Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Date: 28/04/15
Length: ~ 60 min
The class meets every day for 4 hours and the course is 10 weeks long. This is the
first time that students are doing an academic English class having studied general
English before this level. The course objectives are to develop academic skills. The
assessments are both exam based and internal assessments such as writing
comparative essays, argument essays and seminars. In addition, the classes involve
discussion and group work and task based assignments.
The motivation to do well and achieve a passing mark of 50% and move to the
second level of academic English is common to all.
Thangmak Nayada,
20,Thai (F)
5 weeks
Strengths
Weaknesses
Other comments
to improve language
skills
10 weeks
pathway program to
Curtin University
10 weeks
pathway program to
Curtin University
collocations, simple
vocabulary
10 weeks
to improve language
skills
10 weeks
pathway program to
Curtin University
10 weeks
to improve language
skills
participates well/positive
10 weeks
to improve language
skills
10 weeks
pathway program to
Curtin University
basic grammar
errors/simple
sentences/plural forms
Nguyen Phuong
Thao, 20,
Vietnamese (F)
Zhang Yawen,
Anahy, 19, Chinese
(F)
Name,
Age,
Nationality
10 weeks
Le Cong Hanh,22,
Vietnamese (M)
Strengths
Weaknesses
Other comments
pathway program to
Curtin University
hardworking, needs
prompting
10 weeks
pathway program to
Curtin University
collocations
cheerful, outspoken
10 weeks
pathway program to
Curtin University
Chen Zhenpeng
Gary, 22, Chinese
(M)
10 weeks
pathway program to
Curtin University
organisation of ideas
10 weeks
pathway program to
Curtin University
enthusiastic, participates
well
Lyn/Huynh Dieu Y,
25, Vietnamese (F)
10 weeks
pathway program to
Curtin University
collocations, simple
vocabulary
weak/shy/pronunciation
issues
10 weeks
pathway program to
Curtin University
outspoken/confident
Irene/Eng Li Ting,
24, Malaysian (F)
10 weeks
pathway program to
Curtin University
plural forms/collocations
Aims:
a) Main aims:
1. To test students existing range of language of comparison
2. To teach some new structures to compare things, people or actions
3. To give written controlled practice in the new structures taught
4. To give free oral practice in the new structures taught if time permits
b) Subsidiary aims:
1. Vocabulary related to the theme of superheroes (costume, mask, suit/armour,
powers, power glove, green-skinned monster)
Learning outcomes:
By end of this lesson, students will
Assumptions:
Students are familiar with the concept of compare and contrast / similarities
and differences
Potential problems
Students are not familiar with the concept
of similarities and differences
Students are unable to come up with a
variety of structures in the test stage
Students come up with a variety of
structures and leave little room for
expansion of their knowledge
Students are not familiar with the
characters chosen for comparison
Possible solutions
Use a Venn Diagram and explain the concept with
a simple example of two countries say China and
Singapore
It implies a low range of student knowledge so I
will teach at least 5 new ones
Leverage the situation to teach some advanced
structures and give practice for the existing ones
to ensure all students have equal confidence in
using them
provide a simple alternative such as Batman and
Superman
Using the board well so students have a clear written record of language
Using appropriate material to give controlled and free practice which allows
students to check their understanding
Language analysis:
Possible structures (Swan, 2005: 110-115; Parrott, 2000: 75) that students may use
or be taught:
No.
Like A, B + verb
A +verb + as + adverb + as + B
A is/was + as + adjective + as + B
A + verb, as + B + verb
A + is/was + similar to + B
A + verb, but/while/whereas B +
(negative) verb
10
11
Unlike A, B + verb
12
/z/
/z/
/z/
/z/
In terms of phonology, most of the comparative phrases show weak forms of as,
and than while the stress is seen on the elements being compared.
Timetable fit:
The lesson before this is a listening lesson on the theme of healthy lifestyles.
It later focuses on paragraph structure and development of ideas using a
reading exercise on the same theme of healthy lifestyles.
The observed lesson has a different focus- language of comparison. This
would lay a foundation for the upcoming assessment on comparative essays.
The following lesson can combine the language aspect just taught with
paragraph structure to get students to write a paragraph comparing two
objects.
Commentary:
My rationale for selecting language of comparison for this lesson
This lesson takes place in the second week of the course which focuses on
paragraph structure. The following week starts input for the first assessment
Compare-Contrast essays. Therefore, this lesson on language for comparing would
fit in well at this stage so students can combine sentence level tasks with paragraph
and essay writing components.
In the school course material, there is no explicit focus on language for comparing. In
spite of providing models of comparative essays, students overuse a small set of
structures. This limits their ability to express their ideas clearly and achieve the
desired impact on readers. Therefore, doing a lesson to assess their repertoire of
comparative structures and expanding their range would benefit learners
considerably.
In addition, I have used the TestTeachTest approach rather than a PPP or a
Discovery approach. The main reason for this is that many students in this class are
new and I am not aware of their existing range and ability in writing comparative
sentences. On the other hand, some students have moved up from a GE(Pre-Int)
class and may already be familiar with some structures. Following this approach
might get them to recall and connect new information in this lesson with their existing
knowledge. Overall, it would push students to notice linguistic features in the
language taught and learn better.
I have used the topical theme of superheroes and the latest movie release Avengers
as I think this would engage students better. Using their own ideas to teach additional
structures personalises the lesson further. Using group work and student involvement
in boarding up sentences and analysis of form makes the lesson student centred.
In the Presentation stage using student generated language for analysis, I aim to
focus on the range of language rather than accuracy of existing knowledge of
structures. Hence, I do not intend to overtly correct errors as much as draw student
attention to new language of comparing which can be used to convey the same
meaning. I plan to teach by contrasting student production and the new alternative
form that could be used to express the same or similar idea/meaning. I also intend to
provide prompts and elicit new forms so students are engaged and involved in the
language taught. In this way, I intend to get students to notice the gap as well as
pay attention to linguistic features in the input.
Providing controlled written practice in the form of sentence completion would
consolidate the form and give students confidence to approach the free practice task.
However, I want to use this as a flexi stage and will probably go straight to the free
production stage. Getting students to verbalise their thoughts freely provides a
change of pace and adds variety after a writing task though it might prove
challenging for some.
Doing a feedback and consolidation allows for clarification and an opportunity for
students to take notes as also to extend their knowledge further.
Seating Chart
Board
Cathy -
Lyn -
Michael -
Heng -
Gary ~
Huan
Key ~
Anahy ~
Thao ~
Care +
Rock +
Hanh +
Tham +
Dang +
Albert +
Quang +
Irene +
Student Ability:
+ Strong
~ Fair
- Weak
_________________________________________________________________
Board Plan
To talk about
Similarities
1. aspect
a. Student Production
b. New way with prompts and
linguistic feature highlighted
Differences
Procedure
Stage
1.
2.
Lead-in
Test Stage 1
Stage Aims
To set context
To check ss concept
of compare/contrast
3. Test Stage 2
4. Teach/Presentation
To check ss
knowledge and
existing range of
structures
To provide error
correction for any
mistakes and to teach
new structures not
used yet
Procedure
Time
2 min
8 min
10 min
15 min
Interaction
T-ss
ss-T
T-ss
ss-ss
ss-ss
T-ss
T-ss
5. Controlled practice
(Flexi Stage)
6. Free Practice
(spoken)
To give controlled
practice in structures
reviewed and taught
10 min
ss-ss
T-ss
compare (worksheet 3)
2. Students work in pairs to come up with sentences orally
3. Students write up sentences on plastic sheets using new
10 min
language taught
ss-ss
ss-T
7. Feedback
(Receptive stage with
consolidation)
10 min
ss-T-ss
10
References
Murphy, R. (2004). English Grammar in Use, 3rd Ed. Cambridge, Cambridge
University Press.
Parrott, M. (2000). Grammar for English language teachers. Cambridge, Cambridge
University Press.
11
Appendix
12
Worksheet 1
Write your points of similarities and differences between Hulk and
ironman in the diagram below
Hulk
Ironman
Using the points in the diagram above, write your sentences to compare
Hulk and Ironman below
Worksheet 2
13
Practice
1. Choose the correct word or phrase underlined in each sentence.
a) The fish was so tasty as/as tasty as the meat.
b) This book is the most interesting/the more interesting Ive ever read.
c) This temple is the eldest/oldest in Europe.
d) That dress is a lot longer than/that the other one.
e) Nothing is worse/worst than being stuck in a traffic jam.
comfortable fast
long
often quietly
soon well
Adapted from Murphy, R., (2004), English Grammar in Use, 3rd Ed, (Unit107), Cambridge University Press .
Worksheet 3
14
Catwoman
Black widow
Using the points in the diagram above, write your sentences to compare
Catwoman and Black Widow below and then on the plastic sheet given
to you.
15