Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
The toolkit
for asssessing the
consistency
between
PAFs and OPs
Alberto Arroyo Schnell,
WWF
Lisbon, 24th Jan 2014
The Toolkit
27012014
The Toolkit
The Toolkit
Target audience
27012014
The Toolkit
The Toolkit
27012014
The Toolkit
The Toolkit
27012014
Funding opportunities in
OPs
Comments
Typesof
Activities
EstablishmentofNatura2000sites
Cat.
Further
description
Fundingfor
Administrationofauthorities
thesiteselection carryingoutthe
process
selection
process.
Scientific
studies/inventori
esforthe
identificationof
sites surveys,
inventories,
mapping,
condition
assessment
PAF priority
measures:
G-General
No. AF-Agriculture and
Forestry
MC-Marine and
Coastal
WET-Wetlands;
other
Identified
funding
source in
PAF
(EAFRD,
ERDF,
EMFF,
LIFE,
National,
)
EAFRD
ERDF/CF/
EMFF
ESF
level of
consistency:
(V)Very good
(Mo)Moderate
(Mi)Minor
(No)No
Scientificstudies,
research
personnel,
workshopsand
2
meetings,
creationof
databasesetc.
Including
handbooks,
Preparationof seminars,
initial
workshops,
3
informationand communication
publicitymaterial materialsfor
trainingand
capacitybuilding.
National Workshop on Financing
Natura 2000
Initialtrial
National Workshop
on Financing
Natura 2000
Pilotprojects
4
projects at sites.
The toolkit
Online platform
www.financing-natura2000.eu
27012014
The Toolkit
Examples
Aims to show successful approaches during the current period
(2007-2013).
Poland very good uptake of ERDF funds through a special
agency that coordinated the implementation process.
Austria very good uptake of EAFRD funds for diversification of
rural areas linked to biodiversity funding.
Alpine Space strong focus of biodiversity in Alpine region
shows how important integration of biodiversity is especially in
territorial dimension.
National Workshop on Financing Natura 2000
National Workshop on Financing Natura 2000
Muito obrigado
www.financingnatura2000.eu