Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form

Name of Employee:
Position:
Review Period:

Name of Rater:
Position:
Date of Review:

Teacher I
June-October 2014

Efren S. Consemino
Principal
June-October 2014

Bureau/Center/Service/Division:

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING

MFOs

KRAs

OBJECTIVES

TIMELINE

WEIGHT
PER
KRAS

PERFORMANCE
INDICATORS
(Quality, Efficiency

TARGET

Timelines)
BASIC
EDUCATION

1. Teaching-Learning
Process

1.a Prepared daily lesson plan and

June-March

daily logs of activities including

SERVICES

All daily lesson plans had

3-Had 3 of each parts.

the following Objectives,

Each part had a partial description without example

appropriate, adequate and updated

Subject matter, procedures

Objective was stated with 2 behavioral indicators

instructional materials within the

and evaluation. Each part

Atleast 85% developed high order thinking skills

rating period

1.b

40%

Facilitated learning in the

had partial description

June-March

Attained at least 85% of the desired learning competencies

without example

At least 80% complied based on the approved budget of work

Developed measurable

The teacher clearly communicated a focus for student learning

school through functional

goals for student learning

that is appropriate for students and is alligned with PELC and PSLC

lesson plans, daily logs

that is aligned with DepEd

Has provided individual activities for at least 85% of the classes

and innovative teaching

standards Secondary

strategies

handled for the rating period

Learning Competencies

Teaching methods and strategies elicited at least 85%

where teaching methods

interaction from a class

and strategies elicited at

Inductive/Deductive method was atleast 85%

least 90% interaction from

class

used in teaching the lesson

Cooperative learning strategies was at least 70% effective when used
ICT integration was at least 70& evident
Results of student observation/appraisal were at least 70% used as
basis for follow-up

1.c

Initiated discipline of students

At least 85% of the students

Pupils/Students were at least 85% guided in the observation of

including classroom rules,

were guided in the observa-

classroom rules and guidelines as evidenced by descriptive rating

guidelines and individual/

tion of classroom rules and

in the report card/journal

group tasks within the rating

guidelines as evidenced by

period

June - March

descriptive rating in the

report card

1.d Monitored attendance,

June-March

Safety, ordeliness and

diversity, appreciation, safe,

cleanliness of floors and

positive and motiviting

classroom and proper waste

enviroment, overall physical

disposal were 100%

atmosphere, cleanliness and

maintained. Attendance

orderliness of classrooms

Safety, orderliness and cleanliness of floors, toilets and proper

waste disposal are sometimes consiistently maintained
Attendance checking was at least 85% systematically carried out

checking was 100%

including daily proper waste

systematically carried out.

disposal
Ave.
2. Pupils/

2.a Monitored, evaluated and

Students

maintained pupils'/students'progress

Outcome

within the rating period

June- March

30%

The teacher planned instructions

without analyzing student
learning data

3-There is evidence of more than one measure of student

performance but there is difficulty in analyzing data to inform
instructional planning and delivery
Class record reflected the basis of at least 85% of students'
ratings in all classes/subject areas handled
Students' portfolio contained at least 85% of their accomplishments
Table of specification was at least 85% prepared for tests that require it
Table of specification was at least prepared for tests that require it
Table of specifications showed at least 70% congruence between content
and skills tested
Test questions were at least 70% logically sequenced
Pretest and Post-test were at least 70% administered in all classes/subject
(areasupported by analysis report on subject area per class/grade level)

2.b Conducted remediation/

June-March

enrichment programs to
improve performance

Maintained updated and

students who need it

where need it
June-March

accurate school records

2.d Attained the Required GSA for

3-Remediation/Enrichment Program was conducted to at least 60% of

to at least 60% of the students

indicators
2.c

Remediation/Enrichment
activities were conducted

Had 9 forms of the required

3-Had 7 forms of the required student school records

students' records
June-March

Attained 79% GSA of students

3-75-79% MPS/GSA

Grade level and learning areas

Ave.

TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

ACTUAL
RESULTS

SCORE

RATING

MFOs

KRAs

OBJECTIVES

TIMELINE

WEIGHT
PER

PERFORMANCE
INDICATORS

KRAS

(Quality, Efficiency

TARGET

Timelines)
3. Community

3.a

Involvement

Conducted Periodic P.T.A.

June-March

10%

Meetings/Conferences
3.b

Visited parents of students needing

Conducted at least 4 periodic

3-Atleast 2 periodic PTA meetings conducted in a school year

P.T.A. meetings
June-March

No home visit conducted

academic monitoring/follow-up

3-Atleast 85% accomplishment of visits with suggested

planned inventions

within the rating period

3.c

Undertaken/Initiated projects/events

June-March

Accomplishment 85% of the

activities with external funding/

3-Atleast 85% project initiative only with no completion report

project with no completion report

sponsorship within the target date

Ave.
4. Professional

4.a

Initiated/Participated in
co-curricular/school activities

Growth

June-March

10%

Membership in 3 teachers'

3-Iparticipated in most co-curricular school activities with

professional organization

documented results or membership to 3 taechers

within the rating period

and Development

4.b

Contributed creative work for

professional organization
June-March

None

3-Contributed creative work published in division publication

school paper/division publication

within the target date
4.c

Received special awards/citation/

June-March

Had 2 awards of recognition

3-Atleast 1 award (division) or at least 3 awards (school/district)

recognition for exemplery

performance
Ave.
5. Action Plan

5.a

Formulated Action Plan to

June-March

10%

Action Plan 100% implemented

3-Action Plan at least 85% implemented

enhance teaching-learning
process

Ave.

*To get the score, the rating is muplied by the weight assigned

OVERALL RATING FOR

ACCOMPLISHMENTS

EFREN S. CONSEMINO
Rater

ACTUAL
RESULTS

SCORE

Ratee

RATING

MFOs
BASIC EDUCATION
SERVICES

KRAs
1. Professional Growth
and Development

TIMELINE

WEIGHT
PER KRS

1.a Conducted Seminars/workshops

training for teachers specific
learning Areas

June to March

15%

1.b Received division, regional,

national awards/recognition
in a year

1.c Served as demonstration

teacher for school, division,
regional, national level trainings

OBJECTIVES

PERFORMANCE
INDICATORS
(Quality, Efficiency
Timelines)

ACTUAL
RESULTS

Conducted 3 seminars in
math

June to March

Received 1 regional award of

recognition as resource
speaker in the regional
seminar

June to March

Served/conducted 3 lesson
demonstration in English

Ave.

3.66
2. Instructional
Competence

2.a Handled full teaching load every

school year

June to March

2.b Achieved at least 75% of the students

performance at the end of the school
year

35%

100% teaching load handled

June to March

78% MPS

2.c Completed the required competencies

for students in every Quarter

June to March

Competed 98% of the required

competencies in every Quarter

2.d Increased NAT performance of school

June to March

achieved 3% increase in NAT

Ave.

3.5

MFOs

KRAs

OBJECTIVES

TIMELINE
WEIGHT
PER KRS

3. Instructional
Supervision

4. Research

3.a

Conducted mentoring/coaching
program to teachers in school
on Quarterly basis

June to March

3.b

Assisted/managed performance of
teachers following the RPMS cycle

June to March

4.a Conducted action research related to

school problems within a year

June to March

35%

15%

PERFORMANCE
INDICATORS
(Quality, Efficiency
Timelines)

ACTUAL
RESULTS

Mentored 3 teachers every

Quarter

Assisted in the evaluation of

performance of 93% of teachers
in his/her areas

Action research conducted and

utilized by school supplied with
required evidence

Ave.
3
5. Community
Involvement

3.a

Conducted Periodic P.T.A.

Meetings/Conferences

June-March

3.b

Visited parents of students needing

academic monitoring/follow-up
within the rating period

3.c

Undertaken/Initiated projects/events
activities with external funding/
sponsorship within the target date

15%

Conducted at least 4 periodic

P.T.A. meetings

June-March

No home visit conducted

June-March

Accomplishment 85% of the

project with no completion report

Ave.

3
*To get the score, the rating is muplied by the weight assigned

Rater

ACTUAL
RESULTS
attained objective
1.a at acceptable
or minimum
standard

SCORE

RATING

3.66

0.549

3.5

1.225

attained objective
1.b at more than the
acceptable
standard
attained objective
1.c at more than the
acceptable
standard

attained objective
2.a at outstanding level
attained objective
2.b at acceptable or
minimum standard
attained objective
2.c at outstanding level
poorly attained objective 2.d

ACTUAL
RESULTS

SCORE

RATING

3.5

1.225

attained objective 4.a at

acceptable or minimum
standard

0.45

Accomplished objective
3.a at outstanding level

0.45

attained objective 3.a at

acceptable or minimum
standard
attained objective 3.b at
more than the acceptable
standard

no home visit conducted

Attained objective
3.c at acceptable or
minimum standard

OVERALL RATING FOR

ACCOMPLISHMENTS

Ratee