capftal
Fund
---
I I I I I IO&M or Defense
Navy I ndian Head Surface
Potable Well
#16a
IThere is None. Drinking Water
I I I 0 1 NO EPA300M INone None Working Capital
Fund
----
Indian Head Surface O&M or Defense
Navy I Potable Well
There is None. Drinking Water 0 1 NO EPA300M None None Working capftal
Marine Corps Warfare Center #2012
Fund

Sfte 11 Unknown Other 2 2 NO EPA 314 None Federal DERP
F~e: PercData_AnSvcs_May6_
Sheet: Env Restoratioll-Cleanup, Other • Method 314 reporting lim~ is 4 ppb Page 7 of75
Regulatory

Equipment, A.ctivities) I
Location
Detected
(Media)
I I"m",~ I . . . I I
Number of
Detections Samples
Collected
of
Concentrations
Detected (ppb)
A.nalytical
r-~com.. I
reques •
requirements,
Funding Type
sampling
requirements)
I
I
I I
Potential exposure to So~ for
constrlJction workers, maintenance
ISfte 11 Unknown lS9diment
I I I 7 8 NO" - 230.0
I EPA 314 workers or trespassers. Potential IFederal
exposure to surface water and
I OERP
sediment for recreational users.
Groundwater recharges into surface

Navy I \ Indian Head Surface
Marine Corps Warfare Center ISite 11 I
Unknown IGrOUndwater
I I I. 11 15 NO" - 4.0
I EPA 314 lwater. Potential exposure to surfacelFed I
water and sediment for recreational era
users.
I OERP
--
I
I I
Potential exposure to So~ for
construction workers, maintenance
ISfte 11 Unknown /Surface Water
I I I 7 11 NO" - 4.0
I EPA 314 workers or trespassers. Potential IFederal
exposure to surface water and
I OERP
sediment for recreational users.
I
I I I
Potential exposure to Soil for
\Sfte 11 !unknown SoH
I 45
/
66 NO" - 480,000.0
I
EPA 314 construction workers, maintenance (Federal
workers or trespassers.
I OERP
Navy I I
Indian Head Surface

Marine Corps Warfare Center ISite 17 IUnknown Isurface Water
I I I
7 7 4.0
I
rotential exposure to surface water
EPA 314 and sediment for recreational IFederal I OERP
I
I users.
Potential exposure to surface water
ISite 17 IUnknown \Sediment
I I I 6 6 86.0 - 160.0
I EPA 314 and sediment for recreational
users.
IFederal I OERP

Site 17 Unknown SoH 24 35 NO" - 130.0
Potential exposure to Soil for
EPA 314 construction workers, maintenance I Federal

I OERP'
workers or trespassers.
Navy I sl,lndian Head Surface

Site 17 Unknown Groundwater 0 8 NO EPA 314 None (Federal I OERP
I
I IIndividuals (construction worker)
that corne in contact wfth

Marine Corps Wanare Center ISfte21 /unknown Soil
I I I 23 30 NO" -130.0
I EPA 314 subsurface Soil or groundwater at I Federal
this sfte could potentially be
I OERP
exposed.
Individuals (construction worker)
Navy I Iindian Head Surface

!Sfte21 Iunknown I
Groundwater
I I I 20 23 NO" - 2,900.0
I
rhat come in contact wfth
EPA 314 subsurface Soil or groundwater at IFederal
this sfte could potentially be
I OERP
exposed.
File: PercOata~USvcs_May6_
Sheet: Env Restoration-Cleanup, Other • Method 314 reporting limft is 4 ppb Page 8 ot 75
Regulatory

Location
Detected
(Media)
I I I
N be of Number of
D~:'ti~ns
Range of
I I A Iyt" I
~:th:.a
Interest (Cleanup
requested,
Potential Pathway(s) of Exposure per~ilting
reqUirements,
I Funding Type
sampling
In.___
requirements)
I
~·

Is~e42 !Unknown IGroundwater
I I I 9 15 NO' -4.0
I
EPA 314;
EPA300;
IC/GP
stream south of the s~e. Potential
exposures by trespassers and IFederal I DERP
maintenance personnel digging at
Method
the s~e.
I I I I , I
The groundwater discharges to a
stream south of the site. Potential
Marine Corps Warfare Center Site 42 Unknown SoU
I 10
\
12
I NO' - 88.2
I EPA 314 exposures by trespassers and
maintenance personnel digging at
IFederal I DERP
the s~e,

Marine Corps Warfare Center \Site 57 Unknown Groundwater 1 6 NO -8.8
IClGP-
Method
Potential exposures by recreational
users from groundwater discharges IFederal I DERP
to the Mallawoman Creek.
I IBill Machen
Navy I Marine Corps Air Station, Source Water, Colorado River Background Levels
Marine Corps Yuma
Chocolate
Mountains
Drinking Water 1 1 4.2 EPA 314
Source water to drinking water
system. I None
1O&M or Defense
Working Capital
Fund
Range
Navy I IMarine Corps Air Station,

Marine Corps Yuma
Cannon Air
Defense
leompfex Water No perchlorate was found Drinking Water 0 1 NO EPA 314 None None
I O&M or Defense
Working Capital
System Source Fund
Water
To Conform W~h
I
The 29
I I I
I I
lSeptember 2003\ O&M or Defense
Navy I Marine Corps Air Station, Barry M. Department Of Work' Ca ~ I
Marine Corps Yuma
Goldwater, Pistol OperatiOnal Testing
Range
IGroundwater 0
I I 2 NO EPA 314 None Defense Intermin
Policy On
Perchlorate
.ng p a
Fund
sampling
---
To Conform With
I I I IThe 29
I I
September 2003 O&M or Defense
I I I
Navy I Marine Corps Air Station, \Barry M. Department Of . .
Goldwater, Operational Testing 1 NO EPA 314 None
Marine Corps Yuma Groundwater 0 Defense Intarmin work~~ap~1
Tracker Building
Policy On
1 u
Perchlorate
Sampling
Fie: PercData_AI1Svcs_May6_
Sheet: Env Restoration-Cleanup, Other , Method 314 reporting limit is 4 ppb Page 9 of 75
Regulatory

Equipment, Activtties) I
Location
Detected
(Media)
I I INumber of Number of Range o.f
I I Analytical
Method Potential Pathway(s) of Exposure ~illing
Interest (Cleanup
requested,
reqUirements,
I Funding Type
sampling
requirements)
To Conform Wnh
The 29
Navy I I
Marine Corps Yuma
Camp Burt 2,
Marine Corps Air Station, IEastern
Chocolate
Operational Testing Soi 0 7 NO EPA 314 None
september 2003 O&M or Defense
Department Of W k' Ca ilaI
Defense Intermin or ~nd P
Montains Policy On 1u
Perchlorate
Sampling
---
To Conform Wnh
The 29
I I I I I
Due to the highly soIubilny of September 2003 O&M or Defense
IMarine Corps Air Station, Beckett ~ouse, Supplied from Colorado River which has a Groundwater
Navy I
Marine Corps Yuma Up-Gradl3nl background level of 4-5 ppb. I I I 2 2 3.3 - 3.5*
EPA 314 perchlorate, the most like route of
'<MRL human exposure is through
consumtion of Groundwater.
Department Of W k' Capital
Defense Intermin or ~nd
Policy On 1 u
Perchlorate
Sampling
I

Marine Corps Yuma
IMCASMain
Iwater System
Supplied from Colorado River which has a
Background Level of 4-5 ppb.
Surface Water 1 1 4.6
The sample tested was the source
EPA 314 water supply to the Water None
O&M or Defense
Working Capital
Source Water Treatment Plant. Fund
To Conform Wnh
The 29

Marine Corps Yuma
IBarryM.
Goldwater
Auxiliary II
/Training I I I I I I
Soil 1 2 NO' - 34.6 EPA 314
Due to the high solubnny of
perchlorate, the most likely route of
human exposure is through
consumtion of Groundwater.
september 2003 O&M or Defense
Department Of W k' Ca nat
Del Int·
ense erm'n
Policy On
or 'ng p
F nd
1 u
Perchlorate
Sampling
To Conform Wnh
The 29
CampBil
Navy I I
Marine Corps Yuma
I
Marine Corps Air Station, Machen,
Western Training Sol 0 6 NO EPA 314 None
September 2003 O&M or Defense
Department Of W k' Ca n I
Defense Intermin or ~nd P a
ChocOlaie
Policy On 1 u
Mountains
Perchlorate
Sampling
--
To Conform wnh
The 29
Camp Burt 1, September 2003 O&M Def
Navy I IMarine Corps Air Station, IEastern o part en! Of or ense
Marine Corps Yuma Chocolate
Training Sol 0 9 NO EPA 314 None O:fens: Intermin work~
,.,;apnal
Mountains Policy On 1 u
Perchlorate
Sampling
I I I I I I I I I
File: PercOata_AUSvcs_May6_
Sheet: Env Restoration-Cleanup, Other ' Method 314 reporting limn is 4 ppb Page 10 of 75
Regulatory

Location
Detected
(Media)
I I I
I I.Analytical
Interest (Cleanup
requested,
Method Potential Pathway(s) of Exposure per~itting
requirements,
I Funding Type
sampling
requirements)
----
To Conform WKh
The 29
Navy , I
Marine Corps Yuma
I
Camp David,
Marine Corps Air Station, Western
Chocolate
Training Soi 0 7 NO EPA 314 None
September 2003 0&1.1 or Defense
Department Of .
Del Int . WorkIng CapMI
ense ermlll F nd
.
Perchlorate
Sampling
To Conform WKh
The 29
Navy' I
Marine Corps Yuma
I
Iris Wash,
Marine Corps Air Station, Western
Chocolate
Training So~ 0 2 NO EPA 314 None
September 2003 0&1.1 or Defense
Department Of W k' C . I
oefanse Int·
ermln or mg
F nd apM
Perchlorate
Sampling
-
To Conform WKh
The 29
Navy' IMarine Corps Air Slation, IYodaVille, Barry IT ..

Marine Corps Yuma M. Goldwater raining I Soil
I I I 1 10 NO' - 93.9
I I EPA 314
Due to the high solubftity of
human exposure is through

September 2003\ 0&1.1 or Defense
perchlorate, the most likely route of Department Of World ca' MI
Defense tntermin ~nd P
consumption of Groundwater. Policy On u
Perchlorate
Sampling
I
Marine Training
I
Navy , I
Marine Corps Yuma
I
Range SootOOle
Marine Corps Air Station, Located On The
Barry M.
Training; DemftKarizationlDisposal Soft 1 1 150.0 EPA 314

Due to the high soIubilily of
perchlorate, the most likely route of IN
human exposure is through one
10&1.1 or Defense
Working CapKal
Fund
Goldwater
consumption of Groundwater.
Range
Methods
Navy' I
Marine Corps NAS South Weymouth
IWest Gate
Landfill
I Source is unknown. I Groundwater
I I I 0 10 NO I 3oo.0amnd
350.2; IN
Methods one IFederal; State I BRAC
300.0 and
350.2
I
Detections located at Nomans Land
Island which is located about 3
Navy'
Manne Corps
INAS South Weymouth INomans Land
Island I Training I Sediment
I I I 2 2 24ll.0 - 1,935.0
I EPA 314
miles south west of Martha's
IVineyard. Nomans Island is an
uninhabKated island used as a
IState I BRAC
wildlife refuge and perchlorate does
not present a threat to human
. . , , , , I I
heatlh.
File: PercDala_A1ISvcs_May6_
Sheet: Env Restoration-Cleanup, Other • Method 314 reporting IimK is 4 ppb Page 11 0175
Regulatory

location
Detected
I I
I'Number of Number of Range ~f
I I. Analytical requested,
Method Potential Pathway(s) of Exposure ~iIIing
Interest (Cleanup
I Funding Type
(Media) Collected Detected (ppb) reqUIrements,
sampling
requirements)
I
I~~~~ lake IRP /operational Testing; Training; I None. Groundwater is not used for
EPA 314 lhuman consumption. S~e is
Navy I INAVAIRWPNSTA CHINA
Marine Corps LAKE CA leacha~ Demil~arizationlDisposal IGroundwater
I I I 1 1 15.0 ( odifred) separated from drinking water
m source wells by miles and thick clay
aqu~ard.
IFederal; State I DERP
Navy I INAVAIRWPNSTA CHINA ,China la~e IRP reSear?h. Dev.elopment, Test and .
Ma . Cor LAKE CA
nne Ps
#46 Dunkil EvaluatIOn; MalntenancelReconflguratlOn; Groundwater
Drainage D~ch Demil~rizationlDisposal
I I I I 2
\
2 58.1-421.0
I None. Groundwater is not used for
EPA 314 \human consumption. S~e is
( odifred) separated from drinking water
aqu~rd.
China lake IRP I I I None. Groundwater is not used for

S~e
I I
Navy I \NAVAIRWPNSTA CHINA 1#7 Michelson Research, Development, Test and EPA 314!human consumption.. is IFederal; State;
4 4 19.0·720.0 ( odifred) separated from dnnkl 19 water I DERP
Marine Corps LAKE CA lab Drainage Evaluation; Manufacturing
D~ch
Groundwater
I m
l I
source wells by miles and thick clay Dca
aquitard.
None. Groundwater is not used for
China lake IRP
Research. Development. Test and human consumption. S~e is
Navy I INAVAIRWPNSTA CHINA Surface 1#8 Evaluation; Manufacturing; Groundwater 3 3 24.6 - 344.0
EPA 314
separated from drinking water IFederal; State I DERP
Marine Corps LAKE CA WaterPl (modified)
Demil~arizationlDisposal source wells by miles and thick clay
Drainage D~ches
aqu~ard.
None. Groundwater is not used for
INAVAIRWPNSTA CHINA IChina lake IRP Is peel that ~. t i l '

I I I EPA 314 human consumption. S~e is
Navy I
Marine Corps LAKE CA #43 Minideck us IS na ura yoccumng Groundwater
I I I 2 2 34.8 - 50,0 ( odifred) separated from drinkirlg water
aquitard.
I
STl
N I Naval Weapons Industrial I I Perchlorate
m~~,
Maa-:rne Cor IReserve Plant. McGregor Area T
ps Texas
Delivery Station ISUrface Water
I I I 3 7 NO 11.0
'I
/Area T Industrial site; Groundwater IState
based on to Surface Water pathway
CAlDHS
I DERP
1997
--
EPA 314;
STl
I I I I I Perchlorate
s~e;
I I I
N I Naval Weapons Industrial
~ Corps Reserve Plant, McGregor Area T . Delivery Station Groundwater 60 64 NO" -140.0 by IC \Area T Industrial Groundwater 15tate
method, to Surface Water pathway
I DERP
Texas
based on
CAlDHS
1997
--STl
Navy I r aval Weapons Industrial

Marine Corps ~eserve Plant, McGregor Area T
exas
I I Delivery Station ISoil
I I 2 32
I ND- 2,300.0 I ~hod
per~~ate Area T Industrial s~e; Soil
contamination leaches to 1St t
~:ed o~ groundwater which leads to Surface a e
I DERP
CAL DHS Water pathway
I , , I , , , , 1997
FUe: PercData_A1ISvcs_May6_
Sheet: Env Restoralion-Cleanup, Other " Method 314 reporting limit is 4 ppb Page 12 of 75
Regulatory

Equipment, Acfovitles) I
Location
Detected
(Media)
I I I
Number of Number of Range o.f
Detections Samples ConcentratIons
I I Analytical requested.
Method Potential Palhway(s) of Exposure per~itling
IInterest (Cleanup
requirements.
I Funding Type
sampling
requirements)
I I
STL
.N:a"'nne! J CorpsIRTexas I I I
Perc'*'rate
I I I ~ IArea T Industrial s~e; Groundwater 1St t

Naval Weapons Industrial
eserve Plant. McGregor Area T Delivery Station Sediment
I 0 2 NO
~sed
CALOHS
a:, to Surface Water pathway ae
I OERP
1997
--
EPA 314;
1
IDemB~rizatio~isposal I I STL
PercHorate
I I
Navy J Naval Weapons Industrial by IC IArea A Landfill; Groundwater to
M . . Cor I Reserve Plant. McGregor Area A Landfill Groundwater 10 12 ,. NO"-110.0 thod Surface water; IState I OERP
anne ps Texas a:,
~~ CommericaVlndustrial worker
CALOHS
1997
--
EPA 314;
N J Naval Weapons Industrial I IDemB~arizationIDisposal I I STL

Perchlorate
I I I
by IC IArea 0 Landfill; Groundwater to
M::ne Cor \Reserve Plant, McGregor Area 0 Landfdl Groundwater 21 24 NO" - 240.0 !hod Surface Water; IState I OERP
Ps Texas a:,
~~ CommericalJlndustrial worker
CALOHS
1997
-
I IDemB~arizationIDisposal I'":"',;'·1. . .
STL
D ,....., _ ........
I I I
N J /Naval Weapons Industrial
.:a'Ze Co Reserve Plant. McGregor Area 0 Landfdl 0 6 NO m~hod. leach to groundwater. GroundwaterISlate
I OERP
ISoB based to surface water exposure pathway;
rps Texas
CAL ~~ CommericalJlndustrial worker
1997
--
EPA 314;
J I IDemil~arizationIDisposal I I STL
Perchlorate
I I I
N Naval Weapons Industrial by IC IArea E Landfdl; Groundwater to
~ CorpsIRese<ve Plant, McGregor Area E LandfiU Groundwater 8 18 NO" - 90.0 method Surface Water; IState I OERP
Texas based o~ CommericalJlndustriaf worker
CALOHS
1997
-
STL
Na J
I I IDemB~arizatiorVOisposal Perchlorate
bylC
Area E landfill; Potential for soB to
leach to groundwater. Groundwater
I I I
"'!
M Cor Reserve Plant, McGregor Area E Landfill
anne Ps Texas ISoU 0 5 NO
I method,
based on
CALOHS
to Surface Water exposure
pathway; CommericaVlndustrial
worker
IState I OERP
1997
File: PercOata_A1ISvcs_May6_
Sheet: Env Restoration-Cleanup, Other " Method 314 reporting 'im~ is 4 ppb Page 13 of 75
Regulatory

Location
Detected
(Media)
I I I
Number of Number of Range o.f
I I Analytical
Interest (Cleanup
requested,
Method Potential Pathway(s) of Exposure per~ilting
reqUIrements,
I Funding Type
sampling
requirements)
I I
EPA 314;
:"!' I I IDemil~arizationiOisposal I I I STL

Perchlorate I
I I I
Naval Weapons Industrial b IC Area 0 Landfill; Groundwater to
Co Reserve Plant, McGregor Area P Surface Water 22 48 NO' -42.0 ~hod Surface Water pathway; IState I OERP
=ed o~ CommericaVlndustrial worker
nne rps Texas
CALOHS
1997
---
EPA 314;
I IDemil~rizationiOisposal I I
STL
:avy
N
nne
, (aval Weapons Industrial
Corp Reserve Plant, McGregor Area P
s Texas
I I I
Groundwater 74 110
I NO' - 98.0
Perchlorate
by IC Area 0 Landfdl; Groundwater to
ethod Surface Water pathway;
~sed o~ CommericaVlndustriai worker
IState I OERP
CALOHS
1997
--
STL
N Naval Weapons Industrial I IDemil~arizationiOisposal
Perchlorate
by IC rrea 0 Landfill; Groundwater to
M~-:r~ Corpsl~=e Plant, McGregor Area P ISediment
I I I 0 2 NO
I method, Surface Water pathway;
based on CommericaVlndustrial worker
CALDHS
IState I OERP
1997
--
STL
I IOemil~arizationiOisposal
Perchlorate
bylC
Area 0 Landfill; Potential for soil
contamination to leach into
I I I I
N , (aval Weapons Industrial
:a-:rne Corps Reserve Plant, McGregor Area P Isoil 0 6 NO method, 9roundwater. Groundwater to IState I DERP
Texas based on Surface Water exposure pathway;
CALOHS CommericaVlndustrial worker
1997
---
EPA 314;
I IDemil~arizationlDisposal I STL
Area Z Industrial Area; Potential for
I I I
Perchlorate soil contamination to leach intp
:ar"! I
N ,
Ina
Cor Reserve Plant, McGregor Area Z
Ps Texas
I
Groundwater 33 43 NO' - 91,000.0
bylC groundwater. Groundwater which
method, leads to Surface Water exposure
based on pathway; CommericaVlndustrial
IState I OERP
CALOHS worker
1997
--
STL
I I IOemil~arizationiOisposal I
Perchlorate
I I I
N , Naval Weapons Industrial bylC
Ma&VY Cor Reserve Plant, McGregor Area Z
nne ps Texas Soil
0 6 NO
Imethod, INone
based on
CALOHS
IState I OERP
1997
File: PercOataflSvcs_May6_
Sheet: Env Restoratioo-Cleanup, Other , Method 314 reporting Iim~ is 4 ppb Page 14 of 75
Regulatory

Location
Detected
(Media)
I I INumber of Number of Range
Detections samples Concentrations
~f I I.Analytical requested.
Method Potential Pathwey(s) of Exposure ~ilting
Interest (Cleanup
requorements,
I Funding Type
sampling
requirements)
I I
EPA 314;
I I I
STL
Perchlorate I
I I
I •
Na I (aVal Weapons Induslrial b IC Area F Industnal Area;
MaY'f Cor Reserve Plant, McGregor Area F
nne Ps Texas
MaintenanceIReconf19uration ISurface Waler 84 125
I NO> - 1,600.0 ~hod Groundwater to Surface Water;
~sed o~ Commerical/lndustrial worker
CALOHS
IState I OERP
1997
--
EPA 314;
I I STL
I I I I
Navy I (aval Weapons Industrial Perchlorate
b IC IArea F Industrial Area,.
Marine C Reserve Plant, McGregor Area F IMaintenanceiRecOnligUration Groundwater 366 456 NO> - 17,000.0 ~hod Groundwater to Surface Water; IState I OERP
orps Texas ~:ro o~ CommericaUlndustrial worker
CALOHS
1997
-
EPA 314;
N I
M:~ Corpsl~eserve
I I
Plant, McGregor Area F MaintenancelReconfiguration I I I I
Soft 41 184 NO> - 98,ooo.0
I
P S~L
m~hod
t Area F Industrial Area; Potential for
er~ ~a esoft contamination to leach into
groundwater. Groundwater to IState I OERP
exas ba ed' Surface Water exposure pathway;
CA~ ~~ CommericaUlndustrial worker
1997
-STL
I I
Perchlorate
I I I I
N I Naval Weapons Industrial bylC
~~ CorpslReserve Plant, McGregor Area F MaintenanceiReconfiguration ISediment 0 2 NO method, I None IState I OERP
Texas based on
CALOHS
1997
-
STL
I I Perchlorate Area M Industrial SRe; Potential for
I~I I I I I
N I Naval Weapons Industrial bylC soil contamination to leach to
Ma~ Cor slReserve Plant, McGregor Area M MaintenanceJReconfiguration; Storage 153 328 NO - 1,800,000.0 method, grOUndwater. Groundwater to IState I OERP
p Texas based on Surface Water exposure pathway;
CALOHS Commerical/lndustrial Wor1<er
-1997STL
I I I
Perchlorate
M
I I
N I Naval Weapons Industrial by IC IArea Industrial SRe; Groundwater
Ma~ Cor Reserve Plant, McGregor Area M
Ps Texas
MaintenanceJReconliguration; Storage !Sediment
I
1 g NO- 310.0
Imethod, to Surface Water pathway;
based on CommericaUlndustrial Wor1<er
CALOHS
IState I OERP
1997
File: PercOata_AHSvcs_May6_
Sheet: Env Restoratior>-Cleanup, Other >Method 314 reporting limR is 4 ppb Page 15 of 75
Regulatory

Location
Detected
(Media)
I I I
~f I I
Analytical
Interest (Cleanup
requested,
requirements,
I Funding Type
sampling
requirements)
I I
STL
I I I I I I
Perchlorate
I
N I Naval Weapons Industrial by IC IArea ttl Industrial Srte; Groundwater
:a~ Cor IReserve Plant, McGregor Area M MainlenancelReconfl9uratiOn; Storage Surface Water 267 344 NO - 5,300.0 method, to Surface Water pathway; IState I OERP
nne ps Texas based on CornmericaUlndustriai Worker
CALOHS
1997
--
EPA 314;
N
:a~
I
I
Cor Reserve Plant, McGregor Area M
I ·1MaintenancelR~nliguration; Storage I I I I
Groundwater 354 445 'NO· - 85.000.0
I ~hodSTL
Perchlorate
IC Area M Industrial . Srte;
. Groundwater
Ito Surface Water pathway; IState I OERP
nne Ps Texas :sed o~ CornmericaUlndustrial Worker
CALOHS
1997
-STL
I I Perchlorate Area B Industrial Area; Potential for
I
bylC soH to leach to groundwater.
I I I
:a~ Corp IReserve Plant, McGregor Area B Maoofacturing ISOH 1 2 NO - 35.0 method, Groundwater to Surface Water IState I OERP
nne s Texas based on exposure pathway;
CALOHS CornmericaUlndustriai worker
1997
-
STL
I I I I I I
Perchlorate
bylC
I
:a~ C IReserve Plant. McGregor Area B Manufacturing Groundwater 0 2 NO method, INone IState I OERP
nne orps Texas based on
CALOHS
1997
-
I
STL
Perchlorate
:az.e I
Corps Reserve Plant, McGregor Area L
Texas
loperationai Testing I
Groundwater
I I I I10 33 NO -160.0
by IC \Area L Industrial srte; Groundwater
method. to Surface Water;
based on CommericaUlndustrial worker
IState I OERP
CALOHS
1997
-
STL
I I Perchlorate
I I I I I
N I Naval Weapons Industrial bylC
~~ C Reserve Plant, McGregor Area L Operational Testing ISOH 0 29 NO method. INone IState I OERP
lne orps Texas based on
CALOHS
1997
FHe: PercData_AlISvcS_May6_
Sheet:Env Restoration-Cleanup. Other • Method 314 reporting limrt is 4 ppb Page 16 of 75
Regulatory

Location
Detected
(Media)
I I I
N b
D~:;ct~~~s
f Number of Range of
I I Anal I I
Interest (Cleanup
requested.
Me:.:: Potential Pathway(s) of Exposure pern~ilting
requ..ements,
I Funding Type
sampling
requirements)
I I
STL
N I INaval Weapons Industrial I I I I I

Perchlorate
bylC
M""'! Corps Reserve Plant, McGregor Area L
anne Texas
loperationai Testing Surface Water 0 4 NO
Imethod, INone
based on
CALOHS
IState I OERP
1997
--
EPA 314;
N
M~ Cor
I Naval Weapons Industrial I
IReserve Plant, McGregor Area R loperationai T ~ting I I
Groundwater 27 41 I' NO-110.0
I r STL
Perchlorate
b IC rea R lndustna.I's~e; Groundwater
~hod to Surface Water pathway;
IState I OERP
Ps Texas I ': : 00 0:,
CommericaVlndustrial Worker
CALOHS
1997
--
STL
N I (aVal Weapons Industrial

:a~ C Reserve Plant, McGregor Area R
I ~surface Water
Perchlorate
by IC
IArea R Industrial s~e; Groundwater
nne orps Texas

loperational Testing
I I I 4 7 NO-23.0
I
method,
to Surface Water pathway;
based on
CommericaVlndustrial Worker
CALOHS
IState I OERP
1997
--
STL
N I I Perchlorate
bylC
Area R Industrial s~e; Potential for
soB to leach to groundwater.
I I I I
Ma""'! C IReserve Plant, McGregor Area R [operational Testing 1 21 NO - 59.0 method, Groundwater to Surface Water (State I OERP
ISoB
nne orps Texas based on exposure pathway;
CALOHS CommericaVlndiistrial Worker
1997
--
STL
N I I I Perchlorate
bylC
I I I
(aVal Weapons lridustrial
Ma""'! Corps Reserve Plant, McGregor Area R
nne Texas
Operational Testing ISediment
I 0 2 NO. method, INone
based on
CALOHS
IState I OERP
1997
--
STL
N I
I I I
Perchlorate
Various manufacturing areas ons~e;
bylC Potential for soil to leach into
I I
Ma~ Co Reserve Plant, McGregor OZ Offs~e
anne rps Texas
loperational Testing Soil 1 33
I
NO -370.0
Imethod, groundwater. Groundwater to
based on Surface Waterexposure pathway;
CALDHS Residentual
IState I OERP
1997
FDa: PercOata_AI/Svcs_May6_
Sheet: Env Restoration-CIeanup, Other • Method 314 reporting Iim~ is 4 ppb Page 17 of 75
Regulatory
I I I I
Interest (Cleanup
Location
0.'
Equipment, Activities) I Detected
(Media)
Analytical I . requested,
Method PotentIal Pathway(s) of Exposure permitting
requirements,
I Funding Type
sampling
requirements)
I I
EPA 314;
STL
I
I Iper~h1I~ate IvariouS manufacturing areas ons~e;
I I I

~;rne Cor sl Reserve Plant, McGregor OZ Offs~e loperationai Testing Surface Water 4 21 NO' - 370.0 ~hod Groundwater to Surface Water; ISlale I OERP
P Texas ~:ed 0:, Residentual
CALOHS
1997
---
EPA 314;
I I I
STL
Iper~~ate Ivarious manufacturing areas ons~e;
I I I
Na I Naval Weapons Industrial

M Cor Reserve Plant, McGregor OZ Offs~e
"'! loperalionai Tesling Groundwater 389 804 NO - 56,000.0 m~hod. GrOl;'ndwater to Surface Water; IState
I OERP
anne ps Texas
based on
Residenlual
CALOHS
1997
-
STL
N I
~"'!
Corp \Reserve Plant, McGregor OZ ~e
nne s Texas
I I Operational Testing I I I I
I
Sediment 2 19 NO-720.0
Perchlorate
by IC rarious manufacturing areas ons~;
method,
Groundwater to Slriace Water; IState I OERP
based on· Residentual
CALOHS
1997
---
EPA 314;
STL
Navy I INaval Weapons Industrial IBelI

Marine Corps ~eserve Plant, McGregor (Off Post)
I
Co. Intake Operational Testing;
MaintenancelReconfi9uration; Storage; I I I I
I
Surface Water 1 45 NO' - 4.1
Perchlorate
I
by IC Drinking water supply plant;
method, residential user
IStale I OERP
exas Oem~~arizationIDisposal
based on
CALOHS
1997
---
EPA 314;
I I I I
I
STL
Perchlorate
Navy I ,NaVal Weapons Industrial IBluebonnet rperational Testing; . bylC
Marine Corps Reserve Plant, McGregor Intake (Off Post) Mainl~na.ncelRec?nftguralton; Storage; Surface Water 0 44 NO method, INone
IState I OERP
Texas '. DemftilanzalloniOlsposal
based on
CALOHS
1997
---
EPA 314;
IGates
I I STL
Perchlorate
I I I
N I (aVal Weapons Industrial iN Int k /operational Testing;

~~ Cor Reserve Plant, McGregor (Off p~~ a e Mai"!~na.nceIR~nfiguration; Storage; Surface Water 0 46 NO bylC IN
method, one
IState I OERP
ps Texas OemtlilanzatlOniOlsposal
based on
CALOHS
1997
I I I I I I I
F~: PercOata_AUSvcs_May6_
Sheet: Env Restoration-Cleanup, Other

' Method 314 reporting Iim~ is 4 ppb Page 18 of 75
Regulatory

Location
Detected
(Media)
I I I
Number of Number of Range o.f I I .
Analytical requested,
Detections Samples ConcentratIons Method Potenllal Pathway(s) of Exposure permitting
Collected Detected (ppb) requirements,
Interest (Cleanup
I Funding Type
sampling
requirements)
I I
EPA 314;
N I
I
I STL
Perchlorate
I I I
(aVal Weapons Industrial IH . Cr k (1operational Testing;
r:a"'! Cor Reserve Plant. McGregor Pa~~ ee MaintenancelReconfoguration; Storage; Surface Water 21 62 NO· -17.0
by IC IGroundwater to Surface water;
method, surface water; agriCultural;
IState I OERP
nne Ps Texas os DerniitarizationlDisposal
based on
CALOHS
1997
--
EPA 314;
I I I STL
Perchlorate . .
b IC Drink water and recreational
I I I
Navy I (aVal Weapons Industrial Lake Belton (Off 10P?"ational Testing; .
Ma' Cor Reserve Plant, McGregor Post) MalntenancelReconfigurallon; Storage; ISurface Water 190 790 NO· - 210.0 ;hod reservoir; residential and IState I OERP
nne Ps Texas DemiitarizationiDisposal ~:oo o~ agricultural receptors
CALOHS
1997
-
STL
Perchlorate
Navy I (aval Weapons Industrial ILake Belton (Off 10P?"ationaJ Testing;
Ma' C Reserve Plant, McGregor P t)
nne orps Texas OS
.
Ma,ntenanceiReconfigurat,on; Storage;
OemilitarizationlDisposal
I
Sediment
I I I 39 153 NO-540.0
I
by IC rrink water and recreational
method, reservoir; residential and
based on agricultural receptors
IState I OERP
CALOHS
1997
-STL
I I I
PercHorate
I I I I ~~
Na I Naval Weapons Industrial ILak W Off Operational Testing;
Ma C Reserve Plant, McGregor P ~) aeo ( MaintenanceiReconfoguration; Storage;
"'! IOrinking water and recreational
Surface Water 1 291 NO -17.4
~ sed'on reservoir; residential receptors
IState I OERP
nne orps Texas os OemiitarizationiOisposal
CALOHS
1997
-
STL
Perchlorate
N I
r:a,."'! Co
lI16
(aVal Weapons Industrial ILak W (Off !operational Testing;
Reserve Plant, McGregor P ~) aeo
rps Texas os
MaintenanceiReconfoguration; Storage;
DemiitarizationiOisposal
I
Sediment
I 0
I 69
I NO
I
bylC
method, I None
based on
IState I OERP
CALOHS
1997
--
EPA 314;
N I (aval Weapons Industrial IL R (Off rperationaJ Testing; I I STL

p~l~ate River that supplies Lake Bellon its
r:a"'! Co Reserve Plant, McGregor Peo~) lVer
nne rps Texas os
Maintenance/Reconfoguration; Storage;
DemiitarizationIDisposal
ISurface Water
I I I 14 124 NO· - 27.0 m~hod, water; residential and agricultural ISlale
based on receptors
CALOHS
I OERP
1997
File: PercOata_AJISvcs_May6_
Sheet: Env Restoration-Cleanup, Other • Method 314 reporting limit is 4 ppb Page 19 of 75
Regulatory

Source of PerChlorate (Operations,
Location
Detected
(Media)
I I I
Number of Number of Range o.f I I.
Analytical requested,
Detections Samples Concentrations Method Potential Pathway(s) of Exposure ~ilting
Collected Detected (ppb) reqUirements,
Interest (Cleanup
I Funding Type.
sampling
requirements)
I I
EPA 314;
N I \ Naval Weapons Industrial ISouth B

Corps Reserve Plant, McGregor
I
R Operational Testing;
(Off Post~que . Ma",!~na.nc~ec~uration; Storage; I I I 39 129 NO' -13.0
I
STL
Perchlorate I'
b IC Groundwater to surface water;
m~hod. agricultural and res.idential ISlate
OERP
Maav;{
ne Texas OemK~arizatlOn/OlSposal
Surface Water
I
based on
receptors
I
CALOHS
1997
--
EPA314;
STL
Navy I I
Naval Weapons Industrial IStation Creek rperational Testing;
Marine Corps Reserve Plant, McGregor (Off Post)
Texas
MainlenancelReconfiguration; Storage;
Oem~~arizationlDisposal
I Surface Water
I I I
I
58 85 NO' - 6,600.0
Perchlorate
I
by IC Groundwater to Surface water; IStat
method, surface water; agricultural receptor e
I OERP
based on
CALOHS
1997
---
EPA 314;
IT(;;'P:) I STL
Perchlorate
I I I
N I INaval Weapons Industrial pi Intak loperationai Testing;

~ Corps Reserve Plant, MCGregor e Mainl~na.nce.'ReconflQuration; Storage; Isurface Water 0 44 NO by IC INone
method,
IState r OERP
Texas Demll~rizatlOnJDlsposal
based on
CALDHS
1997
--
EPA 314;
(aVal Weapons Industrial Iwacos Intake rperational Testing;

I STL
Perchlorate
I I I
Navy I by IC I None
Marine Corps ~eserve Plant, McGregor (Off Post) MainlenanceJReconfiguration; Storage; ISurface Water 0 44 NO
method,
IState I OERP
exas DemR~arizationJDisposal
based on
CALOHS
1997
--
EPA 314;
N I Naval Weapons Industrial IW'ldfl [operational Testing; I STL
Perchlorate
I
~~ Corpsl Reserve Plant, McGregor
Texas
l~ake~ Post) Mai"!ena.nce.'Rec?nflQuralion; Storage;
DemilitarizatIOn/DIsposal
ISurface Water
I I I
2 45 NO··6.0 by IC Surface water; irrigation; residential IState
method, receptors
based on
CALOHS
I DERP
1997
---
EPA 314;
I I I STL
Perchlorate Area 0 Industrial Area;
I I I
Navy I (aval Weapons Industrial I bylC Groundwater to surface water

Marine Corps Reserve Plant, McGregor Area 0 Storage
Groundwater 62 88 NO' -160.0 IState I OERP
method, pathway; Commerical/lndustrial
Texas
based on Worker
CALOHS
I I I I ! I
1997
I
File: PercOata_AlISvcs_May6_

• Method 314 reporting lim~ is 4 ppb Page 20 of 75
Regulatory
Interest (Cleaoop

Location
Detected
I I I
I I Analytical requested,
Method Potential Pathway(s) of Exposure per~ilting I Funding Type
(Media) Collected Detected (ppb) reqUIrements,
sampling
requirements)
STL
I I I
Perchlorate
bylC
Area 0 Industrial Area; Potential for
son to leach into groundwater.
I
~;rne Cor IReserve Plant. McGregor Area 0
Ps Texas
Storage Son
I I 1 7
I NO - 25.0 method.
based on
CALOHS
Groundwater to surface water
exposure pathway;
CornmericaVlndustrial Worker
IState I OERP
1997
-
STL
I I Iso~
Perchlorate
bylC
I
~;rne C IReserve Plant, McGregor Area G
orps Texas
Storage
I I I· 0 2 NO method. INone
based on
CALOHS
IState I OERP
-1997STL
I I I
Perchlorate
bylC
I I
~;rne Co IReserve Plant. McGregor Area G
rps Texas
Storage Groundwater 0 4
I NO
Imethod. INone
based on
CALOHS
IState I OERP
1997
--
EPA 314;
I I I I STL
Perchlorate
I I I
N I Naval Weapons Industrial b IC IArea H storage area; Groundwater
Ma~nne Corps IReserve Plant. McGregor Area H Storage Groundwater 15 32 NO· -41.0 ~hod to Surface Water; IState I OERP
Texas
~sed'on CornmericaVlndustrial Worker
CAL OHS
1997
-
STL
I I I
Perchlorate
I I
N I Naval Weapons Industrial by IC rrea H storage area; Groundwater
~~nne Corps Texas
Reserve Plant, McGregor Area H Storage ISurface Water 2
I I 4 NO - 9.7 method, to Surface Water;
based on CommericaVlnduslrial Worker
CALOHS
IState I OERP
1997
-
STL
I I
Perchlorate
bylC
Area H storage area; Potential for
son to leach into groundwater.
I I
N I (aVal Weapons Industrial
~7ne Cor Reserve Plant, McGregor Area H
Ps Texas
Storage Ison 10
I 51
I NO - 93,000.0 method.
based on
CALOHS
Groundwater to SUrface Water IState
exposure pathway;
CommericaVlndustriaf Worker
I OERP
1997
Fne: PercOata_AfISvcs_May6_
Sheet: Env Restoration-Cleanup, Other • Method 314 reporting limft is 4 ppb Page 21 of 75
Regulatory

Location
Detected
(Media)
I I I
~f I I·Analytical .
requested,
Method Potential Pathway(s) of Exposure per~itling
requirements,
Interest (Cleanup
I Funding Type
sampling
requirements)
I I
STL
Perchlorate
1
:~ I Cor
nne
INaval Weapons Industrial
Reserve Plant. McGregor Area H
Ps Texas
[storage I
Sediment
I I I 0 2 NO
I
bylC
method. I None
based on
IState I DERP
CALOHS
1997
---
EPA 314;
I I I
P S~L t
er~ ~ e
Area 0 Industrial Area; Potential lor
I I
Na I INaval Weapons Industrial soil contamination to leach into
m~hod
Mavy Cor Reserve Plant, McGregor Area S
nne Ps Texas
./Storage s al
44
I 119 NO - 1,500,000.0 groundwater. Groundwater to
based' surface water exposure pathway;
CAL 0; CommericaVlndustrial Worker
IStale I OERP
1997
-STL
Na I
~
Naval Weapons Industrial I I I
I Perchlorate .
by IC IArea 0 Industnal Area;
I I I
ethod Groundwater to surface water
M Cor IReBerVe Plant, McGregor Area S 1 4 NO -120.0 IState I OERP
:sed o~ pathway; CommericaVlndustrial
Storage Sediment
anne ps Texas
CAL OHS Worker
1997
---
EPA 314;
Na I
anne
(aVal Weapons Industrial
M ~ Corps Reserve Plant, McGregor Area S
Texas
I /Storage IGroundwater
I I I 117 140 NO' - 13.000.0
I STL
Perchlorate
bylC
method,
Area 0 Industrial Area;
Groundwater to surface water
IState I OERP
based on Worker
CALOHS
1997
-
EPA 314;
I I I I I STL
Perchlorate Area 0 Industrial Area;
I I
:a~ bylC Groundwater to surface water
nne
Corp Reserve Plant. McGregor Area S
s Texas
Storage Surface Water 31 g7
I NO' - 810.0
method,
based on
Worker
IStale I OERP
CALOHS
1997
-
STL
I I Perchlorate
bylC
I
Navy I Naval Weapons Industrial
Marine Corps ~:=e Plant, McGregor Area A Isoil
I I I 0 1 NO
I method, INone
based on
CALOHS
IState I DERP
1997
File: PercOata_AllSvcs_May6_
Sheet: Env Restoration-Cleanup. Other , Method 314 reporting limit is 4 ppb Page 22 0175
Regulatory

Location
Detected
Io~~::sI I
N b f Number of Range of
I ;::c: I
A I • I
Interest (Cleanup
reqUested.
Potential Pathway(s) of Exposure per~illing I Funding Type
(Media) Collected Detected (ppb) reqUIrements.
sampling
requirements)
I I
STL
I I Perchlorate
I
bylC
I I
Na I Naval Weapons Industrial
Ma~ Corps Reserve Plant, McGregor
Texas
Area A
I 1Groundwater
I 0 1 NO method, INone
based on
CALOHS
IState I OERP
1997
---
EPA 314;
N I
I Naval Weapons Industrial
~;rne Corps Reserve Plant. McGregor
I I
I·
STL
Perchlorate
I by IC 1Open Area; Groundwater

IState I
Texas
Area E
1
Groundwater
1
5
I 21 NO·-40.0 elhod recharges Surface Water;
:Sed o~ CommericaVlndustrial work9l"
OERP
CALOHS
1997
--
STL
Navy I I
Naval Weapons Industrial I Iso~
Perchlorate
bylC
Marine Corps ~::;e Plant, McGregor Area E
I I I I 0 6 NO
I method, INone
based on
CALOHS
IState I OERP
1997
--
STL
N I Naval Weapons Industrial I Perchlorate

bylC
Maa-:rne CorpsIR9S9rYe Plant, McGregor Area E
Texas 1
ISurface Water
I 0
1
1
1
NO
I method, INone
based on
CALOHS
IState I OERP
-----r-
1997
Potential human exposure pathway
Na I I via groundwat9l". Residential area is

1 EPA 314 llocated adjacent to the base by IR
I I I
Naval Weapons Station 17SHMW002 - 1
M Y'f Cor Seal Beach Detachment Groundwater Dem~ilarizationIDisposal 1Groundwater 1 1 0.6 (modified)· Site 22 and wh~e they are generally IFederal; State I OERP
anne ps Concord Mannoring Well <MRL on a public water supply system,
Iocat irrigation wells exist and iIIicn
potable wells may too.
Navy I I
Naval Weapons Station
Ma' Corps seal Beach Detachment
I
BUAMWOO2 -I
Groundwater DemilnarizationIDisposal I I I
Groundwater 1 1 1.3·
I via groundwater. Residential area
EPA 314 "ocated adjacent to the base and
(modified)· wh~e they are generally on a public IFederal; Staie I OERP
nne Concord Mannering Well <MRL water supply system, local irrigation
1
wells exist and ~Iicn potable wells
may too.
Fie: P9I"cOata_AUSvcs_May6_
Sheet: Env Restoration-Cleanup, Other • Method 314 reporting limn is 4 ppb Page 23 of 75
Regulatory

Location
Detected
(Media)
I I I
~f I I.Analytical reqUested,
Interest (Cleanup

requirements,
I Funding Type
sampling
requirements)
I
Na I (aVal Weapons Station
IBUAMW010 I I via groundwater. Residential area
EPA 314 j'ocated adjacent to the base and

M "'! Co Seal Beach Detachmert Groundwater DemUilarizationlDisposal
anne rps Concord Monitoring Well
IGroundwater
I I
I
1 1 0.60 (modified) 0 while they are generally on a public IFederal; State
<MRL water supply system, local irrigation
wells exist and ilicft potable wells
I DERP
may too.
Navy I (aVal Weapons Station BUAMW011

EPA 314
Ma . Cor Seal Beach Detachment Groundwater DemilftarizationlDisposal Groundwater 0 1 NO
(modified)
None IFederal; State I DERP
nne Ps Concord Monitoring Well
Navy I I I I via groundwater. Residential area
I
I
INaval Weapons Station [BUAMW012 EPA 314 I'ocated adjacent to the base and
M . Co Seal Beach Detachment Groundwater DerniftarizaliorYDisposal
anne rps Concord Monftoring Well
Groundwater
I 2 2 0.7 - 2.0 (modified) 0 while they are generally on a public IFederal; State
<MRL water supply system, local irrigation
wells exist and illicft potable wells
I DERP
may too.
N I Naval WeapOns Station TLSMWOO1

~"'!nne CorpsISeal Beach Detachment
Concord
Groundwater DernilftarizationlDisposal NO
EPA 314
(modified)
None IFederal; State I DERP
MoniIoring Well
Navy I
M .
anne
(aVal Weapons Station
Corps Concord
Seal Beach Detachmert
TLSMWOO2
Groundwater IDemilftarizationiDisposal IGroundwater
I I
I
0 1 NO I EPA 314
(modified) INone IFederal; State I DERP
MoniIoring Well
Navy I (aval WeapOns Station
Ma' Corps Seal Beach Detachment
nne Concord
TLSMWOO3
Groundwater IDemilftarization/Disposal IGroundwater
I I
0 1
I
NO I EPA314
(modified) INone IFederal; Slate I DERP
Monftoring Well
Navy I I
Naval Weapons Station TLSMWOO4
I
M' Corps Seal Beach Detachment
anne Concord
Groundwater IDemilitarizatiOnlDisposal
MoniIoring Well
IGroundwater
I
I
I
0 1 NO EPA314
(modified) INone IFederal; State I QERP
N
.:av~
nne
I Naval Weapons Station
Corpsl Concord
Seal Beach Detachment
TLSMWOO5
Groundwater IDemilftarizationlDisposal IGroundwater
I I
0
I
2 NO I EPA 314
Monitoring Well
Nav I (ava! Weapons Station
Ma ~ Cor Seal Beach Detachment
nne Ps Concord
TLSMWOO6
Grou~ter
Monitoring Well
IDemilftarizationlDisposal I Groundwater
I I
0 1
I
NO I EPA314
N I Naval Weapons Station TLSMWOO7

Ma"'! Cor ISeal Beach Detachment Groundwater Demilitarization/Disposal NO None IFederal; State I DERP
anne Ps Concord
.I - 1_.. " '"

Monitoring Well
The building is on the list to be
I I
n..." ..,
I I
I
I
I
IBuilding 411, Wat 846 currently vacated. The human O&M or Defense
Navy I INAVWPNSTA SEAL

NWSSeal MaintenancelReconfiguration Other 3 14 NO - 9,410.0 Metro:'9058 exposure pathway is present for None Working Capital
Marine Corps BEACH CA

Beach IC ' workers that will perform the Fund
decontamination of the building pr;

, , , , I , to demolition.
I I
SheeI: Env Restoration-Cleanup, Other o Melhod 314 reporting limft is 4 ppb Page 24 of 75
Regulatory

Location
Detected
(Media)
I I INumber of Number of Range o.f
I I Analytical
Interest (Cleanup
requested.
Method Potential Pathway(s) of Exposure ~iIting
reqUIrements.
I Funding Type
sampling
requirements)
I
IBuilding 68.
I
Surface demolished in FY04. The building is
I Water846lcurrently vacated. The human I I O&M or Defense
Navy! INAVWPNSTA SEAL
NWSSeal
Beach
MaintenanceiReconfiguration ISoil
I I I 4 7 ND -2,460.0 Method 9058 exposure pathway is present for None
IC • workers that will perform the
decontamination of the building pri
Working Capital
Fund
to demolition.
Navy! INAVWPNSTA SEAL

Building 68.
INwsseal
BeaCh
I
MaintenanceIReconfiguration I I Other 0
I
17
I NO I Surface
Water846 None
Method 9058.
IC
I I
None
O&M or Defense
Working capital
Fund
IBuilding 75,
I I Surface demolished in FY04. The building is
Water846lcurrently vacated. !he human I I O&M or Defense
I I I
Navy! INAVWPNSTA SEAL 1 27 ND -2,400.0
NWSSeal MaintenanceiReconflQuraiion IOther Method 9058 exposure pathway,s present for None Working capital
Beach IC • workers that will perform the Fund
decontamination of the building pri,
to demolition.
I
CA
I I~ Site.6, I I I
Department
Navy! NAVWPNSTA SEAL
urnlng roo
Operational Testing;
BXpl~slV~ nd Demilitarization/Disposal Groundwater
I 0
I I 5 NO of Heailh INone
ServICes
Perchlorate
IState I DERP
r-
Method
IRSite 70,
I I I I I
Research
Navy! INAVWPNSTA SEAL rTesting and IResearch, Development, Test and
Marine Corps BEACH CA Evaluation Area Evaluation
IGroundwater I 0 I 1 I ND I EPA 314 INone IState I DERP
for saturn II
Launch Vehicle
:e 1~Chemical Demilitarization/Disposal
Navy! Surface Warfare Center
I IGroundwater I 1 I 8 I ND' -7.6 I EPA 314 I IFederal; State I DERP
Marine Corps DAHLGREN. m ea
Navy! Surface Warfare Center Site 15 Scrap

Marine Corps DAHLGREN Area
IDemilitarization/Disposal ISediment I 0 I 7 I ND I EPA 314 INone IFederal; State I DERP
Navy! Surface Warfare Center 1::15 Scrap

Marine Corps DAHLGREN
IDemilitarization/Disposal ISoil I 0 I 21 I ND I EPA 314 INone IFederal; State I DERP
Navy! Surface Warfare Center ISite 15 Scrap

IDemilitarization/Disposal IGroundwater I 0 I 5 I ND I EPA 314 INone IFederal; State I DERP
Navy! Surface Warfare Center ISite 15 Scrap

IDemilitarization/Disposal ISurface Water I 0 I 3 I ND I EPA 314 INone IFederal; State I DERP
Sheet: Env Restoration-Cleanup, Other 'Method 314 reporting limit is 4 ppb Page 25 0175
Regulatory

Location
Detected
(Media)
I I I
N be f Number of Range of
D:"ecti::: Samples Concentrations
I I A fyli I
~~h~a
Interest (Cleanup
requested.
Potential Pathway(s) of Exposure permilling
requrements.
I Funding Type
sampling
requirements)
Navy! Surface Warfare Center Site 4 Case

Storage Area
DemHilarizatiorVDisposal NO' - 339,0 Federal; State I DERP

IDemBitarizalion/Disposal ISediment I 0 I 3 I NO I EPA 314 INone IFederal; State I DERP
Marine Corps DAHLGREN Storage Area

IDemBitarizaliorVDisposal IGroundwater I 0 ' I 5 I NO I EPA 314 INane IFederal; State I DERP

IDemHitarization1Disposal ISurface Water I 0 I 1 I· NO I EPA 314 INane IFederal; State I DERP
Navy! Surface Warfare Center Site 40 Bldg, 10

BiIa' f rVD'
120B DRMO Lot em nza 10 Isposa
I ISoB I 0 I 19 I NO I EPA 314 INone IFederal; State I DERP
Navy! Surface Warfare Center Site 40 Bldg, IDe Bit ' f n/D' I
120B DRMO Lot m anza 10 Isposa IGroundwater I 0 I 8 I NO I EPA 314 INone IFederal; State I DERP
Navy! Surface Warfare Center Site 61a Gambo 1 BiIa' f n/D'

0
Creek Ash Dump em nza 10 Isposa
I ISediment I 0 I 9 I NO I INone IFederal; State I DERP
Navy! Surface Warfare Center Site61aGambo Hit' f rVD' I

Creek Ash Dump,iDeml anza 10 Isposa ISoil I 0 I 30 I NO I INone IFederat; State I DERP
Navy! Surface Warfare Center Site 61a Gambo 10

Bit' f n/D'
Creek Ash Dump, em anza 10 ISposa
I ISurface Water I 0 I 6 I NO I EPA 314 INone IFederal; State I DERP
Site 61b Gambo

MarineCorps DAHLGREN
Creek Disposal IDemBitarization/Disposal ISediment I 0 I 4 I NO I INone IFederal; State I DERP
Area
Navy! ISurface Warfare Center

I Site61b Gambo
I
Creek Disposal Demilitarization/Disposal ISoil I 0 I 8 I NO I INone IFederal; State I DERP
Area

Site 61b Gambo
I
Icreek Disposal Demifilarizalion/Disposal IGroundwater I 0 I 4 I NO I EPA 314 INone IFederal; Stale I DERP
Area
------.
Navy ! ISurface Warfare Center
Site 61b Gambo
Creek Disposal IDemilitarizatiorVDisposal ISurface Water I 0 I 4 I NO I EPA 314 INone IFederal; State I DERP
Area

Site 62 Bldg, 396IDemBilarizalion/Disposal ISediment I 0 I 1 I NO I EPA 314 INane IFederal; State r DERP

ISite 62 Bldg, 3961 DemBitarizationiDisposal ISoil I 0 I 10 I NO I EPA 314 INone IFederal; State I DERP

Site 62 Bldg. 3961 DemBitarizationlDisposal IGroundwater I 0 I 4 I NO I EPA 314 INane IFederal; State I DERP
MarineCorps DAHLGREN
FHe: PercData_A1ISvcs_May6_
Sheet: Env Restoration-Oeanup. Other • Method 314 reporting limit is 4 ppb Page 26 0175
Regulatory

Location
Detected
(Media)
I I I
~f I I.Analytical
Interest (Cleanup
requested,
Method Potential Pathway(s) of Exposure per~itting I Funding Type
Collected Detected (ppb) reqUirements,
sampling
requirements)
Navy! Isurface Warfare Center NO None Federal; State DERP

I
Navy! ISurface Warfare Center IOBIOO Outfall IResearch, Development, Test and
Marine Corps DAHLGREN 012 Evaluation
ISurface Water
I 1
I
2
I
NO" - 7.4
I I EPA 314 None
O&M or Defense
Working Capftal
Fund
O&M or Defense
Navy! ISurface
Warfare Center
IOBIOD Wells
IResearch, Development, Test and
Groundwater 7 9 NO" - 2,100.0 EPA 314 State Working Capilal
Marine Corps DAHLGREN Evaluation

Fund
Navy! Surface Warfare Center Research, Development, Test and

Sfte 62 Bldg. 396 Sediment 0 1 NO None Federal; State DERP
Marine Corps DAHLGREN Evaluation
Navy! Surface Warfare Center Research, Development, Test and

Sfte 62 Bldg. 396
Evaluation
ISoil I 0 I 10 I NO I INone IFederal; State I DERP
Navy! Surface Warfare Center Research, Development. Test and

Sfte 62 Bldg. 396
Evaluation
IGroundwater I 0 I 4 I NO I EPA 314 INone IFederal; State I DERP
Navy! Surface Warfare Center Research, Development. Test and

Sfte 62 Bldg. 396
Evaluation
ISurface Water I 0 I 1 I NO I EPA 314 INone IFederal; State I DERP
Sfte2 Fenced
Navy! Surface Warfare Center Ord B' I IResearch. Development, Test and
nance
una Evaluation; DemilftarizatiorVDisposal
IGroundwater I 0 I 18 I NO I EPA 314 INone IFederal; State I DERP
Sfte 6 Terminal
Navy! ISurface Warfare Center IR A' IResearch. Development, Test and
Marine Corps DAHLGREN p:~e Ifplane Evaluation; DemilftarizatiorVDisposal IGroundwater I 0 I 1 I NO I EPA 314 INone IFederal; State I DERP

ISfte9
Disposal/Burn
Research, Development. Test and
Evaluation; DemilftarizatiorVDisposal
Groundwater 0 10 NO EPA 314 None Federal; State DERP
IArea
:~! Cor IPATUXENT RIVER NAS

nne ps
I Source Water
Bldg 1633
No contamination sources. Groundwater 0 1 NO EPA 314 None None
O&M or Defense
Working CapftaJ
Fund
:~! C IPATUXENT RIVER NAS

nne orps
ISource Water INo contamination sources.
Bldg 2136
IGroundwater
I 0
I
1
I
NO
I
I
EPA 314 None INone I O&M or Defense
Working Capftal
Fund
I
I I
O&M or Defense
~a~! Cor IPATUXENTRIVERNAS

anne ps
Isource Water
Bldg 2275
INo contamination sources. IGroundwater
I I 0 1
I
NO EPA 314 None INone Working Capftal
Fund
--
:~! I
Cor PATUXENT RIVER NAS
nne ps
No contamination sources. NO None
O&M or Defense
Working Capital
Fund
File: PercData_AJISvcs_May6_
Sheet: Env Restoration-Cleanup. Other " Method 314 reporting limft is 4 ppb Page 27 of 75
Regulatory

Location
Detected
(Media)
I I I
~f
I I Analytical
Interest (Oeanup
reqUested,
reqUIrements,
I Funding Type
sampling
reqUirements)
Manne ps
I
N~ 1 Cor PATUXENT RIVER NAS ISource Water
Bldg 524
INo contamination sources. IGroundwater
I
0
I I 1 NO
I
EPA 314 INone . INone
O&M or Defense
WorI<ing Capital
Fund
INo I I I I I O&M or.Defense

=~ CorpsIPATUXENT RIVER NAS ISource Water
Bldg 529
contamination sources. Groundwater
I
0
I 1
I NO EPA 314 None None WorI<ing Capital
Fund
I I IO&M or Defense
Na~1 Cor IPATUXENTRIVERNAS
Marone ps
ISource Water
Bldg 530
No contaminati?" sources. IGroundwater
I 0
1\ 1
I. NO
I EPA 314 INone None Working Capital
Fund
rlne ps
I
:-:1 Cor PATUXENT RIVER NAS ISource Water
Bldg 531
I
No contamination sources. IGroundwater
I
0
I I 1 NO
I
EPA 314 INone IN~
I O&M or Defense
WorI<ing Cap~al
Fund
I I I IO&M or Defense
Navy 1
Marine Corps
IPATUXENT RIVER NAS Isource Water
Bldg 536
No contamination sources. lGroundwater
I 0
I 1
I
NO
I
EPA 314 None None Working Capital
Fund
:~nne1 Corps IPATUXENT RIVER NAS ISource Water

Bldg 575
I
No contamination sources. I Groundwater
I I 0 1
1
NO
I I EPA 314 None INone IO&M or Defense
Working Capital
F!Jnd
--
I
=~ Corps PATUXENT RIVER NAS Isource Water
Bldg 583
I
No contamination sources. I
Groundwater
I 0
I I 1 NO
I
I
EPA 314 None INone IO&M or Defense
Working
Fund
Cap~1
-
I I I I
I I I O&M or Defense
Navy 1
MarineCorJ?s
jPATUXENT RIVER NAS Source Water
Bldg 584
No contamination sources. Groundwater
I I I 0 1 NO EPA 314 None None Working Cap~al
Fund
~avy I I I Io&M or Defense

1 Cor IPATUXENT RIVER NAS
anne ps
ISource Water
Bldg 587
INO contamination sources. Groundwater
I 0
I 1
I NO
I EPA 314 None None Working Cap~al
Fund
-
I I I IO&M or Defense
~aVYI Co IPATUXENTRIVERNAS
arone rps
ISource Water
Bldg 590
No oontamination sources. Groundwaler
I 0
I 1
I NO
I I EPA 314 None None Working Cap~al
Fund
:-:1 Co IPATUXENT RIVER NAS ISource Water I I I I IO&M or Defense

rlne rps Bldg 617
No contamination sources. Groundwaler
I 0
I 2
I NO
1
EPA 314 None None Working Cap~1
Fund
O&M or Defense
:-:1 Cor IPATUXENT RIVER NAS No oontamination sources. NO None Working Cap~al
nne ps
Fund
File: PercData_AIISvcs_May6_
Sheet: Env Restoration-Oeanup, Other • Method 314 reporting Iim~ is 4 ppb Page 28 of 75
Regulatory

Location
Detected
(Media)
I I I I I
Num~r of Number
Samplesof Concentrations
Range of
A naIVI:a
Meth
Interest (Cleanup
• I Potential Pathway(s) of Exposurerequested.

permilling
requirements.
I Funding Type
sampling
requirements)
Navy I IPEARL HARBOR

ILuaJualei Static
Rocket Motor Operational Testing NO None Federal; State I DERP
Marine Corps NAVMAG
Test Facility
Installation
Restoration Site
Navy I
Marine Corps
IPORT HUENEME CBC
14 wells MW01.
I
IMW02. MW03. None has been determined. I
Groundwater
I \I 0 1
I
NO I EPA314
(modifJed) INone IState I DERP
MW04.MW16.
MW17.MW18.
andMW19.
California
Method •
Site 20 - Area A
Determination
Navy I ISUBASE NEW LONDON Iweapons center of Perchlorate INone
Marine Corps CT - Monitoring Well
Groundwater 0 1 NO IFederal; State I DERP
by Ion
2WCMW1S Chr.omalograp
hy
I
California
Navy I
Marine Corps CT
Site 20 - Area A
I SUBASE NEW LONDON Iweapons center
- Monitoring Well
2WCMW2S
I I I I
Groundwater 0 1
1-NO
Detennlnalion
of Perchlorate INone
by Ion
Chromatograp
hy
-
Navy I
Marine Corps CT
Site 20 - Area A
ISUBASE NEW LONDON Iweapons center
- Monitoring Well
I I I I I
Groundwater 0 1
1-NO
California
Detenninalion
of Perchlorate INone IFederal; State I DERP
by Ion
2WCMW3S ChromB!09rap
hy
-
I California
I I I I 1-
Site 20 - Area A Delennination
Navy I ISUBASE NEW LONDON \weapons Cooter
Groundwater 0 1 NO of Perchlorate INone IFederal; State I DERP
Marine Corps CT - Monitoring Well by Ion
2WCMW4D Chromatograp
hy
I California
I I I I 1-
Site 7 - Torpedo Detennination
Navy I \SUBASE NEW LONDON IShoPS 0 2 NO of Perchlorate INone IFederal; State DERP
Groundwater I
Marine Corps CT Monitoring Well by Ion
7MW10S Chromatograp
hy
He: PercData_A1lSvcs_May6_
Sheet: Em Restoration-Cieanup. Other

• Method 314 reporting limit is 4 ppb Page 29 of75
Regulatory
Service I Facility I Site t

Location
Detected
(Media)
I I I I I Number of Range of
Number of Samples Concentrations
A Iyf I
Interest (Cleanup
requested,
: th 1C8 Potentlat Pathway(s) of Exposure permitting
e od requirements,
I Funding Type
sampling
requirements)
,-
I
I
J
California
Site 7 - Torpedo Determination
Navy' ISUBASE NEW LONDON IShoPS-
Marine Corps CT Monitoring Well
7MW11S
IGrOUndwater
I I I 0 1 NO of Perchlorale INone
by Ion
Chromalograp
hy
(Federal; State I DERP
-
Site 7 - Torpedo I I
California
1"-
Delerminaijon
Navy' ISUBASE NEW LONDON IShops-
Marine Corps CT Monitoring Well
7MW5S
Groundwater
I I I· 0 2 NO of Perchlorate INone
by Ion
Chromalograp
hy
Navy'
Marine Corps CT
Site 7 - Torpedo
ISUBASE NEW LONDON \Shops-
Monitoring Well
7MW6S
I I
Groundwater
I I I 0 1 NO ,-
California
Determination
by Ion
Chromalograp
hy
Navy'
Marine Corps CT
Site 7 • Torpedo
ISUBASE NEW LONDON Shops -
IMonitorlng Well
7MW7S
I I I
Groundwater 0
I I 1 NO ,-
California
Determination
by Ion
,-
Chromalograp
hy
Navy'
Marine Corps CT
Site 7 - Torpedo
ISUBASE NEW LONDON Shops -
I
Monitoring Well
I I I I
Groundwater 0 1 , NO
CalWomia
Determination
of Perchlorate INone IFederal; Slale I DERP
by Ion
7MW8S Chromalograp
hy
Site 7 - Torpedo I I 1
California
Determination
Navy' ISUBASE NEW LONDON IShoPS -
Marine Corps CT Monitqring Well
7MW9S
Groundwater
I 0
I I 1 NO of Perchlorate INone
by Ion
Chromalograp
-
hy
IFederal; Slate I DERP
Navy'
Marine Corps CT
Site 7 - Torpedo
ISUBASE NEW LONDON IShops-
Temporary Well
I I I I I
Groundwater 0 1 NO
1
California
Determination
of Perchlorate INone IFederal; Slate I DERP
by Ion
7TW10 Chromalograp
hy
File: PercDala_AJISvcs_May6_
Regulatory

Location
Detected
(Media)
I I I I .I
Numb~r of Number of Range of
DetectIons Collected Detected (ppb)
A;a~,cal
et od
Interest (Cleanup
reque&ed,
requirements,
I Funding Type
sampling
requirements)
I I~
I
California
J I
I
Sfte 7 - Torpedo Determination
Navy! ISUBASE NEW LONDON IShops
Marine Corps CT Temporary Well
7TW8
IGrouOOwater
I 0 1
I
ND of Perchlorate None
by Ion
Chromatograp
-- hy
I I I California
~-
I
Sfte 7 - Torpedo Determination
Navy! ISUBASE NEW LONDON Shops -
Marir1l1 Corps CT ITemporary Well
7TW9
Groundwater 0
I 1
I NO of Perchlorate INone
by Ion
Chromatograp
hy
I I I I I I
Investigation
Navy! /VALLEJO CA MARE IS

Marine Corps NSY
IArea Fl, Former
Production
Manufach.u"ing
IStorage I Groundwater I 0 I 11 I NO I EPA 314 INone IState I BRAC
Area (PMA)
Potential pathway under residential

Navy! IWhite Oak Surface 1~7GroundwaterO DemUitarization/Disposal Groundwater 4 4 12.0 -16.0 E300.0 reuse scenario if residents access IFederal; State I BRAC
groundwater for potable use.
Navy! I
White Oak Surface

Marine Corps Warfare certer
07Groundwaterl
01
DemilftarizationiDisposal Groundwater 2 3 ND-9.4 E300.0
reuse scenario if residents access IFederal; State I BRAC
9roundwater for potable use.
Navy! Whfte Oak Surface 07Groundwaterl

DemUftarization/Disposal Groundwater 0 4 ND E300.0 None IFederal; State I BRAG
MarineCorps Warfare Center 02

Navy! Whfte Oak Surface 07Groundwater1
Marine Corps Warfare center 03
Demilftarization/Disposal Groundwater 2 4 NO -29.0 E300.0 reuse scenario if residents access IFederal; State I BRAC
Navy I IWhfte Oak Surface

I:Gro~ndwaterl IDemilftarization/Disposal I
Groundwater
I I I 4 5 ND - 13.3
I
E300.0 Ireuse scenario if residents access IFederal; State
groundwamrror pmable use.
I BRAC
Navy I IWhite Oak Surface

I I
: Groundwater1 DemilftarizationiDisposal I
Groundwater
I I I 3 3 8.0 -9.9
I
E300.0 lreuse scenario if residents access (Federal; State
I BRAC
Navy I IWhite Oak Surface 07Groundwater4

Demilitarization/Disposal Groundwater
1 5 NO-53 E300.0 reuse scenario if residents access (Fedel'al; State I BRAe
Marine Corps Warfare Center 1
groundwater for pmable use.
Navy I I
s ~hite Oak Surface
~7Groundwater4 DemilftarizationlDisposai Groundwater 0 6 NO E300.0 None IFederal; State I BRAC
Sheet: Env Restoration-Cleanup, other

• Method 314 reporting limft is 4 ppb Page 31 of 75
Location
Detected
(MedIa)
;:
e
=
A I . I
Regulatory
Interest (Cleanup
requested.
requirements.
sampling
requirements)
I Funding Type
I J I I J I I
Navy! While Oak Surlace
Marine Corps
Warfare Center
07PZ42 1000BKarizationIDispoSai I
Groundwater 1 0 r 3 I NO E300.0 INane Federal; State
,
BRAC
Navy! White Oak Surface
Marine Corps
Warfare center
02Groundwater1 NA
02
Groundwater 0 4 NO E300.0 I Nona IFederal; State I BRAC
Navy! While Oak Surface

02Groundwater1 E300.0; EPArN
03
NA Groundwater 0
\
4 NO 314 one IFederal; State I BRAC

02Groundwater1 E300.0; EPA IN
Marine Corps
Warfare Center 04
NA Groundwater 0 4 NO
314 I one
IFederal; State r BRAC

02Groundwater1 NA E300.0; EPAIN
Groundwater 0 4 NO 314 one IFederal; State I BRAe
Marine Corps
Warfare Center 05

02Groundwater3 NA Groundwater 0 4 NO E300.0 INane IFederal; State I BRAC
Marine Corps
Wariare Center 0

02Groundwater3 E300.0; EPAIN
Marine Corps
Warfare center 1
314 I one
IFederal; State I BRAC

02Groundwater3 E300.0; EPAIN
2
NA Groundwater 0 4 NO 314 one IFederal; State I BRAC
MarineCorps
Warfare Center
Navy! WhKe Oak Surface
Marine Corps
Warfare Center
02Groundwater4
5
NA Groundwater 0 4 NO E300.0; EPA'N
314 one ,Federal; State ,
BRAC
Navy! Whle Oak Surface

02Groundwater7 E300.0; EPA!N
NA Groundwater 0 4 NO 314 one IFederal; State I BRAC
Marine Corps
Warfare Center 6
Navy! WhRe Oak Surface 02SB1OO!2Grour

E300.0; EPA
Marine Corps
Warfare Center dwaterl00
314
None IFederal; State I BRAC

Navy! WhRe Oak Surface 02SB101/2Grour
E300.0; EPA
NA Groundwater 1 4 NO - 5.9 reuse scenario if residents access IFederal; State I BRAC
Marine Corps
Warfare Center dwater101 314
Navy! White Oak Surface 03GrOlndwaler1

NA
Groundwater 0 5 NO E300.0 None IFederal; State I BRAC
MarineCorps
Warfare Center 02
Navy! WhRe Oak Surface 03Groundwater1!NA

IGroundwater I 0 I 3 I NO I E300.0 INane IFederal; State I BRAC
Navy! WhRe Oak Surface 03Groundwater1 INA

Marine Corps Warfare carter 07
Navy! WhRe Oak Surface 03Groundwaterl INA

File: PercDatafiISvcs_Mav6_
Sheet: Env Restoratioo-Oeanup, Other

• Method 314 reporting IimR is 4 ppb Page 32 of 75
Regulatory

Location
Detected
(Media)
I I I I ::z:: I
A • I
Interest (Cleanup
requested.
requirements,
I Funding Type
sampling
requirements)
Navy! Wh~e Oak Surface

NA NO None Federal; Slate I BRAC
---
Navy! White Oak Surface 03Groundwater1 INA
IGroundwater I 0 I 5 I NO I E300.0 INone IFederal; State I BRAC
Navy! W~e Oak Surface 03Groundwater4\NA

IGroundwater I 0 I (
3 I NO I E300.0 INone (Federal; Slate I BRAC
Navy! W~ Oak Surface 1~3GrOundwater7lNA IGroundwater I 0 I 3 I • NO I E300.0 INone IFederal; State I BRAC
Navy! W~e Oak Surface 103Groundwater7

1NA IGroundwater I 0 I 5 I NO I E3oo.0 INone IFederal; Stale I BRAC
Navy! W~e Oak Surface 103GrOUndwater7

Marine Corps Warfare Center 8S
1NA IGroundwater I 0 I 5 I NO I E300.0 INone (Federal; State I BRAC

103SP201 INA IGroundwater I 0 I 2 I NO I E300.0 INone IFederal; State I BRAC
Navy! W~e Oak Surface

03SP202 INA IGroundwater I 0 I 1 I NO I E3oo.0 INone 1Federal; State I BRAC
Navy! W~e Oak Surface 03Surface

Marine Corps Warfare Center Water102
INA ISurface Water I 0 1 2 I NO I E300.0 INone IFederal; State I BRAC
Navy! W~e Oak Surface I~GrOUndwaler1INA IGroundwater I 0 I 2 I NO I E3oo.0 INone IFederal; State I BRAC
Navy! Wh~e Oak Surface 04Groundwater1 INA

(Groundwater ( 0 I 3 I NO I E3oo.0 INane IFederal; State I BRAC
Navy! W~e oak Surface 04Groundwater1

lNA IGroundwater I 0 I 2 I NO I E3oo.0 INane IFederal; State r BRAC
Navy! W~e Oak Surface I04GrOUndwaterl INA

Navy! W~e Oak Surface I04GrOundwaterl INA

Navy! W~e Oak Surface I~GroundwaterllNA IGroundwater I 0 I 3 J NO I E300.0 INone IFederal: State I BRAC
Navy! WhRe Oak Surface I04GrOUndwaterl INA

IGroundwater I 0 I 7 I NO I E3oo.0 INane IFederal; State I BRAC
Sheet: Env Restoraliof}-Cleanup, Other • Method 314 reporting lim~ is 4 ppb Page 33 of 75
Regulatory

Location
Detected
(Media)
I I I I;at:: I Number of Range of
Number of Semples Concentrations
Datectlons Collected Detected (ppb)
A
e
I I
Interest (Cleanup
requested.
requirements.
I Funding Type
sampling
requirements)
I I I I I I I
:GrOUndwater1lNA I Groundwater
I I I 0 3 NO I E300.0 I None Federal; Slate I BRAC
Navy! WMe Oak Surface 04Groundwater'\NA

IGroundwater I 0 I 3 I NO \ E300.0 INone IFederal; Slate I BRAC
Navy! While Oak Surface 04Groundwater1 \NA

IGroundwater I' 0 I 5 I NO I E300.0 INone IFederal; State I BRAC
Navy! While Oak Surface 04Groundwater1 INA

IGroundwater I 0 I 4 I· NO I E300.0 INone IFederal; State I BRAC
Navy! While Oak Surface 04Groundwater'\NA

IGroundwater I 0 I 2 I NO I E300.0 INone IFederal; Slate I BRAC
Navy! While Oak Surface 04Groundwater1 INA

Navy! Whfte Oak Surface 04Groundwater1 INA

IGroundwater I 0 \ 3 I NO I E300.0 INone IFederal; State I BRAC
Navy! Whfte Oak Surface 04Groundwater1 NA

Groundwater 0 3 NO E300.0 None !Federal; State I BRAC

Navy I Whfte Oak Surface 04Groundwater1
NA Groundwater 2 3 NO-76.0 E300.0 reuse scenario if residents access !Federal; State I BRAC
groundwater lor potable use.
Navy! White Oak Surface 04Groundwater2 NA

Navy I While Oak Surface 04Groundwater2\NA

Navy! While Oak Surface 04Groundwater2 NA

1 IGroundwater I 0 I 2 I NO I E300.0 INone IFederal; State I BRAC
02 .'
Navy I Wh~e Oak Surface I~GrOundwater4INA IGroundwater I 0 I 3 I NO I E300.0 INone IFederal; State I BRAC
Navy! Whfte Oak Surface 04Groundwater4 NA


Navy I While Oak Surface 04Groundwater5
NA Groundwater 1 6 NO-9.3 E300.0 reuse scenario if residents access IFederal; State I BRAC
Fie: PercOatafiISvcs_May6_
Sheet: Env Restoraliof}-Cleanup. Other • Method 314 reporting lim~ is 4 ppb Page 34 0175
"\;,-"
Regulatory

Equipment, Activities} I
Location
Detected
(Media)
I I I I .I
~a~:1
e
Interest {Cleanup
requested,
requirements,
I Funding Type
sampling
requirements)
I I I I I I I
Navy!
White Oak Surface
Marine Corps
Warfare Center
04GrOllndwater51NA
2
IGroundwater 1 0 1 4 I NO I E300.0 lNone Federal; State I BRAC
Navy!
WhRe Oak Surface 04Groundwater1 NA
Marine Corps
Warfare Center 9
\ Potential pathway under residential

Navy!
White Oak Surface 04Groundwater8
NA Groundwater 3 4 NO -10.0 E300.0 reuse scanario if r""idents access IFederal; State I BRAC'
0
Navy!
White Oak Surface 04Groundwater8 NA
Marine Corps
Warfare Center 10
Navy!
White Oak Surface 04Groundwater8 INA
Marine Corps
Warfare Center 15
IGroundwater I 0 I 3 I NO J E300.0 INone IFederal; State I BRAC
Navy!
White Oak Surface
Marine Corps
Warfare Center
04Groundwater8 INA
2
IGroundwater I 0 I 3 , NO I E300.0 INone IFederal: State I BRAC
Navy!
While Oak Surface
04PZ89 INA IGroundwater I 0 I 4 I NO' I E300.0 INone IFederal: State I BRAC
MarineCorps
Warfare Center
Navy!
WhRe Oak Surface 05GroundwaterO INA
MarineCaps
Warfare Center 1
IGroundwater I 0 I 3 I NO I E300.0 INone IFederal; Stale I BRAC
Navy!
WhRe Oak Surface 05GroundwaterO INA
Marine Corps
Warfare Center 2
Navy!
White Oak Surface 08Groundwaler3 INA
Marine Corps
Warfare Center 3
Navy!
While Oak Surface 08Groundwater3,NA
Marine Corps
Warfare Center 4
Navy!
While Oak Surface 08Groundwater3 NA
Marine Corps
Warfare Center
5 .'
Navy!
WhRe Oak Surface 08Groundwater3,NA
MarineCorps
Warfare Center 6
Navy!
While Oak Surface 08GrOUndwater5 NA
MarineCorps
Warfare Center 3
Navy!
White Oak Surface 13GroundwaterO INA
1
Marine Corps
Warfare Center
Navy!
White Oak Surface 13GroundwaterO INA
Marine Corps
Warfare Center 2
FRe: PercOata_AIISvcs_May6_
SMa\: Env Restoration-Cleanup, Other • Method 314 reporting IimR is 4 ppb Page 35 of 15
Regulatory

Location
Detected
(Media)
I I I I ;:u, I
DetectIons Collected Detected (ppb) 0
'~
A Iyf aI
Interest (Cleanup
requested.
Potential Pathway(s) of Exposure p8rn1itling
requirements.
I Funding Type
sampling
requirements)

13GroundwaterO INA
3
I I I I I I
Groundwater 0 5 NO E300.0 None I
Federal; State I BRAC
Navy! While Oak Surface 13GroundwaterO INA

MarineCorps Warfare Center 4
IGroundwater I 0 I 4 I NO I E3oo.0 INone !Federal; Stale I BRAC
Navy ! While Oak Surface 13Groundwater2 NA

1 IGroundwater I 0 \I 3 I NO I E3oo.0 INone IFederal; State I BRAC
Navy! While Oak Surface 13Groundwater2- NA

Marine Corps Warfare Center 04 1 JGroundwater I 0 I 1 I, NO I EPA 314 INone IFederal; State I BRAC
--
Navy! While Oak Surface I~Groundwater21NA IGroundwater I 0 I 2 I NO I EPA 314 INone IFederal; State I BRAC

120WP01 INA IGroundwater I 0 I 2 I NO I E3oo.0 INone IFederal; State I BRAC

120WP02 INA IGroundwater I 0 I 1 I NO 1 E300.0 INone IFederal; State I BRAC

I20WP03 INA IGroundwater I 0 I 1 I NO I E3oo.0 INone IFederal; State I BRAC
---
Navy ! IWhile Oak Surface
135WP01 INA IGroundwater 1 0 I 1 I NO I E3oo.0 INone IFederal; State I· BRAC
---
I35WP02 INA IGroundwater I 0 I 1 I NO I E300.0 INone IFederaJ; State I BRAC

35WP03 NA Groundwater 0 1 NO E300.0 None IFederal; State I BRAC

40WP01 NA Groundwater 1 1 42.0 E300.0 reuse scenario if residents access IFederal; State I BRAC

47WP01 NA Groundwater 1 1 6.0 E3oo.0 r&Use scenario if residents access IFederal; State I BRAC

47WP02 NA Groundwater 0 1 NO E300.0 None IFederal; State I BRAC

147WP05 INA IGroundwater I 0 I 2 I NO I E300.0 INone IFederal; State I BRAC
L-
FHe: PercOata_AlISvcs_May6_
SI_I: Env Restoration-Cleanup, Other

• Method 314 reporting limit is 4 ppb Page 36 of 75
Regulatory

Location
Detected
(Media)
I I I I .I
I
Interest (Cleanup
requested.
A : : Potential Pathway(s) of Exposure permitting
e requirements.
I Funding Type
sampling
requirements)
I I I I I I I
Navy!
While Oak Surface
Marine Corps
Warfare Center
~roundwater21NA I Groundwater I I 0 1 I NO
I EPA 314 1None IFederal; State I BRAC
Navy!
Whie Oak Surface 49GrOUndwaler2
Marine Corps
Warfare Center 010
INA IGroundwater I 0 I 1 I NO I EPA 314 INone IFederal; Stale I BRAC
Navy!
Whie Oak Surface 49Groundwater2 .I
Marine Corps
Warfare Center 01S
lNA IGroundwater I 0 1 I NO I EPA 314 INone IFederal; State I BRAC
Navy!
While Oak Surface 49Groundwater2
Marine Corps
Warfare Center 02S
INA IGroundwater I 0 I 2 I· NO I EPA 314 INone IFederal; State I BRAC
Navy!
While Oak SUrface 49Groundwater2\NA
Marine Corps
Warfare Center 03
IGroundwater \ 0 I 1 I NO I EPA 314 INone IFederal; State I BRAC
Navy!
While Oak SUrface 49Groundwater2,NA
Marine Corps
Warfare Center 04
IGroundwater I 0 I 1 I NO I EPA 314 INane IFederal; State I BRAC
Navy!
While Oak Surface
500ST01 INA IGroundwater I 0 I 1 I NO I EPA 314 INane IFederal; Stale I BRAC
Navy! Whtte Oak Surface SOOSurface

Marine Corps Warfare Center WaterSEEP
INA ISurface Water I 0 I 1 I NO I E300.0 INane IFederal; State I BRAC
Navy ! While Oak Surface

IS7WP01 INA IGroundwater I 0 I 1 I NO I E300.0 INane IFederal; State I BRAC

IS7WP02 INA IGroundwater I 0 I 1 I NO I E300.0 INane IFederal; State I BRAC
Navy! WhttB Oak Surface

187WP03 INA IGroundwater I 0 I 1 I NO I E300.0 INane tFederal; State I BRAC
Navy! Whtte Oak Surface

IA-01 INA IGroundwater I 0 I 2 I NO I E300.0 INane IFederal; State I BRAC

IA-02 INA IGroundwater I 0 I 2 I NO I E300.0 INane IFederal; State I BRAC

IA-03 INA IGroundwater I 0 I 2 I NO I E300.0 INone IFederal; State I BRAC
Navy! Whtte Oak Surface o.

IA-04 INA IGroundwater I I 2 I NO I E300.0 INane IFederal; State I BRAe

IARL-502 SUMP INA IGroundwater I 0 I 2 I NO I E300.0 INone IFederal; State I BRAC
Sr-!; Env Restoration-Cleanup. Other • Method 314 reporting limtt is 4 ppb Page 37 of 75
Regulatory

Location
Detected
(Media)
I I I I I
Dateetlons Collected Detected (ppb)
~::::
A I • I
Interest (Cleanup
Potential Palhway(s) of Exposure ~ilting

requested,
requirements.
I Funding Type
sampling
Irequirements)
Navy/ White Oak Surface E300.0;EPA

Potential pathway under residential I
ARL-STS-AS NA Groundwater 2 15 NO' -4.0
314
reuse ~io if residents access Federal; Stele I BRAC
Navy/ White Oak Suiace

ARL-STS--AS NA Other 0 3 NO EPA 314 None IFederal; State I BRAC
Navy/ White Oak Surface

ARL-STS-INF NA Groundwater 0 1 NO E300.0 None IFederal; Slate I BRAC

Navy/ Wh~e Oak Surface E300.0;EPA
ARL-STS-oF NA Groundwater 3 23 NO' 7.0 reuse scenario if residents access IFederal; State I BRAC
Navy/ White Oak Slriace

ARL-STS-oF NA Other 0 3 NO EPA 314 None IFederal; State I BRAC
Navy/ Wh~e Oak Surface

IARL-SUMP INA IOther I 0 I 4 I NO I EPA 314 INone JFederal; State I BRAC
--
Navy/ White Oak Surface E300.0; EPA
ARL-SUMP NA Groundwater 0 13 NO
314
None (Federal; State I BRAC

Navy/ White Oak Surface ARL-Surface E300.0; EPA
Marine Corps Warfare Center WaterS-AS
NA Surface Water 3 10 NO' - 4.5
314
IWh~e Oak Surface

I I
Navy /
IARL-Surface
WaterS-AS INA Groundwater
I 6
I I 8 NO' - 5.8
I EPA 314 reuse scenario if residents access IFederal; State
I BRAC
Navy / IWhite Oak Surface

Marine Corps Warfare Genter
IARL-Surface
WaterS-INF INA I
Surface Water
I 3
I g
I NO'-11.0 I E300 . EPA Potential pathway under residential
3~4 Ireuse scenario if residents acCess IFederal; State I BRAC

,'
IARL-Surface
WaterS--INF INA I
Groundwater
I I I 5 8 NO' - 8.0
I
rotential pathway under residential
EPA 314 reuse scenario if residents access IFederal; State
I BRAC

Marine Corps Warfare Genter
IARL-SUrface
WalerS-oF INA ISurface Water
I 10
I 17
I NO' -7.0 I ~~4
E30 . EPA Potential pathway under residential
Ireuse scenario if residents access IFederal; State I BRAC
I I I
IARL-surface
WalerS-oF INA Groundwater
I I I 8 11 NO' -8.4 EPA 314 reuse scenario if residents access IFederal; State
I BRAC
F~e: PercData..AJlSvcs_May6_
Sheet: Env Restoration-Oeanup, Other • Method 314 reporting lim~ is 4 ppb Page 38 of 75
Regulatory

Location
Detected
(Media)
I I I I I
samples Concentrations
A
~aJ:~al
e
•
Interest (Cleanup
requemed,
requirements.
I Funding Type
sampling
requirements)

B-1 NA Groundwater 0 3 NO E300.0 None Federal; State I BRAC
Navy! Whne Oak Surface

IMarine Corps Warfare Center
B-3 INA IGroundwater I 0 I 1 I NO I E300.0 INone IFederal; State I BRAC
Navy! W~e Oak Surface BGGroundwater NA ,
Groundwater 0 2 NO E300.0 None IFederal; State J BRAC


Navy! WhRe Oak Surface BGGroundwater
NA Groundwater 1 2 ND-ll.0 E300.0 reuse scenario if residents access (Federal; State I BRAC
Navy! W~e Oak Surface BGroundwaterl0 NA

Marine Corps Warfare Center OIBG
Navy! WhRe Oak Surface BGroundwaterl0 INA

Marine Corps Warfare Center llBG
IGroundwater I 0 I 2 I NO I E300.0 INone IFederal; State ( BRAC
Navy! Whne Oak Surface BGroundwaterl0 NA

Marine Corps Warfare Center 2/BG
Groundwater 0 2 NO E300.0 None (Federal; State I BRAC

C.Q5 NA Groundwater 6 6 14.2 - 71.0 E300.0 reuse scenario if residents access IFederal; State I BRAC
Navy! WhRe Oak Surface E300.0; EPA

e-06 NA Groundwater 0 20 NO
314
None IFederal; State I BRAC

Navy! WMe Oak Surface E300.0; EPA
C.Q7 NA Groundwater 1 15 NO· - 5.0 reuse scenario if residents access IFederal; State I BRAC
Navy! WMe Oak Surface

C.Q8 NA Groundwater 0 2 NO E300.0 None IFederal; State I BRAC
--
C.Q9 NA Groundwater 0 2 NO E300.0 None IFederal; State I BRAC

C-l0 NA Groundwater 1 2 NO -7.4 E300.0 reuse scenario if residents access IFederal; State I BRAC

C-11 NA Groundwater 0 2 NO E300.0 None IFederal; Slate I BRAC

Marine Corps Warfare Center 1C-12 INA I~roundwater I 0 I 2 I NO J E300.0 INone IFederal; State I BRAC
Fie: PercOata_AIISvCS_May6_
Sheet: Env RestoratiorK;leanup, Other

• Method 314 reporting limn is 4 ppb Page 39 ot 75
Regulatory

Location
Detected
(Media)
I I I I I
Number of Number 01 Range
Detoctions Samples ConcentratIons
~I Analytical
Interest (Cleanup
requested.
requirements.
I Funding Type
sampling
requirements)
Navy/ While Oak Surface

1C-13 INA I I
I
I
Groundwater 0 2 NO I E300.0 I None IFederal; State I BRAC

1C-14 INA IGroundwater I
0 J 5 I NO I E300.0 INone (Federal; Stale I BRAC

Marine Corp! Warfare Center
1C-15 INA IGroundwater I
0 'I 2 I NO I E300.0 INone IFederal; State J BRAC
Navy/ While Oak Surface E300.0; EPA

CHARLTON NA Groundwater 5 15 NO' -9.7
314
(Federal; State I BRAC

Navy/ Wlile Oak Surface E300.0; EPA
EW01 NA Groundwater 4 22 NO' - 19.0 reuse scenario If residents access (Federal; Stale ( BRAC
-
Navy / I
White Oak Surface

I EW02 INA I
Groundwater
I
I 18 20
I NO' -19.0
I E300.0· EPA(otential palhway under residential
314 reuse scenario If residents access (Federal; State I BRAC
I E300.0· EPA (otential pathway under residential

leW03 INA !Groundwater
I
I 19 20
I NO' -14.8 314 reuse scenario il residents access (Federal; State
I BRAC
I I E300.0· EPA (olential pathway under residential

EW04 INA IGroundwater
I
I 5 23
I NO' -6.0 314 reuse scenario If residents access IFederal; State
groundwater lor potable use
I BRAC
I
I I
E300 O· EPA Potential palhway under residential
Navy / While Oak Surface
Marine Corps Warfare Center IEW05 INA IGrOUndwater
I
3
I I 21 NO' -8.7 314 reuse scenario If residents access IFederal; State
I BRAC

Navy / IWh~e Oak Surface E300.0; EPA
IEW06 NA Groundwater 20 21 NO' -12.0 reuse scenario If residents access IFederal; Stale I BRAC
(p-5urlaCe
Navy / IWhile Oak Surface
Water/Sediment- NA Surface Water 0 1 NO E300.0 None IFederal; State I BRAC
01
HP-5urlace
Navy / IWh~e Oak Surface
IWater/Sediment-INA ISurface Water I 0 I 1 I NO I E300.0 INone IFederal; State I BRAC
02
Navy / I
White Oak Surface

Marine Corps Warfare Cetter
HP-5urlace
lWater/Sediment- NA Surface Water 0 1 NO E300.0 None IFederal; State I BRAC
03

Navy / IWh~e Oak Surface E300.0; EPA
Marine Corps Warfare Center IIRBV-TAP NA Groundwater 1 34 NO' - 4.0
314
reuse scenario If residents access IFederal; State I BRAC
9roundwater lor potable use.
F~e: PercOata_A1ISvcs_May6_
Sheet: Env Restoration-Cleanup. Other • Method 314 reporting lim~ is 4 ppb Page 400175
Regulatory

EqUipment. Activities) I
Location
Detected
(Media)
I I I I:u.: I
A Iyf aI reqUested,
Int.rest (Cleanup

reqUIrements,
t Funding Type
sampling
requirements)
J I I I I I I J
LIGHTFOOT rNA IGroundwater I I I 0 1 NO I I E300.0
None IFederal; Stale I BRAC
Navy! While Oak Surface OU2Surface

MarineCorps Warfare Center Waler01
INA ISurface Water I 0 I 2 I NO I EPA 314
INone IFederal; Stale I BRAC

INA ISurface Water I 0 \I 1 I NO I EPA 314
INone IFederal; Stale I BRAC

OU2Surface
Water03
INA 'Surface Water I 0 I 1 , ' NO , EPA 314 INone IFederal; Slate I BRAC
Navy! Whfte Oak Surface OU2Surface

MarineCorps Warfare Center Waler04
INA ISurface Water I 0 I 1 I NO I EPA 314 INone IFederal; Slate I BRAC

Marine Corps Warfare Center Waler05
INA ISurface Waler I 0 I 1 I NO I EPA 314 INone IFederal; Stale I BRAC
Navy! WhiteOak Surface

OU2Surface
Water06
INA ISurface Waler I 0 I 1 I NO ,
EPA 314 INone IFederal; Slate I BRAC
Navy! While Oak Surface PBSurface

Marine Corps Warfare Center Waler200
INA ISurface Waler I 0 I 1 I NO I E300.0 INone IFederal; State I BRAC

PBSurface
Water201
INA ISurface Water , 0 I 2 , NO
I E300.0 INone !Federal; Slate I BRAC
Navy! White Oak Surface PBSurface

INA 'Surface Water I 0 ( 1 ( NO
I E300.0 INone [Federal; Slale I BRAC

INA ISurface Water I 0 I 1 I NO
I E300.0 INone IFederal; Slale I BRAC

INA 'Surface Waler I 0 I 1 I NO
I EPA314 INone (Federal; Slate I BRAC
Navy! Whne Oak Surface PBSurface

INA 'Surface Water I 0 I 2 I NO
I EPA 314 INone IFederal; Slate I BRAC
Navy! Whfte Oak Surface PBSurface

NA Surface Water 0 1 NO
EPA 314 None IFederal; Slate I BRAC

Navy ! While Oak Surface
Q·WP-01 NA Groundwater 1 1 6.0 E3000 reuse scenario if residents access IFederal; Slale I BRAC
MarineCorps Warfare Certer

Q-WP-02 NA Groundwater 0 1 NO E300.0 None IFederal; State I BRAC
Fne: PercOata_AIISvC8_May6_
St_t: Env RestoratiOn-Cleanup, Other • Method 314 reporting limn is 4 ppb Page 41 of 75
Regulatory

Location
Detected
(Media)
I I I I I
Number of Number
Range of
Detections Collected Detected (ppb) Method
Interest (Cfearup
A naIytIcaI Potential Pathway(s) of Exposur,requested'

permitting
requirements,
I Funding Type
sampling
I I I I I , I I
requirements)
~NaVYJ Whtte·Oak Surface

IWOS-0101 INA Iwaste Water I I I 0 1 NO I EPA 314 INone Federal; State I BRAC

IWOS-0104 INA IWaste Water I 0 , 1 I NO I EPA 314 INone IFederal; State I BRAC
Navy! Whtte Oak Surface

IWOs-0402 INA (Waste Water I 0 \
I 1 I NO I EPA 314 INone IFederal; State I BRAC

IWOS-0602 INA 'Waste Water I 0 , 1 I, NO ( EPA 314 INone IFederal; State I BRAC

IWOS-072A INA I Other I 0 I 1 I NO I EPA 314 INone 'Federal; State I BRAC

W05-PS02 NA IWaste Water I 0 I 2 I NO I EPA314 INone IFederal; State I BRAC

jMarine Corps Warfare Center
09DP223
Research. Development. Test and
Evaluation
,Groundwater , 0 I 1 I NO I EPA 314 INone IFederal; State I BRAC
Navy! Whtte Oak Surface Research. Development. Test and

09DP224
Evaluation
IGroundwater I 0 I 1 I NO I EPA 314 INone IFederal; State I BRAC
Navy! White Oak Surface Research. Development, Test and

IMarine Corps Warfare Center 09DP225
Evaluation
,Groundwater I 0 I 1 I NO t EPA 314 INone IFederal; State I BRAC
I~avy ! White Oak Surface

09DP226
Evaluation
Groundwater 0 1 NO EPA 314 None IFederal; State I BRAC

Navy! White Oak Surface Research, Development, Test and
09DP227 Groundwater 1 1 192.0 EPA 314 reuse scenario if residents access IFederal; State I BRAC
Marine Corps Warfare Center Evaluation
-
Navy! 'White Oak Surface
I09DP228
IResearch. Development. Test and
Evaluation
I
Groundwater
I 1
, 1
I 108.0
I
EPA 314 Ireuse scenario if residents access 'Federal; State
I BRAC
Navy! IWhite Oak Surface

I09DP229
I Research, Development, Test and
Evaluation
I
Groundwater
I I I 1 1 218.0
I I
EPA 314 reuse scenario if residents access IFederal; State I BRAC
Navy! IWhtte Oak Surface

j09DP231
Evaluation
I
Groundwater
I 1
, 1
I 24.1
I
EPA 314 Ireuse scenario if residents access IFederal; State
I BRAC
Fae: PercData_AIISvcs_Ma~_
Sheet: Env Restoratio~Clearup. Other

• Method 314 reparling Iimtt is 4 ppb Page 42 of 75
Regulatory
Service I Facility , Site I

Source of Perchlorate (Operallons.
Location
Detected
(Media)
I I I I I
~'~~al
et
Interest (Cleanup
requested.
requirements.
I Funding Type
sampling
requirements)
Navy! IWhile Oak Surface

1090P232
Evaluation
I Groundwater
I 1
I I 1 28.0
I
EPA 314 Ireuse fCllnario if residents access Federal; State I BRAC

1090P233
Evaluation .
Groundwaler 1 1 13.0
EPA 314 reuse scenafio if residents access IFederal; State I BRAC
, groundwater lor potable use.
Navy! While Oak Surface Research. Development. Test and

090P234 Groundwater 0 1 ND EPA314 None IFederal; Siale I BRAC
Mari~Corps Warfare Center Evaluation
Navy! While Oak Surface Research. Development. Test and

09DP235 Groundwaler 0 1 ND EPA 314 None IFederal; Stale I BRAe
Navy! White Oak Surface Research. Development. Test and

09DP236 Groundwater 1 1 51.3 EPA 314 reuse scenario if residents access IFederal; Slate I BRAC
Potential palhway under residential

Navy! IWhile Oak Surface 09GroundwaterO Research. Developmenl. Test and E3oo.0; EPA
Groundwater 9 11 ND' -798.0 reuse scenafio if residents access IFederal; State I BRAC
Marine Corps Warfare Center 1 Evaluation 314
Navy! While Oak Surface 09GroundwaterO Research, Development. Test and

Groundwater 0 4 ND E3oo.0 None (Federal; Slate I BRAC
Marine Corps Warfare Center 2 Evaluation
Navy! While Oak Surface 09GroundwaterO Research, Development. Test and

Groundwaler 1 3 ND - 5.0 E3oo.0 reuSe scenario if residents access IFederal; State I BRAC

Marine Corps Warfare Gente<
09GroundwaterO Research. Development, Test and
4 Evaluation
Groundwaler 1 3 ND-11.2 E3oo.0
9roundwaler for potable use.
Navy! While Oak Surface 09GroundwaterO Research, Development, Test and

Groundwater 0 3 ND E3000 None IFederal; Stale I BRAC
Navy! While Oak Surface 09GroundwaterO Research, Development, Tesl and

Marine Corps War1are Center S Evaluation
(Groundwater I 0 I 7 ( ND I E3OO0 (None IFederal; Stale I BRAC
Navy! White Oak Surface 09GroundwaterO Research, Development, Test and

(Groundwater ( 0 I 3 ( ND I E3oo.0 INone IFederal; State I BRAC
Navy! While Oak Surface 09Groundwaterl Research. Development. Test and

Groundwater o. 3 ND E300.0 None IFederal; Siale I BRAG
Navy! White Oak Surface 09Groundwaterl Research. Development. Test and

Groundwater 1 5 ND -7.0 E300.0 reuse scenario if residents access (Federal; State I BRAC
01 Evaluation
File: PercData_AJlSvcs_May6_
Sheet: Env Resloralion-C1eanup, other

, Method 314 reporting limit is 4 ppb Page 43 of 75
Regulatory

Location
Detected
(Media)
Anal cal
Interest (Cleanup
requested,
Me;:'od Potential Pathway(s) of Exposure permitting
requirements,
I Funding Type .
sampling
requirements)
Navy! White Oak Surface 09Groundwater1 Research. Development. Test and

Groundwater 0 4 NO EJOO.O None Federal; Slate I BRAC
I
Potential paI/1way lIOder residential

Groundwater 2 7 NO -11.5 E300.0 reuse scenario if residents access IFederal; Slate I BRAC

Groundwater 0 3 NO E300.0 None IFederal; Slate I BRAC
Potential patllNay under residential

Navy! While Oak Surface 09GrOUndwater1 Research. Development. Test and
Navy! White Oak Surface 09Groundwater1 Research, Development. Test and

Navy! While Oak Surface 09GrOUndwater1 Research. Development. Test and

Navy! While Oak Surface 09Groundwater1 Research. Development. Test and


Groundwater 1 3 NO -4.0 E300.0 reuse scenario if residents access IFederal; State I BRAC

Groundwater 3 3 7.0 - 8.0 E300.0 reuse scenario if residents access IFederal; State I BRAC


MarineCorps Warfare Center OOS ..
09Groundwater2 Research. Development. Test and
Evaluation
IGroundwater I 0 I 2 I NO I E300.0 INone (Federal; State I BRAC

IGroundwater I 0 I 2 I NO I E300.0 INone IFederal; Slate I BRAC

Marine Corps Warfare Center 01S Evaluation
Groundwater 0 2 NO E300.0 None (Federal; State I BRAC

Groundwater 1 1 4.9 EPA 314 reuse scenario if residents access (Federal; State I BRAC
Fde; PereOata_AJISvcs_May6_
Sheet: Env Restoralion-Oeanup. Other • Mettxxl314 repor1ing Iimil is 4 ppb Page 44 0175
I =I
Regulatory
SeNice I Facility I Site I

Location
Detected
(Media)
I I Number of J
Range of
A I • I
::
e
Interest (Cleanup
r equested.
requirements.
I Funding Type
sampling
requirements)
Navy! While Oak Surlace 09Groundwater2 Research. Development. Test and

Groundwater 0 1 NO None Federal; State I BRAC
I
Potential palttNay under residertial

Navy! While Oak Surface 09Gr0undwater2 Research. Development. Test and
Groundwater 1 1 30.9 EPA 314 reuse scenario if residents access IFederal; Stale I BRAC

I09Groundwater2IResearch, Development. Test and
05 Evaluation
I
Groundwater
I I I 4 4 24.0-180.0
I
EPA 314 lreuse scenario if residents access IFederal; Stale
I BRAC

I09Groundwater2IResearch. Development. Test and
06 Evaluation
I
Groundwater
I
2
I
2
I
11.0-25.0
I
EPA 314 lreuse scenario if residents access !Federal; State
grOUndwater for potable use.
I BRAC

1000roundwater2IResearch. Development. Test and
07 Evaluation
I
Groundwater
I 2 , 2
I
160.0
I
EPA 314 Ireuse scenario if residents access IFederal; Stale
groundwater fer potable use.
I BRAC

109Groundwater2IResearch. Development. Test and
08 Evaluation
I
Groundwater
I I 4 4
I 10.0·200.0
I
EPA 314 Ireuse scenario if residents access IFederal; Stale
grOUndwater lor potable use.
I BRAC
I I I
109GrOUndwater2lResearch. Development. Test and
09 Evaluation
Groundwater
I I 2 4
I NO' -180.0 EPA 314 reuse scenario if residents access IFederal; State
I BRAC

I09Groundwater2\Research. Development. Test and
11 Evaluation
I
Groundwater
, 1
I 1
I 12.0
I I
EPA 314 reuse scenario if residents access IFederal; State
I BRAC
Navy! ,While Oak Surface

!09GrOundwater2IResearch. Development. Test and
12 Evaluation
I
Groundwater
I I 4 4
I 2.2' - 5.5
I EPA 314
'<MRL
Ireuse scenario if residents access IFederal; Stale
I BRAC
I 09Gro~ridwater21 Research. Development. Test and

I I
Groundwater
I I I 8 8 180.0 - 880.0
I EPA 314 reuse scenario if residents access IFederal; State
I BRAC
Navy! \While Oak Surface

I09Groundwater2\Research. Development. Test and
14 Evaluation
I
Groundwater
I
3
I 4
I NO' - 330.0
\ EPA 314
\reuse scenario if residents access (Federal; State
I BRAC
I I I
/09GrOUndwater3/Research. Development. Test and
00 Evaluation
Groundwater
I I 1 1
I 210.0 EPA 314 reuse scenario if residents access IFederal; State
I BRAC
F~e: Percoata_AlISvcs_May6_
Sheet: Env Restoratioo-Cleanup. Other

, Method 314 reporting limit is 4 ppb Page 45 of 75
Regulatory

Equipment, Actlvltiesl I
Location
Detected
(Media)
I I I I I
Num~rof Number of Range of
~al:.aI
et
Interest (Cleanup
,reque~ed.
Potential Pathway(s) of Exposu· permitting
requirements,
J Funding Type.
sampling
requirements)
Navy! I
While Oak Surface

109Groundwater3IReseareh. Development. Test am
01 Evaluation
I Groundwater
I I I 1 1 190.0
I
(otential pathway under residential
EPA 314 reuse scenario if residents access Federal; State I BRAC
Navy I /While Oak Surface

I 09Groundwater51Research. Dellelopment. Test am
10 Evaluation
I Groundwater
I I I 3 3 21.0 - 39.1
I E300.0
Potential pathway umer residential
lreuse scenario if residents ecc8SS IFederal; State I BRAC
Potential pathway urder residential

Navy! \While Oak Surface
I09Groundwater5IResearch. Development. Test am
1S Evaluation' IGroundwater
I I 2 3
\, NO -11.6
I E3000 Ireuse scenario if residents access (Federal; State
( BRAC
Potential pathway urder residential

Navy! IWhile Oak Surface l~roundwater5 Research. Development. Test am Groundwater 2 3 NO -16.0 E300.0 reuse scenario if residents access IFederal; State I BRAC
Marine Corps Warfare center Evaluation
Navy! While Oak Surface 09Groundwater5 Research. DeVelopment, Test and

Marine Corps Warfare center 9 Evaluation
Groundwater 0 3 NO E3oo.0 None IFederal; State I BRAC

Navy! White Oak Surface 09Groundwater1 Research. Development, Test am
Groundwater 3 3 1.0 - 14.9 E3oo.0 reuse scenario if residents access IFederal; Stale I BRAC
Navy! While Oak Surface 09Groundwater1 Research. Development. Test am

Groundwater 0 3 NO E3oo.0 None IFederal; Stale I BRAC
Navy! Whne Oak Surface 09Groundwater6 Research, Development. Test am

IGroundwater ( 0 I 3 I NO I E3oo.0 INone IFederal; State I BRAC
Navy! White Oak Surface 09GroundwaterB Research, Development, Test am

Marine Corps Warfare Center L0361 Evaluation
IGroundwater I 0 I 3 I NO I E300.0 I None IFederal; State I BRAC
Navy! While Oak Surface Research. oevelopment. Test am

09PZ44
Evaluation
Navy! While Oak Surface Research. Development, Test am

09PZ55
Evaluation

Navy! Whne Oak Surface Research, Development. Test am
09PZ56 Groundwater 1 1 10.0 E300.0 reuse scenario if residents access I Federal; State I BRAC
Soff contamination could leach to

grOUndwater. Potential pathway
Navy! IWhife Oak Surface
1095B3OO
IResearch. Development. Test am
Evaluation Isoil
I 2
I
2
1
11.0 -1,400.0
I EPA 314 IUnder residential reuse scenario if IFederal; Slate
residents access groundwater for
I BRAC
potable use.
I / I I ( I I I
Fae: PercData_A1ISvcs_May6_
Sheet: Env Restoration-Cleanup, Other • Method 314 reporting limn is 4 ppb Page 46 of 75
Regulatory

Location
Detected
(Media)
~~:~aI
Interest (Cleanup
Potential Pathway(s) of Exposure ~itling

requested,
requ..ements,
I Funding Type
sampling
requirements)
Soil contamination may leach to

I
Navy I IWhile Oak Surface
I095B301
I Research, DeVelopment, Test and
Evaluation Iso~ I
2
I
2
I 15.0- 40.0
I EPA314
grOUllf/Waler. Potential pathway
IUnder
residential reuse scenario if (Federal; State I BRAC
residents access groundwater for
potable use.
Navy I While Oak Surlace Research, DeVelopment, Test and

Marine Corps Warlare center
09SP201
Evaluation
Groundwaler 0 1 ND E300.0 None (Federal; State I BRAC

Navy I White Oak Surface Research, Dev6lopment, Test and
09SP202
Evaluation
Groundwater 1 1 12.6 E300.0 reuse scenario if residents access IFederal; Stale I BRAC
groundwater for potabfe use.
Navy I While Oak Surface 09SUrface Research, Development, Test and

Marine Corps Warlare Center Water100 Evaluation
Surface Waler 0 1 ND E300.0 None IFederal; State I BRAG
Navy I While Oak Surface 09Surface Research, Development, Test and

Marine Corps Warfare Center Water200 Evaluation
ISurface Water I 0 I 1 I ND I E300.0 I None IFederal; Stale I BRAC

Marine Corps Warlare Center Waler201 Evaluation
(Surface Water I 0 I 1 I ND I E300.0 INone IFederal; State I BRAC

Marine Corps Warfare center Water202 Evaluation
ISurlace Waler I 0 ( 1 ( ND I E300.0 INone IFederal; Stale I BRAC
Navy I While Oak Surface 09Surlace Research, Development, Test and

Marine Corps Warfare center Water203 Evaluation
ISurface Water I 0 ( 1 I NO ( E300.0 INone IFederal; State I BRAC
Navy I While Oak Surface

IMarine Corps Warfare Certer
09Surface
Water204
Evaluation
(Surface Water ( 0 , 1 I ND ( E300.0 INone IFederal; State I BRAG
Navy I White Oak Surface Research, Development, Test and

09TP303 ISoU ( 0 ( 1 I NO I EPA 314 INone IFederal; Stale I BRAG
Marine Corps Warfare center Evaluation

09TP~
Evaluation
ISo~ I 0 I 2 I NO ,
EPA 314 (None 'Federal; State I BRAG

09TP319A
Evaluation
ISo~ ( 0
, 1 J ND ,
EPA 314 (None IFederal; State I BRAG

09TP319B
Evaluation
ISo~ I 0 I 1 I ND ,
EPA 314 INone IFederal; Slate , BRAG

09TP316
Evalualion
ISoil I 0 I 1 ( ND I EPA 314 INone (Federal; State I BRAG
Navy I While Oak Surlace 11Groundwater1 Research, Development, Test and

Marine Corps Warfare Center 01 Evalualion
IGroundwater I 0 I 3 I ND ( E300.0 INone (Federal; State I BRAG

• Method 314 reporting limit Is 4 ppb Page¢70f75
Regulatory

Location
Detected
(Media)
1 I I
Number of Number
Range
mi' I 1 Interest (Oeanup
requested,
A;alvt;:1 Potential Pathway(s) of Exposur permitting
8th requirements,
I Funding Type
sampling
requirements)
I
I~avy! While Oak Surface

llGroundwaterl Research, Development, Test and
02 Evaluation
Groundwater 0 3 NO E300.0 None Federal; Stale I BRAC
!

Navy! While Oak Surface 11Groundwaterl Research, Development, Test and
Groundwater 2 3 NO -8.5 E300.0 reuse scenario if residents access IFederal; Stale I BRAC
Navy! While Oak Surface llGroundwaterl Research, Development, Test and

Groundwater 0 4 NO E300.0 None IFederal; Stale I BRAC

Navy! While Oak Suface 11Groundwaterl Research, Development, Test and
Groundwater 1 4 NO -6.3 E300.0 reuse scenario if residents access IFederal; State I BRAC
Navy! While Oak Surface llGroundwaterl Research, Development, Test and

Marine Corps Warfare Center 06 EvaluatIOn
Navy! While Oak SUrface llGroundwaterl Research, Development, Test and

MarineCorps Warfare Center 07 Evaluation

Navy! While Oak Surface 11Groundwaterl Research, Development, Test and
Groundwater 3 3 31.0 -44.0 E300.0 reuse scenario if residents access IFederal; State I BRAC
Navy! While Oak Surface I 1Groundwaterl Research, Development, Test and


Navy! Whtte Oak Surface 11 Groundwaterl Research, Development, Test and
Groundwater 3 3 38.0 -46.9 E300.0 reuse scenario if residents access IFederal; State I BRAC

I
111Groundwaterl Research, Development, Test and
Evaluation
I
Groundwater
I 1
I I 4 NO - 58.5
I
E300.0 jreuse scenario if residents access ]Federal; Stale I BRAC
-
111GrOUndwater2! Research, Development, Test and
2 EvalUlltion
I
Groundwater
I 2
I I 4 ND-7.0
I E3000 IPotential pathway under residential
reuse scenario if residents access IFederal; Slate
I BRAC
Navy! !While Oak Surface

I
I llGroundwater2 Research, Development, Test and
Evaluation
I
Groundwater
I 3
I I 3 84.7 - 190.0
I
E300.0 Ireuse scenario if residents access IFederal; Slate I BRAC
I IPotential pathway under residential

Navy! /While Oak Surface
111Groundwaler21Research, Development, Test and
4 Evaluation Groundwater
I I I 2 3 NO -110.0
I E300.0 reuse scenario if residents access IFederal; Slate
I BRAC
File: PercData_AlISvcs_May6_
Sheet: Env Restoration-Cleanup, Other • Method 314 reporting Iimtt is 4 ppb Page 48 0175
Regulatory

location
Detected
(Media)
I I I I I
Number of Number
Range of
A~al=I
et
Interest (Cleanup
Potential Pathway!s) of Exposur1requested,

jlermitting
reqUirements,
I FundIng Type
sampling
requirements)
Navy! IWhite Oak SUrface I ~1Groondwater2 Research, Development, Test and Groundwater 1 3 ND-7.0 E300.0 reuse ~io if residents access
Federal; State I . BRAG

grounciwater for potable use.
Navy! While Oak Surface 11Groundwater2 Research, Development, Test and

Groundwater 0 4 NO E300.0 None IFederal; Slale I BRAG
Navy! White Oak Surface 11Groundwater2 Research, Development, Test and

Groundwater 2 3 ND-9.0 E300.0 reuse scenario if residents access IFederal; State I BRAC

Groundwater 0 3 NO E300.0 None IFederal; State I BRAG
Navy! White Oak Surface 11Groundwater2 Research, Development. Test and

Navy! WMe Oak Surface 11Groundwatero Research, Development, Test and

Groundwater 2 3 NO -14.0 E300.0 reuse scenario if residents access IFederal; State I BRAG

Potentiat pathway under residential
Navy! /While Oak Surface I;1Groundwater6 Research, Development, Test and Groundwater 1 3 ND-5.0 E300.0 reuse scenario if residents access tFederal; State I BRAG


Evaluation





IGroundwater I 0 I 3 I NO I E300.0 INane IFederal; State I BRAG

IGroondwater I 0 I 4 I NO I E300.0 INane I Federal; State I BRAC

File: PereData_AIISvcs_Mayfl_

* Method 314 repo1ing limit is 4 ppb Page 490175
Regulatory
Service I Facility I Site J

Location
Detected
(Media)
~:~~c:I
A I
Interest (Cleanup
Potential Pathway(sl of Exposure per~iIting

requested.
requtrements.
I Funding Type
sampling
requirements)

11GroundwatlK8 Research. Development, Test and
6 Evaluation
I I I I I I
Groundwater 0 3 ND E300.0 None IFederal; State I
BRAC·
Navy! Wh~e Oak Surface 11Groundwater8 Research, Development. Test and

IGroundwater I 0 I 4 I ND I E300.0 INone IFederal; State I
BRAG
Navy! White Oak Surface 11GroundwatlK8 Research. Development. Test and \I

IGroundwater I 0 4 I ND I E300.0 INone IFederal; State I
BRAC
Navy! White Oak Surface Rese~ch.Dev~opment.Testand

11PZ62
Evaluation
IGroundwater I 0 I 4 I. ND I E300.0 INone IFederal; State I
BRAC
Navy! White Oak Surface Res~ch. Development. Test and

11PZ63
Evaluation
BRAG

Navy! White Oak Sl.a1ace Rese~h. Development. Test and
11PZ64 Groundwater 1 3 ND-8.0 E300.0 reuse scenario if residents access IFederal; State 1
BRAG
Marine Corps WMare Center Evaluation

11PZ65
Evaluation
BRAC
Navy! Wh~e Oak Surface Research. Development. Test and

46EW-1
Evaluation
IGroundwater I 0 I 3 I NO I EPA 314 INone IFederal; Slate I BRAG

Marine Corps Warfare Gerter
46EW-2
Evaluation
Groundwater 0 3 ND EPA 314 None IFederal; State I BRAG

46EW-3
Evaluation
Groundwater 3 3 4.6 -7.2 EPA 314 reuse scenario if residents access IFederal; State I BRAC
Navyl White Oak Surface Research. Development, Test and

46EW-4
Evaluation

~ineCorps Warfare Center
46EW:5'
Evaluation

46EW--6 Groundwater 3 3 7.4 - 8.6 EPA 314 reuse scenario if residents access IFederal; State I BRAG
groundwater for potable USB.
Navy I White Oak Surface 46Groundwaler1 Research. Development. Test and

Groundwater 0 2 ND E300.0 None IFederal; State I BRAG
Navy I White Oak Surface 46Groundwater1 Research. Development. Test and

IGroundwater I 0 I 3 I ND I E300.0 INone IFederal; State I BRAG
Sheet: Env Restoration-Cleanup. Other • Method 314 reporting lim~ is 4 ppb Page 50 of 75
Regulatory
Service I Facility J Site J

Source of Perchlorate (Opel1ltions.
location
Detected
(Medial
I I I
Numb~r of Number
Range
DetectIOns Collected Detected (ppb)
MI'
8th
I
A;alytl~aI Potential Pathway(s) of Exposurerequested.
Interest (Cleanup
permitting
requirements.
I Funding Type
sampling
requirements)
Navy! IWhfte Oak Surface

146GroundwalerllResearch. Development. Test and
23 Evaluation
I
Groundwater
I I I 3 8 ND' - 9.3 I Potential pathway under residential
E300.0; EPAlreuse scenario if residents access Federal; State
314 groundwater for potable use.
I BRAC

Navy ! IWhfte Oak Suface 46Groundwaterl Research, Development, Test and E300.0;EPA
Groundwater 3 5 NO'-14.1
314
reuse scenario if residents access !Federal; State I BRAC
\ groundwater for potable use.
Navy! White Oak Surface 46Groundwaterl Research, Development. Test and

Groundwater 0 2 ND E300.0 None IFederal; Slate I BRAC

Navy! Whfte Oak Surface 46Groundwaterl Research, Development. Test and
MarineCorps Warfare center 25 Evaluation
Groundwater 2 2 12.4 - 15.4 E300.0 reuse scenario if residents access IFederal; Slate I BRAC

Navy! IWhfte Oak Surface 46Groundwater1 Research, Development, Test and
Groundwater 2 2 65.2 - 67.5 E300.0 reuse scenario if residents access IFederal; State I BRAC
Marine CorPS Warfare center 250 Evaluation
Navy' White Oak Surface 46Groundwater1 Research, Development, Test and

Groundwater 0 2 ND E300.0 None )Federal; Stale I BRAC

Navy! White Oak Surface 46Groundwaterl Research, Development, Test and
Groundwater 1 2 ND 11.1 E300.0 reuse scenario if residents access JFederal; State I BRAC
Navy! White Oak Surface 46Groundwaler1 Research, Development. Test and

Groundwater 0 2 ND E300.0 None IFederal; State I BRAC

Navy! Whfte Oak Surface 46Groundwater1 Research, Development. Test and E300.0; EPA
Groundwater g 16 ND' -12.0 reuse scenario if residents access IFederal; State I BRAC
MarineCorps Warfare center 30 Evaluation 314
-
Navy' I While Oak Surface 46Groundwaterl Research, Development. Test and E300.0; EPA
Groundwater 3 15 ND' -5.1
314
Navy! White Oak Surface 46Groundwaterl Research, Development, Test and

Groundwater 0 1 ND E300.0 None IFederal; State I BRAC

Navy! Whfte Oak Surface 46Groundwaterl Research. Development, Test and E300.0; EPA
Groundwater 5 15 ND' - 15.0
314
Navy' fVhile Oak Surface

1~6GrOUndwater1 l~esearch' DeveloPment. Test and
34 Evaluation I I I I
Groundwater 10 16 NO'.-14.0 I 314
E300.0; EPA reuse scenario if residents access IFederal; State
I BRAC
File; PercData_AllSvcs_May6_
S'-': Env Restoration-Cleanup, Other , Method 314 reporting limit is 4 ppb Page 51 of75
I I I I I ,
Regulatory
Service I Facility , , Site

Equipment. AetMties) I
Location
Detected
(Media)
Detecbons Collected Detected (ppb)
~alytlcal
ethod
Interest (Oeanup
requested,
Potential Pathway(s) of Exposur permitting
requirements,
I Funding Type
sampling
requirements)
Navy/ WhRe Oak Surface

I
46GroundWater1 Research, Development, Test and
Evaluation
I
Groundwater
I 0
I 12
I NO I E300.0; EPAt
314 one IFederal; State I BRAC
Navy/ While Oak Surface 46Groundwater2 Research, Development, Test and

IGroundwater I 0 I 2 I NO I E300.0 INone IFederal; Stale I BRAC
Navy/ WhRe Oak Surface 46Groundwater2 Research, Development, Test and

IGroundwater I 0
\
I 2 I NO I E300.0 INone IFederal; State I BRAC
Marine Corps Warfare Center OOS Evalualion
Navy/ While Oak Surface 46Groundwater2 Research, Devplopment, Test and

Marine Corps Warfare Center 010 . Evaluation
IGroundwater I 0 I 2 I' NO I E300.0 INone IFederal; Stale I BRAC
Navy/ WhRe Oak Surface 46Groundwater2 Research, Development, Test and

MarineCorps Warfare Center 01S Evaluation
Navy/ White Oak Suface 46Groundwater2 Research, Development, Test and

Navy/ White Oak Surla<;e 46Groundwater2 Research, Development, Test and

02S Evaluation
Potantlal pathway under residential

Navy/ White Oak Surface 46Groundwater2 Research, Development, Test and
Evaluation
Groundwater 1 2 ND-9.3 E300.0 reuse scenario if residents access IFederal; State I BRAC

Navy/ WhRe Oak Sutface 46Groundwater2 Research, Development, Test and

Evaluation

Navy/ White Oak Sutface 46Groundwater2 Research, Development, Test and
Groundwater 1 3 NO - 7.6 E3llO.0 reuse scenario if residents access lFederal; State I BRAC
Navy / I
W hile Oak Surface
46Gro~Odwater2 Research, Development, Test and
07 Evaluation
Groundwater 2 2 9.9 - 10.1 E300.0
reuse scenario if residents access IFederal; State I BRAG

Marine Corps Warfere Certer 08 Evaluation

Navy/ White Oak Surface 46Groundwater2 Research, Development. Test and
Groundwater 2 2 9.8 -10.8 E300.0 reuse scenario if residents access IFederal; State I BRAG
Navy / sl~hite
Oak Surface j46GrOUndwater2IReSearch, Developmert, Test and
Groundwater 0 2 NO E300.0 None IFederal; Stale I BRAG
Marine Corps Warfare Center 13D Evaluation
Sheet: Env Restoration-Oeanup, Other • Method 314 reporting limit is 4 ppb Page 52 of 75
Regulatory

Location
Detected
(Media)
I I I
Detections Collected Detected (ppbl
I
Number of Samples Concentrations MetboC: Potential Pathway(s) of Exposure per~itting
Number of Range of \. Anatytl I requested,
reqwrements,
Interest (Cleanup
I Funding Type
sampling
requirements)
Navy! While Oak Surface 46Groundwater2 Research, Development, rest and

MarineCorps Wariare cerner 13M Evaluation
Groundwater 0 2 NO E300.0 None Federal; State I BRAC
Potential pethway under residential

\

IGroundwater I 0 I 2 I NO t E300.0 INone IFederal; State I BRAC

IGroundwater I 0 I 2 I NO I E3OO.0 INone IFederal; State I BRAC


Navy! While Oak Surface 46Groundwater2 Research. Development, Test and
Groundwater 1 2 NO - 15.1 E300.0 reuse scenario if residents access IFederal; State I BRAC
Marine Corps Warfare cerner 17 Evaluation
Navy I White Oak Surface 46Groundwater2 Research, Development, Test and


Groundwater 2 2 25.4 - 35.4 E300.0 reuse scenario if residents access IFederal; Slate I BRAC
Navy! White Oak Surface 46Groundwater2 Research. Development, Test and

20
Navy! While Oak Surface Research. Development, Test and

46SP206
Evaluation
Navy! While Oak Surface 46Surface Research, Development. Test and

I Surface Water I 0 I 1 I NO I E300.0 INone IFederal; State I BRAC
Navy! White Oak Surface 46Surface Research, Development, Test and

ISurface Water I 1 I 2 I NO -7:2 I E300.0 INo potential pathways known IFederal; State I BRAC
Navy I White Oak Surface 46Surface Research, Development, Test and

MarineCorps Warfare Center Waler202 Evaluation
ISurface Water I 0 I 1 I NO I E300.0 INone IFederal; State I BRAC
Navy I While Oak Surface 46Surface Research, Development. Test and

Marine Corps Warlare Centet Waler203 Evaluation
ISurlace Water I 1 I 1 I 7.6 I E300.0 I No potential pathways known IFederal; State I BRAC
Fie: PercData_AlISvcs_May6_
Sheet: Env Restoratior>-Oeanup, Other • Method 314 reporting limit is 4 ppb Page 53 of 75
Regulatory

Location
Detected
(Media)
I ofI I I I
N bar
D~'Ons
Number of Range of
A Iyti I
:t~
Interest (Cleanup
requested,
Potential Pathway(s) of Exposure ~ilting
requirements,
I Funding Type
sampling
requirements)

NO None Federal; State I BRA~
Navy I White Oak Surface 46Surface IResearch, Development, Test and

ISurface Water I 1 I 1 I 8.5 I E3OO.0 I No potential pathways krown IFederal; state I BRAC
Navy I White Oak Surface 46Surface Research. Development. Test and

!Surface Water I 1 I 1 I 7.3 I E300.0 I No potential pathways krown IFederal; Slate I BRAC
Army Perchlorate Survey. Environmental Restoration· Cleanup, otheF
Building 528
Future perml
Ammunition
EPA 314 requirements for I
Army lFort Wingate Depot Activityl Nonmal Munition DemD so~ 29 31 NO· 3.18 ppm So~ Ingestion BRAC
modified sampling and
Maintenance
cleanup
B~ding
. Future permff
Former TNT

Army IFort Wingate Depot AclivitylWashout
Munition Dema soff 1 11 NO· 0.10 ppm So~ Ingestion BRAC
FacHffies
cleanup
Future permft
FOI'merTNT
requirements for I
Army I Fort Wingate Depot AclivftylWashout
Munition Demn Groundwater 12 47 NO' -76.6ppb EPA 314.0 Water Ingestion
sampling and
BRAC
Facilfties
cleanup
Former TNT Future perml
requirements for I
Army IFort Wingate Depot Activityl~~~=and Munition Demn Groundwater 2 2 2,440 - 2,890 EPA 314.0 Water Ingestion
sampling and
BRAC
Building 528 cleanup

Former TNT
Future permff
Washout
requirements for I
Army IFort Wingate Depot AclivilylFacilfties and Munftion Demil Groundwater 2 17 NO' - 9.4 ppb EPA 314.0 Water Ingestion BRAC
sampling and
Buffdings 542 I
cleanup
600
Former TNT
Future permft
Washout
requirements fOl' I
Army I Fort Wingate Depot ActivitylFaclffies and Munftion Demil Groundwater 0 16 NO' - 10.0 ppb 314 Water Ingestion
sampling and
BRAC
Adminstration
cleanup
Area
Former TNT
Washout Future permff
requirements for I
Army IFort Wingate Depot Activityl~:=and Munffion Demn Groundwater 0 8 NO 314 rona
sampling and
BRAC
Property cleanup
Boundary
Future permft
Sewage
requirements for I
Army JFort Wingate Depot ActivitylTreatment Munition Oemil Groundwater 0 2 NO 314 none
sampling and
BRAC
'IFacility .
cleanup
Fae: PercDatafliSvcs_MayG_
Sheet: Env Restoration-CIeanup, Other

' Method 314 reporting Iimil is 4 ppb Page 54 of 75
Regulatory

Equipment. Aetlv!ti811) I
Location
Oetected
(Media)
I I I I I
Detections Sampl811 Concentrations
• Collected Detected (ppb)
Analytical
Interest {Cleanup
reqW:S!ed,
Method Potential Pathway(s) of Exposure ~Iltlng
reqUIrements.
I Funding Type
sampling
requirements)
Army IFort Wi"9"te Depot Activ~I~:~ Area IMunition Dem~ I Groundwater

I I I 1 14 NO" - 10.0 ppb I 314 \water,lngestion
I Future perm~
requirements lor I
sampling and
BRAC
cleanup
Future perm~
lFort W"'llate Depot Activ~IOB/O~ Area- requirements lor I
Army
curre
MumiOn Demil Groundwater 14
. 39 NO" - 15.0 ppb 314 Water Ingestion
sampling and
cleanup
BRAC
SVAD-009-R-Dl
314.011.0
Army ISavanna Army Depot IOId Burning Open bum'ope(l detonation Groundwater 1 11 4.7 ppb
uglL
Drinking Water I BRAC
Grounds
---
SVAD-D50
314.011.0
Army ISavanna Army Depot !Aclive Open burnfopen detonation Groundwater 7 9 1.2 - 12.0"
uglL
Drinking Water I BRAC
Oemol~ion Area
Sunflower Army Surface RCRA Corrective I

Army
IAmm~n Plant (SFAAP) WaterMU21 None Groundwater 0 1 NO E314.0/4ppb None
Action Permft
BRAC
Sunflower Army Surface

NO RCRA Corrective I
Army None Groundwater 0 1 E314.0/4ppb None BRAC
'Ammunftion Plant (SFAAP) WalerMU21 Action Permft

Army None Groundwater 0 1 NO E314.0I4ppb None BRAC
I Ammunftion Plant (SFAAP) WaterMU27 Action Permft

Army None Groundwater 0 1 NO E314.0/4ppb None BRAC
IAmmunlliOn Plant (SFAAP) WaterMU 27 Action Perm~

'Ammunition Plant (SFAAP) WaterMU27 Action Permft

IAmmunftion Plant (SFAAP) WalerMU 39 Action Permft
Army
ISunflower Army Surface
None Groundwater 0 1 NO E314.0I4ppb None
RCRA Corrective I
BRAC
Ammumion Plant (SFAAP) WaterMW39 Action Permft

IAmmunllion Plant (SFAAP) WaterMU 39 Action Permft

IAmmunllion Plant (SFAAP) WaterMU 39 Action Permft

\AmmUnllion Plant (SFAAP) WaterMU39 Action Perm~
ISUnflower Army Surface RCRA Corrective I

Army None GrOUndwater 0 1 NO E314.0/4ppb None BRAC
'Ammunition Plant (SFAAP) WaterMU 39 Action Permft
File: PercDala_AllSvcs_May6_
Sheet: Env Restoration-Cleanup. Other "Method 314 reporting Iim~ is 4 ppb Page 55 0175
Regulatory
Service I Facility I SlIe I

Source of Perchlorate (Operalion5,
Equipment, ActMtles) I
Locallon
Detected
(Media)
I I I I I
N be of Number of Range of
0:::II:n5 Samples Concentrations
A Iytl I
~:Ih:
Inlere51 (Cleanup
,requested'
Potential Pathway(s) of Exposur per~ilting
requ..ements,
I Funding Type .
sampling
requirements)
Army
,Sunflower Army Surface
None Groundwater 0 1 NO E314.0/4ppb None
RCRA Corrective I
BRAC'
lAmmunition Plant (SFAAP) WaterMU39 ActionPerm~
f
[Sunflower Army Surface RCRA Corrective I

I Ammun~ion Plant (SFAAP) WaterMU39
Army None Groundwater 0 3 NO E314.0I4ppb None BRAC
Action Permit
Sunflower Army Surface \ RCRA Corrective I

Army None Surface Water 0 3 NO E314.0/4ppb None BRAC
IAmmunitlon Plant (SFAAP) WaterMU 39 Action Perm~
,Sunflower Army Surface RCRA Corrective

Ammunition Plant (SFAAP) WaterMU 47 Action Permit I
Sunflower Army Surface

E314.0I4ppb None RCRA Corrective I
Army None Groundwater 0 1 NO BRAC
IAmmunition Plant (SFAAP) WaterMU66 Action Perm~
,Sunflower Army Surface RCRA Corrective

Action Perm~ I
IAmmunition Plant (SFAAP) WaterMU66
jsunllower Army Surface RCRA Corrective I

Ammunition Plant (SFAAP) WaterMU66 Action Perm~
,Sunllower Army Surface RCRA Corrective

Action Perm~ I
Ammun~lon Plant (SFAAP) WaterMU66
,Sunflower Army Surface RCRA Corrective I

Ammun~ion Plant (SFAAP) WaterMU66 Action Perm~

'AmmUnition Plant (SFAAP) WaterMU66 Action Perrn~
,Sunllower Army Surface RCRA Corrective I

Army None Sediment 0 5 NO E314.0/4ppb None BRAC
,Sunflower Army Surface RCRA Corrective I

Army None Surface Water 0 4 NO E314.0/4ppb None BRAC
Army IUmatilla Chemical Depot

Ammuniton
(ADA)
I'
Demol~ion Area OB/OO
,
I, I
I
I
I,
Groundwater 5 45 5-9.6 ppb EPAp~:415.0 No Completed Pathway IUnknown I BRAC
I I I The Sewage ouIIall is ullimately

flowing to the Wright Patman Lake
nearby, which is one of two sources
Army 'Red River Army Depot jX-1 Sewer Plant ,sanitary sewer treated from RRAO and
Lone Star AAP I Groundwater
I 1
I 31
I 6.8 ppb
I EPA 314.0 lothef drinking water for Texarkana and I'
r at'
surrounding communities. In rnv:~: blO~tate I BRAC
March, 2003, the State and eq y
installation sampled the lake area,
I I I I , / J I
and ~s sediments and found no
detection.
I
FRe: PercOata_AlISvcs_May6_
Sheet: Env Restoration-Cleanup, other • Melhod 314 reporting linit is 4 ppb Page 56 0175
Regulatory

Location
Detected
(Media)
I I I I I
Numb~r of
Delectoons
Number
Range of
Collected Detected (ppb) Method
Interest (Cleaoop
AnalytIcal Potential Pathway(s) of Exposurerequesred.

permitting
requirements.
I Funding Type
sampling
requirements)
Army IRed River Army Depot JX-I 5awer Plant ISanllary s_ treated from RRAD and SUrface Water 0 5 NO EPA 314.0 none Investigation I
BRAC
loneStarMP required by State
I
Army IRed River Army Depot

I sanllary sewer treated from RRAO and
Sediment none InvestilJalion I
('1 5awer Plant lone Star MP 0 5 NO EPA 314.0
required by State
BRAC
lEast Bum NO.2.

Army IPueblo Chemical Oepot Used for destroying obsolete, unserviceable Groundwater
\
1 RCRA Corrective I
ISUrface 0 NO EPA 314.0 none BRAC
or excess conventional munitions.
Action
WaterMU5
This area was used for incineralion of
Complete pathway from ex~ to
Army I Pueblo Chemical Depot

North Burn Area munitions, chemical and hazardous wastes.
I No.1. Surface Propellants were placed in large pans and Groundwater

1 2 NO' - 9.3 ug/l
E314.0. Rl= Chico Creek aquifer and into the
2.5 ugll Arkansas alluvial aquifer where
I
RCRA Corrective I
Action
BRAC
WalerMU6 ignited. Pershing missile rocket motor
residences utilize groundwater.

static firings were conducted here.
This area was used for incineration of
Army IPueblo Chemical Depot

North Bum Area ImUnitions, chemical and hazardous wastes.,
INo. 2, Surface Propellants were placed in large pans and Groundwater
I I I 012 NO I
E314.0, Rl =Inone
2.5 ugll
IRCRA Corrective I
Action
BRAC
WaterMU 7 ignited. Pershing missile rocket motor
static firings were conducted here.
I
TNTWashou!
E314.0, Rl Complete pathway from exit to
Facll~and Ammunition workshoP area. Energetics
varies Chico Creek aquifer and into the IRCRA Corrective I
Army IPuebio Chemical Depot jOischarge were reclaimed from munitions. Pink water Groundwater 1 21 NO' - 180 ugll BRAC
between 4.0 Arkansas alluvial aquWer where Action
System. Surface discharged to unlined lagoon.
and 8.0 ug/l. residences utilize groundwater.
WaterMU 17
E314.0, Rl
Army IPueblo Chemical Oepot
East Lagoon.
jSurface
Served as the waste lagoon for collection of
all industrial area wastes to include the Groundwater

0 3 NO varies none
between 100
I I
RCRA Corrective I
Action
BRAC
WaterMU 21 Missile F acil~ Building.
and 200 ug/l
IPits South of the

Army IPueblo Chemical Depot
Guided Missile Demolition area potentially used for
I WorkShop,
Surface
destroying bombs by detonating them in
pits.
IGroundwater
I I I 0 1 NO I
E314.0. Rl =1
4.0 ug/l none
I
RCRA Corrective I
Action
BRAC
WaterMU 42
700 Series
Army IPuebio Chemical Oepot I

Buldings,
Surface
IAmmUnition renovation and maintenance
buildings.
IGroundwater
I 0
I 1
I NO I
E314.0. Rl =1
20 ugll none
I
RCRA Corrective I
Action
BRAC
WaterMUs 53.
55 and 57
Concentrated
Army
N~Acid
Red Fuming
IPueblo Chemical Depot IDisposal Area, I
Uncertain IGroundwater
I I I 0 1 NO I =1
E314.0, Rl none
20 ugll
IRCRA Corrective I
Action
BRAC
Surface
, WaterMU20
File: PercOata_AIISvcs_May6_
Sheet: Env Restoratio~learup. Other • Method 314 repor1ing limit is 4 ppb Page 57 of 75
Regulatory

Source of Perchlonlte (Operations.
Location
Detected
(Media)
I I I I I.
Detections Samples Concentnltlons
Analytical
Interest (Cleanup
requested,
requorements.
I Funding Type.
sampling
requirements)
Sampling
Jefferson Proving Ground rperatlonal I I k~

conducted by the
Army 1(0peratI0nal Range

sampl' )
'"9
Ranges - Impact Operations
and boundary
areas I I I SL 36 160 1.0270.11 mglkg EPA 314 INO pattAvays
Environmental J
INffiY
Center as part of
the Range
Assessment
Program
ER.A(BRAC)
sampling
conducted by the
'I
ISurla~ I I I
Jefferson Proving Ground loperatlonai
:~":~;:c' Operations Environmental
INffiY
Army I(Operational Range
sampling) areas
Wmer 1 22
I' 0.87 ppb' EPA 3141NO known pattAvays
Center as part 01 J
the Range
ER,A(BRAC)
Assessment
Program
Sampling
Jefferson Proving Ground rperational

I(~tional Range
I
:~~mpact Operations EPA 314
conducted by the
Environmental
I I I
INffiY
Army
s~p1mg) ~
sediment 0 22 NO
modified INc known pathways Center as part 01 I ER,A(BRAC)
areas I I the Range
Assessment
Program
Sampling
Jefferson Proving Ground rperational I conducted by the

y
Army )(0 atio I Ra
per, na nge
samplmg)
Ranges - Impact 0 r
and boundary
areas
pera IOns
I I I I I
Groundwater 0 14 NO
EPA 314
modified INO known pathways
Environmental I
IArm
Center as part of
the Range
Assessment
ER.A(BRAC)
Program
Sampling
conducted by the
Operational
Nffiy
Ft Polk (Operational RangelRang~ c Impact
EPA314 Environmental I
Operations SL 0 97 NO No known pathways OMA
sampling) and boundary
modified Center as part of
areas
the Range
Assessment
Army I Program
'0"'.......
IFt Polk (Operational Range Ranges - Impact EPA 314 conducted by the I
Operations Surlace Water 0 17 NO No known pathways OMA
lsampling) andbound~ modifoed Army
Armv
I Ft Polk (Operational Range Ranges - Impact
lsampling) and boundary
Operations Sediment 0 17 NO
EPA 314
modifoed INO known pathways
Iconducted by the I
Army
OMA
Arm"
F~e: PercData_ARSvcs_May6_
Sheet: Env Restoration-Cleanup, Other • Method 314 reporting limn is 4 ppb Page 58 0175
Regulatory
Service t Facility I Site I

Location
Detected
(Media)
I I I I I
Analytical requested.
Detections Samples Concentrabons Method Potential Pathway(s) of Exposur permitting
Collected Detected (ppb) requirements.
1
Interest (Cleanup
I Funding Type
sampling
requirements)
Sampling
conducted by the
Operational Army
Ft Bliss (Operational Rang1Ranges -Impact
SL 259 NO
EPA 314
No known pathways Environmental I
Operations 0 OMA
sampling) and boundary modified center as part of
areas the Range
Assessment
IArmY I \ Program
Sampling
conducted by the
Operational Army
Ft Bliss (Operational Rang1Ranges - Impact
Operations Sediment 0 29 NO
EPA 314
No known pathways Environmental I OMA
sampling) and boundary modified center as part of
areas the Range
Assessment
Armv I I Program
Sampling
conducted by the
Operational Army
FI Bliss (Operational Rang;RangeS - Impact EPA 314 Environmertal I
Operations Groundwater 0 6 NO No known pathways OMA
sampling) and boundary modified Center as part of
areas the Range
Assessment
Armv I I Program
CPBQ-001-R-D1 Sampling and

Army ICamp BomevUle 'Oemo1/LF4
OB/OO Groundwater 6 24 5-214 uglL 314 modified Potential drinking water
Cleanup
I BRAC
---
Sampling
Army IFort Ord (BRAC)

IStte 39 - Multi-
Range Area
I Range Operations - use of perchlorate
containing munttions for training purposes.
I soil
I I
I 41 432 13-106 Ilg/kg I EPA 314/ZO-!N k thw
2060 Ilg/kg 0 nown pa ay
requirements
I(suspected
contaminant in
I BRAC
range areas due

to historical use).
Sampling
Army IFort Ord (BRAC) IStte

36A 39 - Range I. . I
ConductIng OB/OO operations. soil
I I I
0 10 I
No detections. EPA 314151-1
61 Ilglkg none
rBQUirements by
California EPA for I BRAC
RCRAclean
closure of site.
Army
ILonghorn Army 1-86000 ppb' Groundwater incomplete
RegUlatory
I BRAC
Ammunition Plant request
Area
Site 29 Former
,Longhorn Army 300.0 & Regulatory
Army
Ammunition Plant
TNT Production Operations SoU 13 56 24-2410 ppb
314.0/40
No known pathway
request
I BRAC
Area
Army I~onghorn Anriy

Ammunition Plant
Site 35 Sumps
(Various)
Operations Groundwater 54 190 1-82900 ppb'
300.0 &
314.0/4
Groundwater incomplete
Regulatory
request
I BRAC
Fie: PereOata_AlISvcs_MayS_
Sheet: Env RestoratiOn-Cleanup. Other • Method 314 reporting limit is 4 ppb Page 59 of 75
Regulatory

Location
Detected
(Media)
I j
N be f Number of
O:::::ctl~:S
I I I
Range of
Collected Oetected (ppbl
~::.:~c:
A I . I
Interest (Cleanup
requested,
requirements,
I Funding Type .
sampling
requirements)
Longhorn Army Is~e 35 Sumps Operations 300.0 & Regulatory

Army
IAmmumion Plant (Various)
Son 17 106 20-1450 ppb
314.0/40
No known pathway
request
I BRAC
S~e 50 Former
,LOnghorn Army 300.0 & Regulatory
Army
AmmumiOn Plan!
Iwaste Disposal Operations Groundwater 15 34 2-150000 ppb'
314.0/4
Groundwater incomplete
request
I BRAC
Facil~y
--
Army
Longhorn Army
'Ammunition Plant
Sile 50 Former
Waste Disposal Operations Son 6 14 15-45600 ppb 3~O~:O INO known pathway IRegulatory
request
I BRAC
Facility
,Longhorn Army 300.0& Regulatory

Army Perimeter Wells Operations Surface Water 0 6 NO none I BRAC
Ammunition Plant 314.0/4,40 reqLlElst
Sile35,
Army
ILonghorn Army Gooseberry Operations Surface Water 44 110 1-59 ppb 300.0/4 Surface Water to Caddo Lake
Regulatory
I BRAC
Ammumion Plant request
Creek
Longhorn Army SIll 18-24, 0 tions Regulatory

Army
IAmmumiOn Plant Harrision Bayou para
Surface Waler 22 105 6-905 ppb 300.0/4 Surface Water to Caddo Lake
request
I BRAC
Various firing
ranges and
impact areas.
Includes parcels:
Analyses
73Q-X, 870-X,
performed at the
91Q-X, 114Q-X, EPA Method
request of
1150, 116Q-X, 314.0; SoH
IFort McClellan, calhoun 11170.X, 1350· Possible contamination from weapons firing
MRL-40lo
regulatory
Army
County, Nabama X, 138Q-X, 1390
and impacts dUring historical training Surface Soil 2 182 10 & 32 ppb'
68ppband
possible ingestion agencies (EPA I BRAC
activ~ies. and ADEM)
X, 14OQ·X, 141 sediment 90
during s~e
X,1420-X, ppb
investigation
1510, 181(7),
phase.
194(7), 2000,
2010, 2210-X,
2280, 229Q-X,
2310, 2320-X.
FHa: PercData_NlSvcs_May6_
Sheet: Env Restoration-Cleanup, Other , Method 314 reporting lim~ is 4 ppb Page 60 0175
Regulatory

Source of Perchlorate {Operations.
Location
Detected
(Media)
I I I I I
Analytical
Interest (Cleanup
irequested,
Method Potential Pathway(s) of Exposur per~ittlng
reqUIrements,
I Funding Type
,
sampling
requirements)
I
Various firing
I I I I I I
ranges and
impact areas.
Includes parcels:
Analyses
73Q-X, 870-X,
performed at the
910-X, 114Q-X. EPA Method
\ request of
1150,116Q-X, 314.0; son
Possible contamination from weapons firing regulatory
,Fort McClellan. Calhoun 1117Q-X. 1350 MRL -40 to
Army and impacts during h1storteal training Subsurface soft 0 162 NO none agencies (EPA I BRAC
County, Alabama X. 138Q-X. 1 68 ppb and
aclivOies. and ADEM)
X, 14OQ-X, 141 sediment 90
X,1420-X, during sOe
ppb
investigation
1510. 1B1(7}.
phase.
194(7),2000,
2010, 2210-X,
2280, 229Q-X,
2310, 2320-X.
-
Various firing
ranges and
impact areas.
Includes parcels:
Analyses
730-X, B70-X,
perlormed at the
910-X. 1140-X.
request of
1150, 1160-X,
Army
tort McClellan, Calhoun 11170-X. 1350
County, Alabama X, 138Q-X, 139
Possible contamination from weapons firing
and impacts during historical training Groundwater 4 38 1.2 - 2.55 ppb'
EPA 314.0
(MRL - 5-4 Possible water ingestion
regulatory
agencies (EPA I BRAC
activities. ppb) and ADEM}
X, 14OQ-X, 141
during sOe
X,1420-X,
investigation
1510,181(7),
phase.
194(7),2000.
2010, 2210-X,
2280, 2290-X,
2310, 2320-X.
File: PercDataflSvcs_May6_
Sheet: Env Resloralion-Cleanup, Other • Method 314 reporting limO is 4 ppb Page 61 of 75
Regulatory
Service I Facility , S"e I

Equipment. Actlvitlesl I
Location
Detected
(Media)
I I I I I
N be f
D::Ctl~:a Number of Range of A Iyt" I requested,
Samples Concentrations :th: Potential Pathway(s) of Exposure ~illing
Collected Detected (ppb) requrements,
I
Interest (Cleanup
I Funding Type
samprong
requirements)
I
Various firing
I I I I I I I
ranges and
impact areas.
Includes parcels:
Analyses
730-X, 87Q·X,
performed at the
91Q-X. 114Q-X,
Army
{ort McClellan, Calhoun
county. Alabama
r1150, 116Q-X,
X, 138Q-X, 13
Possible contaminatiOn from weapons f.-ing
HQ-X, 1350 and impacts during historiCal training
activfties.
Surface Water 1 41 2.66 ppb'
EPA 314.0
(MRL - 5-4 Possible water ingestion
ppb)
request of
regulatory
agencies (EPA
and ADEM)
I BRAe
X, 14OQ-X, 141
during sfte
X,142O-X,
investigatiOn
151Q, 181(7),
phase.
194(7), 2000,
201Q,221Q-X,
2280, 229Q-X,
231Q, 232Q-X.
Inilial sampling of
., RVAAP-16 Fuze
,Ravenna Army AmmunftlOllland Booster EPA 314.0 Dermal - Training by National Guard percNorates at
Army OB/OO of Mftftary Munitions Surface Water 2 10 7 and 25 ppb BRAe
Plant Ouarry Ponds MRL 1 ppb (Incidental Exposure) RVAAP reuested I
by Olio EPA
Army ,Ravenna Army AmmunilionjRVAAP-44 Load

Plant Line 11
IMuni\"Ions LAP Facftily
I Groundwater
I 0
I 10
I NO
I EPA314.0
MRL4 ppb
none
loftial sampling of
percNorates at
RVAAP reuesled I
BRAC
by Ohio EPA
Army JFort HuaehJca I wesllSoultVEast!OBJOO

Range I I I soft 67 242 127.000 ppb (max) I EPA 314.0 None known - besides soft
ingestion, inhalation
State developing
an actiOn level
I IMAI Surface
WaterRO
State using
Caney Lake as
Emergency Feed
Army IRed River Army Depot I OBOO 10pen Bum and detonation activfties I Groundwater I 0 1 198 I NO 1314.01 MRL 41
15 ppb
none
rater for other
lakes. Slate has
sampled with the
I IMAI Surface
WaterRO
Army and found
no Perchlorate in
lake.
F~e: PercOata_AlISvcs_May6_
Sheet: Env Restoration-Cleanup, Other • Method 314 reporting limft is 4 ppb Page 62 of 75
Regulatory

EqUipment, Activities) I
Location
Detected
(Media)
I I I I I
D::a~~ns
N b of Number of Range of
M:~~aI
An
Potential Pathwayls) of Exposure
Interest (Cleanup
~itIing
requested.
reqUirements,
I Funding Typs
sampling
requirements)
State using
Caney Lake as
Emergency Feed
Army IRed River Army Depot I 00 10pen detonation activity I Stormwater I 26 I 26 I 417 ppb max I EPA 314.0 I
Discharge to public drinking water rater for other
source-S""eral miles to Caney takes. State has
Lake sampled with the
I IMNSUrface
WalerRO
Army and found
no Perchlorate in
lake.
Army tRed River Army Depot I OB1 &2 10pen Bum activity I Stormwater I 11 I 26 I 55 to 71 ppb I I
EPA314.0 sourat-Several mUes to Caney Emergency Feed
'StlItlnJSll'1!
Discharge to public drinking water caney Lake as I IMNSurface
WaterRO
Lake water for other
Army IRed River Army Depot J X-1 ISanitary Sewer Plant I Groundwater I 1 I 14 I 6.8ppbmax I 314
Discharge to public drinking water caney Lake as
I source-Saveral miles to Caney Emergency Feed
I IMNSurfaca
WalerRO
Lake water for other
State using
caney Lake as
Emergency Feed
Army IRed River Army Depot I X-1 ISanitary Sewer Plant I Sedimant I 0 I 5 I NO I EPA314.0 I none
water for other
Ilakes. State has
sampled with the
I IMNSurface
WaterRO
Army and found
no Perchlorale in
lake.
-
State using
caney Lake as
Emergency Feed
Army IRed River Army Depot \ •)(,-1 ISanitary Sewer Plant I Soil I 2 I 51 I 226 ppb I
Lake several moles away
water for other
EPA 314.0 , Runoff to Surface Water to Caney Ilakes. State has
sampled with the
I IMNSurface
WaterRO
Army and found

no Perchlorate in
lake.
-
State has verballYI
IMNSurface
Army I camp Bullis Training Stte I OB/OD, MW1 \OBOD \ Groundwater I 3 I unava'able I 15.2 - 22 ppb I I
EPA 314 Several miles to Water Supply Weill requested to
WaterRO
sample.
Army camp Bullis Training Stte 2.33 • 4.91 ppb' Several miles to Water Supply Well
State has verbally
requested to
sample.
I IMNSurface
WaterRO
FHe: PercData_A1ISvcs_May6_
Sheet: Env Restoration-Cleanup, O1her • Method 314 reporting limtt is 4 ppb Page 63 0175
Regulatory

Equipment, ActIvities) I
Location
Detected
(Media)
I I I I I
D~:'I~:S
N be f Number of Range of
An Iytl I
Interest (Cleanup
requested,
M:thoC: Potential Pathway(s) of Exposure permitting
requirements,
I Funding Type
sampling
requirements)
State has Verball"

IMNSurface
Asmy I Camp Bullis Training Stte I OB/OD, MW7 1060D I Groundwater I 2 I IRIvailabie I 6.4 - 9.3 ppb I I
EPA 314 severfll miles to Water Supply Weill requested to
WaterRO
sample.
Slate has Verball"1 IMN Surface

Asmy I Camp Bullis Training Stte I 0B/OD,W2 10BOO I Groundwater I 3 I unava~able I 3.18 - 345 ppb' I EPA 314.0 I Several miles to Water Supply Weill naquested to
WaterRO
sample.
State has VerbaHyl1

Asmy I Camp Bullis Training Sae I OB/OD,W3 10BOO I Groundwater t 2 I unavailable I ,2.55 - 4.48 ppb' I EPA 314.0 ISeveral miles to Water Supply WelIl requested to
IMN Surface
waterRO
sample.
State will include
I I I (archlorate at I
Army I
McAlester Army
Ammunition Plant
IRocket Lake Potential source - OB/OD Surface Water 0
I
26
I
ND
I EPA 314 lnone Permn renewal
(negotiations on
IMN Surface
WaterRO
going).
I~ mondoring Notnaquired
I Umatilla Chemical Depot I~';;'ationm

(sampling
Army activfties Groundwater 5 5 5.0·9.6 EPA 314 No exposure pathway known
conducted in
I IMA
unavaRabie 1990's)
Notnaquired
139 monnoring
(sampling
Asmy I UmatRIa Chemical Depot lwells, information activfties Groundwater 0 39 ND EPA 314 none
conducted in
I IMA
unava~able
1990's)
I I I I I I
NJDEP and EPA
I 1421PICA 111 drinkibng water wells within 1/4 m~el want addftonal I
Army I Picalinny Arsenal
perchlorate production, dispooal and
(RI concept sne) research related activfties I Groundwater 5 (including
duplicate)
11 2.6 - 616 ppb' EPA 314
of plume sampling for IRP
investigation
lMNNERO
Asmy I Picalinny Arsenal

I 1421PICA 111 I
perch/orate production, disposal and
(RI concept sRe) research related activfties I soil
I
I 2
21 (incl.
dups)
up to 500 ppb
of plume
NJDEP and EPA
drinking water wells within 1/4 mile want addftonal I
sampling for lRP

IMNNERO
investigation
100
(including
I~~~~ pr~uction, disposal and

Army I Picalinny Arsenal lperchlorate
Boundary wells) research actrvnl6S
I I
I
Groundwater 0
dups for
quarterly
sampling
program
I ND
I EPA 314 0000
1
INJDEP, EPA,
Developer
I IMNNERO
potential pathway through bedrock
Army I Picatinny Arsenal

JOpen Detonation Disposal and detonation activfties Groundwater 13 42 up to 20 ppb
l hbori
EPA 314 10 ne 9 ng township where I
NJDEP ReRA
I IMNNERO
Area perchlorate has been delected at < '
1 ppb
Disposal and
No potential pathways known INJDEP required I
Army I Fort Dix ~nation OB/OD Groundwater 1 4 NO- 28 ppb' EPA 314
samplIng
IMNNERO
activfties
File: PercData_A1ISvcs_MayB_
Sheet: Env Resloralioo-Qeanup, Other

• Method 314 reporting limn is 4 ppb Page 64 of 75
Regulatory

Location
Detected
(Media)
I I I I I
N b of Number of
~:c::m.
Range of
Collected
Detected (ppb)
A a1ytl aI ,requested'
Samples
Concentrations
;e~ Potential Pathway(s) of Exposur permitting
requirements,
Interest (Cleanup
I Funding Type
sampling
requirements)
FX training foeld PA
Army I Aberdeen Proving Ground I (western study Training - pyrotechnics and smokes
Groundwater
63 125
NO-23.4pPb·
un suppl'illS weter to the C'ity 0 fradvisorieslrecom

314.0/1ppb IAA~er and MOE I
IMAINERO
(Monitoring well)
boundary area) een mendations
Army I Aberdeen Proving Ground I FTXAREA ITraining - pyrotechnics and smokes I

Groundwater
(OPT)
249 \ 268 NO - 3,500 ppb'
314.0/1 ppb
STL-M-Ctoo Aberdeen by EPA

I
and Aquifer supplies water to the City of Recommended
I IMAl NERO
SOOppb
Army I Aberdeen Proving Ground I FTXAREA ITraining - pyrotechnics and smokes I Soil (borings) I 202 I 610 I NO - 12000
,
ppb' 1314.0/10 b Leach down t~ Aquifer that supplies Recommended I
pp water to the City of Aberdeen lMAINERO
by EPA
r
I NO I 314 0/ 4 pb ILeach down to Aquifer that supplies
Recommended
Army I Aberdeen Proving Ground I FTXAREA ITraining - pyrotechnics and smokes I Surface Water I 0 J 4
. P water to the City of Aberdeen I
by EPA
IMAl NERO
Leach down to Aquifer that supplies Recommended

Army I Aberdeen Proving Ground I FTXAREA ITraining - pyrotechnics and smokes I sediment I 0 I 4 I NO 1314.0/10ppb
water to the City of Aberdeen by EPA
I IMAINERO
314.0/ Leach down to Aquifer that supplies Recommended

Army I Aberdeen Proving Ground I FTXAREA Training - pyrotechnics and smokes surface soi 21 128 NO-590 ppb
10ppb' water to the Cly of Aberdeen by EPA
I IMAINERO
v,:rious . Activities involving usage of propellants,

I Aberdeen Proving Ground I area ranges In . Recommended
Army the Ed ewood ordnance, cIored smokes and chemical Soil (borings) 1 11 0.42J 314.0/1ppb none by EPA I IMNNERO
g agents
area
--
Army I Aberdeen PrOVing· Ground I areas
v~rious
ra es In
. /ActivitieS involving usage of propellants,
.
the Ed:COO ordnance, elored smokes and chemICal
g agents
I Surface Water I 0
I 23
I NO I 314.0/4ppb lnone I
Recommended
by EPA I IMNNERO
r
area
-
Army
· Variouses in cfIVit·IllS .Inv01'Vlng usage of propeIJant
areas/ra
I Aberdeen ProVIng Ground I the Ed:aoo ordnance, clored smokes and chemICal
. s,
I sediment
I I I 3 17 NO to 17 ppb'
I I314.0/
100ppb none known
I
Recommended
by EPA
I IMAlNERO
g agents
area
--
v,:nous . Activities involving usage of propellants,
314.0/ Recommended
Army I Aberdeen ProVing· Ground r area ranges III .
the Ed ewood ordnance, elored smokes and chemICal surface soil 1 3 NO - 7.7.ppb
100ppb
none known
by EPA
I IMNNERO
g agents
area
In small creek Coordinating

Off site migration confirmed along
Army I Redstone Arsenal I near English Rocket exploration operation soil unavaUabie unavaRabie up to 37,000 ppb' 314.0
easte,," boundary
progress w~h I IMNSERO
Vilage regulators
Sheet: Env Restoration-Cleanup, Other • Method 314 reporting limit is 4 ppb Page 65 of75
Regulatory
service I Facility I Site I

Sou{ce of Pe{chlo{ate (Operations,
Location
Detected
(Media)
I I I I I
N be f Numbe{ of
Dut'::ct, { 0 Samples Concent{atlons Met~ Potential Pethway(s) of Exposu{e permitting'
Range of Analytl I
e ons Collected Detected ( p p b ) { e q u i t " e m e n t s .
requested I Inte{est (Cleanup
I Funding Type
sampling
requir"ements)
AITIIY I Redstone Arsenal I

Below smao I
creek near Rocket exploration operation
English Vinage I Iumva~able I I
Groundwater unavaMable u p 10 19.000ppb'\ 314.0
Potential pathway to wetlands used
for '!lC'"ealion. Also potential for
uplake in wetland grasses used for
Coordinating
progress with
regulators
, IMAISERO
feed for beef cattle.
I EPA 31414
Army ( Lake City AAP I Area 18 (Historic operalionslbuming I Groundwaler I 0 I 18 I NO
20ppb
none
I sampling
reqUirements
I IMAINWRO
Per~alehas
been detected in
the Lakewood
Water District
drinking waler
Army I Fort Lewis

Monitoring wells
I around Impact
areas
I Impact areas
1
Groundwater
I I 0 12
1
NO
I I EPA 314 None
I
production wells.
Fl.lsMs.
McChord AFB. I lMAINWRO
and Lakewood
Waler District are
withinlhe
of the ·Central
Pierce County
Aquifer' Sole
Source Aquifer
Percl'lorate has
been detected in
the Lakewood
Water District
drinking waler
production wells.
FI. Lewis.
Army Fort Lewis Springs around IImpact areas surface Water o 5 NO EPA 314 none McChord AFB, I IMAI NWRO
Impact areas
and Lakewood
Water District are
within the footprintl
of the "central
Pierce County
Aquifer" Sole
Source Aquifer
Fne: PercDataflISvcs_May6_
Sheet: Env Resloration-C1earup. Other • Method 314 reporting limn is 4 ppb Page 66 of 75
Regulatory

Source of Perchlorete (Operetions,
Locetion
Detected
(Media)
I I I I I ..
Number of Number of
Det~ons
.
Range
Samples Concentrabons
~f Analytical
Interest (Cleanup
requested,
requirements,
I Funding Type
sampling
requirements)
Perchlorate has
been detected in
the Lakewood
Water Oisbict
drinking water
production wells.
FI. Lewis.
~my I Fort Lewis I Nisqually River (Impact areas I sediment I 0 I 3 I NO I EPA 314 I none I McChord AFB. I IMAINWRO
end Lakewood
Water District are
within the footpril
of the "Central
Pierce County
Aquifer" Sole
Source AqlJifer
Building 528
Future perm~
Ammun~ion
~my I Fort Wingate I Normal Mun~ion Dem~ so~ 29 31 NO- 3.18 ppm
IMAINWRO
Maintenance
cleanup
Building
Future permtt
Former TNT
Army I Fort Wingate I Washout Munttion Dem~ soil 1 11 NO-0.10ppm
modifoed sampling and
IMAINWRO
Fac~ies
cleanup
Future perm~
Former TNT
requirements for I
Army I Fort Wingate I Washout Mumion Oemil Groundwater 12 47 NO -76.6ppb· EPA 314.0
sampling and
IMAINWRO
Facil~ies
cleanup
Former TNT Future perm~
Washout 2,440 ppb - 2,890 requirements for J
Army I Fort Wingate I Fac~tties and
Mun~ion Dem~ Groundwater 2 2
ppb
EPA 314.0
sampling and
IMAINWRO
Building 528 cleanup
Forl)ler TNT
Future permtt
Washout
requirements for I
Army I Fort Wingate I Fac~tties and Munttion Dem~ Groundwater 2 17 NO- 9.4 ppb' EPA 314.0
sampling and
IMAINWRO
Buildings 542 I
cleanup
600
--
Former TNT
Future perm~
Washout
requirements for I
Army I Fort Wingate I Facil~ies and Mun~ion Oemil Groundwater 0 16 NO - 10.0 ppb' 314.0
sampling and
IMAINWRO
Adminstration
cleanup
Area
F~e: PercOata_A1ISvcs_Mey6_
Sheet: Env Restoralio~anup, Other • Method 314 reporting lim~ is 4 ppb Page 67 of 75
Regulatory

Location
Detected
(Media)
I I I I I
N b f Number of Range of
D:Ct:: Samples Concentrations
An Iytl I
M:thOC: Potential Pathway(s) of Exposure ~itting
Interest (Cleanup
requested.
requirements.
I Funding Type
sampling
requirements)
Former TNT
Washout
Future permit
Facmties and
I requirements for I
Army I Fort Wingate I Northern
Munition Oemil Groundwater 0 8 NO 314.0 None
sampling and
IMAINWRO
Property cleanup
Boundary
Future permit
Sewage \
requirements for I
Army I Fort Wingate I Treatment Munition Demit Groundwater 0 2 NO 314.0 none sampling and
IMAINWRO
FaciUly
cleanup
Army I Fort Wingale I OBl~Area - IMUnition Demit I

Groundwaler
I I 1 14
I NO -10.0 ppb
I
314.0
I
I Future permit
requirements for I IMAINWRO
sampling and
cleanup
Future permit
I OBiOO Area requirements for I
Army I Fort Wingate
current
Munition Demi Groundwater 14 39 NO - 15.0 ppb' 314.0
samplilg and
lMAINWRO
cleanup
Surface
ingestion of soil. dermal contact. or Site
Army
ICrane Army Ammunition IWaterMU3
Ammunition Open Burning Operalions
Surface and
5 100 0-470 ppb'
EPA Method inhalation of windblown particles. characterization J
AMC-JMC
Activity subsurface so~ 314.0 No known patheay to drinking water for RCRA
Buming Ground
source. Corrective Action
& Old Jeep Trai
Iowa Army Ammunition

Army I Plant
East Burn Pads Unknown - potential source - OB/OD Groundwater 1 12 0-8.8ugIL' I 314.0/4uglL I none or limited I sampling I AMC-JMC
Iowa Army Ammunition North Burn Pads

Army I Plant LF
Unknown - potential source - OBiOD Groundwater 1 10 0-3.2ug/L' I 314.0I4ug/L I none or limited I sampling I AMC-JMC
Army I
Iowa Army Ammunition Inert Disposal
Unknown Groundwater 1 20 I
o-<8.8ugll. (Matrix 3140/4ugiL I none or limited I sampling I AMC-JMC
Plant Area
Interference)' .
Iowa Army Ammunition Line BOO/Pink

Army I Plant Water Lagoon
Unknown - potential source - LAP Groundwater 1 12 0-28uglL' 314.0/4ugiL none or limited sampling I AMC-JMC
Army I
Lone Star Army
Ammunition Plant
I High Explosives
Burning Grounds
Potential source - OB/OD Groundwater 1 8 up to 7.95 ppb'
EPA Method
314.0
Ingestion
Site
forRCRA
I
characterization ER A (AMC-JMC)
•
Corrective Action
Army I
Lone Star Army
Ammunition Plant I Production
Building P-29
Production Soil (Surface) 1 1 8.86 ppb
EPA Method
314.0
ingestion. dermal contact. inhalation
permitting
requirements
I
ER.A (AMC-JMC)
Army
I Radford Army Ammunition
Plant
I Surface
WaterMU 54
Groundwater 1 4 NO-10.7' 314 No exposure pattway known
Installation
Restoration I AMC-JMC
Program
Installation
Radford Army Ammunition
Army
Plant
aU NO none Restoration I AMC-JMC

Program
File: PercOata_AfISvcs_May6_
Sheet: Env Restoration-Cleanup. Other ' Method 314 reporting limit is 4 ppb Page 68 of 75
Regulatory
Service I Facility I Site J

Location
Detected
(Media)
I I I I I
Number of Number of Range~
Detections Samples CORCentrallons
Collected Detected (ppbl
Analytical
Interest (Cleanup
jrequested,
Method Potential Pathway(a) of Exposure per~itting
requirements.
I Funding Type
sampling
requirements)
Army I Radford Ar~~:mmunltion I New River Unit I I Surface Water I 1

I 24
I ND-1.71'
I 314
I none
I
Instanation
Restoration I AMC-JMC
~ram
SedimenlWA
Administrative
Orders, sampling
Disposal. Open BlXfl10pen Detonation. requirements,
IArtil ery Firing (L1TR Rounds), Firworks Use
Army I
MassachJsetts Military
Reservation (MMR) I Demo 1
and Disposal, Military Training with
Pyrotechnics .
SO/l 12 171 NO - 26.88'
314.013.2
ppb
Sole source aquifer used for
drinkingwmer
cleanup
requested,
provision of
I ARNG
aiternate water
supplies
requested.
SedimenlWA
Administrative
Orders, sampling
Disposal, Open Burn/Open Detonation, requirements.
Massachusetts MDitary Artillery Firing (L1TR Rounds), Firwor1<s Use 314.013.2 Sole source aquifer used for cleanup
Army CIA Soil 5 194 ND-41000 ARNG
Reservation (MMR) and Disposal, MDitary Training with ppb drinkilg water requested,
Pyrotechnics provision of
aitemate water
supplies
requested.
SedimentWA
Administrative
Orders, sampling
Disposal, Open Burn/Open Detonation, requirements.
Massachusetts Military Southeast Artmery Firing (L1TR Rounds), Firworks Use 314.0/3.2 Sole source aquifer used for cleanup
Army Soil 67 511 NO -134000' ARNG
Reservation (MMR) Ranges and Disposal, Military Training with ppb drinking water requested,
aiternate water
supplies
requested.
File: PercData_AlISvcs_MayB_
Regulatory

Location
Detected
(Media)
I I I I I
N be f Number of
D~~~~S
Range of
A Iyt' I
;~h:C:
Interest (Cleanup
requested.
Potential Pathway(s) of Exposure ~ilting
requirements.
I Funding Type
sampling
requirements)
Disposal, Open Burn/Open Detonation, Administrative

Massachuselts Military I Northwest IArtillery Firing (UTR Rounds), Firworks Use 314.0/3.2 Sll'e source aquifer used for Orders. sampling I
Army I Reservation (MMR) Comer and Disposal, MUItary Trailing with
Soil 20 116 ND-7560'
ppb drinking water requIrements.
ARNG
Pyrotechnics cleanup
~
SedimentWA
Administrative
Orders. sampling
Disposal, Open Burn/Open Detonation, requirements,
Army I
Massachusetts MBijary
Reservation (MMR) I
Western IArtUIery Firing (LITR Rounds), FIrworks Use
Boundary . and Disposal. MUijary Training with
Pyrotechnics
Soil 0 92 NO
314.0/3.2
ppb
none
cleanup
requested.
provision of
I ARNG
alternatewater
supplies
requested.
-
SedimentWA
Administrative
Orders, sampling
Disposal, Open Burn/Open Detonation. requirements,
Massachusetts Military I E erything EI IArtBlery Firing (L1TR Rounds). Firworks Use 314.0/3.2 Sole source aquifer used for cleanup
Army I Reservation (MMR) v se and Disposal. Mil~ary Training with
SoU 1 107 NO - 60'
ppb drinking water requested.
I ARNG
alternate water
supplies
requested.
SedimenlWA
Administrative
Orders. sampling
Disposal. Open Burn/Open Detonation, requirements.
Massachusetts Mi!ijary I IArtUIery Firing (UTR Rounds). FIrworks Use 314.0/1.0 Sole source aquifer used for cleanup
Army I Reservation (MMR)
Demo 1
and Disposal, MU~ary Training with
Groundwater 143 604 ND- 500'
ppb drinking water requested.
I ARNG
alternate water
SuPplies
requested.
SedimentWA
Administrative
Orders, sampling
Army I Massachusetts MUnary

Reservation (MMR)
I
CIA
Disposal, Open Burn/Open Detonation,
IArtillery Firing (UTR Rounds), Firworks Use

and Disposal, Mil~ary Training with
Groundwater 72 1280 ND- 33'
314.011.0
ppb
drinking water
requirements,
cleanup
requested.
I ARNG
alternate water
supplies
requested.
I I I ! I I I I I I
FHe: PercData_A1lSvcs_May6_
Sheet: Env Restoration-Cleaoop, Other

' Method 314 reporting limij is 4 ppb Page 70 of 75
Regulatory

location
Detected
(Media)
I I I I I.
Detections Samples Concenlralrons
~ Analytical
Intarest (Cleanup
irequested,
Method Potenlral Pathway(s) of Exposur per~iIIing
requrements.
I Funding Type
sampling
requirements)
SedimentWA
Administrative
Orders. sampling
Army I Massachusetts Military

Reservation (MMR)
I Disposal, Open BumIOpen Detonation.
southeast IArtUlery Firing (UTR Rounds). Firworks Use
Ranges and Disposal, MUitary Training with
Groundwater 81 1023 ND-3W
314.0/1.0
ppb
drinking water
requirements,
cleanup
requested.
I ARNG
alternate water
supplies
requested.
SedimentWA
Administrative
Orders. sampling
Army I Massachusetts Mllary

Reservation (MMR)
I Disposal, Open Bum'Open Detonation,
Northwest IArtUlery Firing (lITR Rounds). Firworks Use
Corner and Disposal, MUlary Training with
Groundwater 39 99 NO -19.3'
314.0/ 1.0
ppb
drinking water
requirements.
cleanup
requested.
I ARNG
alternate water
SuPplies
requested.
-
SedimentWA
Administrative
Orders, sampling
Army I
Massachusetts MUitary
Reservation (MMR) I Western
Boundary
I
Disposal. Open Bum/Open Detonation,
Artillery Firing (lITR Rounds), Firworks Use
and DiSposal, MUilary Training with
Groundwater 36 3029 NO -2.89'
314.0/1.0
ppb
Sole source·aquifer used for
drinking water
requirements,
cleanup
requested,
I ARNG
alternate water
supplies
requested.
-
SedimentWA
Administrative
Orders, sampling
Army I
Massachusetts Military
Reservation (MMR)
I Disposal. Open Burn/Open Detonation,
E erythi EJ IArtillery Firing (lITR Rounds). Firworks Use Groundwater
v ng se and Disposal. MUUary Training with
13 488 NO - 17.7'
314.0/1.0
ppb
drinking water
requirements,
cleanup
requested,
I ARNG
alternate water
supplies
requested.
I
00 PUS 10, 11, 314.0/2.0
Army I GampNavajo
17
Munlons disposal surface water 3 11 ND- 37'
ppb
drinking water RCRA I ARNG
Kerr-McGee Groundwater Groundwater/surface water. A RegUlatory and
Kerr-McGee Perchlorate
Army 1 FUDS Perchlorate Source - Chemical Manufacturing Surface Water 3,700,000 ppb, NA perchlorate contaminated congressional. I FUDS
Plant. Henderson, NV
Plant, Surface Water roundwater nlume extends from Kerr-McGee
FDe: PercData_AUSvcs_May6_
Sheet: Env Restoratio....aeanup. Other

' Method 314 reporting Iiml is 4 ppb Page 71 of 75
Regulatory
Service I Facility J Site I

Equipment. ActIvities) I
Location
Detected
(Media)
I I I I I
N be of Number of
D::ctl~ns
Range of
A Iytl I
~~h~a
Interest (Cleanup
,requested.
Potential Pathway(s) of Exposur per~ilting
reqUIrements.
I Funding Type
sampling
reqUirements)
Groundwater 31 to
81 ppb
I I NA Groundwater INA I FUDS
Rialto (formerly
Rialto (formerly Rialto riatto
Army / FUOSIAmmunilion Supply Point), Ammunition Isource - Fireworks FacDily(?). BF Goodrich'ID 'nk' Water
Rocket Research and Manufacturing n Ing I I I OW >4 ppb and
811 ppb
I NA I
Drinking water supply wells
IRegional Water
Board
I FUDS·
Riatto, CA Supply Point).
Riatto. CA
Ar / FUOSIShumaker NAD, Camden,

my AR "Landfilr
. k""'I---
le.La~:-
a7 erAR • perchlorate out'of rocket motors and
disposed of large pieces of AP in an open
burning unit.
Groundwater 3 16
Groundwater-Ql
413 uglL:
850 ugfL;
Groundwater-Q20
475 uglL
I
Groundwater-Q1D EPA 314 - ISurficial A uifer
Water q
IEPA TlYeatened I
7003 Order
FUOS
USACE conducted groundwater sample

Former Walker coUection and analysis of percl'lorate in Nov ISamPle collection
Arm / FUDSI Former Walker AFB. IAFB, RoSlrlace 03. The samples were collected near an Groundwater NO 3 NO 1314/0.0041
requested by the I
FUOS
y RoSurface Waterell, NM mgn (POL) none State of New
Waterell. NM OB/OO and rocket lest facHity. Perchlorate
Mexico
was non-detect
Tyson Valley
Tyson Valley Powder Farm'rowder Farm, EPA tested for perchlorate and did not
I
Army / FUOS Eureka. MO (AOCs 15-17. Eureka. MO locate any at the explosive storage and !Groundwater I NO I I NO I 314 INone IEPA I FUDS
23-29.31 and 34) (AOCs 15-17, 23 testing facility
29. 31 and 34)
Nebraska
Arm / FUOS INebraska Ordnance Plant, I Ordnance Plant, EPA.has sampled for Perchlorate down Groundwater NO NO I 314 I None IEPA I FUOS
Y Mead. NE Mead. NE gradlllnt of a former fireworks manufacturer
Sample w!jch
,my
I
Ar / FUOS Nebraska Ordnance Plant. 0 d
MedNE
a.
I
Nebraska
PI nt USACE manHored East of Load line 4 at thE Groundwater
rnancea, Former Ordnance Plant
Mead. NE
1 2
showed
contaminated was I
estimated to be
314 INone INA I FUOS
3ppb
Blaine Naval
USACE sampled for perchlorate at the
Arm / FUDSI Blaine Naval AmmunHion IAmmUnftion Ordnance Plant during the 2002 NAO-wide Groundwater NO 58 None 1EPA Method I INA I FUDS
Y Depot. Hastings. NE Depot. Hastings. 314.0 none
sampling event
NE
Army / FUOS I~~OA Nike 60. Gardner, KCOA Nike 60. USACE sampled Jor Perchlorate at the
Soil 2 4
25.4 ppbaoo
Method 9058
Direct contact of soD with students NA
I FUDS
Gardner. KS grade school at the Former Nike SHe 37.6 ppb at grade school
Sampling
Army / FUOS I~:on AFB. Moses Lake. LarsonAFB. Groundwater sampling Groundwater NO 2 NO 314 none suggested by I FUOS
Moses Lake, WA
EPA
FHe: PercOata_AIISvcs_May6_
Sheet: Env RestoratiOn-Cleanup. Other • Method 314 reporting IimH is 4 ppb Page 72 of 75
• Regulatory

Location
Detected
(Media)
I I I I I
N be f Number of
D~~etl~:S
Range of
An Iyf aI
Interest (Cleanup
requested,
M:u.':J Potential Pathway(s) of Exposure ~ing
requirements,
I Funding Type
lsampling
requirements)
EPA and Virginia

DEQ believe all
ordnance related
s~es have the
~l
Detection
potential for
percNorate
Nansemond rNT Steam Out area known to be Lim~was
Ar / FUOs,NansemOnd Ordnance
my Depot. Suffolk VA IOrdnance Depot. contaminate with bulk TNT and other
Suffolk VA Ordnance and Explosive debris.
IGroundwater
I NO
'/ 3
I NO /0.97 uglL a none
the Reporting
Lim~was 10
contamination.
Based on their
interest
percIjorate was
I FUDS
uglL.
added to the list
ofCoCs for
testing at the
FNOO TNT area.
In FY02. at the
request of the
State of
MassacOOsetts.
Hingham Bum S~e

Army/FUDSID01~023207
Massacrosetts
r~~
ingham
Bum I
MA023207 Explosive Residue
Massacrosetts
I I I I
I I
Groundwater NO 3 NO NA
none
NAEsampled
lseral (37) wells
for various
contaminants
related to
I FUDS
explosive residue.
one of which was
perchlorate.
Nothing was
found.
I I I I I I I I I I
Air Force Perchlorate Survey - Environmental Restoration - Cleanup, Other
closed bombing
Air Force New Boston AFS range bombing operation (old target) Gromdwater, so~ NO NO 314 OERP
2 None State
OD029/SWMU TDEe momoring DERP

Air Force ArnoldAFB 98 Disposal operations at OB/OO s~e Groundwater 12 27 2.7 - 1000 314 Groundwater/Lim~ed reqUirement
PatriCk AFB/Cape Groundwater, stat
Rocket Operationsllaunches OERP
Air Force Canaveral launchMes Groundwater NO 1 ND
314 None e
Air Force Poinsett Range OT-19 OB/OO operations Groundwater 1 11 8.4
314 None None DERP
LF001. 006, 007, None (for s~e
Air Force Duluth. Reserve center None Groundwater NO. OERP
010 4 NO
314 None close out)
Soo, Sediment,
None, Re-test
Research, Development, Test and Groundwater,
result in Non- DERP
PUr Force Holloman AFB Bldg 1176 Evaluation Surface Water 1 2 7600
314 None detect
EOO Range
Kirtland AFB OB/OD Surface Soil DERP
Air Force Area 1 1 16200 314 Surface ~ - not a direct pathway NMEOSurvey
FDe: PercOata_AIISvcs_May6_
Sheet: Env Restoration-Cleanup, Other • Method 314 reporting lim~ is 4 ppb Page 73 of 75
Regulatory

Source of Per~hlorate(Opemlons,
EquIpment, Activities) I
Location
Detected
(Media)
I I I I I.
Detec:tloM Samples Concentrations
Collected Detected Ippb)
Analyti~al
Method
Interest (C1earup
requested,
Potent.al Pathway(s) of Exposure ~ilting
reqUIrements,
I Funding Type .
sampling
requirements)
I I I I I I t I
DTRA-Chestnut
OERP
Air Force Kirtland AFB sne 00 Surface Soa 1 1 33000 314 Surface SOU - not a direct pathway NMEO
OT22 (which
covers all
groundwater on OERP
AFP4and Fire training areas, ejection seats, Carswell
Air Force Plant 4 Carswell AFBI) activities? Groundwater NO 4 NO 314 None State
missile des 2 &
OERP
Air Force McConnell Titan Sites 17 missile storage/maintenance Grooodwater NO 2 NO 314 None State
Air Force Offutt AFB EODRange none Groundwater NO 1 NO 314 None StatelEPA OERP
Various missile storage and aircrall Groundwater, OERP

Air Force Ellsworth AFB monitoring wells mainlenance(maybe OBlOO) GrOllndwater NO 12 NO 314 None state
HiIIAFB
Zone 1500
23 different
monitoring
wells with
detections,
sampled at
least anl"lJally
some semi
annual and
some OERP
quarterfy. Hili
HUI AFB - Shallow AFBZone
Hill AFB - ZOnes groundwater in 1900·1 well HilAFB-ZQne
1500 and 1900; Zones 1500 and with 1500 - 70 ppb to
Lillie Mnt 1900; Little Mnt. detections NO; Zone 1900
Facility - sludge Facility - one round 16.6 ppb to NO; Hill AFB siles - No current exposure
drying beds; Groundwater only, 11 other Little Mnt.· 1100 pathway but potential future drinking
Utah Test and Hill AFB Zone 1500 - Historic missile/rocket below the sludge monitoring to 85 ppb; UTTR water exposure. little Mnt.
Training Range testing and munition manufacturing; Hill drying beds; points north - 0.0255 Exposure pathway not known
(UTT~) ~ mise AFB ZOne 1900 • Missile testing and "hog- UTTR· in shallow sampled; mg/kg 'note; because plume is undefined, human
historic OBIOO out" operations; Little Mnt. Facilny - soils at one of the UtIle Mnt. detection limits in exposure very unlikely, though.
snes across antidotal stories of historic OB of missae four locations two wells groundwater ecological exposure likely in Great
Air Force HiJlAFB north range area and rocket motors in area of sludge drying tested 31 sam currently 4 ppb 314 Sail Lake SOU. GrOllndwater
Environmental
Restoration
Air Force Plant PJKS ST035/ST022 ManufacturinglMaintenance GrOllndwater Non-detect 6 Non-<letect 314 GW, state Account (ERA)
34(17
sne 282,North wells/semi- Internal - ROT&E OERP
Air Force EdwardsAFB Base, JPL Propulsion research at JPL Groundwater 34 annual) NO-201 314 None State
File: PercOala_AIISvcs_May6_
Sheet: Env Restoralion-C1earup, Other • Method 314 reporting Iim~ is 4 ppb Page 74 of 75
Regulatory

Source of Perchlorete (Operations.
Location
Detected
(Media)
I I I
Number of Number of Range ~ I I
Analytical
Interest (Oeanup
1requested,
Detections Samples Concentrations Method Potential PathwaYls) of Exposu ~ilting
Collected Detected (ppb) reqrnemenls,
I Funding Type
sampling
requirements)
I I I I
Groundwater
32(16
32 wells/semi- OERP
Site 285, North Groundwater, annual) Sol- ND-30.700 Internal - ROT&E
Air Force EdwardsAFB Base, JPL Propulsion research at JPL Soil, Groundwater 37 SOIL 37 detects 2100000 sol 314 None State
6(3
AOC 422, North wells/semi- Internal - ROT&E OERP
\
MForce EdwardsAFB Base.JPL Maintenance at JPL Groundwater 6 anooal) ND-7.3 E300 None State
Intemal- ROT&E
OERP
Air Force EdwardsAFB SRe 116. AFRL Rocket Test Stand Groundwater 12 12-Jan 17-80 314 None State
Internal - ROT&E
OERP
MForce EdwardsAFB Site 120, AFRL Sewage Treatment Ponds Groundwater 18 58 NO-22 314 None State
lnternal- ROT&E
OERP
MForce EdwardsAFB Site 133,AFRL Landfill Groundwater 114 130 No-loo 314 None Slate
Sfte 1621313. Internal - ROT&E
OERP
Air Force EdwardsAFB AFRL Rocket Test Stand Groundwater 27 65 ND-250 314 None State
Internal - ROT&E
25 OERP
Air Force EdwardsAFB Sfte 177, AFRL Rocket Test Stand Groundwater 17 ND-847 314 None State
Internal - ROT&E
OERP
MForce EdwardsAFB Sfte 178, AFRL Rocket Test Stand Groundwater 8 7 234-570 314 None State
Internal - ROT&E
OERP
Air Force EdwardsAFB Site 325, AFRL Rocket Test Stand Groundwater 4 7 5-336 314 None State
Drinking Water
OERP
Air Force Onizuka AFS intake Drinking Water 314
5, 18,23 and 29;
18 Wells
DERP
including
drinking, fire and Research, Development, Test and 34 Dec 1999
A'I: Force Plant 42 monitor wells Evaluation Groundwater NO to Sep 2002 NO 314 None State, EPA
OERP
A'I: Force Plant 44 12 Groundwater aircraft maintenance. production Groundwater NO 3 (3 Wells) NO modifoed 300 None State
8MW4,8MW9,
8MW10,8MW11, OERP
8MW13,8MW16,
8MW18, 8MW19,
8MW2O,8MW21.
9MW3,9MW5,
Air Force Vandenberg AFB Site8Wster space Launch Complex 9MW6,9MW12 41 42 NO -517 314 None State, EPA
File: PercOata_AIlSvcs_May6_
SMet: Env Restoration-Cleanup, Other • Method 314 repor1ing limit is 4 ppb Page 75 of 75
031\OV\l3C1
38Vd
Summary of ARMY
9~t
Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule (UCMR) Perchlorate Data
progrom installation Name

- EPA
Roglon
Regulotooy
DrIvorCItod*
DWS_
(Surface or
G<oundwoter)
Sample
Collection
Locollon
SPIA moniloring
wets and Wei D
.UCMR
R.......
Compl.....
- ExpoclDd Ilolo(e)
Sompllr<g 1lIIto00Noxt Sompllng
Pia...... DWSempling Cond_
Sample 10_
Sompllngl
-1JIfco1
-....
Pe"'_ SompUng
-(ppb).
Comments or References
EPA request to sample Impact Area monloring

BRAC Fort 0"""", MA 1 EPA request GW l(!m_ e Yes Apr-()4 nle nle nle nle wells and nearby ttansient mncommldy
nonoommuniy supply W8II D-I
_woll)
Virginia
Depal1mont 01 , Requested epprowllrom HQOA 10 sample for
_lonI Anny Ammunitiol
AMClJMC VA 3 ErMonn1elUI perchIorates al drirWng water' Inlakes bl.I: have
PIonl
"
request
""'.-opprowI
Weier pIort. 1/31fl3; 419103;
IMA
Fort George_e MD 3 UCMR GWISW plenl tap, pen of 4 yes quarterly 1113103; EPA 314-1.1 NO
\ 10116f02
"'*Y
1214101,
Wot...plenl· none· pIort 9/11102.
lob d..ection ..... = 4 ugII.; plenl_ lor
IMA Fort Monroe VA 3 UCMR SW plenl tap, pen of 6 yes _01126 IlJI3OI02. EPA 314-1.1 NO
repairs during Iirsl hat 012002
---- --
"'*Y Sep03 4/25/00,
5I3lYD3, 913ID3
12102- 8103
IMA FortlJll< NJ 2 UCMR GW 4 yes quarterly EPA 314-1.1 NO
q-....
1/4l2OO4 ~
--
IMA FortDtum NY 2 UCMR GW 2 10l29I03 EPA 314-1.1 NO
quarterl{
210ct02,
EPA"""""" Sampling and 81lS11ysis aJrdueted by GA EPD
11M Fonlle<rinll GA 4 UCMR SW 4 none none 24Feb03; May NlA
314
NO
WPB
pIonI;
03. 6Aug03
sm-Wet«
4+03; ~10-03 Samplng eM enolysls OOfIducted by GA EPD
IMA FortGonfon GA 4 UCMR SW and GW Pllut and Range 2 None NlA NlA EPA314.e NO
9-9-03, 12-9-03 WPB
ConbtJIWei
IMA
IMA
t-kder Amy Mfie*I
FortStBwart
GA
GA
4
4
UCMR
UCMR
GW
GW
--
drtnl<k1gwat..
drWdngweler
Not sampled
Not sampted
Planned for
fubn
opendJons
Planned for
Iw.e
oparotions
Nolknown
Nolknown
None
None
NlA
NlA
EPA Method
314
EPA_
314
NlA
NlA
Pionned for future opendJons
Planned for futu'e operatOns
'. - • "/",,-
MonIDrtng- PA-3ll4, MW·
IMA
FortL_ WA 10 None GW
...
arotrd Impect NA Np Nol""l\lil9d 9/412002 1.3':MW03. EPA310i
04;MWQ8.15
NO 12 sampJes
..it ""',
Co_
h:
'< ~
I;: iii.
~\ t• •'li;,'i~<f
i'1\I_flMt ~~:;
,,$' :"'J;'il'~;l";;,
", "
IMA Fort Riley KS 1 UCMR GW _plant .....'" 2 Yes no! req_ 1=, 00115159 EPA 314 <4I>Pb (MRL = 4ppb)
'A"IlO2;
SW_ont
None· Row
21No1102,
IMA Fort LllOIl8rd Wood KS 1 UCMR SW 4 No no!req_ W_Big EPA 314 <4ppb (MRL = 4ppb)
plant lMer03;
PioeyRMlr
'JlI103
MoryloM FInisIlod Orinking _ sampled for Cly 01

Depa_of Aberd-.. W_.....,.,isGWemenothg
IMA A_PRMng GRlUld MIl 3 the ErMIonmont GW Frished water NA Yes 11/12J2002 EPA314-M <1 ppb from aquifer under APG baing field. APG.1'd
Advi9ofyle'llelWl ely e_e samplocalection. (S8mp1od by
finished water CIy)
MeryloM Fnished Or1nklng watersampled for ely 01

Depal1mont 01 A1>erdeen W_.....,.,IsGWemenothg
IMA Abenl.... PlOlIing Ground MD 3 the Environment GW Fonished_ NA Yes 11/1912002 EPA314-M e.61Jppb from aqwer under APG trB~ fiekI. APG am
Advisofylevelh Cly.Remote sample - . . (Sampled by
frished water Anny)
Page 1016
Summary of ARMY
_ _ Nams
EPA Regulatory
DW$ource SompIe .UCMR
"--'
AddItI....1 o.tB(.) Sampllnw
Pon:hI...... SamplIng
Prognm S_ (Surface ew CoIlocllon Rounds Sampling Dolo 01_ Sampling Sample ... AnoIJtI""r Ro·-(ppbr C()IIWMnts or Rwlferencee
RogIOII Drtver Cttecr
G_rl Loadlon" CompIoIod P DWSampling C~ ...
Marylond Finished Dmking water ..mpled for city 01
Department 01 Aberdeen. Water!i0UJ'C8 is GW emanati1g
IMA Aberdeen Proving Grotnt MIl 3 the Emironmenl GW Frished water HA Yes 11/2612llO2 EPA314-M 0.61J ppb from aquifer tn:I« APG 1Iaing f.eld. APG arJJ
Advisory kNeI in City alernate sample ooIedbn. (Sampled by
frished water City)
,
Marylond Finisholl DmkB1g w_.. mpled for City 01
-
Abefdeen. Wet.1!6 source Is GW eI'Tl8nati1g
City._
Department 01
IMA Aberdeen PloW1g Grotnl MD 3 theEIWironmenl GW F"tnishecfwater HA Yes 12I3l2OO2 EPA 314-M 0.76J ppb hom .quifer om« APG baing foold. APG.nd
AdvIsDty_in sample - . , . (Samplod by
CIy)
\
MBryIond F_ DmkB1g _ter ..mpled for City 01

Department 01 Aberdeen. Water SOl.Re is GW emanati1g
IMA Aberd_ Promg Ground MO 3 the EnWonrnert GW fnshedwater HA Yes 12/1G'2002 EPA314-M < 1 ppb hom aquifer tnterAPG baing flekI. APG and
Ad1llooly_in City .Ilernote sample _ . (Sampled by
frished water City)
Marylond F_ DmkB1g ....er ..mpled for City 01
-
Department 01 Aberdeen. Water""""" Is GW emanating
IMA Aberd_ ProWlg Grotnl MIl 3 the Environment GW Frished water HA Yes 12/17/2002 EPA314-M <1 ppb from aquler tRIer APG baing field. APG arJj
AdvIsDty_in CIy ..........mple _ . (Sampled by
Army)
MBryIond F_ DmkB1g _ter..mpled for Cly 01
-
Department 01 Aberdeen. Water soun:e is GW emel'll!6lg
IMA Aberd_ ProWlg Grotnl Me 3 the Environment
Ad1IIooly _ in GW FD1ished water HA Yes 12f2612l102 EPA 314-M 0.6OJ ppb from aquler tnterAPG Inling foold. APG end
Cly••emoIe sample - . . (Sampled by
Army)
Marylond F_ DmkB1g _ter..mpled few Cly 01

Depal1menl 01 Aberdeen. Water souroe is GW emenatirJjJ
IMA Aberd_ ProWlg Grotnl Me 3 the Environmert GW F"rished water HA Yes 12131/2002 EPA 314-M 0.61J ppb hom aquler tnler APG baing flekI. APG.nd
Advisory kNeI in Cly .Romat...mple _Ion. (Sampled by
frished water Chy)
Marylond _ DmkB1g ....er..mpled for City 01

Department 01 Aberdeen. Water SCU'C8 is GW eI'TlalllNlg
IMA A_ProWlg Grotnl Me 3 tha Environment
Ad1IIooly _ in GW Filished WIller HA Yes 11712003 EPA314-M < 1 ppb from aqufer tnler APG baing foold. APG.nd
CIy ........ sample coIadk>n. (Sampled by
~water Cly)
Marylond F_ DmkB1g _ ..mpled few Cly 01

Department 01 Aberdeen. Water SCU'C8 is GW em8nSq
_ Proving Grotnl Md'
IMA 3 the EnWonment GW F_ ....... HA Yes 1/1412003 EPA 314-M 0.59.1 ppb from aqufer tnler APG tnling flekI. APG end
Advisofy level in Cly domat...mple coIIeclIon. (Sampled by
frished water Army)
Marylond
Department 01
Finished DmkB1g w_.. mpled for Cly 01
Aberdeen. Water soun:e l:s GW emanating
IMA Aberd_ ProWlg Ground MIl 3 the Environment GW Finished water HA Yes 1/21/2003 EPA314-M 0.7OJ ppb hom aqufer under APG baing flekI. APG.nd
AdvIsDty_in City ..........mple _ . (Sampled by
fi'Iished wat« Army)
MBryIond Finished DmkB1g _ter ..mpIed for CIy 01

Department 01 Aberdeen. Water SCU'C8 is G'W tmanatrg
IMA Aberdeen Proving Grotnl MO 3 !he Environmtrt GW Filished_ HA Yes 1/2612003 EPA314-M < 1 ppb from squl« an:Ier APG trair9 fl8kl. APG and
AlMsory_in Chy ••ernat...mple collection. (Sampled by
frished wat« CIy)
Page 2 016
Summary of ARMY
Prognm
_ ....... ... EPA
RegIon
Regulatory
Drtver Cltecr
Maryland
DW-'"
(5urf_..
G_r)
Sample
CoIloclIon
LacoIIcln""
#UCIIR
Roundo
~
A_ ~
Sampling DotoolNoxt
Pie""" DWSompIlng
c_
Dato(o)
~ng
~ngI
SompIeRl# AnoIytIcaI
-....
Po_ 8amp!fnlf
Roo..... (ppb)·
Comments or RefenlnctNi
Finished Dmlmg woler oompled for Clyof

Ilepalfmenl 01 Aberdel!In. WaterlOUrC8 is GW emanating
IMA Aberd_ Proving Ground Me 3 the Environment OW Fi'"i:shed water NA Yes 2/412003 EPA314-M < 1 ppb from aqUfo...nler APO lnIing fiett. APO ond
Ad'"""Y ...... in Cily alemale sampte ooIection. (Sampled by
finished water CIy)
,
Mol)land _ Drinki1g wateroompled for Cly d
~_of
Fonlshed _ Aberdeen. Water8Ol.ll"08 is GW emar.mg
IMA Abon:Ieen Proving GI'OUtld Me 3 the Environment OW NA Yes 2/1112003 EPA 3f4-M D.86J ppb from aqufertnler APG lnIing footf. APe 00:1
._
Ad-.y_in CIy .Iemote somplo coIocti:m. (Sampled by
frished water Army)
Maryland
~_01
Detected at Iml 01 MOE """"""Y. (Sampled by
IMA Aberd_ P!<Mng Ground Me 3 ffIoEnvlrormerf OW HA Vas 2/11Il2OO3 EPA 314-1ol 1.Dppb
Army)
Ad""""Ylevelln
frished water
Maryland Finished Drinki1g weier sampled for CIy d

__ P!<Mng GItlUI'd ~_01 Aberdeen. Water _Is GW emonalilg
IMA MD 3 theEnWonmert OW Ftnished water HA Yes 212512003 EPA 314-M <1 ppb from aqufer.mer APG traing field. APG and
Ad-.ylevelln CIy.a...- oompla _ . (Sampled by
_water Army)
r-
Maryland Firished D~ _aompled for Cly of
-
~_01 Abetdeen. W_....... IsGW ....notmg
Fnishod _
IMA Aberdeen Pro...qa Grotn:I MD 3 theEnWonmert GW HA Vas 3/~ EPA314-M <1 ppb from sqIMer .....er APe lro&1g f"*!. APG.o:I
Achioorylevelln Clyalemoteoomplo_. (Sempled by
CIy)
Maryland Firished D~ WOleraompled for Clyof

Aberd..... W_ _ isGWemonalilg
Ilepalfmenl of
IMA Aberdeen PrtMng Ground MIl 3 the EnWonment OW Fnished Wllter NA Vas 3/1112003 EPA314-M D.39J ppb frem sqIMer under APGlnli'lg f"*!. APG.o:I
Ad-.y level In Cly .Iemote oompla _ . (Sampled by
finished water Army)
Mal}'land _ Drinki1g _ oompled for Cly of

0ep0f1ment of Aberdeen. Water source is GW emanating
IMA Aberdeen ProWig Ground MD 3 theE_ant GW Firished W8ter NA Yes 3/1812003 EPA 314-M D.5OJppb frem sqller tnler APG 1nIi'lg WI. APG and
Ad-.ylevelln CIy .Iornate oompla _ . (Sampled by
finished water Army)
IMA
_ PtovIng GRlUld
lID 3
Mol}'Iand
o-mnartof
theE_art
Advtsory IevBI n
OW
- NA Vas 3I25l2OO3 EPA314-M < 1 ppb
_ D~ WOleroompied for Cly of
Aberdeen. W_ _ IsGW~
from sqller .....er APG tnllilg f"*!. APe.o:I

CIy .Iemoteoompla _ . (Sampled by
__
tnshed water CIy)
Mal}'land
OeportmerOof
Firished Drtr*lngw_ oompled for Cly of
Aberdeen. WSfJ!Jr I()lICIB Is GW ernansting
IMA Aberd_ PrtMng GIOIn:I MD 3 the Emironmenl GW FInished_ NA Vas 41112003 EPA 314-M 0.8 ppb from ..uf. under APG trd1g fBt. APG an:l
Ad-.y level in CIy .I....to oompla _ . (Sampled by
City)
Mol}'Iand F_ Dmking_ aomplod for CIy of

OeportmerOof Aberdooo. W_"""""'IsGW ....mtIng
IMA Aberd_ PrtMng GIOIn:I MD 3 the EnWonmart OW Fi1ished water NA Yeo 4I8l2OO3 EPA 314-M D.34J ppb from sqller .....er APG tnling f"*!. APG.o:I
Ad""""Ylevelin ely ".m.te sompla coIocll:>ct. (Sompled by
frished water Army)
Page30f6
Summary of ARMY
Prognm ....1I8Uon ...me
_ _ Proving Ground
s_ EPA
RogIcn
Regulatary
O'-C_
Ma""'rd
DepaI1ment 01
DWSource
(Su.face 0<
G'-"
~
50......
LocotIon"'
-
,UCMR
COfAIlIeled
AddlIl....1
Sampling
PIIIrmod
~
o.tool_
OW Sampling
01118(.'
SamplIng
C...._
SamplfllD'
SompleIO' AneIytlc8I
Melhod
Parchlonlo 50mpllng
R...... (""")·
C~ntI or Referencea
Finished Orindng W8ler sampled for CIy of

Aberdeen. Water so~ is GW emanati1g
11M MO 3 Ihe ErMoonment GW Fl'IIshedwater NA V.,. 4/1512003 EPA 314-M 0.4OJ ppb lrom &qui... urder APG baiilg _. APG erd
Advi80ry level in ely stemattl sample oo8ection. (Semplod by
fl'1ishr!dWRter Anny)
Malj1erd Finished DrHOng ...... sempled lor CiIy of

Depa_of Abeod__ W_"""""isGW ......""'*'9
11M Aberdeen Proving Ground MO 3 lheErMonm'" GW FA9hed water NA V.,. 4I22l2OO3 EPA3140M <O.5ppb fromaq_urderAPGlJaiklg_. APG.rd
Advisoly_in CIy..........mpla _ . (Sampled by
_wat... CIy)
,
Malj1erd F_ _
FInished Dmking _ ..mpIed tor CiIy 01
-
Depariment 01 AbeRleen. Waf/K BOUre8 is GW M18mti1g
11M A_ PnMng Ground MO 3 lIle~ GW NA V.,. 4I2llI2OO3 EPA3140M <0.5 ppb from aqul... onl... APe tnring _. APe erd
AcMoo<y_in CIy._..mple _ . (Sampled by
CIy)
Ma!yland FInished DrH<ing _ ..mpled tor CIy 01

___ W.tar"""""IsGWama""'*'9
-
_ _ Pn>Wv Ground Department'"
11M MD 3 lINt Emiotxlment GN Fl'Iishedwater NA Ves 5/612003 EPA 3140M 0.45J ppb from aqul... urder APe IJaIing _. APG.rd
AcMsofyleWllin CIy......'.aamplacollecllon. (Sampled by
Amy)
Ma""'rd FInished DrHdng _ ..mpled b CIy 01
-
Dapartm... 01 Abeod_. W_.....,.isGWama""'*'9
11M Abeod_ PlOving Ground MO 3 lINt Emiotxlment GN Frished water NA Ves 5/1312003 EPA 314-M 0.48J ppb from aquI... urder APe baling _. APe.rd
AdVisay_in ely .'smale ..
Anny)
mple collection. (Sampled by
MarylBrd F_ DrH<ing _ ..mpled r... Cly 01

DapaIlment 01 Abeod__ W_.....,.isGWama""'*'9
11M -_Pn>Wv Ground MD 3 lINtE_ GW Finished water NA Ves 5/2012003 EPA314-M O.5ppb from aqul... onl... APe baling _. APG.rd
AdWlory_in Cly ......t...mple collection. (Sampled by
_wat... CiIy)
Ma""'rd _ Drttilg wat... _pled bClyof
-
~entof AbeRteen. Water~ is GW ernanaUng
11M A_ PIOving Ground Me 3 lINt ElNironment GW Finished_ NA V.. 5/ZT12OO3 EPA3140M < 0.4 ppb from aq_lRI.. APO baling foatl. APG.rd
Advisoly _ in
CiIy ..........mpIa-. (S.mpled by
CiIy)
MI!yIand Finished ~ _ ..mplod IorCIy 01

Dapartm"'01 Aberdeen. Water eoun::e Is GW ~
IM'I A_ PIOving Ground MD· 3 theE_ GW Finiohad_ NA Ves &'312003 EPA3140M < 0.4.1 ppb from aqui... urderAPG tnring _. APG.rd
AdWlory_in CiIy _ ...mple coIIacIion. (Sampled by
finished WIder anny)
Marylord Finiohad D!Hdng wat....mplad for CiIy 01

Department 01 F_ _ Aberdeen. WafJ!I!lOtRe is GW emansmg
IWI Abeod_ PnMng Ground MD 3 lINtE_ GW NA Ves 8/1MOO3 EPA 3140M 0.81J ppb from aqul.. onl.. APG baling foatl. APG.rd
AdWlory_in CiIy ._. semple coIIacIion. (Sampled by
finished water Anny)
Ma""rd _ Drinking wat.....mplad ror Cly 01

_ _. Welar.....,.IsGWamanating
Oapartment 01
IIoIA Aben:teen Proving GrotI1d MD 3 the EJMronmer1l GW Frishad_ NA V.. 8/1712003 EPA 314-M <O.5ppb from aq....et WIder APG tra-.g fieb. APG ard
Advisorylevetin Cily "amate ample coRection. (Sampled by
filishsd water City)
Page 4 016
Summary of ARMY
P"'fllllm _Nome
- EPA
RogIcn
RoguIalofy
DIt.... C_
ow_
(S"",,coor
Graundwator)
9lonpIo
C-'
L_~
_UCIIR
Rouods
C~
-- c_ ~
Sompftng lIotoal_
Planned lJW S8mplIng
Dato(ll)
S8mplIng
s..rq,IIngI
SompIo I)_ Analyllcol
IIolhod
P..._ SompIlng
Raoulta (ppb)0 C_orR_
IMA Aberdeen PI1lWlg Ground MD 3

Maryland
Dope_of
IhoE_...
Advisoryle\lel in
finished water
Maryland
GW
- NA Ves 612412003 EPA 314-M < 0.5 ppb

Fnshed Dri1king water sample:t for City d
Aberdeen. Water source Is GW emanating
from aqutfer uncJer APG tJaiing field. APG ani
Cily demot. samplo _.(SompIelI by
CIly)
F1nishod D.m.g _ oomplo:l for Cly of

Dope....... of F_ _ Aberdeen. Wat. SCU'Ce Is GW em8~
11M Abef'deen Proving Gromd MD 3 the Environmert GW NA Ves 71112003 EPA314-M 0.30.1 ppb from aqul_ lind... APG baing _. APG.nd
f_ _
Adviloly_1n Cilyalomet. sample - . (Samplo:l by
Army)
\
IMA AbenI.... ProWg Groood MIl 3

--
MaryloRl
Dopoo1m"''
-
lito EnvironmOlt
AdvI9oIy_1n
GW NA V.. 71812003 EPA314-M 0.57 J ppb
Finished D'""'"'s- samplo:llor Cily '"
Aberdeen. Watersouree is GW EUtanlItIng
fromaquJ_und«<,PGbaingflOld. APGand
CIly altemate somple~. (Samplo:l by
CIly)
Maryland F-.odIlrinklng_samplo:lfa<Cllyof
-
Depo........ 01 Abonleon. Watef_ is GW emanating
11M AbenI_ ProWg Ground MIl 3 lito Environment GW Filished water NA Ves 7/1512003 EPA 314-M <0.5 ppI:l hom aqUl_ lind« APG baing _. APG and
Advisaly_1n CIly ••emote somple collodion. (Samplo:l by
CIy)
Maryland Finished DmkIng _ samplo:l fa< Clly of

F_ _
Dope""'" of Aberdeen. Wst«souree Is GW em.,.mg
IMA Abooleon ProW'll GICIDl MIl 3 lito Environment GW NA V.. 7122J2OO3 EPA 314-M <0.5 ppb from aqufer 1JI"I:ler APG baing field. APG ani
AdvisaIy_ln CIly a_e somple _.(Sampled by
frished watEl' elly)
Maryland . _DmkIng _ samplo:l forCIy of

Depor1m... of F_ _ Aberdeen. Weter sot.r'Ce ts GW ~
11M AbooI_ProWgGromd MIl 3 theE_ GW NA Ves 7129f2O(J3 EPA314-M O.50J ppb from aqul_ lind...APG baing _. APG and
AdvisaIy_1n Clyalomatesample collodion. (Samplo:l by
fi"ished water Anny)
Maryland Finished DmkIng _ aamplo:l fa<CIly of

_ _ p~Ground Deporfmenl 01 Aberdeen. Wat« SOI.I'C8Is GW emar8ting
11M MIl 3 theE_ GW FOshed water NA Ves 81512003 EPA314-M 0.54J ppb hom aquf_ lind« APG baing field. APG and
AdvisaIy_ln CIly oIemot. sample coledbn (Samplo:l by
1InIshod_"" Anny)
r-
11M A_P~Gro<nI lIe/ . 3

Maryland
Depor1m....'"
Iho Envlronmenl
AdvisaIy_1n
1InIshod_
Maryland
GW
- NA Ves 811412003 EPA 314-M 0.4OJ ppb
Friohod DmkIng -.. aamplo:l fa<CIly of
_ . Watef_isGW ....nat09
hom aqlif_IInd«APGtJaing_. APGand
CIlya_samplo-' (Samplo:l by
Anny)
FinIshed DmkIng _ samplo:l fa< City of

Depol1mOltof ' _ _tor Aberdeen. WafJ!I!iIOlme ts GW emanating
IMA Aberdeen Proving GrolI1d MIl 3 Iho Environm... GW NA Ves 8I1Q'2003 EPA 314-101 0.34 J ppb fromaquf«u-derAPGlI8ingfield. APGand
Advisaly_ln CIly a_e oomple co1leclion. (Samplo:l by
frishad water Anny)
_ DmkIng _ aampIo:l for Cly 01

Maryla'"
Oopo....... of A_. Wat.......... !sGW .... notIng
IMA Aberdeon Poomg GIO'Rl MD 3 the Environment. GW Flnished_ NA Ves 8/26/2003 EPA 314-M 0.5OJ ppb from aquf_ Inl... APG baing field. APG and
A<Moory_"
IInIshodwatet
CIly a_esample coIIedion. (Samplo:l by
Anny)
Page 5016
Summary of ARMY
Program
,. .
--- -
EPA
RegIon
~
D.-CIt8d"
MaI)lBrd
DWSouroe
(S.."... ..
~
Somple
C-.
L_.....
'UCUR
R_
Completsd
_ I
Expoc:led DollI(s}
Plsnnod DWSsmpIIng C<JnducIod

SsmpIlng/
sampling Dalllof_ 8ampIing SsmpIeIl' AhsIytIcol
-....
P_BsmpIlng
-(ppbl'
Cornrr-ItI or Rete......
F.- Drinking water ..mpled for Cly of
--
Department of AbeItIeen. W_ soun:e Is GW....na&1g
AberdMl\Proving Ground MO 3 theElNironmenl GW FIlished water NA Yes 9l1li2003 EPA 314-M <O.50ppb from aqu(er under APG baing fiett. APG IlI1d
A<Msory_1n CIIy 01...- ..mple coIaclion. (Sampled by
CIIy)
Malylard F_ DnA1g _ ..mpIed for ely of
--
Depa_of Aberdeen. Water source is GW emanatilg
IMA Abenleon ProvIng Ground MD 3 Iha~ GW FriIhed_ NA Yes 9/16'2003 EPA314-M NO fn>m,.p... uncfsr APG 1nl-.g fiotI. APG Ilfd
Advisory_In elys_. aemple _ . (Sampled by
ely)
\
I.... AbenleenPnMnQ Ground MD 3

Malylard
Department of
theE_
A<Msory_1n
fnished water
GW
-- NA Yes 9/24'2003 EPA314-M NO
_ OJirl<klg wat.....mpled for ely of
Aberdeen. Water M;lUl:Ie b OW emanllling
fn>m aqufsr unci... APG tnI-.g fiotI. APG Ilfd
CIy._aemple_ (Sampled by
CIIy)
MaIyIard F_ _ Firiohed DnA1g wat.....mpled for Cly of

_ _ Proving GRlUld Department of Abenleen. W_...... IsGW ....na&1g
I.... MD 3 theErMonmert GW NA Yes 10I9l2OO3 EPA 3,.......
O.3llJppb fn>m aqufsr Inter APG baing fiotI. APG .....
Advisory_In CIIy s_ sample coIaclion. ( _ by
-_
_ DnA1g _ _ for CIIy of
MaI)1srd F_ _
Depa"'-'lof
_ .... W_......IsGW ....na&1g
I.... _ProWlg Ground MD 3 the ErMonmert GW NA Yes 1011412003 EPA314-M 0.5OJ ppb fn>m aqufsr"- APG 1nl1og r....
APG ord
AcMIory_1n CIy_aemple_. (Sampled by
.. Anny)
Malylard _ Drinking wst... sampled for ely of
--
A__ ProWlg Ground Oeplutment of Aberdeen. Water$OUl"C8bGW 8rnanll1lr1t
IMA MD 3 theE_ GW Fnsf1ed water NA Yes 1012112003 EPA314-M 0.37J ppb from aq..... Inter APG baing r.... APG ord
AcMIory_1n ely .1"'- umple coIaclion. (Sampled by
Army)
Malylard FInIshad Drinking ....... aempled for Cly of
__ Proving GRlUld theE_

Depa_of _ Abord8ln. Water eouce b C;W erne_ling
I"" MD 3 GW Ri:!lhed water NA Yes 11103 Ill12812OO3 EPA314-M 0.21Jppb fn>m .... Inter APG 1nl1og fiotI. APG srd
AcMIory_1n CIIy _ ..mple ooIIecIlon. (Sampled by
. 'J' .. 8 laboratory data qUBlliBr thlIt cfenotes an estimated vatue.
Page 6 016
-
Enclosure 2
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
l1lgal Basis for Average

NPOES
Sampling/
Sample Results
EPA Including Sampling
Permit limit or
Sample Collection
Sampling
Program InstaDatlon Name Slate Pennlt 1# and
Analytical
(ppb) range last Comments on Sampling Requirement
Region Prechlorate In Frequency
Requirement
Location
Results (ppb)
Type
Method
12 months
the PennIt ~st 12 months
TPDESpermi Perchlorate added to TPDES because perchlorate

SUlface water discharge
-Storm
4 times from High Explosive
was discoved at neighboring installation. RRAD. n
Lone Star Army Wats; perchlorate is liSCovered at LSAAP state v.1JI •
AMC-JMC TX 6 TPDES during storm 4ppb Demolition Ground and 314.0/4ppb NO NO
AmmunltionPlanl #102263 require SlAlmiIion of a Pollution Prevention Plan
water events High ExplOsive Burning
issued for the Control of Perchlorate within 180 days after
Ground
12/16102 detection.
StormWats.
ARNG Camp Navajo AZ 8 982347 l/monlh 10ppb effluent 314.0/4ppb 0.9 to 39 ppb 3ppb
NPDES
Stale requires submition of a Pollution Prevention

Plan for the Control of PerchlOrate within 180days
TPDES after detection. Nole: US Army plaming missile
TPDES.Storm
Notice of storm water rumoff at 4
IMAISWRO Red River Army Depot TX 6 PermiI# Qb1y 314.0/4 ppb ND-l54 ppb 35.7 ppb motor propellant lPind-out facility at RRAD. \\flich
Water P2 Plan
detection sites in the OBIOD area
02206 could largely replace the open burning
demilitarization requirement for some missile
systems.
Page 1 of1
2
PAGES
REMOVED
/4/5
-
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
ASSISTANT CHIEF OF STAFF FOR INSTALLATION MANAGEMENT
800 ARMY PENTAGON
WASHINGTON. DC 20310.Q600
DAIM-ZA JUN 272003
MEMORANDUM FOR SEE DISTRIBUTION

.
SUBJECT: Department of Army Guidance for Addressing Potential Perchlorate
Contamination
1. Reference. Memorandum from Assistant Under Secretary of Defense

(Environment), Perchlorate Assessment Policy. November .13, 2002 (Enclosure 1).
2. This memorandum provides Department of the Army guidance to implement the

Department of Defense (000) perchlorate assessment policy (Reference) in situations
where no legally mandated requirement exists, to report and track data, and to assist in
determining the potential presence and risks from perchlorates.
3. No Federal regulatory standards (i.e., discharge standards or maximum contaminant

level under the Clean Water Act, Safe Drinking Water Act, Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act or Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act) have been established for perchlorate, and only a few states have
adopted perchlorate action levels. However, perchlorate is on track for future regulatory
action at both the national and state levels. Garrison Commanders, BRAC Field Office
Directors and FUDS District Commanders are being asked by Federal and state
regulators to sample and assess for the presence of perchlorate on, or emanating from,
their facilities.
4. The Department of the Army guidance (Enclosure 2) provides instructions for

implementing the 000 policy. The intent of this guidance is to provide the Army with a
consistent framework for addressing potential perchlorate contamination resulting from
ongoing activities, as well as past practices. It also provides instructions for reporting of
data to HQDA. This guidance applies to all active installations, BRAC Army installations
and excess properties, and Formerly Used Defense Sites located within the United
States and its territories.
DAIM-ZA
Contamination
5. Points of contact are Ms. Connie Van Brocklin, 703-693-0546,

connie.vanbrocklin@hqda.army.mil and Mr. Malcolm Garg, 703-693-0678,·
malcom.garg@hqda.army.mil.
2 Encls
~R ~:'''I'F>1ofC /UI.J~3
Majo eneral, GS
Assistant Chief of Staff
for Installation Management
DISTRIBUTION:
DIRECTOR, US ARMY INSTALLATION MANAGEMENT AGENCY, AnN: MR.

CARLISLE, 2511 JEFFERSON DAVIS HIGHWAY (TAYLOR BUILDING),
ARLINGTON, VA 22202
COMMANDER, US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, AnN: CECS/CELD-ZE, 441 G
STREET, NW, WASHINGTON, DC 20314-1000
CHIEF, NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU, ATTN: NGB-ARZ-D/NGB-ARE, ARLINGTON
HALL, 111 SOUTH GEORGE MASON DRIVE, ARLINGTON, VA 22204-1382
CF:
COMMANDER,
US ARMY FORCES COMMAND, AnN: AFCS, FT MCPHERSON GA 30330-6000
US ARMY MATERIEL COMMAND, AnN: AMCCS/AMCEN-A, 5001 EISENHOWER
AVENUE, ALEXANDRIA VA 22333-0001
US ARMY TRAINING AND DOCTRINE COMMAND, AnN: ATCS, FT MONROE VA
23651-5000
US ARMY MEDICAL COMMAND, AnN: MCCS, 2050 WORTH ROAD, Ft SAM
HOUSTON TX 78234-6000
US ARMY MILITARY DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, AnN: ANCS/ANSP, FT LESLEY
J. MCNAIR, WASHINGTON DC 20319-5050
US ARMY PACIFIC, ATTN: APCS/APEN-EV, FT SHAFTER, HI 96858-5100
US ARMY SOUTH, ATTN: SOCS/SOEN, P.O. BOX 34000, FORT BUCHANAN,
PUERTO RICO 00934-3400
US ARMY RESERVE COMMAND, AnN: AFRC-CS, 1401 DESHLER STREET, SW,
FT MCPHERSON GA 30330-2000
US ARMY SPACE AND STRATEGIC DEFENSE COMMAND, AnN: CSSD-ZC/CSSD
EN, PO BOX 1500, HUNTSVILLE AL 35807-3801
2
.-._.~----------------
....
DAIM-ZA
Contamination
MILITARY TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT COMMAND, ATTN: MTEA-CS/MTEA-FE,

HOFFMAN BLDG 11,200 STOVAL STREET, ALEXANDRIA VA 22332-5000US
ARMY CENTER FOR HEALTH PROMOTION AND PREVENTATIVEMEDICINE, ATTN:
MCHB-CS/MCHB-DC-EHM, ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND, MD 21010-5422
US ARMY SIGNAL COMMAND, ATTN: ASCS/ASEN, FT HUACHUCA, AZ 85613-5000
US ARMY TEST AND EVALUTATION COMMAND, ATTN: CSTE-ILE, 4501 FORD

AVENUE, ALEXANDRIA, VA 22302-1458
SUPERINTENDENT, US MILITARY ACADEMY, ATTN: MACS/MAEN, WEST POINT,
NY 10996-1592
DEPUTY ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE ARMY (ENVIRONMENT, SAFETY AND
OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH)
IMA REGIONAL OFFICES:

INSTALLATION MANAGEM-ENT AGENCY, NORTHEAST REGION, SFIM-NE,
(DEBORAH RICHERT), 5A NORTH GATE ROAD, FORT MONROE, VA 23651
1048
INSTALLATION MANAGEMENT AGENCY, SOUTHEAST REGION, SFIM-SE, (RUDY
STINE), 1593 HARDEE AVENUE, SW, BUILDING 171, FORT MCPHERSON, GA
30330-1057
INSTALLATION MANAGEMENT AGENCY, NORTHWEST REGION, SFIM-NW, (GARY
BALTRAM), 1 ROCK ISLAND ARSENAL, ROCK ISLAND, IL 61299
INSTALLATION MANAGEMENT AGENCY, SOUTHWEST REGION, SFIM-SW,
(DAMON CARDENAS), 1204 STANLEY ROAD, SUITE 9, FORT SAM HOUSTON,
TX 78234-5009
INSTALLATION MANAGEMENT AGENCY, PACIFIC REGION, SFIM-PA, (MIKE
HARADA), FT SHAFTER, HI 96858-5000
DAIM-EDT
DAIM-BO
DAMO-TRS
DALO-SMA
ENVIRONMENTAL LAW DIVISION, OFFICE OF THE JUDGE ADVOCATE GENERAL,
JALS-EL
SFIM-AEC
OFFICE OF THE UNDER SECRETARY OF DEF NSE

3000 DEFENSE PENTAGON
WASHINGTON, DC 20301·3000
NOV. 13m
ACQUIIIITION,
TECHNOI-OOY
AND LOGISTICS
MEMORANDUM FOR DEPUTY ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF HE ARMY

(ENVIRONMENf,SAFETY ANDOC UPATIONAL
HEALTH)
DEPUTY ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF HE NAVY
(ENVIRONMENT)
DEPUTY ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF HE AIR FORCE
(ENVIRONMENT. SAFETY AND OCCUPATIONAL
HEALTH)
DIREcrOR. SUPPORT SERVICES. DEFENSE LOOISTICS
AGENCY
SUBJECT: Perchlorate Assessment Policy
DoD Components may ascertain and assess for perchlorate if there is a reasonable
basis to suspect both ,3 potential presence of perchlorate and a pathway on their
installations where it could threaten public health.
000 Components can use environmental restoration funding only forsite~ that
meet Defense Environmental Restoration Program (DERP) eligibility requirements in the
current version of the DERP management guidance. At other sites, this memorandum
t::ilublbht::i DoD policy Lo allow Components to consider this a Class II requirement
under 000 Instruction 4715.6 "Environmental Compliance",
Please provide the following information for those installations that conduct
sampling and find perchlorate: 1) Installation, 2) Level found and 3) Where the
perchlorote was found,
My point of contact is, Mr. Shah A. Choudhury. (703) 697-7475 for DERP and Ms.
Maureen SulJivan, (703) 604-0519, for all other matters.
{}rL.~tv~. ~
/~ohn {'aul Woodley, Jr. 7--
Assistant Deputy Under Secretary
of Defense (Environment)
Department of Army Guidance for Addressing Potential Perchlorate Contamination
June 2003
1. This gUidance implements and supplements the 000 Perchlorate Assessment

Policy issued 13 Nov 02. The purpose of this guidance is to provide the Army with a
consistent framework for addressing potential perchlorate contamination resulting from
ongoing activities as well as past practices. This guidance applies to Army active and
BRAC installations and Formerly Used Defense Sites (FLlDS) located within the United
States. For the purpose of this guidance, those locations will be referred to as "defense
sites".
2. This guidance outlines:
a. Intemal Army requirements for ascertaining potential perchlorate contamination

resulting from 000 activities .at all defense sites.
b. Guidelines for determining the existence of a potential human-health exposure

pathway.
-
c. Guidelines for conducting sampling, where justified, prior to promulgation of a .
federal health-based standard.
d. Guidelines for reporting data to HQDA.
3. The Army will adhere to, and comply with, any federal legal requirement to sample,
assess, or otherwise respond to suspected perchlorate contamination. The Army will
also adhere to and comply with any state legal requirement to sample, assess, or
otherwise respond to suspected perchlorate contamination to the extent that Congress
has clearly and unambiguously authorized a waiver of sovereign immunity for this
purpose. The Garrison Commander for active installations, BRAC Field Office Director
for BRAC/excess properties, or the USACE District Commander for FUDS property will
determine, in consultation with I~al counsel, if any federal, state or local statutes and/or
regulations are applicable to the defense site. Any perchlorate sampling or response
required by federal, state, or local laws and regulations should be implemented, to the
extent possible, consistent with the guidance below, to include the reporting of data.
4. In the absence of an applicable legal driver, Army may respond to possible

perchlorate contamination if all the following conditions are satisfied:
a. A reasonable basis exists to suspect a potential release of perchlorate that is

associated with DoD activities at the defense site;
b. A pathway exists for the potential contamination to threaten public health;
c. Authorization is received from HQDA,IDAIM-ED (ODEP), HQDA,IDAIM-BO

(BRACO), or HQUSACE (CEMP-R) by using the USACE FUDS program management
chain of command.
5. Determining the potential for perchlorate contamination: Installations may have the
potential for perchlorate contamination if the installation has a history of perchlorate use.
This includes the manufacture of missiles, rockets and/or munitions containing
perchlorates; using perchlorate-containing munitions for training or testing purposes;
demilitarizing perchlorate-containing munitions, such as performing "hog-out" of rockets
and missiles containing solid propellant, or conducting open bum/open detonation
(OB/OD) operations; and other operations where the likelihood of a perchlorate release
exists. Information on munitions containing perchlorate will be made available on DENIX
during summer 2003. To the extent possible, information should be gleaned on the
perchlorate related activity, intensity of activity and likelihood of a perchlorate release.
The Garrison Commander, BRAC Field Office Director or USACE District Commander
for FUDS is responsible for determining current and historical uses of perchlorate
related actiVities for installation and tenant activities.
6. Determining Potential Pathways for Perchlorate Presence: The public may

encounter perchlorate contamination in the environment through exposure to
groundwater, surface water, soil. or sediment. Perchlorate may reach human receptors
via several pathways. To determine whether a pathway exists, defense sites will:
a. Determine if there is any drinking water source that may be impacted by

groundwater or surface water on or leaving the defense site.
b. Determine if any drinking water systems on or near the defense site are listed in
the EPA UnregUlated Contaminants database and determine if the drinking water
system has sampled for or detected perchlorate. EPA Unregulated Contaminants
database link: http://www.epa.gov/ogwdwOOO/datalucmrgetdata.html
c. Determine through record searches if any soil or sediment potentially

contaminated with perchlorate is being used for fill material, topsoil, or other uses that
may threaten pUblic health.
d. Review existing documentation of environmental and/or hydrogeological

investigations performed at the defense site.
e. Work with regulators and the pUblic, as appropriate, to identify potential

exposure scenarios and pathways.
7. Conflict Resolution: Should the public or regulator disagree with the Army about
potential perchlorate contamination and/or possible exposure routes, the issue will be
elevated for resolution to HQDAlODEP for active installations, HQDAlBRACO for
BRAC/excess installations, or to HQUSACE for FUDS, for resolution. HQDA BRACO

decisions regarding BRAC/excess sites and HQUSACE decisions regarding FUDS sites
will be coordinated with HQDAlODEP to ensure that a consistent Army position is
maintained.
8. Public Affairs: All communication with the public and/or the media regarding
potential or confirmed perchlorate contamination will be reviewed and approved prior to
release by the Army pUblic affairs entity responsible for the defense site(s) in question.
The responsible public affairs entity will copy/furnish the Army public affairs POC for
perchlorate, Robert DiMichele, 410-436-1651, robert.dimichele@aec.apgea.army.mil.
9. Final Authorization:
a. Perchlorate Sampling Approval and Authorization: All requests for perchlorate

sampling at active installations shall be made in writing to HQDA, DAIM-ED (ODEP),
through HQ IMA, by the installation's Garrison Commander. Army National Guard
(ARNG) sites will forward their request to the National Guard Bureau Environmental
Programs Division (NGB-ARE) who in tum will coordinate the request with ODEP. For
BRAC/excess installations, the BRAC Field Office Director will make a written request to
HQDA DAIM-BO (BRACO). The written requests shall provide a detailed account of
why sampling is necessary, as outlined above. For FUDS, coordination and
authorization from HQUSACE (CEMP-R) may be obtained informally via e-mail through
the USACE FUDS program management chain of command. HQDAlBRACO and the
USACE FUDS chain of command decisions regarding BRAC/excess installations and
FUDS will be coordinated with HQDAlODEP to ensure consistent Army responses and
intent.
b. Responses: If regulators are requiring further response action to address

perchlorate, defense sites must receive approval for such action, as outlined above.
10. If a defense site determines sampling is required, then the following must occur:
a. For active or BRAC/excess installations a written plan will be developed. For

FUDS a plan coordinated through the FUDS management chain will be developed. The
plan will include:
(1) Reasons for suspecting the perchlorate contamination.
(2) Potential human-health receptors and pathways leading to them.
(3) Sampling locations and rationales.
(4) Analytical method to be used for sample analysis.
b. Laboratory Analysis: The laboratory must analyze for perchlorate using an

appropriate analytical method, EPA Method 314.0; EPA Method 9058; or an equivalent
method. All method Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QAlQC) requirements must be
met. The laboratory will have a quality system that meets the requirements of the
International Organization for Standardization (ISO) Standard 17025. The laboratory
will comply with the 000 Quality Systems Manual for Environmental Laboratories. The
method detection limit (MOL) must be lower than the reporting limit. The reporting limit
must be at or below the lowest action level. The reporting level cannot be lower than
the lowest standard of the calibration curve. The laboratory must be accredited in the
National Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (NELAP) and/or approved by
the Army Corps of Engineers.
c. If Regulators sample: If the regulating agency is conducting the sampling. the

defense site will collect and analyze split-samples in accordance with the protocols
outlined in subparagraph b. Additionally, the appropriate chain of command will be
notified. Actions wll be coordinated with HQDAlODEP prior to sampling.
d. Review of Plan: All pl~ns must be coordinated with U.S. Army Environmental
Law Division (ELD) prior to implementation with the exception of FUDS. For FUDS,
plans will be coordinated with the USACE Hazardous, Toxic and Radioactive Waste
Center of Expertise (HTRW-CX).
9. Reporting: Results of preVious and current perchlorate sampling must be provided to

the US Army Environmental Center (AEC) to:
Tony Perry
Bldg. 4480
Aberdeen Proving Ground
Edgewood. MD 21010
E-mail: tmerry@aec.apgea.army.mil
Phone: (410) 436-1605. DSN: 581-1605
The following information shall be proVided:
• Defense Site name

• Date sampled
• Location of sample
o At a minimum a description that would allow re-identification of the
sampling point.
o If available latitudellongitude coordinates detailing a sample location.
• Level found/analytical method
• Activity associated with sample location (Le., OB/OO, production facility, etc.)
• Point of Contact (POC)
Note: Specifically state if the sample was obtained from an operational training
range and/or there is cause to believe a detection is the result of current training
activities. If contamination is found on an operational training range or suspected to
be the result of current training activities, AEC will immediately notify HQDAlODEP
who in turn will notify DAMO-TRS (G-3).
11. Installation and' FLlDS environmental staffs are encouraged to contact and
coordinate with the following Army POCs for Perchlorate Issues.
• Office of the Director of Environmental Programs (ODEP) - Connie Van

Brocklin, Training Support Division, 703-693-0546,
connie.vanbrocklin@hgda.army.mil. Shawn Holsinger, Cleanup, 757-788
3045, shawn.holsinger@monroe.army.mil. Malcolm Garg, Training and
Support Division, 703-693-0678, malcom.garg@hgda.army.mil.
• Base Realignment and Closure Office (BRACO) - Ricky Stauber, 703-697
0130, ricky.stauber@hqda.army.miJ.
• US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) - J.R. Gibson, 202-761-4709,
james.r.gibson@usace.army.mil.
• Army National Guard (ARNG) - Michael Ahn, 703-607-7995,
Michael.Ahn@ngb.army.mil.
• Army Environmental Center (AEC) - Michael Dette, 410-436-1626,

michael.dette@aec.apgea.army.mil.
• Environmental Law Division (ELD) - Captain Lucy Murfitt, 703-696-1593,
lucy.murfitt@hgda.arrnv.mil.
• Installation Management Agency (IMA) - Jewel Simmons, 703-602-4241,
jewel.simmons@hgda.army.mil.
• Defense Ammunition Center (DAC) - Ed Ansell, 918-420-8081,
eddie.ansell@dac.army.mil. Aaron Williams, 918-420-8605,
aaron.wjlliams@dac.arrnv.mil.
• Public Affairs Office (PAO) - Robert DiMichele, 410-436-1651,
robert.dimichele@aec.apgea.army.mil
12. This guidance is effective until promulgation of a federal regulatory standard, or

until HQDA receives further gUidance from the Office of the Secretary of Defense,
whichever occurs first. .
1001
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Re: FW: News Clippings - April 8, 2004
..
Subject:
Aprll8-04.pdf
Kurt
Just talked with Rl staff
Bob Mullennix bas bis O\1n perceptione of what happened at the lJIlIIeting.
I have been at the MMRwIR'l' public meetings, 80 it is not surprising that
different individuals take away different i~ression8 as to what
happened.
EP.A Rlis taking a position not to reply in the press to op-ed pieces
like these whether they come from the pro or anti - lllPA (or 000)
individuals or groups.
There are 4'dditional news· clippings/stories in the CCT that convey the
situation at the NW corner, 10Ihich whf)I1 I get from Rl, I will forward.
Tbere are queations about the validity of the Army study undertaken,
both from EP.A and Mass DEP. Comments, concerns, etc. have been
conveyed to the Army. What EPA has said is that the fireworks may be
ODe of mult.:Lple sources of perchlorllte contandnation present. Where I
think we disa.greG with the AnIY report is that we do not believe, at
this time, that anyone can conclude that the fireWQrko are the only or
primary source of perchlora.te discovered in the NW corner properties.
Personally, not hav.:Lng seen the Army report, I don't believe one report
following the fireworks event can definitively establish this. As I
understand it, additional satnpling plans are under review Which will
help eveqon~ understand the actual sources around there -once they are
conducted.
Bottom line is that our Rl folks belieVe it is pre-mature at this time
to establish any conclusions about the sources of perchlorate and their
relative contributions to what is being found in the QW in this area of
Borne. Additional sampling will help Bort this out.
James Woolford
Direct Line
Office Line
Fax Lino
-Kratz, Kurt, ,
1
OSD-ATL" To: James
Woolford/DC/USE~A/US@EPA
<Kurt.Kratz@osd.m cc:
il> Subject: FW: News

Clippings - April 8, 2004
04/08/2004 02:40
PM
Jim,
What is the EPA side to this?
Kurt
-----Original Message----
From: Bogus, Holly E Ms [mailto:Holly.Bogus@MA.ngb.arrny.mil]
Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2004 2:15 PM
To: Amy Lipkind (E-mail); Hinkle Gary CIV ANG/CEC; Art Hatfield
(E-mail) ; .
COL Oliver Mason (E-mail); Col Per Korslund (E-mail); Jacobson, David
Mr;
Dennis Jasinski (E-mail); Elizabeth Higgins (E-mail); 'Elizabeth Mason'
(E-mail); Ellie Grillo (E-mail); Gary Moran (E-mail); Keefe, George W
MG;
HQAFCEE Leighton (E-mail); Jan Larkin (E-mail); Kelly, John P Mr; Justin
Mierz (E-mail); Kathy Hess (E-mail); Kevin Hood (E-mail); Marek Kevin
CIV
ANG/CEVP; Kurt Kratz (E-mail); Laurence SAF/GCN Groner (E-mail); Louise
House (E-mail); Howard, Michele Ms; MMR Karson (E-mail); Paul Legendre
(E-mail); Paul Marchessault (E-mail); Marroquin, Raul Mr ACSIM; Raymond
Kutzman (E-mail); Robert Lim (E-mail); Hartmann, Sally A Ms; Sarah
Levinson
(E-mail); Travis McCoun (E-mail); Wells Hunt (E-mail); William Klein
(E-mail)
Subject: News Clippings - April 8, 2004
4/8/2004 1 Cape Cod Times L EPA
IS Doing The Obvious At
MMR
Key
E=Editorial
I=Internet
L=Letter to editor
M=Meeting Notice
N=Newspaper story
O=other source
P=Picture
CI=Community
involvement
PR~Press release
2
«AprilB-04.pdf»
(See attached file: Apri18-04.pdf)
3
MvVIEW
EPA is dodging the obvious at :V1MR
Fireworks contain
perchlorate. It doesn't
take a rocket scientis~ to
fJgUre this one out.
...
3
PAGES
REMOVED
JDO 9
OFFICE OF THE UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE

WASHINGTON, DC 20301-3000
ACQUISITION.
TECHNOLOGY
AND LOGISTICS
JAN 1 t 2004
Mr. Michael O. Leavitt
Administrator
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
1200 PennsyJvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20460
Dear Mr. Leavitt:
In its report accompanying the Fiscal Year 2004 Defense Appropriations Act, the
House Appropriations Committee directed the Department of Defense and the
Environmental Protection Agency to conduct a joint study of perchlorate groundwater
contamination in and around the Colorado River, San Bernardino County, the Cochella
Valley, Santa Clara River, and the Imperial Valley. Further, the Committee directed the
submission of a report, within 180 days of enactment of the Appropriations Act, defining
the breadth and scope of contamination, preliminary recommendations regarding
establishment of a national drinking water standard, and appropriate steps related to
mitigation or cleanup (enclosed).
My point of contact for the study and the report is[ - - -- l

_ __ '0 meet the deadlines established in the Committee's report, I
request you designate a representative to work with Lieutenant Colonel Cornell, to
structure an approach to meet the Committee's requirements.
Sincerely,
~A-~
Alex A. Beehler
Assistant Deputy Under Secretary of Defense
(Environment, Safety and Occupational Health)
Enclosures:
As stated
108TH CONGRESS }
1st Session HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES { REPORT
108-187
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
APPROPRIATIONS BILL, 2004
REPORT
OF THE
~COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
TOGETHER WITH
ADDITIONAL VIEWS
[TO ACCOMPANY H.ll. 2658)
JULY 2, 200a.-Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the

State of the Union and ordered to be printed
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

88~78 WASHINOTON : 2003
96
ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, NAVY
Fiscal year 2003 appropriation $256,948,000
Fiscal r.ear 2004 bWiget request 256,153,000
Comnuttee recommendation 256,153,000
Change from budget request .. ..
The Committee recommends an appropriation of $256,153,000 for
Environmental Restoration, Navy. The recommendation is a de
crease of $795,000 from the amount appropriated in fiscal year
2003.
ISLAND OF VIEQUES
The Committee expects the Navy to provide sufficient levels of
funding to meet the Navy's commitment to undertake environ
mental remediation on the island of Vieques.
ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, AIR FORCE
Fiscal rear 2004 budget request 884;307,000
Comnuttee recoJl1mendation 38(,307,000
Change frozn budget request . .
Environmental Restoration, Air Force. The recommendation is a
decrease of $5,466,000 from the amount appropriated in fiscal year
2003.
ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, DEFENSE-WIDE
Fiscal year 2004 budget request 24,081,OQO
CommIttee recommendation 24,081,000
Change from budget request . ..
Environmental Restoration, Defense-Wide. The recommendation is
an increase of $583,000 from the amount appropriated in fiscal
year 2003.
ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, FORMERLY USED
DEFENSE SITES
Fiscal year 2003 appropriation .. $246,102,000

Fiscal year 2004 bud~ request . 212,619,000
Committee recommendation . 221,369,000
Change from budget request .. +8,750,000
The adjustments to the budget for Environmental Restoration,
Formerly Used Defense Sites are shown below: .
lID 1b.......dI of dollanJ
29150 Envlronmental Study of Former NIKE Missile Site . $250
29150 Davld's Island Fort Slocum Remediation . 2,500
29150 Fibers Clean-up Front Royal .. 6,000
PERCHLORATE GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION STUDY
Perchlorate is a salt, commonly used in a host of commercial and
military applications ranging from rocket fuels and fireworks -to
automobile airbags. High levels of perchlorate are known to inter
fere with thyroid gland and mental acuity functions and with the
97
human body's ability to produce growth and fetal development hor
mones. Though much is known about perchlorate, the specific long
term effects and the specific dosage levels at which perchlorate be
comes hazardous are still being debated in the environmental, sci
entific and medical communities. In Southern California, growing
groundwaterj)erchlorate contamination is widely attributed to De
partment of Defense activities and the commercial fuels and explo
sives industry, though the specific causes of contamination have yet
to be rigorously established; the Defartment has refused to ac
knowlec!ge a causal relationship unti an extensive study is com
pleted. The Committee is aware of the controversy surrounding the
evaluation of perchlorate contamination of groundwater in SOuth
ern California and other areas across the country. The Committee
directs the Department to conduct a joint study with the Environ
mental Protection Agency of perchlorate groundwater contamina
tion, to be completed within 180 days of the enactment of this Bill.
This report will examine in detail perchlorate groundwater pollu
tion in and around the Colorado River, San Bernardino County, the
Cochella Valley, Santa Clara River and the Imperial Valley that
threatens drinking and irrigation water supplies in Southern Cali
fornia, Arizona and Nevada. This report will assess the breadth
and scope of contamination and make preliminary recommenda
tions that will, at a minimum include:
1. Recommendations for the establishment of a national
sUpldard for acceptable levels of perchlorate groundwater con
tamination;
2. Determination of the military/defense industry sources
that have contributed to perchlorate contamination; and
3. Outline appropriate steps to be taken to mitigate or clean
up those areas that are deemed to be the government's respon
sibility.
OVERSEAS HUMANITARIAN, DISASTER, AND CMC AID
Fiscal. year 2003 appropriation $58,400,000
Fiscal ;lIear 2004 bUilget request 59.000,000
COmnuttell reoommendation 59,000,000
Overseas Humanitarian, Disaster, and Civic Aid. The recommenda
tion is an increase of $600,000 from the amount appropriated in
fiscal year 2003.
FORMER SOVIET UNION THREAT REDUCTION
Fi9Clll year 2003 apJlI'oprlation :. $416,700,000
Fiscal ;lIear 2004 budget request 460,800,000
COlIllDlttee recommendation 450,800,000
Change from budget request . ..
This appropriation funds the Former Soviet Union Threat Reduc
tion actiVIties of the Department of Defense. The recommendation
is the same as the budget request and an increase of $34,100,000
above the amount appropriated in fiscal year 2003. .
The Committee directs that $39,400,000 requested for the second
year of the new Proliferation Prevention Initiative (PPI) be redi
rected for the elimination of strategic nuclear delivery systems in
...
/081
PAGES
1&2
REDACTED
• OFFICE OF THE UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE

WASHINGTON, DC 20301-3000
ACQUISITION,
TECHNOLOGY
AND LOGISTICS
JAN 1 ! 2004
Mr. Michael O. Leavitt
Administrator
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20460
Dear Mr. Leavitt:
In its report accompanying the Fiscal Year 2004 Defense Appropriations Act, the
House Appropriations Committee directed the Department of Defense and the
Environmental Protection Agency to conduct a joint study of perchlorate groundwater
contamination in and around the Colorado River, San Bernardino County, the Cochella
Valley, Santa Clara River, and the Imperial Valley. Further, the Committee directed the
submission of a report, within 180 days of enactment of the Appropriations Act, defining
the breadth and scope of contamination, preliminary recommendations regarding
establishment of a national drinking water standard, and appropriate steps related to
mitigation or cleanup (enclosed).
My point of contact for the study and the report isl .

.JTo meet the deadlines establisfleain the Committee's report, I
request you designate a representative to work with Lieutenant Colonel Cornell, to
structure an approach to meet the Committee's requirements.
Sincerely,
~l~
Alex A. Beehler
Assistant Deputy Under Secretary of Defense
(Environment, Safety and Occupational Health)
Enclosures:
As stated
REPORT
108TH CONGRESS} HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES {
1st S~Bsion 108-187
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
APPROPRIATIONS BILL, 2004
REPORT
OF THE
COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS
TOGETHER WITH
ADDITIONAL VIEWS
[TO ACCOMPANY H.ll. 2658]
JULY 2, 2003.-Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the

State of the Union and ordered to be printed
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRImING OmCE

88-078 WASHINOTON : 2003
96
ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, NAVY
Fi'scal )'ear 2004 biiliget request 256,153,000
ComJIllttee recommendation 256,153,000
Change from budget request .. .
Environmental Restoration, Navy. The recommendation is a de
crease of $795,000 from the amount appropriated in fiscal year
2003.
ISLAND OF VIEQUES
The Committee expects the Navy to provide sufficient levels of
funding to meet the Navy's commitment to undertake environ
mental remediation on the island ofVieques.
ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, AIR FORCE
Fiscal year 2004 budget request 38',307,000
Committee recommendation 38',307,000
Environmental Restoration, Air Force. The recommendation is a
decrease of $5,466,000 from the amount appropriated in fiscal year
2003.
ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION, DEFENSE-WIDE
Fiscal ,ear 2004 builger. request 24,081,000
CODlDllttee recommendation 24,081,000
Environmental Restoration, Defense-Wide. The recommendation is
an increase of $583,000 from the amount appropriated in fiscal
year 2003.
ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATIO~ FORMERLY USED
DEFENSE SITE~
Fiscal year 2003 appropriation .. $2Ml,102,OOO

Fiscal year 2004 budget request .. 212,619,000
Committee recommendation . 221,369,000
Change from budget request .. ...8,750,000
The adjustments to the budget for Environmental Restoration,
Formerly Used Defense Sites are shown below: .
{In lIJoWlancla of dollanJ
29150 Environmental Study of Former NIKE Missile Site . $250
291150 David's Island Fort Slocllm Remediation . 2,500
29150 Fibers Clean-up Front Royal .. 6,000
PERCHLORATE GROUNDWATER CONTAMINATION STUDY
Perchlorate is a salt, commonly used in a host of commercial and
military applications ranging from rocket fuels and fireworks ·to
automobile airbags. High levels of perchlorate are known to inter
fere with thyroid gland and mental acuity functiollB and with the
97
human body's ability to produce growth and fetal development hor

mones. Though much is known about perchlorate, the specific long
term effects and the specific dosage levels at which perchlorate be
comes hazardous are still being debated in the environmental, sci
entific and medical communities. In Southern California, growing
groundwaterperchlorate contamination is widelr. attributed to De
partment of Defense activities and the commercial fuels and explo
sives industry, though the specific causes of contamination have yet
to be rigorously established; the Department has refused to ac
knowledge a causal relationship until an extensive study is com
pleted. The Committee is aware of the controversy surrounding the
evaluation of perchlorate contamination of groundwater in South
ern California and other areas across the country. The Committee
directs the Department to conduct a joint study with the Environ
mental Protection Agency of perchlorate groundwater contamina
tion, to be completed within 180 days of the enactment of this Bill.
This report will examine in detail perchlorate groundwater pollu
tion in and around the Colorado River, San Bernardino County, the
Cochella Valley, Santa Clara River and the Imperial Valley that
threatens drinking and irrigation water supplies in Southern Cali
fornia, Arizona and Nevada. This report will 88sess the breadth
and scope of contamination and make preliminary recommenda
tions that will, at a minimum, include:
1. Recommendations for the establishment of a national
standard for acceptable levels of perchlorate groundwater con
tamination;
2. Determination of the military/defense industry sources
that have contributed to perchlorate contamination; and
3. Outline appropriate steps to be taken to mitigate or clean
up those areas that are deemed to be the government's respon
sibility.
OVERSEAS HUMANITARIAN, DISASTER, AND CMC AID
Fiecallear 2004 bUQget req st 59,000,000
Comrmttee recommendation 59,000,000
Change from bUdget request . ..
.T he Committee recommends an appropriation of $59,000,000 for
Overseas Humanitarian, Disaster.c and CIvic Aid. The recommenda
tion is an increase of $600,000 tram the amount appropriated in
fiscal year 2003.
FORMER SOVIET UNION THREAT REDUCTION
Fiscal year 2003 apl'ropriation $416,700,000
Fiscal fear 20~ budget request 450,800,000
ComllUttee recommendation 450,800,000
Change from budget request .. .
This appropriation funds the Former Soviet Union Threat Reduc
tion activities of the Department of Defense. The recommendation
is the same as the budget request and an increase of $34,100,000
above the amount appropriated in fiscal year 2003. .
The Committee directs that $39,400,000 requested for the second
year of the new Proliferation Prevention Initiative (PPI) be redi
rected for the elimination of strategic nuclear delivery systems in
/59~
10
PAGES
REMOVED
PRIORITIZATION OF SAMPLING FOR
PERCHLORATE AT DoD FACILITIES IN CALIFORNIA
DoD Components have voluntarily undertaken sampling for perchlorate at

Defense Environmental Restoration Program sites, in accordance with CERCLA
and the NCP, and collected samples at drinking water supply systems in
accordance with the Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule, as implemented
by states. Much of the information collected to date has been made available to
regulatory agencies. To adequately plan and budget for future program
requirements, DoD recently issued policy, which directs DoD Components to
sample for perchlorate at all remaining sites where a perchlorate release is
suspected because of DoD activities and where a complete human exposure
pathway is likely to exist (enclosure). In carrying out this policy in California,
DoD Components will work in coordination with California regulatory agencies to
prioritize perchlorate sampling at installations and Formerly Used Defense Sites
(FUDS) in the context of any ongoing environmental response, to include
consideration of scheduI.es, available funding, and base closure activities, and in
accordance with the following guidelines.
Guidelines:
These guidelines outline planning, prioritization, and reporting of perchlorate
sampling undertaken by DoD Components at installations and FUDS in California
in coordination with California regulatory officials.
1. Planning
In accordance with DoD policy, DoD Components will screen those remaining
installation and FUDS sites where DoD use of perchlorate may have resulted in a
release to the environment. For those sites determined to have used perchlorate,
DoD Components will work with California regulatory agencies to determine if a
release is likely to have occurred in quantities resulting in complete human
exposure pathway. The following are activities to be carried out by DoD
Components and State efficials in screening sites for possible sampling:
DoD
Review existing records to determine likelihood of perchlorate occurrence. DoD
Components should consider the volume of perchlorate used, or disposed, and/or
the extent of perchlorate related activities at installation and FUDS-site. Activities
that could potentially contribute to perchlorate occurrence include, but are not
limited to:
a. The manufacture/maintenance of missiles, rockets and/or munitions

containing perchlorate;
b. The use ofperchlorate-containing munitions for training or testing
purposes;
c. The demilitarization ofperchlorate-containing munitions using
techniques, such as "hog-out" of rockets and missiles containing solid
propellant; and,
d. Open burning/open detonation operations.
State Agencies
• Evaluate whether there is a potential relationship between perchlorate
detections in drinking water supply wells and nearby (within 5 miles)
DoD installations or FUDS. Geographical Infonnation System (GIS)
data provided by the USEPA and other sources will be used as well as
analytical results from drinking water supply wells. The screening will
cover installations and FUnS located within one mile and five miles
from supply wells. The State Agency will infonn DoD Components of
their findings.
• Evaluate if perchlorate has been sampled from drinking water supply
wells located within one mile and five miles of DoD installations or
FUDS using historical analytical results.
2. Prioritization
Remaining sites identified through screening as possible sources of perchlorate
contamination with completed pathways of exposure will be prioritized for
sampling in coordination with California regulatory agencies. Prioritization tiers
are provided to aid the project managers in evaluating the whether possible
perchlorate releases from DoD activities at an installation or FUDS sites have the
potential to impact drinking water supply wells (public and domestic).
High Priority
• Potential releases of perchlorate in groundwater resulting from DoD
activities at installations or FUDS one mile or less hydrogeologically
upgradient of a drinking water supply well (public or domestic)
Medium Priority
• Potential releases of perchlorate in groundwater resulting from DoD
activities at installations or FUDS between one and five miles
hydrogeologically upgradient of a drinking water supply well (public or
domestic); .
• Groundwater treatment effluent at installations with a known potential
source of perchlorate; or
• Potential releases to surface water through surface runoff release of
perchlorate in soil from DoD activities at installations or FUDS.
Low Priority
• Potential releases of perchlorate in groundwater from DoD activities at
installations or FUDS with no confirmation of a relationship to drinking
water supply wells.
The State will consider the information gathered by DoD Components at

installations and formerly used defense sites in their facilities screening and the
DHS/EPA data base in making recommendations to DoD Components regarding
sampling. The prioritization will be organized from the highest to the lowest
probability of potential impacts on public and/or domestic drinking water supply
wells.
3. Sampling
State and DoD Components will work cooperatively to define sampling
requirements for each installation or FUDS site.
• If the DoD Components identify significant data gapes) which are identified
as a high priority during the screening, the DoD Components will develop a
sampling plan an~ schedule to address the data gapes). The sampling plan
should address primarily groundwater sampling, utilizing EPA or
California approved analytical methods for the appropriate media.
• The sampling plan and schedule will be coordinated with regulators.
• The State shall assess the need to collect split samples.
4. Reporting.
DoD Components shall report results of sampling to regulatory agencies
concurrent with reporting required by the DoD sampling policy. Results shall be
submitted in a format consistent with the format required by the DoD sampling
policy.
1. Screening
DoD State Agency

• Review records for onsite • Evaluate data for a relationship
perchlorate use, disposal,
between perchlorate detections in
processing
supply wells and their proximity to
...
DoD facilities (facilities located
r'"
within one mile and a five miles
from supply wells)
• Evaluate the analytical results for
supply wells within one mile and
five miles of DoD facilities to
determine if the water supply wells
have been sampled for emergent
chemicals
13~5
PAGES
REMOVED
/305
OFFICE OF THE UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE

WASHINGTON. DC 20301·3000

ACQUISITION.
TECHNOLOGY
AND LOGISTICS
MEMORANDUM FOR ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE ARMY

(INSTALLATIONS AND ENVIRONMENT)
ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE NAVY
(INSTALLATIONS AND ENVIRONMENT)
ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE
(INSTALLATIONS, ENVIRONMENT, AND LOGISTICS)
DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY (DSS-E)
SUBJECT: Interim Policy on Perchlorate Sampling
There are a number of actions that the Department of Defense (DoD) has
undertaken to address perchlorate in drinking water, including monitoring for perchlorate
through the Safe Drinking Water Act's (SDWA) Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring
Rule (UCMR), monitoring surface water discharge under the Clean Water Act (CWA) at
States' requests, and collection of data on occurrence of perchlorate at Defense
Environmental Rest9ration Program (DERP) sites. Given recent public concerns over
possible risks associated with perchlorate, the Department believes it is appropriate to
take additional measures to assess the extent of perchlorate occurrence at active and
closed installations, ranges, and Fonnerly Used Defense Sites (FUDS). Towards that
end, DoD Components shall continue to consolidate existing perchlorate occurrence data,
and shall sample any previously unexamined sites where a perchlorate release is
suspected because of DoD activities and where a complete human exposure pathway is
likely to exist. DoD Components shall establish and maintain databases containing the
information listed in the enclosed spreadsheets described in each section below. This
policy supercedes the DoD November 13,2002, memorandum; Perchlorate Assessment
Policy.
1. SDWA
The UCMR (40 CFR Parts 9, 141, 142) mandates that all community and non
transient non-community water systems serving more than 10,000 people, as well as
smaller systems selected by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), monitor
for specific contaminants, including perchlorate. Some military installations are subject
to the UCMR and, therefore, should be testing for the presence of perchlQrate and
repurting the results to EPA and state regulators, as appropriate. UCMR !:ampling and
reporting is a Class 1 compliance-funding requirement. This requirement is not
applicable to FUDS.
.X ~. f., .,.
j~ ...
f
,
.~; ," ."1
:<.; " l:
I
.; ,;;
,~ .
I·
~ '.
, '<J':
,. I
.' ;
.~ ...
I
~
I
Enclosure 2
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
-:----------
sampling Results
Iul8blIoIiN'" I St8
1
·, .• i',
...·AIIftI
••••
lEX: SmIth Gun,BaA,,1
EX: XAlrBese ", ~;\, ; I

," . ".,
Only II months sampling WhIch begail111Jll3.
rnonltorlng,ontyattralnln~J18nge ,
lAunltiOiiaill8anli1g~~ii:iiIto~
_tmeiltpt8m. 8,illoniilMillpllng~
'
',', " ...;".--'
••
HlO2. . '. •. ',,', '. ")'\':';""
-----
nOfflU"lIIlI8Cllan,IImlL('!c, ~,. •__. -
[EX:~~~f\~?'1 '~~~~f&R:
--- --'-0.;;;',,\;;;';:/;',:;1. ,,~~~ _/;:-:;;;t-'-l':'~{;;~;:;:'
------
.'~ ;-,~.~:.."" -·,·I·:.;~-~,,~(.>-·:~
.' ,' :,"" ~:~:~ ~~>-, :":
~ir:'-:'~:'; :: '7tl'~'~f':, I·~.-:::. '~'~~::::l;'6i ','- : . :; -F: . ,-".!.;' ~·,f;;~:)<:.~,'U:~:;,:xt:~:.;:: ;_,' "
~:-o. • .... ;;~•. "''''~~~'''''~\),f!' ,,,,,,,,
. '-~-~;."'i-\'~'t~ ':~::'~'~;,[;' -".' .:

;~~.::~'-:,~~~'" ,:::'::.~';;s. ;;'Y'~;"<~' 'i· ·,. .·L ••.·.• /'.' .. '"
--:'-'I',"~";< . .~_.:.:"i'~·. ;~ rp: .>:i";' .,;,::ji>~~~: ~:~:::T~:f ~;;~;,f~}PF. ,;.>":.~ '~~~:;~~" ,:
. ·..·,;~*I"ik,;;:': "f~".~': :~ ~" .'_";·.-:':',·4?·;;i:~~~j~·E(>f! ~:.'
--
I
..,' ~'i,; ...·· ", ;i.",.,...j:.i'f 'j;:;~",'~:Z~~~" ~"'~);':~i:, ,>~,:.':.~J;~;]:{{~;:> :~":t~1Y;}.~~ ;'.
"', ,. ':'<;/~.~:':': .>::: ·,:;:t::,:~r.~~::~::.
--
:;.~':t;;-..::. " ,.;~~. ,;~;?t.~;:~~~.~';'
;--':<~':'~·..'l· ~ .;~,L'~ . . _; ~,~;+;;:~i~,;:~~; ~:'~
---
--
-',,;.',1 .'
' ..... ~'..i..,
--
..':' ;, : :~.>;.~ ·.~:3~' .•:;·:. :.::';';
\~,: ~ ~{;~.~:~~&'j~;.~~;;~~±.:~.;::;.~. , ~:+~','Er 0;.·,r~.~.r~T;:s .~
. . ..I<.,.::::-.:.,~. ':·":--';·i"~I.."·.~·~ '>""-' '-"'~";'" "~';;;'J:'::~: :(::~
"'''':\i,:'','
I.'·
,,':';':.!
,'
-
I I I T1nrI I I II I I I I ITI I ITTT
I I j
:1 I I
I
I
I
I III I I I
II
I I II I
I
I1I
1
I!
H~:lift
I I
I 1111111 1dI! I :i
U 1111111, il i lli'
I I I I I IJ I I I I I I IJ I I I I I I
...J..J.
I I
11111111,11/1 I'·
1
Each Component shall establish and maintain a database of UCMR sampling

activities. The database shall include installation identification information, all data
points collected, and, at a minimum, the information listed in enclosure 1. DoD
Components shall work with the DoD SDWA Services Steering Committee in compiling
a consolidated DoD report of UCMR sampling results by January 31, 2004.
II. CWA
Several states require some military installations to monitor for perchlorate under
the CWA National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit program.
Sampling and reponing ill compliance with an NPDES permit is a Class I compliance
funding requirement. This requirement is not applicable to FUDS.
Each DoD Component shall establish and maintain a database of sampling data
(by discharge point) for those permitted discharges that have a perchlorate reporting
requirement in their NPDES pennit, or other state requirement to monitor for perchlorate.
The DoD Components shall list every NPDES discharge point required to monitor for
perchlorate. The database will contain, at a minimum, the information listed in enclosure
2. DoD Components shall work with the DoD CWA Services Steering Committee in
compiling a consolidated poD report of NPDES sampling results by January 31, 2004.
III. Environmental Restoration
DoD Components shall continue to consolidate existing perchlorate occurrence

data at DoD active or closed installations, non-operational ranges, and FUnS. For these
categories, DoD Components shall also program resources and sample for the presence of
perchlorate at any previously unexamined site where there is a reasonable basis to suspect
that a release has occurred as a result of DoD activities and where a complete human
exposure pathway is likely to exist. DoD Components shall consult with their office of
counsel to determine an appropriate course of action with regard to sampling at sites
involving potentially responsible parties other than DoD.
In determining the likelihood of perchlorate occurrence, DoD Components should

consider the volume of perchlorate used, or disposed, and/or the intensity of perchlorate
related activities at the site. Activities that could potentially contribute to perchlorate
occurrence include, but are not limited to:
a. The manufacture/maintenance of missiles, rockets and/or munitions containing

perchlorates;
b. The use of perchlorate-containing munitions for training or testing purposes;
c. The demilitarization of perchlorate-containing munitions using techniques,
such as "hog-out" of rockets and missiles containing solid propellant; and,
d. Open burning/open detonation operations.
•
In assessing potential pathways of exposure, DoD Components should consider

whether there are:
a. Drinking water sources likely to be impacted by ground water or surface water

on or leaving the active or closed installation, non-oper<tlional range, or FUDS;
and/or,
b. Drinking water systems on or near the active or closed installation, non
operational range, or FUDS that are listed on EPA's UCMR database.
Each DoD Component shall establish and maintain a database of existing data and
the data collected pursuant to this policy at active and closed installations, non
operational ranges, and FUDS. The database will include, at a minimum, the infonnation
listed in enclosure 3. DoD Components shall work with the DoD Cleanup Committee in
compiling a consolidated DoD report of sampling results by January 31, 2004.
IV. Funding
DoD Components may only use envirollmental restoration funding for sampling
activities that meet DERP eligibility requirements described in the current version of the
DERP ManagementGuidance. Under DoDI 4715.6, "Environmental Compliance,"
perchlorate sampling is an Environmental Quality Status Class I requirement.
V. Ranges
Assessing operational ranges for the potential for off-range migration of

perchlorate is consistent with the Munitions Action Plan and the Defense Planning
Guidance (PPG) requirements. The DPG requires the Secretaries of the Military
Departments to assess potential hazards from off-range migration of munitions
constituents. This policy memorandum requires the Military Departments to include
perchlorate in future range assessments.
VI. Other Related Efforts
Currently EPA has only one approved method for testing for the presence of
perchlorate. This method (Method 314.0) is only approved for testing drinking water.
Alternative test methods have proven to be more accurate and reliable for other media
(Le., soil, sediment, groundwater, etc.). Therefore, DoD Components are required to
develop guidance for appropriate testing methodologies for perchlorate in. other media. If
alternative sampling protocols are used, the method must be documented in the enclosed
spreadsheets.
In addition, DoD Components shall continue to work together to develop and
demonstrate new technologies for treatment and cleanup of perchlorate. I appreciate your
support for these important efforts.
Phil W. rone
Principal Assistant Deputy Under Secretary of Defense
(Installations and Environment)
Enclosures:
1. UCMR Spreadsheet
2. NPDES Spreadsheet
3. Site Sampling Spre~dsheet
111 0 g
PAGE
REDACTED
IN ITS
ENTIRETY
JLlL-07-2003 13:53 OSD CLEANUP COADUSDCCL)) 703 695 4981 P.02/04
,6FFICE OF :THE UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE

3000 DEFENSE PENTAGON '
WASHINGTON, DC,2030'.,3~
ACOUISITION,
TECHNOLOGY
AND LDGISTICS
,I , I
JUl 3 2003
Honorable Winston H. Hickox
Agency Secretary
California Environmental Protection Agency
1001 1 Street '
Sacr,amento, CA 95814
1
Dear Mr. Hickox,
Thank you for your letter of June 6. 2003. I Ipok forward to working with you
on developing an informed. balanced, risk, management response to perchlorate in
conjunction with the affected indusui,e~, and communit;ies.
The Department of Defense has already collected. some information on the

presence of perchlorate at California sites. We have enclosed a copy of the most
current infonnation we have and will direct the Military Services to provide you I
with any ~fOrmation they already have. '

,
While, EPA works towards definitively 8;ddressing the health questians and
issuing an official MCL. the Department is in"esting in activities that will enable
us to step out quickly once EPA establishes the MCL:
» I i~sued a policy in November 2002, allQwing the Military Services to

sample for perchlorate if there is a reasonable basis to suspect perchlorate is
present and an exposure pathway exists. The Department of Defense is in
the process of developing a more comprehensive sampling policy for
perchlorate which will be out later this summer.
» The Department of Defense. over the last several years, has spent over $25
million on research directed at perchlorate issues.' This includes
.approximalely $4.5 million, on technology for treatment and cleanup of
perchlorate. We are, currently co-sponsoring a pilot on in-situ biological
treatment in California. We are preparing to publish a' book that compares
the current perchlorate cleanup technologies for efficiency and
effectiveness. We are posturing ourselves to be able to respond
immediately when California, other states, and the EPA set cleanup and
drinking water standards.
» Our Environmental Quality Data Working Oroup is working with EPA staff
to develop a reliable, consistent methodology for testing for the pre~ence of
perchlorate in various media.
~, .
Till VI? 201113 10: 36

703 695 4981 PAGE. 02
JUL-07-2003 13:53
'» The Army is taking steps to r;eplace perchlorate in two key munitions that
account for over 70% of usage in' me Army.
In addition, the Department of Defense is complying with EPA's Umegulated

Cont:2.minant Monitoring Rule. Along with many other drinking water sy,stems
across the United States, our systems that meet the EPA size requirements, are'
conducting sampling for perchlorate over a consecutive 12 month period from
2001 to 2003 and reporting those results to EPA's Safe Drinking Water Accession
and 'Review System (SDWARS/uCMR). The infonnation in SDWARS/uCMR is
already available to state officials.
Dealing with emerging chemicals of concern is a challenge to all of us. We

need to work cooperatively to ensure that addresses these challenges in a
thoughtful, deliberative manner.' I look forward to working with you to develop 'an
approach based on sound science that is fully protective of human health and the
environment.
We are evaluating the specifiC requests in your lener of June 6, 2003. To

establish a collaborative approach to these issues, I recommend we immediately
form an interagency working group to advise us jointly on options for addressing ,
perchlorate and other emerging contaminants. I have provided a similar letter to
Mr. Lowry, and ~s. Cantu.
Sincerely,
(1L-fLt J~_
do~iau1 Woodley, Jr.
9
Assistant Deputy Under SecretarY of Defense
(Environment)
Enclosure
Till iii? 20133 10: 36

703 695 4981 FlAGE.03
Apr it
000 and Non·Doll rCfchlorale Sites
~
=
Sl
. ..
F
.a
~v
u _
.~. ; . _
. - ~ ': ._.. :". • .~ _~ t :~_
.J.~· · :' _~_. 1E~~.~... .~'~_.:
',J~' :·~~;1·~~- . ~ .~~~.~.~ ~.- .'..~. . ;:~_ ...;.'" ~-~ -·l~~·"-B.1*;g,-·_
r./t,~~~ ;:.'j .g. . ._~~;~~ jJ::. " ~ ~ ~~
~
'I" • I
~~'.80'1fI
-
.
HOlt-DaD A...tc;itnenl(llIflerl RInd1cl(;oi..... ell yes GW,OW DculP"",_Ooe'3fIJOllltldf seurce·Rod<C1
Maua AnI, .
anne FII_n R1'JIletl MIltui· 5IIl DIs/lid ~.lWI_dng
Sl
...
'Iori~ A1..... l1spt011Yl$ u,.. CA ,. OW.S'fII Ba",... Boxell 10M t 0rJIlIre· 4111 DioIricI SDutlll! ·EJp/OIl1rel
rn.-Yeinsllaln lAaIIuladUmt p
J'I
Na\Iy BlI.to",MCL8 8a1S!..... CA
- .
81tl1el.~
- I
- - (..J
. ~Fe_l.- VI
tAl
Alff..m.i lIea1eAFB Mal\'iIVllle CII 'let OW 1~'Box"
~orie~n DolI_ oee .
W~ Keigtr· ?nd Oislfldl
3ftt DItltkN'
- Ro1leIt T.MIUUI·51ItOftljler . .
DOE ~~.N~ lienIa 8uSIN CA ye~ OW ~rllata 8olre,' $Cll.ce • Rodlel
II SIanIa 6_ Fitll lAb DianneF*,_ Reualdl. TI_loO IItII
usoOE - PIocb:tion
N*"Y ca...,P""""MOB
oceanside CA ftO ~"Borer( - o
DIaMe FIIMIlin (Il
1:1
Navy CIlIna LtIc8 ClIitliLoha CII
~~::st-"iI ~I l'U Ila""Boxe.1
In n
~*"Y ~oe" C4lnCOld CA ftC
=lt8alcIl'
lieF....
~ Mi\ltl·1\f\ DlIJritII Eften
p. TIl\lldltf· IQiaDCslricf -
r
rn
Ha1/)" Qi!w
COlClna ell Y'IS flcil reperled Nl'lI.......,
Gary r.tlIII•• end O!ailld'ken ~
. - OIllll,-FelMlflin CdlrM - ~ 0iS11tcv D....lllat -- !fi
-
- eo.".
• 49IIlll'lfllflb
,. .
Dl.A DD 8aIlJoequln-Sharpa UlflrOll CA -- llalblf1l
.'. OlanneF.l.t\lII -
o
DlA ~ lIaiI Jeaqurn· ""C)'
TfllC'/ ell, III_fa 80lretl ~
- lit
e
m
AlfF_
E.,.,4sAl'B EilWU1Ie CA :PI'llP~lal>. YM. GW.,Oil llUld1ll1y *'" jhbaiaeo.M CltAlIUl!ll*'f' 20111~ tteua . IIocte11t tt
Navy ElTOto l1VInI

ollll8ate
CA EOOAIfllII yea
~jlII
QW
CIflfitptI.. IIlatlnaf'lltlIffln_
Ii..... Bo_
WI1f8I1l M. 1TMtNs·:m1ldOIiltld FIeo~fC"
. ~~r4R.R....4lIfl\OIarlclt B8AC
_ . p
- DlaMeFeln.... - pina~•. _ 0lMtldI '-'
v
~..Slnchltz ••"" Ills1tlcV
. Cllr· ....DIsftIc:1 -

- .
-
OOE £nugy tadl"lioY CA -
Noli-DoD
£nOifttedhO 01*
ITC (UtIledT.cImoIogIesJ SanJoiIa ell ",. ow Blllbial Bow" . RIdlIlftlW. PGllIIo· flthDII11ldJ Sou_ rlMilg -Itoac:Q,
~
OilNl. Ftlnsl8~ AonaG.EsIlaD·I.Ok1tlc11
UIIre Honda· 151lllllslllcV ZOe
,..s fjV, lIIibe.. BOJ<ItI ElklnO. TaHdt.,-IOthOlsIllctl ~. ODE E"PlaIlves
ID
~
flOE
Nal.".,. . _,,8ile
Uwl8tce lNtmlOftl TfllCy CA
OIanne feNflln RlcN,cfV'. POIllbo ·11111 OItfrlCfl R_1dI
NotI-OIO __vair
l.ol:Ilhtecl Pf!lIlUlIlcn \Ippf RldllnlI C4 yea ow 8ubat.~rf Je'trLewls. e'.lllloltlcl Sou...• fl«I<ef
". tb_ Felnllein - lI"ftlt!tlCfullna ..J
CSl
~p IlIiIFOfce MIIlwtN'8 Sacntlllllllo CA lIalllVa e-tl
D"."".Fllinll!aln
W.IfyIielge'·2IId.DltIddl
bouGla. OM •31dOlsflicll
Closecl (..J
(J1
AolIaItT.M."I1l-lIIIIlll6Itfd
Ul
NtFOlae IAcClelttnAF8 $_010. CA Battlet. Borell W• ., Ratte,· 2llClllillrlCll CloUd if
OJlllna FIlMItlln Dcut\U Ole • 3111 DlIlIletl A
IIotIett T lAIlIul· 51" Dltl1lcl
-0 .~.
~d
m. D--l "l:
~ r IS
-0 l>
~
$eel ••edIl1lfltll
OW • g/llllftlfW.1Iaf
sw •aurt_ wa'"
ND • _ <feteeI "
IS
l>
OW·4IIn1l1nt_. 1013 OBIOD • Open IiUmf eptIII dllonalfon
Apr .ft ';
F ,.
000 and Non-DotJ J'erchtOl'ale Sites
...
~ c
r
I\) I
~
lA
~ ,
p ~
IS}
(S)
w
~
IFUDS NIIlel4 .
,~ CA yes Bt,I"". lkIKlUf '
,01111'" feln.lelft
..
W
VI
A
Sunnyvale cA )W. low· nat

IIU' ....w
C
J"allllllale Cit. IF.
"'I Witfiam AI T......... _"All
t
r.
r
IT
l:
Z
C
Netdto'I1861lh FUDS
-.:
r
~
C
(f
t
r
r
r
'
RiaJIo CA OJlnl",v_, IlIJlPfV ",I(b,

I '---"'-----1 '
...,15 AmIt..
-oJ
CSl
. I
CllIt8I1'
m
(II
.aJ. . I I I f I I I ~'lI1Il'fI. EPA

IlAInlilIed
IAU.' MIIu.... fA
1
J . I , . .:
IS
Lo
(J
U
V
"'(J
D
I~ I""'' ' NP I RtI.... ~l
I I I 18aIIlar. eo..,f
DI..~ ' ..n,,",
I . }-.
I U
b
II
OJ
Gl
m .
"l
..
CSl
- IS
OJ
Sed-ledI_
GW-~lI!r . sw· lUrf&oe Wllei "
IS
ow -cMll/nt N1er NO·nClrlde!ed "
2<113
()IM)D ....." llulfll ClPIn cllIIciaIllon
Apllt;~
,
,
000 and Non-DOO t'erct!lorate Sites
L
(SI !",
C
r
I
IS
-J
~W
'"
~ Ole""* yo to"
tAl
ro fi.......... )'8S GW.OW·'
'~"
W/IlIliie--v JOtS GW
Se&l1iieIdl 1 CA ~ tf'" retIOdCd

F~- I CA J'I Hal ftlpClllcd
8011-'
~
l_ I CPo )'8' (1
~
.ow
~
Itdilatet -I CA yes
8aInlaClarta I CA JIll DW '.,.,..ra8ll11t11 iir_ -0iiINn0e
iltIlIlI8M.. IlIa1allalliln..........CU,""",OI1 It. HlIII_1 ""0"''''LIst (NPLI
D~lVltiF."""'" I~
i
G
(II
.(1t:l. .
- \J
r
V
it..ISJ
0'1
~ ~
to.
~
m
~
~
l>
~. . .
~
D-f L
QO IS:
m-f
I\:
islP
I\J
-0 'sect··seclltnenl
B\Y • surface wale' l"C
NO • nan deltQ
~ OW· cI1lnlWl._,
GW -..,nctwatet
3013 OM)[)· "P'" bumf CIpII'I <leIGl\lllOn

PAGE
REDACTED
IN ITS
ENTIRETY
California Legislative Perchlorate Requirements - 5B 1004 and AB 826

,0
8hd StlPtllatibns
Senate Bill 1004: An September The requirements • Military munitions storage The bill requires that on or before January 1, 2005, and
Act to Amendthe 29,2003 apply to all facilities within a military annually thereafter, unless the owner or operator has met
Water Code Related to perchlorate storage installation that meet the DoD the alternative compliance requirements of subdivision (b),
Resources facilities that stores Explosive Safety Board an owner or operator ofa storage facility that has stored in
over 500 pounds of requirements are exempt from any calendar year since January 1, 1950, over 500 pounds
perchlorate in any this regulation. ofperchlorate shall submit to the state board all ofthe
calendar year. following information:
• Facilities storing perchlorate • Volume ofperchlorate stored each year.
for retail or law enforcement • Method of storage.
purposes. • Location of storage.
Note: To the extent authorized byfederal law. in the case
• Drinking water storage ofa perchlorate storagefacility under the control ofthe
reservoirs. Armed Forces ofthe United States, "location" means the
name and address ofthe property within which the
perchlorate storagefacility is located.
The bill requires that on or before January 1, 2005, and
annually thereafter, unless the owner or operator has met
the alternative compliance requirements of subdivision (b),
an owner or operator ofa storage facility that has stored in
any calendar year since January 1, 1950, over 500 pounds
ofperchlorate shall submit to the state board documents
relating to any monitoring undertaken for potentialleak:s
into the water bodies ofthe state.
The bill requires the state board to compile and maintain
all information obtained, and will make the information
available for oublic review.
The bill allows the state board to charge an annual fee to
each owner ofa storage facility that provides information
to the board. The fee can be no more than $100 for each
ear the information is orovided.
The bill requires individuals must report water discharges
of 10 or more ofoerchlorate.
The bill requires the state board to publish and make
available to the public on or before January 1, 2006, a
list ofpast and present perchlorate storage facilities within
the state.
California Legislative Perchlorate Requirements - 5B 1004 and AB 826
.
Assembly BillNo. 826: September The bill applies to all The bill requires the Department of Toxic Substances
The Perchlorate 29,2003 perchlorate facilities Control to establish standards for best management
Contamination and discharges of practices for the handling of perchlorate materials by.31
Prevention Act perchlorate December 2005.
containing The bill prohibits a person from managing perchlorate
substances. materials after the effective date ofthe regulations, except
in compliance with the best management practices
soecified in the regulations.
The bill directs the California Environmental Protection
Agency to establish the framework for a statewide
database that connects with its geographic management
svstem for collecting data from local al!encies.
The bill requires the owner or operator ofa perchlorate
facility, located within a 5-mile radius of a public drinking
water well that has been found by a state or local agency
to be contaminated with perchlorate to submit to the
Environmental Protection Agency, on or before July 1,
2004 a summary of any subsurface and any groundwater
monitoring, investigation, or remediation work that has
been oerfonned at the facilit,.
The bill requires a business that handles any amount of
perchlorate materials to prepare and submit a business
Ian and an inventory.
~,'J,
PAGE
REDACTED
IN ITS
ENTIRETY
FFID Installation Component Program Sampled Detected Comments Known Human

Exposure
CA957172462700 AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DERA Yes Not detected
PLANT 42
CA957212450800 BEALE AIR AIR FORCE DERA Yes In Groundwater No exposure
FORCE BASE 492 ug/L, max pathway.
detect at site 16, Groundwater not
OB?OD monitoring used for drinking
well water
CA917002471200 CORONA NOC NAVY DERA Yes Awaiting Results
NWAD
CA957172450400 EDWARDS AIR AIR FORCE DERA Yes Groundwater, soil Source - Rocket No exposure
FORCE BASE Research 300.ppb pathway.
detected in Groundwater not
Groundwater plume. used as drinking
An innovative ion water.
exchange perchlorate
treatment technology
is currently being
demonstrated at
Edwards AFB. The
groundwater
underlying North Base
is contaminated by
both perchlorate and
organic solvents.
CA99799F522900 EDWARDS FORMERLY DERA Yes Detected in soil

MILITARY AIR USED DEFENSE (max detect 36000
FIELD SITES ug/L in plume from
jet propulsion lab)
CA99799F546700 JET FORMERLY DERA Yes Drinking water Source - Rocket

PROPULSION USED DEFENSE Research
LAB SITES
. .
CA957002474300 MATHER AFB AIR FORCE BRAC Mather AFB was a

BRAC round I closure
and the base is a NPL
site, so we are
performing
environmental
cleanup under the
CERCLA process with
State and Federal
regulator oversite. We
have a groundwater
plume under Mather
as a result of .
AerojeUBoeing past pr
CA99799F598500 MCAS EL FORMERLY DERA Yes Groundwater 380 BRAC No exposure

TORO USED DEFENSE ppb pathway.
SITES Groundwater not
used as a drinking
water source.
CA99799F527300 NAVAL FORMERLY DERA Yes Yes No exposure
WEAPONS USED DEFENSE pathway.
CENTE CHINA SITES
LAKE
CA99799F548300 NIKE BATTERY FORMERLY DERA Yes (not Groundwater Records search will Exposure pathway
14 - SILOS USED DEFENSE sampled address potential suspected. 000
SITES by 000) FUDS eligibility for confirmation is
emergent chemicals pending.
identified in letter rec'd
from reg agency.
,"
CA957002434500 NORTON AFB AIR FORCE BRAC The former Norton

AFB is adjacent to
known perchlorate
plume (Crafton
Redlands Plume).
Lockheed Martin is
the "owner" (PRP)
of the perchlorate
plume. They work
with federal and
state regulatory
agencies and local
lA1'~tCllr nllr\lCl\lnr~ nn
CA99799F596000
NWS SEAL FORMERLY DERA
Yes Awaiting Results
BEACH USED DEFENSE
SITES
CA957112573600
ONIZUKA AS AIR FORCE BOTH
Yes Not detected
CA99799F788600
PYRITE FORMERLY DERA
No Need to establish
CANYON USED DEFENSE FUDS eligibility.
SITES Records search will
also include checking
if any perchlorate
containing items were
stored/assembled, etc
on site or if site usage
during FUDS time era
could have
contributed to
conditions.
CA99799F557900
RIALTO FbRMERLY DERA
Yes (not Drinking water >4 Source - Fireworks Exposure pathway
AMMUNITION USED DEFENSE sampled ppb to 811 ppb Facility, BF Goodrich, suspected. DoD
STORAGE SITES by DoD) Rocket Research and confirmation is
POIT Manufacturing pending.
"
CA917002464000 SAN NICOLAS NAVY DERA Yes Groundwater 16 No exposure

ISLAND OlF ppb pathway. Impacted
,,4·_11_ ... _1 .. ..... _~
CA957182457500 TRAVIS AIR AIR FORCE DERA yes Groundwater, Site Dept. of Health No exposure
FORCE BASE 12 Services sampled pathway.
Groundwater not
used as a drinking
water source.
CA957112514900 VANDENBERG AIR FORCE DERA yes Soil. In Tested Soil, No exposure
AIR FORCE Groundwater, Groundwater, pathway.
BASE maximum detected Drinking water - found
was 517 ug/l in Groundwater site 8,
SlC4 in TCE plume.
~
4'--' ~€hemical Contaminant Found In Water Page 1 of2
ILl3}
./
L-----------
San Jose (CA) Mercury News
January 17, 2003
Chemical Contaminant Found In Water

Well in Morgan Hill closed; perchlorate detected in 12 of 100 rural sites tested
By Frank Sweeny, Mercury News
More than 300 drinking-water wells in the San Martin area may be contaminated with a chemical, used in the
manufacturing of rocket fuel and highway flares, that could cause health hazards for pregnant women and infants.
The chemical, perchlorate, has spread in a four-mile underground plume and could affect drinking-water supplies
for more than 2,000 people, officials said. Residents are being urged not to drink the water until it's been tested
by the water district.
Perchlorate has been detected in 12 of 100 wells tested in the unincorporated area between Gilroy and Morgan
Hill. One municipal well in Morgan Hill has been closed because of the contamination. Santa Clara Valley Water
District officials said Thursday that an additional 350 wells must be tested.
10/14/2005

CREW: Department of Defense: Department of The Air Force: Regarding Perchlorate: Scanned Perchlorate October 2008 HH

Încărcat de

Informații document

Titlu original

Drepturi de autor

Formate disponibile

Partajați acest document

Partajați sau inserați document

Opțiuni de partajare

Vi se pare util acest document?

Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

CREW: Department of Defense: Department of The Air Force: Regarding Perchlorate: Scanned Perchlorate October 2008 HH

Încărcat de

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

......... - ........

Ercole L. Cavalieri. Director

June 12, 2003

Dr. Julie Louise Gerberding. M.D., M.P.H.

RE: UNMC PERCHLORATE STATE OF THE SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM (PS 3)

Dear Dr. Gerberding:

Ercole ·L. Cavalieri. Directo~

MlIY 20, 2003

.Mr. Raymond DuBois

RE: UNMC PERCHLORAlE STATE OFTIiE SCltlNCC SYMPOSIUM (pS3)

Dear Mr. DuBois:

.' Pharmaeokinetic::s • Brain 1l101'phology

• Epidemiology • Endocrine disruption

The University of Nebraska ecavalie@unmc.edu

May 20. 2003

Dr. Paul Gilman

RE: UNMC PERCHLORATE STATE OF THE SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM (PS 3)

Dear Dr. Gilman:

The University of Nebraska ecuvalie@unmc.edu

Mark B. McClellan, M.D., Ph.D.

RE: UNMC PERCHLORATE STATE OF THE SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM (PS 3)

Dear Dr. McClellan:

Professor and Director

Ercole L. Cavalieri. Director

The University of Nebraska ecavalie@unmc.edu

Dr. Richard Williams

RE: UNMC PERCHLORATE STATE OF THE SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM (PS 3)

Dear Dr. Williams:

The University of Nebraska ecavalie@unmc.edu

May 20, 2003

Ms. Maureen Koetz

RE: UNMC PERCHLORATESTA1'EOFTHE SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM (PS 3 )

Dear Ms. Koetz:

Professor and Director

Ercole L. Cavalieri. Director

Dr. Christopher T. De Rosa

RE: UNMC PERCHLORATE STATE OF THE SClENCESYMPOSIUM (PS3)

Dear Dr. De Rosa:

20 May 2003 Draft

Air Force AmoldAFB Tullahoma TN yes Sed

Air Force Beale AFB Marysville CA yes GW

Air Force Buckley AFB Aurora CO no

Air Force Davis Monthan AFB Tucson AZ \

Air Force Ellsworth AFB Rapid City SD yes ND GWsampled

Air Force FE Warren AFB Cheyenne WY no

Air Force HiIIAFlji Ogden VT yes Soil,GW,DW

Air Force HoliomanAFB Gallup NM yes GW,SW, Source - Rocket Testing

Air Force MoodyAFB Valdosta GA no

Mountain Home AFB ID no

Air Force New Boston AFS Manchester, MA yes ND

Air Force OnizukaAFS Sunnyvale CA yes DW-nol Awaiting results of

Air Force Plant 4 Forth Worth TX ves NO

Air Force Plant 44 Tucson AZ ves ND

Air Force Poinsett Range ShawAFB SC yes GW

Air Force Randoloh AFB San Antonio TX no

Air Force TinkerAFB Oklahoma Cily OK no

State Test Site/Source Sampled

Air Force Vandenberg AFB Lompoc CA yes Soil

Air Force Westover AFB Chicopee MA no

Air Force Wright-Patterson AFB Dayton OH yes NO

Anny Aberdeen Proving Ground Aberdeen MD COAweils yes GW See above.

Anny Badger Anny Ammunition Baraboo WI yes NO state requested

Army Camp Navajo Bellemont AZ. Detonation Pits yes GW