Counter Plan For Corn Ethanol

c
22

ã

Strategy Notes:
Rounter-Plan Text:
%
%andate 2 End all Ethanol Subsidies
c : S
a
S
j V

.
ã c

Rounter-Plan %utual Exclusivity/Non Topicality
% a
V
ã

Rounter-Plan Rompetitiveness:!
2. Subsidies with mandates cause adverse interaction effects!
. Quantity-based biofuel mandate is superior to a price-based consumption
subsidy!
÷. Benefits of a market-based policy like mandates can easily be eradicated if
mandates are used in conjunction with biofuel subsidies"
Æ. Subsidizing ethanol may increase emissions"
Ý. With mandates in place, the tax credits will unintentionally subsidize gasoline
consumption instead#
V. The unintended result of a tax credit switching to a gasoline subsidy in the
presence of a government mandate is easily explained#
M. The additional revenues from the tax credit and the price of ethanol fail to
exceed the opportunity cost of production for any additional ethanol$
Rounter-Plan Solvency:%
2. Ethanol is profitable in spite of subsidies%
. Even without subsidies, ethanol production would be expanding at a significant
rate due to high gasoline prices and the improvements in ethanol production
technology in recent years%
%ore RP Rompetition (why Fossil fuels are bad&'
2
&'
2. Health Rosts of Fossil Fuels&'
. Largest portion is excess mortality&'

c
2

Strategy Notes:

(

)

*
+

)

, -

)

.

/

) (

0

1
c2V
/*

*
/
)

*3

3

3

3

0
415

46
4

4

1
72*

)8 + *

c
÷2

Rounter-Plan Text:
%
%andate 2 End all Ethanol Subsidies
c : S
a
S
j V

.
ã c

c
Æ2

Rounter-Plan %utual Exclusivity/Non Topicality

% a
,

(

9(

3
V
ã

c

)
: ;
3
3 #$$''!*/
/<

c
Ý2

Rounter-Plan Rompetitiveness:
2. Subsidies with mandates cause adverse interaction effects
Harry de Gorter, David R. Just, 2 ,

!
"## $!
%
&& & '()(
$**+, * *-'*)*. /&0

6*

)

/

) +

+

7

=

-
*
>

=
)

/

)

)

,*1)
/
?

. Quantity-based biofuel mandate is superior to a price-based consumption subsidy


!
"## $!
%
&& & '()(
$**+, * *-'*)*. /&0

61

>
/

/

)

1

)

) +

+
)

1
*

+)

S
* )

+

+

*

?

c
V2

÷. Benefits of a market-based policy like mandates can easily be eradicated if mandates
are used in conjunction with biofuel subsidies

!
"## $!
%
&& & '()(
$**+, * *-'*)*. /&0

6 )
/

8

-

+* )

)

)

?
Æ. Subsidizing ethanol may increase emissions


!
"## $!
%
&& & '()(
$**+, * *-'*)*. /&0

6c+

) 1

+

@

1

1

)
-

* -

A )

)1

+ >

*

S
+

+

)+

/

1
c )
+

+ ?

c
M2

Ý. With mandates in place, the tax credits will unintentionally subsidize gasoline
consumption instead

!
"## $!
%
&& & '()(
$**+, * *-'*)*. /&0

6

+

7 /

+

,
8
A
S

"

'*+

7

)+

-

*

@8

)

*

1/

?
V. The unintended result of a tax credit switching to a gasoline subsidy in the presence
of a government mandate is easily explained

!
"## $!
%
&& & '()(
$**+, * *-'*)*. /&0

6*

+

+

+ *

)

>
*

)

V

+

+
+

)

9
)

?

c
ë2

M. The additional revenues from the tax credit and the price of ethanol fail to exceed
the opportunity cost of production for any additional ethanol

!
"## $!
%
&& & '()(
$**+, * *-'*)*. /&0

6*

+

+

9
)

+

)

9
)

* )

)

7 )

)

* )

*

*

++

8 /

B

?

c
w2

Rounter-Plan Solvency:
2. Ethanol is profitable in spite of subsidies
Tom Elam, M!& & 1
"!

# & 22 3!/)45406 /)47(0
/)47-0
&
2!8+!9
& 1
8 32/)47'7.0: &
$
& :& ;;":& ;;"
%"%< /
" , 20

"&
32 3 '7'((7
$** * *&

='(='(&;6='(&>% &='(4'5(7/&0
6

S
)

)
9

)

)
9

)
)

)

?

. Even without subsidies, ethanol production would be expanding at a significant rate
due to high gasoline prices and the improvements in ethanol production technology
in recent years
Tom Elam, M!& & 1
"!

# & 22 3!/)45406 /)47(0
/)47-0
&
2!8+!9
& 1
8 32/)47'7.0: &
$
& :& ;;":& ;;"
%"%< /
" , 20

"&
32 3 '7'((7
$** * *&

='(='(&;6='(&>% &='(4'5(7/&0
6*

&%%'

+,

C&''
)

)

*

&%%'

7 C#!D
C''D

*
/

C

9

E

2

S

)

+

?

c
2 2

%ore RP Rompetition (why Fossil fuels are bad

2

2. Health Rosts of Fossil Fuels
6!! &<;<;:: 9 "%# 1?3!
@ )4'((4
$** *'((4*)(*'(* *
*'(
/&0
67

S
C&'

)

)V
c

F
* >
)

)
*

/

?

. Largest portion is excess mortality
6!! &<;<;:: 9 "%# 1?3!
@ )4'((4
$** *'((4*)(*'(* *
*'(
/&0
66*
+ B

)?6 ;
)

F
S

) V ')'''
)
( )
C"

'''*

)

=

+)
=
+)

?

Counter Plan For Corn Ethanol

Încărcat de

Informații document

Titlu original

Drepturi de autor

Formate disponibile

Partajați acest document

Partajați sau inserați document

Opțiuni de partajare

Vi se pare util acest document?

Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

Counter Plan For Corn Ethanol

Încărcat de

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

c

Rounter-Plan %utual Exclusivity/Non Topicality

$**+, * -')*. /&0

. Quantity-based biofuel mandate is superior to a price-based consumption subsidy

$**+, * -')*. /&0

$**+, * -')*. /&0

-

Æ. Subsidizing ethanol may increase emissions

$**+, * -')*. /&0

$**+, * -')*. /&0

$**+, * -')*. /&0

$**+, * -')*. /&0

$** &

9

$** &

%ore RP Rompetition (why Fossil fuels are bad

S-ar putea să vă placă și

Counter Plan For Corn Ethanol

Încărcat de

Informații document

Titlu original

Drepturi de autor

Formate disponibile

Partajați acest document

Partajați sau inserați document

Opțiuni de partajare

Vi se pare util acest document?

Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

Counter Plan For Corn Ethanol

Încărcat de

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

c 

Rounter-Plan %utual Exclusivity/Non Topicality

$**+,  *   *-'*)*. /&0

. Quantity-based biofuel mandate is superior to a price-based consumption subsidy

$**+,  *   *-'*)*. /&0

$**+,  *   *-'*)*. /&0

-  

Æ. Subsidizing ethanol may increase emissions

$**+,  *   *-'*)*. /&0

$**+,  *   *-'*)*. /&0

$**+,  *   *-'*)*. /&0

$**+,  *   *-'*)*. /&0

$**   *   *&

   9  

$**   *   *&

%ore RP Rompetition (why Fossil fuels are bad

S-ar putea să vă placă și

c

$**+, * -')*. /&0

. Quantity-based biofuel mandate is superior to a price-based consumption subsidy

$**+, * -')*. /&0

$**+, * -')*. /&0

-

Æ. Subsidizing ethanol may increase emissions

$**+, * -')*. /&0

$**+, * -')*. /&0

$**+, * -')*. /&0

$**+, * -')*. /&0

$** &

9

$** &