Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Article information:
Access to this document was granted through an Emerald subscription provided by emerald-srm:600462 []
For Authors
If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for
Authors service information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines
are available for all. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information.
The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available at
www.emeraldinsight.com/1757-6385.htm
Canonical
correlation
analysis
Peter Mazuruse
Harare Institute of Technology, Harare, Zimbabwe
179
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this paper was to construct a canonical correlation analysis (CCA) model for
the Zimbabwe stock exchange (ZSE). This paper analyses the impact of macroeconomic variables on
stock returns for the Zimbabwe Stock Exchange using the canonical correlation analysis (CCA).
Design/methodology/approach Data for the independent (macroeconomic) variables and
dependent variables (stock returns) were extracted from secondary sources for the period from January
1990 to December 2008. For each variable, 132 sets of data were collected. Eight top trading companies
at the ZSE were selected, and their monthly stock returns were calculated using monthly stock prices.
The independent variables include: consumer price index, money supply, treasury bills, exchange rate,
unemployment, mining and industrial index. The CCA was used to construct the CCA model for the
ZSE.
Findings Maximization of stock returns at the ZSE is mostly influenced by the changes in consumer
price index, money supply, exchange rate and treasury bills. The four macroeconomic variables greatly
affect the movement of stock prices which, in turn, affect stock returns. The stock returns for Hwange,
Barclays, Falcon, Ariston, Border, Caps and Bindura were significant in forming the CCA model.
Research limitations/implications During the research period, some companies delisted due to
economic hardships, and this reduced the sample size for stock returns for respective companies.
Practical implications The results from this research can be used by policymakers, stock market
regulators and the government to make informed decisions when crafting economic policies for the
country. The CCA model enables the stakeholders to identify the macroeconomic variables that play a
pivotal role in maximizing the strength of the relationship with stock returns.
Social implications Macroeconomic variables, such as consumer price index, inflation, etc.,
directly affect the livelihoods of the general populace. They also impact on the performance of
companies. The society can monitor economic trends and make the right decisions based on the current
trends of economic performance.
Originality/value This research opens a new dimension to the study of macroeconomic variables
and stock returns. Most studies carried out so far in Zimbabwe zeroed in on multiple regression as the
central methodology. No study has been done using the CCA as the main methodology.
Keywords Stock returns, Macroeconomic variables, Canonical correlation, Canonical variates,
Canonical loadings, Redundancy index
Paper type Research paper
1. Introduction
The study of macroeconomic variables and their impact on stock returns has been an
area of intense interest among academics, investors and stock market regulators since
the 1970s. The relationship between macroeconomic variables and stock returns affects
the valuation of securities and risk management. Because the inter-dependence of the
JEL classification C51, C61
JFEP
6,2
180
stock market and the real economy is very strong, it means that any movement in stock
prices directly affects the real economy. It is vital to determine what drives the volatility
of both the fixed-income securities and stock prices, as this can assist in predicting the
path of economic growth. For investors, volatility implies holding more securities in
portfolios so as to achieve diversification. That is why macroeconomists and finance
specialists are increasingly focusing on the relationship between macroeconomic
variables and stock returns. Researchers, such as Aftab (2000), Fazal etal (2001), Nishat
(2004), Shahaz (2006) and Sharma (2007), have extensively researched on the
relationship between macroeconomic variables and stock returns. The fundamental
differences from their findings are that they selected different types of variables in their
research. The number of variables they used also differed. The researchers concentrated
mostly on developed and emerging markets, ignoring developing markets like
Zimbabwe. Methodologies that were used were different, and conclusions that were
drawn somehow differed. This research seeks to broaden the subject to developing
markets like Zimbabwe. It seeks to consider those macroeconomic variables that
directly affect stock returns at the Zimbabwe Stock Exchange (ZSE). The canonical
correlation analysis (CCA) was used to analyse the data. This methodology is a complete
deviation from the multiple regression which is usually applied. Thus, the motive is to
determine the macroeconomic variable sensitivities to stock price movements at the
ZSE.
Since the formation of the ZSE in 1896 in Bulawayo, policymakers, stock market
regulators, investors and stock market analysts have relied on the supply and demand
model in pricing assets and calculating stock returns, disregarding other determinants
of stock returns like macroeconomic variables. Macroeconomic variables provide a
platform for a detailed analysis of stock returns because they influence the performance
of the overall economy. Probably a macroeconomic variable approach to stock market
returns may fill the gap being left by the supply and demand theory approach currently
in use. The results for the research can be used for decision-making.
The research seeks to unveil a working strategy for policymakers, investors and fund
managers on how best to structure investment portfolios for the maximization of stock
returns. It aims to come up with a prescription for the treatment of macroeconomic
variables so that they positively impact the stock market returns for the benefit of the
Zimbabwean economy. Thus, the research seeks to construct an optimization model for
ZSE using the CCA.
The theoretical and practical motivation for undertaking this research on stock
returns and stock market forces can be discussed as follows.
An efficiently operating stock market ensures economic growth and prosperity. It
helps in the diversification of domestic funds and their channelling into productive
investments. To achieve this, the stock market should have a significant relationship
with macroeconomic variables. Nowadays, the capital market has become a key element
of a market-based economy. It transfers the long-term funds from savers to borrowers of
capital, which is very essential for economic development. After globalization,
international capital markets are being integrated rapidly. This integration positively
affects economic growth by reducing the contagious effect of risk on financial assets.
A well-performing stock market positively affects economic activities through
growth, saving and the efficient allocation of investment. Such an economy attracts
foreign direct investment. The stock market can boost the confidence of savers by
providing domestic households with investment funds. The efficient market hypothesis
(EMH) suggests that all the relevant information to investors about profit maximization
is reflected through stock prices and macroeconomic variables (Chong, 2003). If EMH is
implemented in stock markets, the role of stock brokerage firms diminishes gradually.
The stock market plays the vital role of transferring funds from capital borrowers to
capital investors. This is very essential for economic growth. It increases liquidity of
financial assets and diversification of global risk. This enables investors to make wiser
investment decisions (Agrawalla, 2006).
The research also seeks to broaden research previously carried out on this subject.
Previous researchers concentrated mostly on developed and emerging markets, leaving
out developing markets like Zimbabwe. The methodologies used by previous
researchers concentrated on multiple regression analysis, ignoring other methodologies
such as the CCA. A research of this nature has practical implications on policymakers,
stock market regulators, investors and stock market analysts in Zimbabwe.
2. Literature review
The literature review is divided into two categories: the first review focuses on research
carried out on stock returns versus macroeconomic variables with the CCA as the
modelling tool. The second review focuses on general studies that were carried out on
the relationship between stock returns and macroeconomic variables using other
methodologies.
After 1986, the relationship between macroeconomic factors and stock returns was
extensively investigated. The findings from literature point to the existence of a
significant link between macroeconomic factors and stock returns in the countries
examined. Arnold (1996) applied CCA to explore the relationship between security
returns and economic factors in international settings, namely, the UK and the USA. The
CCA was applied in investigating a set of economic indicators that synthetically
influence security returns. The results showed that the CCA successfully links the stock
market and the economic factors. Azhar (2006) used the CCA, the principal components
analysis and the generalised least squares to determine the arbitrage pricing factors
in the Malaysian Stock Exchange. The CCA results suggest that macroeconomic
variables and stock market returns are significantly correlated at principal
component scores of the macroeconomic variables, namely, FECONI (0.4470),
FECON2 (0.3214) and FECON3 (0.7791). The results suggest that FECON1 represents
the macroeconomic variables such as the US exchange rate, the Singapore exchange rate
and Money supply (M2). The FECON2 represents macroeconomic variables such as
export, import, industrial index and gold production. FECON3 represents
macroeconomic variables such as oil prices (petroleum) and the Japanese exchange rate.
Sabetfar et al. (2011) carried out a study on the Tehran Stock Exchange (1991-1998).
They wanted to find out the common risk factors in the returns of non-oil-based stocks
in the Tehran Stock Exchange using the principal component analysis, the
cross-sectional regression and the CCA. The research results showed that the 13
macroeconomic variables which were used failed to fully explain excess returns of the
samples. All the 13 macroeconomic variables did not affect stock market returns.
Fan Fah et al. (2010) used the CCA to test the arbitrage pricing theory on the Tehran
Stock Exchange. Tests conducted using the principal component analysis showed that
at least one to three factors can explain the cross-section of expected returns in this
Canonical
correlation
analysis
181
JFEP
6,2
182
market. The results suggest that there are four groups of macroeconomic variables in
the test period (1991-2008) that affect stock returns. But the significance of these factors
was found to be inconsistent over time. In general, the findings document a weak
applicability of the arbitrage pricing theory in this market.
Vuyyuri (2005) investigated co-integration relationship and the causality between
the financial and real sectors of the Indian economy using monthly observations from
July 1992 to December 2002. The financial variables used were interest rate, inflation
rate, stock returns and industrial production (proxy for real economy). The augmented
Dickey Fuller and Phillips Perron unit root tests were applied to check for
stationarity. The Granger test showed unidirectional Granger cause between the
financial and the real sector of the economy.
Afzal (2011) carried out an empirical analysis of the relationship between
macroeconomic variables and stock prices in Bangladesh using co-integration and the
Granger causality test. The results suggest that co-integration exists between stock
prices with money supply values, M1 and M2, and inflation rate. This indicates the
existence of a long-run relationship between them. Unidirectional causality was found to
exist from the stock market to the exchange rate, M1 and M2. Cakmarh et al. (2010) found
that macroeconomic variables have useful information for predicting monthly US
excess stock returns and volatility over the period 1980-2005 using linear regression
models.
Chen et al. (1986) tested the multifactor model in the USA by using seven
macroeconomic variables. They found that consumption, oil prices and market index
were not priced by the financial market. However, industrial production, changes in risk
premium and twists in the yield curve were significant in explaining stock returns. Chen
(1991) performed the second study covering the USA. Research findings showed that
future market stock returns could be forecasted by interpreting macroeconomic
variables such as default spread, term spread, one-month treasury-bill rate, industrial
production growth rate and the dividend price ratio. Clare et al. (1994) investigated the
effect of 18 macroeconomic factors on stock returns in the UK. They found that oil prices,
retail price index, bank lending and corporate default risks were important risk factors
for the UK stock returns. Mukherjee and Naka (1995) used the vector error correction
approach to model the relationship between the Japanese stock returns and
macroeconomic variables. A co-integration relation was detected among stock prices
and the six macroeconomic variables, namely, exchange rate, long-term government
bond rate and call money rate. Gjrde and Saettem (1999) examined the causal relation
between stock returns and macroeconomic variables in Norway. Results showed that a
positive link exists between oil price, real activity and stock returns. However, the study
failed to show a significant relationship between stock returns and inflation.
A recent study by Flannery and Protopapadakis (2002) re-evaluated the effect of
some series announcements on stock returns. Among these series, six macroeconomic
variables, namely, balance of trade, housing starts, employment, consumer price index,
money supply and producer price index affected stock returns. On the other hand, two
popular measures of aggregate economic activity (real gross national product [GNP] and
industrial production) were not related to stock returns.
Bailey and Chung (1996) examined the impact of macroeconomic risks on the equity
market of Philippines. Findings of the study showed that financial fluctuations,
exchange rate movements, political changes and equity cannot explain Philippine stock
returns. Mokerjee and Qiao (1997) investigated the effect of macroeconomic variables on
the Singapore Stock Exchange market. Results suggest that stock prices co-integrated
with both measures of the money supply (M1 and M2) and aggregate foreign exchange
reserves. However, stock prices and exchange rates did not have a long-term
relationship. Ibrahim and Aziz (2003) investigated the relationship between stock prices
and industrial production, money supply, consumer price index and exchange rate in
Malaysia. Stock prices were found to share a positive long-run relationship with
industrial production and consumer price index. On the contrary, stock prices have a
negative association with money supply and the Ringgit exchange rate. Cheung and Ng
(1998) investigated the relationship between stock prices and some macroeconomic
factors, namely, real oil prices, total personal consumption, money supply (M1) and GNP
in Canada, Germany, Italy, Japan and the USA. Results showed that there is a long-run
co-movement between the selected macroeconomic variables and real stock market
prices. Billson and Hooper (2001) used value-weighted world market index and some
macroeconomic variables for explaining stock returns in selected emerging markets.
Findings showed that goods prices and real activity have limited ability to explain the
variation in return. Sharma et al. (2002) investigated the relationship between stock
prices and some macroeconomic factors in five Asian countries, namely, Indonesia,
Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore and Thailand. Results suggest that in the long run,
stock prices will be positively related to growth and output. In the short run, stock prices
are found to be functions of past current values of macroeconomic variables.
3. Research methodology
3.1 Data collection
The data used in this research were sourced from the Central Statistics Office, ZSE, Old
Mutual Asset Managers Zimbabwe (Private) Lt. and the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe.
Top trading companies (counters) were selected because there was delisting and listing
of companies during the period under study due to harsh economic conditions. Those
counters which remained listed during the period under study were considered because
they had enough sets of data needed for the research. The counters selected were
categorized into two groups, namely, the industrial and the mining. The industrial
group consists of Ariston Holding Limited (Ariston), Border Timbers Limited (Border),
Barclays Bank of Zimbabwe Limited (Barclay), CAFCA Limited (Cafca) and Caps
Holding Limited (Caps). The mining group consists of Bindura Nickel Corporation
Limited (Bindura), Falcon Gold Zimbabwe Limited (Falcon) and Hwange Colliery
Company Limited (Hwange). These were the top eight movers at the ZSE during the
study period, and they never delisted from ZSE.
The data collected from Central Statistics Office included: industrial and mining
indices, inflation rate, money supply rate and unemployment rate. Prior to 1993, the
Central Statistics Office produced a Consumer Price Index for high-income urban
families and another for low-income urban families. This was later revised with an
overall Consumer Price Index calculated from 1993 onwards. Because of hyperinflation
between 2005 and 2008, the research omitted data during that period. Data during that
period could distort the research findings. This was the reason for not considering the
period prior to 1994 in the study because the overall index is difficult to derive, given
that two indices were available. Data for money supply, exchange rate and interest rate
(91 days Treasury bill rate) were gathered from the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe. The
Canonical
correlation
analysis
183
JFEP
6,2
184
secondary data gathered have data on 12 cases, 11 time periods, for a total of 132
observations. The study combined data gathered through discussion, arbitration and
abstraction to shed light on the main theme of the problem being investigated. The CCA
was used to analyse the data. Data on stock returns were deduced from stock prices for
each counter. The return from buying and holding a stock depends on the price at the
time of purchase, holding period, total dividend payments received and price at the end
of the holding period. Given Pit, the price for the ith asset for month is t and dit is the
dividend paid to stock i in the tth month, then the rate of return for asset i in the tth month
is given by:
Rit
Pi(t1)
Pi(t1)
Pi(t1)
(3.1)
The equation (3.1) is the sum of the capital gain yield and dividend gain yield. Assuming
that investors have not declared any dividend on the exchange market, the cash
dividend declared is zero, and, as a result, the equation (3.1) is reduced to:
Rit
Pit Pi(t1)
Pi(t1)
(3.2)
Equation (3.2) was used to convert raw asset prices to the rate of return. The mean return
N
Rt,R, subtracted from Rit to get a zero return, and R was the
R calculated by 1 / N t1
adjusted return obtained from the transformation process.
3.2 Model building: the theory behind
3.2.1 CCA (hotelling). This is a multivariate technique of measuring the linear
relationship between two multidimensional variables. It can be thought of as multiple
multiple regression. It finds two bases, one for each variable that are optimal with
respect to correlations. At the same time, it finds the corresponding correlations. In other
words, it finds the two bases in which the correlation matrix between the variables is
diagonal and correlations on the diagonal are maximized. The dimensionality of these
new bases is equal to or less than the smallest dimensionality of the two sets of variables.
Mathematically:
Consider the following two equations:
W1 a11X1 a12X2 a1pXp
(3.3)
(3.4)
(3.5)
such that the correlation C2 between them is maximum. W2 and V2 are uncorrelated with
W1 and V1, i.e. the two sets of canonical variates are uncorrelated. This procedure is
continued until the mth set of canonical variates;
Canonical
correlation
analysis
185
(3.6)
JFEP
6,2
186
Maximize 1 Max Corr (V1, W1) Maximize 7 Max Corr (V7, W7)
Subject to
Var (V1) 1 Var (V7) 1
Var (W1) 1 Var (W7) 1
(3.7)
Table I.
The independent
variables redundancy
index calculations
Loadings
Canonical loadings
[Canonical loading]2
ER
M1
CPI
M3
TB
II
0.9265
0.8584
0.7156
0.51208
0.3662
0.1341
0.9931
0.9862
0.8549
0.7308
0.0100
0.001
0.5446
0.2965
Table II, the following can also be deduced: CR2 5.2926, Average 5.2926/7 0.6616
canonical R2 0.980576.
Redundancy Index 0.66160.9806 0.6487
From the calculations, it can be deduced that a redundancy index of 0.65 is high. This
implies that the amount of dependent variables variance being shared between the
independent variables is very significant. This redundancy analysis leads to the
conclusion that the first canonical function:
Max 1 Max Corr V1, W1
Subject to
Var (V1) 1
Var (W1) 1
Canonical
correlation
analysis
187
(3.8)
Loadings
CL
CL2
Hwang
Falcon
Caps
Cafca
Barclays
Border
Bindura
Ariston
0.9784
0.9573
0.9265
0.8584
0.7156
0.5121
0.3662
0.1341
0.9474
0.8976
0.8520
0.7259
0.6131
0.3759
0.9118
0.8314
Table II.
The dependent variable
redundancy index
calculations
JFEP
6,2
188
W1 and W2 have some similarities in the order in which the factors contribute to the
formation of the variate and, consequently, the canonical function (model). It means that
the first five independent variables, namely, CPI, M3, ER, U and M1 are significant in the
formation of the first canonical variate and the first canonical model. The dependent set
of variables, namely, Ariston, Border, Hwange, Caps and Barclays are the top movers in
terms of contribution to the variate and the canonical model. Canonical loadings and
cross-loadings are the most appropriate methods in interpreting because they are very
robust in instances of multi-collinearity.
4.3.2 Canonical loadings. [SAS output: correlations between the with variables and
their canonical variables].
The loadings for the independent variables are: money supply (99 per cent),
consumer price index (98 per cent), exchange rate (94 per cent), treasury bills (85 per
cent), unemployment (55 per cent), mining index (51 per cent) and industrial index (1 per
cent). These figures suggest that the first four macroeconomic variables greatly
influence the formation of the first variate W1, resulting in the first canonical correlation
model. Only the contributions of the mining and industrial indices contributions fall
below the average mark of 54.5 per cent (average cross loadings for the seven
macroeconomic variables). This implies that the two indices are insignificant. The
loadings for the dependent variables are: Hwange (98 per cent), Barclays (95 per cent),
Falcon (93 per cent), Ariston (91 per cent), Border (85 per cent), Caps (72 per cent),
Bindura (62 per cent) and Cafca (37 per cent). The most influential ones include: Hwange,
Barclays, Falcon, Ariston and Border because their loadings exceed the 79 per cent
average point. Analysis of other variates is no longer necessary because an overall
pattern has been deduced already.
4.3.3 Canonical cross-loadings. [SAS output: last two tables]. Again similar patterns
appear in the cross-loading values for M3 (98 per cent), CPI (97 per cent), ER (93 per cent) and
TB (85 per cent). These figures support conclusions that were drawn earlier. If the
corresponding correlation values are squared, the percentage of the variance being
explained by the canonical variates is obtained. The values are: M3 (97 per cent), CPI (94 per
cent), ER (87 per cent), TB (72 per cent), U (29 per cent), MI (26 per cent) and II (0 per cent).
Hwange (97 per cent), Barclays (94 per cent), Falcon (92 per cent), Ariston (90 per cent),
Border (84 per cent), Caps (71 per cent), Bindura (61 per cent) and Cafca (36 per cent). The
squared values render Bindura and Cafca insignificant.
4.3.4 Overall model fitting. From the analysis above, W1 (money supply, consumer
price index, exchange rate and treasury bills) contribute significantly in maximizing
stock returns at ZSE. Thus, they should be incorporated into the final CCA model. When
developing the model, emphasis should be on the macroeconomic variables impact on
stock returns rather than the reverse. Thus, for the dependent variables, we include top
movers like V1 (Hwange, Barclays, Border, Caps, Ariston, Bindura and Falcon).
The specific model with regards to the research findings is given by:
Maximize 1 Maximize Corr (V1, W1)
Subject to
Var (V1) 1
Var (W1) 1
(3.9)
where V1 stock returns for Hwange, Barclays, Border, Caps, Ariston, Bindura, Falcon.
Canonical
correlation
analysis
(4.0)
4.4.5 Model validation and diagnosis. The last stage involves validating the prescribed
model through sensitivity analysis. The canonical loadings are examined for stability of
the model fitted. Individual values for the independent variables are deleted from the
analysis. The results obtained after omitting one value from each of money supply,
unemployment and exchange rate show little or no significant changes of the weights,
loadings and cross-loadings. This implies that the fitted model is very significant even
if the population is changed.
5. Conclusion
From the research results, the following were found: CCA identifies dimensions among
stock returns and macroeconomic variables that maximize the relationship between the
dimensions. Through CCA, the research managed to find the strength of the relationship
between macroeconomic variables and stock returns for the Zimbabwe economy during
harsh economic conditions. A fairly good model was fitted because a redundancy
index of 0.68 is very high (for a comparable multiple regression). This means that the
variance of stock returns that is being accounted for by the macroeconomic variables is
also high.
Five major macroeconomic variables, namely, money supply, treasury bills,
exchange rate, consumer price index and unemployment were found to be significant in
maximizing stock returns at ZSE. Mining index and industrial production were rejected.
Thus, a general CCA model was found that can be used by ZSE upon further scrutiny.
The model constructed can be used for prediction purposes. Thus, the model can be used
by traders at ZSE, economic regulators and the government to manage portfolios. The
model gives insight into what macroeconomic factors to closely monitor for portfolios at
ZSE to yield maximum stock returns during an economic meltdown like what the
country experienced between 1990 and 2008.
6. Practical implications and future research guide lines
Investors and stock market regulators can use the canonical correlation model to
monitor macroeconomic trends because they affect stock price movements. New
investors can have an insight of areas of investment. They can monitor the performance
of some companies in similar types of business. The research results can assist the
government in crafting economic policies for the country based on the listed stocks
reaction to movements of the macroeconomic variables. The CCA results enable
policymakers to simultaneously predict multiple stock returns from multiple
macroeconomic variables.
This research is limited to top trading counters and selected macroeconomic
variables during the research period at ZSE. Future researchers may include all the
listed companies as well as more macroeconomic variables into the model so that a
189
JFEP
6,2
190
broader view of ZSE is envisaged. There may be a need to incorporate other modelling
techniques such as the principal components analysis and factor analysis to
complement the CCA. For example, factor analysis can be considered with the intention
of discussing scale development. The CCA is a form of scale development. The
dependent and independent variates represent dimensions of the variable sets similar to
the relationship between them. But factor analysis maximizes the explanation (shared
variate) of the variable set. The results of the CCA model show a set of stock returns and
a set of macroeconomic variables being correlated. These two sets of variables can be
used to develop a multidimensional regression model for the ZSE. This is a matrix of all
regression models for each company and provides another dimension of analyzing the
stock market using multiple models.
References
Alpert, M.I. and Robert, A.P. (1972), On the interpretation of canonical analysis, Journal of
Marketing Research, University of Texas, Austin, TX, Vol. 9 No. 5, pp. 187-192.
Alpert, M.I., Robert, A.P. and Warren, S.M. (1975), Testing the significance of canonical
correlations, Proceedings of the American Marketing Association, University of Texas,
Austin, TX, Vol. 37, pp. 117-119.
Aftab (2000), Impact of macroeconomic variables on stock prices: empirical evidence in case of
KSE, Vol. 38, pp. 96-103.
Afzal, N. and Hossain, S.S. (2011), An analysis of the relationship between macroeconomic
variables and stock prices, Bangladesh Development Studies, Vol. 34 No. 5 pp. 95-105.
Agrawalla, R.K. and Tuteja, S.K. (2006), Causality between stock market development and
economic growth, a case study of India, Journal of Management Research, Vol. 7 No. 3
pp. 158-168.
Arnold, M.E. (1996), The relationship of canonical correlation analysis to other parametric
methods, Annual Meeting of South West Education Research Association January.
Azhar (2006), Working capital management: the effect of market valuation and profitability in
Malaysia, International Journal of Business and Management, Vol. 5 No. 11 pp. 140-1476.
Bailey, W. and Chung, Y.P. (1996), Risk and returns in the Phillipine equity market; a multifactor
exploration, Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Vol. 4 Nos. 2/3, pp. 197-218.
Barlett, M.S. (1941), The statistical significance of canonical correlations, Biometrika, Vol. 32,
p. 29.
Billson, C.M., Brailsford, T.J. and Hooper, V.J. (2001), Selecting macroeconomic variables as
explanatory factors of emerging stock market returns, Pacific-Basin Finance Journal,
Vol. 9 No. 4, pp. 401-426.
Breen, W.J., Glosten, L.R. and Jagannathan, R. (1989), Economic significance of predictable
variation in stock index returns, Journal of Finance, Vol. 44, pp. 1177-1190.
Chen (1991), Financial investment opportunities and the macroeconomic, Journal of Finance,
Vol. 46, pp. 529-554.
Chen, N.R. (1986), Economic forces and stock market, Journal of Business, Vol. 59, pp. 383-403.
Chong (2003), Linkages of economic activity, stock prices and monetary policy, The Case of
Malaysia.
Cheng, Y.-W. and Ng, L.K. (1998), International evidence on the stock market and aggregate
economic activity, Journal of Empirical Finance, Vol. 5, pp. 281-296.
Fama, E.F. and French, K.R. (1989), Business conditions and the expected returns on stocks and
bonds, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 25, pp. 23-49.
Fan Fah, C., et al. (2010), Factors correlated with Treasury bond spreads in an emerging capital
market, International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, Vol. 1 No. 5.
Ferson, W.E and Harrvey, C.R. (1999), Conditioning variables and the cross-section of stock
returns, Journal of Finance.
Flannery, M.J. and Protopapadakis, R.H. (2002), Macroeconomic factors do influence aggregate
stock returns, Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 15 No. 3, pp. 751-782.
Gjrde, . and Saetten, F. (1999), Causal relation among stock returns and macroeconomic
variables in a small,open economy, Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions
and Money, Vol. 9, pp. 61-74.
Granger, C.W.J., Huang, B.-N. and Chin-Wei, Y. (2000), A bivariate causality between stock prices
and exchange rates: evidence from recent Asian flu, The Quarterly Review of Economics
and Finance, Vol. 40, pp. 337-354.
Ibrahim, M.H. and Aziz, H. (2003), Macroeconomic variables and the Malaysian equity market,
A View Theory Rolling Subsample, Journal of Economic Studies, Vol. 30, pp. 6-27.
Lambert, Z. and Durand, R. (1975), Some precautions in using canonical analysis, Journal of
Marketing Research, Vol. 12, pp. 468-475.
Mukherjee, T.K. and Naka, A. (1995), Dynamic relations between macroeconomic variables and
the Japanese stock market: an application of a vector error correlation model, A Journal of
Financial Research, Vol. 18, pp. 223-237.
Mokerjee, R. and Qiao, Y. (1997), Macroeconomic variables and stock prices in a small open
economy: the case of Singapore, Pacific Basin Finance Journal, Vol. 5, pp. 377-388.
Nieh, C.-C. and Lee, C.-F. (2001), Dynamic relationship between stock prices and exchange rates
for G-7 countries, The Quarterly Review of Economic and Finance, Vol. 41, pp. 477-490.
Nishat (2004), Macroeconomic variables and the Pakistan equity market, retrieved by May 2004.
Roll, R. and Ross, S. (1980), An empirical investigation of the arbitrage pricing theory, A Journal
of Finance, Vol. 35, pp. 1073-1103.
Sabetfar, P., Fan Fah, C. and Mohd, S. (2011), Common risk factors in the returns of non-oil based
stocks in Tehran stock exchange. The case of closed economy, African Journal of Business
Management, Vol. 6, pp. 7520-7528.
Shahaz, M., Ahmed, N. and Ali, L. (2006), Stock market development and economic growth: Ardl
causality in Pakistan, International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, No. 14.
Sharma, J., Buckle, R.A., Kim, K., Kirkham, H. and McLellan, N. (2002), A Structural VAR Model
of the New Zealand Business Cycle.
Sharp, W.F. (1964), Capital asset prices: a theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk,
A Journal of Finance, Vol. 19, pp. 425-442.
Stewart, D. and Love, W. (1968), A general canonical correlation index, Psychological Bulletin,
Vol. 70, pp. 160-163.
Further reading
Chen, N.C. and Ross, S.A., Economic forces and the stock market, Journal of Business, Vol. 46,
pp. 529-554.
Canonical
correlation
analysis
191
JFEP
6,2
192
Table AI.
Appendix
Tables on canonical correlation analysis and SAS output
Canonical
correlation
analysis
193
Table AII.
JFEP
6,2
194
Table AIII.
Canonical
correlation
analysis
195
Table AIV.
JFEP
6,2
196
Table AV.
Corresponding author
Peter Mazuruse can be contacted at: pgmazuruse@gmail.com