BEFORE THE ADJUDICATING OFFICER

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA

ADJUDICATION ORDER NO. VKV/DL/AO-58/2016
UNDER SECTION 15-I OF SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ACT, 1992
READ WITH RULE 5 OF SEBI (PROCEDURE FOR HOLDING INQUIRY AND IMPOSING
PENALTIES BY ADJUDICATING OFFICER) RULES, 1995
In respect of:
M/s Jindal Stainless Ltd
(PAN- AABCJ1969M)
O.P. JINDAL MARG, HISAR
Haryana-125005
In the matter of Non-redressal of investor grievance(s)
BACKGROUND
1. Securities and Exchange Board of India (hereinafter referred to as "SEBI") came out with
a Circular dated June 03, 2011 dealing with the processing of investor complaints against
listed companies through SEBI Complaints Redress System (hereinafter referred to as
"SCORES"). In terms of said Circular, all listed companies were inter alia required to view
the complaints pending against them, redress them and submit Action Taken Reports
(hereinafter referred to as "ATRs") electronically in SCORES. As the SCORES is online
electronic system, therefore, for the purposes of accessing the complaints of the investors
against them, as uploaded in the SCORES, listed companies were required to login to
SCORES system electronically through a company specific user id and password, to be
provided by SEBI. For the purpose of generating said user id and password, listed
companies which were yet to obtain SCORES user id and password, were required to
submit the details for authentication to SEBI, in the format annexed to the said Circular.
However, it was observed that M/s Jindal Stainless Ltd (hereinafter referred to as
"Noticee/the Company") did not submit the details to SEBI which were required to be
furnished in terms of the said Circular.

Adjudication order in respect of M/s Jindal Stainless Ltd

Page 1 of 6

March 03, 2016

2. As observed from the contents of the Circular, SCORES introduced electronic dealing of
the complaints of the investors, by the respective companies. Thus, once a complaint
against a company was uploaded by SEBI in the SCORES, it amounted to calling upon by
SEBI to such company to redress the investor grievance. Accordingly, it was incumbent
upon such company to redress the investor complaint. It was observed that one (01)
investor complaint was pending against the Noticee as on July 22, 2012.
3. It was alleged that by not submitting the details for authentication as required by the
Circular, Noticee did not obtain the user id and password which was essential for
accessing the complaints pertaining to it, as uploaded on the SCORES for redressing the
investors grievances and subsequent redressal thereof, within specified time. Thus, it
was alleged that Noticee had failed to redress the investor grievances which renders the
Noticee liable for imposition of penalty under Section 15C of the Securities and Exchange
Board of India Act, 1992 (hereinafter referred to as 'SEBI Act').
APPOINTMENT OF ADJUDICATING OFFICER
4. Shri Ram Mohan Rao was appointed as the Adjudicating Officer vide order dated August
22, 2012 under section 15-I of SEBI Act and Rule 3 of SEBI (Procedure for Holding Inquiry
and Imposing Penalties by Adjudicating Officer) Rules, 1995 (hereinafter referred to as
Adjudication Rules) to inquire and adjudge under Section 15C of the SEBI Act, 1992,
the alleged violations committed by the Noticee. Subsequent to the transfer of Shri Ram
Mohan Rao, the undersigned was appointed as Adjudicating Officer vide order dated June
25, 2013.
SHOW CAUSE NOTICE, REPLY AND HEARING
5.

A Show Cause Notice (herein after referred to as SCN) was issued to the Noticee in
terms of the provisions of Rule 4(1) of SEBI (Procedure for Holding Inquiry and

Adjudication order in respect of M/s Jindal Stainless Ltd

Page 2 of 6

March 03, 2016

Imposing Penalties by Adjudicating Officer) Rules, 1995 to show cause as to why an

inquiry be not held against it in terms of rule 4 of the Rules read with section 15I of
SEBI Act, 1992 and penalty be not imposed under section 15C of SEBI Act, 1992 for the
violations alleged to have been committed by the Noticee.
6.

find

from

the

records

that

the

aforesaid

SCN

bearing

No.

SEBI-

NRO/AO/VKV/DL/248/2016 dated February 02, 2016 was sent at the registered office
address of the Noticee at "O.P Jindal Marg, Hisar, Haryana-125005. The said SCN was
duly delivered to the Noticee through the Department of Post.
7.

Noticee vide e-mail dated February 12, 2016 had submitted its reply in the matter,
which inter alia stated as under:

8.

".....We have received total 20 investor complaints at SCORES so far, out of which 19
complaints have been resolved and disposed off at SCORES. Remaining 01
complaint has been resolved at our end: ATR has been submitted within the
stipulated time and reply to clarification has been also submitted.

We regularly view the complaints pending against our company, redress them and
submit ATR electronically in SCIORES well within the prescribed period of 30 days
of receipt of grievance.

In the interest of natural justice and in order to conduct an inquiry in terms of rule 4(3)
of the Adjudication Rules, the Noticee was granted an opportunity of personal hearing
Vide Hearing notice no: SEBI-NRO/OW/AO/VKV/DL/HN/346/2016 dated February
22, 2016 at SEBI-NRO, New Delhi on March 03, 2016. The said Notice of hearing was
duly served to the Noticee through the Department of Post.
PERSONAL HEARING

9.

On the scheduled date of personal hearing, Ms. Geetika Rohila appeared as Authorised
Representative (AR). During the hearing, the AR made the following submissions,
which inter alia, stated as under:

Adjudication order in respect of M/s Jindal Stainless Ltd

Page 3 of 6

March 03, 2016

..The AR reiterated the submission made vide letter dated February 12, 2016.
The AR also stated that we have duly complied all the grievances of the investors
on the SCORES and there is no complaint pending on SCORES as on date from our
end. Relevant annexures of SCORES website are enclosed herewith. ........

ISSUES FOR CONSIDERATION

10.

After perusal of the material available on record, I have the following issues for
consideration, viz.,
a) Whether the Noticee has failed to resolve investor grievances?
b) Whether the Noticee is liable for monetary penalty under Section 15C of the
SEBI Act, 1992?
c) What quantum of monetary penalty should be imposed on the Noticee taking
into consideration the factors mentioned in Section 15J of the SEBI Act, 1992?
FINDINGS

11.

On perusal of the material available on record and giving regard to the facts and
circumstances of the case, I record my findings hereunder.
ISSUE 1: Whether the Noticee has failed to resolve investor grievances?

12.

As already observed, SEBI introduced an online electronic system for resolution of

investor grievances, i.e., SCORES in 2011. For the purposes of accessing the complaints
of the investors against them, as uploaded in the SCORES, listed companies were
required to login to SCORES system electronically through a company specific user id
and password, to be provided by SEBI. In this regard, from the submissions of the
Noticee I note that it had provided details for authentication for SCORES user id &
password on 13.07.2011.

Adjudication order in respect of M/s Jindal Stainless Ltd

Page 4 of 6

March 03, 2016

13.

With regard one (01) pending investor complaint relating to Refund/Allotment/

Dividend/Transfer/ Bonus/Rights/ Redemption/Interest mentioned in the SCN, the
Noticee through its submissions contended that it had duly complied all the grievances
of the investors on the SCORES within the stipulated time Subsequently, OIAE-NRO
has also confirmed (screenshot of SCORES is present on record) that the Noticee had
obtained SCORES authentication and had resolved the pending investor grievance (as
mentioned in the SCN) within the stipulated time

14.

Since, the Noticee had obtained SCORES authentication and had taken necessary steps
of resolving the pending investor grievance(s); I hold that the allegation of not
resolving investor grievances, as alleged in the SCN, does not stand established.

ISSUE 2: Whether the Noticee is liable for monetary penalty under Section 15C
of the SEBI Act, 1992?
15.

The provisions of Section 15C of the SEBI Act, 1992, read as under:
15C Penalty for failure to redress investors' grievances: If any listed company or
any person who is registered as an intermediary, after having been called upon by the
Board in writing, to redress the grievances of investors, fails to redress such grievances
within the time specified by the Board, such company or intermediary shall be liable to a
penalty of one lakh rupees for each day during which such failure continues or one crore
rupees, whichever is less.

16.

Since the allegation against the Noticee of not resolving the investor grievance pending
against it has not been established; therefore, the Noticee is not liable for monetary
penalty under Section 15C of the SEBI Act, 1992.
ISSUE 3: What quantum of monetary penalty should be imposed on the Noticee
taking into consideration the factors mentioned in Section 15J of the SEBI Act,
1992?

Adjudication order in respect of M/s Jindal Stainless Ltd

Page 5 of 6

March 03, 2016

17.

Since, the Noticee is not liable for monetary penalty in the instant matter, this issue
deserves no consideration.

18.

In view of my findings noted in the preceding paragraphs, I hereby dispose of the

Adjudication Proceedings initiated against M/s Jindal Stainless Ltd vide Show Cause
Notice dated February 02, 2016.

19.

In terms of the provisions of Rule 6 of the SEBI (Procedure for Holding Inquiry and
Imposing Penalties by Adjudicating Officer) Rules 1995, copies of this order are being
sent to M/s Jindal Stainless Ltd and also to Securities and Exchange Board of India.

Date: March 03, 2016

Vijayant Kumar Verma

Place: New Delhi

Adjudicating Officer

Adjudication order in respect of M/s Jindal Stainless Ltd

Page 6 of 6

March 03, 2016