Changing perspectives within ESP speaking

The successful communication have to be rise by both of speaker

between native or non-native speakers. Because native speakers also need
language training to understand the differences of language. In aviation
aspect, communication is limited between air traffic controller (ATC) and pilot
also. So it has own protocol, pronunciation and grammar. Such as between
pilot and air traffic controller have some codes when they are take a
conversation and It has a specific meaning.
The further of the explanation, every L1 speakers have different way to
express like greetings and closings. More 36% between pilot and ATC get
misunderstanding because they cannot follow the required scripts. for
example, in aviation English word hold means stop and colloquially means
continue or maintain.But actually, being native speakers of English is not
necessarily. Because non-native speaker could act well than native speaker.
The conference forum
It means that the ways when take presentation in a conferences. The
aspect of it is include posters and papers. Those aspect could be explored in
a research by individual or group. We used both of them because a part of
student prefer to like by using paper when taking presentation. On the other
hand, students prefer to by using poster in same condition. Kind of poster
presentations need speakers to remain at their assigned location for a
specified period of time, during they have opportunities to interact with and
get feedback from attendees.Lacking the control gave by a conference
presentation paper, poster presenters have to be good at reading the
audience on many stages including interest in the research and the quantity
and level of detail to provide.
Move Model for paper CP introductions (based on Rowley Jolivetand Carter Thomas 2005a )

1. Meeting interpersonal aims: Establishing rapport and projecting a persona

Examples:
Greeting
Joking
Offering personal anecdotes
Making light - hearted remarks
Thanking the audience for being present at a less than ideal time or
expressing thanks to collaborators or those providing financial support.

2. Meeting discoursal aims: Preparing the audience

Examples:
Presenting the topic in a light different from what was previously stated or
written
Enhancing the contribution of the research by using evaluative language to
indicate novelty (possibly absent from the title or abstract)
Indicating one s stance toward the topic (possibly absent from the title or
abstract)
Outlining the talk.
Move B. Contextualizing the framework
Situating the talk within the larger conference experience or research area
Examples:
Referring to other presentations/conference events or other acts of
intertextuality

 Alluding to previous work likely to be familiar to attendees (Literature

reviews, typical of research article introductions, are absent due to time
constraints and the cognitive burden this would place on the listeners. The
talk is situated by assuming shared knowledge.)
Move C. Indicating the research rationale
1. Stating motivation
Examples:
Highlighting problems, gaps or counter claims
Asserting relevance, centrality or need
Establishing the continuation of previous work.
2. Responding to the motivators
Examples:
Raising questions
Stating hypothesis
Previewing results or solutions
Outlining research goals.

Conference presentation is the most important for all ESP research.

Especially, for compare between speaking and writing in differences and
similarities. The Conference Presentation

findings are relevant for all

presenters without to know of their L1. The proficiency in English may

contribute to successful CP or other speaking events. In global economy,
native English will learn ways to provide agents in a different cultural and
linguistic background for make understanding between them.
Conclusions and Future Directions

In conclusion, the ESP speaking is an approach to teaching language.

ESP have aims to make researcher, instructor, material designer and
curriculum are clear. So that, when spoken in English between native or nonnative have accuracy for effective in communication context.