Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
LAB 1
CE5337-NON DESTRUCTIVE
TECHNIQUES
BY:
GROUP-3
C.SHASHI KALYANCE13B014
CH .NAGARAJU-CE13B015
G.SNEHA SAGAR-CE13B020
P.JASHNAV-CE12B096
Application
Required Impact
Energy(N.m)
2.25
0.75
30
STANDARDS:
EXPERIMENTAL SETUP:
The concrete cube of 25 cm x 25 cm x 25 cm were casted specially for the test
and the cubes were tested in a compression machine.
OBSERVATIONS:
group 7:
Rebound Hammer(Q)
Load(in kN)
UPV(s)
Velocity (m/s)
2.7
30.9
4854
100
31.4
4777
200
30.9
4854
Side1
Side2
26.5
29.5
24
28.5
28
28
23
27.5
20.5
20.5
29.5
26
300
31.1
4823
400
31.4
4777
500
33.4
4491
600
35.9
4178
24.5
30.5
29.5
24.5
30
23
35
32
29.5
23.5
32.5
27
DISCUSSIONS:
The values from UPV show that the velocity reduces as the load increases,the
velocities for all except one are greater than 4.5km/s which means concrete
quality is excellent.
The rebound hammer values range from lowest of 20.5 which corresponds to
2000psi and to maximum of 35 which corresponds to 4500psi.The huge variation
may be due taking readings at same point repeatedly,improper handling of the
instrument.The values of rebound hammer did not clear follow any pattern but it
can seen there is an increase in the final values which shows that the rebound
hammer test is not completely reliable.
and reflected. This reflected wave is caught back again in receiver and the time
gap is measured which gives the distance of flaw/other material from the
transmitter based on pre-defined calibrated velocities in that medium.
Experimental Description:
All the necessary connections for using the Viking software was done initially and
then with the help of Hammer of medium size is used as impact generator or
Transmitter. On pre-marked measuring points, transducer is placed vertically to
receive the signal which is analysed by Vikings software. After analysing the
graph shown on the software screen, we measure peaks that correspond to
depths of change in medium which are supposed to be cracks, flaws or
boundaries of testing specimen.
Experimental data:
Serial No
Frequency(in KHz)
Distance(in mm)
1
8.79
231
2
2.93
694
3
4.39
463
4
8.79
231
5
8.79
231
6
8.79
231
7
7.81
260
8
6.84
297
9
7.33
278
10
8.30
245
11
8.79
231
12
8.79
231
Please refer to the attached image that contains the original observation
data taken on the date of experiment.
Results:
The average of all the depths calculated from the observed values as
301.91mmbut the actual depth of beam is 250mm.
However, I wanted to discard values corresponding to 2.93 KHz and 4.39
KHz as their depth measures 694mm and 463mm which are no way near
to the practical reality of 250mm.
Excluding these 2 experimental values from the observed data,
3.
Crack Depth Measurement in a
Stepped Beam - Indirect UPV
Method:
Introduction:
Surface opening cracks often occurs in concrete structures. They may appear
as a consequence of several degradation mechanisms such as repeated loading,
differential settlement, chemical attacks, drying shrinkage, and freeze-thaw
cycles, among others. While in some cases, surface opening cracks may only
affect the aesthetics of the concrete surface, in most cases they are an indication
of structural distress and/or decreased durability
Crack depth determination can be performed non-destructively by the timeof-flight diffraction technique. In this technique, stress waves are generated on
one side of the crack, with wave arrival times monitored by a transducer placed
on the opposite side of the crack. Stress waves can be generated by a
mechanical pulse, such as given by ultrasound equipment, or by mechanical
impact, as in the impact echo technique. Crack penetration depth is determined
assuming a particular wave propagation path.
Although there are other techniques available to measure crack geometric
characteristics, the use of ultrasound with the time-of-flight refraction technique
is very simple, easy to perform, and gives a rapid indication of the extension of
cracking. Crack depth estimation by the time-of-flight diffraction technique using
conventional ultrasound equipment can be performed assuming a direct travel
path of the stress wave from the transmitter transducer to the receiver
transducer, passing through the crack tip. The transducers are placed on
opposite sides of the crack.
Graphically-based methods to estimate crack depth:
The transducers are placed in locations equidistantly from the surface
opening crack along a chosen line at least four positions. Time of-flight readings
are performed at each transducer arrangement. Assuming the same ultrasonic
pulse velocity in all wave travel paths, the time-of-flight can be expressed by:
Indirect UPV Technique has been used to measure the depth of the crack.
At first we calibrate the UPV setup
Later the stepped beam member is cleaned and it is ensured that the
surface on which the probe is placed is as flat as possible.
The top surface of the beam is then divided into number of intervals.
The transmitter is then placed on one side of the crack on the top surface
and the receiver is placed at different points on the other side of the crack.
The time taken is measured at the different points.
From the above values we can estimate the depth of the crack.
The crack is represented by the rectangular shape and the circles represents the
points of measurement. They are 6cm apart. The observed crack depth is around
14cm.
NODES
TIME(us)
a-a
b-b
c-c
138
146
272
GROUP 6 RESULTS:
Depth of
crack(cm)
25.41
17.53
42.11
Error:
44.9%
19%
67%
6
12.3
17.6
6.2
12.6
7
12.8
18.5
18.5
18.5
Time
taken(us)
122
145.6
272.6
165.4
186.1
Crack
depth(cm)
20.51
17.42
45.12
22.23
27.25
Error%
31.7
19.62
68.9
37
48.6
5.
IMPACT ECHO FOR THE SLAB WITH
FLAWS
Introduction:
Impact-echo is an acoustic method for non-destructive evaluation of concrete
and masonry.
We have used German made setup containing HP laptop installed with Viking
software
It just identifies and quantifies problems with in a structure but is not a 100%
sure shot black box which testifies an issue inside.
Its based on the use of impact-generated stress (sound) waves that propagate
through concrete and masonry and are reflected by internal flaws and external
surfaces.Impact-echo can be used to determine the location and extent of flaws
such as cracks, de-laminations, voids, honeycombing, and de-bonding in plain,
reinforced, and post-tensioned concrete structures.It can provide thickness
measurements of concrete slabs with an accuracy better than three percent, and
it can locate voids in the subgrade directly beneath slabs and pavements. The
method can be used to determine thickness or to locate cracks, voids, and other
defects in masonry structures where the brick or block units are bonded together
with mortar.
Principle:
It works on the basis of reflection of waves on interaction with a different
medium in its path. On interaction with a new medium, wave gets both diffracted
and reflected. This reflected wave is caught back again in receiver and the time
gap is measured which gives the distance of flaw/other material from the
transmitter based on pre-defined calibrated velocities in that medium.
Experimental Description:
All the necessary connections for using the Viking software was done initially and
then with the help of Hammer of medium size is used as impact generator or
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Depth
A
321
298
321
379
321
298
379
RM
RM = Record
Missing; All values
in mm
B
155
379
379
97
99
298
99
RM
C
321
321
379
321
298
298
321
RM
D
464
102
379
379
379
298
99
RM
E
321
99
298
279
321
321
RM
RM
F
321
321
298
298
321
99
RM
RM
G
155
116
379
298
379
379
RM
RM
H
321
278
348
298
99
278
RM
RM
Analysis:
Velocity in concrete slab is 4074 m/s which is calibrated using Tomography. It can
also be calibrated using Impact Echo Method however Tomography was used in
time-constraint situations.
Based on the values obtained on the graph which are calculated form
calibrated velocity, it is clearly evident that points B4, B5, D2, D7, E2,
F6, G2, H5 are deviating from the trend implying that they could be
points of flaws in the beam.
Values crossing 350mm are being considered as erroneous as the beam depth is
250mm and this method cant give such deviation from the actual value.
Out of these D2, G2, E2 are along the same line implying that the crack
is along the lines joining all these three points at an approximate depth
of 100mm from surface of measurement.
B4 and B5 gives a scope of flaw at a depth of average 98mm from the
measuring surface.
D7, F6 and H5 makes an interpretation of angled crack that propagates
below these points at an average depth of 99mm from surface.
6.
Ultrasonic Tomography
Introduction:
Ultrasonic tomography uses ultrasound frequency of waves that gets attenuated
on interaction with media change with different di-electric constant.It gives an
overall estimation of what type of material is present inside any testing surface.
Principle:
The attenuation of the ultrasound as it passes through the object can be
measured and allowing estimation of both the attenuation constant and
the index of refraction. More or less, it has its working principle very similar to
Impact Echo Testing but it uses ultrasound waves in the place of P and S waves
generated by impact.
Experiment procedure:
Initially, the surface on which this experiment is carried out is cleaned and made
sure that the surface remains flat. Now the faces which are opposite to each
other are marked as shown in the diagram and made sure that they point on
both faces exactly opposite to each other.The recorded readings are then fed into
the software and the processing is done to obtain the velocity map and the
location of the flaw is identified.
Experimental data:
Result:
The analysis is to find out the velocity across various paths and its clearly
indicated in the tables.
Actual velocity of sound waves in concrete as measured by tomography is 4074
m/s and now this is compared with the data analysed from experiment.
Time(microsecon Width of
d)
specimen(cm)
velocity(Km/
s)
B1
101.7
46
4.52
B2
102
46
4.50
B3
102
46
4.50
C1
131.8
61
4.62
C2
132.7
61
4.59
C3
132.5
61
4.60
D1
165
76
4.60
D2
164.3
76
4.62
D3
165.3
76
4.59
Ultrasonic pulse
velocity equipment is used in the stepped beams by direct ,in direct,semi direct
method.(group 7).
DIRECT METHOD:
Time(micro second)
15
15
15
Velocity(Km/s)
4.38
4.5
4.477
35
67.5
106.5
specimen(cm)
Velocity(Km/s)
4.78
4.8
4.65
Note: The distance given here for semi- direct measurement is the
actual distance between the transmitter and receiver points that is
calculated from the right angled triangle knowing the length and
thickness of the beam.hence it can be directly used for the calculation
of pluse velocity.
In direct method:
Time(microsecond)
15
30
45
Velocity(Km/s)
3.8
3.1
2.97