Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Science and Technology on Surface Physics and Chemistry Laboratory, P.O. Box No. 9-35, Huafengxincun, Jiangyou City, Sichuan Province 621908, China
National Key Laboratory for Nuclear Fuel and Materials, Nuclear Power Institute of China, Chengdu 610041, China
c
School of Material Science and Engineering, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang 621010, Sichuan, China
d
Institute of France-China Nuclear Engineering and Technology, Sun-Yat Sen University, Zhuhai 519000, China
b
art ic l e i nf o
a b s t r a c t
Article history:
Received 9 October 2015
Received in revised form
22 October 2015
Accepted 23 October 2015
Available online 24 October 2015
The Fe15Cr3Mo0.5Si alloy was treated by furnace cooling, air cooling or water cooling after annealing
at 1100 C for 1 h in vacuum atmosphere. The damping performance of the as-treated alloys was tested
with dynamic mechanical thermal analyzer and the effects of different cooling rates on phase, microstructure, coercive force and damping capacity were investigated. The results show that the cooling rates
have no inuence on the crystalline phase and grain sizes of the Fe15Cr3Mo0.5Si alloy. The phase of
the as-treated alloys is a single -Fe. Moreover, Cr- and Mo-containing carbide precipitation is detected
on alloy grain boundary of the furnace-cooled alloy, while no precipitated phase on the alloy grain
boundary of the air-cooled and water-cooled alloy. In addition, the furnace-cooled alloy shows the
smallest coercive force comparing with the air-cooled alloy, and the water-cooled alloy shows the biggest
coercive force. The peak values of logarithmic decrement of furnace-cooled, air-cooled and watercooled alloy are 0.209, 0.188 and 0.175 respectively. The gradual decrease of the damping capacity with
increasing cooling rate for the alloy mainly lies in the discrepancy of their micro internal stress.
& 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
FeCrMo based alloy
Damping capacity
Cooling rates
Coercive force
1. Introduction
With the ever-accelerated industry, the problems of vibration
and noise become increasingly worse, which not only affect the
safety and service life of mechanical and military equipment, but
also are of great harm to people's health. Therefore, the reduction
of vibrations and noises is an urgent task. The current solution,
which is regarded as the most important and effective means at
present, to this problem is to use high damping alloys. As is known
to all, Fe-based alloys with phase, such as FeCr based ferromagnetic metal alloys, have attracted much attention to many
researchers due to their excellent mechanical properties, corrosion
resistance and high damping capacity [17].
The damping mechanism of the FeCr based ferromagnetic
damping alloy is that the vibration energy is transferred to heat
energy through the irreversible movement of magnetic domain
walls, and then the resultant heat energy is dissipated by heat
conduction [13]. Many factors affect the damping capacity of
ferromagnetic FeCr based damping alloy. Studies [38] suggest
n
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2015.10.086
0921-5093/& 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
time, the cooling rate also has a signicant effect on microstructure, magnetic domain structure and the distribution of micro
internal stress of an alloy, which in turn affect the damping capacity of FeCr based damping alloy. However, when it comes to
the effect of heat treatment process on the microstructure and
damping capacity of an alloy, the factor of the cooling rates is
seldom taken into consideration. However, in order to further
improve the damping capacity of FeCr based damping alloy, it is
necessary to carry out systematic research on the effect of cooling
rates on the microstructure and damping capacity of the alloy.
Based on the quaternary iron-based damping alloy, Fe15Cr3Mo
0.5Si, which was obtained by our previous research and was
proved to be with good damping capacity [9,10], this paper further
studies the effect of different cooling rates (furnace cooling, air
cooling and water cooling) on the damping capacity, the microstructure and the internal stress of the alloy.
2. Experimental method
383
Si
Mo
Cr
Fe
No-1
No-2
0.48
0.53
2.96
3.02
14.96
14.07
0.003
0.004
0.012
0.015
Margin
Margin
384
Fig. 1. Microstructures of (a) the forged alloy and the Fe15Cr3Mo0.5Si alloy annealing at 1100 C for 1 h and cooling by (b) FC, (c) AC and (d) WC.
Hc =
3 s
2 MS L
(1)
where s is saturated magnetostrictive coefcient, is permeability in vacuum, MS refers to saturation magnetization, is the
thickness of the magnetic domain wall, and L is the magnetic
domain size. For an alloy with complete recrystallization, the
coercive force only depends on its internal stress.
From Fig. 5 and Table 3, the alloy treating by FC shows the least
coercive force compared with the other two alloys, while the alloy
385
Fig. 2. Precipitated phases of the samples on the grain boundary cooling by (a) furnace cooling (FC), (b) air cooling (AC) and (c) water cooling (WC).
Table 2
Compositions of the precipitated phases of the alloy in Fig. 2(a).
No.
C/wt%
Cr/wt%
Mo/wt%
Fe/wt%
No.1
No.2
0.59
0.011
21.76
14.58
3.26
2.89
Margin
Margin
Fig. 3. Equilibrium phase diagram of Fe15Cr3Mo based alloy at different temperature (C 0.015%).
386
Fig. 5. Hysteresis curves of the coercive force of the alloys treating by (a) FC, (b) AC
and (c) WC.
Table 3
Coercive force values of the alloys treating by different cooling modes.
Cooling rates
FC
AC
WC
Coercive force
369.44
374.14
382.85
387
= Q 1 =
4kE2 s
4kE2 s
=
3i
3i
(2)
where k is dimensionless constant, s is the saturated magnetostriction coefcient, E is the Young's modulus, is the strain
amplitude and si is the internal stress. From formula (2), the internal friction of the damping alloy is proportional to the strain
amplitude and they show a linear relationship. Rayleigh slope SR
can be obtained after differential of by formula (2):
4kE2 s
d
=
= SR
d
3i
Fig. 6. Yield strength curves of different cooled alloys after annealing at 1100 C/
1 h.
(3)
From formula (2) and formula (3), for a given alloy, SR is inversely proportional to i at small strain amplitude, which is also
reected in Fig. 7. For water-cooled alloy, the biggest internal
stress exists in the alloy due to the interstitial C atoms within
crystals and high supersaturation vacancy concentration. Therefore, the minimum SR and the smallest logarithmic decrement at
low strain amplitude are obtained. After reaching max, curve
begins to decline, because the irreversible movement of magnetic
domain wall, which attains its saturated state at max, can not
convert mechanical energy into heat energy. It means that the
ferromagnetic damping disappears. It has been revealed that the
damping is caused by dislocation glide after reaching the maximum value [16]. Energy dissipation caused by dislocations is
another important damping source for the ferromagnetic damping
alloy. In this paper, for the alloy annealing at 1100 C for 1 h, the
high annealing temperature and low cooling rate greatly eliminates their dislocations. Therefore, the curves after reaching
max at high strain amplitude begin to decline rapidly.
4. Conclusions
interstitial atoms have a pinning effect on the irreversible movement of magnetic domain wall. The irreversible movement of
magnetic domain wall requires overcoming the barriers of the
internal stress arisen from grain boundary, interstitial atoms, vacancies, etc. For the alloy treating by FC, the movement of magnetic domain wall is more ease and starts under smaller strain
amplitude due to the segregation of C, N and other interstitial
atoms on the grain boundary and lower internal supersaturated
vacancy concentration. Therefore, the strain amplitude corresponding to max is smaller and the logarithmic decrement is
higher under the same strain amplitude for the alloy.
It is widely recognized that the magnetic elastic coupling is the
main damping source for a ferromagnetic alloy, and so the
damping is called magnetic-mechanical hysteresis damping. The
damping mechanism mainly comes from macro eddy-current
damping, micro eddy-current damping and magnetic-mechanical
hysteresis damping. In these three mechanisms, the magneticmechanical hysteresis damping, which is dependent on strain
amplitude, is one order of magnitude higher than the sum of
macro eddy-current damping and micro eddy-current damping.
So, the magnetic-mechanical hysteresis damping is the main
source of the ferromagnetic damping material at low frequency.
The magnetic-mechanical hysteresis damping can also be explained by the SB theory which was put forward by Smith and
Birchak [15]. The theory gives the formulas (formula (2)) for
388
Acknowledgments
Great thanks to China Academy of Engineering Physics and
Nuclear Power Institute of China for help in terms of experimental
conditions.
References
[1] W.G. Wang, B.X. Zhou, The correlation of damping capacity with
grain boundary precipitates in FeCr-based damping alloys annealed at high
temperature, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 366 (2004) 4549.
[2] R. Schaller, Metal matrix composites, a smart choice for high damping materials, J. Alloy. Compd. 355 (2003) 131135.
[3] I.S. Golovin, Damping mechanisms in high damping materials, High Damp.
Mater. II 319 (2006) 225230.
[4] N. Igata, K. Nishiyama, K. Ota, et al., Panel discussion on the application of
HDM, J. Alloy. Compd. 355 (2003) 230240.
[5] N. Igata, Applications of high damping stainless alloy(HIDAS), High Damp.
Mater. II 319 (2006) 209216.
[6] A. Karimi, Ch Azcoitia, J. Degauque, Relationships between magnetomechanical damping and magnetic properties of FeCr(Al,Mo) alloys, J. Magn. Magn.
Mater. 215216 (2000) 601603.
[7] I.S. Golovina, A. Rivirec, Anelasticity in FeAlCr alloys at elevated temperatures, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 521522 (2009) 6772.
[8] D. Pulino Sagradi, M. Sagradi, A. Karin, et al., Damping capacity of FeCrX
high-damping alloys and its dependence on magnetic domain structure, Scr.
Mater. 39 (1998) 131138.
[9] Hui Wang, Huawei Huang, Xiaofeng Hong, Changgeng Yin, Zhaohua Huang,
Le Chen, Research on low strain magnetic mechanical hysteresis damping
performance of Fe15Cr3Mo0.5Si alloy, J. Alloy. Compd. 622 (2015) 1723.
[10] Hui Wang, Xiao-Feng Tian, Chang-geng Yin, Zhao-hua Huang, The effect of
heat treatment and grain size on magnetomechanical damping properties of
Fe13Cr2Al1Si alloy, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 619 (2014) 199204.
[11] Z.C. Zhou, J.N. Wei, E.S. Han, Inuences of heat treatment and grain size on the
damping capacity of a FeCrAI alloy, Phys. Status Solidi A 191 (2002) 8996.
[12] W. Schneider, P. Schrey, G. Hausch, et al., Damping capacity of Fe-Cr and Fe-Cr
based high damping alloys, J. Phys. 42 (1981) 635639.
[13] A. Karimi, C. Azcoitia, J. Degauque, Relationships between magnetomechanical
damping and magnetic properties of FeCr(Al,Mo) alloys, J. Magn. Magn.
Mater. 215216 (2000) 601603.
[14] J.S. Lu, X. Liu, W. Zheng, A Study of impact toughness of FeCrX damping
alloys, J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 3 (1994) 409411.
[15] G.W. Smith, J.R. Birchak, Internal stress distribution theory of magnetomechanical hysteresis an extension to include effects of magnetic eld and
applied stress, J .Appl. Phys. 40 (1969) 51745178.
[16] Xiaofeng Hu, Xiuyan Li, Bo Zhang, Magnetic domain structure and damping
capacity of Fe13Cr2.5Mo alloy, Mater. Sci. Eng. B 171 (2010) 4044.