Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
ABSTRACT
Composite construction has been used in bridges and buildings for many years, and for
buildings and short span bridges the construction techniques are well developed. However, for
longer spans, especially at restricted access sites such as major river crossings and
environmentally sensitive areas, some unconventional approaches to composite construction are
required. The focus of this paper will be the design of steel/concrete composite structures in
long-span bridge applications.
BACKGROUND
Although bridges and buildings constructed of concrete floors supported on steel beams
and girders have been in use since the early 1900s, the design of beams as composite sections is
a relatively recent development, following closely with the development and acceptance of
welding as a structural fabrication technique. In a conventional sense, the top flanges of steel
girders are fitted with shear lugs, typically welded studs, to provide a positive means to prevent
slip along the interface between the steel beam and the concrete deck.
Conventional construction of a composite beam would be to erect the structural steel,
complete with splices, connections, and other attachments as may be required to provide a stable
framework for deck placement; installation of the deck formwork (either cold formed steel
decking, prestressed concrete deck panels, or conventional plywood forms) and shear studs; and
placement and finishing of the concrete deck. Generally, this method is quite satisfactory for
building construction as there are no real obstacles such as deep streams or ravines, fast-flowing
rivers, or major transportation routes to cross which require minimal disruption to underpassing
traffic. However, in bridge construction where there is always an obstacle of one form or
another construction methods are not always practical.
THE PROBLEM
As one can imagine, providing adequate shoring to support a structure with a span of
several hundred feet would prove difficult at best. Add to that the excess compression flange
area necessary to support not only the girder, but also the dead load of the concrete deck and
additional compression flange bracing, and it is easy to see that the advantage of composite
construction quickly disappears. Except for live load, the entire structural system may as well
be a non-composite section or elaborate shoring systems developed to support the girder while
waiting for the deck to cure.
Over the past twenty-five years or so, as analysis routines have become more
sophisticated, universities have added to the knowledge base of structural behavior, and
construction methods have been developed which utilize all components of a structural system,
medium and long span bridges have become more efficient and economical. By beginning the
design with a basic assumption as to the construction method and sequence, the engineer can
develop a design which fully utilizes all components in place at a given stage of construction,
without excessive materials or overstressing individual components.
Project Location
FIGURE 1. Location Map - Bill Emerson Memorial Bridge
3. The contractor will then lift and place precast concrete deck panels, spanning from
floorbeam to floorbeam and half the width of the bridge. Closure strips will then be
cast atop the floorbeams and allowed to cure prior to longitudinal post-tensioning of
the deck.
4. Once the post-tensioning has been completed, additional concrete strips will be cast
above the edge girder flanges.
5. The stay-cables for that field section will then be stressed to the intermediate, or final
erection force. Some minor force adjustments may be necessary after midspan
closure to achieve final roadway profile.
Upon close examination of these general construction steps it becomes obvious that the
superstructure begins as a noncomposite section and with the placement of the closure strips the
floorbeams and then the edge girders become composite sections.
In addition to the variable width of the slab effective for axial loads, as the section is
erected, bending in the section acts fully on a noncomposite section. Then, as the stay cable is
stressed, even to the minimal load of installation, the horizontal component of the load is carried
through the noncomposite section to the previously completed field section. Then the load acts
on an increasing larger composite section until the bridge section is fully effective. This force is
additive to the "locked-in" forces from the erection of preceding components.
Next, the panels are made composite with the floorbeams with a closure strip which is
cast on the top flange between the panels. Once cured, the panels are post-tensioned in the
longitudinal direction, then additional closure strips are cast on the edge girder flanges to make
the edge girders composite.
It is at this stage that the deck panels begin to benefit the structure. Although the full
section may not be effective until two to three additional field pieces are installed, the deck
begins to participate in carrying load.
CONCLUSIONS
As can be easily recognized by the above description, the construction of steel/concrete
composite bridges in the medium to long span range can be somewhat of a challenge to bridge
designers. The complex analyses to consider non-composite and composite sections, various
stress levels which may be "locked-in" to the non-composite section by the addition of a
composite deck, and the combination of both bending and axial stresses which act on variable
sections are the key to producing a safe, economical design. By careful consideration of
possible erection methods and equipment which could be used and its location during
construction ...