Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Progress towards a utopian society begins by addressing questions raised by
philosophers, political scientists and individuals. Glenn Tinder in Political Thinking raises
such questions needing reconciliation. When presented with Tinder’s questions, I was
when addressing three related estrangement questions in the first assigned essay. Now, after
reading Political Thinking and Dostoyevsky’s Notes from Underground, I view overcoming
estrangement requires abolishing our freedom and liberty, our free will.
In Political Thinking, Glenn Tinder asks Is Religion in some form needed for overcoming
through reason? Both questions present estrangement as a problem requiring a solution. But,
before addressing these questions, I had to establish a definition for estrangement. After
struggling with a self-debate, I reasoned estrangement was the result of our self-created
conventional inequalities; in other words, I viewed estrangement as the result of our physical
divide and separate ourselves. With my definition of estrangement, I addressed the first
question, Is religion is some form needed for overcoming estrangement? After reading Tinder, my
reasoning religion can not overcome estrangement has not been changed; my reasoning has
been affirmed. Religion and religious faith have divided and continues to divide us by
breeding intolerance and hatred. Because of religion, people have divided themselves in to
Tinder’s next question then needed to be addressed: Can estrangement be overcome through
inequalities through reason.” I believed and further stated, “reason would encourage humans
perspective, I ignored a key word: choice. Instead of addressing choice as the prime source of
progress towards eradicating inequalities in society, such as poverty, famine, and education.”
After reading Dostoyevsky’s Notes from Underground, I realized choice, our free will, must
liberty and our freedom lie within our inherent right to choose between right and wrong. Our
liberty and our freedom lie within our free will, lie within our ability to make rational or
Dostoyevsky’s writing made me cognizant of our free will. In Notes from
. . . reason is nothing but reason and satisfies only the rational side of man’s
nature, while [free] will is a manifestation of the whole life, that is, of the whole
Reason, as revealed by Dostoyevsky, is only one side of our nature; therefore, reason cannot
fully address estrangement as a political issue. We have the ability to be rational and
irrational. Reason may help eradicate our conventional inequalities in society, such as wealth,
1No page number is provided because my copy of Notes from Underground is an ebook with page numbers
based on my view settings; page numbers can be altered with a change in the settings.
Salinas 3
class and education; but, our conventional inequalities are a result of our free will. Therefore,
our estrangement is not a result of our conventional inequalities as I once believed and
concluded in the first essay. I now understand choice, like religion and religious faith, to be an
enabler for estrangement. We chose to divide ourselves along invisible lines of loyalty. We
have the choice to befriend our neighbors, the choice to hate and the choice to love. Reading
third question presented by Tinder: If all conventional inequalities were abolished, would estrangement
disappear?
Before Dostoyevsky, I would have answered Tinder’s question with a confident and
well-reasoned yes because I ignored our inherent freedom and liberty, our free will. Now, I
believe abolishing all conventional inequalities, such as class divisions by wealth and
education and wealth, limiting separations based on class status and thus limiting poverty, we
would still be presented with a choice. With greater access to wealth, there is greater access to
commercial items, such as televisions and computers. Therefore, we are presented with the
outside and befriend our neighbors. If we choose to befriend our televisions and remain inside
our homes, our estrangement will have not disappear despite having eradicated our separation
based upon conventional inequalities. So, returning to the previous question Can estrangement
be overcome through reason?, I still answer yes; however, I now understand overcoming
estrangement requires a sacrifice of our freedom and liberty, a sacrifice of our free will.
My believing reason can enable us to overcome estrangement has not been changed,
much like my believing religion can not help us overcome estrangement. However, my belief
Salinas 4
of eradicating estrangement having a positive impact on society has been altered. When
positive effect on humans by allowing us to create a much desired utopia. Reason could enable
us to create a society based upon mathematics and science without conventional inequalities.
But such a society would require us to make one ultimate sacrifice in choice: abandon our free
will. Societies with full equality in social status, education, healthcare, wealth, food, drugs and
sex are societies may have no estrangement, but such societies are based upon conformed
ideals and passive acceptance of the status quo. Conformity better enables humans to unite as
one in a common effort, much like insects working in unison for an unknown end. But
ideas, there is no need for democratic debate because there is no individuality and no free will.
Progress towards a dystopian society begins by addressing questions raised by
philosophers, political scientists and individuals. Reading Glenn Tinder’s Political Thinking
confident in my answer of overcoming estrangement through reason and not religion. But,
questions because I became cognizant of free will providing us with choice, and the
responsibility for our passive and active decisions. My altered perspective ideology views
individuality is essential to the prosperity of new ideas, and, therefore, for the progress and