Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
At the end of 2001, it was revealed that its reported financial condition was
sustained by an institutionalized, systematic, and creatively planned accounting
fraud, known since as the Enron scandal. Enron has since become a well-known
example of willful corporate fraud and corruption. The scandal also brought into
question the accounting practices and activities of many corporations in the
United States and was a factor in the enactment of the SarbanesOxley Act of
2002. The scandal also affected the greater business world by causing the
dissolution of the Arthur Andersen accounting firm.[2]
Enron Media Services (risk management services for media content companies).
Customizable Bandwidth Solutions (bandwidth and fiber products trading).
Streaming Media Applications (live or on-demand Internet broadcasting
applications).
Energy and commodities services[edit]
Enron Power (electricity wholesaling).
Enron Natural Gas (natural gas wholesaling).
Enron Clean Fuels (biofuel wholesaling).
Enron Pulp and Paper, Packaging, and Lumber (risk management derivatives for
forest products industry).
Enron Coal and Emissions (coal wholesaling and CO2 offsets trading).
Enron Plastics and Petrochemicals (price risk management for polymers, olefins,
methanol, aromatics, and natural gas liquids).
Enron Weather Risk Management (Weather Derivatives).
Enron Steel (financial swap contracts and spot pricing for the steel industry).
Enron Crude Oil and Oil Products (petroleum hedging).
Enron Wind Power Services (wind turbine manufacturing and wind farm
operation).
MG Plc. (U.K. metals merchant).
Enron Energy Services (Selling services to industrial end users).
Enron International (operation of all overseas assets).
Capital and risk management services[edit]
Commercial and industrial outsourcing services[edit]
Commodity Management.
Energy Asset Management.
Energy Information Management.
Facility Management.
Capital Management.
Azurix Inc. (water utilities and infrastructure).
Project development and management services[edit]
Enron International[edit]
Enron International (EI) was Enron's wholesale asset development and asset
management business. Its primary emphasis was developing and building natural
gas power plants outside North America. Enron Engineering and Construction
Company (EECC) was a wholly owned subsidiary of Enron International, and built
almost all of Enron International's power plants. Unlike other business units of
Enron, Enron International had a strong cash flow on bankruptcy filing.[citation
needed] Enron International consisted of all of Enron's foreign power projects,
including ones in Europe.
The company's Teesside plant was one of the largest gas-fired power stations in
the world, built and operated by Enron from 1989, and produced 3 percent of the
United Kingdom's energy needs.[8][9] Enron owned half of the plant's equity,
with the remaining 50 per cent split between four regional electricity companies.
[9]
Management[edit]
Rebecca Mark was the CEO of Enron International until she resigned to manage
Enron's newly acquired water business, Azurix, during 1997. Mark had a major
role in the development of the Dabhol project in India, Enron's largest
international endeavor.[citation needed]
Projects[edit]
Enron International constructed power plants and pipelines across the globe.
Some are presently still operating, including the massive Teesside plant in
England. Others, like a barge-mounted plant off Puerto Plata in the Dominican
Republic, cost Enron money by lawsuits and investment losses.[citation needed]
Puerto Plata was a barge-mounted power plant next to the hotel Hotelero del
Atlantico. When the plant was activated, winds blew soot from the plant onto the
hotel guests' meals, blackening their food. The winds also blew garbage from
nearby slums into the plant's water-intake system. For some time the only
solution was to hire men who would row out and push the garbage away with
their paddles.[citation needed] Through mid-2000 the company collected a paltry
$3.5 million from a $95 million investment.[citation needed] Enron also had other
investment projects in Europe, South America, Argentina, Brazil, Bolivia,
Colombia, Mexico, Jamaica, Venezuela, and across the Caribbean.[citation
needed]
India[edit]
Around 1992 Indian experts came to the United States to find energy investors to
help with India's energy shortage problems.[citation needed] During December
1993, Enron finalized a 20-year power-purchase contract with the Maharashtra
State Electricity Board.[citation needed] The contract allowed Enron to construct
a massive 2,015 megawatt power plant on a remote volcanic bluff 100 miles (160
km) south of Mumbai. Construction would be completed in two phases, and Enron
would form the Dabhol Power Company to help manage the plant. The power
project was the first step in a $20 billion scheme to help rebuild and stabilize
India's power grid. Enron, GE (which was selling turbines to the project), and
Bechtel (which was actually constructing the plant), each contributed 10% equity.
[citation needed]
During 1996, when India's Congress Party was no longer in power, the Indian
government assessed the project as being excessively expensive and refused to
pay for the plant and stopped construction.[citation needed] The Maharashtra
State Electricity Board (MSEB), the local state-owned utility, was required by
contract to continue to pay Enron plant maintenance charges, even if no power
was purchased from the plant. The MSEB determined that it could not afford to
purchase the power (at Rs. 8 per unit kWh) charged by Enron. The plant operator
was unable to find alternate customers for Dabhol power due to the absence of a
free market in the regulated structure of utilities in India.[citation needed] From
1996 until Enron's bankruptcy during 2001 the company tried to revive the
project and revive interest in India's need for the power plant without success.
Project Summer[edit]
During the summer of 2001, Enron made an attempt to sell a number of Enron
International's assets, many of which were not sold. The public and media
believed it was unknown why Enron wanted to sell these assets, suspecting it was
because Enron was in need of cash.[10] Employees who worked with company
assets were told in 2000 [11] that Jeff Skilling believed that business assets were
an outdated means of company worth, and instead he wanted to build a
company based on "intellectual assets".