Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Pinatacan
AffairImpregnated then
abandoned C
Married another
18.
Diao
v.
Martinez
passed the bar but
failed in acquiring
required academic
qualifications
20. Collantes v.
Renomeron
irregular actuations
in the application of
registration Deeds
of Absolute Sale
1. Montecillo v.
Gica
C accused by R of
slander
Atty.
Del
Mar
(lawyer of C) was
able to win the case.
R appealed to CA
2. In re: Gutierrez
Lawyer; convicted
of
murder
and
sentenced
with
death
penaltychanged to RP; then
pardoned
3. Oronce v. CA
Flaminiano illegally took
dispute over a land possession of the property
aided by husband-lawyer
while case was pending
Atty: peacefully
4. De Ysasi v.
NLRC
Father and Son
Labor dispute; son
suffered ailments;
5. Pajares v. Abad
Santos
buy
and
sell
business.
Company sued C
for recovery of
money
1. In re: Lanuevo
Bar Confidant
Ramon
Galang:
passed because of
reevaluation
2. First Lepanto
Ceramic v. CA
BOI
affirmed
changes to registered
name of product
P: questions jurisdiction of
CA (should be SC EO 226)
Private R: Circular 1-9
resolved conflicts between
B.P.129 and Art of E.O. 226
3. In re: Cunanan
For those with inadequate
RA 972: passed and preparation;
the law is
admitted grade of 72 contrary to public interest
by increasing to 75
4. Choa v. Chiongson
Atty Quiroz assisted
in filing a groundless,
false suit against
Judge
P: R failed to divulge
that
they
were
neighbors
R: not acquainted;
complainant not of
good moral character
Canon 15: against groundless suit; nextdoor relationship not a ground for a
mandatory disqualification; should have
raised in an appropriate pleading not
filing an administrative case; FINED
(Quiroz) 5,000
5. Cosmos v. Lo Bu
Atty.
Busmante's
labor dispute; writ of answer to petition:
Private R was correct; conflicts execution
deny allegations,
resolved as C 1-9 effectively
Errand boy
repealed...; BOI appeals can now
be filed in CA
6. Gamalinda vs. C was held in
Alcantara
contempt for entering
J. Fernando & Atty. the disputed land
Lim
pending case. Atty
Unconstitutional:
1.Congress Case regarding loss Lim
moved
for
exceeded power; 2. establish of C land
execution- denied then
arbitrary method; 3. effects violate previous admin case filed urgent surrender
the Constitution;
was dismissed
of TCT-granted
WON acts of Atty.
correct
4.
Kuroda
v.
Jalandoni
Atty. Hussey and
Port in behalf of USA
7. JP Sons v. Lianga
Inc.
Collection
case:
judgment in favor of
P and D appealed
5. Omico Mining v.
Vallejos
Catolico: judge of
CFT:
return
10
certificates; payment
of his services
Judge:
GADALEJ
defendants default
R: notice of hearing
addressed to clerk of court
6.
People
v.
Villanueva
Malicious Mischief
Atty. Fule made an
appearance
during
trial
7. Dia-Anonuevo v.
Judge Bercasio
Municipal Judge
verify deed of sale,
advised C, interceded
in their behalf for
3500
8. De Guzman v.
Visayan
Rapid
Transit
P: hired to reduce
certain toll rates
Reasonable Compensation
R: P only administrative and
did not require high degree
of prof skills
R: services of P are
unsolicited
and
unauthorized
1. Santiago v. Fojas
C: R failed to answer
-FEUFA lost suit
complaint
-Fojas: counsel to
FEUFA (Santiago)
R: cured by filing motion
for reconsideration; futile c
Inexcusable negligence
Rule 15.05, Canon 15 (candid &
honest opinion on merits of case)
Rule 18.03, Canon 18 (not neglect)
REPRIMANDED
2.
Cantiller
v. C: gave money to R for the
Potenciano
case only for atty to
- ejectment case
withdrew services
withdrew
as
counsel, asked for R: done in good faith, little
time, hemorrhoids
more money
Case dismissed
Atty. Lim acted diligently for the cause
of his client in an honorable way. He
should be commended and not
condemned.
Lack of merit.
D accused of taking
rollo
of
Special
Proceedings, financial
report of C and court
order;
WON
guilty
of
malpractice and gross
misconduct