Now to make a quick summary;

1. Time and Space is defined and their relationship with one another is understo
od to better finalize and verify the main investigation.
2. Time moves in cycles, is governed by motion and cannot exist above space.
3. Time allows things to exist, and things' existence are moving through time(te
mporarily or permanently). But the Existence of Time itself is still unquestione
d and uninvestigated.
3. Space is void manifest, and it can exist both in time(Lesser) and above time(
Greater) due not needing to respond to motion to exist, unlike time.
Keeping above points in mind let's investigate existence and time. If there was
no existence of one (or any) thing, can we say that time can still exist indepen
dantly of it? I say yes it does and there are many things all around me that exi
st already and each one of those do not contain everything else instead, (which
it could have) so those things do not exist, but time "exists"(funnily) without
needing their existence. So, <strong>existence of time requires existing first f
or time to exist, but time itself can give and measure existence to/of everythin
g else.</strong> But for a thing to exist independantly of time... I believe onl
y space can have that spot and space itself being a form of existence, I say exi
stence can occur outside and above the boundaries of time. Therefore;
-Time can exist independantly "of existence of other things", but is not indepen
dant of its own existence. Therefore time is governed by existence.
-Investigation of motion and existence seems unrelated for now and it was discus
sed and covered already much enough deeply in Saturn lecture.
And the final investigation to make. Can existence exist without space or can sp
ace be without existence? This would mean we have to investigate two situations;
1. Spaceless existence, 2. Existenceless space. Now, what is the smallest space
we know? It certainly isn't a 3d cube, but perhaps some could argue that it is
a sphere, a line or a triangle. I would conditionally agree that smallest space
we can have "manifest" equals to a point, which is technically still a sphere. B
ut even that gains its manifestation first, and then gains the quality of being
that which makes it space, since the same point could have existed and instead i
t could have been a point in time, therefore I suggest Space cannot precede Exis
tence. To make it fair and just, let's also analyze existenceless space. For a c
oncept to be existence yet is to be space means to me that it is almost akin to
Spaceless Space, simply because it cannot exist and cannot gain any quality, yet
I ask you, if something is without any quality, how can it exist? If anyone kno
ws anything something without quality, please do mention, I would be very intere
sted in trying to understand it and would be looking forward to how you would be
able to explain such a concept. The closest Thing I can ever think of such a no
t-being is God or Ouk Non, Total Nothingness. Yet even inside such non-being, ho
w can space ever be something? So I say that "state" is more close Existenceless
Existentence, than Spaceless Space, because if we see it from this perspective,
the latter only means that space has yet to exist, but it hasn't reached that s
tate yet(Spaceless Existence >= Spaceless Space). For sake of easieness on the a
rguement, let's call this Spaceless Existence, Greater Existence, and existence
of things which are shadow reflections of the Actual and Only True Existence ins
ide Time and Space, Lesser Existence.
Therefore based on all the arguement above I make the following suggestion that,
Total Nothingness > Greater Existence* > Greater Space > Motion > Time > Lesser
Space > Lesser Existence (of things)
The only thing that disturbs me in this sequence of manifestation is motion. It'
s true origin probably lies in the secret progression from Total Nothingness to
Greater Existence which is akin to 0 => 1 which we can for sake of simplificatio
n call Secret Motion. What disturbs me is that, where did it come from or why/ho

w did it ever occur? I think in some scriptures this was called desireless desir
e or something. But for the "motion" in above sequence is (Greater) motion, maki
ng Time somewhat its afterimage, of sorts and Lesser motion is the motion of thi
ngs that comes after Lesser Existence, who moves through Time, Cycles, Space, St
ars. Which makes me wonder If there is a Secret form of Existence behind Total N
othingness, but oh well I don't think It's possible to comprehend Oudenia haha s
till I believe there must be something beyond Nirvana.
So in conclusion, I want to finish making reference to a quote that;
"Existence is exalted above the structure of creation; yet it is born a slave of
motion.