Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
ScienceDirect
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jpor
Position Paper
* Corresponding author at: Section of Removable Partial Prosthodontics, Department of Masticatory Function Rehabilitation, Graduate
School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, 113-8549 Tokyo, Japan.
Tel.: +81 3 5803 5514; fax: +81 3 5803 5514.
E-mail address: kunfu.rpro@tmd.ac.jp (K. Fueki).
1883-1958/$ see front matter # 2013 Japan Prosthodontic Society. Published by Elsevier Ireland. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2013.12.002
p
Department of Prosthodontics, Division of Oral Functional Science and Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, Asahi
University, Japan
q
Division of Occlusion and Removable Prosthodontics, Health Sciences University of Hokkaido, Japan
r
Department of Prosthodontics, Gerodontology and Oral Rehabilitation, Osaka University Graduate School of
Dentistry, Japan
s
Department of Prosthodontics and Oral Implantology, Iwate Medical University, Japan
t
Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Rehabilitation, Removable Prosthetics, Kanagawa Dental College, Japan
u
Department of Prosthodontics, Showa University, Japan
v
Division of Fixed Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Meikai University, Japan
w
Section of Implant and Rehabilitative Dentistry, Division of Oral Rehabilitation Faculty of Dental Science, Kyushu
University, Japan
x
Department of Fixed Prosthodontics, Osaka University Graduate School of Dentistry, Japan
article info
abstract
Article history:
This position paper proposes a definition and naming standard for removable partial
dentures (RPDs) using thermoplastic resin, and presents a guideline for clinical application.
A panel of 14 experts having broad experience with clinical application of RPDs using
thermoplastic resin was selected from members of the Japan Prosthodontic Society. At a
Keywords:
with retentive elements (resin clasps) made of thermoplastic resin. The panel classified non-
meeting of the panel, non-metal clasp denture was referred as the generic name of RPDs
Removable partial denture
metal clasp dentures into two types: one with a flexible structure that lacks a metal
Thermoplastic resin
framework and the other having a rigid structure that includes a metal framework. Accord-
ing to current prosthetic principles, flexible non-metal clasp dentures are not recommended
Resin clasp
as definitive dentures, except for limited cases such as patients with a metal allergy. Rigid
Metal allergy
non-metal clasp dentures are recommended in cases where patients will not accept metal
clasps for esthetic reasons. Non-metal clasp dentures should follow the same design
principles as conventional RPDs using metal clasps.
# 2013 Japan Prosthodontic Society. Published by Elsevier Ireland. All rights reserved.
Contents
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Preparation of position paper . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Term and definition. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Indications and contraindications for NMCDs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4.1. Indications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4.2. Contraindications and cases in which use requires caution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4.2.1. Type of partially edentulous arch and occlusal relationship . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4.2.2. Anatomical factors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4.2.3. State of oral hygiene. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Advantages and disadvantages of NMCDs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5.1. Advantages . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5.1.1. Esthetics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5.1.2. Feel during use of NMCDs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5.1.3. Metal allergy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5.2. Disadvantages . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5.2.1. Discoloration and degradation of thermoplastic resin. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5.2.2. Difficulty of polishing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5.2.3. Breakage of resin clasp, difficulty of adjusting retention capacity and repair.
5.2.4. Design of retentive parts and periodontal condition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5.2.5. Ineligibility for insurance coverage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Recommendations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
5
6
6
6
6
7
7
8
8
8
8
8
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
10
10
1.
Introduction
Product name
Manufacturer
Polyamide
BIO PLAST
Valplast
Flex Star V
BIO TONE
Lucitone FRS
Ultimate
Polyester
EstheShot Bright
EstheShot
i-Cast
i-Cast
Polycarbonate
Reigning N
Reigning
JET CARBO-S
JET CARBO RESIN
Toushinyoukou
Toushinyoukou
HIGH DENTAL JAPAN
HIGH DENTAL JAPAN
Acrylic resin
ACRY TONE
Polypropylene
UNIGUM
WELDENZ
2.
3.
4.
Indications and contraindications for
NMCDs
4.1.
Indications
Fig. 3 A non-metal clasp denture with a framework (Reigning NW). (a) Basal surface of the denture; (b) metal rest and resin
clasp.
Fig. 4 A non-metal clasp denture using different denture base resins for retentive elements and a denture base. (a) Resin
clasp on working cast; (b) delivered denture.
Fig. 5 A non-metal clasp denture without metal framework replacing missing maxillary bilateral frontal teeth (ValplastW).
(a) Labial view on working cast; (b) palatal view on working cast.
4.2.
Contraindications and cases in which use requires
caution
Contraindications for NMCDs depend on the type of partially
edentulous arch and occlusal relationship, anatomical factors
that affect the design and fabrication of RPDs, or a state of oral
hygiene that may affect the maintenance and management of
RPD treatment.
Generic name
Product name
Polyamide
Valplast
Lucitone FRS
Ultimate
Low
Low
Low
Rigidb
Rigidb
Rigidb
Polyester
EstheShot Bright
EstheShot
Low
High
Rigidb
Rigid
Polycarbonate
Reigning
Reigning N
High
High
Rigid
Rigid
a
b
Denture rigidity
4.2.2.
Anatomical factors
4.2.3.
Fig. 6 Deterioration of thermoplastic resin used for nonmetal clasp denture. Polished surface of the maxillary
complete denture (left) was good, however surface of
denture base of a mandibular non-metal clasp denture
(EstheShotW) has become roughened after a year and
6-month use. Denture base of the posterior area was
repaired using a cold-cured resin (indicated with arrow).
5.
5.1.
Advantages
5.1.1.
Esthetics
Fig. 7 Deterioration of thermoplastic resin used for non-metal clasp dentures. (a) Loss of burnish on polished surface
(ValplastW); (b) discoloration and decolorization of thermoplastic resin (Lucitone FRSW).
5.1.2.
5.1.3.
Metal allergy
5.2.
Disadvantages
5.2.1.
5.2.4.
Surface roughening after a few months of denture delivery
was identified in all but a few materials [18]. As the surface is
not as hard as that of acrylic resin, the depths and the widths
of marks were greater than the acrylic resins by the scratch
test [19], thus the polished surface loses its luster. Discoloration and loss of color are also seen [2022] (Figs. 6 and 7).
Candida growth is not a concern as long as denture
maintenance is possible, but if adequate cleaning cannot be
performed then more caution would be required than for
acrylic resin [23].
5.2.2.
Difficulty of polishing
5.2.5.
6.
Recommendations
10
Conflicts of interest
The preparation of this position paper was funded by JPS. JPS
does not receive support from any specific group or
corporation. No funding from any group or corporation
was used for the preparation of this position paper. The
members of the expert panel and clinical guideline committee involved in the preparation of this position paper did not
receive any support from any specific group or corporation
with respect to NMCDs. Members of the expert panel who
had contributed to the development of or lectured on a
specific resin were not involved in writing about the resin
concerned.
Acknowledgement
This paper is the secondary publication of the position paper
published in the Annals of Japan Prosthodontic Society [27].
references